andy stirling - nexus methods (rgs 2016)
TRANSCRIPT
www.steps-centre.org/www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/www.multicriteria-mapping.org www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/people/peoplelists/person/7513
Andy StirlingSPRU & STEPS Centre
University of Sussex
Chair’s plenary lecture for Royal Geographical Society / Institute for British Geographers conference on ‘Nexus Thinking’
Ondaatje Theatre, Imperial College, LondonTuesday 30th August 2016
23rd June 2016
Meeting ‘Nexus’ Challenges:
from policy connections to political transformations
What is ‘the Nexus’?
food
water
energy
What is ‘the Nexus’?
food
water
energy
Substantive imperatives for ‘joined up policy…?
… or instrumental
pressure for policy justification?
What is ‘the Nexus’?
climatedevelopment
food
environmentsecurity
globalisation
energy
population
migrationurbanisation
water
water
climatedevelopment
food
environmentsecurity
globalisation
energy
population
migrationurbanisation
1: ‘NEXUS THINKING’
SPANS ACROSS
DIFFERENT SILOS
What is ‘the Nexus’?
Phenonema Under Scrutiny
• social and material world
•“systems” and “contexts”
• “scales” and “levels”
• “actors” and “networks”
• “values” and “interests”
• “frames” and “narratives”
• “causes” and “effects”
• processes and relations
• “knowledges”,“incertitudes”
• “positives” and “negatives”
• “structures” and “agents”
• “actions” and “reactions”
• “imaginations” and “visions”
• “metrics” and ”indices”
cost-benefit analysis
risk assessment
decision analysis
multiattribute utility theory
technology assessment
life cycle analysis
optimisation modelling
Bayesian networks
extended accounting
data mining
delphi methods
Quantitative Culture Qualitative Culture
No shortage of candidate ‘Nexus methods’
scenario workshops
focus groups
participatory appraisal
stakeholder deliberation
ethnomethodology
collaborative design
capabilities assessment
strategic appraisal
action research
cooperative research
study groups
Energy regulation: most mature, sophisticated comparative analysis…
A Key Common Problem: Concealed Ambiguity
0.001 0.1 10 1000externality’: cUS/kWh (after Sundqvist et al, 2005)low RISK high
coal
oil
gas
nuclear
hydro
wind
solar
biomass
Energy regulation: most mature, sophisticated comparative analysis…
A Key Common Problem: Concealed Ambiguity
0.001 0.1 10 1000
coal
oil
gas
nuclear
hydro
21
wind
solar
biomass
n =
‘externality’: cUS/kWh (after Sundqvist et al, 2005)
minimum maximum25% 75%
low RISK high
Energy regulation: most mature, sophisticated comparative analysis…
A Key Common Problem: Concealed Ambiguity
coal
oil
gas
nuclear
hydro
36
20
wind 18
solar 11
biomass 22
31
21
16
n =
…‘sound science’, ‘evidence based’ Nexus analyses justify many policies
Energy regulation: most mature, sophisticated comparative analysis…
A Key Common Problem: Concealed Ambiguity
Equally true of qualitative research, but this is better appreciated
All Quantification is Qualitatively Framed
Equally true of qualitative research, but this is better appreciated
2: ‘NEXUS THINKING’
Framing Applies in Every Setting and Level
TRANSCENDS
‘PLACE’, ‘SPACE’ & ‘SCALE’
under-determined realities
Framing ‘the Nexus’
Insights well known in geography:
-relational ontologies
-constructivist epistemologies
-nonrepresentational theories
…
But conventionally recognised only
in s eparated academic s ilos , often
mos tly concerned with critique …
… and more preoccupied with
‘how to know?’ than ‘what to do?’
