ANALYTICAL RESULTS FROM AN ENVIRONMENTAL

INVESTIGATION OF SIX SITES ON KIRTLAND AIR

FORCE BASE, NEW MEXICO, 1993-94

By Ralph Wilcox

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Open-File Report 94-547

Prepared in cooperation with the

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

Albuquerque, New Mexico 1995

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Gordon P. Eaton, Director

For additional information write to:

District ChiefU.S. Geological SurveyWater Resources Division4501 Indian School Rd. NE, Suite 200Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110

Copies of this report can be purchased from:

U.S. Geological SurveyEarth Science Information CenterOpen-File Reports SectionBox 25286, MS 517Denver Federal CenterDenver, Colorado 80225

Abstract ........mtroduction.

CONTENTSPage

Purpose and scope. ..................................................................................................................... 1Description of the study area .................................................................................................... 2

Site descriptions and analytical results.............................................................................................. 2

Site 22-Silver recovery units (WP-47) ..................................................................................... 2Site 23-Buried caustic drain line (ST-270), site 24-Neutralization pit (ST-271), and

site 25~Evaporation/infiltration pond (ST-273)................................................................ 2Site 26-Manzano fire training area (FT-14). ........... ................................................................. 9Site 27-Waste oil underground storage tank (ST-326) .......................................................... 11Field quality-control sample results......................................................................................... 11

Field data-collection techniques ......................................................................................................... 13

Soil sampling ............................................................................................................................... 13Pond-sediment sampling.. ......................................................................................................... 14Floor-drain sampling.... .............................................................................................................. 14Soil-gas sampling. ....................................................................................................................... 15

Laboratory analytical procedures.... ................................................................................................... 15

Detection limits and quantitation limits.................................................................................. 15Laboratory quality-assurance/quality-control procedures.......... ........................................ 16Duplicate control samples ......................................................................................................... 16Single control samples.... ............................................................................................................ 17Method blanks........................................................................................................................... 18Matrix-specific quality control.................................................................................................. 18Surrogate recoveries. .................................................................................................................. 18

Selected references.. ............................................................................................................................ 19

FIGURES

1. Map showing location of Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico......................................... 3

2. Map showing location of investigation sites 22 through 27, Kirtland Air Force Base,New Mexico. ........................................................................................................................... 4

3. Diagram showing sampling locations at site 22 Silver recovery units (WP-47)............... 5

4. Diagram showing soil sampling locations at site 23 Buried caustic drain line(ST-270) and site 24-Neutralization pit (ST-271) .............................................................. 6

5. Diagram showing sampling locations at site 25-Evaporation/ infiltrationpond (51^273).......................................................................................................................... 8

6. Diagram showing approximate sampling locations and topography at site 26 Manzano fire training area (FT-14)...................................................................................... 10

7. Diagram showing soil sampling locations at site 27-Waste oil underground storagetank (ST-326)........................................................................................................................... 12

iii

TABLES

Page1. Investigation sites and site numbers, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico.................... 20

2. Concentration of silver in water and sediment samples from floor drains atsite 22-Silver recovery units (WP-47)................................................................................. 21

3. Analytical results of soil samples from sites 23,24, and 25................................................... 22

4. Volatile organic compound field screening measurements of soil samples fromsite 26 Manzano fire training area...................................................................................... 26

5. Analytical results of soil samples from site 26........................................................................ 27

6. Analytical results of soil samples from site 27........................................................................ 41

7. Volatile organic compounds detected in 12 trip blank samples........................................... 44

8. Analytes detected in 15 equipment blank samples................................................................ 44

9. Analytical results of duplicate samples................................................................................... 45

10. Concentration of volatile organic compounds in standards for the gaschromatograph....................................................................................................................... 51

11. Analytical methods and sources............................................................................................... 51

12. Method detection limits and practical quantitation limits.................................................... 52

CONVERSION FACTORS AND VERTICAL DATUM

Multiply By To obtain

inch 2.540 centimeterfoot 0.3048 metermile 1.609 kilometersquare foot 0.09290 square meteracre 4,047 square metergallon 3.785 liter

Temperatures in degrees Fahrenheit (°F) or degrees Celsius (°C) can be converted as follows:

°F = 9/5(°C) + 32

°C = 5/9 (°F - 32)

Sea level: In this report "sea level" refers to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929-a geodetic datum derived from a general adjustment of the first-order level nets of the United States and Canada, formerly called Sea Level Datum of 1929.

IV

ANALYTICAL RESULTS FROM AN ENVIRONMENTAL

INVESTIGATION OF SIX SITES ON KIRTLAND AIR

FORCE BASE, NEW MEXICO, 1993-94

By Ralph Wilcox

ABSTRACT

The analytical results of a field environmental investigation of six sites on Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, are presented. The field data were collected September 9,1993, through February 3,1994. The six sites investigated include: (1) silver recovery units (site 22), (2) a buried caustic drain line (site 23), (3) a neutralization pit (site 24), (4) an evaporation/infiltration pond (site 25), (5) the Manzano fire training area (site 26), and (6) a waste oil underground storage tank (site 27). Samples of soil, pond sediment, soil gas, and water and sediment in floor drains were collected and analyzed in the investigation. Sediment and water samples collected from floor drains were analyzed for silver at site 22. Soil samples collected adjacent to sites 23-25 and pond- sediment samples collected from site 25 were analyzed for metals, fluoride, and pH. Soil samples collected from site 26 were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons, ignitability, metals, volatile and semivolatile organic compounds, dioxins, and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. Soil-gas samples collected adjacent to site 26 were qualitatively analyzed for volatile organic compounds using a portable gas chromatograph. Soil samples adjacent to site 27 were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons, metals, volatile and semivolatile organic compounds, and pH. Field quality-control samples (equipment blanks, trip blanks, and duplicates) were analyzed along with the environmental samples. Quality-control sample results are presented.

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this investigation is to characterize possible environmental contamination at six sites on Kirtland Air Force Base (AFB), New Mexico (table 1, back of the report). The six sites were investigated on Kirtland AFB because past or current site activities could have resulted in contamination of soil, pond sediment, and water and sediment in drains. The investigation was performed in cooperation with the U.S. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence, Brooks AFB, Texas.

Purpose and Scope

This report presents the analytical results of a field investigation of six sites on Kirtland AFB, New Mexico (figs. 1 and 2 and table 1). The six sites investigated include: (1) silver recovery units (site 22), (2) a buried caustic drain line (site 23), (3) a neutralization pit (site 24), (4) an evaporation/infiltration pond (site 25), (5) the Manzano fire training area (site 26), and (6) a waste oil underground storage tank (site 27). The scope of the investigation includes the collection and analysis of environmental samples of soil, pond sediment, soil gas, and water and sediment in floor drains. Field quality-control (QC) samples were collected and analyzed in association with the environmental samples. This report contains descriptions of the analytical results of the environmental samples and the associated field QC samples.

Description of the Study Area

Kirtland AFB is located southeast of and adjacent to the city of Albuquerque, in central New Mexico (fig. 1). The area designated as Kirtland AFB presently (1994) includes 52,287 acres owned, leased, or operated by the U.S. Air Force, some in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Forest Service. At present, the basic missions of Kirtland AFB are training, research, and the development of weapons.

Sites 22-25 and 27 are located in the northwestern part of Kirtland AFB (fig. 2), which is mostly an urban/industrial area with some urban residential areas. Site 26 is located in a relatively undeveloped area between the riding club and the Manzano area (fig. 2).

SITE DESCRIPTIONS AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Site 22-Silver Recovery Units (WP-47)

Site 22 is composed of four floor drains in the Kirtland AFB Photographic Laboratory in the north part of building 1000 that previously have received discharge from silver recovery units (fig. 3): one drain in room 128, location 2201; two drains in room 116, locations 2202 and 2203; and one drain in room 132, location 2204. Silver recovery units electrolytically recover silver, a by-product of the photographic process. Spent photographic "fixer" is run through a special cartridge within the unit. Wastewater from the unit discharges to the floor drain, which ultimately flows to the sanitary sewer. If a silver recovery unit malfunctions or operates inefficiently silver could be discharged.

The drain in room 132 has been inactive for several years. Silver recovery units have been active intermittently at the other three locations, but none of the drains was receiving wastewater from a silver recovery unit at the time of sampling (September 1993).

Samples of the material in the traps of the four floor drains were collected, as described later in the section on floor-drain sampling, and analyzed for silver. Tap water had been flowing into the floor drains at locations 2201, 2202, and 2203 prior to sampling. The aqueous and sediment fractions of the samples from these locations were separated at the laboratory, and each fraction was analyzed for silver. The sample from location 2204 consisted of dry pieces of rust. Table 2 (back of the report) contains the silver-concentration data reported in the samples collected at this site.

Site 23-Buried Caustic Drain Line (ST-270), Site 24-Neutralization Pit (ST-271), and Site 25-Evaporation/Infiltration Pond (ST-273)

Sites 23, 24, and 25 are located east of building 617 (fig. 4). Building 617 contains the Phillips Laboratory Chemical Laser Facility. The facility is currently active and has been operating since about 1974.

COLORADO 106°

KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE

TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES

0 1020304050 KILOMETERS

Figure 1.--Location of Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico.

3

oe*S

ITE

A

ND

N

UM

BE

RS

--

26

See

ta

ble

1 fo

r de

taile

d lis

t of

si

tes

BA

SE

T

RU

MA

N

EX

PLA

NA

TIO

NC

AR

LIS

LE

GA

TE

34

i ._

__

_ss| McC

OR

MIC

K

I R

AN

CH

28

R

E S

E R

V A

'I i O

f\

2 6

106

36

Figu

re

2.--

Loca

tion

of

inve

stig

atio

n si

tes

22

thro

ugh

27,

Kirt

land

A

ir Fo

rce

Bas

e,

New

M

exic

o.

A22

02E

XP

LA

NA

TIO

N

* F

LO

OR

-DR

AIN

S

AM

PL

ING

LO

CA

TIO

N

AN

D

LOC

AT

ION

N

UM

BE

R

QC

O z10

2 IQ

tIPX

CH

T

ROO

M

iu I

I u<

NO

T

TO

S

CA

LE

D i

=3

r -

ir p »n

US

U

12

C

I _J

_J_

JL

5

J?

22U

3

irT)

=ir

i2

20

1. ,

L

ii lr

130

HO

TIM

C

«00

u II

»»

U11

8 II

2204

.

»

BU

ILD

ING

10

00

Fig

ure

3.--

Sam

plin

g lo

catio

ns

at

site

2

2-S

ilve

r re

cove

ry

units

(W

P-4

7).

BU

ILD

ING

617

BU

RIE

D

6-I

NC

H

PV

CF

IRE

C

AU

ST

IC

DR

AIN

LI

NE

HY

DR

AN

T2

30

1U .....

......

......

SLT

i..2.

3_-B

UR

IED

W

AT

ER

LI

NE

UN

US

ED

T

RE

NC

H

WIT

H

ME

TA

L G

RA

TE

C

OV

ER

2302

EX

PLA

NA

TIO

N

SO

IL S

AM

PLI

NG

LO

CA

TIO

N

AN

D

LOC

AT

ION

N

UM

BE

R--

S

ampl

e ho

les

pow

er d

riven

to

de

pths

be

twee

n 7

and

14

feet

cc o z

r-x~

-

*

X

X

X

X X

-

25 I

EV

AP

OR

AT

ION

/IN

FIL

TR

AT

ION

PO

ND

SIT

E

25

50

F

EE

T

1 15

ME

TE

RS

Fig

ure

4. -S

oil

sam

plin

g lo

catio

ns

at

site

23

--B

urie

d ca

ustic

dr

ain

line

(ST

-270

) an

d si

te

24--

Neutr

aliz

atio

n

pit

(ST

-271

).

The caustic drain line is constructed of 6-inch polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe. A south- flowing drain originates inside building 617, and an east-flowing drain originates along the southern edge of the building. The drains converge near the southeastern corner of building 617 (fig. 4). The east-flowing drain line is buried (base of pipe) approximately 0.7 foot at its origin. The base of the drain pipe is approximately 2.2 feet below land surface where it discharges into the neutralization pit. The drain conveys diluted, spent laser fuel from the building 617 complex. The laser fuel is an equal mixture of hydrogen peroxide (70 percent semiconductor grade) fixed with potassium hydroxide. Deuterated hydrogen peroxide also has been used in small amounts. When the fuel is depleted it is flushed out of the laser with tap water and pumped into the caustic drain. The depleted fuel has a very high pH. The drain also conveys liquid wastes received from scrubbers in building 617. Potassium hydroxide is used to scrub chlorine and iodine gases.

The neutralization pit is a concrete box measuring 8.5 feet wide by 16.5 feet long by 6.1 feet deep. The top of the pit is open to the atmosphere and covered with a metal grate. The base of the pit is approximately 1 foot thick, and the thickness of the walls is not known. The concrete is visibly pitted on the base and the lower part of the walls of the pit, but no cracks or holes are visible. In the neutralization pit the depleted laser fuel and/or scrubber wastes are neutralized by adding either hydrochloric or sulfuric acid until the pH is reduced to 7. In the past nitric acid may have been used as the neutralizing agent. The pH-neutral water is then pumped out of the pit and into the evaporation/infiltration pond. /

The evaporation/infiltration pond is approximately 40 feet wide by 120 feet long and 6 feet deep at the center (fig. 5). Neutralized water flows into the pond through a 2.5-inch PVC pipe located in the southwest portion of the pond. The pond is estimated to receive approximately 400,000 gallons of neutralized water per year. The water is allowed to evaporate and infiltrate into the fine-grained sandy base.

Soil samples were collected from three locations adjacent to the caustic drain line (fig. 4), using soil sampling methods described later for hydraulically driven holes. The soil sample locations are approximately 2 feet to the side of the drain. One composite soil sample was collected at each location. The samples were composited over a 2-foot depth interval; the top of the sample interval was 3 feet beneath the drain. The soil samples were analyzed for metals (including antimony, mercury, selenium, and thallium), fluoride, pH, and moisture. Table 3 (back of the report) contains the analyte data reported in the samples collected at sites 23, 24, and 25. Only analytes with reported concentrations in one or more environmental samples are listed in table 3.

Soil samples were collected from two locations adjacent to the neutralization pit (fig. 4) using the same methodology as at the caustic drain. The sample locations were placed as close to the pit as possible. Sample location 2401 is located 6.8 feet north of the pit because the drilling equipment could not be maneuvered closer along the north side. One composite soil sample was collected from the 12- to 14-foot depth interval. Sample location 2402 is located approximately 1 foot south of the pit. Two composite soil samples were collected from the 9.1- to 11.0-foot and 14.5- to 16.5-foot depth intervals. The soil samples were analyzed for the same analytes as samples collected at the caustic drain, except for the deep sample collected at location 2402, which was analyzed only for metals (excluding mercury) (table 3).

02505BACKGROUND SOIL

SAMPLING LOCATION

EXPLANATION

2503 BOTTOM SEDIMENT SAMPLING k LOCATION AND LOCATION NUMBER

,2507 SOIL SAMPLING LOCATION AND LOCATION NUMBER

POND IS 5 FEET DEEP (TOP OF BERM TO LOW

POINT OF POND).BERM IS 3 TO 6

FEET ABOVE ADJACENTLAND SURFACE

02508

. \ \ M /

25i

50 FEET

i 7.5 15 METERS

250;

\f NEUTRALIZATION

PIT

-X X X *

2504

EVAPORATION/INFILTRATION

POND

A 2503

,2502

6-INCH EMERGENCYDRAIN FROM

HYDROGEN PEROXIDESTORAGE AREA

2501 \INFLOW PIPE

2-5-INCH PVC WITH2-FOOT RISER

-2509

Figure 5.-Sampling locations at site 25-Evaporation/infiltration pond (ST-273).

8

Bottom-sediment samples were collected at four locations in the evaporation/infiltration pond (fig. 5) using the methods described later in the section on pond-sediment sampling. At the time of sampling (September 9,1993) the pond was approximately 1 foot deep at the sampling locations. Bottom-sediment samples were analyzed for the same analytes as soil samples collected at the caustic drain (table 3).

Soil samples were collected from four locations adjacent to the pond (fig. 5) and one location approximately 100 feet north of the pond (background soil sampling location for sites 23, 24, and 25) using the methodologies described later for pond sediment and hydraulically driven holes. Soil samples were collected at the surface and a composite sample from the 8.0- to 10.0-foot depth interval at each of the four locations adjacent to the pond (eight soil samples total). These soil samples were analyzed for lead. A composite soil sample was collected from the 4.0- to 8.0-foot depth interval at the background location (2505) and analyzed for the same analytes as the soil samples collected at the caustic drain (table 3).

