and special service district councils · special resolution no. 41, 2017 - recognizes addy bray and...

5

MINUTES OF THE CITY-COUNTY COUNCILAND

SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT COUNCILSOF

INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA

REGULAR MEETINGSMONDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2017

The City-County Council of Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana and the Indianapolis PoliceSpecial Service District Council, Indianapolis Fire Special Service District Council andIndianapolis Solid Waste Collection Special Service District Council convened in regularconcurrent sessions in the Council Chamber of the City-County Building at 7:10 p.m. on Monday,December 18, 2017, with Councillor Lewis presiding.

Minority Leader McQuillen asked for a moment of silence for those who have lost their lives in2017 due to violent crime.

Councillor Johnson introduced Aaron Story, pastor of Indy Metro Church, who led the openingprayer. Councillor Johnson then invited all present to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance to theFlag.

ROLL CALL

The President instructed the Clerk to take the roll call and requested members to register theirpresence on the voting machine. The roll call was as follows:

25 PRESENT: Adamson, Clay, Coats, Cordi, Evans, Fanning, Gray, Holliday, Jackson,Johnson, Kreider, Lewis, Mascari, McHenry, McQuillen, Miller, Mowery, Oliver, Osili,Pfisterer, Ray, Robinson, Scales, Simpson, Wesseler0 ABSENT:

A quorum of 25 members being present, the President called the meeting to order.

INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS AND VISITORS

Councillor Coats recognized constituent and chair of the Telecom and Video Services AgencyBoard, Chris Smith. Councillor McHenry recognized Dr. Jeff Butts, Wayne Township SchoolSuperintendent, and Gary and Alice Poteet, westside residents and friends. Councillor Grayrecognized Jim Beard, director of the Washington Township wrestling program. Councillor Evansrecognized Sandra Squire, principal of Ben Davis High School. Councillor Pfisterer recognizedthe football team of Ben Davis High School, and the prayer caucus pastors, led by Tim Lindsey.Councillor Johnson recognized Mario Rodriguez, director of the Indianapolis Airport Authority.

Journal of the City-County Council

6

OFFICIAL COMMUNICATIONS

The President called for the reading of Official Communications. The Clerk read the following:

TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL AND POLICE, FIRE AND SOLID WASTECOLLECTION SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT COUNCILS OF THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARIONCOUNTY, INDIANA

Ladies And Gentlemen :

You are hereby notified the REGULAR MEETINGS of the City-County Council and Police, Fire and SolidWaste Collection Special Service District Councils will be held in the City-County Building, in the CouncilChambers, on Monday, December 18, 2017, at 7:00 p.m., the purpose of such MEETINGS being to conductany and all business that may properly come before regular meetings of the Councils.

Respectfully,s/Maggie A. LewisPresident, City-County Council

December 1, 2017

TO PRESIDENT LEWIS AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL AND POLICE, FIRE ANDSOLID WASTE COLLECTION SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT COUNCILS OF THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLISAND MARION COUNTY, INDIANA:

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to the laws of the State of Indiana, I caused to be published in the Court & Commercial Record andin the Indianapolis Star on Wednesday, December 6, 2017 a copy of a Notice of Public Hearing on ProposalNos. 357 and 384, 2017, said hearing to be held on Monday, December 18, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. in the PublicAssembly Room of the City-County Building.

Respectfully,s/NaTrina DeBowClerk of the City-County Council

December 14, 2017

TO PRESIDENT LEWIS AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL AND POLICE, FIRE ANDSOLID WASTE COLLECTION SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT COUNCILS OF THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLISAND MARION COUNTY, INDIANA:

Ladies and Gentlemen:

I have approved with my signature and delivered this day to the Clerk of the City-County Council, NaTrinaDeBow, the following ordinances:

FISCAL ORDINANCE NO. 39, 2017 - approves an additional appropriation of $135,000 in the 2017 Budgetof the Department of Business and Neighborhood Services (Consolidated County General Fund) to pay wagesand benefits of four additional staff to Indianapolis Animal Care Services

FISCAL ORDINANCE NO. 40, 2017 - approves a transfer of $600,000 and an additional appropriation of$279,334 in the 2017 Budget of the Information Services Agency (Information Services and Enhanced AccessFunds) to cover new technology projects for the Department of Metropolitan Development and the ElectionBoard and to cover the cost of an enterprise storage solution

FISCAL ORDINANCE NO. 44, 2017 - approves an additional appropriation and transfer of $84,240 in the2017 Budget of the Marion County Public Defender Agency (County General Fund) to purchase panel systemworkspaces for additional TPR/CHINS teams and for reimbursement of expenses for capital and life withoutparole cases

FISCAL ORDINANCE NO. 45, 2017 - approves an additional appropriation of $1,528,000 in the 2017 Budgetof the Department of Public Works (Transportation General and Solid Waste Collection General Funds) tofulfill projected personnel costs through the end of 2017

FISCAL ORDINANCE NO. 47, 2017 - approves a transfer in the 2017 Budget of the Office of Audit andPerformance (Consolidated County Fund) for the purchase of audit management software

GENERAL ORDINANCE NO. 64, 2017 - adds a new chapter to the Code regarding allocation of propertytaxes paid on property transferred by certain entities

December 18, 2017

7

GENERAL ORDINANCE NO. 65, 2017 - amends the Code to restructure plan review fees for constructionand renovation of Class 1 structures and to authorize the board of business and neighborhood services toreduce license and permit fees

GENERAL ORDINANCE NO. 66, 2017 - amends the Code to increase the value that the real property musthave to necessitate approval of the fiscal body for transfer under IC 36-1-11-3 or IC 36-1-11-5

GENERAL ORDINANCE NO. 67, 2017 – authorizes intersection controls at Asbury Street and LawrenceAvenue (District 24)

GENERAL ORDINANCE NO. 68, 2017 – authorizes intersection controls at Hudson Street and Alley 1050North (District 17)

GENERAL ORDINANCE NO. 69, 2017 – authorizes intersection controls at Ridgeview Drive and 13th Street(District 19)

GENERAL ORDINANCE NO. 70, 2017 – authorizes a speed limit reduction to 25 miles per hour in theDawnbury subdivision (District 2)

GENERAL ORDINANCE NO. 71, 2017 – authorizes intersection controls at Dukane Way and Dunn Way(District 22

GENERAL ORDINANCE NO. 72, 2017 – authorizes restricted parking at the corners of Delaware Street and23rd Street and Delaware Street and 24th Street (District 11)

GENERAL ORDINANCE NO. 73, 2017 - authorizes restricted parking on Regent Street from Cole Street tothe east termination point (District 22)

SPECIAL ORDINANCE NO. 9, 2017 - authorizes the issuance of Economic Development Tax IncrementRevenue Bonds in an amount not to exceed $4,200,000 to Goodwill of Central and Southern Indiana, Inc., tofinance a portion of the funds for the acquisition, construction, and equipping of a four-story building, including208 workforce housing apartment units, on-site parking for tenants, a fitness center, and outdoor recreationalfacilities known as the Goodwill Riverview Project at Michigan Street and White River Parkway Drive (District16), and approves and authorizes other actions in respect thereto

GENERAL RESOLUTION NO. 17, 2017 - approves the Metropolitan Development Commission's resolutionterminating the Tibbs Avenue Redevelopment Area and the Allocation Area

GENERAL RESOLUTION NO. 18, 2017 - approves the statement of benefits of Infosys Limited, an applicantfor tax abatement for property located in an economic revitalization area

GENERAL RESOLUTION NO. 19, 2017 - approves the Metropolitan Development Commission's preliminarydesignation of the Goodwill Riverview Economic Development and Allocation Area

GENERAL RESOLUTION NO. 20, 2017 - authorizes the board of commissioners of Marion County to disposeof certain parcels that have an appraised value of $50,000 or more

GENERAL RESOLUTION NO. 23, 2017 – determines the need to lease 3,142 square feet of space at 2011North Meridian Street for use by the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department

GENERAL RESOLUTION NO. 24, 2017 – determines the need to lease 4,074 square feet of space at 2703E. 25th Street for use by the Marion County Public Defender Agency

GENERAL RESOLUTION NO. 25, 2017 - approves certain public purpose grants totaling $304,786 from theDrug Free Community Fund

GENERAL RESOLUTION NO. 26, 2017 - approves a request of the Department of Public Works to purchasecertain real estate interests for construction of a public works project

GENERAL RESOLUTION NO. 27, 2017 - approves a public lighting contract with Indianapolis Power andLight

SPECIAL RESOLUTION NO. 41, 2017 - recognizes Addy Bray and Linda Znachko

SPECIAL RESOLUTION NO. 42, 2017 - honors Andy Harris as the 2017 Indiana Trustee of the Year

SPECIAL RESOLUTION NO. 43, 2017 - recognizes the 19th Annual Breakfast with Santa

s/Joseph H. Hogsett, Mayor


8

ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA

The President proposed the adoption of the agenda as distributed. Without objection, the agendawas adopted.

Councillor Clay asked for consent, as the sponsor of Proposal No. 384, 2017, to withdraw thatproposal, which is currently listed under Pending Items. Consent was given.

APPROVAL OF THE JOURNAL

The President called for additions or corrections to the Journals of December 4, 2017. There beingno additions or corrections, the minutes were approved as distributed.

PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS, MEMORIALS, SPECIAL RESOLUTIONS, ANDCOUNCIL RESOLUTIONS

PROPOSAL NO. 419, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillors Evans, McHenry, Pfistererand Lewis, recognizes the Ben Davis High School Giants football team for their 2017 Indiana HighSchool Athletic Association (IHSAA) 6A State Championship win. Councillors Evans, McHenry,and Pfisterer read the proposal and presented representatives with copies of the document andCouncil pins. Head Coach Mike Kirschner and team member Tommy McDonald thanked theCouncil for the recognition. Councillor Evans moved, seconded by Councillor McHenry, foradoption. Proposal No. 419, 2017 was adopted by a unanimous voice vote.

Proposal No. 419, 2017 was retitled SPECIAL RESOLUTION NO. 44 , 2017, and reads as follows:

CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL SPECIAL RESOLUTION NO. 44, 2017

A SPECIAL RESOLUTION recognizing the Ben Davis High School Giants football team for their 2017 Indiana HighSchool Athletic Association (IHSAA) 6A State Championship win.