‘system’‘focus’
under-determined realities picture of problem/solution
Framing ‘the Nexus’
‘scope’
‘system’‘focus’
under-determined realities picture of problem/solution
Framing ‘the Nexus’
‘scope’
‘system’‘focus’
‘cause’
‘effect’
under-determined realities picture of problem/solution
Framing ‘the Nexus’
environment‘scope’
‘system’‘focus’
subjective framing
‘effect’
under-determined realities
‘cause’view 1
picture of problem/solution
Framing ‘the Nexus’
environment
‘system’
under-determined realities diverse picturesplural frames
‘effect’
‘cause’
‘scope’
‘focus’
view 2
view 1
cont
endin
g
know
ledge
s
and
value
s
Framing ‘the Nexus’
plural frames
‘system’
‘cause’
‘effect’
under-determined realities diverse pictures
‘scope’
‘focus’
view 3
view 1
view 2
cont
endin
g
know
ledge
s
and
value
s
Framing ‘the Nexus’
view 4
plural frames
‘system’
‘cause’
‘effect’
under-determined realities diverse pictures
‘scope’
‘focus’
cont
endin
g
know
ledge
s
and
value
s
view 1
view 2
view 3
Framing ‘the Nexus’
view 4
plural frames
‘system’
‘cause’
‘effect’
under-determined realities diverse pictures
‘scope’
‘focus’
view 1
view 2
view 3
Framing ‘the Nexus’
different notions of ‘what to do?’
3: ‘NEXUS THINKING’
ENTANGLES
‘OBJECTS’ & ‘SUBJECTS’
view 4
plural frames
‘system’
‘cause’
‘effect’
under-determined realities diverse pictures
‘scope’
‘focus’
cont
endin
g
know
ledge
s
and
value
s
Framing ‘the Nexus’
incu
mben
ts
view 2
view 3
view 1
“THE NEXUS”
“THE NEXUS SOLUTION”
incu
mben
ts
power in knowledge
‘system’
‘cause’
‘effect’
under-determined realities
academic
government
local people
diverse pictures
‘scope’
‘focus’
cont
endin
g
know
ledge
s
and
value
s
“THE NEXUS”
Framing ‘the Nexus’
4: ‘NEXUS THINKING’
HIGHLIGHTS
POWER AND POLITICS
IN KNOWLEDGE
“THE NEXUS”
“THE NEXUS SOLUTION”
fundamental natural laws
biophysical environments
societies & economies
cultures &
institutions
Science (of all kinds!) is a key means by
which to remind “the real world”
of politics about the
“real real world” of everything else
The Political Conditioning of Nexus Thinking
KNOWLEDGE PRACTICES
fundamental nature
biophysical environments
societies & economies
cultures & instituions
But knowledge is produced by people,
with cultures, pursuing practices
in institutions
… in political ways
so knowledge is jointly shaped to
reflect both social and natural orders
The Political Conditioning of Nexus Thinking
KNOWLEDGE PRACTICES
fundamental nature
biophysical environments
societies & economies
INSTITUTIONS
This leads to a paradox
What is inside…
… is also outside
The Political Conditioning of Nexus Thinking
KNOWLEDGE PRACTICES
biophysical environments
societies & economies
INSTITUTIONS
This leads to a paradox
What is inside…
… is also outside
… as in a Klein Bottle, knowledge is on the
inside and the outside of human action
KNOWLEDGE PRACTICES
The Political Conditioning of Nexus Thinking
KNOWLEDGE PRACTICES
fundamental nature
knowledge practices
biophysical environments
INSTITUTIONS
KNOWLEDGE PRACTICES
The Political Conditioning of Nexus Thinking
5: ‘NEXUS THINKING’
UNDERSCORES
CO-CONSTITUTING OF
KNOWLEDGE AND ACTION
Constituting knowledges and actions are founded in equal social relations
Strongly resisted by elite science and incumbent governance institutions
Sustainability As Political Action
Driven by decades of collective struggle by grassroots social movements
Understandings of new hopeful visions of alternative directions for progress
social equality
human wellbeing
ecological integrity
Sustainability (& Nexus) as Political not Technical
Meeting the needs of the present, without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs
Brundtland (1987) codified challenge for elite institutions of global governance
Provide normative guides for accountability in driving directions of social progress
Emphasising consistentlythroughout, importance of:“effective citizen participation” and “greater democracy”
environmental integrity
social equality
human wellbeing
SUSTAINABLILITY
Even the most specific environmental issues, all initially vigorously resisted
