analysis of heat affected zone of mild steel · pdf filespecimen developed due to mig welding...
TRANSCRIPT
399
Int. J. Mech. Eng. & Rob. Res. 2014 Praveen Kumar Yadav et al., 2014
ISSN 2278 – 0149 www.ijmerr.com
Vol. 3, No. 3, July, 2014
© 2014 IJMERR. All Rights Reserved
Research Paper
ANALYSIS OF HEAT AFFECTED ZONE OF MILD STEEL
SPECIMEN DEVELOPED DUE TO MIG WELDING
Praveen Kumar Yadav1*, Md Abbas1 and Shishir Patel1
*Corresponding Author: Praveen Kumar Yadav � [email protected]
The Gas Metal Arc Welding is the most widely used for long continuous welds also it is versatilein nature as spot welds can also be per formed by GMAW. Process requires relatively simpleand lesser skilled labors, so it is mostly automated and once welding parameters established itshould be possible to produce repeatable welds. It is also called as MIG welding. As there is agreat influence of welding conditions on behavior of heat affected zone (HAZ) so the presentwork investigates the effect of welding condition according to mechanical properties of mildsteel and presents the optimum welding condition through the evaluation about the weld abilityof mild steel by the welding conditions such as the welding passes, voltage variation, current,variation, and change in thickness of mild steel flats. In order to find out optimum weldingcondition by the mechanical properties mild steel (0.134% carbon) was selected as a specimenhaving thickness 5, 8,16mm were prepared for experiment. Specimens were welded in therange of 20-24 Volt, 130-150Amp and test pieces out of theses for test of tension, impact andhardness and micro structure have been extracted. The experimental result revealed that withincrease in voltage there is increase in penetration so using the parameters further welding wasperformed. Results show that with increase in current there is increase in hardness of HAZ andultimate tensile strength.
Keywords: Heat affected zone, Mild steel specimen, MIG welding
INTRODUCTION
Selection of the Work Material and
Electrode
Metal inert gas welding is the most versatilewelding and commonly used for making longand continuous weld as it can be easily automated. Metal arc welding was used forexperimentation. The chemical composition
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, IEC College of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida.
of the material used is shown in the TableNo. 1.
For welding mild steel work-piecesCopper-coated mild steel (MIG) electrodehaving specifications IS 6419, (AWS A/SFA5.18) manufactured by Ador welding limitedwas selected which has diameter 1.2 mm. Itprovides stable arc and minimum spatter
400
Int. J. Mech. Eng. & Rob. Res. 2014 Praveen Kumar Yadav et al., 2014
Table 1: Chemical Composition of Materials (wt %)
Material
Mild Steel
under optimum welding conditions. Normallyrecommended with CO2 shielding and canbe used with Ar- CO2 mixtures also. It is allposition electrode meant for MIG welding.Composition of wire is C-0.07-0.14, S-0.025max, Mn-1.40-1.60, O-0.025max, Si-0.80-1.0, Cu-0.5max (% age by weight),mechanical properties of all welded with100% CO2 are UTS-500-550 MP and YS-420-480MP a also it leaves metal free of slagand oxide inclusions and produces soundwelds.
Micro Structural Examination
Micro structural Examination was carried outon Leitz metallurgical microscope. Thephotograph of different zones of weldedspecimen was taken for study. A microstructural photograph of heat affected zonewas taken at 100 magnifications.
The different zones of welded specimenof mild steel can be seen in Figure 4.12 below.
Fe%
99.2
C%
0.134
Si%
0.074
Mn%
0.404
P%
0.056
S%
0.022
Cr%
0.16
Al%
0.002
Cu%
0.009
Figure 1: Different Zones of WeldedSpecimen of Mild Steel
Parent Metal Heat Affected Zone Weld metal Zone
Linear intercept method can be used forgrain size determination from micro structuralphotographs. Length parameter is the meanintercept length.
MPL
×= TL
Where
L = Grain size in mm LT = Total test linelength in mm M = Magnification factor
P = The number of grain boundariesintersecting test line
Mechanical Testing of the Test
Specimens
Hardness Testing:-The Vickers and knooptests make relatively small indentations andare thus well suited for hardness measure-ment of the various regions of the HAZ forfine scale traverses. In Vickers hardness testa know load (P) from 1 to 120 kg dependingon the material to be tested is applied forspecified time to the surface of the materialthrough a square base diamond indenter orpyramid having 136° between opposite faces.The two diagonal of the resulting squareindentation on the test piece are measuredwith a micrometer microscope and averagedD mm is use for calculation of hardness. TheVickers hardness number is calculated as byfollowing equation.
2
1.854PVHN
D=
401
Int. J. Mech. Eng. & Rob. Res. 2014 Praveen Kumar Yadav et al., 2014
RESULTS
This deals with the results of the experimentalfindings of welded joints prepared at differentvoltages, current, number of pass and effectof variation of specimen.
Effect of Voltage on Penetration
Specimens were welded at varying Voltageof 20V, 22V and 24V keeping other conditionsare constant like current=130, wire speed,shielding gas pressure and welding speedetc. By visual observations it was found thatwith increase in voltage there was alsoincrease in penetration as shown below infigures 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3.
Figure 2: Specimen Welded at 20Volts
Figure 3: Specimen Welded at 22Volts
Figure 4: Specimen Welded at 20Volts
Specimen welded at 24volts shows fullpenetration for 1.5 mm face width and it givesbest results in terms of penetration.