WHEREAS, the Ben Davis Giants won the 2017 IHSAA 6A State Championship game on November 25, 2017 bydefeating Mishawaka Penn by a score of 63-14, capping off a 13-0 season; and

WHEREAS, the Giants averaged 46.2 points per game. The Giants played two close games in the tournament, whichled to sectional wins over Lawrence Central (33-20) and Warren Central (36-29), and steamrolling Fishers (50-7) andAvon (57-20); and

WHEREAS, the Giants have an impressive team record of most points (63), most combined points (77), most passescompleted (20), most passing yards (365), most passing touchdowns (6) and the highest punting average (45.5) just toname a few; and

WHEREAS, their individual records are just as impressive. Most PAT kicks (6) by Isaac Thomas; longesttouchdown run (76), most passing yards (340), and most passing touchdowns (6) by Reese Taylor; most receiving yards(109) and most touchdown receptions (3) by Broc Thompson; highest punting average (45.5) by Tyrese Nibbs; andlongest punt return (18) by Kesean Tunstill; and

WHEREAS, the Giants were the Sectional, Regional and Semi-state Champions 2014-2017, the MIC ConferenceChamps in 2017 and State Champions in 2014 and 2017; and

WHEREAS, the Giants are led by Head Coach Mike Kirschner, who is a 1979 graduate from Warren Central HighSchool, where he was a two-year letterman in football. Coach Kirschner does not just coach the Giants, he is a mentorand friend. He is supported by assistant coaches Mark Zachery, Justin Faires, Dan Schwanekamp, Chuck Schwanekamp,Terry Siddall, Dustin Stewart, Brett Waller, Brian Abney, Brandon Johnson, and Jay Douglas; and

December 18, 2017

9

WHEREAS, not only are the young men great at playing football and setting team and individual records, twoSeniors on the team also stand-out academically as well. Tommy McDonald (who is the 2017 Phil Eskew Mental AttitudeState Champion Award winner) ranks #1 out of 1,044 students holding a GPA of 5.1096 and is the school’s Valedictorian,who wants to be an Engineer; and Owen Price, who ranks #2 out of 1,044 students holding a GPA of 5.0942 and is theschool’s Salutatorian and also wants to be an Engineer; now, therefore:

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND OF MARION COUNTY, INDIANA:

SECTION 1. The Indianapolis City-County Council proudly recognizes the Ben Davis High School Giants Footballteam for winning the 2017 IHSAA 6A State Championship.

SECTION 2. The Council extends its congratulations to the entire team, coaching staff and school administration ontheir achievement and wishes each player great success in their future endeavors, both athletically and academically.

SECTION 3. The Mayor is invited to join in this resolution by affixing his signature hereto.

SECTION 4. This resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption and compliance with IC 36-3-4-14.

Councillor Osili reported that the Metropolitan and Economic Development Committee heardProposal Nos. 347, 349, 354, 355, 382 and 383, 2017 on December 11, 2017.

PROPOSAL NO. 347, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillors Osili and Lewis, reappointsBrian Barton to the Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals. By a 7-0 vote, the Committeereported the proposal to the Council with the recommendation that it do pass. Councillor Osilimoved, seconded by Councillor Adamson, for adoption. Proposal No. 347, 2017 was adopted onthe following roll call vote; viz:

22 YEAS: Adamson, Clay, Coats, Cordi, Fanning, Gray, Holliday, Jackson, Johnson, Kreider,Lewis, Mascari, McQuillen, Miller, Mowery, Oliver, Osili, Ray, Robinson, Scales, Simpson,Wesseler0 NAYS:3 NOT VOTING: Evans, McHenry, Pfisterer

Proposal No. 347, 2017 was retitled COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 65, 2017, and reads asfollows:

CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 65, 2017

A COUNCIL RESOLUTION reappointing Brian Barton to the Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals.


SECTION 1. As a member of the Property Tax Assessment Board of Appeals, the Council reappoints:

Brian Barton

SECTION 2. The reappointment made by this resolution is for a term ending December 31, 2018. The person appointedby this resolution shall serve at the pleasure of the Council and for sixty (60) days after the expiration of such term or untilsuch earlier date as successor is appointed and qualifies.

PROPOSAL NO. 349, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillors Osili and Lewis, reappointsLena Hackett to the Metropolitan Development Commission. By a 7-0 vote, the Committeereported the proposal to the Council with the recommendation that it do pass. Councillor Osilimoved, seconded by Councillor Adamson, for adoption. Proposal No. 349, 2017 was adopted onthe following roll call vote; viz:


10

19 YEAS: Adamson, Clay, Coats, Cordi, Fanning, Gray, Jackson, Johnson, Kreider, Lewis,Mascari, McQuillen, Miller, Oliver, Osili, Ray, Robinson, Scales, Simpson3 NAYS: Holliday, Mowery, Wesseler3 NOT VOTING: Evans, McHenry, Pfisterer



A COUNCIL RESOLUTION reappointing Lena Hackett to the Metropolitan Development Commission.


SECTION 1. As a member of the Metropolitan Development Commission, the Council reappoints:

Lena Hackett

SECTION 2. The reappointment made by this resolution is for a term ending December 31, 2018. The person appointed bythis resolution shall serve at the pleasure of the Council and for sixty (60) days after the expiration of such term or until suchearlier date as successor is appointed and qualifies.

Councillor Osili asked for consent to vote on Proposal Nos. 354 and 355, 2017 together. Consentwas given.

PROPOSAL NO. 354, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Adamson, reappoints LindaGilkerson to the Woodruff Place Economic Improvement Board. PROPOSAL NO. 355, 2017.The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Adamson, reappoints Charles Neill to the Woodruff PlaceEconomic Improvement Board. By 7-0 votes, the Committee reported the proposals to the Councilwith the recommendation that they do pass and do pass as amended, respectively. Councillor Osilimoved, seconded by Councillor Adamson, for adoption. Proposal Nos. 354 and 355, 2017 wereadopted on the following roll call vote; viz:




A COUNCIL RESOLUTION reappointing Linda Gilkerson to the Woodruff Place Economic Improvement Board.


SECTION 1. As a member of the Woodruff Place Economic Improvement Board, the Council reappoints:

Linda Gilkerson

SECTION 2. The reappointment made by this resolution is for a term ending December 31, 2020. The person appointedby this resolution shall serve at the pleasure of the Council until his or her successor is appointed and qualifies.

December 18, 2017

11



A COUNCIL RESOLUTION reappointing Charles Neill to the Woodruff Place Economic Improvement Board.


SECTION 1. As a member of the Woodruff Place Economic Improvement Board, the Council reappoints:

Charles Neill

SECTION 2. The reappointment made by this resolution is for a term ending December 31, 2020. The person appointedby this resolution shall serve at the pleasure of the Council until his or her successor is appointed and qualifies.

Councillor Osili asked for consent to vote on Proposal Nos. 382 and 383, 2017 together. Consentwas given.

PROPOSAL NO. 382, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillors Osili and Lewis, appointsStacie Hurrle to the Animal Services Advisory Board. PROPOSAL NO. 383, 2017. The proposal,sponsored by Councillors Osili and Lewis, appoints Christian Mosburg to the Animal ServicesAdvisory Board. By 7-0 votes, the Committee reported the proposals to the Council with therecommendation that they do pass. Councillor Osili moved, seconded by Councillor Adamson, foradoption. Proposal Nos. 382 and 383, 2017 were adopted on the following roll call vote; viz:




A COUNCIL RESOLUTION appointing Stacie Hurrle to the Animal Services Advisory Board.


SECTION 1. As a member of the Animal Services Advisory Board (fulfilling the requirement of a Health and Hospitalrepresentative appointment), the Council appoints:

Stacie Hurrle

SECTION 2. The appointment made by this resolution is for a term ending December 31, 2018. The person appointedby this resolution shall serve at the pleasure of the Council and for sixty (60) days after the expiration of such term or untilsuch earlier date as successor is appointed and qualifies.



12


A COUNCIL RESOLUTION appointing Christian Mosburg to the Animal Services Advisory Board.


SECTION 1. As a member of the Animal Services Advisory Board (fulfilling the requirement of a community memberappointment), the Council appoints:

Christian Mosburg

SECTION 2. The appointment made by this resolution is for a term ending December 31, 2018. The person appointedby this resolution shall serve at the pleasure of the Council and for sixty (60) days after the expiration of such term or untilsuch earlier date as successor is appointed and qualifies.

Councillor Gray reported that the Municipal Corporations Committee heard Proposal Nos. 363 and364, 2017 on December 13, 2017. He asked for consent to vote on these proposals together.Consent was given.

PROPOSAL NO. 363, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillors Lewis and Gray, reappointsJoyce Rogers to the Marion County Health and Hospital Corporation Board of Trustees.PROPOSAL NO. 364, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillors Gray and Lewis, reappointsGregory Bedan to the Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation Board of Directors. By 6-0votes, the Committee reported the proposals to the Council with the recommendation that they dopass.

Councillor Jackson said that, although Ms. Rogers was not able to attend the meeting for herreappointment, her resume, which was included in the meeting packet was very impressive, andshe is highly qualified to serve in this capacity.

Councillor Gray moved, seconded by Councillor Evans, for adoption. Proposal Nos. 363 and 364,2017 were adopted on the following roll call vote; viz:

25 YEAS: Adamson, Clay, Coats, Cordi, Evans, Fanning, Gray, Holliday, Jackson, Johnson,Kreider, Lewis, Mascari, McHenry, McQuillen, Miller, Mowery, Oliver, Osili, Pfisterer, Ray,Robinson, Scales, Simpson, Wesseler0 NAYS:



A COUNCIL RESOLUTION reappointing Joyce Rogers to the Marion County Health and Hospital Corporation Boardof Trustees.


SECTION 1. As a member of the Marion County Health and Hospital Corporation Board of Trustees, the Councilreappoints:

Joyce Rogers

SECTION 2. There appointment made by this resolution is at the pleasure of the Council for a term ending December31, 2021, or until a successor is appointed and qualified.

December 18, 2017

13



A COUNCIL RESOLUTION reappointing Gregory Bedan to the Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation Board ofDirectors.


SECTION 1. As a member of the Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation Board of Directors (fulfilling therequirement of a user appointment), the Council reappoints:

Gregory Bedan

SECTION 2.The reappointment made by this resolution is for a term ending December 31, 2021. The person appointed bythis resolution shall serve at the pleasure of the Council and for sixty (60) days after the expiration of such term or until suchearlier date as successor is appointed and qualifies.

