analysis of the influence of driving dynamic parameters on tire marks
DESCRIPTION
Gunther Seipel, Prof. Dr. Hermann Winner, TU Darmstadt Dr. Frank Baumann, Ralf Hermanutz , Daimler AG. Analysis of the Influence of Driving Dynamic Parameters on Tire Marks. Overview. Motivation Objectives and Methodology Model for the Emergence of Tire Marks - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
Analysis of the Influence of Driving Dynamic Parameters on Tire Marks
Gunther Seipel, Prof. Dr. Hermann Winner, TU Darmstadt
Dr. Frank Baumann, Ralf Hermanutz, Daimler AG
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
2
Overview
Motivation
Objectives and Methodology
Model for the Emergence of Tire Marks
Influencing Driving Dynamic Parameters
Experimental Results
Further Steps
Summary and Outlook
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
3
Tire marks are of particular importance to clarify the circumstances leading to an accident
Tire marks are of particular importance to clarify the circumstances leading to an accident
Motivation
Tire Marks in Accident Reconstruction
Tire marks provide evidence regarding
Amount of speed reduction
Trajectory of vehicles
Place of collision
Curving speed
Vehicle defects
…
Pic
ture
s: h
ttp:
//w
ww
.unf
alla
ufna
hme.
info
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
4
Motivation
Changes in Tire Mark Characteristics due to Changes inChanges in Tire Mark Characteristics due to Changes in
Tires Wider Dimensions New Types (e.g. RoF, Low Rolling Resistance)
Tires Wider Dimensions New Types (e.g. RoF, Low Rolling Resistance)
Chassis Control Systems Improvements of ABS New Systems (e.g. ESP) …
Chassis Control Systems Improvements of ABS New Systems (e.g. ESP) …
Chassis Weights Suspension …
Chassis Weights Suspension …
Validity of Application of Conventional Reconstruction MethodsValidity of Application of Conventional Reconstruction Methods
Main Questions
Under which conditions do tire marks occur?
How do driving dynamics parameters influence the visibility of tire marks?
How do different types of tires affect the emergence of tire marks?
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
5
Objectives
TireTire RoadRoad
Tire MarkTire MarkFocus of Research
External ForcesExternal Forces
Tire Speed, Longitudinal and Lateral SlipsTire Speed, Longitudinal and Lateral Slips
Tire ForcesTire Forces Evaluation of the influence of superior processes by analysis of influence of basic driving dynamic parameters
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
6
Methodology
Top-Down Approach
Model of Fundamental Mechanisms for
Emergence of Tire Marks
Model of Fundamental Mechanisms for
Emergence of Tire Marks
Identification of Relevant Driving Dynamic
Parameters
Identification of Relevant Driving Dynamic
Parameters
Experimental Analysis of Parameters on a Mono-
Wheel
Experimental Analysis of Parameters on a Mono-
Wheel
Transfer of Results on Passenger Car
Transfer of Results on Passenger Car
Fzvx
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
7
Model for the Emergence of Tire Marks
General Assumption of Two Main Mechanisms:
Abrasive tire wear due to sliding friction (tire side)
Bleeding of bitumen due to frictional heating (road Side)
Tire PropertiesTire Properties
Road PropertiesRoad Properties
Tire Mark IntensityTire Mark Intensity
γγ
Tire HeatingTire Heating
vv
Road HeatingRoad Heating
Tire Side
Road Sidefor asphalt roads
*WV
*BitumenV
*FE
Friction energy per length is of key significance for the emergence of tire marks!
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
8
Model for the Emergence of Tire Marks
Calculation of Friction Energy per Length
Assumptions:
Friction in the contact patch between tire and road surface occurs only for sliding friction
λ
µ
µmax
0 % 100 %
µslide
µ=cλ ∙λ
µ-λ-curve
deformation slip area
slide slip area
2
2res
c
c
2 2
,
x yresd res
res
µ µµ
c c
2 2 2
2, ,
x y
s res res d res
µ µc
c c
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
9
Model for the Emergence of Tire Marks
Calculation of Friction Energy per Length
Assumptions:
Friction energy per length is the product of the resulting friction force and the resulting friction path per travelled distance
Resulting Friction path between tire and road per travelled distance is equal to the resulting slide slip
2 2 2
* 2 2 2, ,
x y
F F res s res z x y
µ µcE F F µ µ
c c
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
10
Model for the Emergence of Tire Marks
Identification of Relevant Driving Dynamic Parameters
Wheel load, longitudinal slip and slide slip angle determine the amount of friction energy per length
Hypotheses:
1. No tire marks occur for pure deformation slip, i.e.
2. The intensity of a tire mark increases with increasing friction energy per length (under constant boundary conditions)
3. The intensity of a tire mark depends on the amount of friction energy per length independent of the varying parameter
2 2 2
* 2 2 2 x y
F z x y
µ µcE F µ µ
c c
* 0FE
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
11
Experimental Analysis
Testing Tool
Tire Measurement Trailer PETRA (Personen-wagen-Reifen-Traktions-Messanhänger)
Originally built for the µ-slip-analysis of car and light truck tires with varying:
Tire types
Pavement textures and intermediate mediums
Speeds
Wheel loads
Longitudinal and lateral slips
Camber angles
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
12
Tire Measurement Trailer PETRA
Components
Regulator (hidden)
Measurement wheel
Oil cooler
Reference wheel
Hydraulic pump (hidden)
Gearbox (hidden)
Accumulator
Correvit sensor
Hydraulic tankAnalyzer unit
Slip angle adjustment
Experimental Analysis
IR temperature sensor
Measuring rim
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
13
Regulator
Measurement wheel
Gearbox
Cooler
Reference wheel
Hydraulic axial piston pump
Proportional valve
stationary working points
transponed
µ-λ-curve characteristic pump curve
Experimental Analysis
Tire Measurement Trailer PETRA
Functional principle Measurement wheel is linked to
axial piston pump via gearbox
Pump conveys oil against a regulator
Generated pump torque (by measurement wheel) depends on pump speed (=wheel speed via gearbox) and oil delivery volume
Oil delivery volume is adjusted using a proportional valve
Equilibrium of brake and pump torque leads to stationary working points with constant longitudinal slip
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
14
Step Visisbility Characteristic
0 0 % No Mark recognizable
1 10 % Mark incomplete and/or very faint pronounced without supporting mark fragments
2 20 % Mark incomplete, clearly recognizable interval mark parts
3 30 % Mark complete and faint pronounced without supporting mark fragments
4 40 % Mark complete and faint pronounced, edge mark and/or interval mark parts support the recognizability
5 50 % Mark complete and moderate pronounced, edge mark and/or interval mark parts support the recognizability
6 60 % Mark complete, edge mark emphasized to incomplete, filling faint pronounced
7 70 % Mark complete, edge mark clearly emphasized, filling moderate pronounced
8 80 % Mark complete, edge mark clearly emphasized, filling pronounced
9 90 % Mark complete, edge mark not or hardly distinguishable from filling, filling much pronounced
10 100 % Mark complete, edge mark not distinguishable from filling, edge mark and filling very much pronounced
Experimental Analysis
Assessment of Visibility
Subjective assessment of tire mark on a scale from 0 (no mark) to 10 (clearly recognizable)*
*Cf. Grandel, J., 1989
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
15
Experimental Analysis
Testing Ground
Former airfield with asphalt pavement
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
16
Experimental Analysis
Test Procedure
1. Generation of tire mark within a defined area
2. Marking and documentation of tire mark
PETRA
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
17
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0,00 100,00 200,00 300,00 400,00 500,00
Subj
ecti
veV
isib
ility
[%]
Friction Energy [J/m]
ContiEcoContact3 185/65 R 15
Variation λ (2 - 16 %)
Variation Fz (4,8 - 5,8 kN)
Variation α (-6 - 6 °)0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0,00 100,00 200,00 300,00 400,00 500,00
Subj
ecti
ve V
isib
ility
[%
]
Friction Energy [J/m]
Pirelli SOTTOZERO 225/45 R 17 (Winter)
Variation λ (2 - 12 %)
Variation Fz (4,8 - 5,8 kN)
Variation α (-6 - 6 °)
Experimental Analysis
First Results No visible tire marks for pure deformation slip
Tires show increasing intensity with increasing friction energy
The amount of friction energy per intensity and beginning of visibility differs between different tire types
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
18
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0,00 100,00 200,00 300,00 400,00 500,00
Subj
ecti
veV
isib
ility
[%]
Friction Energy [J/m]
ContiEcoContact3 185/65 R 15
Variation λ (2 - 16 %)
Variation Fz (4,8 - 5,8 kN)
Variation α (-6 - 6 °)0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0,00 100,00 200,00 300,00 400,00 500,00
Subj
ecti
ve V
isib
ility
[%
]
Friction Energy [J/m]
Pirelli SOTTOZERO 225/45 R 17 (Winter)
Variation λ (2 - 12 %)
Variation Fz (4,8 - 5,8 kN)
Variation α (-6 - 6 °)
Experimental Analysis
First Results Restrictions:
Large scattering of intensity values mainly due to subjective assessment of visibility and environmental influences (e.g. lighting conditions, angle of view, individual perception)
Tire marks for the same values of λ, α and Fz not always reproducible
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
19
Further Steps
Requirements for Further Investigation
Development of an objective method for the assessment of tire mark intensity, which is robust against environmental influences
Development of a method to determine the “tire marking sensitivity” of different combinations of tire and road surface
Tire PropertiesTire Properties
Road PropertiesRoad Properties
Tire Mark IntensityTire Mark Intensity
γγ
Tire HeatingTire Heating
vv
Road HeatingRoad Heating
Tire Side
Road Sidefor asphalt roads
*WV
*BitumenV
*FE
Tire Marking Sensitivity
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
20
Further Steps
Requirements for Further Investigation
Development of an objective method for the assessment of tire mark intensity, which is robust against environmental influences
Development of a method to determine the “tire marking sensitivity” of different combinations of tire and road surface
Approach: Determination of sensitivity with help of a mobile testing facility for tire tread elements which allows for indoor and outdoor use under very controlled conditions
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
21
Possible Applications
Backward Calculation
Forward Calculation
Intensity of tire mark
(crash scene)
Tire marking sensitivity
Friction energy
Determination with mobile testing facility at crash scene
Calculation of friction energy
Tire marking sensitivity
Output parameters from driving dynamics Simulation
Beginning, intensity, …Visibility of tire
mark
Analysis of Tire Marks | Gunther Seipel | Tire Science and Technology Annual Meeting 2011, Akron | September 13-14, 2011
22
Summary and Outlook
A concrete model was presented showing the key significance of dissipated friction energy per length for the emergence of tire marks
Longitudinal slip, tire slip angle, and wheel load have been identified as relevant driving dynamic parameters, determining the amount of this energy
Experimental results basically agree with the model description
Results additionally show a high influence of tire and road specific properties (tire marking sensitivity) on the intensity, and environmental influences on its assessment
Requirements for further investigation:
Development of an objective and robust method for the assessment of tire mark intensity
Development of a method for the determination of the tire marking sensitivity of different tire/road combinations