analysis of surface cracks in chq grades

17
1 Summer Industrial Training Report-2012 Analysis of longitudinal Surface Discontinuous Cracks in Cold Headed Quality steel grade as-rolled coils at Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Limited, Bhandara Road, Maharashtra 7 th May-6 th July. (Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Summer Internship-2012) Guided by Submitted by Mr Avinash Pansi Piyush Verma General Manager, 09MT3018 Quality Assurance and Customer Services Metallurgical & Materials Engineering Sunflag Iron & Steel Plant IIT, Kharagpur Co-guided by Mr Nitin Raut Manager Quality Assurance and Customer Services Sunflag Iron & Steel Plant

Upload: piyush-verma

Post on 25-Jun-2015

654 views

Category:

Technology


7 download

DESCRIPTION

2012-Summer Internship Project Report

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

1

Summer Industrial Training

Report-2012

Analysis of longitudinal Surface Discontinuous Cracks in Cold

Headed Quality steel grade as-rolled coils

at

Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Limited,

Bhandara Road, Maharashtra

7th May-6th July.

(Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Summer Internship-2012)

Guided by Submitted by

Mr Avinash Pansi Piyush Verma

General Manager, 09MT3018

Quality Assurance and Customer Services Metallurgical & Materials Engineering

Sunflag Iron & Steel Plant IIT, Kharagpur

Co-guided by Mr Nitin Raut Manager

Quality Assurance and Customer Services

Sunflag Iron & Steel Plant

Page 2: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

2

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank my Guide, Mr Avinash Pansi (General Manger) and Co-Guide, Mr Nitin Raut (Manager),

Quality Assurance & Customer Services department, Sunflag Iron & Steel Plant, Bhandara Road) for their immense

support and guidance throughout my Internship at Sunflag. I would specially like to thank Mr Nitin Raut for always

giving time out of his busy schedule, whenever I approached.

I would like to thank Sunflag Steel Plant’s HR Management Department for providing me an opportunity to get

an exposure of working in an industrial environment, the problems related to manufacturing and an opportunity for 2

continuous months to meet the metallurgists working in industry.

I am thankful to Mr Sandeep Nadagouda (Assistant General Manager, Industrial Engineering & Training), for

providing me an opportunity to deliver a short lecture on “Iron-Iron carbide phase diagram” to GETs from non-

metallurgical background on 15th June, which I believe added some value to the Sunflag Organization.

Piyush Verma

28th August, 2012

Page 3: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

3

Contents

Page

1. About the Company 4

2. About the Internship 4

3. Plant Visit 4

4. Following a CHQ Grade production process 6

5. Project 7

6. Analysis 8

7. Final Conclusion 16

8. At the End of Training 17

Page 4: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

4

About the Company

Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Limited is a part of Sunflag Group of Industries. It’s an Integrated Steel

Plant, situated at Bhandara Road, Maharashtra & is in the business of manufacturing special steel and power for

22 years. The plant is located on 2.3 Sq. Km of land. Sunflag Steel has strength of around 2000 people. The

plant has present installed capacity of making 400,000 metric tonnes per year of quality special steels. Sunflag

Steel is the leading producer of Special Carbon, Alloy Steels, Micro Alloy and Stainless steels. Sunflag Steel’s

customers include all major Original Equipment Manufacturers in India, Americas, Europe, South East / Far

East / Middle East Asia.

About the Internship

Observed the steel production process and got an overview of a steel plant, from its Sinter plant, Mini

Blast Furnace, Refining Furnaces to Rolling mills and testing.

Worked on the Analysis of Longitudinal Discontinuous Surface cracks in Cold Headed Quality Steel

grade coils in Bar & Section Mill.

Plant Visit 1. EAF-Electric Arc Furnace-Mannesmann Demag (55 MT)

Continuous feeding of sponge iron

Decarburization & Dephosphorization.

Eccentric Bottom Tapping.

Raw materials:-

Scrap – 6 Tonne

Hot Metal from MBF (Mini Blast Furnace) – 30-32 Tonne

DRI (Direct Reduced Iron)- 28-30 Tonne.