Councillor Robinson reported that the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Committee heardProposal Nos. 367, 368, 370, 371, and 378-381, 2017 on December 6, 2017. He asked for consentto vote on these proposals together. Consent was given.

PROPOSAL NO. 367, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillors Robinson and Lewis,reappoints Brandon Randall to the Juvenile Detention Center Advisory Board. PROPOSAL NO.368, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillors Robinson and Scales, reappoints JasonDeArman to the Citizens Police Complaint Board. PROPOSAL NO. 370, 2017. The proposal,sponsored by Councillors Robinson and Lewis, reappoints Bill Moreau to the Reuben EngagementCenter Board. PROPOSAL NO. 371, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillors Robinsonand Lewis, reappoints Lynnea Redmon-Williams to the Reuben Engagement Center Board.PROPOSAL NO. 378, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Robinson, reappoints MichaelMedler to the Domestic Violence Fatality Review Team. PROPOSAL NO. 379, 2017. Theproposal, sponsored by Councillors Robinson and Lewis, reappoints Jeffrey Catlett to the EarlyIntervention Planning Council. PROPOSAL NO. 380, 2017. The proposal, sponsored byCouncillors Robinson and Lewis, reappoints Blake Johnson to the Early Intervention PlanningCouncil. PROPOSAL NO. 381, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillors Robinson andLewis, reappoints Marilyn Pfisterer to the Early Intervention Planning Council. By 8-0 votes, theCommittee reported the proposals to the Council with the recommendation that they do pass.Councillor Robinson moved, seconded by Councillor Adamson, for adoption. Proposal Nos. 367,368, 370, 371, and 378-381, 2017 were adopted on the following roll call vote; viz:




A COUNCIL RESOLUTION reappointing Brandon Randall to the Juvenile Detention Center Advisory Board.


14


SECTION 1. As a member of the Juvenile Detention Center Advisory Board, the Council reappoints:

Brandon Randall




A COUNCIL RESOLUTION reappointing Jason DeArman to the Citizens Police Complaint Board.


SECTION 1. As a member of the Citizens Police Complaint Board, the Council reappoints:

Jason DeArman

SECTION 2. The reappointment made by this resolution is for a term ending December 31, 2020. The person appointed bythis resolution shall serve at the pleasure of the Council and for sixty (60) days after the expiration of such term or until suchearlier date as successor is appointed and qualifies.



A COUNCIL RESOLUTION reappointing Bill Moreau to the Reuben Engagement Center Board.


SECTION 1. As a member of the Reuben Engagement Center Board, fulfilling the requirement of a Reuben Estaterepresentative appointment, the Council reappoints:

Bill Moreau




A COUNCIL RESOLUTION reappointing Lynnea Redmon-Williams to the Reuben Engagement Center Board.


December 18, 2017

15

SECTION 1. As a member of the Reuben Engagement Center Board, fulfilling the requirement of a professional serviceprovider appointment, the Council reappoints:

Lynnea Redmon-Williams




A COUNCIL RESOLUTION reappointing Michael Medler to the Domestic Violence Fatality Review Team.


SECTION 1. As a member of the Domestic Violence Fatality Review Team (fulfilling the requirement of a forensicservices appointment), the Council reappoints:

Michael Medler




A COUNCIL RESOLUTION reappointing Jeffrey Catlett to the Early Intervention Planning Council.


SECTION 1. As a member of the Early Intervention Planning Council (mental health representative), theCouncil reappoints:

Jeffrey Catlett

SECTION 2. The reappointment made by this resolution is for a term ending December 31, 2019. The personappointed by this resolution shall serve at the pleasure of the Council and for sixty (60) days after theexpiration of such term or until such earlier date as successor is appointed and qualifies.



A COUNCIL RESOLUTION reappointing Blake Johnson to the Early Intervention Planning Council.



16

SECTION 1. As a member of the Early Intervention Planning Council, the Council reappoints:

Blake Johnson

SECTION 2. The reappointment made by this resolution is for a term ending December 31, 2018. The person appointedby this resolution shall serve at the pleasure of the Council and for sixty (60) days after the expiration of such term oruntil such earlier date as successor is appointed and qualifies.



A COUNCIL RESOLUTION reappointing Marilyn Pfisterer to the Early Intervention Planning Council.


SECTION 1. As a member of the Early Intervention Planning Council, the Council reappoints:

Marilyn Pfisterer

SECTION 2. The reappointment made by this resolution is for a term ending December 31, 2018. The person appointedby this resolution shall serve at the pleasure of the Council and for sixty (60) days after the expiration of such term oruntil such earlier date as successor is appointed and qualifies.

INTRODUCTION OF PROPOSALS

PROPOSAL NO. 411, 2017. Introduced by Councillors Simpson, Lewis and Gray. The Clerk readthe proposal entitled: "A Proposal for a General Resolution which authorizes the issuance of notesin an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $55,000,000 for the purpose of providing funds tobe applied to the costs of site preparation, construction mobilization, and related engineering,planning, design and consulting in connection with a proposed community justice campus, andappropriating the proceeds thereof, states the Council’s interest in making a purchase of land,ratifying the appointment of appraisers with respect to the purchase of land, states the need to leasecertain property and waives the application of Revised Code Chapter 186 with respect to thepurchased land and/or leased property"; and the President referred it to the Administration andFinance Committee.

PROPOSAL NO. 412, 2017. Introduced by Councillors Clay, Simpson, Oliver, Jackson and Scales.The Clerk read the proposal entitled: "A Proposal for a Fiscal Ordinance which approves anadditional appropriation of $300,000 in the 2018 Budget of the Office of Public Health and Safety(Consolidated County General Fund) to cover the cost of witness protection"; and the Presidentreferred it to the Public Safety and Criminal Justice Committee.

PROPOSAL NO. 413, 2017. Introduced by Councillor Adamson. The Clerk read the proposalentitled: "A Proposal for a General Ordinance which authorizes intersection controls at Spring andWalnut Streets (District 17)"; and the President referred it to the Public Works Committee.

PROPOSAL NO. 414, 2017. Introduced by Councillor Cordi. The Clerk read the proposal entitled:"A Proposal for a General Ordinance which authorizes weight limit restrictions on Pasadena Street(District 18)"; and the President referred it to the Public Works Committee.

December 18, 2017

17

PROPOSAL NO. 415, 2017. Introduced by Councillor Cordi. The Clerk read the proposal entitled:"A Proposal for a General Ordinance which authorizes a speed limit reduction to 25 miles per houron Pasadena Street (District 18)"; and the President referred it to the Public Works Committee.

PROPOSAL NO. 416, 2017. Introduced by Councillor Johnson. The Clerk read the proposalentitled: "A Proposal for a General Ordinance which authorizes intersection controls at JulianAvenue and Irvington Avenue (District 12)"; and the President referred it to the Public WorksCommittee.

PROPOSAL NO. 417, 2017. Introduced by Councillor Mowery. The Clerk read the proposalentitled: "A Proposal for a General Ordinance which authorizes intersection controls at Dill Courtand Sycamore Run Drive (District 25)"; and the President referred it to the Public WorksCommittee.

PROPOSAL NO. 418, 2017. Introduced by Councillor Fanning. The Clerk read the proposalentitled: "A Proposal for a General Ordinance which authorizes intersection controls at EvanstonAvenue and Burch Drive (District 2)"; and the President referred it to the Public Works Committee.

SPECIAL ORDERS - PRIORITY BUSINESS

PROPOSAL NO. 410, 2017. Councillor Osili reported that the Metropolitan and EconomicDevelopment Committee heard Proposal No. 410, 2017 on December 11, 2017. The proposal,sponsored by Councillor Fanning, approves the issuance of economic development tax incrementrevenue bonds in an approximate aggregate amount not to exceed $2,665,000 for the River HouseBroad Ripple Project in order to provide a portion of the costs of acquisition, construction,equipping and preservation of a six-story, mixed-use apartment building consisting of 87 apartmentunits, rooftop amenity deck, 4,996 square feet of office space, and structured parking located at6311 Westfield Boulevard (District 2), and other expenses related thereto. By a 5-0 vote, theCommittee reported the proposal to the Council with the recommendation that it do pass.

Councillor Fanning said that there were no known remonstrators on this project, which is unusualfor development in Broad Ripple. She said that this is due mostly to the developer working hardfor two and a half years to respond to the needs and desires of the community. This intersection isone of the worst intersections in the City and is a major public safety concern. The developer hastaken it upon himself to fix that trail and add public lighting, to make the intersection safer andmuch more user-friendly. They have also pledged to double the public art in this area and havegone above and beyond to make sure the public good is served. She said that the project is a win-win for everyone, leaving the Midtown Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district healthier; and shewould appreciate her fellow Councillors’ support.

Councillor Osili moved, seconded by Councillor Fanning, for adoption. Proposal No. 410, 2017was adopted on the following roll call vote; viz:

24 YEAS: Adamson, Clay, Coats, Cordi, Evans, Fanning, Gray, Holliday, Jackson, Johnson,Kreider, Lewis, Mascari, McHenry, McQuillen, Miller, Mowery, Oliver, Osili, Pfisterer, Ray,Robinson, Simpson, Wesseler1 NAY: Scales


18

Proposal No. 410, 2017 was retitled SPECIAL ORDINANCE NO. 10, 2017, and reads as follows:

CITY-COUNTY SPECIAL ORDINANCE NO. 10, 2017

A SPECIAL ORDINANCE authorizing the City of Indianapolis, Indiana, to issue one or more series of its City of Indianapolis,Indiana, Economic Development Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Series 2017 (Federally Taxable – River House Broad RippleProject) (with such further series or other designation as determined to be necessary, desirable or appropriate), in a maximumaggregate principal amount not to exceed Two Million Six Hundred Sixty-Five Thousand Dollars ($2,665,000), approvingthe issuance of special taxing district bonds of the Redevelopment District of the City of Indianapolis, Indiana (the “District”),to be issued in one or more series or issues, for the purpose of providing funds to pay the costs of the Project (as defined herein)and approving and authorizing other actions in respect thereto.

