analysis and interpret at at ion suryah

8/8/2019 Analysis and Interpret at at Ion Suryah

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/analysis-and-interpret-at-at-ion-suryah 1/52

TABLE-1

Constitution of the Victims in the Organization

S.No. Victims No. of Respondents Percentage

1 a. Children 20 57.14

2 b. Women 1 2.85

3 c. Old Aged 0 0

4 d. Mentally Retarded 2 5.71

5 e. Physically Challenged 0 0

6 a&e 1 2.85

7 a,c,d&e 3 8.57

8 a&d 1 2.85

9 a,d&e 2 5.71

10 a&c 2 5.77

11 a,b,c,d&e 1 2.85

12 a,c&e 1 2.85

13 a&b 1 2.85

Total 35 100



Interpretation:

The above table shows that 57% of the Organization was constituted by Children

victims, 2.8% by Women, 5.7% by Mentally retarded, 2.85% by Children andPhysically Challenged, 8.57% by Children, Old Aged, Mentally Retarded and

Physically Challenged, 2.85% by Children and Mentally Retarded, 5.71% by

Children, Mentally Retarded and Physically Challenged, 5.71% by Children and Old

Aged, 2.85% by all the Children, Women, Old Aged, Mentally Retarded and

Physically Challenged, 2.85% by Children, Old Aged and Physically Challenged,

2.85% by Children and Women.



Chart-1

Reason of Starting the Organization



TABLE-2


S.No Reason No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Sympathy 23 65.71

2 Society Plight 4 11.42

3 Motivational Drive 7 20

4 Personal Experience 1 2.87

5 Others 0 0

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table, it shows 65.71% of the respondents started the Organization

because of the Sympathy factor, 20% by the Motivational Drive, 11.42 by Society Plight and the

rest 2.87% by the Bitter Personal Experience.



CHART-2




TABLE-3

Functioning Level of the Organization

S.No. Functioning Level No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Local Level 24 68.57

2 State Level 1 2.85

3 National Level 7 20

4 International Level 3 8.58

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

It is identified from the above table that 68.57% of the respondents Organization

functioned at the Local Level, 2.85% at the State Level, 20% at the National Level and 8.58% at

the International Level.



Chart-3

Functioning Level of the Organization



TABLE-4

Strength of the Organization

S.No. Strength No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Publicity 7 20

2 Funds 23 65.71

3 Volunteers 4 11.42

4 Others 1 2.87

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

It is found from the above table that, 65.7% of the respondents opinioned that their

Organization’s strength was Funds, 20% as Publicity, 11.42% as Volunteers and 2.87% had

some other options.



Chart-4

Strength of the Organization



TABLE-5

Encouragement Mode to the Volunteers of the Organization

S.No. Encouragement Mode No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Events 17 48.57

2 Counseling 15 42.85

3 Seminar 0 0

4 Workshop 1 2.85

5 All 2 5.71

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

It is observed from the above table that, 48.57% of the respondents said that their

Organizations have conducted Events to encourage the Volunteers, 42.85% conduct Counseling,

2.85% conduct Workshops and 5.71% conduct Events, Counseling, Seminar and Workshops.



CHART-5

Encouragement Mode to the Volunteers of the Organization



TABLE-6

Source of Funding the Organization

S.No. Source of Funding No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Government 2 5.73

2 Corporate 14 40

3 Public 17

48.57

4 All above 0 0

5 Others 1 2.85

6 a&b 1 2.85

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it is evidenced that, 48.57% of the respondents received Funds

through Public, 40% through Corporate, 2.85% through Government Public and Corporate and

2.85% had other sources.



Chart-6

Source of Funding the Organization



TABLE-7

Fund Raising Techniques adopted by the Organization

S.No. Fund Raising

Technique

No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Accepting Donations 23 65.79

2 Events 3 8.57

3 Seminar 3 8.57

4 Workshop 2 5.71

5 All 3 8.57

6 a&c 1 2.85

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it is known that, 65.79% of the respondents raised funds through

Accepting the Donations, 8.57% through Events, 8.57% through Seminars, 5.71% throughWorkshops, 2.85% through Accepting Donations and Seminar and 8.57% through all Accepting

Donations, Events, Seminar and Workshop.