Site 26-Manzano Fire Training Area (FT-14)

Site 26 is located near the Manzano area (fig. 2). The site, which is abandoned, consists of two burn pits about 60 feet apart (fig. 6). Each pit contains about 400 square feet of soil darkened with carbonaceous material. The total area of the western pit is about 500 square feet, and the area of the eastern pit is slightly more than 1,000 square feet. Both pits are 2 to 3 feet deep, with earthen berms that rise 1 to 2 feet above the surrounding land surface. Information is limited on the procedures used and the duration and frequency of fire training exercises. The site may have been abandoned for 20 years.

Soil samples were collected from 11 locations in the burn pits (fig. 6) using soil sampling methods described later for hand augering, hollow-stem augering, and hydraulically driven holes. In the western pit a soil sample was collected near the surface (0.2-foot depth) at each location and then every 5 feet to a depth of 21 feet (composite samples from depths of 4 to 6 feet, 9 to 11 feet, 14 to 16 feet, and 19 to 21 feet). At location 2603 additional, deeper soil samples were collected approximately every 10 feet to a depth of 83 feet (composite samples from depths of 29 to 31 feet, 39 to 41 feet, 50 to 51 feet, 60 to 61 feet, 70 to 71 feet, and a point sample at 83 feet). In the eastern pit a soil sample was collected at the surface (0.2-foot depth) at each location and then every 5 feet to a depth of 11 feet (composite samples from depths of 4 to 6 feet and 9 to 11 feet).

Soil samples collected at the Manzano fire training area were screened for VOC contamination in the field by measuring with a Photovac TIP that had been calibrated with isobutylene calibration gas having a concentration of 100 parts per million plus or minus 5 percent. Table 4 (back of the report) lists the field screening measurements for this site.

Soil samples collected at the Manzano fire training area were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons, ignitability, metals (including antimony, mercury, selenium, and thallium), VOC's, semivolatile organic compounds, dioxins, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, and moisture. Table 5 (back of the report) contains the analyte data reported for the samples collected at site 26. Only analytes with reported concentrations in one or more environmental samples are listed in table 5.

CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET. DATUM IS SEA LEVEL

BACKGROUNDSAMPLINGLOCATION

FOR

APPROXIMATE LOCATION

MANZAN \DUMP (SITE

FIRE TRAINING PIT IS A DEPRESSION 2-3 FEET DEEP WITH AN EARTHEN BERM 1-2 FEET ABOVE SURROUNDING LAND SURFACE

oc o

SG09DISCOLORED SOIL, BLACK SG10

SG02

BOREHOLE (83 FEET DEEP) SOIL SAMPLING LOCATION AND LOCATION NUMBER

DRIVEN HOLE (11iMPLING LOCATION. TO 20 FEET

DEEP) SOIL SAAND LOCATION NUMBERKIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE STAGE 2A INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM BOREHOLE (100 FEET DEEP) SOIL SAMPLING LOCATIONSOIL GAS SAMPLING LOCATION AND LOCATION NUMBER

1 DISCOLORED SOIL, BLACK SG03

NOT TO SCALE

Figure 6.-Approximate sampling locations and topography at site 26-Manzano fire training area (FT-14).

10

A soil-gas survey was conducted at site 26 using the soil-gas sampling method described later. Soil gas was sampled at 12 locations (fig. 6): four locations surrounding the eastern pit and eight locations surrounding the western pit. No VOC's were detected in the soil-gas samples.

Site 27-Waste Oil Underground Storage Tank (ST-326)

Site 27 is located west of building 20375, the auto hobby shop (fig. 7). The tank is used for temporary storage of waste engine oil and dry cleaning solvent used at the auto hobby shop. The site is active, and the tank may have been in place for 20 to 30 years. The tank is filled by a drain in building 20375. The drain line is attached at a "T" to a vertical discharge pipe attached to the top of the tank. A contractor periodically (every 3 to 4 months) pumps out the contents of the tank through the discharge pipe. The storage tank is constructed of stainless steel and has a capacity of 500 gallons. The base of the tank is buried 7.5 feet beneath the top of a concrete box located at the surface. The orientation of the tank is not known.

Soil samples were collected from four locations adjacent to the storage tank (fig. 7) and one location 139 feet north-northwest of the tank (background soil sampling location for site 27) using the soil-sampling method described later for hydraulically driven holes. Each of the four sample locations adjacent to the tank is located 7 feet from the tank discharge pipe. Two composite soil samples were collected at each location: an upper sample with the top of the composited depth interval at the base of the tank and a lower sample with the top of the composited depth interval 5 feet below the base of the tank. Two composite soil samples were collected at the background location from depth intervals of 6 to 12 feet and 13 to 15 feet.

Soil samples collected at site 27 were screened for VOC contamination in the field by measuring with a Photovac TIP that had been calibrated with isobutylene calibration gas with a concentration of 100 parts per million plus or minus 5 percent. The screening measurements ranged from 0.4 to 1.0 part per million.

The soil samples collected at the waste oil underground storage tank were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons, metals (including antimony, mercury, selenium, and thallium), VOC's, semivolatile organic compounds, pH, and moisture. Table 6 (back of the report) contains the analyte data reported for the samples collected at site 27. Only analytes with reported concentrations in environmental samples are listed in table 6.

Field Quality-Control Sample Results

The trip blank sample is used to determine if environmental samples (samples collected at the sites) have been contaminated by VOC's while the samples are being held in the field or being shipped to the laboratory. All environmental samples were shipped to Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory (RMAL), a division of ENSECO, Inc., in Arvada, Colorado, for VOC analysis. The samples were accompanied by a trip blank sample that was also analyzed for VOC's. The trip blank samples were prepared with reagent water by the laboratory and shipped to the field. A trip blank sample was placed in the cooler that would hold samples for VOC analysis at the beginning of each field sampling day. The trip blank sample stayed with the environmental samples until they were unpacked at the laboratory. Twelve trip blanks were analyzed during this investigation. Not all the trip blanks contained detected VOC's. The VOC's detected in the trip blanks are listed in table 7 (back of the report).

11

/

F c cA

2705

L BACKGROUND T SOIL SAMPLING \ LOCATION-

\ \ Unpaved area \ \ 139 feet north-

\ northwest of \ metal cover

\ ASPHALT

\

EXPLANATION

2704 SOIL SAMPLING LOCATION AND LOCATION NUMBER--

Sample holes power driven to depths between 14.5 and 18.5 feet

0I

0

2702

METAL COVER /^ '

OVER INFLOW/ DISCHARGE PIPE 0,n>l

OF STORAGE 2704 TANK

10 20 FEET i ii i 3 6 METERS

CONCRETE RAMP

2703

BUILDING 20375 AUTO HOBBY SHOP

Figure 7.--Soil sampling locations at site 27-Waste oil underground storage tank (ST-326).

12

The equipment blank sample is used to determine if environmental samples have been contaminated by field sampling equipment. One equipment blank sample was collected for each day of sample collection. The equipment blank samples were prepared by pouring reagent water through the sampling device and collecting the water in sample containers. Equipment blank samples were analyzed for the same constituents as the environmental samples collected at each site. Sixteen equipment blank samples were collected during this investigation. The analytes detected in 15 of the equipment blanks are listed in table 8 (back of the report). The 16th equipment blank sample was collected at site 22 and was analyzed only for silver; none was detected.

The duplicate sample is used to determine the precision of analytical results. Precision is defined as the degree of similarity between independent measurements of the same quantity, without reference to the known or true value. The precision of analytical data can be assessed by calculating the relative percent difference (RPD) between environmental samples and duplicate samples. The smaller the RPD is, the more precise and reproducible the analytical data are. The RPD is calculated using the following formula:

RPD = absolute value (environmental sample - duplicate samp (environmental sample + duplicate sample) / 2

ie) x 100 (1)

One field duplicate sample was collected for every 10 environmental samples and analyzed for the same constituents as the environmental samples. A duplicate sample was collected by splitting an environmental sample into two sets of sample containers. The duplicate samples were assigned consecutive sample numbers and shipped to RMAL as environmental samples. Ten duplicate samples were collected during this investigation. The RPE^s for analytes detected in duplicate samples are listed in table 9 (back of the report). The RPD has been calculated only for analytes detected in both the environmental sample and the environmental duplicate sample.

FIELD DATA-COLLECTION TECHNIQUES

A total of 113 samples of soil, pond sediment, floor-drain water and sediment, and soil gas were collected at the six sites from September 9, 1993, through February 3, 1994 (figs. 3-7). Samples are identified by a 12-character string of letters and numbers. For example, the field sample identification number KAFB260502-1 is derived as follows: KAFB signifies Kirtland AFB, 26 signifies the investigation site, 05 signifies the sample location, 02 signifies the second sample collected at this location, and -1 signifies a soil or predominantly sediment sample. A field sample number ending with -2 would signify a water sample.

Soil Sampling

Soil sampling began September 14, 1993. The initial phase of soil sampling at sites 23-27 was completed November 17, 1993. Soil samples were collected using the following three methods: (1) shallow (0.2-foot depth) samples were collected with a hand auger, (2) intermediate (0.2- to 50-foot depth) samples were collected using the Geoprobe1 coring system, and (3) deep (greater than 50-foot depth) samples were collected using a hollow-stem auger coring method.

use of brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey.

13

Soil samples were collected from near land surface (0.2-foot depth) at site 26 (fig. 6) with a stainless steel hand auger. Sample jars were filled by pouring in the auger contents. Samples collected for volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis were shipped in 40-milliliter glass vials. The hand auger was decontaminated prior to use at each sampling location by the following method: (1) scrubbing with a Liqui-nox and potable water solution, (2) rinsing with potable water, (3) rinsing with deionized water, (4) rinsing with pesticide-free grade methanol, and (5) rinsing with pesticide-free grade hexane and allowing to dry.

The Geoprobe coring system was used to collect soil samples between depths of 0.2 and 50 feet at sites 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27. Soil samples were collected by driving a 2-foot-long steel core barrel, containing an inner sleeve, through the appropriate depth interval. The inner sleeve filled with soil as the core barrel was driven downward. Soil samples that were analyzed for inorganic compounds were collected in acetate or brass sleeves, and those analyzed for organic compounds were collected in brass sleeves. The brass sleeves are 2 feet in length and approximately 1 inch in diameter. A plastic outer cover holds together four 6-inch sections of brass sleeve. Samples for VOC analysis were prepared by separating one of the middle 6-inch sections of sleeve, covering the ends with oil-free aluminum foil, and capping the ends. Sample jars for other analyses were then directly filled from the remaining sections of brass sleeve.

The Geoprobe coring tools (drill rods, core barrels, and associated equipment) were decontaminated prior to use at each sampling location by washing with a high-pressure hot water solution of Liqui-nox and potable water and rinsing with high-pressure hot potable water. The acetate and brass sleeves were decontaminated in the same manner as the drilling tools, followed by a rinse with deionized water.

Soil samples from depths of 50 feet or more at site 26 (borehole 2603) (fig. 6) were collected in a steel split-spoon core barrel using the hollow-stem auger drilling method. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Wyoming District provided support for hollow-stem auger drilling and associated soil sampling. Samples were collected for VOC analysis by pushing a brass sleeve, 6 inches long and approximately 1 inch in diameter, into the core. The ends of the brass sleeve were covered with oil-free aluminum foil, then capped. Sample jars for other analyses were then filled by pushing them into the core.

The back of the drill rig and the augers were decontaminated prior to moving onto the drill site by washing with a high-pressure hot water solution of Liqui-nox and potable water and rinsing with high-pressure hot potable water. The split-spoon sample barrel was decontaminated prior to each sample run in the same manner as described above for the hand auger.

Pond-Sediment Sampling

Pond-sediment samples were collected September 9, 1993. Sediment samples were collected from the bottom of the evaporation/infiltration pond (site 25) by pushing sample jars directly into the sediment. Soil samples were collected at the land surface adjacent to the pond using the same technique.

Floor-Drain Sampling

Floor-drain samples were collected September 21-22,1993. Samples of water and sediment from the traps of four floor drains at site 22 (fig. 3) were collected with a plastic scoop or peristaltic pump. The floor drain at location 2204 was sampled with a scoop made from a 250-milliliter polyethylene sample bottle. At the time of sampling, this drain had not been used for several years, and the trap contained what appeared to be pieces of rust.

14

The other three floor drains at this site were sampled with a peristaltic pump. The suction end of the pump tubing was placed at the base of the trap, about 2 feet below the floor surface, and an acetate tube was used to stir up sediment in the trap as a water and sediment sample was pumped from each trap. The peristaltic pump tubing and the acetate tube were decontaminated prior to use at each sampling location by the following method: (1) washing with a Liqui-nox and potable water solution, (2) rinsing with potable water, and (3) rinsing with deionized water.

Soil-Gas Sampling

A soil-gas survey was conducted at site 26 (fig. 6) on January 19-20,1994. At each soil-gas location a steel probe rod was hydraulically driven to a depth of 5 feet with the Geoprobe drilling system. The tip of each probe rod was equipped with a disposable steel drive point. The probe rod was retracted approximately 1 inch to drop the disposable drive point and to expose the open hole for soil-gas withdrawal. A low-volume vacuum pump was used to withdraw soil gas at a rate of approximately 200 milliliters per minute. The flow of soil gas was monitored with a flowmeter to ensure that the soil-gas probe was not plugged and that soil gas was being collected. Two liters of soil gas were withdrawn to purge the system prior to collection of a soil- gas sample for analysis. The soil-gas samples were collected with gas-tight syringes through a septum in a sampling port located in line between the probe and the vacuum pump.

The soil-gas samples were analyzed with a Photo vac 10S50 gas chromatograph equipped with a photoionization detector (10.6-electron volt lamp potential) and a dimethyl pplysiloxane capillary column. The gas chromatograph was configured for precolumn backflush operation.

Standards were prepared daily at two concentrations (table 10, back of the report) from a stock-standard solution obtained from the USGS National Water Quality Laboratory. The methodology used to prepare the working standards is described by Brock (1990). Standards were analyzed as required to monitor changing response factors and retention times. Other QC samples (instrument blanks, equipment blanks, and ambient conditions blanks) were analyzed to check for possible sources of false-positive results.

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

RMAL performed chemical analyses of soil, sediment, and water samples. Dioxin analyses were performed by ENSECO California Analytical Laboratory. The analytical methods used in this investigation and the sources of the analytical methods are listed in table 11 (back of the report).

Detection Limits and Quantitation Limits

The instrument detection limit (IDL) is the smallest signal above background noise that an instrument can reliably detect. IDUs are laboratory specific and are determined en the basis of the analytical results of seven replicate standards on 3 nonconsecutive days.

The method detection limit (MDL) (table 12, back of the report) is the minimum concentration of an analyte that can be identified, measured, and reported with 99-percent confidence that the analyte concentration is greater than zero. MDL's are laboratory specific and are determined on the basis of the analytical results of a minimum of seven replicate samples spiked at one to five times the expected detection limit.

15

The practical quantitation limit (PQL) (table 12) is the lowest level that can be reliably determined within specified limits of precision and accuracy during routine laboratory operating conditions. The laboratory uses the term reporting limit (RL) instead of QL.

PQUs are determined by the laboratory approximately annually for each analyte in each method. The PQUs are based on MDL data for organic and wet chemistry analyses and on IDL data for metals analyses. The PQUs are generally two to five times the IDUs or MDUs. PQUs are adjusted for sample dilution. Results between IDL/MDL and PQL are flagged with the letter J as estimates because, by definition, the reliability of the data at this level is questionable.

Laboratory Quality-Assurance/Quality-Control Procedures

The laboratory quality-assurance/quality-control (QA/QC) program consisted of operational controls used to ensure that the generated data meet predefined requirements for precision and accuracy and that the instituted system documents the effectiveness of these controls. The QA/QC program has provisions to meet the following three objectives: (1) monitor the laboratory's daily performance of an analytical method, (2) assess the effect of a specific sample matrix on the performance of the analytical method, and (3) monitor long-term performance to detect trends or systematic error. Laboratory performance QC was based on the use of a standard control matrix to generate precision and accuracy data that were compared on a daily basis to control limits. This information, in conjunction with method blank data, was used to assess daily laboratory performance. Matrix-specific QC is based on the use of actual environmental samples for precision and accuracy determinations, and commonly relies on the analysis of matrix spikes, matrix duplicates, and matrix spike duplicates. This information, supplemented with field blank results, was used to assess the effect of the matrix and field conditions on analytical data. The laboratory reported all laboratory QC results with each set of environmental sample results. The quality assessment of the data was based on the results of laboratory and field QC results.

Laboratory performance QC was provided as a standard part of every routine analysis through the analysis of laboratory control samples (LCS's). The LCS's include duplicate control samples (DCS's), single control samples (SCS's), and method blanks. LCS's are well- characterized, laboratory-generated samples used to monitor the laboratory's day-to-day performance of routine analytical methods. Certain LCS's were used to monitor the precision and accuracy of the analytical process, and others were used to identify any background interference or contamination of the analytical system that could lead to the reporting of elevated concentration levels or false positive data. Results of the LCS's were compared to well-defined laboratory acceptance criteria to determine whether the laboratory system was "in control." Controlling lab operations with LCS's (as opposed to matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate samples) is advantageous because LCS's can differentiate low recoveries due to procedural errors from those due to matrix effects. The three types of LCS's are described below.