WHEREAS, Indiana Code 36-7-11.9 and 12 (collectively, the “Act”) declares that the financing and refinancing ofeconomic development facilities constitutes a public purpose; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the City of Indianapolis, Indiana (the “City”) is authorized to issue revenue bondsfor the purpose of financing, reimbursing or refinancing the costs of acquisition, construction, renovation, installationand equipping of economic development facilities in order to foster diversification of economic development and creationor retention of opportunities for gainful employment in or near the City; and

WHEREAS, River House Broad Ripple, LLC, and/or one or more subsidiaries, affiliates or joint ventures thereof (the“Developer”) desires to finance certain projects, additions or improvements within the City, including all or any portion of:(a) the acquisition, construction, equipping and preservation of a 6-story mixed-use apartment building consisting of 87apartment units, rooftop amenity deck, 4,496 square feet of office space and a structured parking facility; and (b) allacquisition, construction, demolition, renovation, improvement, excavation, utility relocation and/or equipping costsrelated to the projects described in clause (a), including, but not limited to certain streetscape and landscape projects andimprovements (collectively, the “Project”); and

WHEREAS, the Project will be located at approximately 6311 Westfield Boulevard, Indianapolis, Indiana, which is in City-County Council District 2, and is, or will be, located in. serving or physically connected to an allocation area, known as theNorth Midtown Allocation Area (the “Allocation Area”), previously created by the Metropolitan Development Commission ofMarion County, Indiana (the “Metropolitan Development Commission”), acting as the Redevelopment Commission of the City;and

WHEREAS, the Developer has advised the Indianapolis Economic Development Commission (the “EconomicDevelopment Commission”) and the City concerning the Project, and has requested that the City issue one or more seriesof its taxable or tax-exempt Economic Development Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Series 2017 (with such further ordifferent series designation as may be necessary, desirable or appropriate, including such series designation to indicatethe year in which the bonds are issued) (the “Bonds”), in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed Two Million SixHundred Sixty-Five Thousand Dollars ($2,665,000), for the purpose of providing funds for (i) paying all or a portion ofthe costs of the Project by making a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds available to the Developer and (ii) paying allincidental expenses incurred on account of the issuance of the Bonds; and

WHEREAS, the Economic Development Commission has rendered a report concerning the proposed financing ofthe Project as an economic development facility for the Developer and the Metropolitan Development Commission, asPlan Commission, and the Superintendent of the Indianapolis Public Schools have been given the opportunity to commentthereon; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 24 of the Act, following a public hearing held on December 6, 2017, the EconomicDevelopment Commission found that the financing of the Project complies with the purposes and provisions of the Actand that such financing will be of benefit to the health and welfare of the City; and

WHEREAS, the Economic Development Commission has determined that the financing will not have an adversecompetitive effect or impact on any similar facility or facility of the same kind already constructed or operating in thesame market area or in or about Marion County, Indiana; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the Act, the City desires to provide funds necessary to finance allor a portion of the Project by issuing the Bonds; and

WHEREAS, the Act provides that such revenue bonds may be secured by a trust indenture between an issuer and acorporate trustee; and

December 18, 2017

19

WHEREAS, the City intends to issue the Bonds consistent with the terms of this Ordinance and pursuant to a TrustIndenture, to be dated the first day of the month in which the Bonds are sold or delivered (or such other date as theofficers of the City may hereafter approve) (the “Indenture”), by and between the City and a corporate trustee to beselected by the City (the “Trustee”), in order to obtain funds necessary to provide for the financing of all or a portionof the Project, in accordance with the terms of a Financing Agreement, to be dated the first day of the month in whichthe Bonds are sold or delivered (or such other date as the officers of the City may hereafter approve) (the “FinancingAgreement”), by and between the City and the Developer with respect to the Bonds and the Project, and a ProjectAgreement (as defined herein) between the City and the Developer, with respect to the Bonds and Project, and othersuch documents as deemed necessary; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Financing Agreement, the Developer will make certain representations, warranties andcommitments with respect to the Project and the use of the proceeds of the Bonds to be provided to the Developer inaccordance with the terms thereof; and

WHEREAS, no member of the City-County Council has any pecuniary interest in any employment, financingagreement or other contract made under the provisions of the Act and related to the Bonds authorized herein, whichpecuniary interest has not been fully disclosed to the City-County Council and no such member has voted on any suchmatter, all in accordance with the provisions of Indiana Code 36-7-12-16; and

WHEREAS, the Economic Development Commission has heretofore approved the forms of the Bonds, theIndenture and the Financing Agreement (collectively, the “Financing Documents”), and approved and recommendedthe City-County Council’s adoption of a form of this proposed Ordinance, which were incorporated by reference in theEconomic Development Commission’s Resolution adopted on December 6, 2017, which Resolution has beentransmitted hereto; and

WHEREAS, the Bonds will be payable from only a maximum pledge of eighty percent (80%) of the incrementalproperty tax revenues derived from the Project as discussed below; and

WHEREAS, prior to the issuance of the Bonds, the Metropolitan Development Commission will pledge up to eightypercent (80%) of the tax increment revenues (the “TIF Revenues”) from the Project to the payment of the Bonds on asubordinate basis after prior payment of existing bonds to which such TIF Revenues are pledged and that the pledge ofTIF Revenues will not exceed the debt service on the Bonds; and

WHEREAS, based upon the resolution adopted by the Economic Development Commission pertaining to theProject, the City-County Council hereby finds and determines that the funding approved by the EconomicDevelopment Commission for all or a portion of the Project will be of benefit to the health and general welfare ofthe citizens of the City, complies with the provisions of the Act and the amount necessary to finance all or a portionof the costs of the Project, together with incidental expenses incurred in connection therewith, will require theissuance, sale and delivery of one or more series of economic development tax increment revenue bonds in anaggregate combined principal amount not to exceed Two Million Six Hundred Sixty-Five Thousand Dollars($2,665,000).

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND OF MARION COUNTY, INDIANA:

SECTION 1. It is hereby found, determined, ratified and confirmed that the financing of the economic developmentfacilities referred to in the Financing Documents consisting of the Project, the issuance and sale of the Bonds, and theuse of the net proceeds thereof by the Developer to finance all or a portion of the Project, will: (i) result in thediversification of industry, the creation or retention of business opportunities and the creation or retention ofopportunities for gainful employment within the jurisdiction of the City; (ii) serve a public purpose, and will be ofbenefit to the health and general welfare of the City; (iii) comply with the purposes and provisions of the Act and it isin the public interest that the City take such lawful action as determined to be necessary or desirable to encourage thediversification of industry, the creation or retention of business opportunities, and the creation or retention ofopportunities for gainful employment within the jurisdiction of the City; and (iv) not have a material adversecompetitive effect on any similar facilities already constructed or operating in or near the City.

SECTION 2. The forms of the Financing Documents presented herewith are hereby approved and all such documentsshall be kept on file by the Clerk of the City-County Council (the “Clerk”) or the Controller of the City (the “Controller”).In compliance with Indiana Code 36-1-5-4, two (2) copies of the Financing Documents are on file in the office of theClerk for public inspection.


20

SECTION 3. The City is authorized to issue the Bonds in one or more series, any series of which may be taxable forfederal income tax purposes, in the maximum aggregate principal amount not to exceed Two Million Six Hundred Sixty-Five Thousand Dollars ($2,665,000), with a maximum term not to exceed twenty-five (25) years and with a maximuminterest rate not to exceed five percent (5%) per annum, for the purpose of procuring funds to (i) pay all or a portion ofthe costs of the Project by making a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds available to the Developer and (ii) pay allincidental expenses incurred on account of the issuance of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be payable as to principal andinterest solely from an eighty percent (80%) pledge of the TIF Revenues on a subordinate basis, upon such terms andconditions as otherwise provided in the Financing Documents and this Ordinance. The Bonds shall never constitute ageneral obligation of, an indebtedness of, or charge against the general credit of the City.

SECTION 4. The Mayor and the Clerk are authorized and directed to execute the Financing Documents, and the Mayor, theController, the Clerk and any other officer of the City are authorized and directed to execute such other documents approvedor authorized herein and any other document which may be necessary, appropriate or desirable to consummate the transactioncontemplated by the Financing Documents and this Ordinance, and their execution is hereby confirmed on behalf of the City.The signatures of the Mayor and the Clerk on the Bonds which may be necessary or desirable to consummate the transaction,and their execution is hereby confirmed on behalf of the City. The signatures of the Mayor and the Clerk on the Bonds maybe facsimile signatures. The Mayor, the Clerk, the Controller and any other officer of the City are authorized to arrange forthe delivery of the Bonds to the purchaser, payment for which will be made in the manner set forth in the Financing Documents.The Mayor and the Clerk may, by their execution of the Financing Documents requiring their signatures and imprinting oftheir facsimile signatures thereon, approve any and all such changes therein and also in those Financing Documents which donot require the signature of the Mayor or the Clerk without further approval of this City-County Council or the EconomicDevelopment Commission if such changes do not affect terms set forth in Sections 27(a)(1) through and including (a)(10) ofthe Act.

SECTION 5. The provisions of this Ordinance and the Financing Documents shall constitute a contract binding between theCity and the holder or holders of the Bonds and after the issuance of said Bonds, this Ordinance shall not be repealed or amendedin any respect which would adversely affect the right of such holder or holders so long as said Bonds or the interest thereonremains unpaid.

SECTION 6. The Mayor, the Controller and the Clerk, or any other officer having responsibility with respect to the issuanceof the Bonds, are authorized and directed, alone or in conjunction with any of the foregoing, or with any other officer,employee, consultant or agent of the City, to deliver a certificate for inclusion in the transcript of proceedings for the Bonds,setting forth the facts, estimates and circumstances and reasonable expectations pertaining to the use of the Bond proceeds asof the date of issuance thereof.

SECTION 7. No recourse under or upon any obligation, covenant, acceptance or agreement contained in this Ordinance, theFinancing Documents or under any judgment obtained against the City, including without limitation its EconomicDevelopment Commission, or by the enforcement of any assessment or by any legal or equitable proceeding by virtue of anyconstitution or statute or otherwise, or under any circumstances, under or independent of the Financing Agreement, shall behad against any member, director, or officer or attorney, as such, past, present, or future, of the City, including withoutlimitation its Economic Development Commission, either directly or through the City, or otherwise, for the payment for orto the City or any receiver thereof or for or to any holder of the Bonds secured thereby, or otherwise, of any sum that mayremain due and unpaid by the City upon any of the Bonds. Any and all personal liability of every nature, whether at commonlaw or in equity, or by statute or by constitution or otherwise, of any such member, director, or officer or attorney, as such, torespond by reason of any act or omission on his or her part or otherwise for, directly or indirectly, the payment for or to theCity or any receiver thereof, or for or to any owner or holder of the Bonds, or otherwise, of any sum that may remain due andunpaid upon the Bonds hereby secured or any at them, shall be expressly waived and released as a condition of andconsideration for the execution and delivery of the Financing Agreement and the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds.

