analysis of bathymetrical derived features on the belgian

1
4 4 ! ! 4 4 4 4 ( ( ( ( 4 ! ( ( ( ( 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ( 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ! ! ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 4 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 4 ( ( 4 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 4 4 4 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! 466000 468000 470000 5704000 5706000 bedforms (Deleu et al., 2004) medium to large dunes ( ( very-large dunes with lee slope to the NE 4 4 very-large dunes with lee slope to the SW ! ! very-large symmetric dune BPI classes small scale crests crests depressions flats slopes 0 0.5 1 0.25 km UTM31N - WGS84 coordinates Easting (m) Northing (m) Analysis of bathymetrical derived features on the Belgian continental shelf as a support for marine habitat mapping Verfaillie Els 1 , Foster-Smith, Bob 2 ,Van Lancker Vera 1 1 Ghent University, Renard Centre of Marine Geology (RCMG), Krijgslaan 281, S8, 9000 Gent, Belgium ([email protected], Tel. +32 9 264 45 73, Fax +32 9 264 49 67) 2 Envision, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom INTRODUCTION The study area is a kink area in the middle part of the Westhinder offshore tidal sandbank, where a multibeam dataset is available with a resolution of 2 m (Figure 1). Deleu et al. (2004) studied the morphology of this area thorougly. Both on a large and a medium scale the occurrence of features (from sandbank level until medium dune level using the classification of Ashley (1990)) was described and interpreted. Bedforms were manually drawn based on the bathymetry of the map, indicating their strike and asymmetry. The aim of this study is to facilitate and automate the geomorphological analysis, comparing different bathymetrical derived features. Furthermore the geomorphology is analysed in the context of marine habitat mapping, as topographic features are assumed to be important possible habitats for marine organisms. ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( ! ( Smalbank Gootebank Oostdijck Trapegeer Den Oever Fairy Bank Bligh Bank Kwintebank Ravelingen Broersbank Balandbank Stroombank Akkaertbank Thorntonbank Buiten Ratel Oostendebank Wenduinebank Westhinderbank Oosthinderbank Nieuwpoortbank Noordhinderbank Middelkerkebank 440000 460000 480000 500000 520000 5660000 5680000 5700000 5720000 5740000 0 5 10 2.5 km UTM31N - WGS84 coordinates Easting (m) Northing (m) Bathymetry data compiled from the Ministry of the Flemish Community AWZ - WWK added with data from the Hydrographic Office of the Netherlands and the UKHO ! ( Hinderbanken ! ( Kustbanken ! ( Vlaamse Banken ! ( Zeelandbanken Bathymetry (m) 46 0 study area Westhinder study area Hinderbanken MATERIALS AND METHODS 1. Bathymetric position index or BPI: A measure of where a location with a defined elevation is relative to the overall landscape (Weiss (2001), Iampietro & Kvitek (2002) and Lundblad et al. (in press)); Evaluates bathymetry differences between a focal point and the mean elevation of the surrounding cells within a user-defined rectangle, annulus or circle; Aims to distinguish slopes, valleys, ridges and flat areas; generally calculated on a broad-scale (B-BPI) and a fine-scale (F-BPI); Applies a scalefactor (= resolution of bathymetry multiplied by outer radius of annulus) of 24 and 250 (because the medium and large dunes in this area have an average wavelength of 20 to 25 m, the very-large dunes of 250 m); Calculated with ArcGIS Benthic Terrain Modeler or BTM (Wright et al., 2005). 4 4 ! ! 4 4 4 4 ( ( ( ( 4 ! ( ( ( ( 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ( 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ! ! ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 4 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 4 ( ( 4 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 4 4 4 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! 