Duplicate Control Samples

Duplicate control samples (DCS's) were used to monitor the precision and accuracy of the analytical system on an ongoing basis. Each DCS consists of a standard control matrix that was spiked with a group of target compounds representative of the method analyte. A DCS pair was analyzed for every 20 samples processed by the method. DCS's were analyzed with environmental samples to provide evidence that the laboratory was performing the method within accepted QC guidelines for accuracy and precision.

16

Accuracy (average recovery of each analyte in the DCS pair) and precision (RPD between each analyte in the DCS pair) data were compared to control limits that were established for each of the analytes contained in the DCS. The control limits for analytes spiked into DCS were defined on the basis of historical DCS data. Control limits for accuracy for each analyte were based on the historical average recovery (mean of the average recoveries of the DCS pairs) plus or minus three standard deviation units. Control limits for precision for each analyte were based on the historical RPD and range from zero (no difference between DCS results) to the average RPD plus three standard deviation units.

Analytical data generated with a DCS pair that is within the established control limits were judged to be in control. Data generated with a DCS pair that is outside the control limits were considered suspect and were repeated or reported with qualifiers.

DCS's were established for each routine analytical method. Reagent water was used as the control matrix for the analysis of aqueous samples. The DCS compounds were spiked into reagent water and carried through the appropriate steps of the analysis. The control matrix for solid samples for organic analyses was standard Ottawa sand, an American Society for Testing Materials-approved material used for highway construction, due to its fine degree of homogeneity. The DCS compounds were spiked into the Ottawa sand and carried through the appropriate steps of the analysis. The DCS for solid samples for metals analyses was a spiked sand obtained from a commercial source. The DCS for some wet chemistry analytes was obtained from a commercial source. /

Single Control Samples

As previously stated, a DCS pair was analyzed for every 20 samples to measure the precision and accuracy of an analysis on an ongoing basis. Samples were often analyzed in lots of less than 20, however, due to holding time or turnaround time requirements. Because it was necessary to have a measure of laboratory performance with each batch of samples processed, the laboratory instituted the SCS program.

An SCS consists of a control matrix spiked with surrogate compounds appropriate to the method being used. In cases where no surrogate was available (for example, metals or conventional analyses), the analytes used for the DCS are spiked into the control sample. An SCS was prepared for each sample lot for which the DCS pair was not analyzed. Recovery data generated from the SCS were compared to control limits that had been established for each of the compounds being monitored. Control limits for analytes spiked into SCS were defined on the basis of historical data. Control limits for SCS components were based on the historical average recovery in the SCS plus or minus three standard deviation units.

Analytical data generated with an SCS within the control limits were judged to be in control. Data generated with an SCS outside of acceptance criteria were considered suspect and were reanalyzed or reported with qualifiers. The protocols for evaluating SCS's were identical to those established for DCS's.

17

Method Blanks

Method blanks, also known as reagent, analytical, or preparation blanks, were analyzed to assess the level of background interference or contamination that existed in the analytical system and that might lead to the reporting of elevated concentration levels or false positive data. As part of the standard laboratory QC program, a method blank was analyzed with every batch of samples processed. A method blank consists of reagents specific to the method that were carried through every aspect of the procedure, including preparation, clean up, and analysis. The results of the method blank analysis were evaluated, in conjunction with other QC information, to determine the acceptability of the data generated for that batch of samples.

Ideally, the concentration of target analytes in the method blank would be below the quantitation limit for that analyte. In practice, however, some common laboratory solvents and metals were difficult to eliminate to the levels reported in environmental analyses. Therefore, criteria for determining method blank acceptability were based on consideration of the analytical techniques used, analytes reported, and reporting limits required.

If the blank did not meet acceptance criteria, the source of contamination was investigated and appropriate corrective action was taken and documented. Investigation included an evaluation of the data to determine the extent and effect of the contamination on the sample results. Corrective actions included a reanalysis of the blank and/or repreparation and reanalysis of the blank and all associated samples. Sample results were not corrected for blank contamination.

Matrix-Specific Quality Control

Matrix-specific QC was used to assess the effects of a sample matrix on the analytical data. The main elements of matrix-specific QC in this investigation were analyzing matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates and monitoring the recovery of surrogate compounds from environmental samples.

A matrix spike is an environmental sample spiked with known concentrations of analytes in the laboratory. A matrix spike duplicate is a duplicate environmental sample spiked in the same manner as the matrix spike, although the spiked concentrations may be different. The matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate, in addition to an unspiked sample, were taken separately through the entire analytical procedure, and the recovery of the analytes was calculated. The results were compared to determine the effects of the matrix on the precision and accuracy of the analysis. Results are expressed as percent recovery and RPD.

Surrogate Recoveries

Surrogates are organic compounds similar to analytes in chemical behavior but not normally found in environmental samples. Surrogates were added to samples to monitor the effect of the matrix on the accuracy of the analysis. Results are reported in terms of percent recovery.

The laboratory added surrogates to samples that required gas chromatograph/mass spectrometry analysis and reported these surrogate recoveries in the sample data package. The surrogate recoveries were used by the laboratory primarily to assess matrix effects. Obvious problems with sample preparation and analysis, such as evaporation to dryness or a leaking septum, that can lead to poor surrogate spike recoveries were ruled out prior to attributing the low surrogate recoveries to matrix effects.

18

SELECTED REFERENCES

American Society for Testing Materials, 1984,1984 annual book of ASTM standards, v. 04.08~Soil and rock; building stones: Philadelphia, Penn., American Society for Testing Materials, 830 p.

Brock, R.D., 1990, A protocol for onsite screening of volatile organic compounds using a portable gas chromatograph: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 90-379,12 p.

Engineering Science, Inc., 1981, Installation Restoration Program, phase I-Kirtland Air Force Base: Atlanta, Ga., Engineering Science, Inc., 300 p.

Enseco, 1989, Enseco, Inc. quality assurance program plan for environmental chemical monitoring, revision 3.3: Somerset, N.J., Enseco, Inc., 58 p.

Kearney/Centaur, 1988, Preliminary review/visual site inspection, Kirtland Air Force Base, Albuquerque, New Mexico: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VI, Contract no. 68-01-7374, variously paged.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1983, Methods for chemical an; lysis of water and wastes: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 600/4-79-020, variously paged.

.1986, Test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods (3d ed.):U.S. Environmental Protection Agency SW-846, variously paged.

19

Table 1. Investigation sites and site numbers, Kirtiand Air Force Base, New Mexico [Site locations shown in figure 2. , unknown]

Site name

U.S. Geological Kirtiand AirSurvey Force Base site

site number number

U.S.Environmental

ProtectionAgencynumber

Silver recovery units

Buried caustic drain line

Neutralization pit

Evaporation/ infiltration pond

Manzano fire training area

Waste oil under­ ground storage tank

22

23

WP-47

ST-270

8-6

9-14

24

25

26

27

ST-271

ST-273

FT- 14

ST-326

9-15

9-16

8-35

20

Tabl

e 2.

-Con

cent

rati

on o

f silv

er in

wat

er a

nd s

edim

ent s

ampl

es f

rom

floo

r dr

ains

at s

ite 2

2 S

ilve

r re

cove

ry u

nits

(W

P-47

)

[Met

hod

num

bers

list

ed in

tabl

e 7.

Site

loca

tion

show

n in

figu

re 3

. R

epor

ted

in m

illig

ram

s pe

r lit

er f

or w

ater

and

in m

illi-

gr

ams

per

kilo

gram

(dr

y w

eigh

t) f

or s

edim

ent

ND

, not

det

ecte

d;},

estim

ated

val

ue, b

elow

qua

ntita

tion

limit;

,

no d

ata]

Field sample identification:

Batch identification (w

ater

) :

Batch identification (sediment) :

Method

Action

and

analysis

Media

level

SW7761

Silver

Water

10.05

Silver

Sediment

400

KAFB220102-2

031351-0002

031351-0007

Quan

t i t

at i on

Resu

lts

limit

ND

0.0010

412,

000

50.0

KAFB220103-2

031351-0003

031351-0008

Quantitation

Results

limit

0.00

065

0.00050

241,000

50.0

KAFB220201-2

031351-0004

031351-0009

Quantitation

Resu

lts

limit

0.00

40

J 0.0050

6,33

0 10.0

KAFB220301-2

0313

51-0

005

0313

51-0

010

Quantitation

Results

limit

0.00

72

0.0050

68.5

5.0

KAFB220401-1

031351-0006

Quantitation

Results

limit

14.8

10

-0

1 New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission ground-water standard.

Tab

le 3

.--A

naly

tical

res

ults

of s

oil s

ampl

es f

rom

site

s 23

,24,

and

25

[Met

hod

num

bers

list

ed in

tabl

e 7.

Site

loca

tions

sho

wn

in f

igur

es 4

and

5. V

alue

s in

mill

igra

ms

per

kilo

gram

(dr

y w

eigh

t)

unle

ss o

ther

wis

e in

dica

ted.

--,

no d

ata;

J es

tim

ated

val

ue, b

elow

qua

ntita

tion

limit;

ND

, not

det

ecte

d]

Field sample identification:

KAFB230101-1

Batch identification--

031199-0020

Depth (feet):

4.0

to 6.

0

Method number and

analysis

Action level

Results

E300.0

Fluoride

SW6010 Aluminum

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chro

mium

Coba

ltCopper

Iron

Lead

Magn

esiu

mManganese

Nickel

Potassium

Sodium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW7471 Mercury

SW90

45 pH (pH

units)

12.8

6,920

5,600

140

0.16

0.20

J40

ND

98,100

400

3.1

J3.0

JND

7,110 ND

4,100

400

80.9

1,600

6.6

J93

1 ND 21.9

24,000

14.4

24

ND 8.

7

Quan

t it at io

n li

mit

1.

69. 2. 0. 1.

115 4. 9. 4. 11.

11.

92. 2.

13.

231

231 6. 4. 0,

.2 .3 .3 .92

.2 .6 .2 .6 .5 .5 .4 .3 .9 .9 .6 .12

KAFB230201-1

031199-0021

4.5 to

6-5

KAFB230301-1

031199-0022

5.0

to 7.

0

Quantitation

Quantitation

Results

limit

Resu

lts

limit

9.5

7,150 83.8 0.37

J0.37

J79,200 4.

83.

4 J

3.2

8,160 ND

3,990

144 8.

581

1 ND 20.3

19.3

ND 8.

8

1.

32. 1, 0. 0. 54. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

43. 1. 6.

109

109 3. 2. 0.

--

.1 .6 .1 .44

.54

.4 .4 .4 .2 .4 .4 .5 .1 .5 .3 .2 .11

8.0

6,620

159 0.

44ND

74,2

00

3.7

J2.

6 J

3.0

6,970 ND

3,510 94.6 6.8

741 ND 19.1

19.1 0.070

J

9.4

1,

33, 1. 0, 0,

55. 4, 4, 2, 5, 5',

44. 1, 6.

Ill

111 3 2 0,

--

.1 .3 .1 .44

.55

.5 .4 .4 .2 .5 .5 .4 .1 .7 .3 .2 .11

KAFB240101-1

031199-0023

12.0

to

14

.0Quant i t at i on

Results

limit

10.

19,4

00 49. 1.

ND

49,0

00 14. 7. 9.

18,3

009.

7,230

312 14.

3,740 ND 47.

46. 0. 8.

.7 .2 .0 .5 .3 .0 .5 .6 .0 .4 .091

J

.1

1.

35. 1. 0. 0.

58. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

46, 1. 7,

117

117 3, 2, 0.

--

.2 .1 .2 .47

.59

.5 .7 .7 .3 .9 .9 .8 .2 .0 .5 .3 .12

Tabl

e 3.

--A

naly

tical

res

ults

of s

oil s

ampl

es f

rom

site

s 23

,24,

and

25

Con

tinu

edField sample identification:

Batch identification:

Depth (f

eet)

:

Method number and

analysis

Action level

E300.0

Fluoride

SW6010

Aluminum

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Molybdenum

Nickel

Potassium

Silver

Sodium

Tin

Vanadium

Zinc

SW7041

Ant imony

SW7471

Mercury

SW9045

pH (p

H units)

-- -- 245,600 0.

1640 __

400 -- -- __ --

400

400

1,600 __

400 -- -- --

24,000 32 24 --

KAFB240201-1

031199-0026

9.1

to 11.0

Quant it at

ion

Results

limit

6.1

14,6

00 45.6

284 6.

05.

6

80,9

006.2

53.9

30.6

15,0

00 55.6

9,960

300 49.3

63.0

6,870 4.

2 J

11,0

00 194 78.6

74.9

ND

ND 9.7

1.

33.

33. 1. 0. 0.

55. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

44. 1. 4. 6.

110 4.

110 55. 3. 2. 4, 0.

--

.1 .1 .1 .1 .44

.55

.2 .4 ,4 .2 .5 .5 .1 .1 .4 .6 .4 .2 .3 .2 .4 .11

KAFB240202-1

033656-0002

14.5

to 16.5

Results

-

8,800ND

105 0.

90ND

19,9

005.

95.

26.

111

,000

7.1

4,840

319ND 8.

7

1,630 NDNDND 22.2

30.4

ND -- --

KAFB250101-1

031138-0001

0.2

Quant it at ion

limit

Results

33.

33. 1. 0. 0.

55. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

44. 1. 4. 6.

Ill 4.

332 55. 3. 2. 4, -- --

,2 .2 .1 .44

.55

.3 .4 .4 .2 ,5 .5 .2 .1 .4 .6 .4 .3 .3 .2 .4

2.2

1,500 ND 16.6

ND

ND

1,800 7.0

2.2

J17.0

11,9

00 45.4

899 67.2

ND 3.

6 J

1,500 ND 33.2

JND 25.9

46.7 4.6

0.14

9.3

Quantitation

limit

1.

39.

39. 1. 0. 0.

65. 5. 5. 2. 6. 6.

52. 1. 5. 7.

131 5.

131 65. 3. 2. 2. 0. --

3 2 2 3 52 65 3 2 2 6 5 5 2 3 2 8 2 3 9 6 6 13

KAFB250201-1

031138-0002

0.2

Results

ND

6,900 ND 89.8

ND

ND

2,510 8.

02.1

J50.9

10,8

00 39.5

2,390 76.1

ND 6.

7 J

5,500 NDND 23.0

J14

.3

46.6

ND

ND 9.

3

Quantitation

limit

80.

48.

48. 1. 0. 0.

80. 6. 6. 3. 8. 8.

64. 1. 6. 9.

160 6.

160 80. 4. 3. 6. 0. --

2 1 1 6 64 80 2 4 4 2 0 0 2 6 4 6 4 2 8 2 4 16

Tabl

e 3.

Ana

lyti

cal r

esul

ts o

f soi

l sam

ples

fro

m s

ites

23,2

4, a

nd 2

5 C

ontm

ued

Field sample identification:

KAFB250301-1

Batch identification:

0311

38-0

003

Depth (f

eet)

:

0.2

Method number and analysis

Action le

vel

Results

E300.0

Fluoride

SW6010 Aluminum

Barium

Beryllium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Nickel

Potassium

Tin

Vanadium

Zinc

SW7471 Mercury

SW7841 Thallium

SW9045

pH (p

H unit

s)

4.2

10,100

5,600

186

0.16

0.35

J

9,300

400

18.7 3.7

J17

215,100 271

4,450

400

115

1,60

0 15.1

9,52

0 ND 17.3

24,000

192

24

0.15

J

6.4

ND 9.

1

Qu ant i tat ion

limit

1.

55. 1. 0

92. 7. 7. 3. 9. 9. 73. 1.

11.

184 92 5. 3. 0. 3. --

.8 .3 .8 .74

.2 .4 .4 .7 .2 .2 .7 .8 .1 .2 .5 .7 .18

.7

KAFB250401-1

031138-0004

0.2

Results

4.3

6,650

109ND

14,100 10.5

2.1

J96

.310,700

237

3,630 92.0 9.8

J6,460ND 14.9

147 0.

31

ND 9.

2

Quant it at ion

limit

1.

55. 1. 0.

93. 7. 7. 3. 9. 9.

74. 1.

11.

186 93. 5. 3. 0. 7. --

.9 .9 .9 .75

.2 .5 .5 ,7 .3 .3 .6 ,9 .2 .2 .6 .7 .19

.5

KAFB250501-1

031199-0025

4.0

to 8.0

Quant it at ion

Results

limit

7.0

6,170

428 0.

39

J88,3002.

5 J

3.3

J2.

0 J

7,050 ND

3,650 92.8 6.2

J71

3 ND 20.4

14.2

ND

ND 8.

5

1.

36. 1. 0.

60. 4. 4. 2. 6. 6.

48. 1. 7.