SECTION 8. If any section, paragraph or provision of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable forany reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph or provision shall not affect any of the remainingprovisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 9. All ordinances, resolutions and orders or parts thereof, in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinanceare, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed.

SECTION 10. It is hereby determined that all formal actions of the City-County Council relating to the adoption of thisOrdinance were taken in one or more open meetings of the Council, that all deliberations of the City-County Council and of itscommittees, if any, which resulted in formal action, were in meetings open to the public, and that all such meetings wereconvened, held and conducted in compliance with applicable legal requirements, including Indiana Code 5-14-1.5, as amended.

December 18, 2017

21

SECTION 11. The Mayor, the Controller, the Clerk and any other officer of the City are hereby authorized and directed, in thename and on behalf of the City, to execute, attest and deliver such further instruments and documents, and to take such furtheractions, in the name of the City as in their judgment shall be necessary or advisable in order fully to consummate the transactionsdescribed herein and carry out the purposes of this Ordinance, and any such documents heretofore executed and delivered andany such actions heretofore taken, be, and hereby are, ratified and approved. The Mayor or his designee is hereby authorizedto enter into one or more project agreements with the Developer, on terms and conditions acceptable to the Mayor, togetherwith any changes as may be necessary, desirable or appropriate, which shall be evidenced by his execution thereof.

SECTION 12. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption and compliance with Indiana Code 36-3-4-14.

PROPOSAL NOS. 420-422, 2017. Introduced by Councillor Osili. Proposal Nos. 420-422, 2017are proposals for Rezoning Ordinances certified for approval by the Metropolitan DevelopmentCommission on December 8, 2017. The President called for any motions for public hearings onany of those zoning maps changes. There being no motions for public hearings, the proposedordinances, pursuant to IC 36-7-4-608, took effect as if adopted by the City-County Council, wereretitled for identification as REZONING ORDINANCE NOS. 99-101, 2017, the original copies ofwhich ordinances are on file with the Metropolitan Development Commission, which were certifiedas follows:

REZONING ORDINANCE NO. 99, 2017.2017-CZN-8317900 AND 7916 EAST EDGEWOOD AVENUE (APPROXIMATE ADDRESSES)FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP, CD #25D-5II AND D-5II (PENDING)THESSALONICA, INC., by David A. RetherfordRezoning of 0.38 acre from the D-A District to the D-5II Classification.

REZONING ORDINANCE NO. 100, 2017.2017-CZN-8371306 SOUTH EAST STREET (APPROXIMATE ADDRESS)CENTER TOWNSHIP, CD #16RUS AND REX PROPERTIES, by Bradi Ballard-CurtisRezoning of 0.8 acre from the C-3 district to the D-5 classification.

REZONING ORDINANCE NO. 101, 2017.2017-CZN-8384018 BOWMAN AVENUE, 1227 AND 1233 EAST HANNA AVENUE, 4002 OTTERBEIN AVENUE,1218 AND 1224 WINDERMIRE STREET; 1402, 1406, 1412, 1414, 1420, 1428, 1432, 1502, 1508, 1514AND 1526 EAST CASTLE AVENUE (APPROXIMATE ADDRESSES)PERRY TOWNSHIP, CD #16UNIVERSITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, by Gene Valanzano, India Olson, and J. Murray ClarkRezoning of 4.7 acres from the D-4 and SU-1 districts to the UQ-1 classification.

PROPOSAL NO. 423, 2017. Introduced by Councillor Osili. Proposal No. 423, 2017 is a proposalfor Rezoning Ordinance certified by the Metropolitan Development Commission for denial onDecember 8, 2017. The President called for any motions for public hearings on this zoning mapschange. There being no motions for public hearings, the proposed ordinance, pursuant to IC 36-7-4-608, was denied by the City-County Council, the original copy of which ordinance is on file withthe Metropolitan Development Commission, which was certified as follows:

2017-CZN-8265555 SOUTHEASTERN AVENUE; 2161 SOUTH RITTER AVENUE (APPROXIMATE ADDRESS)C-3/D-3WARREN TOWNSHIP, CD #18CASEY’S MARKETING COMPANY, by Joseph D. CalderonRezoning of 0.99 acre from the C-3 and D-3 districts to the C-4 classification.


22

SPECIAL ORDERS - PUBLIC HEARING

PROPOSAL NO. 357, 2017 . Councillor Osili reported that the Metropolitan and EconomicDevelopment Committee heard Proposal No. 357, 2017 on December 11, 2017. The proposal,sponsored by Councillor Adamson, approves the 2018 Budget of the Woodruff Place EconomicImprovement District. By a 7-0 vote, the Committee reported the proposal to the Council with therecommendation that it do pass.

The President called for public testimony at 7:51 p.m. There being no one present to testify,Councillor Osili moved, seconded by Councillor Adamson, for adoption. Proposal No. 357, 2017was adopted on the following roll call vote; viz:


Proposal No. 357, 2017 was retitled FISCAL ORDINANCE NO. 49, 2017, and reads as follows:

CITY-COUNTY FISCAL ORDINANCE NO. 49, 2017

PROPOSAL FOR A FISCAL ORDINANCE approving the 2018 Budget of the Woodruff Place Economic ImprovementDistrict.

WHEREAS, General Ordinance No. 67, 2016 (Proposal No. 249, 2015) established the Woodruff Place EconomicImprovement District (EID); and

WHEREAS, Section 121-603 of the “Revised Code of the Consolidated City and County” provides that the EID Boardis to be appointed by the Council, and the Board is to prepare and submit a proposed budget governing the Board’s projectedexpenditures from the Woodruff Place Economic Improvement Fund; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to IC 36-7-22-17(a) and Section 121-603(b) of the Revised Code, the Council may approve,modify, or reject the EID Board’s proposed budget; and

WHEREAS, the EID Board has now prepared and submitted a proposed budget for calendar year 2018 to the Council;now, therefore:


SECTION 1. Pursuant to IC 36-7-22-17(a) and Section 121-603(b) of the “Revised Code of the Consolidated City andCounty,” the Woodruff Place Economic Improvement Board has submitted its proposed budget for calendar year 2018. Theproposed budget is attached hereto and made a part hereof, marked as Exhibit A. The total proposed budget is Forty-fiveThousand Dollars ($45,000).

SECTION 2. The Council hereby approves the proposed budget submitted by the Woodruff Place Economic ImprovementBoard for calendar year 2018.

SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption and compliance with IC 36-3-4-14.

SPECIAL ORDERS - FINAL ADOPTION

Councillor Osili reported that the Metropolitan and Economic Development Committee heardProposal Nos. 297, 344, and 358-362, 2017 on December 11, 2017.

PROPOSAL NO. 297, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Osili, amends the Code toestablish by ordinance the manner and form in which the county recorder may provide bulk form

December 18, 2017

23

copies to bulk users. By a 7-0 vote, the Committee reported the proposal to the Council with therecommendation that it do pass.

Councillor Adamson asked if he is right in his understanding that a portion of these fees will begoing toward homelessness intervention. Bart Brown, Council Chief Financial Officer (CFO),stated that there was a proposal passed earlier this year for the Recorder due to a change in Statelaw that allowed for some fees to go into the Housing Trust Fund. Some of those fees can gotoward homelessness intervention.

Councillor Osili moved, seconded by Councillor Adamson, for adoption. Proposal No. 297, 2017was adopted on the following roll call vote; viz:


Proposal No. 297, 2017 was retitled GENERAL ORDINANCE NO. 74, 2017, and reads as follows:

CITY-COUNTY GENERAL ORDINANCE NO. 74, 2017

PROPOSAL FOR A GENERAL ORDINANCE to amend the Revised Code to establish by ordinance the manner andform in which the county recorder may provide bulk form copies to bulk users.

WHEREAS, the Marion County Recorder provides bulk form copies to bulk users;

WHEREAS, bulk users receive bulk copies at a cost lower than non-bulk users; and

WHEREAS, the 2017 General Assembly passed Senate Enrolled Act 505 which requires that each county enact anordinance establishing the manner in which bulk form copies are provided to bulk form users.


SECTION 1. Chapter 281, of the “Revised Code of the Consolidated City and County,” hereby is amended to add a newarticle and that article shall read as follows:

ARTICLE VII – OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER

Sec. 281-701. Bulk Form Copies

(a) Pursuant to Indiana Code section 36-2-7-10.1, the Marion County Recorder may provide bulk form copies toa bulk user:

(1) on a disk, tape, drum, or any other medium of electronic data storage or microfilm;(2) by electronically transmitting the copies using an electronic transfer process; or(3) under both subdivisions (1) and (2).

SECTION 2. Should any provision (section, paragraph, sentence, clause, or any other portion) of this ordinance be declaredby a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid for any reason, the remaining provision or provisions shall not be affected,if and only if such remaining provisions can, without the invalid provisions or provisions, be given the effect intended by theCouncil in adopting this ordinance. To this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable.

SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after its passage by the Council and compliance with Indiana Code §36-3-4-14.

PROPOSAL NO. 344, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Osili,approves the issuanceof special taxing district bonds of the Redevelopment District in an amount not to exceed


24

$14,000,000 for the purpose of refunding an Installment Purchase Contract between theDepartment of Metropolitan Development and Market Square Garage/Ops Partners, LLC for theparking garage commonly known as the Bank One Garage, and approves transaction costs relatedthereto. By a 7-0 vote, the Committee reported the proposal to the Council with therecommendation that it do pass.

Thomas Cook, Mayor’s Chief of Staff, gave a brief synopsis of the original financing arrangementfrom 2011. He said that the new administration decided to re-finance this to avoid a lump sumpayment they were not able to make. The Metropolitan Development Commission (MDC)approved using other funds to pledge toward repayment of this refunding, and they were able tosave some agencies money by no longer having to pay for their employees to park in that garage.He said that there were a lot of good ideas brought up in committee about the use of these newfreed-up operating funds.

