andamo vs. intermediate appellate court, 191 scra 195, november 06, 1990

Upload: raffylaguesma

Post on 23-Feb-2018

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/24/2019 Andamo vs. Intermediate Appellate Court, 191 SCRA 195, November 06, 1990

    1/6

  • 7/24/2019 Andamo vs. Intermediate Appellate Court, 191 SCRA 195, November 06, 1990

    2/6

  • 7/24/2019 Andamo vs. Intermediate Appellate Court, 191 SCRA 195, November 06, 1990

    3/6

  • 7/24/2019 Andamo vs. Intermediate Appellate Court, 191 SCRA 195, November 06, 1990

    4/6

  • 7/24/2019 Andamo vs. Intermediate Appellate Court, 191 SCRA 195, November 06, 1990

    5/6

  • 7/24/2019 Andamo vs. Intermediate Appellate Court, 191 SCRA 195, November 06, 1990

    6/6

    thecivilcase,unless,of

    course,intheeventofanacquittal

    wherethecourthasdec

    laredthatthefactfromwhichthe

    civilactionarosedidnotexist,inwhichcasetheextinction

    ofthecriminalliabilitywouldcarrywithittheextinctionof

    thecivilliability.

    InAzucenavs.Potenciano,1

    6t

    heCourtdeclaredthatin

    quasidelicts,(t)hecivilactionisentirelyindependentof

    thecriminalcaseaccord

    ingtoArticles33and2177ofthe

    CivilCode.Therecanbe

    nologicalconclusionthanthis,for

    tosubordinatethecivilactioncontemplatedinthesaid

    articlestotheresultof

    thecriminalprosecutionwhether

    itbeconvictionoracquittalwouldrendermeaninglessthe

    independentcharacter

    ofthecivilactionandtheclear

    injunction

    in

    Article3

    1,thathisaction

    mayproceed

    independentlyofthecriminalproceedingsandregardlessof

    theresultofthelatter.

    WHEREFORE,theassaileddecisiondatedFebruary17,

    1986ofthethenIntermediateAppellateCourtaffirming

    theorderofdismissalof

    theRegionalTrialCourtofCavite,

    Branch18(TagaytayCity)datedAugust17,1984ishereby

    REVERSEDandSETA

    SIDE.Thetrialcourtisorderedto

    reinstateCivilCaseN

    o.TG-748entitledNatividadV.

    AndamoandEmmanuel

    R.Andamovs.MissionariesofOur

    LadyofLaSalette,Inc.

    andtoproceedwiththehearingof

    thecasewith

    dispatc

    h.Thisdecision

    isimmediately

    executory.Costsagainst

    respondentcorporation.

    SOORDERED.

    Gutierrez,Jr.andBidin,

    JJ.,concur.

    Feliciano,

    J.,On

    leave.

    Decisionreversedand

    setaside.

    o0o

    _______________

    16No.L-14028,June30,1962,5SCRA468,470-471.

    205

    C

    opyrig

    ht2016Cen

    tra

    lBoo

    kSupp

    ly,

    Inc.

    Allrig

    htsreserve

    d.