analysis(of(the(cylindrical(deflector(for(the(tamutrap ... ·...

1
Figure 7.2: Lens voltage 5900V Figure 4: Diagram of the beam line with the electrosta@c deflector in place. Analysis of the Cylindrical Deflector for the TAMUTRAP Facility Robert McAfee*, Mike Mehlman, Dan Melconian, Praveen Shidling Cyclotron Ins,tute, Texas A&M University *REU Student from The University of Texas at El Paso IntroducDon The Texas A&M University Penning Trap (TAMUTRAP) facility (Figure 1) will conduct precision measurements on betadelayed proton decays to probe physics beyond the standard model. The Texas A&M University Reaccelerated Exo@cs (TREX) upgrade project will deliver a low energy radioac@ve beam to the TAMUTRAP facility for measurement. Along the beam path through the TAMUTRAP facility there are three 90° deflec@ons where electrosta@c deflectors will be placed. The overall goal of this project was to test and analyze the cylindrical deflector as a suitable beam transport method for the TAMUTRAP facility. Obtaining The OpDmum Ion Beam Previous aVempts at fabrica@ng a suitable beam were met with many complica@ons which can be seen in figure 5.1. The beam spot produced by the 39 K ion source was several cen@meters in diameter and did not simulate the beam the TAMUTRAP facility would be receiving. To compensate for the large nonsymmetric beam produced a collimator was added to the beam line aZer the ion source. With the collimator the beam gained circular shape and the diameter was greatly reduced. Along the path of the beam to the cylindrical deflector there are several correc@on op@cs (Figure 4) which had to be calibrated. The system of correc@on op@cs produced a symmetric beam spot (Figure 5.2) Figure 5.1 Figure 5.2 The Cylindrical Deflector The cylindrical deflector (Figure 2) was analyzed and tested for the TAMUTRAP facility for its simpler design compared to other deflectors. The draw back of the cylindrical deflector is the field poten@al lines it produces in the transport region are less consistent (Figure 3). The main goal of this analysis was to observe the effects of the cylindrical deflector on a symmetric beam profile to observe the deflectors suitability for use in the TAMUTRAP facility. Figure 1: Diagram of the proposed TAMUTRAP Figure 2: An image of the cylindrical deflector Figure 3: Electric poten@al field lines a) spherical deflector b) cylindrical deflector. Results AZer the deflector was placed in the beam line several images were taken of the beam profile at different deflector plate voltages. The images were then imported into Mathema@ca and analyzed for their brightness values vs. posi@on values. Then a Gaussian was fiVed in red (Figure 6). From the Gaussian fits, beam proper@es such as posi@on and width in the X and Y direc@ons were easily extracted. A graph of the outer plate voltage vs. the corresponding inner plate voltage shows a linearity in deflector plate voltages used to keep the spot in the same area (Figure 7.1). The X and Y widths of several plate voltages were then ploVed with their respec@ve outer plate voltage (Figure 7.2). In Figure 7.2 It was observed that the deflector produced a symmetric beam output within a reasonable voltage range. The analysis was done for several lens voltages with the best results being between 5700V6000V. The main goals of the project were achieved and a symmetric region for the cylindrical deflector was found (Figure 8). The difference in the posi@ons of the beam before the deflector and aZer the deflector were do to lack of precision alignment. The cylindrical deflector was found to be an effec@ve method of beam deflec@on for TAMUTRAP and will be u@lized in the future. An emiVance sta@on was assembled and will be u@lized for future study of the beam proper@es. Conclusion Figure 8: (LeZ) beam going into deflector. (Right) beam coming out of deflector. Figure 6 Figure 7.1: Lens Voltage 5900V 40mm 40mm 3.0mm 3.0mm

Upload: others

Post on 10-Jul-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Analysis(of(the(Cylindrical(Deflector(for(the(TAMUTRAP ... · Figure’7.2:’Lens’voltage’5900V’ Figure’4:’’Diagram’of’the’beam’line’with’ the’electrostac’deflector’in’place.’

Figure  7.2:  Lens  voltage  5900V  

Figure  4:    Diagram  of  the  beam  line  with  the  electrosta@c  deflector  in  place.  