Councillor Adamson said that he voted for this proposal in committee, but wants to register hisofficial concerns that he believes this deal was entered into illegally, because it was not enteredinto by the Council, as the fiscal body. He said, however, that he still believes it is the right thingto do.

Councillor Simpson asked how this arrangement works out. Sarah Riordan, executive director ofthe Indianapolis Bond Bank, said that a bill on this transaction is due January 16th for $19 million,which they do not have. She said that they have explored various ways to pay off that debt. Thereis $3 million cash on hand, and they have identified revenues from the garage and TIF revenues topay back that debt on a new schedule. She said that this proposal also is asking for the Council toapprove a special benefits tax, but that is really just for credit enhancement and they do not feelthat tax would ever need to be triggered. She said that this gives the loan a longer term with nominimum prepayment penalties, and they are determined to pay it off before it is officially due in2033.

Councillor Gray asked if the same organization that approved this transaction under a previousadministration still exists. Ms. Riordan said that the Circle Area Community DevelopmentCorporation (CAC) does still exist, but this would change their involvement so that they are nolonger party to the existing note, and the City and the bank would be the only ones involved goingforward. Councillor Gray asked if CAC still exists an is still making these kinds of deals. Ms.Riordan said that they still exist, but are not making deals. All they have done for the last 18 monthsis to assess outstanding liabilities, under the direction of the current administration. CouncillorGray asked who the CAC answers to. Ms. Riordan said that there is a five-member board thatdirects the CAC, and all appointees to that board are appointed by the Mayor. Councillor Grayasked if they are not, then, subject to the Council’s oversight. Ms. Riordan said that this is correct,as they are a private board, but they are now under a full financial audit and on the books with theState and Federal government as they should be.

Councillor Adamson asked if the CAC earns revenues from the properties they own. Ms. Riordansaid that the CAC does not own this garage, but does own one on Illinois Street, where the restaurantBuca di Beppo is located. She said that the revenues from that garage are used to pay off the debton that structure. She said that they no longer have a hand in this garage. She said that the BondBank would be more than happy to come back before one or more of the Council’s committees fora full report regarding CAC’s holdings and liabilities and answer questions as they move forward.Councillor Adamson said that he would be very interested in such a report. He said that he doesnot remember a special tax being mentioned in committee. Ms. Riordan said that this is simplyused as a credit enhancement, pledged in the event that revenues from the garage and TIF are not

December 18, 2017

25

sufficient to pay back that debt. The City would be in a position to invoke that tax, but there is noanticipation that they would ever need to trigger such, and this proposal in no way obligates theCity to initiate that tax.

Councillor Mascari asked if the developer was loaned $13 million to develop this garage. Ms.Riordan said that it is her understanding that the City purchased the garage from the previous ownerthrough an installment purchase contract, financed by a note from the bank, with the City payingthe interest on that note. A large payment on that note is due in January. Councillor Mascari askedif the developer is paying anything on that now. Ms. Riordan said that they do pay for some spacesin the garage, which go toward paying down that debt. Councillor Mascari asked if they receivedan abatement. Ms. Riordan said that they provided a payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT), and therepayment of that went toward debt service on the garage.

Mr. Brown said that this was once called the Bank One Garage, and was used as parking for BankOne employees. The garage already existed, and none of this money went toward development oractual building of a garage.

Councillor Jackson asked if there is another alternative to this recommendation. Mr. Cook saidthat they are not actually voting on the refinancing, but voting on giving the administration theability to do the refinancing. He said that they changed aspects of the proposal through workingwith the committee chair and due to feedback from CFO Brown and other members of the Council.He said that the detail they have presented is not in the actual proposal and is simply a request tomove forward with the refinancing. He said that the MDC’s approval gives them a lot of flexibility,but they have tried to narrow it down and are not asking for a blank check, but are asking theCouncil to affirm their ability to enter into an agreement. He said that great conversation took placein committee, and he knows that the questions concerning this deal are bigger than this refinancingbecause of what happened prior to this administration taking over. He said that they are happy tocome back and give a briefing regarding the financing and history of the CAC. Councillor Jacksonsaid that she believes it is very important for them to come back to committee with moreinformation regarding the CAC. She asked if they are able as a City to collect from any other thirdpary before going this route. Mr. Cook said that they are only looking at the revenues available tothem, both with regard to TIF revenue and the payments City and County agencies are making topark in this garage. He said that they have chosen to present this type of deal structure so thatagencies will not have to continue to pay, but the majority of funding is coming from private dollars,and public dollars will only be used to the extent that they are necessary.

Mr. Brown said that there was conversation about using revenues from the garage, and they decidedit was not advisable to take money from the fund balances, because it would make them fall belowtheir commitments. There is a $3 million balance in the garage revenue, so they have some cashto put toward this payment. He said that he believes this is the best alternative other than default,and it will also free up some dollars for some agencies to be used for things other than parking.

Councillor Simpson said, as the chair of the Administration and Finance Committee, he would liketo definitely schedule a presentation regarding the CAC. It is his understanding they just got theaudit back, and he believes a report is warranted, as several Councillors have some deep concernsabout this. He said that at this point, it does not seem they have much choice and have to dosomething and take some action to rectify this.



26


Proposal No. 344, 2017 was retitled GENERAL RESOLUTION NO. 28, 2017, and reads asfollows:

CITY-COUNTY GENERAL RESOLUTION NO. 28, 2017

A GENERAL RESOLUTION approving the issuance of special taxing district bonds of the Redevelopment District ofthe City of Indianapolis, Indiana (the “Redevelopment District”), to be issued in one or more series or issues, for thepurpose of refunding certain prior obligations of the Redevelopment District and to pay costs of issuance in connectiontherewith and approving and authorizing other actions with respect thereto.

WHEREAS, the City of Indianapolis Department of Metropolitan Development (the “DMD”), on behalf of theMetropolitan Development Commission of Marion County, Indiana, acting as the Redevelopment Commission of theCity of Indianapolis, Indiana (the “Commission”), being the governing body of the Redevelopment District, haspreviously entered into that certain Installment Purchase Contract (Garage Site), dated May 19, 2011 (the “InstallmentPurchase Contract”), between DMD and Market Square Garage/Ops Partners, LLC (the “Developer”), for the purpose offinancing the purchase, on an installment basis, by the Redevelopment District from the Developer of the parking garagecommonly known as the Bank One Garage and paying transaction costs related thereto; and

WHEREAS, the installment payments due under the Installment Purchase Contract are payable by the Commissionfrom certain revenues derived from the operation of the Bank One Garage site, together with the net revenues from oneor more other parking garages to the extent that the revenues derived from the operation of the Bank One Garage site arenot sufficient for such purpose; and

WHEREAS, the Commission now desires to issue bonds of the Redevelopment District to prepay the outstandingbalance of the purchase price owed by the Commission under the terms of the Installment Purchase Contract in order torealize a substantial savings, pay amounts about to become due and for which sufficient funds are not available, or tomodify restrictive covenants, all in accordance with Indiana Code 5-1-5, as amended; and

WHEREAS, the Commission has adopted, or is expected to adopt, a bond resolution (the “Bond Resolution”)authorizing the issuance of special taxing district bonds of the Redevelopment District, in one or more series, in anaggregate principal amount not to exceed $14,000,000 (the “Bonds”) for the purpose of providing funds, together withother legally available revenues of the Redevelopment District, to (i) prepay the outstanding balance of the purchase priceowed by the Commission under the Installment Purchase Contract in accordance with the terms thereof, and (ii) pay allexpenses incurred in connection with or on account of the issuance of the Bonds, including funding a reserve for theBonds, if necessary; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Bond Resolution, the Bonds will be payable solely from a special tax to be levied andcollected upon all taxable property in the Redevelopment District, pursuant to Indiana Code § 36-7-15.1-19 (the “SpecialTax”), to the extent other legally available revenues of the Redevelopment District are not sufficient for such purpose;and

WHEREAS, Indiana Code 36-3-5-8 requires the City-County Council of the City of Indianapolis and of MarionCounty, Indiana (the “Council”) to approve by resolution the issuance of bonds by any special taxing district of the City,including the Redevelopment District; and

WHEREAS, the Commission has requested the review and approval of the Council for the issuance of the Bondspursuant to Indiana Code 36-3-5-8, and the Council now finds that the issuance of the Bonds should be approved; now,therefore:


SECTION 1. The Council does hereby approve (i) the Bond Resolution; (ii) the issuance of the Bonds of theRedevelopment District, in one or more series, with a final maturity not later than January 15, 2038, and in an originalaggregate principal amount not to exceed $14,000,000, payable from a Special Tax to be levied upon all of the taxableproperty in the Redevelopment District, as provided by Indiana Code 36-7-15.1-19, to the extent other legally available

December 18, 2017

27

revenues of the Redevelopment District are not sufficient for such purpose, and (iii) the use of the proceeds of the Bondsto prepay the balance of the purchase price owed under the terms of the Installment Purchase Contract and payment ofcosts of issuance of the Bonds, including funding a reserve for the Bonds, if necessary.

SECTION 2. This resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption and compliance with Indiana Code 36-3-4-14, 36-3-4-15 and 36-3-4-16.

PROPOSAL NO. 358, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Adamson, approves theamounts, locations and programmatic operation of certain projects to be funded from CommunityDevelopment Grant Funds. By a 7-0 vote, the Committee reported the proposal to the Council withthe recommendation that it do pass. Councillor Osili moved, seconded by Councillor Adamson,for adoption. Proposal No. 358, 2017 was adopted on the following roll call vote; viz:


Proposal No. 358, 2017 was retitled SPECIAL RESOLUTION NO. 45, 2017, and reads as follows:

CITY-COUNTY SPECIAL RESOLUTION NO. 45, 2017

PROPOSAL FOR A SPECIAL RESOLUTION approving the amounts, locations, and programmatic operation of certainprojects to be funded from Community Development Grant Funds.

WHEREAS, the City-County Council, the Consolidated City of Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana (“Council”),passed City-County Fiscal Ordinance No. 26, 2017, the 2018 Annual Budget of the Consolidated City of Indianapolisand for Marion County, Indiana (“Budget Ordinance”); and

WHEREAS, Section 4.01 (b) of the Budget Ordinance, as approved by the Council reads as follows:

Community Development Grant Funds. Until this Council has approved the amounts, locations, andprogrammatic operation of each project to be funded from Community Development Grant Funds, the amountsappropriated herein for such purposes shall not be encumbered or spent.

