analysis of algorithms
DESCRIPTION
Analysis of Algorithms. Input. Output. Algorithm. Outline. Running time Pseudo-code Counting primitive operations Asymptotic notation Asymptotic analysis. How good is Insertion-Sort?. How can you answer such questions?. What is “goodness”?. Correctness Minimum use of “time” + “space”. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Analysis of Algorithms
Algorithm
Input Output
Analysis of Algorithms 2
Outline
Running timePseudo-codeCounting primitive operationsAsymptotic notationAsymptotic analysis
Analysis of Algorithms 3
How good is Insertion-Sort?
How can you answer such questions?
What is “goodness”?
1. Measure2. Count3. Estimate
Analysis of Algorithms 4
How can we quantify it?
1. Correctness2. Minimum use of “time” + “space”
Analysis of Algorithms 5
1) Measure it
Write a program implementing the algorithmRun the program with inputs of varying size and compositionUse a method like System.currentTimeMillis() to get an accurate measure of the actual running timePlot the results
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0 50 100
Input Size
Tim
e (
ms)
Analysis of Algorithms 6
Analysis of Algorithms 7
Limitations of Experiments
It is necessary to implement the algorithm, which may be difficultResults may not be indicative of the running time on other inputs not included in the experiment. In order to compare two algorithms, the same hardware and software environments must be used
2) Count Primitive Operations
The Idea Write down the pseudocode Count the number of “primitive
operations”
Analysis of Algorithms 8
Analysis of Algorithms 9
PseudocodeHigh-level description of an algorithmMore structured than English proseLess detailed than a programPreferred notation for describing algorithmsHides program design issues
Algorithm arrayMax(A, n)Input array A of n integersOutput maximum element of A
currentMax A[0]for i 1 to n 1 do
if A[i] currentMax thencurrentMax A[i]
return currentMax
Example: find max element of an array
Analysis of Algorithms 10
Pseudocode Details
Control flow if … then … [else …] while … do … repeat … until … for … do … Indentation replaces
braces
Method declarationAlgorithm method (arg [, arg…])
Input …
Output …
Method callvar.method (arg [, arg…])
Return valuereturn expression
Expressions Assignment
(like in Java) Equality testing
(like in Java)n2 Superscripts and
other mathematical formatting allowed
Analysis of Algorithms 11
The Random Access Machine (RAM) Model
A CPU
An potentially unbounded bank of memory cells, each of which can hold an arbitrary number or character
01
2
Memory cells are numbered and accessing any cell in memory takes unit time.
Random Access Model (RAM)
Time complexity (running time) = number of instructions executedSpace complexity = the number of memory cells accessed
Analysis of Algorithms 12
Analysis of Algorithms 13
Primitive Operations
Basic computations performed by an algorithmIdentifiable in pseudocodeLargely independent from the programming languageExact definition not important (we will see why later)
Examples: Evaluating an
expression Assigning a
value to a variable
Indexing into an array
Calling a method Returning from a
method
Analyzing pseudocode (by counting)
1. For each line of pseudocode, count the number of primitive operations in it. Pay attention to the word "primitive" here; sorting an array is not a primitive operation.
2. Multiply this count with the number of times this line is executed.
3. Sum up over all lines.
Analysis of Algorithms 14
Analysis of Algorithms 15
Counting Primitive Operations
By inspecting the pseudocode, we can determine the maximum number of primitive operations executed by an algorithm, as a function of the input size
Algorithm arrayMax(A, n)
Cost Times
currentMax A[0] 2 1for i 1 to n 1 do 2 n
if A[i] currentMax then 2 (n 1)currentMax A[i] 2 (n 1)
{ increment counter i } 2 (n 1)return currentMax 1 1
Total 8n 3
Analysis of Algorithms 16
Estimating Running Time
Algorithm arrayMax executes 8n 2 primitive operations in the worst case Definea Time taken by the fastest primitive operationb Time taken by the slowest primitive operation
Let T(n) be the actual worst-case running time of arrayMax. We have
a (8n 2) T(n) b(8n 2)
Hence, the running time T(n) is bounded by two linear functions
Insertion Sort
Analysis of Algorithms 17
Hint: 1.observe each line i can be implemented using a constant number of RAM instructions, Ci
2.for each value of j in the outer loop, we let tj be the number of times that the while loop test in line 4 is executed.
Insertion Sort
Analysis of Algorithms 18
Question: So what is the running time?
Time Complexity may depend on the input!
Best Case:?
Worst Case:?
Average Case:?
Analysis of Algorithms 19
Complexity may depend on the input!
Best Case: Already sorted. tj=1. Running time = C * N (a linear function of N)
Worst Case: Inverse order. tj=j.