pesticides…pesticides… asbestos…pesticides… asbestos… radiation…pesticides… asbestos… radiation… lead…pesticides… asbestos… radiation… lead… carcinogens…pesticides… asbestos… radiation… lead… carcinogens… CFCs…pesticides… asbestos… radiation… lead… carcinogens… CFCs… EDCs…
Sustainability (& Nexus) as Political not Technical
And innovations now mainstream were initially excluded and suppressed
organic farming…organic farming… wind turbines…organic farming… wind turbines… super-efficiency…organic farming… wind turbines… super-efficiency… closed cycle production…
Constituting problems & solutions both of Sustainabilty & the Nexusdepend on asserting alternative knowledges and visions
Sustainability (& Nexus) as Political not Technical
2015: Sustainability as Care: “leave no one behind”
SDGs offer political ratchets and pivots for collective action & democratic challenge
2015: Sustainability as Care: “leave no one behind”
In this key normative tradition where it emerged, ‘nexus thinking’ can help illuminate, enable and render accountable, a complexity and multiplicity of contexts, perspectives and possibilities
In this key normative tradition where it emerged, ‘nexus thinking’ can help illuminate, enable and render accountable, a complexity and multiplicity of contexts, perspectives and possibilities
ocean “eco cities”
carbon capture
reorganised services
offshore windnuclear power marine energy
bioenergy
grassroots renewables
centralised solar
eg: alternative infrastructures for ‘the’ zero carbon transition …
in branching social and technological innovation pathways
… choice is about democratic politics, not managerial control
Sustainability and Nexus Thinking
But Nexus Rhetorics also bring Another Challenge
If seen as technical and singular, rather than political and plural…Nexus thinking can become about control (rather than care); narrowing understandings, closing down choices, justifying power
Simplified instrumental assessment…
eg: -singular ‘bottom line’-‘simple solutions’-‘sound science’-evidence based policy
Subverting appreciations for complexity, uncertainty, context-sensitivity, multiple framings and diverse options
If seen as technical and singular, rather than political and plural…Nexus thinking can become about control (rather than care); narrowing understandings, closing down choices, justifying power
eg: -securitisation-nuclear power-big pharma-IP intense GM
Incumbent institutions & technologies…
But Nexus Rhetorics also bring Another Challenge
Subverting appreciations for complexity, uncertainty, context-sensitivity, multiple framings and diverse options
If seen as technical and singular, rather than political and plural…it can become about control (rather than care); narrowing understandings, closing down choices, justifying incumbent power
Politics reduced to risk: from ends: strategic choices between visionsto means: detailed regulation of modalities
Singular top down visionsfor ‘the transition’ - models
- missions- handbooks- manuals- “road maps”
But Nexus Rhetorics also bring Another Challenge
Subverting appreciations for complexity, uncertainty, context-sensitivity, multiple framings and diverse options
If seen as technical and singular, rather than political and plural…it can become about control (rather than care); narrowing understandings, closing down choices, justifying incumbent power
Politics reduced to risk: from ends: strategic choices between visionsto means: detailed regulation of modalities
Anthropocene planetary management “control variables
of the Earth”
“non-negotiable”
“absolutely no uncertainty” … “no compromise”
humanity as a “control force”
But Nexus Rhetorics also bring Another Challenge
Subverting appreciations for complexity, uncertainty, context-sensitivity, multiple framings and diverse options
If seen as technical and singular, rather than political and plural…it can become about control (rather than care); narrowing understandings, closing down choices, justifying incumbent power
Politics reduced to risk: from ends: strategic choices between visionsto means: detailed regulation of modalities