WHEREAS, the Department of Metropolitan Development of the City of Indianapolis, Indiana (“Department ofMetropolitan Development”) has presented the 2018 Consolidated Annual Action Plan, a document submitted to theUnited States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), which sets forth the City’s goals and intentionsfor using federal dollars in fiscal year 2018 to the Council; and

WHEREAS, the 2018 Consolidated Annual Action Plan identifies the amounts, locations, and programmaticoperation of each project that will be funded by the Community Development Grant Funds, which are summarized in theSummary of 2018 Proposed Activities, attached hereto as Attachment A and incorporated herein by reference; and

WHEREAS, Council now finds that the amounts, locations, and programmatic operations of each project listed inthe 2018 Consolidated Annual Action Plan, including insubstantial amendments thereto should be approved; now,therefore:


SECTION 1. That the amounts, locations, and programmatic operations of each of the projects included in the 2018Consolidated Annual Action Plan, which are summarized in the Summary of 2018 Proposed Activities, attached heretoas Attachment A and incorporated herein by reference, are approved.

SECTION 2. This approval shall constitute the approval required under Section 4.01 (b) of the Budget Ordinance andshall include and allow insubstantial amendments to the approved projects.

SECTION 3. This resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption and compliance with Indiana Code section

36-3-4-14.


28

PROPOSAL NO. 359, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Lewis, approves totalexpenditures of $1,282,750 for calendar year 2018 from Community Revitalization EnhancementDistrict (CRED) Funds for various improvements benefitting the Lafayette Square CRED (akaInternational Marketplace). By a 7-0 vote, the Committee reported the proposal to the Council withthe recommendation that it do pass. Councillor Osili moved, seconded by Councillor Adamson,for adoption. Proposal No. 359, 2017 was adopted on the following roll call vote; viz:

24 YEAS: Adamson, Clay, Coats, Cordi, Evans, Fanning, Gray, Holliday, Jackson, Johnson,Kreider, Lewis, Mascari, McHenry, Miller, Mowery, Oliver, Osili, Pfisterer, Ray, Robinson,Scales, Simpson, Wesseler0 NAYS:1 NOT VOTING: McQuillen



PROPOSAL FOR A GENERAL RESOLUTION to approve expenditures from the Community RevitalizationEnhancement District’s Industrial Development Fund, established pursuant to IC 36-7-13-4, for use within the LafayetteSquare Community Revitalization Enhancement District (CRED) a/k/a International Marketplace.

WHEREAS, a Community Revitalization Enhancement District (hereinafter referred to as “CRED”) was created,pursuant to IC 36-7-13, et seq, (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) in a section of the City of Indianapolis (“City)commonly and alternatively known as Lafayette Square and/or the International Marketplace; and

WHEREAS, in accordance with the Act, a CRED Industrial Development Fund (hereinafter referred to as the“CRED Fund”) was established which annually receives a portion of: (a) state and local income taxes paid by employeesin the CRED; and (b) state retail and use taxes generated by businesses within the CRED; and

WHEREAS, an Advisory Commission on Industrial Development (hereinafter referred to as the “CREDCommission”) has been appointed by the City’s Mayor, pursuant to Section 5 of the Act, to coordinate the efforts of theCity and the private sector with regard to redevelopment of the CRED; and

WHEREAS, the City previously commissioned studies and drafted plans that identified impediments toredevelopment and indicated that catalytic projects were needed to attract visitors and customers from around the regionto support the small business within the CRED District and attract new businesses to the area; and

WHEREAS, to address obstacles identified and goals formulated in the study, the Act allows CRED funds to beused, among other purposes, to fund Site Improvements, Buildings, Structures, Rehabilitation, and Administration andOperating Expenses; and

WHEREAS, the CRED Commission has determined that expenditures of $1,282,750.00 during calendar year 2018that will meet those needs; and

WHEREAS, the City-County Council of Indianapolis and Marion County, Indiana (hereinafter referred to as"Council") is empowered by the Act to make certain expenditures from the CRED Fund as long as a majority of themembers of the CRED Commission have provided the Council with written approval of such expenditures; and

WHEREAS, on November 2, 2017, a majority of the members of the CRED Commission adopted and approvedcertain expenditures from the CRED Fund, totaling $1,282,750.00, for activities authorized by the Act, as reflected inthe CRED Commission Resolution; now therefore


December 18, 2017

29

SECTION 1. The Council hereby approves expenditures from the CRED Fund in the total amount of $1,282,750.00 forthe expenditures in calendar year 2018 that are described in more detail in the attached Budget for these CREDredevelopment activities authorized by the Act, as specified in the CRED Commission Resolution.

SECTION 2. The Council hereby authorizes the City’s Department of Metropolitan Development and its Director to takesuch further actions and execute such documents as deemed necessary or advisable to effectuate the expenditure approval setforth in SECTION 1 of this Resolution in furtherance of redevelopment of the CRED.


PROPOSAL NO. 360, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Holliday, approves thestatement of benefits for CraftMark Bakery LLC, an applicant for tax abatement for propertylocated in an Economic Revitalization Area. By a 7-0 vote, the Committee reported the proposalto the Council with the recommendation that it do pass. Councillor Osili moved, seconded byCouncillor Adamson, for adoption. Proposal No. 360, 2017 was adopted on the following roll callvote; viz:

24 YEAS: Adamson, Clay, Coats, Cordi, Evans, Fanning, Gray, Holliday, Jackson, Johnson,Kreider, Lewis, Mascari, McHenry, Miller, Mowery, Oliver, Osili, Pfisterer, Ray, Robinson,Scales, Simpson, Wesseler0 NAYS:1 NOT VOTING: McQuillen



PROPOSAL FOR A GENERAL RESOLUTION to approve the statements of benefits of CraftMark Bakery, LLC andGPT Exploration Drive Owner, LLC (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Applicant”), an applicant for tax abatementfor property located in an allocation area as defined by IC 36-7-15.1-26.

WHEREAS, IC 6-1.1-12.1 allows a partial abatement of property taxes attributable to redevelopment, rehabilitationactivities or installation of new equipment in Economic Revitalization Areas (each hereinafter referred to as a “Project”);and

WHEREAS, pursuant to IC 6-1.1-12.1, the Metropolitan Development Commission of Marion County, Indiana,acting as the Redevelopment Commission of the City of Indianapolis, Indiana (hereinafter referred to as "MDC") isempowered to designate Economic Revitalization Areas; and

WHEREAS, IC 6-1.1-12.1 requires an applicant for Economic Revitalization Area designation to provide astatement of benefits and requires the MDC, before it makes a decision to designate the area as an EconomicRevitalization Area, to determine that (i) the estimated value of a Project is reasonable for projects of that nature, (ii) theestimated employment at the indicated annual salaries for a Project identified in the statement of benefits can reasonablybe expected, (iii) a Project can be reasonably expected to yield the benefits identified in the statement of benefits and (iv)the totality of benefits arising from a Project is sufficient to justify Economic Revitalization Area designation; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to IC 6-1.1-12.1-2(k), a statement of benefits for property located within an allocation area, asdefined by IC 36-7-15.1-26, may not be approved unless the City-County Council of Indianapolis and Marion County,Indiana (hereinafter referred to as "Council") adopts a resolution approving the statement of benefits; and

WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted real and personal property Statements of Benefits to the MDC as part ofits application for Economic Revitalization Area designation for property where Applicant’s Project will occur, locatedwithin an allocation area, as defined by IC 36-7-15.1-26; and

WHEREAS, MDC has preliminarily approved Applicant’s Statements of Benefits, pending adoption from theCouncil, to allow the designation of the Economic Revitalization Area and related tax abatement pursuant to IC 6-1.1-12.1; now, therefore:


30


SECTION 1. The Council hereby approves the Statements of Benefits that were submitted to the MDC, as part of theapplication for Economic Revitalization Area designation, by CraftMark Bakery, LLC and GPT Exploration DriveOwner, LLC.

SECTION 2. This resolution shall be in effect from and after its passage by the Council and compliance with Ind. Code 36-3-4-14.

PROPOSAL NO. 361, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Evans, approves the statementof benefits for Federal Express Corporation, an applicant for tax abatement for property located inan Economic Revitalization Area. By a 6-0-1 vote, the Committee reported the proposal to theCouncil with the recommendation that it do pass.

Councillor Pfisterer said that she spoke with a gentleman from Fed Ex, who said that they arelooking for 300 employees immediately at these hiring rates, so anyone interested should contactthem immediately. Councillor Osili added that there are no restrictions regarding criminalbackgrounds and Fed Ex is a re-entry employer.





PROPOSAL FOR A GENERAL RESOLUTION to approve the statements of benefits of Federal Express Corporation(hereinafter referred to as “Applicant”), an applicant for tax abatement for property located in an allocation area as definedby IC 36-7-15.1-26.





December 18, 2017

31

WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted a personal property Statement of Benefits to the MDC as part of itsapplication for Economic Revitalization Area designation for property where Applicant’s Project will occur, locatedwithin an allocation area, as defined by IC 36-7-15.1-26; and

WHEREAS, MDC has preliminarily approved Applicant’s Statement of Benefits, pending adoption from theCouncil, to allow the designation of the Economic Revitalization Area and related tax abatement pursuant to IC 6-1.1-12.1; now, therefore:


SECTION 1. The Council hereby approves the Statements of Benefits that were submitted to the MDC, as part of theapplication for Economic Revitalization Area designation, by Federal Express Corporation.

SECTION 2. This resolution shall be in effect from and after its passage by the Council and compliancewith Ind. Code 36-3-4-14.

PROPOSAL NO. 362, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Osili, approves the statementof benefits for LifeOmic, Inc., an applicant for tax abatement for property located in an EconomicRevitalization Area. By a 6-0 vote, the Committee reported the proposal to the Council with therecommendation that it do pass. Councillor Osili moved, seconded by Councillor Adamson, foradoption. Proposal No. 362, 2017 was adopted on the following roll call vote; viz:

23 YEAS: Adamson, Clay, Coats, Cordi, Evans, Fanning, Gray, Holliday, Jackson, Johnson,Kreider, Lewis, Mascari, McHenry, McQuillen, Miller, Oliver, Osili, Pfisterer, Ray, Robinson,Simpson, Wesseler0 NAYS:2 NOT VOTING: Mowery, Scales



PROPOSAL FOR A GENERAL RESOLUTION to approve the statements of benefits of LifeOmic, Inc. (hereinafterreferred to as “Applicant”), an applicant for tax abatement for property located in an allocation area as defined by IC 36-7-15.1-26.