466000 468000 470000 5704000 5706000 bedforms (Deleu et al., 2004) medium to large dunes ( ( very-large dunes with lee slope to the NE 4 4 very-large dunes with lee slope to the SW ! ! very-large symmetric dune Isocluster classes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 0.5 1 0.25 km UTM31N - WGS84 coordinates Easting (m) Northing (m) RESULTS 1. Bathymetric position index or BPI: Classification decision tree (Figure 2), based on B-BPI (4 classes: depressions, crests, flats, slopes) and F-BPI classification (1 class: small-scale crests) results in 5 classes: Figure 3; ‘Small-scale crests’ class corresponds to a large extent to the crestlines of the very-large dunes and, partly, to the crestlines of the medium to large dunes, defined in Deleu et al. (2004) (Figure 3); Combined with an aspect map (orientation of the slopes: Figure 4) the asymmetry of bedforms can be derived; Figure 6: SW-NE profile through a sandbank, very-large dunes, medium to large dunes and 9 sediment samples shows that most of morphological features are extracted using the BPI classification; Most of the tops/slopes of the very-large dunes (central part of profile between 1000 and 4000 m on Figure 6) are clearly classified as small-scale crests; Depressions/crests are only derived for larger features. For medium to large dunes (at right side of 4000 m on profile) only the largest crestlines, depressions and steepest slopes are derived based on the classification; Application on larger area in Hinderbanken (Figure 7): clear distinction between bedforms on sandbanks and swales. 2. Topographic feature recognition – Isocluster classification: Figure 5: similar features could be extracted, although sometimes difficult interpretation of classes; Better extraction of crestlines of medium to large dunes, especially in the NW part of study area; Class 1, 3 = noise; class 2 BPI-flats; class 4, 7, 10 BPI-depressions; class5, 9 BPI-small-scale crests; class 6 BPI-slopes; class 8 BPI-crests. Figure 1: Position of Westhinder study area and larger Hinderbanken study area FURTHER RESEARCH Application of bathymetric derived features on other areas Correlation of bathymetric features with other physical data layers such as multibeam backscatter and sedimentological samples Correlation with marine species/communities to test if they are important possible habitats Other bathymetric derived features will be tested as input parameters for models (e.g. rugosity = topographic roughness with a surface area to planar area ratio, as input for sand transport or biological models) 2. Topographic feature recognition – Isocluster classification: Series of different filters with varying window sizes, reveals different scale features of the bedform morphology; Subtraction of filtered images from other images, with smaller cell sizes, creates residual filtered images; Filtered images, with varying search radii, reveal bedforms ranging from 10 to 100 m and with heights between 0.4 and 3 m; Key scales on different scales (ranging from fine-scale until broad-scale features) are selected from the filtered images to come to a classified image; Calculated with Idrisi software Isocluster unsupervised classification (based on maximum likelihood procedure) of the residual images, creating 10 clusters of bedform features. Figure 2: Classification decision tree developed for Westhinder study area of a B-BPI and a F-BPI classification, resulting in 5 classes: depressions, crests, flats, slopes and small-scale crests 460000 465000 470000 475000 5695000 5700000 5705000 BPI classes small scale crests crests depressions flats slopes 0 2 4 1 km UTM31N - WGS84 coordinates Easting (m) Northing (m) W9413 WH0203.058 WH0203.057 WH0203.052 WH0203.051 WH0203.050 WH0203.049 WH0203.048 WH0203.043 WH0203.042 WH0203.041 WH0203.040 WH0203.036 WH0203.035 WH0203.034 WH0203.033 WH0203.028 WH0203.027 WH0203.026 WH0203.025 WH0203.022 WH0203.021 WH0203.020 WH0203.019 WH0203.018 WH0203.013 WH0203.012 WH0203.011 WH0203.010 WH0203.007 WH0203.006 468000 