121 60. 3. 2. 0. 2. --

.2 .3 .2 .48

.5 .8 .8 .4 .0 .0 .4 .2 .3 .5 .6 .4 .12

.4

KAFB250502-1

031199-0024

4.0

to 8.

0

Results

8.6

6,470

256 0.

37

J71

,0003.

6 J

2.7

J1.

5 J

6,850 ND

3,210 87.6 5.4

J75

9ND 19.0

13.9

ND 0.

25

J

8.6

Quant it

at ion

limi

t

1

331 0

564 4 2 5 5

45

1 6113 563 2 0 2 --

.1 .8 .1 .45

.3 .5 .5 .3 .6 .6 .0 .1 .8 .3 .4 .3 .11

.3

Tabl

e 3.

-Ana

lyti

cal r

esul

ts o

f soi

l sam

ples

fro

m s

ites

23,2

4, a

nd 2

5~C

oncl

uded

N>

Field sample id

entification:

Batch id

enti

fica

tion

:Depth (feet) :

Method number and analysis

Action le

vel

SW6010 Aluminum

Barium

5,600

Beryllium

0-16

Calcium

Chromium

400

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

400

Nickel

1,600

Potassium

Vanadium

Zinc

24,000

Field sample id

entification:

Batch identification:

Depth (feet) :

Analysis

Action level

SW6010 Lead

KAFB250601-1

KAFB250602-1

KAFB250701-1

033656-0003

033656-0004

033656-0005

0.2

Quantitation

Results

limit

Resu

lts

5,75

011

6 0.35

36,4

004.6

3.1

5.4

7,48

0ND

5.1

4.2

2,550

103 5.

81,410 18.8

20-3

0.2

0.2

Quantitation

Quantitation

limi

t Results

limi

t

33.4 1-1

J 0.

4555.7

4.5

J 4.

52.2

5.6

J 5.6

6.2

5.1

44.5 1.1

J 6.

711

1 3.3

2.2

KAFB250801-1

KAFB250802-1

KAFB250901-1

033656-0007

033656-0008

033656-0009

0-2

8.0

to 10.0

0.2

Quantitation

Results

limi

t Results

7.2

5.1

ND

Quantitation

Quantitation

limi

t Results

limit

6.1

5.8

5.2

KAFB250702-1

0336

5,6-

0006

8.0

to 10

-0 Quantitation

Results

limit

__ __ __ -- -- __ __ 4.2

J 5.8

__ __ __ __ __

KAFB250902-1

033656-0010

8.0

to 10

.0 Quantitation

Results

limit

ND

5.6

Table 4. Volatile organic compound field screening measurements of soil samples fromsite 26 Manzano fire training area

[Locations shown in figure 6. Units are in parts per million. NM, no measurement; - -, no sample collected at this depth]

Sample depth (feet)

0.2 4-6 9-11

14-16 19-21

Soil sampling location

2601

4.9 23.2 65 81 92

2602

0.0 4.0

43 114 116

2603

0.0 53 77

167 40

2604

0.9 0.8

48 19

2.4

2605

0.0 0.6

47 98

1.4

2606

0.0 2.7 0.3

2607

0.0 1.8

NM

2608

0.0 8.2 1.2

2609

0.0 3.0 2.0

2610

0.0 0.2 0.2

2611

0.0 0.6 0.5

29-31 5439.41 _ 8550-51 - - 0.060-61 - - 0.070-71 -- - 0.0

83 0.0

26

Tab

le 5

. Ana

lyti

cal r

esul

ts o

f soi

l sam

ples

fro

m s

ite 2

6[M

etho

d nu

mbe

rs li

sted

in ta

ble

7. S

ite lo

catio

n sh

own

in fi

gure

6.

Val

ues

in m

illig

ram

s pe

r kilo

gram

(dr

y w

eigh

t).

Igni

tabi

lity

in d

egre

es F

ahre

nhei

t. ,

no

data

; >,

gre

ater

than

; ND

, not

det

ecte

d; J

, est

imat

ed v

alue

, bel

ow q

uant

itatio

n lim

it]Field sa

mple id

enti

fica

tion

: Batch identification:

Depth (feet)

:Method number

and analysis

E418.1

Total petroleum hydrocarbons

SW1010

Ignitability

SW6010

Aluminum

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Molybdenum

Nickel

Potassium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW8240

2-Butanone (M

EK)

2 -Hexanone

Acetone

Ethylbenzene

Methylene chloride

Toluene

Xylenes (total)

SW8270

1,2,

4-Trichlorobenzene

2 -Methylnaphthalene

Fluorene

Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Bis (2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate

SW8310

Benzo (a)

anthracene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Benzo (b) fluoranthene

Chrysene

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

Action

level

--5,600 0.

1640 --

400 -- -- -- --

400

400

1,60

0 -- 24,000

48,000 --

8,00

08,000 93

16,000

16,000

800

3,200 50 0.1

-- --3,200

3,200 -- --

2,400

KAFB260101-1

031199-0003

0.2

Results

35,500

>160

7,470

257 0.

442.0

8,25

0 30.4 7.7

16.7

21,800

1,89

0

4,860

267ND 11.6

2,390 41.8

436 0.

013

ND 0.

15ND 0.

010

ND

ND

ND NDND

ND

ND 5.

6 J

ND 0.

030

0.06

50.074

ND

ND

ND

ND 0.

33

Quantitation

limi

t

1,570 31.5 1.0

0.42

0.52

52.5 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.2

5.2

42.0 1.0

4.2

6.3

105 3.

12.1

J

0.052

0.05

20.052

0.010

J

0.01

6

0.01

60.026

16 16 7.9

10 14 14

0.01

00.

010

0.01

0J

0.10

0.10

0.10

1.0

0.42

0.21

KAFB260102-1

031199-0017

4.0

to 6.0

Resu

lts

5,59

0

>160

12,900 134 0.

65ND

13,300 13

.910

.626.5

26,0007.

2

7,23

045

6 ND 14.8

3,820 50.8

62.0 0.02

10.0030

0.035

ND 0.

0016

0.0044

ND

.

NDNDND

ND

ND 2.

1

NDND 0.

014

ND

ND

ND

ND

NDND

Quantitation

limi

t

324 -- 32.4 1.1

0.43

0.54

54.0 4.3

4.3

2.2

5.4

5.4

43.2 1.1

4.3

6.5

108 3.

22.2

0.011

J

0.01

10.011

0.0022

J

0.00

32

0.00

320.0054

1.6

1.6

0.81

1.0

1.5

1.4

0.01

10.011

0.011

0.11

0.11

0.11

1.1

0.43

0.22

KAFB260103-1

031847-0016

9.0

to 11

.0

KAFB260104-1

031847-0017

14-0

to

16

.0Quantitation

Results

limit

Results

15,2

00

>160

9,260

175 0.ND

32,500

9- 7.27-

19,300 16

.

5,690

328ND 10.

2,380 36-

44.

ND

ND 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 7- 11 1. 1. 2. 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 3.ND

1,

58 4 3 3 0 2 3 6 362

067

012

J

023

J69 0 2 J

9 J

6 J

7 J

18 024

028

14 46 1 96 J

0

620 -- 32.4 1.1

0.43

0.54

54.0 4.3

4.3

2.2

5.4

5.4

43.2 1.1

4.3

6.5

108 3.

22.2

0.11

0.11

0.11

0.022

0.032

0.032

0.05

4

6.5

6.5

3.2

4.1

5.8

5.6

0.011

0.01

10.

011

0.11

0.11

0.11

1-1

0.43

0.22

15,200

>160

8,230 86. 0.

ND

27,1

00

9. 6.24

.17,200 11

.

5,31

027

3 ND 10.

1,93

0 36.

39.

ND

ND ND 0.ND 0. 2. 12 110. 2. 2. 1.

ND 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1.ND

7 52 4 9 1 0 1 1 2 47 34 J

6 90 J

0 J

1 J

8 J

014

017

030

J24 50 57

J

5

Quantitation

limit

661 -- 33.0 1.1

0.44

0.55

55.0 4.4

4.4

2.2

5.5

5.5

44.0 1.1

4.4

6.6

110 3.

32.2

2.2

2.2

2.2

0.44

0.66

1.1

1.1

3.3

3.3

1.7

2.1

3.0

2.9

0.011

0.01

10.

011

0.11

0.11

0.11

1.1

0.44

0.22

Tab

le 5

.-A

naly

tical

resu

lts o

f soi

l sam

ples

fro

m s

ite 2

6~C

ontin

ued

oo

Field sample id

enti

fica

tion

-.

Batch identification:

Depth (feet) :

Method number

and analysis

E418.1

Total petroleum hydrocarbons

SW1010

Ignit ability

SW6010

Aluminum

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Molybdenum

Nickel

Potassium

Sodium

Tin

Vanadium

Zinc

SW8240 Methylene chloride

Xylenes (total

)

SW8270

1,2, 4-Trichlorobenzene

2-Methylnaphthalene

Acenaphthene

Acenaphthylene

Dibenzofuran

Fluorene

Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Bis (2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate

SW8310

Benzo (a) anthracene

Benzo (a) pyrene

Benzo (b)

f luoranthene

Chrysene

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Naphthalene

Phenant hr ene

KAFB260105-1

031847-0018

19.0 to 21.0

Action

level

-- -- --5,600 0.

1640 --

400 -- -- --

400

400

1,600 -- __ --

24,000 93

16,000

800 --

4,800 -- --

3,200 50 0-1

-- --3,200

3,20

0 __

Quan

t it

at ion

Resu

lts

limi

t

23,800

1,

>160

7,680 85.0 0.50

ND

12,300 32

.9 8-4

38.8

18,600 12

.7

6,450

333 9.

49.

72,250 ND 46.8 J

36.2

52.1

ND 8.

6

18 361.

2 J

0-45 J

0.83 J

2.4

J5.

63.

7 J

1.2

J

0.11

0.02

00.

023

0.097

J0.39

1.1

2.5

3.0

570 31.5 1-0

0.42

0.52

52.5 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.2

5.2

42-0 1-0

4.2

6.3

105

105 52.5 3.1

2.1

1.3

2.1

6.3

6.3

6.3

2.5

5.2

3.1

4.0

5.7

5.5

0.010

0.01

00.010

0.10

0.10

0.10

1.0

0.42

KAFB260201-1

031199-0004

0.2 Quant i tat ion

Results

limit

2,56

0

>160

8,650

483 0.

461.9

4,890 51.5 7.1

19.2

21,100

2,57

0

5,530

305ND 10.4

2,71

0 NDND 37.4

544 0.

0078

ND

NDND

NDNDND

ND

NDND 0.

37 J

NDNDND

NDND

ND ND

ND

159 -- 31.8 1.1

0.42

0.53

53.1 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.3

5.3

42.5 1.1

4.2

6.4

106

106 53.1 3.2

2.1

0.00

320.0053

3.2

3.2

3.2

1.3

2.7

1.6

2.0

2.9

2.8

0.011

0.011

0.011

0-11

0-11

0.11

1.1

0.42

KAFB260202-1

031847-0005

4.0

to 6.0

Quantitation

Results

limi

t

1,490

>160

10,800 147 0.

66ND

11,900 11

-8 9.4

30.4

23,500 20

.7

6,70

0481ND 13.2

3,690 67.7

J

ND 43.5

58.9 0.00

14 J

ND NDND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

NDNDNDND

ND ND

ND

61.9

30.9 1.0

0.41

0.52

51.6 4.1

4.1

2.1

5.2

5.2

41-3 1.0

4.1

6.2

103

103 51.6 3.1

2.1

0.00

310.

0052

0.31

0.31

0-31

0.12

0.26

0.15

0.20

0-28

0.27

0.010

0.010

0-01

00.

100.

100.

10

1.0

0.41

KAFB260203-1

0318

47-0

06

9.0

to 11

.0Quantitation

Results

limit

18,8

00

>160

10,4

00 161 0.

69ND

25,7

00

8.1

7.5

31.1

19,1

00 18.7

6,35

0333 ND 11.3

2,56

0

106

JND 35.6

50.8 0.0097

0.04

3

0.81

J

3.2

J0.

48 J

ND

ND 0.

63 J

0.76

J

1.1

J1.

3 J

ND 0.

035

0.042

0.11

0.29

0.53

0.45

J

0.96

1,630 -- 32.6 1-1

0.44

0.54

54.4 4.4

4.4

2.2

5.4

5.4

43.5 1.1

4.4

6.5

109

109 54.4 3.3

2.2

J 0.020

0.03

4

3.3

3.3

3.3

1.3

2.7

1.6

2.1

2.9

2.8

0.011

0.01

10.011

0.11

0.11

0.11

1.1

0.44

Tab

le 5

.-A

naly

tical

resu

lts o

f soi

l sam

ples

fro

m s

ite 2

6-C

onti

nued

ro

Field sa

mple

identification:

Batch identification:

Depth (feet) :

Method number

ana an

alysis

E418.1

Total petroleum hydrocarbons

SW1010

I gni

t ability

SW6010

Aluminum

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Nickel

Potassium

Sodium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW8240

2-Butanone (M

EK)

Acetone

Methylene chlo

ride

Xylenes (total)

SW8270

1,2,4 -T

r ichlorobenzene

2, 6-Dinitrotoluene

2-Methylnaphthalene

Acenaphthene

Fluorene

Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

Bis (2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate

SW8310

Benzo (a) anthracene

Benzo ( a) pyrene

Benzo (b)

f luoranthene

Benzo (g,h,i)pe

ryle

neChrysene

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Naphthalene

Phenant hrene

Action

level

--5,

600 0.

1640 --

400 -- -- -- --

400

1,60

0 -- __24,000

48,000

8,00

0 9316,000 800 --

4,80

03,

200 -- --

2,400 50 --0-

1 -- --

3,200

3,200 --

KAFB2 60

2 04-1

031847-0007

14.0 to 16

.0Quantitation

Results

limit

12,700

>160

7,250

115 0- 0.

18,100 10

. 7.43.

20,900 16.

5,200

263 11.

1,910

104

J

42.

46. 0.

ND

ND 1. 0.

ND 6. 0. 0. 1. 1.ND 0. 0. 0. 0.

ND 0. 0. 0. 1. 2.

50 41 J

,1 5 .2 ,8 ,4 1 ,8 31 J

7 40 J

.4 36 J

,62

J

,5 J

,2 J

,72

J

.27

,035

.042

,12

,42 99 .8 3

1,59

0 31. 1. 0. 0.

53. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

42. 1. 6.

106

106 3. 2. 2. 2. 0. 1. 3. 3. 3. 3. 1. 2. 2. 2. 2. 0. 0. 0. o. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0.

8 1 42 53 0 2 2 1 3 3 4 1 4 2 1 1 1 64 ,1 ,2 2 ,2 2 ,6 .0 ,9 .6 ,8 .011

,011

.011

.011

.11

.11

,11

.1 .42

KAFB

2 60

205-

1 031847-0008

19.0

to 21.0

Quantitation

Results

limit

4,69

0

>160

9,400

111 0.

51ND

19,400 11

.1 8.6

54.0

20,600 41.6

7,360

358 18.7

2,340 ND 43.0

65.7

ND

ND

ND 0.

51 J

ND 0.

11 J

ND

NDND

ND

ND 0.

10 J

0.26

J

ND

ND

ND 0.

035

ND 0.

077

J0.035

JND 0.

23 J

318 31.8 1.1

0.42

0.53

53.0 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.3

5.3

42.4 1.1

6.4

106

106 3.

22.1

1.3

1.3

0.40

0.66

0.32

0.32

0.32

0.32

0.16

0.20

0.29

0.26

0.28

0.01

10.011

0.01

10.011

0.11

0.11

0.11

1.1

0.42

KAFB260301-1

031199-0005

0-2 Quantitation

Results

limi

t

2,430

>160

11,100 176 0.

541.2

4,74

0 13.6 9.2

15.7

27,700

980

7,71

0406 12.7

4,570 ND

49.1

269 0.0028

J0.

012

0.00

18

JND

ND

NDND

NDND

NDNDND

ND

ND

ND

NDNDND

NDND

NDND

157 -- 31.5 1.0

0.42

0.52

52.5 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.2

5.2

42.0 1-0

6.3

105

105 3.

12.

1

0.01

00.010

0.0031

0.00

52

3.1

3.1

3.1

3.1

1.6

2.0

2.8

2.6

2.7

0.01

00.

010

0.010

0.010

0.10

0.10

0.10

1.0

0.42

KAFB260302-1

031847-0009

4.0

to 6.0

Quantitation

Resu

lts

limit

16,6

00

>160

10,2

00 146 0.

620.32 J

12,5

00 12.8 9.1

20.4

23,700

140

5,900

429 18.7

3,240

117 45.2

70.4

ND 0.

19 J

ND 0.

43 J

ND

ND 2.

90.

20 J

0.38

J

0.49

J

0.78

J

ND 1.

9

0.16

0.024

0.036

ND 0.

