analysis of beam

Upload: viknesh-mj

Post on 03-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    1/16

    Problem Description

    Given

    Here, cantilevers beam with a point load at the end is analyzed with two dimensional elements in

    ANSYS Mechanical APDL.

    Preferences

    1. Go to Main Menu -> Preferences

    2. Check the box that says Structural

    3. ClickOK

    PreprocessorElement Type

    1. Go to Main Menu -> Preprocessor ->

    Element Type -> Add/Edit/Delete

    2. ClickAdd

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    2/16

    3. ClickShell -> 4node 181 the elements

    that we will be using are four node elements with six degrees of freedom.

    4. ClickOK

    SHELL181 is suitable for analyzing thin to moderately-thick shell structures. It is a 4-node

    element with six degrees of freedom at each node: translations in the x, y, and z directions, and

    rotations about the x, y, and z-axes. (If the membrane option is used, the element has

    translational degrees of freedom only). The degenerate triangular option should only be used asfiller elements in mesh generation.

    SHELL181 is well-suited for linear, large rotation, and/or large strain nonlinear applications.

    Change in shell thickness is accounted for in nonlinear analyses. In the element domain, both full

    and reduced integration schemes are supported. SHELL181 accounts for follower (load stiffness)

    effects of distributed pressures.

    Real Constantsadd the thickness to beam.

    1. Go to Main Menu -> Preprocessor ->

    Real Constants -> Add/Edit/Delete

    2. ClickAdd

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    3/16

    3. ClickOK

    4. UnderReal Constants for SHELL181 ->

    Shell thickness at node I TK(I) enter 10 (assumed Value)

    for the thickness

    5. ClickOK

    6. ClickClose

    Material properties

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    4/16

    1. Main Menu -> Material Props -> Material Models

    2. Material Model Number 1 -> Structural -> Linear -> Elastic -> Isotropic

    3. Enter210E6for Youngs Modulus (EX) and .3 for Poissons Ratio (PRXY)

    4. ClickOK

    Keypoints

    Since we will be using 2D Elements, our goal is to model the length and width of the beam.

    1. Go to Main Menu -> Preprocessor -> Modeling -> Create ->

    Keypoints -> In Active CS

    In the dialog box key in the following Key points

    No X Y

    1 0 0

    2 100 0

    3 100 10

    4 50 20

    5 50 10

    6 0 20

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    5/16

    Areas

    1. Go to Main Menu -> Preprocessor -> Modeling -> Create ->

    Areas -> Arbitrary -> Through KPs

    2. Select Pick

    3. Connect all Key points

    4. OK

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    6/16

    Meshing

    1. Go to Main Menu -> Preprocessor ->

    Meshing -> Mesh Tool

    2. Go to Size Controls: -> Global -> Set

    3. UnderSIZE Element edge lengthput 2.

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    7/16

    This will create a mesh of square elements

    with width 2 meters.

    4. ClickOK

    5. ClickMesh

    6. ClickPick All

    7. ClickClose

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    8/16

    Loads

    Main Menu -> Preprocessor -> Loads -> Define Loads ->

    Apply -> Structural -> Displacement-> On Lines

    Pick the Line on the left corner

    ClickOK

    8. ClickAll DOF to secure all degrees of freedom

    9. UnderValue Displacement valueput 0. The left

    face is now afixed end

    10. ClickOK

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    9/16

    Point Load

    1. Go to Main Menu -> Preprocessor -> Loads -> Define Loads ->

    Apply -> Structural ->Force/Moment -> On Nodes

    2. Select Pick -> Single -> List of Items

    3. UnderLab Direction of Force/mom select FY

    5. UnderValue Force/moment value type -460

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    10/16

    6. Press OK

    Solution

    1. Go to Main Menu -> Solution ->Solve -> Current LS (solve). LS stands for Load Step. This

    step may take some time depending on mesh size and the speed of your computer (generally a

    minute or less).

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    11/16

    General Postprocessor

    We will now extract the Preliminary Displacement and Von-Mises Stress within our model.

    Displacement

    1. Go to Main Menu -> General Postprocessor -> Plot Results -> Contour Plot -> Nodal

    Solution

    2. Go to DOF Solution -> Displacement Vector Sum

    3. ClickOK

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    12/16

    Equivalent (Von-Mises) Stress

    1. Go to Main Menu -> General Postprocessor -> Plot Results -> Contour Plot -> Nodal

    Solution

    2. Go to Nodal Solution -> Stress -> von Mises stress

    3. ClickOK

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    13/16

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    14/16

    Compute Equivalent stress of the beam analytically and compare the result with the simulationresult

    Von Mises Stress

    Assuming plane stress, the Von Mises Equivalent Stress can be expressed as:

    -------- 1

    we are analyzing the set of nodes through the top center of the cross section of the beam:

    Due to symmetric loading about the yz cross sections, analyzing the nodes through the top center

    will give us deflections that approximate beam theory. Additionally, since the nodes of choice

    are located at the top surface of the beam, the shear stress at this location is zero.

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    15/16

    Using these simplifications, the Von Mises Equivelent Stress from equation 1 reduces to:

    Bending Stress (is given by:

    Where and . From statics, we know that

    So

    With Maximum Stress at

    Here

    P= 460 N

    (x-L)= 50

    B= 10

    H= 10

  • 7/28/2019 Analysis of beam

    16/16

    Simulated Result Analytical result

    Von Mises stress 117.925 138

    Percentage error

    The percent error (%E) in the model Von Mises Stress can be defined as:

    [ ]

    [ ]

    We derive that our model has 14.54 % error in the max equivalent stress. Thus, it is reasonable

    that our choice of two elements through the width of the beam is not Fine a mesh. Since the 2D

    Elements we are using linearly interpolatebetween nodes, we can expect a degree oftruncation

    errorin our model.