Reactions:-

C+O₂ = CO ₂

Si+O ₂ =SiO ₂

Mn+O ₂ =MnO ₂

P+O ₂ =P ₂ O5

2. LRF-1 Ladle Refining Furnace1 (55 MT)-

Deoxidation and Desulphurization (Continuous Arcing)

Ferro Alloys, Lime etc additions for controlling the chemistry like

FeMn, FeSi, FeCr, FeMo, SiMn, CPC (Coke Calcined Petroleum).

Sulphur is mainly reduced to 100-150 ppm (0.010%-0.015%)

Al+ [O] = Al ₂ O3

Si+ [O] =SiO ₂

Mn+ [O] =MnO ₂

S+ [O] =SO ₂

3. LRF-2 Ladle Refining Furnace2 (55 MT)-

Reheating of the heat if necessary for maintaining the temperature (Continuous Arcing)

Page 5: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

5

4. Vacuum Degassing –Danieli (VD)

To reduce dissolved gases levels like H₂ , N₂, O₂ by creating vacuum (1milliBar)

Addition of wire rods Al (for fixing O₂) Ti (for fixing N₂), CaSi (for modifying the

Al₂O3 inclusion into spherical C₁₂A7 (12CaO.7Al₂O3) and B wire (to achieve Hardenability

in CHQ grades)

CHQ GRADE- 10 min VD holding time at 1mbar

5. Continuous Casting Machine (CCM)

Laddle from VD is put in a turret (can contain at a time 2 laddle containing hot metal), from

which through shroud (made of graphite) liquid metal is poured in a T-type(to avoid

turbulence) tundish (all closed to avoid oxidation of liquid steel), from tundish, steel is

passed through already heated (to avoid thermal shock) SEN( Sub-Entry Nozzle-made of

Zr+Graphite-3 numbers per tundish).

Casting of the liquid steel continuously in 2 X 3 stand billet caster.

Electro Magnetic Stirrer (EMS)(600 mm from the top of the mould which is also 300 mm

from the bottom- total mould length 900 mm) to avoid dendritic structure during

solidification(Avoids macro-segregation of Pb and S).

Hydraulic Mould (Water cooled Copper) Oscillator to avoid sticking (can produce

Oscillation hook marks later in the billets).

Addition of Mould Flux (REDx here) to avoid friction between cast and the mould (can result

in entrapments later in rods).

6. Billet Yard

Hot-Billet is gas-cut and air-cooled, for 2 days, then the Billet-Grinding (must for CHQ

Grades for better surface finish) takes place either manually or in Billet Grinding Machine.

Billet-Grinding done upto 1-3mm depth removes surface oxides.

7. Reheating Furnace

Billet is reheated upto1200˚C (Top Heating), fuel used: gases from MBF.

For 2-3 hrs depending upon the cross-section of the billet (160X160, 130X130, 320X230).

Discharge temperature around 1150˚C.

8. Rolling Mill

From reheating furnace, billets are rolled in either 20 stand WRD (Wire RoD mill)

(For sizes >12mm) or 20+10 stand WRB (Wire Rod Block mill)(for sizes 5.5-12mm).

-Morgardshammer Garret coiler (made of nodular cast iron to avoid friction between drum

and rod) used to coiling the wire rods.

9. Testing and Sampling

In SMS (EAF+LRFs+VD) using lollypop samples (for chemistry).

Billet cross-section chemistry, Shear-cutting at stand-8 of rolling mill and finishing stands.

Front and back ends of each coil goes following testings /observations

MPI (Magnetic Particle Separation method for locating defects if any)

Under Magnifying glass for identifying various surface defects and measuring crack length.

Under Optical Microscope

For differentiating between continuous and discontinuous cracks.

For measuring the decarburization depths near the cracks and concluding

whether crack formed before or during rolling.

For locating any entrapments near cracks.

For identifying the type of inclusion(if any near the cracks)

For measuring the crack depth.

