andaleon essay 2
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Andaleon Essay 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022080220/55cf997c550346d0339da253/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Andaleon, Karen Gaile L. LS FormEssay 2
The Role of Faith and Confidence in Creation of Meaning to Life: A Synthesis of Gaudium et Spes and Nietzsche’s Philosophy
1. Compare and Contrast: Gaudium et Spes and Friedrich Nietzsche
The quest for living is the search for meaning. We human beings continue to search the
meaning in everything we do. We seek the depth of the things that occur to us. Some of us rely on
faith. Others believe we create this meaning.
The two philosophies in Gaudium et Spes and Friedrich Nietzsche deal with the depth of
one’s life. Both focus on the guidelines how to achieve a good life. They present their own
assertions relying on system they continuously uphold. They mention the sources of strength
which will make human beings powerful.
However there are more differences with the two philosophies one focusing with the
relevance of Church while the other dealing in the absence of faith. Gaudium et Spes emphasizes
about the great role of Church in bringing meaning to the life of people. It believes that through
Christ man is offered light and strength. It is the faith that puts light on everything and it directs
the mind to solutions which are fully human. Gaudium et Spes asserts that because of body and
soul, man is one. Man has the responsibility to treat his body sacred as good and honourable
since God created it. Because of sin man engages himself to destructive ways of demeaning his
body and soul. Man is given the freedom and abusing it would lead to destruction of the sanctity
of his body and soul. Conscience is considered to be the most secret core and sanctuary of a man.
In Gaudium et Spes God has allowed man to remain under the control of his own decisions to
seek his Creator spontaneously and to come to him freely. Man is personally motivated and
prompted from within and not by blind internal impulse or external pressure. Gaudium et Spes
teaches that man has been created by God for blissful purposes beyond earthly misery. Gaudium
et Spes also tackles that atheism conceals rather than reveals the authentic face of God and
1
![Page 2: Andaleon Essay 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022080220/55cf997c550346d0339da253/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
religion. Atheists claim that freedom cannot be reconciled with the affirmation of a Lord who is
the author and purpose of all things. Gaudium et Spes believes that the Church professes that all
men, believers and unbelievers alike, must work for the rightful betterment of this world. Being
part of the council he stressed on reverence for man that everyone must consider his every
neighbour without exception as another self. Gaudium et Spes asserts that human institutions
must labor to minister to the dignity and purpose of man. Men can work to better the
circumstances of their lives through a monumental amount of individual and collective effort.
Gaudium et Spes emphasizes that it is only through God that answers can be known to the
several questions we human beings keep on asking ourselves.
This belief is different from Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy as manifested in his
writings such as Beyond Good and Evil. Nietzsche claims that aesthetics is the most promising
alternative religion. Nietzsche wrote philosophy in a manner calculated to provoke serious
thought than to give formal answers to questions. Unlike the philosophy of Gaudium et Spes
which has respected the system of the Church in creating the meaning of life, Nietzsche believes
that building systems lacks integrity since honest thought must challenge precisely these self-
evident truths on which most systems are built. Nietzsche believes that philosophers must be less
pretentious and pay more attention to questions of human values than to abstract systems. He is
the proponent of the phrase “God is dead” as he was influenced by the incontrovertible fact that
belief in God has declined to a point which gives the confidence to assert such phrase. He rejects
the existence of spirit. He thought about both the collapse of religious faith and the belief in the
Darwinian notion of a relentless evolution of the species. Unlike in Gaudium et Spes which puts
paramount importance to the Church as source of truth for Nietzsche considers Christianity as
the most fatal and seductive lie that has ever existed as the greatest and most impious lie.
Nietzsche claims that Christianity contradicts nature when it requires the people to love his
enemies because it is nature’s injunction to hate his enemies. He criticized the spiritual people of
Christianity who performed services in Europe by giving comfort and courage to the suffering
because this led to the deterioration of the European race. Nietzsche proposes revaluation to
reject the traditional morality because he treats traditional morality as perversion of original
natural morality. He focuses on the internal power within individuals which is capable of shaping
2
![Page 3: Andaleon Essay 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022080220/55cf997c550346d0339da253/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
and creating events unlike Gaudium et Spes which claims Christ who serves as the cause of the
environment.
Pope Paul VI’s notion of Will of Power is represented by the Church who recognizes
Christ as the source of life. On the other hand Nietzsche’s notion of the Will of Power is
represented in the attitudes and behaviour of the Superperson. Nietzsche’s Superperson
represents the highest level of development and and expression of physical, intellectual and
emotional strength. The Superperson will be the very embodiment of the spontaneous
affirmation of life. Unlike in Gaudium et Spes which claims that it is Christ who is the source of
meaning in our life for Nietzsche it is the self that would create this meaning. One does not have
to depend on Church or Christ to seek answers to his questions about life.
3
![Page 4: Andaleon Essay 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022080220/55cf997c550346d0339da253/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2. Benefits and Disadvantages of Each Position
Gaudium et Spes may serve as inspiration for Christians because it reminds them what
they should do to achieve a good life. Pope Paul VI’s position is helpful in establishing
conformity with the Church’s teaching. Gaudium et Spes strengthens the foundation of Church’
teaching. It reminds people the importance of following Christ’s teachings. Its advice on having
good family, culture, economic development and international relationship motivate people.
