angeliki karanasiou source apportionment of particulate matter in urban aerosol institute of nuclear...
TRANSCRIPT
Angeliki Karanasiou
Source apportionment of particulate matter in urban aerosol
Institute of Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory,
N.C.S.R. Demokritos, Athens, Greece
Background
•Athens has significant air pollution problems •Non-attainment of the EU Air Quality Standard for Particulate Matter is frequent
•Receptor models applied to aerosol chemical composition data can identify the source types (Hopke, 2003)
The fundamental principle of receptor modelling isthat mass conservation can be assumed and a mass
balance analysis can be used to identify andapportion sources of airborne particulate matter in
the atmosphere
Receptor Modelling
Sources Known
•Chemical Mass Balance
(Watson et al., 1990)
Sources Unknown
•Principal Component Analysis (Thurston and Spengler, 1985)
•Unmix (Henry, 2000)
•Positive Matrix Factorization (Paatero and Tapper, 1993; Paatero, 1997)
A mass balance equation can be written to account for all m chemical species in the n samples as contributions from p independent sources
1
p
k
ij ik kjx g f
Where i = 1,…, n samples, j = 1,…, m species and k =1,…, p sources
Positive Matrix Factorization
0, 0ik kjg f 2n
2i=1 1
= m ij ik kj
j ij
X G FQ
s
i = 1,…, n samples
j = 1,…, m species
k =1,…, p sources (user specified)
Xn m
= Gn p
Fj p
source profile, μg/μg
source contribution, μg/m3
Sij: uncertainty in Xij
Aerosol Mass Balance
Aerosol Sampling
•Sampling was conducted on three sites located in Athens urban area•Two aerosol-sampling campaigns at each site were performed during March - December 2002 in Athens, covering the cold and warm period of the year•PM10 and PM2.1 samples were collected
simultaneously over a 24 h period (55 samples)•Aerosol components determined: metallic elements, sulphate, black carbon
Positive Matrix Factorization, PMF2Two separate datasets Fine aerosol specie concentration in PM2Coarse aerosol specie concentration in PM10-PM2
Aerosol concentrations
Important steps in PMF
Preliminary runs to select the number of factors
/
i xij j j
j j j j
xij XS N
mDL mDL
S/N>2: strong variables
Sources
Variables
1 2
1
max ,p
ij ij kj ik
k
S C C x f g
C1: Combined standard uncertainty
2 21 R j ijC S a X SR: variable reproducibility
aj: deviation from the true value
C2: Sampling uncertainty
Uncertainty
Aerosol sources
Fine aerosol
•Road dust•Vehicles•Biomass burning•Marine aerosol•Oil combustion
Coarse aerosol
•Road dust •Soil•Marine aerosol
Fine aerosol sources
BC, SO42-, crustal
metals
diesel and gasoline exhaust emissions
Road dust
Vehicles
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
Cd Pb V Ni Mn Cr Cu Fe Al Ca Mg K Na BC SO4
Con
cent
ratio
n, μ
g/μg
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
Cd Pb V Ni Mn Cr Cu Fe Al Ca Mg K Na BC SO4
Conce
ntr
atio
n, μg/μ
g
Fine aerosol sources
mixed source?secondary aerosol
Marine aerosol
Biomass burning
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
Cd Pb V Ni Mn Cr Cu Fe Al Ca Mg K Na BC SO4
Con
cent
ratio
n, μ
g/μg
BC pulled towards zero, Fkey
Dall’Osto and Harrison, 2006
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
Cd Pb V Ni Mn Cr Cu Fe Al Ca Mg K Na BC SO4
Co
nce
ntr
atio
n,
μg
/μg
PMF
marine aerosol
(Wilson, 1975)