32

WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted a personal property Statement of Benefits to the MDC as part of itsapplication for Economic Revitalization Area designation for property where Applicant’s Project will occur, locatedwithin an allocation area, as defined by IC 36-7-15.1-26; and

WHEREAS, MDC has preliminarily approved Applicant’s Statement of Benefits, pending adoption from theCouncil, to allow the designation of the Economic Revitalization Area and related tax abatement pursuant to IC 6-1.1-12.1; now, therefore:


SECTION 1. The Council hereby approves the Statements of Benefits that were submitted to the MDC, as part of theapplication for Economic Revitalization Area designation, by LifeOmic, Inc.

SECTION 2. This resolution shall be in effect from and after its passage by the Council and compliance with Ind. Code 36-3-4-14.

PROPOSAL NO. 365, 2017. Councillor Gray reported that the Municipal Corporations Committeeheard Proposal No. 365, 2017 on December 13, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Gray,approves the issuance of refunding notes in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $3,200,000for the Capital Improvement Board of Managers of Marion County. By a 7-0 vote, the Committeereported the proposal to the Council with the recommendation that it do pass. Councillor Graymoved, seconded by Councillor Coats, for adoption. Proposal No. 365, 2017 was adopted on thefollowing roll call vote; viz:




A GENERAL RESOLUTION approving the issuance of refunding notes and other matters connected therewith relatedto the Capital Improvement Board of Managers of Marion County.

WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Board of Managers of Marion County ("CIB") desires to extend the currentDecember 31, 2017 maturity date of a portion of its outstanding junior subordinate notes (“Outstanding Notes”) by notmore than 5 years and in the principal amount not to exceed $3,200,000; and

WHEREAS, the City-County Council of Indianapolis and Marion County (the "Council") is authorized by IC 36-3-6-9(c) to approve the issuance of notes of the CIB; now, therefore:


SECTION 1. The Council hereby approves the issuance of refunding notes of CIB by the Board in the principal amountnot to exceed $3,200,000 to be applied to refinance Outstanding Notes by extending the maturity date thereof by notmore than 5 years.


Councillor Adamson reported that the Public Works Committee heard Proposal Nos. 385-394, 2017on December 14, 2017. He asked for consent to vote on these proposals together. Consent wasgiven.

December 18, 2017

33

PROPOSAL NO. 385, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Adamson, approvesintersection controls at Oakland and Nowland Avenue (District 17). PROPOSAL NO. 386, 2017.The proposal, sponsored by Councillors Oliver, Osili and Adamson, authorizes a change in parkingrestrictions on Central Avenue from 34th Street to 11th Street (Districts 9, 11, 17). PROPOSALNO. 387, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Osili, authorizes parking restrictions on24th Street between Illinois and Meridian Streets (District 11). PROPOSAL NO. 388, 2017. Theproposal, sponsored by Councillor Oliver, authorizes intersection controls at Linton Lane andThornleigh Drive (District 9). PROPOSAL NO. 389, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by CouncillorOsili, authorizes parking restrictions on Park Avenue near East 23rd Street (District 11).PROPOSAL NO. 390, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Cordi, authorizes a speedlimit reduction to 25 miles per hour in the Treyburn Green, Treyburn Lakes and Treyburn Manorsubdivisions (District 18). PROPOSAL NO. 391, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by CouncillorRay, authorizes a speed limit reduction to 25 miles per hour in the Washington Trail subdivision(District 19). PROPOSAL NO. 392, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Robinson,authorizes intersection controls at Waldemar Road and 94th Street (District 1). PROPOSAL NO.393, 2017. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Osili, authorizes intersection controls at GentAvenue and 19th Street (District 11). PROPOSAL NO. 394, 2017. The proposal, sponsored byCouncillor Mascari, authorizes intersection controls at Boyd Avenue and Finley Avenue (District21). By an 8-0 vote, the Committee reported the proposals to the Council with the recommendationthat they do pass. Councillor Adamson moved, seconded by Councillor McQuillen, for adoption.Proposal Nos. 385-394, 2017 were adopted on the following roll call vote; viz:




PROPOSAL FOR A GENERAL ORDINANCE to amend the Revised Code to make various changes to Chapter 441, Traffic.


SECTION 1. That the Revised Code of the Consolidated City and County, Indianapolis/Marion County, Indiana,specifically Sec. 441-416, Schedule of intersection controls, be, and the same is hereby amended by the deletion of thefollowing, to wit:

Base Map Intersection Preferential Type of Control

26 Oakland AvenueNowland Avenue

Nowland Avenue Stop

SECTION 2. That the Revised Code of the Consolidated City and County, Indianapolis/Marion County, Indiana,specifically Sec. 441-416, Schedule of intersection controls, be, and the same is hereby amended by the addition of thefollowing, to wit:


26 Oakland AvenueNowland Avenue

None All-Way

SECTION 3. The expressed or implied repeal or amendment by this ordinance of any other ordinance or part of any otherordinance does not affect any rights or liabilities accrued, penalties incurred, or proceedings begun prior to the effective date


34

of this ordinance. Those rights, liabilities, and proceedings are continued, and penalties shall be imposed and enforced underthe repealed or amended ordinance as if this ordinance had not been adopted.

SECTION 4. Should any provision (section, paragraph, sentence, clause, or any other portion) of this ordinance be declaredby a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid for any reason, the remaining provision or provisions shall not be affected,if and only if such remaining provisions can, without the invalid provision or provisions, be given the effect intended by theCouncil in adopting this ordinance. To this end the provisions of this ordinance are severable.

SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be in effect from and after its passage by the Council and compliance with Ind. Code § 36-3-4-14.



PROPOSAL FOR A GENERAL ORDINANCE to amend the Revised Code to make various changes to Chapter 621, Parking,standing, and stopping restricted.


SECTION 1. That the Revised Code of the Consolidated City and County, Indianapolis/Marion County, Indiana,specifically Sec. 621-125, Stopping, standing, and parking prohibited at designated locations on certain days and hours,be, and the same is hereby amended by the deletion of the following, to wit:

Central Avenue, on the west side, from Thirty-Fourth Street to Eleventh Street, west leg;

SECTION 2. The expressed or implied repeal or amendment by this ordinance of any other ordinance or part of any otherordinance does not affect any rights or liabilities accrued, penalties incurred, or proceedings begun prior to the effective dateof this ordinance. Those rights, liabilities, and proceedings are continued, and penalties shall be imposed and enforced underthe repealed or amended ordinance as if this ordinance had not been adopted.







SECTION 1. That the Revised Code of the Consolidated City and County, Indianapolis/Marion County, Indiana,specifically Sec. 621-121(b), Parking prohibited at all times on certain street, be, and the same is hereby amended by theaddition of the following, to wit:

Twenty-Fourth Street, both sides, from Illinois Street to Meridian Street;


December 18, 2017

35









19 Linton LaneThornleigh Drive

Thornleigh Drive Stop



19 Linton LaneThornleigh Drive

None All-Way








SECTION 1. That the Revised Code of the Consolidated City and County, Indianapolis/Marion County, Indiana,specifically Sec. 621-121(b), Parking prohibited at all times on certain street, be, and the same is hereby amended by theaddition of the following, to wit:


36

Park Avenue, on west side, from one-hundred feet south of Twenty-Third Street to one-hundred and seventy-five feetsouth of Twenty-Third Street;








SECTION 1. That the Revised Code of the Consolidated City and County, Indianapolis/Marion County, Indiana,specifically Sec. 441-323, Alteration of prima facie speed limits, be, and the same is hereby amended by the addition ofthe following, to wit:

All Streets within the Treyburn Green, Treyburn Lakes, and Treyburn Manor platted subdivisions, 25 mph;








SECTION 1. That the Revised Code of the Consolidated City and County, Indianapolis/Marion County, Indiana,specifically Sec. 441-323, Alteration of prima facie speed limits, be, and the same is hereby amended by the addition ofthe following, to wit:

All streets and sections within the Washington Trail platted subdivision, 25 mph;

December 18, 2017

37







BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND OF MARION COUNTY, INDIANA



2 Waldemar RoadNinety-Fourth Street

Ninety-Fourth Street Stop










24 Gent AvenueNineteenth Street

Gent Avenue Stop


38



24 Gent AvenueNineteenth Street

None All-Way










32 Boyd AvenueFinley Avenue

Finley Avenue Stop



32 Boyd AvenueFinley Avenue

None All-Way



December 18, 2017

39


NEW BUSINESS

Councillor Pfisterer wished all her fellow Councillors, City and County employees, and the citizensof Indianapolis a very Merry Christmas; and thanked them for all they do all year long to make thisa better City.

ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADJOURNMENT

The President said that the docketed agenda for this meeting of the Council having been completed,the Chair would entertain motions for adjournment.

Councillor McQuillen stated that he had been asked to offer the following motion for adjournmentby:

(1) All Councillors in memory of Jening Scott Stone, Jr.; and(2) Councillor Pfisterer in memory of Martin Yohler; and(3) Councillor Evans in memory of James O. Smith and Arthur L. Stout; and(4) Councillor McQuillen in memory of Barbara A. Gilyeat, Christopher Everett Recktenwall,

Rose Anne Davidson and Frances G. MacAllister.

Councillor McQuillen moved the adjournment of this meeting of the Indianapolis City-CountyCouncil in recognition of and respect for the life and contributions of Jening Scott Stone, Jr., MartinYohler, James O. Smith, Arthur L. Stout, Barbara A. Gilyeat, Christopher Everett Recktenwall,Rose Anne Davidson and Frances G. MacAllister. He respectfully asked the support of fellowCouncillors. He further requested that the motion be made a part of the permanent records of thisbody and that a letter bearing the Council seal and the signature of the President be sent to the familiesadvising of this action.

There being no further business, and upon motion duly made and seconded, the meeting adjourned at8:35 p.m.

We hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and complete record of the proceedingsof the regular concurrent meetings of the City-Council of Indianapolis-Marion County, Indiana, andIndianapolis Police, Fire and Solid Waste Collection Special Service District Councils on the 18thday of December, 2017.

In Witness Whereof, we have hereunto subscribed our signatures and caused the Seal of the City ofIndianapolis to be affixed.

President

ATTEST:

Clerk of the Council(SEAL)