470000 5704000 5706000 0 0.5 1 0.25 km UTM31N - WGS84 coordinates grab samples Bathymetry (m) -6.00 -38.00 B A Northing (m) Easting (m) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Isocluster classification A B wh0203.058 wh0203.049 wh0203.042 wh0203.035 wh0203.026 wh0203.021 wh0203.010 wh0203.007 W9413 small scale crests crests depressions flats slopes vertical exaggeration of profiles: 40 BPI classification A B wh0203.058 wh0203.049 wh0203.042 wh0203.035 wh0203.026 wh0203.021 wh0203.010 wh0203.007 W9413 A B 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 distance (m) -30 -20 -10 bathymetry (m) wh0203.058 wh0203.049 wh0203.042 wh0203.035 wh0203.026 wh0203.021 wh0203.010 W9413 wh0203.007 REFERENCES Ashley, G.M., 1990. Classification of large-scale subaqueous bedforms: a new look at an old problem. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 60 (1), 160-172. Deleu, S., V. Van Lancker, D. Van den Eynde, and G. Moerkerke, 2004. Morphodynamic evolution of the kink of an offshore tidal sandbank: the Westhinder Bank (Southern North Sea). Continental Shelf Research, 24 (15), 1587-1610. Iampietro, P., and R. Kvitek, 2002. Quantitative seafloor habitat classification using GIS terrain analysis: Effects of data density, resolution, and scale. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ESRI User Conference. San Diego, CA, July 8-12. http://gis.esri.com/library/userconf/proc02 Lundblad, E., D. J. Wright, J. Miller, E. M. Larkin, R. Rinehart, S. M. Anderson, T. Battista, D. F. Naar, and B. T. Donahue, in press, A Benthic Terrain Classification Scheme for American Samoa. Submitted to Marine Geodesy. Weiss, A. D. 2001. Topographic Positions and Landforms Analysis (Conference Poster). ESRI International User Conference. San Diego, CA, July 9-13. Wright, D.J., Lundblad, E.R., Larkin, E.M., Rinehart, R.W., Oregon State University Davey Jones Locker Seafloor Mapping/Marine GIS Lab (project background at http://dusk.geo.orst.edu/esri04/p1433_ron.html ) Joshua Murphy, Lori Cary-Kothera, Kyle Draganov NOAA Coastal Services Center Figure 3: B-BPI and F-BPI classification based on classification decision tree (Figure 2) Figure 5: Isocluster classification of 4 key scale filtered images resulting in 10 classes Figure 6: SW-NE profile through the study area; comparison between BPI and Isocluster classification Figure 7: BPI classification applied on multibeam bathymetric dataset (resolution 2 m) of larger area in Hinderbanken: clear distinction between bedforms on sandbanks and swales. Patchy pattern in swales possible indicator of gravel B-BPI <= -1 stdev -1 stdev < B-BPI < 1stdev >= 1 stdev Depressions Crests Flats & slopes Slope <= 4,01 Flats > 4,01 Slopes F-BPI >= 1 stdev Small scale crests < 1 stdev Crests F-BPI >= 1 stdev Small scale crests < 1 stdev Depressions F-BPI >= 1 stdev Small scale crests < 1 stdev Flats F-BPI >= 1 stdev Small scale crests < 1 stdev Slopes Criteria used in BPI classifications 1 stdev = 1 standard deviation, corresponding to 100 grid value units Raster grid derived from bathymetry Resulting classes Figure 4: Aspect map of Westhinder area makes it possible to derive asymmetry of bedforms 4 4 ! 4 4 4 4 ( ( ( 4 ! ( ( ( ( 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ( 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ! ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 4 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 4 ( ( 4 ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 4 4 4 ! ! ! ! ! 466000 468000 470000 5704000 5706000 bedforms (Deleu et al., 2004) medium to large dunes ( ( very-large dunes with lee slope to the NE 4 4 very-large dunes with lee slope to the SW ! ! very-large symmetric dune aspect (orientation of slope) Flat (-1) North (0-22.5) Northeast (22.5-67.5) East (67.5-112.5) Southeast (112.5-157.5) South (157.5-202.5) Southwest (202.5-247.5) West(247.5-292.5) Northwest (292.5-337.5) North (337.5-360) 0 0.5 1 0.25 km UTM31N - WGS84 coordinates Easting (m) Northing (m)