Crack depth (in mm)

Crack length (in mm) 0.1(20mm)

Page 6: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

6

Following a CHQ Grade production process

Heat Number-74101 (15B25) (Continuous Arcing)

EAF Tapping temperature-1630˚C

Additions made:-

-SiMn-600 kg

-Cao (lime)-300 kg.

LRF-1 Starting Temperature-1561˚C (Refractory Lining- MgO -C, Magnesia-Carbon)

Additions made:-

-Al bar – 2 X 22 kg, after 3 minutes of arcing.

-CaO – 100 kg

-SiMn-250 kg

-Fe-Si-36 kg

-CPC (Coke Calcined Petroleum)-50 kg

-Al cored wires-120 meter

-FeCr HC (High Carbon)-50 kg

-Al dros (major content Al₂O3, added to refine the slag, contains SiO₂ too)

-Electrode (Length-2100 mm and diameter-500mm) (Electrode length decreases due to

erosion)

-HC FeMn 120 kg

-HC FeCr 10 kg

-CaO-50 kg

VD (Vacuum Degassing)

P-1 millibar

For CHQ Grade-10 min holding time at 1 millibar

CaSi-strand1-61 m

Al-strand1-64 m

B-strand1-16 m

Ti-strand1-125 m

Laddle In Temperature-1669˚C

Laddle out Temperature-1600˚C

CCM

-EMS 600mm below top surface (300 mm from bottom) of the oscillating mould

(vertically), total length of the mould-900 mm

-REDx added to avoid oxidation of liquid steel in the tundish.

Page 7: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

7

Project

Problem: In Sunflag, significant rejections in coils are coming from CHQ grades, most of which

comprise of Boron CHQ grades (10B21, 15B25, 15B41).

About CHQ grades:

Cold Forged- Mainly for fasteners and similar components.

Starting material-Wire Rods.

Metallurgical specification:-

- Surface defect depth less than 0.5% of wire rod diameter.

- Decarburization depth less than 0.5% of wire rod diameter.

- Cold-upsetting to 85% minimum of wire rod.

Benefits of Cold-Forging:-

- High As-forged strength.

- No trimming and scaling loss.

- Good surface finish (required for automotive components)

Approach: Work in the project mainly included

1st-Data Collection from the Record registers of CHQ grades for discontinuous cracks

between January-May & arranging it.

2nd

-Data Analysis of January-May-To find out which grade among Boron CHQ grades is

most problematic, and further which size(cross-section) and to look if there’s any trend.

3rd

-Identification of the “NOT OK” Heat and observing its cracks under Optical

Microscope (if available i.e. sample not thrown) and to look for any inclusion.)

4th

-Comparison of various processing parameters responsible for inclusion occurrence

of the Good Heats and the Bad Heats.