070

J

0.28

0.43

0.17

J

1.2

1,59

0 -- 31.8 1.1

0.42

0.53

53.0 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.3

5.3

42.4 1-1

6.4

106

106 3.

22.

1

1.5

1.5

0.45

0.76

1.6

1.6

1.6

1.6

0.80

1.0

1.4

1.3

1.4

0.01

10.011

0.011

0.011

0.11

0.11

0.11

1.1

0.42

Tabl

e 5.

-Ana

lytic

al re

sults

of s

oil s

ampl

es fr

om s

ite 2

6-C

ontin

ued

Field sample identification-.

Batch identification:

Depth (feet) :

Method number

and analysis

E418.1

Total petroleum hydrocarbons

SW1010

Ignitability

SW6010

Aluminum

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Nickel

Potassium

Sodium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW8240

2-Butanone (M

EK)

Ethylbenzene

Methylene chloride

Toluene

Xylenes (total)

SW8270

2-Methylnaphthalene

Acenaphthene

Acenaphthylene

Dibenzofuran

Fluorene

Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate

SW8310

Benzo (a) anthracene

Benzo ( a

) pyrene

Benzo (b) flu

oran

then

eFluoranthene

Fluorene

Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Action

level

-- 245,

600 0.

16--

400 -- -- -- -- __

400

1,600 -- -- __

24,000

48,000

8,000 93

16,000

16,000 --

4,800 -- --

3,200 -_ -- 50 --0.1

--3,200

3,200 --

KAFB260303-1

031847-0012

9.0

to 11

.0 Quant it at

ion

Results

limi

t

18,000

>160

10,500

ND

155 0.

6619,800 11

.4 8.0

34.2

22,700 13

.2

5,86

0342 10.8

2,38

0 25.9

J

43.2

50.7

ND NDND

ND 2-

8

220.95 J

0.41 J

ND 1.

8

3-2

2.9

J0.

76 J

0-19

0.03

20.

031

0.42

1-5

2-2

3.1

1,610 -- 32.2

32.2 1.1

0.43

53-6 4.3

4.3

2.1

5.4

5.4

42.9 1-1

6.4

107

107 3.

22.1

3.6

0.71

1-1

1.8

1.8

3.2

3-2

1.3

2.7

1.6

2.0

2.9

2.8

0.01

10.011

0.01

10.

110.

11

1.1

0.43

KAFB260304-1

031847-0013

14.0

to 16.0

Quant it at

ion

Resu

lts

limi

t

18,000

1,

>160

68106.

3 J

125 0.

4818,100 10

.05.9

25.2

14,100 26.4

4,89

022

6 10.9

1,350

119 29.5

38.0 1.3

JNDND

ND 4.

6

571.4

J0.

49 J

0.86 J

2.2

103.5

0.79

J

ND 0.

023

0.023

0.39

1.7

5.2

2.9

610 -- 32.2

32.2 1.1

0.43

53.7 4.3

4.3

2.1

5.4

5.4

43.0 1.1

6.4

107

107 3.

22.1

7.2

1-4

2.1

3.6

3.6

3.2

3-2

1.3

2.7

1.6

2.0

2.9

2.8

0.01

10.

011

0.01

10.

110.

11

1-1

0.43

KAFB260305-1

031847-0014

14.0

to 16

.0

Quantitation

Results

limit

16,500

1

>160

8,140ND

176 0.

5230,0

00 10.7

7.7

61.1

17,9

00 13.5

6,18

030

5 11.1

1,90

0 ND 36.2

53.9

ND 1-

1 J

1.6 J

0.64

J

6.3

391-

1 J

0.38 J

0.76

J

1.8

6.1

2.8

J0.92 J

0.14

0.22

0.02

10.38

1.5

5.7

3.25

,630 32.6

32.6 1.1

0.44

54.4 4.4

4.4

2.2

5.4

5.4

43.5 1.1

6.5

109

109 3.

32.2

5.4

1.1

1.6

2.7

2.7

3.3

3.3

1.3

2.7

1.6

2.1

2.9

2.8

0.01

10.

011

0.011

0.11

0.11

1.1

0.44

KAFB260306-1

031847-0015

19.0

to 21

.0

Quantitation

Resu

lts

limi

t

3,28

0

>160

8,11

0ND 70.5 0.50

6,490 8.

78.

757

.718

,800 11

-0

6,29

033

3 11.0

2,020

220 34.5

59.7

NDND 0.

027 J

ND 0.

039

J

4.2

0.2

JNDND 0.

35 J

0.45

J

0.52 J

ND

ND

ND

ND 0.

057 J

0.18

0.25

J

0.44

158 -- 31-5

31.5 1.1

0.42

52.5 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.3

5.3

42.0 1.1

6.3

105

105 3.

22.

1

0.11

0.021

0.03

2

0.032

0.053

1-6

1.6

0.63

1-3

0.79

1-0

1.4

1-4

0.011

0.01

10.011

0.11

0.11

1.1

0.42

Tabl

e 5.

Ana

lytic

al re

sults

of s

oil s

ampl

es fr

om s

ite 2

6 C

ontin

ued

Field sample identification:

Batch id

enti

fica

tion

: Depth (fee

t):

Method number

and analysis

E418.1

Total petroleum hydrocarbons

SW1010

Ignitability

SW6010

Aluminum

Barium

Beryllium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Nickel

Potassium

Sodium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW8240

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (M

IBK)

Acetone

Methylene chloride

Xylenes (total)

SW8270

2-Methylnaphthalene

Fluorene

Phenanthrene

Bis (2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate

Action

level - --

5,600 0.

16--

400 -- -- -- --

400

1,600 -- --

24,0

00 --

8,000 93

16,0

00 --

3,20

0 -- 50

KAFB260307-1

031905-0015

29.0

to 31

.0Quantitation

Results

limit

222

>160

8,260 66.7 0.48

7,000 12.7 7.8

37.1

19,5002.7

6,290

350 12.3

2,58

0 ND 35.1

50.7 0.0046 J

ND 0.

0013 J

0.0039 J

NDNDND 0.

085

J

30.8

30.8 1.0

0.41

51.3 4.1

4.1

2.1

5.1

0.0

41-0 1.0

6.2

103

103 3.

12.1

0.01

00.

010

0.00

310.0051

0.31

0.15

0.28

0.27

KAFB260308-1

031905-0016

39.0 to 41.0

Quantitation

Results

limi

t

2,03

0

>160

10,300 89

.1 0.59

12,100 26

.9 9.0

27.4

25,100 46

.86,890

399

128

2,61

0

153 48.9

60/3

ND 0.

0066 J

0.0015 J

ND 0.

560.

065

J0.

087

J0.

24 J

157 31.5 1.0

0.42

52.5 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.2

5.2

42.0 1.0

6.3

105

105 3.

12.1

0.010

0.010

0.00

310.0052

0.31

0.16

0.28

0.27

KAFB260309-1

032342-0003

50.0

to 51.0

Quantitation

Results

limi

t

ND

>160

6,32

0 66.5 0.33

J

6,55

0 7.9

6.6

14.1

15,600 .7

.25,

220

310 8.

21,

790 ND 28.2

42.2

NDND

NDND

NDNDND

ND

30.5

30.5 1.0

0.41

50.8

4.1

4.1

2.0

5.1

5.1

40.7 1.0

6.1

102

305 3.

12.0

0.010

0.010

0.0030

0.00

51

0.31

0.15

0.27

0.27

KAFB260310-1

032342-0004

60.0

to

61

.0Quantitation

Results

limi

t

ND

>160

7,020 61.1 0.36

J

9,570 7.

9

6.9

13.9

14,6006.1

5,88

0

324 9.

72,

180 ND 26.5

42.2

NDND 0.

0092

ND NDNDNDND

30.8

30.8 1.0

0.41

51.4 4.1

4.1

2.1

5.1

5.1

41.1 1.0

6.2

103

308 3.

12.1

0.010

0.010

0.0031

0.0051

0.31

0.15

0.28

0.27

Tab

le 5

. Ana

lyti

cal r

esul

ts o

f soi

l sam

ples

fro

m s

ite 2

6 C

onti

nued

ro

Field sample id

enti

fica

tion

: Batch identification:

Depth (f

eet)

:Method number

and

analysis

E418.1

Total petroleum hydrocarbons

SW1010

Ignitability

SW6010

Aluminum

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Nickel

Potassium

Sodium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW7740

Selenium

SW8240

2-Butanone (M

EK)

Acetone

Methylene chloride

SW8270

Bis

( 2-Ethylhexyl ) phthalate

SW8310

Benzo ( a

) pyrene

Benzo (b) f

luoranthene

Chrysene

Fluor ant hene

Action

level -- -- --

5,60

0 0.16

40 --

400 -- -- -- -- --

400

1,600 -- -- --

24,000 400

48,000

8,00

0 93 50

0.1

-- --

3,20

0

KAFB260311-1

032342-0005

60.0 to

61

.0Quantitation

Results

limit

ND

>160

8,33

0 79.7 0.44

ND

12,200

9.6

8.1

17.1

18,7006.

8

7,10

039

4 10.7

2,95

0 ND 33.5

51.5

ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

NDND

ND

30.8

-- 30.8 1.0

0.41

0.51

51.4 4.1

4.1

2.1

5.1

5.1

41.1 1.0

6.2

103

308 3.

12.1

0.51

0.010

0.010

0.0031

0.27

0.010

0.010

0.10

0.10

KAFB260312-1

032342-0006

70.0 to 71.0

Quantitation

Resu

lts

limi

t

ND

>160

7,65

0 74.2 0.44

ND

12,000

9.7

6.9

13.8

15,2

007.

2

5,85

0305 10.0

2,11

0 ND 29.1

41-2

ND ND ND 0.

0022 J

ND

NDND ND

ND

31.

-- 31. 1. 0. 0.

52. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

42. 1. 6.

106

317 3. 2. 0. 0. 0, 0 0 0 0. 0 0

.7 .7 .1 .42

.53

.8 .2 .2 .1 .3 .3 .2 .1 .3 .2 .1 .53

.011

.011

.0032

.27

.011

.011

.11

.11

KAFB260313-1

0323

42-0

007

83 Quantitation

Resu

lts

limi

t

ND

>160

9,28

013

4 0.47

0.32

J

11,8

00

9.9

6.9

26.1

14,9

006.5

4,270

328 10.2

2,070 ND 27.6

40.7

ND ND ND 0.

0016 J

ND

ND NDND

ND

31.6

-- 31.6 1.1

0.42

0.53

52.6 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.3

5.3

42.1 1.1

6.3

105

316 3.

22.

1

0.53

0.011

0.011

0.0032

0.27

0.011

0.011

0.11

0.11

KAFB260401-1

031199-0006

0.2

Results

61,5

00

>160

13,400 213 0, 8.

6,650 17.

12.

20.

30,2

001,

610

8,470

426 15.

4,95

0126 58.

594 0. 0. 0. 0. 6, 0 0, 0. 0

Quant i t at i on

limi

t

3,42

0 -- 34. 1.

.64

0..0

0.

57.

.5

4..3

4..9

2. 5. 5.

45. 1.

.9

6.11

4114

.8

3. 2.

.5 J

1.

.009

1 J

0..0

75

0,.0

11

0.

.3 J

15

.021

0,

.046

0

.15

0..0

86 J

0,

.2 .1 .46

.57

.0 .6 .6 .3 .7 .7 .6 .1 .8 .4 .3 .1 .011

.011

.003

4

.011

-Oil

.11

.11

Tab

le 5

.-A

naly

tica

l res

ults

of s

oil s

ampl

es f

rom

site

26~

Con

tinue

d

Field sa

mple id

enti

fica

tion

: Batch id

enti

fica

tion

: Depth (f

eet):

KAFB260402-1

031905-0003

4.0

to 6.0

KAFB260403-1

031905-0004

9.0

to 11.0

KAFB260404-1

0319

05-0

005

14.0

to

16

.0

KAFB260405-1

031905-0006

14.0 to 16

.0Method number

and analysis

Action

level

Results

Quantitation

limit

Results

Quantitation

limit

Results

Quantitation

limi

tResults

Quantitation

limi

t

CO

CO

E418.1

Total petroleum hydrocarbons

SW1010Ignitability

SW6010

Aluminum

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Nickel

Potassium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW8240

2-Butanone (M

EK)

2-Hexanone

Acetone

Ethylbenzene

Methylene chloride

Tetrachloroethene

Xylenes (t

otal)

SW8270

2-Methylnaphthalene

Acenaphthene

Fluorene

Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate

SW8310

Chrysene

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

792

>160

31.4

21,200

>160

1,62

02,

000

>160

156

1,430

>160

159

__5,

600 0.

1640

400 -- __ __ -- __

400

1,600 __

24,000

48,0

00 __8,

000

8,000 93

800

16,000

4,80

03,

200 __ -- 50

3,20

03,

200 --

7,160 75.2 0.51

ND

5,05

0 8.7

7.2

23.4

18,0007.1

4,020

274 8.

5

1,870 32.8

36.1 0.0029 J

ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND

NDND

ND NDND NDNDND NDND

31.4 1.0

0.42

0.52

52.4 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.2

5.2

41.9 1.0

6.3

105 3.

12.

1

0.010

0.010

0.01

00.

0021

0.00

31

0.0021

0.0052

0.31

0.13

0.16

0.20

0.28

0.27

0.10

0.10

0.10

1.0

0.42

10,100

154 0.

60ND

19,000 12

.7 7.4

34.3

18,5005.9

5,120

324 10.8

2,22

0 33.4

44.0

NDNDND 0.

017

J0.

014

J

0.01

9 J

0.08

1

180.92 J

1.4

J

2.0

J2.

2 J

ND 0.

0621 J

0.18

50.

574

0.595

J1.38

32.4 1.1

0.43

0.54 .0

4.3

4.3

2.2

5.4

5.4

43.2 1.1

6.5

108 3.

22.

2

0.11

0.11

0.11

0.022

0.032

0.022

0.054

6.5

6.5

3.2

4.1

5.8

5.6

0.11

0.11

0.11

1.1

0.43

9,32

010

3 0.57

0.35

J

9,90

0 14.6 9.4

45.3

28,6

00 76.3

6,000

370 12.9

2,17

0 56.7

51.6

ND 0.

0019 J

ND ND0.

0013

J

ND 0.

0013

J

ND ND ND ND

ND 0.

17 J

ND

ND ND ND ND

31.2 1.0

0.42

0.52

52.1 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.2

5.2

41.7 1.0

6.2

104 3.

12.1

0.010

0.010

0.010

0.0021

0.00

31

0.00

210.

0052

0.31

0.31

0.16

0.20

0.28

0.27

0.10

0.10

0.10

1.0

0.42

8,09

0 93.9 0.50

ND

11,300 13.8 7.8

34.5

21,700 30.2

5,13

0291 12.5

1,96

0 41.0

43.7

ND

ND ND

ND 0.

0018 J

NDND

NDNDND NDND 0.

13 J

NDND ND

ND

ND

31.8 1.1

0.42

0.53

53.0 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.3

5.3

42.4 1.1

6.4

106 3.

22.1

0.011

0.011

0.011

0.00

210.

0032

0.0021

0.00

53

0.32

0.32

0.16

0.20

0.29

0.28

0.11

0.11

0.11

1.1

0.42

Tab

le 5

.-A

naly

tica

l res

ults

of s

oil s

ampl

es fr

om s

ite 2

6-C

onti

nued

OJ

Field samp

le identification:

Batch identification:

Depth (fee

t) :

Method number

and an

alys

isE418.1

Total petroleum hydrocarbons

SW1010

Ignit ability

SW6010

Aluminum

Barium

Beryl 1 iu

mCadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Nickel

Potassium

Sodium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW7740

Selenium

SW8240

2-Hexanone

Acetone

E t hy Ibenzene

Methylene chloride

Tet rachloroethene

Toluene

Xylenes (total)

SW8270

1, 2,4-Trichlorobenzene

2,4-Dinitrophenol

Benzoic ac

idPentachlorophenol

Bis

( 2-Ethylhexyl ) phthalate

Action

level

--5,

600 0.

1640 --

400 -- -- -- -- __

400

1,60

0 -- -- __24,000

400 --

8,000

8,00

0 93800

16,000

16,000 800

160

32,000 5.

850

KAFB260406-1

031905-0007

19.0

to 21.0

Quantitation

Results

limi

t

3,74

0

>160

8,34

0 88. 0.

ND

13,700 10

. 6.53.

16,900 10

.

5,91

0318 10.

2,270 ND

-.32

.48.

ND ND

ND 0. 0. 0, 0. 0. 0.ND

NDND 0.

.3 .46

,4 .6 .8 .0 .7 .4 .6 .0015

J.0025

J.0

013

J

.0014

J.0031

J

.81

J

.23

J

162 32. 1. 0. 0.

54. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

43. 1. 6

108

108 3. 2, 0. 0, 0. 0. 0 0. 0 0. 1. 613 4. 1,

.4 .1 .43

.54

.0 .3 .3 .2 .4 .4 .2 .1 .5 .2 .2 .54

.011

.011

.0022

.003

2.0

022

.003

2.0054

.3 .9 .3 .1

KAFB260501-1

031199-0007

0.2

Quantitation

Results

limit

5,970

>160

6,48

0194 0.

451.

13,630 i')

- 05.6

13.1

15,500

1,53

0

4,260

230 9.

61,

860 ND 30.5

201 0.

39 J

NDND ND 0.

0051

ND

NDND

ND 0.

68 J

6.7 J

0.87

J

ND

317 31.7 1.1

0.42

0.53

52.8 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.3

5.3

42.3 1.1

6.3

106

106 3.

22.1

1.1

0.011

0.011

0.00

210.0032

0.0021

0.0032

0.00

53

3.2

17 32 112.7

KAFB

2 60

5 02

-1

031199-0008

0.2 Quantitation

Results

limit

7,240

>160

4,72

020

5 0.32

J

0.68

3,300 14.6

4.3

10.7

12,600

1,430

2,94

0155 8.

41,11

0 ND 26.3

133 0.

51 J

ND 0.

016

ND 0.

0074

ND

NDND

NDND

NDND 5.

5 J

317 31.7 1.1

0.42

0.53

52.8 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.3

5.3

42.2 1.1

6.3

106

106 3.

22.1

1.1

0.011

0.011

0.00

210.0032

0.0021

0.0032

0.0053

16 8416

0 53 14

KAFB260503-1

031905-0008

4.0

to 6.0

Quant i t at i on

Resu

lts

limit

1,120

>160

7,280 79.4 0.55

0.42

J

6,200 9.

68.

040

.218,600 15

-2

4,13

032

1 8.9

2,21

0173 34.5

43.4

ND 0.

0018

ND 0.

0011

0.0021

0.0011

0.00

170.0020

0.79

J

ND ND

ND 0.

26 J

61 301 0 0

51

4 4 2 5 5

411 6

103

103 3 2 0

J

0 0J

0J

0J

0

J

0J

0 1 612 4 1

.6 -8 .0 .41

.51

.4 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .0 .2 .1 .1 .51

.010

.010

.002

1.0

031

.002

1

.003

1.0

051

.2 .6 .1 .1

SW8310

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

ND

0.01

1ND

0.011

0.015

0.011

ND

0.01

0

Tab

le 5

. Ana

lyti

cal r

esul

ts o

f soi

l sam

ples

from

site

26

Con

tinu

ed

CO en

Field samp

le identification:

Batch identification:

Depth (f

eet) :

Method number

and an

alysis

E418.1

Total petroleum hydrocarbons

SW1010

Ignitability

SW6010

Aluminum

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Nickel

Potassium

Sodium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW8240

Ethylbenzene

Te t r achl oroet hene

Toluene

Xylenes (total

)

SW8270

2 -Methylnaphthalene

Acenaphthene

Fluorene

Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Bi s (2 -E

thyl

hexy

l ) phthalate

SW8310

Benzo (a) anthracene

Benz o ( a

) pyrene

Benzo (b)

f luoranthene

Benzo (g,

h, i)perylene

Chrysene

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Naphthalene

Phenanthrene

Action

leve

l

-- -_5,

600 0.

1640 --

400 -- -- -- --

400

1,60

0 -- -- 24,000

8,000

800

16,000

16,000

4,80

03,200 -- 50 0.

1-- --

3,20

03,200 -- --

KAFB260504-1

031905-0009

9.0

to 11.0

Quan

t it at io

n Results

limit

19,500

>160

9,64

0177 0.ND

31,500 9. 7.

27.

18,500 12

.

5,80

035

1 10.

2,970 ND 35.

45.

ND

ND

ND 1. 8.ND 1. 1. 2. 0. 0. 0. 0.ND 0. 0. 0. 0. 2.

58 2 1 4 .1 1 0 3 5 6 6 J

4 J

8 J

91 J

219

0315

0329

106 J

369

963

696

J07

1,59

0 -- 31.8 1.1

0.42

0.53

53.0 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.3

5.3

42.4 1.1

6.4

106

106 3.

22.1

0.42

0.64

1.1

1.1

6.4

6.4

3.2

4.0

5.7

5.5

0.01

10.

011

0.01

10.

011

0.11

0.11

0.11

1.1

0.42

KAFB260505-1

031905-0010

9.0

to 11

.0Qu

ant it at ion

Results

limit

24,500

>160

9,360

156 0.

59ND

34,700 10.4 6.7

30.3

18,300 16.6

5,34

0298 9.

72,

340

133 35.2

41.0

0.22

J

ND

ND 2.

0

7.9

0.98

J

1.5 J

1.2

J2.6 J

0.84 J

0.23

70.0339

0.0342

0.0180

0.150

0.40

51.06

0.772

J2.

40

1,610 -- 32.2 1.1

0.43

0.54

53.7 4.3

4.3

2.1

5.4

5.4

42.9 1.1

6.4

107

107 3.

22.

1

0.43

0.64

1.1

1.1

6.4

6.4

3.2

4-1

5.8

5.6

0.011

0.01

10.

011

0.011

0.11

0.11

0.11

1.1

0.43

KAFB260506-1

031905-0011

12.0 to 15.0

Quantitation

Results

limit

33,600

>160

6,390 99. 0.

ND

25,800 11. 4.

29.

13,400 36

.

3,960

182 11.

1,54

0 ND 27.

34.

NDND

NDND 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.ND

NDND

ND 0. 0. 0. 0.

0 50 3 6 9 5 5 7 0 3 ,25

J34

J

36 J

,67 J

,28

J

.064

,12

32 ,21

J,7

1

1,61

0 -- 32.2 1.1

0.43

0.54

53-7 4-3

4-3

2-1

5.4

5.4

42.9 1.1

6.4

107

107 3.

22.1

0.43

0.64

1.1

1.1

1.6

1.6

0.81

1.0

1.4

1.4

0.011

0.01

10.

011

0.011

0.11

0.11

0.11

1.1

0.43

KAFB260507-1

031905-0012

19.0 to 21.0

Quantitation

Results

limit

252

>160

9,55

0 86.6 0.55

0.43

J

9,710 13.3 9.3

69.9

21,6007.

6

7,360

444 12.9

3,130

115 40.1

72.8

0.00

14 J

0.00

13 J

0.02

00.

0034

J

NDND

ND

ND

ND 0.

102

J

ND

ND

NDND

ND

NDNDND

ND

30.8

-- 30.8 1.0

0.41

0.51

51.4 4.1

4.1

2.1

5.1

5.1

41.1 1.0

6.2

103

103 3.

12.

1

0.0021

0.00

210.0031

0.00

51

0.31

0.31

0.15

0.20

0.28

0.27

0.010

0.01

00.

010

0.010

0.10

0.10

0.10

1.0

0.41

Tabl

e 5.

--A

naly

tical

resu

lts o

f soi

l sam

ples

from

site

26-

Con

tinue

d

ON

Field

samp

le id

enti

fica

tion

: Batch identification:

Depth (f

eet)

:Method number

and

anal

ysis

E418

.1

Tota

l petroleum hydrocarbons

SW1010

Ignitabil ity

SW6010

Aluminum

Barium

Beryl li

umCadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Nickel

Potassium

Sodium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW8240Acetone

Methylene chloride

Toluene

Xylenes (tot

al)

SW8270

Butyl

benzyl phthalate

Di-n-butyl phthalate

Bis (2

-Eth

ylhexyl) phthalate

Action

leve

l

--

5,600 0.

1640

400

400

1,600 --

24,000

8,000 93

16,000

16,0

00

16,0

008,

000 50

KAFB260601-1

031199-0011

0.2 Quantitation

Results

limi

t

159

>160

8,690

108 0.

50ND

5,90

0 10.1 7.9

16.0

20,000

279

5,520

372 11.1

2,59

0 ND 36.9

139 ND

NDND

ND

ND

ND 0.

12 J

31,

31. 1, 0. 0.

52. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

42. 1. 6.

106

106 3. 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.

.7 .7 ,1 .42

.53

.9 .2 .2 .1 .3 .3 .3 .1 .3 .2 .1 .011

.003

2.0

032

.005

3

.31

.32

.27

KAFB260602-1

031847-0003

4.0

to 6.0

Quantitation

Resu

lts

limi

t

ND

>160

11,100 133 0.ND

18,600

9. 9.28.

22,800 10

.

6,840

443 12.

3,500 38.

42.

57.

ND 0.NDND 0. 0.

ND

.66

.9 .4 .2 .3 .6 .0 J

.9 ,7 .0013

J

.25

J.10 J

31.4

31.4 1.0

0.42

0.52

52.4 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.2

5.2

41-9 1.0

6.3

105

105 3.

12.1

0.010

0.0031

0.0031

0.0052

0.30

0.31

0.27

KAPB260603-1

031847-0004

9.0

to 11

.0Quantitation

Results

limit

ND

>160

8,370

125 0,ND

37,200

7 6.44

.16,400 10

.

7,21

0317 10.

2,46

0 44.

30.

54.

ND 0.ND

ND ND

ND 0.

.52

.2 .6 .7 .2 .9 .2 J

.5 .3 .00121 J

.087

J

30.

30. 1. 0. 0.

51. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

41. 1. 6.

103

103 3. 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.

.9

,9 .0 .41

.51

.5 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .2 .0 .2 .1 .1 .010

.003

1.0

031

.005

1

.30

.31

.27

KAFB260701-1

031199-0012

0.2 Quantitation

Results

limit

2,480

>160

11,000 420 0. 0.

5,970 13.

10.

16.

28,000

1,550

7,330

457 13.

3,810 ND 51.

558 0. 0. 0. 0.

NDND 1.

54 52 6 2 9 4 9 0058 J

0035

0070

0056

4

156

31.1 1.0

0.41

0.52

51.9 4.1

4.1

2.1

5.2

5.2

41.5 1.0

6.2

104

104 3.

12.1

0.01

00.0031

0.0031

0.0052

1.5

1.6

1.3

Tab

le 5

.~ A

naly

tical

resu

lts o

f soi

l sam

ples

from

site

26

Con

tinu

ed

Field sample identification:

Batch identification:

Depth (fee

t) :

Method number

and

analysis

Act i on

level

E418.1

Tota

l petroleum hydrocarbons

SW1010

Ignitability

SW6010

Aluminum

Barium

Beryllium

Ckdmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Nickel

Potassium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW7841

Thallium

SW8240

Acetone

Methylene chloride

--5,600 0.

1640 --

400 -- -- -- -- --

400

1,600 __

24,0

00

6.4

8,000 93

KAFB260702-1

031771-0006

4.0

to 6.0

Quantitation

Results

limi

t

ND

>160

8,870 99. 0.

ND

14,300 6. 7.24

.16,500 4.

5,400

351 9.

2,710 30.

45.

ND

ND 0.

2 58 7 3 7 9 J

5 9 8 0012

J

30.

30. 1. 0. 0.

51. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

41. 1. 6.

103 3. 2. 1. 0. 0.

.8 .8 .0 .41

.51

.3 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .0 .2 .1 .1 .0 .010

.003

1

KAFB260703-1

031771-0007

9.0

to 11.0

Quantitation

Results

limi

t

ND

>160

7,960

117 0.ND

29,600 7. 6.

38.

15,7006.

5,81

0323 11.

1,98

0 28.

48. 0.

ND 0.

56 0 5 0 1 4 8 6 23 J

0024

J

31.

31. 1. 0. 0. 51. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

41. 1. 6.

103 3. 2. 1. 0. 0.

0 .0 .0 .41

,52

,7 .1 .1 .1 ,2 ,2 .3 ,0 ,2 ,1 .1 .0 .010

.003

1

KAFB260801-1

0311

99-0

013

0.2 Quantitation

Results

limi

t

1,10

0

>160

12,7

00 275 0.

680.

728,520 13.8

11.6

19.1

25,200

915

8,78

056

6 15.9

4,31

0 44.7

292 ND 0.

013

0.00

18 J

62.

31. 1. 0. 0. 51. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

41. 1. 6.

104 3. 2. 2. 0. 0.

.3 .1 .0 .42

.52

.9 ,2 .2 .1 .2 .2 .5 .0 .2 .1 .1 .1 .010

.003

1

KAFB260802-1

031771-0010

4.0

to 6.

0Quantitation

Results

limi

t

ND

>160

1,60

011

4 0.ND

14,4

00

8. 9.40.

19,7007.

7,180

461 13.

3,84

0 36.

62. 0.

ND 0.

70 9 0 1 2 5 4 5 21 J

0062

30 301 0 0 51 4 4 2 5 5

411 6

103 3 2 1 0 0

.9 .9 .0 .41

.52

.5 .1 .1 .1 .2 .2 .2 .0 .2 .1 .1 .0 .010

.0031

SW

8270

Bis

(2-E

thylh

exyl)

phth

ala

te5

0N

D0

.27

ND

0.2

70.2

J

0.2

7N

D0

.27

Tabl

e 5.

~ Ana

lytic

al re

sults

of s

oil s

ampl

es fr

om s

ite 2

6 C

ontin

ued

00

Field sample id

enti

fica

tion

: Batch identification:

Depth

( fee

t )

:Method number

and analysis

E418.1

Total petroleum hydrocarbons

SW1010

Ignitability

SW6010

Aluminum

Barium

Beryllium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Nickel

Potassium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW8240

2-Butanone (MEK)

Acetone

Methylene chloride

Toluene

Xylenes (tot

al)

SW8270

Di-n-octyl phthalate

Bi s (

2 -Ethyl

hexy

l ) phthalate

: KAFB260803-1

031771-0011

9-0

to 11.0

Action

level

-- -- 5,600 0.

16--

400 __ -- -- --

400

1,600

24,000

48,000

8,000 93

16,0

0016,000 -- 50

Quantitation

Results

limi

t

ND

>160

9,09

0109 0.

577,420 9-

0

8.2

50.8

18,600 36

.86,710

401 16.5

2,62

0 31.2

66.6

NDND 0.0059

NDND

ND 0.

096

J

31 -- 311 0

514 4 2 5 5

41

1 610

4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

.1 .1 .0 .41

.8 .1 .1 .1 .2 .2 .4 .0 .2 .1 .1 .010

.010

.0031

.003

1.0

052

.25

.27

KAFB260901-1

031199-0014

0.2Quantitation

Results

limit

2,480

>160

6,23

0154 0.

33 J

3,76

0 5.5

5.2

9.5

13,000 760

4,17

0

269 6.

82,170 22.3

163 0.

0031 J

0.014

ND

NDND 0.

12 J

0.26

J

154 -- 30. 1. 0.

51. 4. 4. 2, 5. 5.

41. 1. 6.

103 3. 2 0. 0, 0, 0, 0 0, 0

.8 .0 .41

.3 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .0 .0 .2 .1 .1 .010

.010

.003

1.0

031

.005

1

.25

.27

KAFB260902-1

0317

71-0

012

4.0

to 6.0

Quantitation

Results

limi

t

ND

>160

8,000

106 0.

6011

,0006.8

6.8

27.0

14,1005.7

5,190

349 9.

93,130 26.3

43.7

NDND 0.

0068

0.0020 J

0.0016 J

NDND

31.

31. 1. 0.

52. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

41. 1. 6.

104 3. 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.

2 2 0 ,42

1 .2 .2 .1 ,2 .2 ,7 .0 .2 .1 .1 .010

.010

.003

1.0

031

.005

2

.25

.27

KAFB

2 60 903-1

031771-0013

4.0

to 6.

0Quantitation

Results

limi

t

138

>160

9,230

131 0.

6112,0008.1

8.2

28.6

17,6

006.

55,810

400 11.2

3,640 33.0

48.7

ND

ND 0.

0043

ND ND

ND 0.

086

J

31.0

31.0 1.0

0.41

51.7 4.1

4.1

2-1

5.2

5.2

41.4 1.0

6.2

103 3.

12.1

0.010

0.010

0.0031

0.00

310.

0052

0.25

0.27

Tab

le 5

.~ A

naly

tical

resu

lts o

f soi

l sam

ples

from

site

26~

Con

tinue

d

OJ

Field sample id

enti

fica

tion

: Batch id

enti

fica

tion

: Depth (fee

t):

Method number

and analysis

E418.1 Total petroleum hy

droc

arbo

ns

SW1010

Ignitability

SW6010

Aluminum

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Molybdenum

Nickel

Potassium

Sodium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW7841 Thallium

SW8240

Acetone

Methylene chloride

Xylenes (total)

SW8270 Di-n-octyl phthalate

Bis

( 2 -Ethylh

exyl

) phthalate

Action

leve

l

--5,600 0.

1640 --

400 -- --

400

400

1,600 --

24,000 6.

4

8,000 93

16,000 -- 50

KAFB260904-1

031771-0014

9.0

to 11

.0Qu

ant it

at ion

Results

limit

ND

>160

7,87

0125 0.