Upload: others

Post on 16-May-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Analysis of bathymetrical derived features on the Belgian

44

!! 4

444

((

((

4!

((

((

44

4

4

4

4

44

4

4

4

(

444

4

4

4

4

444

4

4

4

4

!!

((

((

((

(

(( (

(

(

((

((

(

((

((

((

(

((

(

(

(

((

(

((

(

(

((

(

4

(

((

((

(

(

(

((

(((

((

(((

((

((

((

((

(

((

(

((

(

((

((

((

((

((

((

(

((

((

((

((

((

((

(

(

(( (

((

((

((

((

((

(

( (

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

4

((

4

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

(

(

((

((

(

((

(

((

(

(

(

((

((

((

((

((

((

(

(

((

(

((

(((

((

(

4

444

!!

!!

!!

466000 468000 470000

5704

000

5706

000

bedforms (Deleu et al., 2004)medium to large dunes

( ( very-large dunes with lee slope to the NE4 4 very-large dunes with lee slope to the SW

! ! very-large symmetric duneBPI classes

small scale crestscrestsdepressionsflatsslopes

0 0.5 10.25km

UTM31N - WGS84 coordinates­

Easting (m)

Nor

thin

g (m

)

Analysis of bathymetrical derived features on the Belgian continental shelf as a support for marine habitat mapping

Verfaillie Els1, Foster-Smith, Bob2,Van Lancker Vera1

1Ghent University, Renard Centre of Marine Geology (RCMG), Krijgslaan 281, S8, 9000 Gent, Belgium ([email protected], Tel. +32 9 264 45 73, Fax +32 9 264 49 67)2 Envision, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

INTRODUCTIONThe study area is a kink area in the middle part of the Westhinder offshore tidal sandbank, where a multibeam dataset is available with a resolution of 2 m (Figure 1). Deleu et al. (2004) studied the morphology of this area thorougly. Both on a large and a medium scale the occurrence of features (from sandbank level until medium dune level using the classification of Ashley (1990)) was described and interpreted. Bedforms were manually drawn based on the bathymetry of the map, indicating their strike and asymmetry.The aim of this study is to facilitate and automate the geomorphological analysis, comparing different bathymetrical derived features. Furthermore the geomorphology is analysed in the context of marine habitat mapping, as topographic features are assumed to be important possible habitats for marine organisms.

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

!(

Smalbank

Gootebank

Oostdijck

Trapegeer

Den Oever

Fairy Bank

Bligh Bank

Kwintebank Ravelingen

Broersbank

BalandbankStroombank

Akkaertbank

Thorntonbank

Buiten Ratel

OostendebankWenduinebank

Westhinderbank

Oosthinderbank

Nieuwpoortbank

Noordhinderbank

Middelkerkebank

440000 460000 480000 500000 520000

5660

000

5680

000

5700

000

5720

000

5740

000 ­

0 5 102.5km

UTM31N - WGS84 coordinates

Easting (m)

Nor

thin

g (m

)

Bathymetry data compiled from the Ministry of the Flemish Community AWZ - WWK

added with data from the Hydrographic Officeof the Netherlands and the UKHO

!( Hinderbanken

!( Kustbanken

!( Vlaamse Banken

!( ZeelandbankenBathymetry (m)

460

study area Westhinder

study area Hinderbanken

MATERIALS AND METHODS1. Bathymetric position index or BPI: • A measure of where a location with a defined elevation is relative to the overall landscape (Weiss (2001), Iampietro & Kvitek (2002)

and Lundblad et al. (in press));• Evaluates bathymetry differences between a focal point and the mean elevation of the surrounding cells within a user-defined

rectangle, annulus or circle;• Aims to distinguish slopes, valleys, ridges and flat areas; generally calculated on a broad-scale (B-BPI) and a fine-scale (F-BPI);• Applies a scalefactor (= resolution of bathymetry multiplied by outer radius of annulus) of 24 and 250 (because the medium and large

dunes in this area have an average wavelength of 20 to 25 m, the very-large dunes of 250 m);• Calculated with ArcGIS Benthic Terrain Modeler or BTM (Wright et al., 2005).

44

!! 4

444

((

((

4!

((

((

44

4

4

4

4

44

4

4

4

(

444

4

4

4

4444

4

4

4

4

!!

((

((

(((

(( (

(

(

((

((

(

((

((

((

(

((

(

(

(

((

(

((

(

(

((

(

4

(

((

((

(

(

(

((

(((

((

(((

((

((

((

((

(

((

(

((

(

((

((

((

((

((

((

(

((

((

((

((

((

((

(

(

(( (

((

((

((

((

((

(

( (

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

4

((

4

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

(

(

((

((

(

((

(

((

(

(

(

((

((

((

((

((

((

(

(

((

(

((

(((

((

(

4

44

4

!!

!!

!!