Samples sent by Sunflag Customer

Micro Turner Rejected Cold Forged

Page 8: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

8

Analysis

January-April

NUMBER O F FRO NTFRO NT BACK BACK TO TAL CO ILS CO ILS %AGE %AGE

SAMPLES O K NO T O K O K NO T O KCO ILS O K NO T O K O K REJECTIO N

CHECKED

1 72665 10B21 5.5 44 22 0 22 0 22 22 0 OK 100 0

3 71590 10B21 6 10 5 0 4 1 5 4 1 80 20

4 71590 10B21 6 10 5 0 4 1 5 4 1 NOT OK 80 20

46 72866 10B21 7 36 18 0 18 0 18 18 0 OK 100 0

49 71806 10B21 8 10 4 1 4 1 5 3 2 NOT OK 60 40

51 71937 10B21 8 50 20 5 20 5 25 17 8 NOT OK 68 32

84 72847 10B21 9 64 0 32 0 32 32 0 32 NOT OK 0 100

85 72847 10B21 9 64 20 12 11 21 32 4 28 NOT OK 12.5 87.5

86 71590 10B21 10 14 7 0 4 3 32 4 3 NOT OK 90.7 9.3

91 72861 10B21 10 56 26 2 24 4 28 22 6 NOT OK 78.57 21.42

92 72860 10B21 12 70 35 0 35 0 35 35 0 OK 100 0

205 72670 15B25 5.5 40 18 2 20 0 20 18 2 NOT OK 90 10

206 71569 15B25 6 6 3 0 3 0 3 3 0 OK 100 0

255 72754 15B25 8 8 3 1 3 1 4 2 2 NOT OK 50 50

256 73338 15B25 8 16 4 4 5 3 8 2 6 NOT OK 25 75

257 73339 15B25 8 46 15 8 5 10 23 9 14 NOT OK 39.14 60.86

258 71597 15B25 9 4 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 OK 100 0

259 71628 15B25 9 4 1 1 2 0 23 1 1 NOT OK 95.66 4.34

260 71664 15B25 9 22 9 2 11 0 2 9 2 NOT OK 0 100

262 71569 15B25 10 16 8 0 3 5 8 3 5 NOT OK 37.5 62.5

369 72863 15B25 16 4 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 OK 100 0

370 72900 15B25 16 16 8 0 8 0 8 8 0 OK 100 0

371 72911 15B25 16 22 8 3 10 1 11 7 4 NOT OK 63.64 36.36

372 71628 15B25 17 4 1 1 2 0 8 1 1 NOT OK 87.5 12.5

373 72900 15B25 17 16 7 1 7 1 8 6 2 NOT OK 75 25

374 72827 15B25 18 30 12 3 13 2 15 12 3 NOT OK 80 20

386 71596 15B41 16 12 0 6 0 6 6 0 6 NOT OK 0 100

387 72214 15B41 16 4 1 1 2 0 2 1 1 NOT OK 50 50

388 72215 15B41 16 6 0 3 0 3 3 0 3 NOT OK 0 100

389 72215 15B41 16 6 3 0 3 0 3 3 0 OK 100 0

390 72215 15B41 16 28 11 3 14 0 14 11 3 NOT OK 78.58 21.42

391 72757 15B41 19 14 7 0 7 0 7 7 0 OK 100 0

406 71776 15B41 24 14 7 0 5 2 7 5 2 NOT OK 71.43 28.57

407 71776 15B41 25 42 12 9 11 10 7 4 3 NOT OK 57.15 42.85

408 73280 15B41 25 40 18 2 15 5 20 13 7 OK 65 35

409 73280 15B41 25 6 0 3 0 3 3 0 3 NOT OK 0 100

410 73279 15B41 26 20 8 2 7 3 10 6 4 NOT OK 60 40

411 73279 15B41 26 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 OK 100 0

REMARKSr

No.

HEAT

NO .

GRAD

E

SIZ

E

(Total Data for January-April includes observation of 411 entries-All not shown)

Page 9: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

9

Population Grade Vs Size Vs Rejection (January-April)

GRADE SIZE Total Coils Coils % Rejection

Coils Checked OK NOT OK

10B21 5.5 70 70 0 0

6 479 446 33 6.88

6.5 40 39 1 2.5

6.7 167 163 4 2.39

7 107 104 3 2.8

8 82 58 24 29.26

13.3 7 5 2 28.57

15 9 6 3 33.33

16 7 7 0 0

16.3 3 3 0 0

17 11 11 0 0

18 4 2 2 50

19 11 11 0 0

20 7 5 2 28.57

21 75 45 30 40

23 22 10 12 54.54

24 79 25 54 68.35

26 30 21 9 30

28.5 84 29 55 65.47

15B25 5.5 87 65 22 25.28

6 80 61 19 23.75

6.7 76 75 1 1.31

8 219 154 65 29.68

9 12 5 7 58.33

10 114 85 29 25.43

11 130 112 18 13.84

12 47 43 4 8.51

13 672 531 141 20.98

14 37 1 36 97.29

15 216 162 54 25

16 26 21 5 19.23

16.3 265 205 60 22.64

17.3 10 7 3 30

18 22 19 3 13.63

18.3 33 27 6 18.18

23 7 3 4 57.14

15B35 18.3 1 0 1 100

15B41 14 7 6 1 14.28

16.3 49 34 15 30.61

19 7 7 0 0

20 48 42 6 12.5

23 47 37 10 21.27

24 24 19 5 20.83

25 20 3 17 85

Page 10: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

10

Population Curves

5.5

6

6.5

6.7

78

8.5

910

1213.3 151616.317 1819 20

21

23

24

26

28.5

5.566.56.77

88.5

9

10 1213.3 15 1616.31718 19 2021

23

24

26

28.5

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Nu

mb

er

of

Co

ils

Size (in mm)