530.47 J

17,600 11

.4 7.0

48.6

15,400 62

.5

5,36

032

6 ND

122

2,03

0 ND 27.3

58.7

ND

ND 0.

0066

ND ND 0.

30

31.2

31.2 1.0

0.42

0.52

51.9 4.2

4.2

2.1

5.2

5.2

41.5 1.0

4.2

6-2

104

104 3.

12.

1

1.0

0.010

0.0031

0.00

52

0.25

0.27

KAFB261001-1

031199-0015

0.2 Quant it at

ion

Re

sult

s li

mit

122

>160

12,400

158 0.

600.

34 J

7,260 13.6

11.1

19.8

26,800

158

7,770

510 ND 15.8

3,920

ND 50.0

97.9

ND 0.

0088 J

NDND 0.

065

J0.

077

J

30.

-- 30. 1. 0. 0.

51. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

41. 1. 4. 6.

103

103 3. 2. 2. 0. 0, 0. 0 0

.8 ,8 ,0 ,41

.51

.4 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .0 .1 .2 .1 .1 .1 .010

.003

1.0

051

.25

.27

KAFB261002-1

0317

71-0

004

4.0

to 6.

0Qu

ant it

at ion

Results

limi

t

ND

>160

8,66

0126 0.

58ND

22,300

8.0

7.6

47.9

15,3007.

1

5,970

356 ND 11.5

2,70

0 ND 29.4

54.2 0.22

J

ND 0.

0012

J

ND NDND

31.

-- 31. 1. 0. 0.

51. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

41. 1. 4. 6.

104

104 3. 2. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.

1 1 0 41 52 8 1 1 1 2 2 4 0 1 2 1 1 0 010

0031

0052

25 27

KAFB261003-1

0317

71-0

005

9.0

to 11

.0Quantitation

Results

limi

t

ND

>160

8,10

0 80.9 0-61

ND

6,42

0 10.9 6.8

81.9

18,1007.0

4,77

031

0 ND 11.1

2,170 67.0

J

33.4

59.8

ND 0.

0091

J

0.00

14 J

0.00

13 J

ND

ND

30.9

-- 30.9 1.0

0.41

0.51

51.5 4.1

4.1

2.1

5.1

5.1

41.2 1.0

4.1

6.2

103

103 3.

12.

1

1.0

0.010

0.00

310.

0051

0.25

0.27

SW8310

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

0.010

0.01

50.

010

ND

0.01

0ND

0.010

Tab

le 5

. Ana

lyti

cal r

esul

ts o

f soi

l sam

ples

from

site

26

Con

clud

ed

Field samp

le identification

Batch identification:

Depth (f

eet)

:Method number

and

analys

isE418.1

Total petroleum hydrocarbons

SW1010

Ignitability

SW6010

Aluminum

Arsenic

Barium

Beryllium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Molybdenum

Nickel

Potassium

Silver

Sodium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW8240

Acetone

Methylene chloride

Xylenes (tot

al)

SW8270

Di-n-octyl phthalate

Bis

( 2 -Et

hylh

exyl) phthalate

: KAFB261101-1

031199-0016

0.2

Action

leve

l

-- -- 245,

600 0.

16--

400 -- -- -- -- __

400

400

1,60

0 --

0.05

24

,000

8,00

0 9316

,000 -- 50

Quan

t it

at io

n Results

limi

t

121

>160

11,200 ND

100 0.

5912,100 12

.610.4

15.9

27,500 235

7,420

470 ND 13.3

3,750 NDND 51.6

375 ND ND

ND

ND

ND

30.

-- 30.

30. 1. 0.

51. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

40. 1. 4. 6.

102 4.

102 3, 2, 0. 0. 0 0 0

.7 .7 .7 .0 .41

.1 .1 .1 .0 .1 .1 .9 .0 .1 .1 .1 .1 .0 .010

.0031

.0051

.25

.27

KAFB261102-1

031694-0006

4.0

to 6.0

Results

103

>160

8,79

0 ND 980

14,300

8 859

18,5007

6,14

042

1 ND 13

2,650 NDND 33 63

0 0 0 0 0

.2 .59

._4

.1 .6 .7 .1 .0 .4 .005

7.0014

.0045

.42

.76

Quantitation

limit

31.

-- 31.

31. 1. 0.

51. 4. 4. 2. 5. 5.

41. 1. 4. 6.

104 4.

104 3. 2.

J 0.

J 0.

J 0. 0. 0,

,2 ,2 .2 ,0 ,42

,9 ,2 .2 .1 .2 ,2 .5 .0 .2 .2 .2 .1 .1 .010

.0031

.005

2

.25

.27

KAFB261103-1

0317

71-0

003

9-0

to 11

.0Qu

ant i t

at i on

Results

limit

ND

>160

6,71

0 ND

113 0.

5345,900 5.

84.

889

.810,5004.2

J

5,19

020

2 ND 18.1

1,73

0 NDND 19-5

56-6 0.00

59 J

0.0013 J

0.0016 J

ND 0.

56

31 -- 31 311 0

52

4 4 2 5 5

411 4 6

104 4

104 3 2 0 0 0 0 0

.3 .3 .3 .0 .42

.2 .2 .2 .1 .2 .2 .8 .0 .2 .3 .2 .1 .1 .010

.003

1.0052

.25

.27

Tab

le 6

.~A

naly

tical

res

ults

of s

oil s

ampl

es f

rom

site

27

[Met

hod

num

bers

list

ed in

tabl

e 7.

Site

loca

tion

show

n in

figu

re 7

. V

alue

s in

mill

igra

ms

per

kilo

gram

(dr

y w

eigh

t) u

nles

s ot

herw

ise

indi

cate

d. ,

no d

ata;

J, e

stim

ated

val

ue, b

elow

qua

ntita

tion

limit;

ND

, not

det

ecte

d]

Field samp

le id

enti

fica

tion

: KAFB270101-1

Batch identification:

Depth (f

eet) :

Method number

and analysis

SW6010

Aluminum

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Nickel

Potassium

Sodium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW8240

1,1,1 -Trichloroethane

1, 2-Dichloropropane

Acetone

Methylene chloride

SW9045

pH

(pH

unit

s)

031609-0003

6.5

to

Action

leve

l Results

7,810

5,60

0 128

0.16

0.52

40

ND

26,000

400

6.4

5.9

6.2

14,3005.2

J

5,67

0400

289

1,60

0 8.

61,470

245

29.4

24,0

00

36.6

ND 0.

00342

8,000

0.00573

93

0.00

197

9.3

10.5

Quantitation

limit

32.5 1.1

0.43

0.54

54.2 4.3

4.3

2.2

5.4

5.4

43.4 1-1

6.5

108

108 3.3

2.2

0.0033

0.0033

J 0.

011

J 0.

0033

--

KAFB270102-1

031609-0004

11.5

to

14.5

Resu

lts

5,59

017

4 0.44

ND

38,500

6.5

4.3

9.6

11,300 4.

0 J

4,020

210 80.3

1,200

ND 24.4

29.0

ND ND

ND 0.

00251

8.9

Quantitation

limi

t

32.1 1.1

0.43

0.53

53.4 4.3

4.3

2.1

5.3

5.3

42.8 1.1

6.4

107

107 3.2

2.1

0.0032

0.0032

0.011

J 0.0032

--

KAFB270201-1

0316

09-0

005

7.0

to

Results

11,2

00 156 0.74

0.50

J

56,400

9.2

6.3

7.5

15,3

00 6.1

6,930

255 10.7

1,930

350

33.3

37.5 0.00

101

ND 0.

0051

30.

0024

1

9.1

11.0

Quantitation

limi

t

33.7 1.1

0.45

0.56

56.2 4.5

4.5

2.2

5.6

5.6

45.0 1.1

6.7

112

112 3.4

2.2

J 0.0034

0.0034

J 0.011

J 0.0034

--

KAFB270202-1

031609-0006

12.5 to

18.5

Quan

t i t at

ion

Results

6,610

185 0.

44 J

ND

19,200

6.4

4.3

J8.3

12,000 4.

0 J

3,240

152 6.

2 J

1,480

112

J

22.1

23.9

ND

ND 0.

0039

60.

0022

6

9.1

limi

t 33.8 1.1

0.45

0.56

56.4 4.5

4.5

2.3

5.6

5.6

45.1 1.1

6.8

113 113 3.4

2.3

0.00

340.

0034

J 0.011

J 0.

0034

--

ro

^Tab

le 6

. Ana

lyti

cal r

esul

ts o

f so

il sa

mpl

es f

rom

site

27~

Con

tinue

d

Field sample id

enti

fica

tion

: KAFB270301-1

Batch id

enti

fica

tion

: 031609-0007

Depth (f

eet)

: 8.0

to 12.3

Method number

and

analysis

SW6010

Aluminum

Barium

Beryllium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Nickel

Potassium

Sodium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW8240

1,1, 1-Trichloroethane

Acetone

Methylene chloride

Action

Quantitation

leve

l Re

sult

s li

mit

9,08

05,600

66.8

0-16

0.51

45,700

400

8.1

5.5

8.6

13,6006.

16,

470

400

287

1,600

9.6

1,60

0

ND

'33,4

24,000

34.8 0.00

129

J8,000

ND

93

0.00

197

J

33.4 1.1

0.45

55.6 4.5

4.5

2.2

5.6

5.6

44.5

1-1

6.7

111

111 3.

32.

2

0.0033

0.011

0.0033

KAFB270302-1

031609-0008

13.0

to 17

.0

Quantitation

Resu

lts

limi

t

6,65

011

2 0.40 J

21,7005.8

3.8

J5.9

11,1

00' 5.0

J3,400

170 6.

71,370

169 20.4

23.7 0.00

143

JND 0.00

188

J

32.3 1.1

0.43

53.8 4.3

4.3

2.2

5.4

5.4

43.0 1.1

6.5

108

108 3.

22.2

0.0032

0.01

10.

0032

KAFB270401-1

031609-0017

7.0

to 13.0

Quantitation

Resu

lts

limit

5,88

0101 0.

42 J

18,0

006.3

4.2

J16.6

10,9

00 ND

4,050

229 7.

31,

230

188 21.8

28.9

ND

ND 0.00

176

J

33.0 1.1

0.44

55.0

4.4

4.4

2.2

5.5

5.5

44.0 1.1

6.6

110

110 3.

32.

2

0.0033

0.01

10.0033

KAFB270402-1

0316

09-0

018

13.0

to

17.0

Quantitation

Resu

lts

limit

6,54

0 53.0 0.42

J

25,5006.

9

4.5

8.1

11,3005.6

3,57

0

176 8.

31,

420

330 20.5

25.1

ND 0.

0054

9 J

0.00107

J

32.9 1.1

0.44

54.8 4.4

4.4

2.2

5.5

5.5

43.8 1-1

6.6

110

110 3.

32.2

0.00

330.011

0.00

33

SW8270

bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate

SW9045

pH (pH

units)

50ND

0.29

ND

0.28

ND

0.29

9.1

9.1

9.2

0.14

3

9.0

0.28

Tab

le 6

. Ana

lyti

cal r

esul

ts o

f soi

l sam

ples

fro

m s

ite 2

7 C

oncl

uded

Field sample identification:

KAFB270501-1

Batch iden

tifi

cati

on:

031694-0003

Depth (f

eet)

: 6.0

to 12.0

Method number

and analysis

SW6010

Aluminum

Barium

Beryllium

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

Lead

Magnesium

Manganese

Nickel

Potassium

Silver

Sodium

Vanadium

Zinc

SW8240

Acetone

Methylene chloride

SW9045

pH

(pH

units)

Action

Quant i tat ion

leve

l Re

sult

s li

mit

5,75

05,600

42.7

0.16

0.84

40

ND

47,900

400

4.8

4.1

J17.5

10,600 ND

5,21

040

0 15

41,

600

6.7

1,130

0.05

ND

ND 29.8

24,000

25.0

8,000

0.0179

J93

0.00313

J

8.4

32 1. 0. 0.

.1 1 43 5353.5

4. 4. 2. 5.

3 3 1 35.

3

42. 1. 6.

107 4.

107 3. 2. 0. 0.

-

8 1 4 .3 2 1 027

0080

-

KAFB270502-1

031694-0004

6.0

to 12.0

Quant it at

ion

Resu

lts

limi

t

6,23

056

.1 0.49

0.50

J

45,200 4.

1 J

4.2

J9.5

10,700 4.

0 J

5,730

185 7.

51,260 ND

ND 29.0

27.6 0.00

675

J0.00185 J

8.4

32 1. 0. 0. 53 4. 4. 2. 5. 5. 42. 1. 6.

107 4

107 3. 2. 0, 0.

.1 ,1 .43

,54

.5 .3 3 ,1 .4 4 .8 .1 .4 .3 .2 .1 .011

.003

2

--

KAFB270503-1

031694-0005

13.0

to 15.0

Quant i tat

ion

Resu

lts

limit

8,870

156 0.

610.

38 J

55,3

00 7.0

7.2

10.1

13,2

00 ND

7,530

321 60.3

1,980 ND

ND 31.1

38.0

ND 0.01

49

8.0

34 1. 0. 0. 56 4. 4. 2. 5. 5. 45. 1. 6.

113 4

113 3. 2. 0. 0.

.0 1 45 57 .7 5 5 3 7 7 4 1 8 .5 4 3 028

0085

-

Table 7.~Volatile organic compounds detected in 12 trip blank samples

[Concentrations are in micrograms per liter; J, estimated value, below quantitation limit]

ConstituentConcentration Low High

Number of reported detections

Number of reported detections above quantitation limit

Acetone 6.4 J 15 Methylene chloride 1.2J 3.1

Table 8. Analytes detected in 15 equipment blank samples

0, estimated value, below quantitation limit; mg/L, milligrams per liter; ug/L, micrograms per liter; --, no data]

Constituent (units)

Number of Number Number of reportedConcentration blanks analyzed of reported detections aboveLow High for compound detections quantitation limit

Aluminum (mg/L)Barium (mg/L)Calcium (mg/L)Copper (mg/L)Iron (mg/L)

Lead (mg/L)Manganese (mg/L)Mercury (mg/L)Nickel (mg/L)Sodium (mg/L)

Zinc (mg/L)

0.058 J0.0012 J0.14 J0.0068 J0.052

0.41 J0.0021 J0.00012 J-0.90 J

0.011 J

0.095 J0.0063 J0.810.0300.19

0.055 J0.081 J0.00014 J0.023 J3.4

0.038

1515151515

1515151515

15

23

1225

23218

6

00115

00007

3Total petroleum

hydrocarbons (mg/L) 1.0 Acetone (|Xg/L) 4.2 J 12 Methylene chloride (|Xg/L) 1.0 J 1.4 J

Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate (lig/L)_______2.1 J 16.7

111212

11

44

Table 9.--Analytical results of duplicate samples

0, estimated value, below quantitation limit; >, greater than; NC, not calculated. Method numbers listed in table 7. Analytes measured in milligrams per kilogram

unless otherwise indicated]

Environmental sample KAFB220102-2 Duplicate sample KAFB2201Q3-2

Property or constituent

Environmental sample

Duplicate sample

Relativepercent

difference

Silver (sediment) 412,000 241,000 52.37

Environmental sample KAFB250501-1 Duplicate sample KAFB250502-1

Property or constituent

AluminumBariumBeryllium CalciumChromium

CobaltCopper FluorideIronMagnesium

Manganese NickelPotassiumVanadiumZincpH (pH units)

Environmental sample

6,170428

0.39 J 88,300

2.5 J

3.3 J2.0 J 5.8

7,0503,650

92.8 6.2 J

71320.414.28.5

Duplicate sample

6,470256

0.37 J 71,000

3.6 J

2.7 J1.5 J 7.6

6,8503,210

87.6 5.4 J

75919.013.98.6

Relative percent

difference

4.7550.29

5.26 21.7236.07

20.0028.57 26.87

2.8812.83

5.76 13.796.257.112.141.17

45

Table 9. Analytical results of duplicate samples Continued

Environmental sample KAFB260304-1 Duplicate sample KAFB260305-1

Property or constituent

2-MethylnaphthaleneAcenaphtheneAcenaphthyleneAluminumBarium

Benzo(a)pyreneBenzo(b)fluorantheneBerylliumCalciumChromium

CobaltCopperDibenzofuranFluorantheneFluorene, by method SW8270

Fluorene, by method SW8310Igni lability (degrees Fahrenheit)IronLeadMagnesium

ManganeseNaphthalene, by method SW8270Naphthalene, by method SW8310NickelPhenanthrene, by method SW8270

Phenanthrene, by method SW8310PotassiumTotal petroleum hydrocarbonsVanadiumXylenes (total)