466000 468000 470000

5704

000

5706

000

bedforms (Deleu et al., 2004)medium to large dunes

( ( very-large dunes with lee slope to the NE4 4 very-large dunes with lee slope to the SW

! ! very-large symmetric duneIsocluster classes

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0 0.5 10.25km

UTM31N - WGS84 coordinates­

Easting (m)

Nor

thin

g (m

)

RESULTS1. Bathymetric position index or BPI: • Classification decision tree (Figure 2), based on B-BPI (4 classes: depressions, crests, flats, slopes) and F-BPI classification (1 class:

small-scale crests) results in 5 classes: Figure 3;• ‘Small-scale crests’ class corresponds to a large extent to the crestlines of the very-large dunes and, partly, to the crestlines of the

medium to large dunes, defined in Deleu et al. (2004) (Figure 3);• Combined with an aspect map (orientation of the slopes: Figure 4) the asymmetry of bedforms can be derived;• Figure 6: SW-NE profile through a sandbank, very-large dunes, medium to large dunes and 9 sediment samples shows that most of

morphological features are extracted using the BPI classification;• Most of the tops/slopes of the very-large dunes (central part of profile between 1000 and 4000 m on Figure 6) are clearly classified

as small-scale crests;• Depressions/crests are only derived for larger features. For medium to large dunes (at right side of 4000 m on

profile) only the largest crestlines, depressions and steepest slopes are derived based on the classification;• Application on larger area in Hinderbanken (Figure 7): clear distinction between bedforms on sandbanks and swales.

2. Topographic feature recognition – Isocluster classification:• Figure 5: similar features could be extracted, although sometimes difficult interpretation of classes;• Better extraction of crestlines of medium to large dunes, especially in the NW part of study area;• Class 1, 3 = noise; class 2 ≅ BPI-flats; class 4, 7, 10 ≅ BPI-depressions; class5, 9 ≅ BPI-small-scale crests;

class 6 ≅ BPI-slopes; class 8 ≅ BPI-crests.

Figure 1: Position of Westhinder study area and larger Hinderbanken study area

FURTHER RESEARCH• Application of bathymetric derived features on other areas• Correlation of bathymetric features with other physical data layers such as multibeam backscatter

and sedimentological samples• Correlation with marine species/communities to test if they are important possible habitats• Other bathymetric derived features will be tested as input parameters for models (e.g. rugosity = topographic

roughness with a surface area to planar area ratio, as input for sand transport or biological models)

2. Topographic feature recognition – Isocluster classification:• Series of different filters with varying window sizes, reveals different scale

features of the bedform morphology;• Subtraction of filtered images from other images, with smaller cell sizes, creates

residual filtered images;• Filtered images, with varying search radii, reveal bedforms ranging from 10 to

100 m and with heights between 0.4 and 3 m;• Key scales on different scales (ranging from fine-scale until broad-scale

features) are selected from the filtered images to come to a classified image;• Calculated with Idrisi software Isocluster unsupervised classification (based on

maximum likelihood procedure) of the residual images, creating 10 clusters ofbedform features.

Figure 2: Classification decision tree developed for Westhinder study area of a B-BPI and a F-BPI classification, resulting in 5 classes: depressions, crests, flats, slopes and small-scale crests

460000 465000 470000 475000

5695

000

5700

000

5705

000

BPI classessmall scale crestscrestsdepressionsflatsslopes

0 2 41km

UTM31N - WGS84 coordinates

­Easting (m)

Nor

thin

g (m

)

W9413

WH0203.058

WH0203.057 WH0203.052

WH0203.051

WH0203.050

WH0203.049

WH0203.048

WH0203.043

WH0203.042

WH0203.041

WH0203.040

WH0203.036

WH0203.035

WH0203.034WH0203.033

WH0203.028

WH0203.027

WH0203.026

WH0203.025

WH0203.022

WH0203.021

WH0203.020

WH0203.019WH0203.018

WH0203.013

WH0203.012

WH0203.011

WH0203.010

WH0203.007

WH0203.006

468000 470000

5704

000

5706

000

0 0.5 10.25km

UTM31N - WGS84 coordinates

grab samples

Bathymetry (m)

-6.00

-38.00

B

A

Nor

thin

g (m

)

Easting (m)

­

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Isocluster classification

A

B

wh0203.058 wh0203.049wh0203.042

wh0203.035wh0203.026

wh0203.021

wh0203.010

wh0203.007W9413

small scale crests

crests

depressions

flats

slopes

vertical exaggeration of profiles: 40

BPI classification

A

B

wh0203.058 wh0203.049 wh0203.042

wh0203.035wh0203.026

wh0203.021

wh0203.010

wh0203.007W9413

AB

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000distance (m)

