analyzed operations of groundwork buffalo to identify non-value add activities and propose...
TRANSCRIPT
Six Sigma
Quality
Presentation
Aashutosh Hawaldar
Aditya Thakur
Betsy Abraham
Darshan Patwardhan
Gautam Batra
Palaque Thakur
Shaliesh Darekar
Sherwin Fernandes
What is Groundwork-Buffalo?
Not-for-profit organization
Located in downtown buffalo
Works towards developing vacant city-owned land areasin buffalo into gardens and other options serving“environmental justice”
Funded by grant providers for projects
Work with other similar organizations working in this field
Approval of city government required
Involvement of the local communities
Define
Problem statement : Standardize the existing process and make possible improvements
Project Scope: Measurable aspects of the existing process that help increasing the per annum success rate
Goal Statement: To improve the existing process and enhance the effectiveness of organization
Increase the rate of successful projects undertaken per year
Contacts: Mr. Tim Fulton - Executive Director
Mr. Andre McKnight – Program Manager
Define: Project Charter
• Outline Project objectives and scope
• Delineate roles and responsibilities
Issues Observed at Ground works
Community Participation limited
Slow Communication Between Stake-holders
Slow Project Handling Rate
Volunteering issue
Lack of funding for projects
Lack of funding for operations
Low approval rate from city government
Each stage takes 1.5-2 months
Total time taken for a decision
cycle 6-8months
Projects handled in a year = 4
Successful projects a year = 1 or
2
Measure: Process
Flow
Measure: Swim Lane Diagram
Lead time added instead of eliminated
Slow individual decision making
1.5-2 months of NVA time between 30-60mins of VA time at each
stage
Measure: Time Series PlotNo of Projects Handled per year & No of successful
projects per year – Current
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Handling
Success
Improve: Flowchart
Large no of projects handled
simultaneously
NVA time in the decision cycle
reduced to almost Zero
Exact results interact with meeting
frequency, project tracking, staff
addition
No of Projects Handled per year –
Comparing Improvements
0
5
10
15
20
25
samestaff w/otracking
add 1staff w/otracking
samestaff withtracking
add 1staff withtracking
Current
1 per year
1 per 6 months
1 per 3 months
1 per 2 months
1 per month
Adding a staff doesn’t increase the project handling
rate but will increase the success rate by as much as
20-30% as more manpower will be available to
handle outreach program/volunteer program/actual
development of plots
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
samestaff w/otracking
add 1staff w/otracking
samestaff withtracking
add 1staff withtracking
Current
1 per year
1 per 6 months
1 per 3 months
1 per 2 months
1 per month
No of Successful Projects per year –
Comparing Improvements
Assuming the current 37.5% success rate for same
staff cases & +25% success rate for added staff cases
Improve
Database and document to track their projects
Don’t do meetings everyday
Improvement in the process flow
Plan to forecast what they might require and
what they can work on before-hand before the
problem crops up
Improved Lead Time
Improve
Out- reach and volunteer program
Identified and obtained information about UB groups and architecture departments whom they could contact
Created facebook community and profile
Suggestions to give free food and incentives to volunteers ( coupons from collaboration)
First Sunday of every month green day
Improve : Out-reach program
Advertising- newspapers, TV, radio, brochures
Active social networking
Tie up with public institutions like churches,
UB associations for volunteers.
Set up course credits with schools and
universities(like school of architecture-UB,
ECC,etc)