Analysis of Algorithms 20
Analysis of Algorithms 21
Arithmetic Progression
Neglecting the constants, the worst-base running time of insertion sort is proportional to1 2 …n
The sum of the first n integers is n(n 1) 2
Thus, algorithm insertion sort required almost n2 operations.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1 2 3 4 5 6
What about the Average Case?
Idea: Assume that each of the n!
permutations of A is equally likely. Compute the average over all
possible different inputs of length N.
Difficult to compute!In this course we focus on Worst Case Analysis!
Analysis of Algorithms 22
See TimeComplexity Spreadsheet
Analysis of Algorithms 23
What is “goodness”?
1. Measure wall clock time2. Count operations3. Estimate Computational Complexity
Analysis of Algorithms 24
How can we quantify it?
1. Correctness2. Minimum use of “time” + “space”
Analysis of Algorithms 25
Asymptotic Analysis
Uses a high-level description of the algorithm instead of an implementationAllows us to evaluate the speed of an algorithm independent of the hardware/software environmentEstimate the growth rate of T(n)A back of the envelope calculation!!!
Analysis of Algorithms 26
The idea
Write down an algorithm Using Pseudocode In terms of a set of primitive operations
Count the # of steps In terms of primitive operations Considering worst case input
Bound or “estimate” the running time Ignore constant factors Bound fundamental running time
Analysis of Algorithms 27
Growth Rate of Running Time
Changing the hardware/ software environment Affects T(n) by a constant factor, but Does not alter the growth rate of T(n)
The linear growth rate of the running time T(n) is an intrinsic property of algorithm arrayMax
Analysis of Algorithms 28
Which growth rate is best?
T(n) = 1000n + n2 or T(n) = 2n + n3
Analysis of Algorithms 29
Growth Rates
Growth rates of functions:
Linear n Quadratic n2
Cubic n3
In a log-log chart, the slope of the line corresponds to the growth rate of the function
1E+01E+21E+41E+61E+8
1E+101E+121E+141E+161E+181E+201E+221E+241E+261E+281E+30
1E+0 1E+2 1E+4 1E+6 1E+8 1E+10n
T(n
)
Cubic
Quadratic
Linear
Functions Graphed Using “Normal” Scale
30Analysis of Algorithms
g(n) = 2ng(n) = 1
g(n) = lg n
g(n) = n lg n
g(n) = n
g(n) = n2
g(n) = n3
Analysis of Algorithms 31
Constant Factors
The growth rate is not affected by
constant factors or
lower-order terms
Examples 102n 105 is a
linear function 105n2 108n is a
quadratic function1E+01E+21E+41E+61E+8
1E+101E+121E+141E+161E+181E+201E+221E+241E+26
1E+0 1E+2 1E+4 1E+6 1E+8 1E+10n
T(n
)
Quadratic
Quadratic
Linear
Linear
Analysis of Algorithms 32
Big-Oh NotationGiven functions f(n) and g(n), we say that f(n) is O(g(n)) if there are positive constantsc and n0 such that
f(n) cg(n) for n n0
Example: 2n 10 is O(n) 2n 10 cn (c 2) n 10 n 10(c 2) Pick c 3 and n0 10
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
1 10 100 1,000n
3n
2n+10
n
Analysis of Algorithms 33
f(n) is O(g(n)) iff f(n) cg(n) for n n0
Analysis of Algorithms 34
Big-Oh Notation (cont.)
Example: the function n2 is not O(n)
n2 cn n c The above
inequality cannot be satisfied since c must be a constant
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
1 10 100 1,000n
n^2
100n
10n
n
Analysis of Algorithms 35
More Big-Oh Examples
7n-2
7n-2 is O(n)need c > 0 and n0 1 such that 7n-2 c•n for n n0
this is true for c = 7 and n0 = 1
3n3 + 20n2 + 5
3n3 + 20n2 + 5 is O(n3)need c > 0 and n0 1 such that 3n3 + 20n2 + 5 c•n3 for n n0
this is true for c = 4 and n0 = 21
3 log n + 5
3 log n + 5 is O(log n)
need c > 0 and n0 1 such that 3 log n + 5 c•log n for n n0
this is true for c = 8 and n0 = 2
Analysis of Algorithms 36
Big-Oh and Growth Rate
The big-Oh notation gives an upper bound on the growth rate of a functionThe statement “f(n) is O(g(n))” means that the growth rate of f(n) is no more than the growth rate of g(n)
We can use the big-Oh notation to rank functions according to their growth rate
Analysis of Algorithms 37
Questions
Is T(n) = 9n4 + 876n = O(n4)? Is T(n) = 9n4 + 876n = O(n3)? Is T(n) = 9n4 + 876n = O(n27)?
T(n) = n2 + 100n = O(?)T(n) = 3n + 32n3 + 767249999n2 = O(?)