Analysis  of  the  Cylindrical  Deflector  for  the  TAMUTRAP  Facility  Robert  McAfee*,  Mike  Mehlman,  Dan  Melconian,  Praveen  Shidling  

Cyclotron  Ins,tute,  Texas  A&M  University  *REU  Student  from  The  University  of  Texas  at  El  Paso  

 IntroducDon  

The   Texas   A&M   University   Penning   Trap   (TAMUTRAP)   facility  (Figure   1)   will   conduct   precision  measurements   on   beta-­‐delayed  proton  decays   to  probe  physics  beyond   the   standard  model.   The  Texas   A&M   University   Reaccelerated   Exo@cs   (T-­‐REX)   upgrade  project   will   deliver   a   low   energy   radioac@ve   beam   to   the  TAMUTRAP   facility   for   measurement.   Along   the   beam   path  through   the   TAMUTRAP   facility   there   are   three   90°   deflec@ons  where   electrosta@c   deflectors  will   be   placed.   The   overall   goal   of  this  project  was   to   test  and  analyze   the   cylindrical  deflector  as  a  suitable  beam  transport  method  for  the  TAMUTRAP  facility.  

Obtaining  The  OpDmum  Ion  Beam  Previous  aVempts  at  fabrica@ng  a  suitable  beam  were  met  with  many  complica@ons   which   can   be   seen   in   figure   5.1.   The   beam   spot  produced  by   the   39K   ion  source  was  several   cen@meters   in  diameter  and   did   not   simulate   the   beam   the   TAMUTRAP   facility   would   be  receiving.   To   compensate   for   the   large   non-­‐symmetric   beam  produced   a   collimator   was   added   to   the   beam   line   aZer   the   ion  source.  With   the   collimator   the  beam  gained   circular   shape  and   the  diameter   was   greatly   reduced.   Along   the   path   of   the   beam   to   the  cylindrical   deflector   there   are   several   correc@on   op@cs   (Figure   4)  which  had  to  be  calibrated.  The  system  of  correc@on  op@cs  produced  a  symmetric  beam  spot  (Figure  5.2)  

Figure  5.1  

Figure  5.2  

The  Cylindrical  Deflector  The  cylindrical  deflector  (Figure  2)  was  analyzed  and  tested  for  the  TAMUTRAP   facility   for   its     simpler   design   compared   to   other  deflectors.   The   draw   back   of   the   cylindrical   deflector   is   the   field  poten@al   lines   it   produces   in   the   transport   region   are   less  consistent  (Figure  3).  The  main  goal  of  this  analysis  was  to  observe  the   effects   of   the     cylindrical   deflector   on   a   symmetric   beam  profile   to   observe   the   deflectors   suitability   for   use   in   the  TAMUTRAP  facility.    

Figure  1:  Diagram  of  the  proposed  TAMUTRAP  

Figure  2:  An  image  of  the  cylindrical  deflector  

Figure  3:    Electric  poten@al  field  lines  a)  spherical  deflector  b)  cylindrical  deflector.    

Results  AZer  the  deflector  was  placed  in  the  beam  line  several  images  were  taken  of  the  beam  profile  at  different  deflector  plate  voltages.  The  images   were   then   imported   into     Mathema@ca   and   analyzed   for  their   brightness   values   vs.   posi@on   values.   Then   a   Gaussian   was  fiVed  in  red  (Figure  6).  From  the  Gaussian  fits,  beam  proper@es  such  as  posi@on  and  width  in  the  X  and  Y  direc@ons  were  easily  extracted.  A  graph  of  the  outer  plate  voltage  vs.  the  corresponding  inner  plate  voltage  shows  a  linearity  in  deflector  plate  voltages  used  to  keep  the  spot   in   the   same   area   (Figure   7.1).   The   X   and   Y  widths   of   several  plate   voltages  were   then   ploVed  with   their   respec@ve   outer   plate  voltage  (Figure  7.2).  In  Figure  7.2  It  was  observed  that  the  deflector  produced   a   symmetric   beam   output   within   a   reasonable   voltage  range.  The  analysis  was  done  for  several  lens  voltages  with  the  best  results  being  between  5700V-­‐6000V.        

The   main   goals   of   the   project   were   achieved   and   a   symmetric  region   for   the   cylindrical   deflector   was   found   (Figure   8).   The  difference   in   the  posi@ons  of   the  beam  before   the  deflector   and  aZer   the   deflector   were   do   to   lack   of   precision   alignment.   The  cylindrical  deflector  was  found  to  be  an  effec@ve  method  of  beam  deflec@on   for   TAMUTRAP   and   will   be   u@lized   in   the   future.   An  emiVance   sta@on   was   assembled   and   will   be   u@lized   for   future  study  of  the  beam  proper@es.  

Conclusion  

Figure  8:  (LeZ)  beam  going  into  deflector.  (Right)  beam  coming  out  of  deflector.    

Figure  6  

Figure  7.1:  Lens  Voltage  5900V  

40mm  

40mm  

3.0mm   3.0mm