10B21, Coils Checked Vs Rejected

Coils Checked

5.56 6.7

8

9

10 11

12

13

14

15

16

16.3

17.31818.3 235.56 6.78

9 10 11 12

13

14 1516

16.317.31818.3 230

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 5 10 15 20 25

Nu

mb

er

of

Co

ils

Size (in mm)

15B25, Coils Checked Vs RejectedCoils Checked

Coils Not OK

14

16.3

19

20 23

2425

2614

16.3

1920

2324

25

260

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Nu

mb

e o

f C

oils

Size (in mm)

15B41, Coils Checked Vs Rejected

Coils Checked

Coils Not OK

Полиномиальная (Coils Not OK)

Page 11: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

11

Grade-Size-Rejection Trend

5.56 6.56.77

8

8.5

9

1012

13.3 15

1616.317

18

19

2021

23

24

26

28.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

% R

eje

ctio

n

Size (in mm)

10B21 % Coils Rejection

5.56

6.7

8

9

10

1112

13

14

151616.3

17.3

1818.3

23

0102030405060708090

100

0 5 10 15 20 25

% R

eje

ctio

n

Size (in mm)

15B25 % Coils Rejection

14

16.3

19

20

23 24

25

260

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

% R

eje

ctio

n

Size (in mm)

15B41 % Coils Rejection

Higher Rejection Trend in

Cross-section around

23mm

Page 12: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

12

All Grade Vs Size Analysis

May

GRADE SIZE TOTAL COILS COILS REJECTED %REJECTED

10B21 5.5 217 7 3.22

10B21 6 39 18 46.15

10B21 6.5 58 24 41.37

10B21 6.7 45 16 35.55

10B21 8 148 54 36.48

10B21 8.5 160 8 5

10B21 10 145 9 6.2

10B21 12 8 0 0

10B21 13.3 7 2 28.57

10B21 15 15 2 13.33

10B21 18.4 4 0 0

10B21 20 29 8 27.58

10B21 21 11 4 36.36

10B21 23 35 3 8.57

10B21 23.5 35 2 5.71

10B21 24 38 16 42.1

10B21 26 13 7 53.84

10B21 27.5 7 5 71.42

10B21 28.5 52 38 73.07

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

% R

eje

ctio

n

Size (in mm)

Grade-wise Rejection in coils in different sizes

15B25

15B41

Полиномиальная (10B21)

CommonRejection of around 60% for 10B21,15B25,15B4

Higher Rejection in 10B21, 15B25 around size at 9-10 mm

14-15B25

Page 13: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

13

GRADE SIZE TOTAL COILS COILS REJECTED %REJECTED

15B25 5.5 22 3 13.63

15B25 6.7 14 6 42.85

15B25 8 49 35 71.42

15B25 8.5 126 5 3.96

15B25 10 218 3 1.37

15B25 12 179 52 29.05

15B25 20 23 0 0

15B25 21 2 0 0

15B25 23 29 16 55.17

15B41 10 12 2 16.67

15B41 12 14 0 0

15B41 13 108 12 11.11

15B41 14 3 1 33.33

15B41 15 6 1 16.67

15B41 17 36 0 0

15B41 17.3 5 3 60

15B41 20 9 3 33.33

15B41 21 58 3 5.17

15B41 23 48 1 2.08

15B41 24 19 10 52.63

5.5

6 6.5

6.7 8

8.5 1012

13.3

15

18.4

2021

2323.5

24

26

27.528.5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

% R

eje

ctio

n

Size (in mm)