Climate geoengineeringmaintaining “optimal Holocene conditions”
But Nexus Rhetorics also bring Another Challenge
Subverting appreciations for complexity, uncertainty, context-sensitivity, multiple framings and diverse options
From Rhetorics to Practice
Affirm key insights and qualities of ‘Nexus thinking’ discussed here…
1 ‘nexus thinking’ spans across different academic and policy silos
2 ‘nexus thinking’ is framed in ways that transcend place, space and scale
3 ‘nexus thinking’ means recognizing subjects are entangled in objects
4 ‘nexus thinking’ highlights politics and power in knowledge
5 ‘nexus thinking’ enacts co-constituting of knowledge and action
… ways of knowing are kinds of doing
INPUTS
(aspects taken into account within practice of research or appraisal)
problems, options, pros / cons, issues, uncertainties, perspectives
INPUTS
(things that are taken into account)
Pro
blems, options, pros / cons, issues, uncertainties, perspectives
narrow
broad
closing down opening up
expert / analytic
participatory / deliberative
OUTPUTS
(aspects that are conveyed outwards into wider discourse)
’Plural conditional’ conclusions…
… if X then A … if Y then B …
From Rhetorics to Practice
A multiplicity of practical ‘nexus methods’ can help resist closure … helping enable collective action in long tradition of sustainability
narrow
broad
closing down opening up
expert / analytic
participatory / deliberative
decision analysis
INP
UT
S
OUTPUTS
sustainability
safety
impacts
From Rhetorics to Practice
A multiplicity of practical ‘nexus methods’ can help resist closure … helping enable collective action in long tradition of sustainability
narrow
broad
closing down opening up
expert / analytic
participatory / deliberative
citizen’s juries
INP
UT
S
OUTPUTS
From Rhetorics to Practice
A multiplicity of practical ‘nexus methods’ can help resist closure … helping enable collective action in long tradition of sustainability
narrow
broad
closing down opening up
expert / analytic
participatory / deliberative
citizen’s juries
participatory appraisal
q-method
scientometric mapping
open space
multicriteria mapping
extended foresightcitizen’s juries
decision analysis
stakeholder negotiation
participatory sensitivity analysis
cost-benefit analysis
risk assessment
interactive modelling
structured interviews
participant observation
multi-site ethnographic-
methods
citizen’s juries
consensus conference
open hearings
concurrent evidence
critical narratives
intervention futures
PIPA
plural photovoice
system histories
innovation histories
INP
UT
S
OUTPUTS
From Rhetorics to Practice
A multiplicity of practical ‘nexus methods’ can help resist closure … helping enable collective action in long tradition of sustainability
spot-the-narrative
narrow
broad
closing down opening up
expert / analytic
participatory / deliberative
citizen’s juries
decision analysis
participatory rural appraisal
stakeholder negotiation
q-method
sensitivity analysis
deliberative mapping
scientometric mapping
open space
cost-benefit analysis
risk assessment
interactive modelling
structured interviews
narrative-based participant observation
multi-site ethnographic-
methods
citizen’s juries
consensus conference
open hearings
dissenting opinions
multi-criteria mapping
extended foresight
stakeholder negotiation
cost-benefit analysis
risk assessment
INP
UT
S
OUTPUTS
The Dance with Power
Familiar political pressures act very strongly on Nexus methods to: justify decisions, command authority, foster trust, secure acceptance, manage blame
expert / analytic
participatory / deliberative
narrow
broad
closing down opening up
participatory appraisal
q-method open space
multicriteria mapping
participatory sensitivity
analysis
intervention futures PIPA
plural photovoice
system histories
innovation histories
INP
UT
S
OUTPUTS
Nexus thinking: from connecting to transforming…
Rigour means actively balancing incumbent pressures for justification… the most important practical Nexus capability is enabling democratic struggle