-30

-20

-10

bath

ymet

ry (m

)

wh0203.058 wh0203.049 wh0203.042wh0203.035 wh0203.026

wh0203.021

wh0203.010

W9413wh0203.007

REFERENCES• Ashley, G.M., 1990. Classification of large-scale subaqueous bedforms: a new look at an old problem. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 60 (1), 160-172. • Deleu, S., V. Van Lancker, D. Van den Eynde, and G. Moerkerke, 2004. Morphodynamic evolution of the kink of an offshore tidal sandbank: the Westhinder Bank (Southern North Sea). Continental Shelf Research, 24 (15), 1587-1610.• Iampietro, P., and R. Kvitek, 2002. Quantitative seafloor habitat classification using GIS terrain analysis: Effects of data density, resolution, and scale. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ESRI User Conference. San Diego, CA, July 8-12.

http://gis.esri.com/library/userconf/proc02• Lundblad, E., D. J. Wright, J. Miller, E. M. Larkin, R. Rinehart, S. M. Anderson, T. Battista, D. F. Naar, and B. T. Donahue, in press, A Benthic Terrain Classification Scheme for American Samoa. Submitted to Marine Geodesy.• Weiss, A. D. 2001. Topographic Positions and Landforms Analysis (Conference Poster). ESRI International User Conference. San Diego, CA, July 9-13.• Wright, D.J., Lundblad, E.R., Larkin, E.M., Rinehart, R.W., Oregon State University Davey Jones Locker Seafloor Mapping/Marine GIS Lab (project background at http://dusk.geo.orst.edu/esri04/p1433_ron.html) Joshua Murphy, Lori Cary-Kothera, Kyle Draganov NOAA Coastal

Services Center

Figure 3: B-BPI and F-BPI classification based on classification decision tree (Figure 2)

Figure 5: Isocluster classification of 4 key scale filtered images resulting in 10 classes

Figure 6: SW-NE profile through the study area; comparison between BPI and Isocluster classification

Figure 7: BPI classification applied on multibeam bathymetric dataset (resolution 2 m) of larger area in Hinderbanken: clear distinction between bedforms on sandbanks and swales. Patchy pattern in swales possible indicator of gravel

B-BPI

<= -1 stdev -1 stdev < B-BPI < 1stdev>= 1 stdev

Depressions Crests Flats & slopes

Slope

<= 4,01

Flats

> 4,01

Slopes

F-BPI

>= 1 stdev

Small scale crests

< 1 stdev

Crests

F-BPI

>= 1 stdev

Small scale crests

< 1 stdev

Depressions

F-BPI

>= 1 stdev

Small scale crests

< 1 stdev

Flats

F-BPI

>= 1 stdev

Small scale crests

< 1 stdev

Slopes

Criteria used in BPI classifications1 stdev = 1 standard deviation, corresponding to 100 grid value units

Raster grid derived from bathymetry

Resulting classes

Figure 4: Aspect map of Westhinder area makes it possible to derive asymmetry of bedforms

44

!

4

444

((

(

4!

((

((

44

4

4

44

44 4

4

4

(

4

44

4

44

4

44

44

4 !(

(

((

(

(

(( (

(

(

((

(

((

(

((

((

(

((

(

(((

((

4

(

((

(

(

(

(

(

(

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

(

((

((

(

(

((

((

((

((

((

(

((

((

((

((

((

(

(

(( (

((

((

((

((

(

( (

((

((

((

((

((

(

4

((4

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

((

(

(

((

((

((

((

((

(

(

(

((

((

(

((

4

4

4

!!

!!

!

466000 468000 470000

5704

000

5706

000

bedforms (Deleu et al., 2004)medium to large dunes

( ( very-large dunes with lee slope to the NE4 4 very-large dunes with lee slope to the SW

! ! very-large symmetric duneaspect (orientation of slope)

Flat (-1)North (0-22.5)Northeast (22.5-67.5)East (67.5-112.5)Southeast (112.5-157.5)South (157.5-202.5)Southwest (202.5-247.5)West(247.5-292.5)Northwest (292.5-337.5)North (337.5-360)

0 0.5 10.25km

UTM31N - WGS84 coordinates

­

Easting (m)

Nor

thin

g (m

)