Analysis of Algorithms 38
Big-Oh Rules (shortcuts)
If is f(n) a polynomial of degree d, then f(n) is O(nd), i.e.,
1. Drop lower-order terms
2. Drop constant factors
Use the smallest possible class of functions Say “2n is O(n)” instead of “2n is O(n2)”
Use the simplest expression of the class Say “3n 5 is O(n)” instead of “3n 5 is O(3n)”
Analysis of Algorithms 39
Rank From Fast to Slow…
T(n) = O(n4) T(n) = O(n log n)
T(n) = O(n2)T(n) = O(n2 log n)
T(n) = O(n)T(n) = O(2n)T(n) = O(log n)
T(n) = O(n + 2n)
Note: Assume base of log is 2 unless
otherwise instructedi.e. log n = log2 n
Analysis of Algorithms 40
Computing Prefix Averages
We further illustrate asymptotic analysis with two algorithms for prefix averagesThe i-th prefix average of an array X is average of the first (i 1) elements of X
A[i] X[0] X[1] … X[i]
Computing the array A of prefix averages of another array X has applications to financial analysis
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
X
A
Analysis of Algorithms 41
Prefix Averages (Quadratic)The following algorithm computes prefix averages in quadratic time by applying the definition
Algorithm prefixAverages1(X, n)Input array X of n integersOutput array A of prefix averages of X #operations A new array of n integers nfor i 0 to n 1 do n
s X[0] nfor j 1 to i do 1 2 … (n 1)
s s X[j] 1 2 … (n 1)A[i] s (i 1) n
return A 1
Analysis of Algorithms 42
Arithmetic Progression
The running time of prefixAverages1 isO(1 2 …n)
The sum of the first n integers is n(n 1) 2
There is a simple visual proof of this fact
Thus, algorithm prefixAverages1 runs in O(n2) time
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1 2 3 4 5 6
Analysis of Algorithms 43
Prefix Averages (Linear)The following algorithm computes prefix averages in linear time by keeping a running sum
Algorithm prefixAverages2(X, n)Input array X of n integersOutput array A of prefix averages of X #operationsA new array of n integers ns 0 1for i 0 to n 1 do n
s s X[i] nA[i] s (i 1) n
return A 1Algorithm prefixAverages2 runs in O(n) time
Analysis of Algorithms 44
properties of logarithms:logb(xy) = logbx + logby
logb (x/y) = logbx - logby
logbxa = alogbx
logba = logxa/logxbproperties of exponentials:a(b+c) = aba c
abc = (ab)c
ab /ac = a(b-c)
b = a logab
bc = a c*logab
SummationsLogarithms and Exponents
Proof techniquesBasic probability
Math you may need to Review
Analysis of Algorithms 45
Big-Omega Definition: f(n) is (g(n)) if there is a constant c
> 0 and an integer constant n0 1 such that f(n) c•g(n) for n n0
An asymptotic lower Bound
Analysis of Algorithms 46
Big-Theta Definition: f(n) is (g(n)) if there are constants c’ > 0 and c’’ > 0 and an integer constant n0 1 such that c’•g(n) f(n) c’’•g(n) for n n0
Here we say that g(n) is an asymptotically tight bound for f(n).
Big-Theta (cont)
Based on the definitions, we have the following theorem:
f(n) = Θ(g(n)) if and only if f(n) = O(g(n)) and f(n) = Ω(g(n)).
For example, the statement n2/2 + lg n = Θ(n2) is equivalent to n2/2 + lg n = O(n2) and n2/2 + lg n = Ω(n2).
Note that asymptotic notation applies to asymptotically positive functions only, which are functions whose values are positive for all sufficiently large n.
Analysis of Algorithms 47
Prove n2/2 + lg n = Θ(n2).
Proof. To prove this claim, we must determine positive constants c1, c2 and n0, s.t. c1 n2<= n2/2 + lg n <= c2 n2
c1 <= ½ + (lg n) / n2 <= c2 (divide thru by n2)
Pick c1 = ¼ , c2 = ¾ and n0 = 2 For n0 = 2, 1/4 <= ½ + (lg 2) / 4 <= ¾, TRUE When n0 > 2, the (½ + (lg 2) / 4) term grows
smaller but never less than ½, therefore n2/2 + lg n = Θ(n2).
Analysis of Algorithms 48
Analysis of Algorithms 49
Intuition for Asymptotic Notation
Big-Oh f(n) is O(g(n)) if f(n) is
asymptotically less than or equal to g(n)
big-Omega f(n) is (g(n)) if f(n) is
asymptotically greater than or equal to g(n)
big-Theta f(n) is (g(n)) if f(n) is
asymptotically equal to g(n)