10B21 % Coils Rejection

Again in MAY month, high rejection trend in Higher

Page 14: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

14

5.5

6.7

8

8.5 10

12

13

14

17.318

18.3

20 21

23

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15 20 25

% R

eje

ctio

n

Size (in mm)

15B25 % Coils Rejection

10

12

13

14

15

17

17.3

20

21 23

24

40

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

% R

eje

ctio

n

Size (in mm)

15B41 % Coils Rejection

Page 15: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

15

Observations

Observed, measured and compared the depth of discontinuous surface cracks between samples

from stand 8 and the finishing stand 18th, of grade 10B21 (Heat Number-74313), using

magnifier.

-Crack depth decreased between stands 8th

& 18th

.

Observed the distribution of discontinuous cracks on both the samples under MPI (Magnetic

Particle Inspection).

-Discontinuous cracks formed, along with few continuous cracks, all over the surface

(Not on any specific side).

Observed the surface cracks under Optical Microscope (100x) for the inclusion pattern, by

polishing the sample along the crack.

-Of the few samples which were observed, most of the cracks where regular shaped,

indicating rolling problem.

-One of the cracks showed Alumina pattern.

Left: Discontinuous crack (depth 0.8mm)

Right: Continuous crack (depth 0.7mm)

Crack depth-0.1mm Crack pattern resembles Alumina pattern

Heat number-72828

Grade-15B25

Diameter- 11mm

Rejection-(rejected coils/total coils)-(2/14)

Rejection-14.28%

Crack type-Discontinuous

Page 16: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

16

Final Conclusion

High rejection around 23-26mm, significantly that of 10B21

10B21 most sensitive to surface cracks, next 15B25 & lastly 15B41.

(Increasing rejection trend with cross-section clearly seen for 10B21, from the data.)

Higher Cross Section gets rejected more because “Crack-Depth” is larger in larger cross-section as

compared to lower cross-section, as depth gets decreased during plastic deformation, so the

acceptability depth of cracks in lower cross-section is mostly not crossed.(Generally for

Rolling Mill-Cracks, without inclusions)

Cracks in lower-cross-section can occur by inclusions(or entrapments), as crack depths don’t get

reduced even after plastic deformation ( Alumina inclusion found in 15B25, 11mm)

Some coils with good surface finish may get rejected if crack opens in UPSETTING, due to more

hardenability.

Problems may be coming from rolling mill largely, as per the metallurgists at QC told, “Full-

Decarb” is generally not found around observed cracks.

Almost every billet of CHQ was billet-grinded, and data from auto & manual mode of billet-

grinding, showed no-effect.

Heat Number-72911

Grade-15B25

Diameter-15mm

Rejection-(rejected coils/total coils)-(7/24)

Rejection-29.16 %

Crack type-Discontinuous

Crack shape is regular, (Rolling-Crack) No inclusion found

Heat Number-72846 Grade-10B21 Diameter-9 mm Rejection-(rejected coils/total coils)-(66/66) Rejection- 100% Crack type-Discontinuous

Crack shape is regular, (Rolling-Crack) No inclusion found

Page 17: Analysis of Surface cracks in CHQ grades

17

At the End of Training

Got the necessary steel industry exposure for 2 continuous months.

Got the opportunity to closely observe the steel manufacturing processes and to relate it to the

theories studied.

Met with different metallurgists of different departments ( from Mini Blast Furnace-MBF, SMS ,

CCM to Rolling and lastly the Quality Department), which highly enriched our experience.

Realized the importance and role of the “Demand-Quality-Plan-Production-Supply” chain in

connection to Industry & its Customers, as from my daily visit in the “Quality Assurance &

Customer Services Department-(QA-CS)”.

As the training period was of just 2 months, coupled with no prior industrial experience & lack of

research facilities at Sunflag and related provisions, an “EXTENSIVE PRACTICAL

STUDY” could not be met, which would have definitely put some more light over the CHQ

problem.