ZincBis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate

Environmental sample

571-4 J0.49 J

6,810125

0.0230.0230.48

18,10010.0

5.925.2

0.86 J0.392.2

1.7>160

14,10026.4

4,890

226105.2

10.93.5

2.91,350

18,00029.54.6

38.00.79 J

Duplicate sample

391.1 J0.38 J

8,140176

0.02050.01900.52

30,00010.7

7.761.10.76 J0.3461.8

1.5>160

17,900135

6,180

3056.15.7

11.12.8 J

3.251,900

16,50036.2

6.3

53.90.92 J

Relative percent

difference

37.5024.0025.2917.7933.89

11.4919.058.00

49.486.76

26.4783.2012.3511.9620.00

12.50NC

23.7564.6623.31

29.7648.45

9.171.82

22.22

11.3833.85

8.7020.4031.19

34.6015.21

46

Table 9.~Analytical results of duplicate samples Continued

Environmental sample KAFB260310-1 Duplicate sample KAFB260311-1

Property or constituent

AluminumBariumBeryllium CalciumChromiumCobaltCopper Ignitability (degrees

Fahrenheit)IronLeadMagnesium Manganese NickelPotassiumVanadiumZinc

Environmental sample

7,02061.1

0.36 J 9,570

7.96.9

13.9

>16014,600

6.15,880

324 9.7

2,18026.542.2

Duplicate sample

8,33079.70.44

12,2009.68.1

17.1

>16018,700

6.87,100

394 10.7

2,95033.551.5

Relativepercent

difference

17.0726.4220.00 24.1619.4316.0020.65

NC24.6210.8518.80 19.50 9.80

30.0223.3319.85

Environmental sample KAFB260404-1 Duplicate sample KAFB260405-1

Property or constituent

AluminumBariumBeryllium CalciumChromiumCobaltCopper Ignitability (degrees

Fahrenheit)IronLeadMagnesium Manganese Methylene chloride NickelPotassiumTotal petroleum

hydrocarbons VanadiumZincBis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate

Environmental sample

9,320103

0.57 9,900

14.69.4

45.3

>16028,600

76.36,000

370 0.0013 J

12.92,170

2,000 56.751.6

0.17 J

Duplicate sample

8,09093.9

0.50 11,300

13.87.8

34.5

>16021,700

30.25,130

291 0.0018 J

12.51,960

1,430 41.043.7

0.13 J

Relativepercent

difference

14.139.24

13.08 13.215.63

18.6027.07

NC27.4486.5715.63 23.90 32.26

3.1510.17

33.24 32.1416.5826.67

47

Table 9. Analytical results of duplicate samples Continued

Environmental sample KAFB260501-1 Duplicate sample KAFB260502-1

Property or constituent

AluminumBariumBeryllium CadmiumCalcium

ChromiumCobaltCopper Ignitability (degrees Fahrenheit) Iron

LeadMagnesium Manganese Methylene chloride Nickel

PotassiumSeleniumTotal petroleum hydrocarbons VanadiumZinc

Environmental sample

6,480194

0.45 1.1

3,630

20.05.6

13.1 >160

15,500

1,5304,260

230 0.0051 9.6

1,8600.39 J

5,970 30.5

201

Duplicate sample

4,720205

0.32 J 0.68

3,300

14.64.3

10.7 >160

12,600

1,4302,940

155 0.0074 8.4

1,1100.51 J

7,240 26.3

133

Relative percent

difference

31.43551

33.77 47.19952

31.2126.2620.17

NC 20.64

6.7636.67 38.96 36.80 13.33

50.5126.6719.23 14.7940.72

48

Table 9.-Analytical results of duplicate samples Continued

Environmental sample KAFB260504-1 Duplicate sample KAFB260505-1

Property or constituent

2-Methylnaphthalene AluminumBariumBenzo(a)anthraceneBenzo(a)pyrene

Benzo(b)fluorantheneBeryllium CalciumChromiumChrysene

CobaltCopper FluorantheneFluorene, by method SW8270 Fluorene, by method SW8310

Ignitability (degrees Fahrenheit) IronLeadMagnesium Manganese

Naphthalene, by method SW8270 Naphthalene, by method SW8310 NickelPhenanthrene, by method SW8270 Phenanthrene, by method SW8310

PotassiumTotal petroleum hydrocarbons VanadiumXylenes (total) ZincBis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate

Environmental sample

8.6 9,640

1770.2190.0315

0.03290.58

31,5009.20.106 J

7.127.4 0.3691.6 J 0.963

>160 18,500

12.15,800

351

1.4 J 0.696 J

10.12.8 J 2.07

2,97019,500

35.01.5

45.30.91 J

Duplicate sample

7.9 9,360

1560.2370.0339

0.03420.59

34,70010.40.150

6.730.3

0.4051.5 J 1.06

>160 18,300

16.65,340

298

1.2 J 0.772 J 9.72.6 2.40

2,34024,500

35.22.0

41.00.84 J

Relative percent

difference

8.49 2.95

12.617.897.34

3.871.71 9.67

12.2434.37

5.8010.05 9.306.42 9.59

NC 1.09

31.368.26

16.33

15.39 10.35 4.047.41

14.77

23.7322.73

0.5728.57

9.978.00

49

Table 9. Analytical results of duplicate samples Concluded

Environmental sample KAFB260902-1 Duplicate sample KAFB260903-1

Property orconstituent

AluminumBariumBerylliumCalciumChromium

CobaltCopper

Environmentalsample

8,000106

0.6011,000

6.8

6.827.0

Ignitability (degrees Fahrenheit) >160IronLead

MagnesiumManganeseMethylene chlorideNickelPotassiumVanadiumZinc

14,1005.7

5,190349

0.00689.9

3,13026.343.7

Duplicatesample

9,230131

0.6112,000

8.1

8.228.6

>16017,600

6.5

5,810400

0.004311.2

3,64033.048.7

Relativepercent

difference

14.2821.10

1.658.70

17.45

18.675.76

NC22.0813.11

11.2713.6245.0512.3215.0722.6010.82

Environmental sample KAFB270501-1Duplicate sample KAFB270502-1

Property orconstituent

AcetoneAluminumBariumBerylliumCalcium

ChromiumCobaltCopperIronMagnesium

ManganeseMethylene chlorideNickelPotassiumVanadiumZincpH (pH units)

Environmentalsample

0.0179 J5,750

42.70.84

47,900

4.84.1 J

17.510,6005,210

1540.00313 J6.7

1,13029.825.0

8.4

Duplicatesample

0.00675 J6,230

56.10.49

45,200

4.1 J4.2 J9.5

10,7005,730

1850.00185 J7.5

1,26029.027.6

8.4

Relativepercent

difference

90.478.01

27.1352.635.80

15.732.41

59.260.949.51

18.2951.4111.2710.882.729.890.00

50

Table 10.--Concentration of volatile organic compounds in standards for the gas chromatograph

[Concentrations are in micrograms per liter]

ConcentrationConstituent Low standard High standard

trans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-DichloroetheneBenzeneTrichloroetheneTolueneTetrachloroethenem-Xylene

1.29.63.94.53.88.99.2

4.032.012.915.312.629.730.6

Table 11. Analytical methods and sources

[Method sources: D, American Society for Testing Materials (1984); E, U.S. Environmental ____Protection Agency (1983); SW, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1986)]

Property or constituentMethod source and number Soil Water

Soil moisture contentFluorideTotal petrbleum hydrocarbonsIgnitaoilityICP screen

AntimonyMercurySeleniumSilverThallium

Volatile organic compoundsSemivolatile organic compoundsDioxins and furansPolynuclear aromatic hydrocarbonsSoil pH

D2216E300E418.1SW1010SW6010

SW7041SW7471SW7740SW7761SW7841

SW8240SW8270SW8280SW8310SW9045

Not applicableE300E418.1Not applicableSW6010

SW7041SW7470SW7740SW7761SW7841

SW8240SW8270SW8280SW8310Not applicable

51

Table 12.~Method detection limits and practical quantitation limits[Method numbers listed in table 7. NA, not applicable; mg/kg, milligrams per kilogram; mg/L, milligrams per liter; °F, degrees Fahrenheit; Mg/L, micrograms per liter; Jig/kg, micrograms per

kilogram; ng/L, nannograms per liter]

Method number

ASTM D2216

E300

E418.1

SW1010

SW6010

SW7041

SW7471 (soil)SW7470 (water)

SW7740

SW7761

SW7841

SW8240

Reporting unitProperty or constituent Soil Water

Soil moisture Percent NA

Fluoride mg/kg mg/L

Total petroleum hydrocarbons mg/kg mg/L

Ignitability °F NA

ICP screen: mg/kg mg/L

AluminumArsenicBariumBerylliumCadmium

CalciumChromiumCobaltCopperIron

LeadMagnesiumManganeseMolybdenumNickel

PotassiumSilverSodiumTinVanadium

Zinc

Antimony mg/kg mg/L

Mercury mg/kg mg/L

Selenium mg/kg mg/L

Silver mg/kg mg/L

Thallium mg/kg mg/L

Volatile organic compounds: mg/kg Hg/L

AcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethane2 -But an one

Carbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideChl or obenzeneDibromochloromethane

Method detection

limitSoil

0.1

0.03

14

NA

5.85.70.10.10.3

1110.90.54.8

3.57.80.20.91 .4

1001

17120.6

0.9

1.5

0.05

0.2

0.05

0.2

0.003860.000200.000210.000560.000400.0022

0.000800.000300.000190.00035

Water

NA

0.06

0.9

NA

0.0580.0570.0010.0010.003

0.110.010.0090.0050.048

0.0350.0780.0020.0090 .014

10.010.170.120.006

0.009

0.015

0.0001

0.002

0.0005

0.002

3 .860.200.210.560.402.2

0.800.300.190.35

Practical quantitation

limitSoil

NA

1

30

NA

3030

10.40.5

SO4425

540

146

1004

10050

3

2

2

0.1

0.5

1

0.0150.0010.0010.0020.0020.009

0.0030.0010.0010.001

Water

NA

0.2

1

NA

0.30.30.010.0040.005

0.50.040.040.020.05

0.20.40.010.040.06

50.0410.50.03

0.02

0.02

0.0002

0.005

0.01

1511229

3111

52

Table 12. Method detection limits and practical quantitation limits Continued

Reporting unit

Method detection

limitMethod number Property or constituent Soil Water Soil

SW8240 (continued) Chloroethane mg/kg Hg/L2-Chloroethyl vinyl etherChloroformChloromethane1, 1-Dichloroethane

1 , 2-Dichloroethane1 ,1-Dichloroethenetrans-1 , 2-Dichloroethene1 , 2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene

trans-1 ,3-DichloropropeneEthylbenzene2-HexanoneMethylene chloride4-Methyl-2-pentanone

Styrene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1 -Trichloroethane

1,1, 2-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneVinyl acetateVinyl chlorideXylenes (total )

SW8270 Semivolatile organic mg/kg Hg/Lcompounds :

AcenaphtheneAcenaphthy 1 eneAnthraceneBenzoic acidBenzo (a) anthracene

Benzo (b) f luoranthene

Benzo (k) f luorantheneBenzo(g,h, i JperyleneBenzo ( a ) pyreneBenzyl alcohol

bis ( 2 -Chloroethoxy) methanebis (2-Chloroethyl (etherbis (2-Chloroi sopropyl ) etherbis (2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether

Butyl benzyl phthalate4-Chloroaniline4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether2-ChloronaphthaleneChrysene

Dibenz (a, h) anthraceneDibenzofuranDi-n- butyl phthalate

0-000

00000

00000

00000

00000

000-0

0

0000

00000

00000

000

.00102- 1

.00020

.00058

.00038

.00035

.00059

.00055

.00032

.00070

.00025

.00018

.00123

.00025

.0012

.00019

.00087

.00021

.00033

.00029

.00051

.00025

.00072

.00042

.00070

.074

.031

.048- 1

.021

.067

.099

.093

.075

.080

.061

.040

.028

.065

.063

.072

.075

.052

.068

.029

.105

.063

.088

Water

1-

000

00000

00101

00000

00000

201-

0

2

2222

11011

22120

312

.02- 1

.20

.58

.38

.35

.59

.55

.32

.70

.25

.18

.23

.25

.2

.19

.87

.21

.33

.29

.51

.25

.72

.42

.70

.22

.93

.45- 1

.63

.02

.97

.79

.26

.39

.83

.20

.83

.96

.90

.17

.26

.57

.03

.86

.15

.88

.63

Practical quantitation

limitSoil

0.0.0,0.0.

0.0,0.0.0.

0.0.0.0.0.

0,0.0.0.0.

0.0.0.0.0.

0.0.0.3.0,

0.

0.0.0,0.

0.0.0.0,0,

0.0,0,0.0,

0.0.0,

.004

.022

.001

.002

.002

,001.002.002,001.003

.001

.001

.005

.001

.005

.001

.003

.001

.001

.001

.002

.001

.003

.002

.003

.295

.124

.193

.200

.083

.269

.300

.300

.300

.300

.244

.160

.300

.260

.253

.289

.300

.209

.270

.114

.300

.250

.300

Water

422

122

12213

11515

13111

21323

946

1003

8

1010

910

75

1088

99683

108

10

53

Table 12. Method detection limits and practical quantitation limits Continued

Reporting unitMethod number Property or constituent Soil Water

SW8270 (continued) 1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene mg/kg H9/L1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene

1, 4-Dichlorobenzene3,3 '-DichlorobenzidineDiethyl phthalateDimethyl phthalate2 , 4-Dinitrotoluene

2 , 6-DinitrotolueneDi-n-octyl phthalateFluorantheneFluor eneHexachlorobenzene

HexachlorobutadieneHexachl orocyc 1 opent adi eneHexachloroethaneIndeno(l, 2, 3-c, d) pyreneI sophorone

2-MethylnaphthaleneNaphthalene2-Nitroanil ine3-Nitroaniline4 -Nit roan il ine

NitrobenzeneN -N i t rosodi pheny 1 am ineN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamlnePhenant hr enePyrene

1,2, 4-Trichlorobenzene4-Chloro-3-methylphenol2-Chlorophenol2 , 4-Dichlorophenol2 , 4-Dimethylphenol

4, 6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol2 , 4-Dinitrophenol2 -Methyl phenol4-Methylphenol2-Nitrophenol

4-NitrophenolPentachlorophenolPheno 12,4, 5-Trichlorophenol2,4, 6-Trichlorophenol

SW8280 Dioxins and furans H9/kg ng/L

SW8310 PAH's: mg/kg ng/L

Napht ha 1 eneAcenaphthyleneAcenaphtheneFluorenePhenant hrene

Method detection

limitSoil

00

00000

00000

0-000

00000

00000

00000

00000

00000

2 10

00000

.038

.037

.028

.148

.016

.020

.078

.085

.059

.058

.038

.119

.118- 1

.037

.075

.037

.104

.048

.020

.040

.125

.057

.110

.027

.068

.061

.090

.089

.038

.076

.091

.065

.115

.056

.054

.063

.095

.110

.079

.105

.033

.0054

.0147

.0076

.0070

.0126

Water

11

04002

21113

3-

121

31013

13021

22122

13111

23231

2 10

01001

.14

.10

.85

.44

.48

.59

.35

.55

.77

.74

.14

.58

.54- 1

.11

.26

.13

.12

.43

.59

.20

.74

.72

.31

.82

.03

.85

.71

.67

.15

.29

.72

.94

.45

.69

.61

.90

.86

.29

.38

.16

.00

.45

.23

.63

.58

.05

Practical quantitation

limitSoil

00

.152

.147

0.1140100.

000,00,

0,0000

001,01

00000

00000,

11000

11000

.300

.400

.720

.300

.300

.235

.232

.152

.300

.300

.300

.148

.300

.150

.300

.191

.600

.160

.600

.229

.300

.300

.271

.246

.300

.300

.153

.300

.300

.600

.600

.225

.214

.253

.600

.000

.300

.421

.133

Water

54

10104824

9

10775

10

10-- 1

495

106

505

50

71010

87

1010

59

10

5050

768

50301013

4

182318

26

Anthracene 0.0210 1.75

54

Table 12. Method detection limits and practical quantitation limits-ConcludedMethod

detection Reporting unit limit

Method number

SW8310 (continued)

SW9045

Property or constituent

FluoranthrenePyreneBenzo (a ) anthraceneChrysene

Benzo (b) f luorantheneBenzo (k) f luorantheneBenzo ( a ) py reneDibenzo (a,h) anthraceneBenzo (g,h, i Jperylene

Indenod, 2, 3-cd)pyrene

Soil pH

Soil Water Soil

mg/kg ng/L 0.01170.01970.01240.0126

0.01330.00570.01560.01240.0128

0.0119

pH units NA NA

Water

0.981.641.031.05

1.100.481.301.031.07

0.99

NA

Practical quantitation

limitSoil Water

23

3 1

1.5

3 1

13 13 13 1

3 1

NA NA

Method detection limit is not listed because it is questionable. This isdue to chemical reactions or instability of the analyte during analysis by the specified method, resulting in erratic recoveries during tests to determine the method detection limit.

2Method detection limit per congener as in method SW8280.

3 Practical quantitation limit is questionable if it is less than or equal to the method detection limit.

55 O.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1995-674-110/25023