Fine aerosol sources
Fe: fuel oil (V, Ni)Samara et al, 2005, Atm Environ, 39, 6430-6443
Oil combustion
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
Cd Pb V Ni Mn Cr Cu Fe Al Ca Mg K Na BC SO4
Con
cent
ratio
n, μ
g/μg
Coarse aerosol sources
Road dust
Soil
Scheff and Valiozis, Atm Environ, 24, 203-211, 19900.001
0.01
0.1
1
Pb V Ni Mn Cr Cu Fe Al Ca Mg K Na SO4
Coc
entr
atio
n, μ
g/μ
g
PMF
soil
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
Pb V Ni Mn Cr Cu Fe Al Ca Mg K Na SO4
Con
cent
ratio
n, μ
g/μ
g
Coarse aerosol sources
Marine aerosol
(Wilson, 1975)0.001
0.01
0.1
1
Pb V Ni Mn Cr Cu Fe Al Ca Mg K Na SO4
Con
cent
ration
, ng/
ng
PMF
marine aerosol
Sources – fine and coarse mode
Typical Mass concentration distribution from "Micron" Inverted Berner impactor measurements
0
10
20
30
40
0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00
Aerodynamic diameter, Dp [m]
Ma
ss
Co
nc
en
tra
tio
n d
M/D
log
(Dp
)
[g
/m3]
Athens suburban Aerosol
PM2.1
PM10
Certain sources existed in both coarse and fine fractions
Fine fraction includes a ‘tail end’ of the coarse mode
Karanasiou et al.,2007. Atmospheric Environment, 41, 2368–2381.
Positive Matrix Factorization in PM10
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
Cd Pb V NiM
n CrCu Fe Al
CaM
g K NaBC
SO4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
Cd Pb V NiM
n CrCu Fe Al
CaM
g K NaBC
SO4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
Cd Pb V NiM
n CrCu Fe Al
CaM
g K NaBC
SO40.001
0.01
0.1
1
Cd Pb V NiM
n CrCu Fe Al
CaM
g K NaBC
SO4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
Cd Pb V NiM
n CrCu Fe Al
CaM
g K NaBC
SO4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
Cd Pb V NiM
n CrCu Fe Al
CaM
g K NaBC
SO4
Marine aerosol Vehicles
Biomass burningUnidentified
Unidentified Road/Soil dust
Tracers
Pearson correlation coefficient between source contributions and variable concentrations
Road dust: CaBiomass burning: KMarine aerosol: NaOil combustion: FeVehicles: Ni
Coarse aerosol: no significant correlations between source contributions and variable concentrations
Wind direction vs Source contribution
Fuel oil Marine aerosol
-50
50
150
250
N
NNE
NE
ENE
E
ESE
SE
SSE
S
SSW
SW
WSW
W
WNW
NW
NNW
-1000
0
1000
2000
3000
N
NNE
NE
ENE
E
ESE
SE
SSE
S
SSW
SW
WSW
W
WNW
NW
NNW
-200
100
400
700
N
NNE
NE
ENE
E
ESE
SE
SSE
S
SSW
SW
WSW
W
WNW
NW
NNW
Biomass burning
-200
100
400
700
N
NNE
NE
ENE
E
ESE
SE
SSE
S
SSW
SW
WSW
W
WNW
NW
NNW
Vehicles
-200
0
200
400
600
N
NNE
ENE
E
SSE
ESE
SE
SSE
E
SSW
SW
WSW
W
WNW
NW
NNW
Road dust
•No directional dependence•Sources are dispersed in Athens basin
Conclusions
PMF resolved the major source typesFive sources were identified in fine aerosol representing Road dust, Vehicles, Biomass burning, Marine aerosol and Oil combustion Coarse aerosol sources were Road dust, Soil and Marine aerosolAerosol sources were not clearly identified in PM10 data setNi proved to be a good tracer of vehicle emissions in Athens
Take home messages
Receptor models can provide valuable information on aerosol sources PM10 monitoring could not provide adequate information on aerosol sourcesAerosol organic compounds could yield a resolved factor based on the source of the tracer
Acknowledgements Special thanks to Prof. Pentti Paatero for the fruitful discussions and suggestions on PMF