Christian faith is also strengthened in Gaudium et Spes. Through Gaudium et Spes one would
realize the importance of the Church in helping them maintaining the sanctity of their life given
by Christ. Through it people can seek hope in humanity. It can lead to a faithful community
believing that through Christ and Church everything will serve its purpose meaningfully. Pope
Paul VI makes us believe that in all the events we experience whether bad or good we can rely to
Christ to be able to accept them and understand them. He helps believers to hold on to their faith
to achieve security and happiness. It is in Christ that happiness can truly be achieved.
On the other hand, Nietzsche’s philosophy is beneficial for modern thinkers who do not
believe in dogmatic system. This is helpful for secular institutions because despite lack of
spiritual motivations these institutions can find meaning in the things they pursue. His
philosophy tends to focus on the inner strength of an individual. He did not rely on any other
source of human power beyond oneself but only from the individual himself. His ideas are
beneficial in increasing one’s confidence. It gives a person the greatness to do things and
overcome the adversities he may encounter. His philosophy is helpful for people who are not
brought up believing in a certain Church.
There are also disadvantages in the philosophies presented. Too much reliance on
Christian teaching such as in Gaudium et Spes can be disadvantageous for it can be a room for
believing in every teaching of the Church even when it is already irrational. This can make
people just follow what the Church says in the hope of a good life. It becomes disadvantageous
when people do not really understand the things obligated by the Church. This can also be a
room for shallow faith because believers may only become too focused on the goal of a good life
and neglect the rationale behind it. Gaudium et Spes may also result to closed-mindedness of the
4
![Page 5: Andaleon Essay 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022080220/55cf997c550346d0339da253/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
people. Because of the claims presented by Pope Paul VI believers may discriminate ideas of
other people which are not in accordance with the Church’s doctrine. This can also be a room to
prejudice other non-believers and consider every act done by them to be immoral or sinful. If an
act done is not in accordance with the teachings of the Church one may discriminate other
despite the goodness of the act performed by the person.
Nietzsche’s philosophy may bring too much confidence to an individual which may result
to resistance in asking guidance from other people and to divine being. It can bring egotism
denying that we owe reverence to immense forces beyond ourselves. Too much freedom and
independence can also poison one soul. A person may continue doing his act in the belief that he
is doing it to be the Superperson. He may be engaged into acts which harm other people and
because of his adoption of Nietzsche’s philosophy he may lose concern with the people around
him thinking he is doing it rightly in the pursuit of his revaluation of moral system.
Nietzsche’s phrase “God is dead” is controversial especially for Christians because
saying this is tantamount to vanity of their Christian faith. His attack to the Church and its
teachings may shake the faith of the believers. It may also result to isolation because of his
emphasis to inner strength and the Superperson. People may believe that they do not need other
Supreme Being to have a good life. His failure to include God as foundation for life can lead to
hopelessness and human despair.
5
![Page 6: Andaleon Essay 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022080220/55cf997c550346d0339da253/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
3. Synthesis/ Endorsement
Being a Christian I prefer the philosophy of Gaudium et Spes because it serves as
guidance for people. It reiterates the importance of preparing one’s self for marriage because it is
crucial in bringing up children and molding them to good individuals. It reminds the important
role of parents in rearing their children. Marriage is a sacred thing that must be done with
prepared minds and hearts. Gaudium et Spes formulates the evolution human culture must have
to develop whole human person and help man in his performing his duties. It also creates depth
to the acts done by people because Gaudium et Spes reminds the Christians who are actively
participating in socio-economic development the assurance that they do this act for the prosperity
of mankind and peace of the world. It gives more meaning in the every actions people do.
Through this philosophy we visualize ourselves as person who can have a good life as long we
live in accordance with Christ’s teachings. It reminds us believers that in everything we do it is
Christ that would give us meaning. This philosophy gives us hope because the things we do have
worth and with our faith we can achieve the security and happiness that we deserve. Doubts can
be removed through our faith. Our fear can be overcome through the guidance the Church gives
us.
Nietzsche’s philosophy has merits in terms of the value it gives to an individual. His
philosophy must be used by a person to envision himself as capable of accomplishing great
things in life. One is able to entrust himself. This can be integrated to the faith people have. With
confidence in one self one becomes secured in the things he does. In security one becomes
capable of sharing himself to other people. Confidence in one’s greatness must be moderated to
avoid aggressiveness. Confidence in one self can also serve as an inspiration for other people
because confident people have more tendencies of achieving success and happiness in life. Fears
can be overcome through confidence. Life challenges can be hurdled with certainty if one carries
this moderate confidence.
With faith in Christ and confidence in oneself life happiness is more likely to be
achieved. Good relationship with the people around us can also be achieved. Positive attitude can
also result by possessing faith and confidence. The two must be balanced to be able to achieve
6
![Page 7: Andaleon Essay 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022080220/55cf997c550346d0339da253/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
the society we hope to have. Being faithful and confident must be exercised accordingly to create
the projected selves we are longing for.
7
![Page 8: Andaleon Essay 2](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022080220/55cf997c550346d0339da253/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
References: 1.Stumpf, Samuel and James Fieser. Socrates to Sartre and Beyond: A History of Philosophy
2. Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World. Gaudium et Spes.
8