So by observing the above results theconditions for welding multiple passes usedare 24V and 130Amp, with electrode wire
speed 22.2mm/sec and welding speed of1to2 mm/sec.The specimens were furthertested for hardness.
Effect of Voltage on Hardness
As we can see from the graph betweendistance from the weld centre and hardnessthere is nearly constant variation of hardnessbut suddenly the parent metal next to weldmetal i.e. HAZ there is increase in hardnessbecause there is a thermal gradient betweenwelding heat and atmospheric temperaturedue to this sudden quenching by air there isformation of martensitic structure in HAZcausing increase in hardness. As we can seethere is increase in HAZ hardness withdecrease in voltage.
Figure 5.4: Effect of VoltageVariation With Hardness
Effect of Variation of Thickness on
Hardness of HAZ
For similar conditions like current of 130Amp,24 voltage, welding speed and wire electrodespeed the following results are obtained.
402
Int. J. Mech. Eng. & Rob. Res. 2014 Praveen Kumar Yadav et al., 2014
Figure 5: Effect of VoltageVariation with Hardness
Figure 6: Effect of VoltageVariation with Hardness
Figure 7: Effect of VoltageVariation with Hardness
Table 2: Variation of Hardness with Voltage
Distancefrom
weldbead
center (mm)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Hardness(HV)
Voltage=20
190
189
186
190
192.4
184
146
140
135
134.1
133.5
134.2
134.5
Hardness(HV)
Voltage=22
188.1
186
185
187
189.2
184.2
145.2
135
134.2
135.1
135.3
134
135.1
Hardness(HV)
Voltage=24
187.2
185.1
182
184
185.3
165.1
143.8
136.9
133.4
135
135.1
135.2
135
Table 3: Effect of Variation ofThickness on Hardness of HAZ
SpecimenThickness
(mm)
5
8
16
Maximum HAZHardness
(HV)
185.3
200.1
190.5
Maximum UTS(Kg/mm2)
34.8
47.15
44.2
Figure 8: Effect of Variation ofThickness on Hardness of HAZ
403
Int. J. Mech. Eng. & Rob. Res. 2014 Praveen Kumar Yadav et al., 2014
CONCLUSION
By visual inspection it was observed that forincrease in voltage there is increase inpenetration and there is slight increase inHAZ hardness with respect to increase InCurrent. So it may be concluded that usinghigher voltage of 24V better penetration canbe obtained. Also the increase penetrationhas forced to perform rest of multiple passwelding with 24 V and 130Amp current. So24V and 130Amp current is recommendedfor welding the specimens.
REFERENCES
1. A Kumar and S Sundarrajan (2009),“Effect of Welding Parameters onMechanical Properties and Optimizationof Pulsed TIG Welding of Al-Mg-Si Alloy”,International Journal of AdvancedManufacturing Technology, Vol. 42, pp.118-125.
2. E Bonneviea, G Ferri`erea, A Ikhlefa, DKaplanb and J M Oraina (2004),“Morphological Aspects of Martensite-austenite Constituents in Intercritical andCoarse Grain Heat Affected Zones ofStructural Steels”, Materials Science andEngineering, Vol. A385, pp. 352-358.
3. G Bussu and P E Irving (2003), “The Roleof Residual Stress and Heat AffectedZone Properties on Fatigue CrackPropagation in Friction Stir Welded 2024-T351 Aluminium Joints”, InternationalJournal of Fatigue, Vol. 25, pp. 77-88.
4. J H Kim and E P Yoon (1998), “NotchPosition in the HAZ Specimen of ReactorPressure Vessel Steel”, Journal ofNuclear Materials, Vol. 257, pp. 303-308.
5. J Neves and A Loureiro (2004), “FractureToughness of Welds-effect of BrittleZones and Strength Mismatch”, Journalof Materials Processing Technology, Vol.153-154, pp. 537-543.
6. M Eroglu and M Aksoy (2000), “Effect ofInitial Grain Size on Microstructure andToughness of Intercritical Heat-affectedZone of a low Carbon Steel”, MaterialsScience and Engineering, Vol. A286, pp.289-297.
7. M Suhan and J Tusek (2001),“Dependence of Melting Rate in MIG/MAG Welding on the Type of ShieldingGas Used”, Journal of MaterialsProcessing Technology, Vol. 119, pp. 185-192.
8. O P Khanna (2001), “A Text Book ofWelding Technology”, Dhanpat RaiPublications, pp. 570-577.
9. P T Oldand, C W Ramsey, D K Matlockand D L Otson (1989), “SignificantFeatures of High Strength Steel WeldMetal Microstructures”, Welding Journal,Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 158s-168s.
10. Wei Zhou and K G Chew (2003), “Effectof Welding on Impact Toughness of Butt-joints in a Titanium Alloy”, MaterialsScience and Engineering, Vol. A347,pp.180-185.
11. Y Makighi, H Kaneshiro and K Miyagi(1987), “The Fundamental Investigationof Metallic Crystal and Hardness in theDeposited Metal and HAZ of Mild SteelWeldments”, Metal Abstract, Vol. 20, No.1, pp. 207.
404
Int. J. Mech. Eng. & Rob. Res. 2014 Praveen Kumar Yadav et al., 2014
12. Yaowu Shi, Dong Chen, Yongping Lei andXiaoyan Li (2004), “School of MaterialsScience and Engineering”, Beijing
University of Technology, Vol. 31, Nos.3-4, pp. 379-388.