Chart-7

Fund Raising Techniques adopted by the Organization



TABLE-8

Status of Government Funds adopted by the Organization

S.No. Government FundsAdopted


1 Received 3 8.50

2 Not Received 32 91.50

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it is interpreted that, 91.50% of the Organization does not receive

Government Funds. 8.50% of the Organizations receive Government Funds.



Chart-8

Status of Government Funds adopted by the Organization



TABLE-9

Difficulties of the Organization in Obtaining Government Funds

S.No. Difficulties No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Intermediaries 12.87

2 Disability to

Approach the System

2 5.71

3 Delayed/Long Process 14 40

4 Others 18 51.42

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it is clean that, 40% of the respondents opinioned that

Delayed/Long Process is the difficulty in getting the Government Funds, 5.71% opinioned as

Disability to Approach the System, 2.87% opinioned as Intermediaries are the difficulty in

getting the Government Funds and 51.42% of the respondents had some other reasons or not

interested.



Chart-9

Difficulties of the Organization in Obtaining Government Funds



TABLE-10

Attainment of Fund Requirements of the Organization

S.No. Attaining Fund

Requirements


1 Attained 28 80

2 Not Attained 7 20

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it is found that, 80% of the respondents feel that the Funds that they

get are enough to run the Organization. 20% of the respondents feel that the Funds that they get

are not enough to run the Organization.



Chart-10

Attainment of Fund Requirements of the Organization



TABLE-11

Table Showing Satisfaction of Government Policies towards the NGO’s by the

Organization

S.No. Satisfaction Factor No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Satisfied 23 65.71

2 Not Satisfied 12 34.29

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it is concluded that, 65.71% of the respondents are satisfied towards

the Government policies on NGO’s. 34.29% of the respondents are not satisfied towards the

Government policies on NGO’s.



Chart-11

Chart Showing Satisfaction of Government Policies towards the NGO’s by the

Organization



TABLE-12

Table-12 Showing Number of Activities of the Organization per Month

S.No. No. of Activites No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Less than 5 11 31.42

2 5-20 15

42.85

3 Above 20 9 25.73

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it is witnessed that, 42.85% of the respondents said that they

conducted 5-20 activities in their Organization per month, 31.42% conducted Less than 5

activities and 25.73% conducted above 20 events.



Chart-12

Chart-12 Showing Number of Activities of the Organization per Month



TABLE-13

Table-13 Showing the Welfare Measures taken by the Organization

S.No. Welfare Measures No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Provide Basic Needs 1 2.87

2 Financial Support 0 0

3 Motivation 2 5.71

4 Education 0 0

5 All Above 31 88.57

6 3 & 4 1 2.85

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it is witnessed that, 5.71% of the respondents said that they have

taken Motivation as the Welfare Measure by the Organization. 2.87% provided Basic Needs,

2.87% provide Motivation and Education, 88.57% taken all the measures such as providing basic

needs, motivation, education and giving financial support.



Chart-13

Chart-13 Showing the Welfare Measures taken by the Organization



TABLE-14

Table-14 Showing the Major Problems of the Organization

S.No. Major Problems No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Fund Raising 14 40

2 Non-Cooperation of

Members

1 2.85

3 Improper Event

Formulation

1 2.85

4 Place for

Accommodation

9 25.76

5 All the Above 6 17.14

6 Others 4 11.40

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it is found that, 40% of the respondents faced difficulty in Raising

Funds for the Organization. 25.76% had difficulty in providing Place for Accommodation,

2.85% had problem in Non-Cooperation of the Members, 2.85 had problem in Event

Formulation, and 17.14% had problems in Fund Raising, Non-Cooperation of Members,

Improper Event Formulation and Providing Place for Accommodation. Whereas 11.40% of therespondents had other reasons.



Chart-14

Chart-14 Showing the Major Problems of the Organization



TABLE-15

Table-15 Showing the Nature of Professionals Working in the Organization

S.No. Nature of Professionals


1 Graduates in Social

Work

8 22.85

2 Graduates in Other

Discipline

8 22.85

3 Teachers 3 8.60

4 Trainees 8 22.85

5 All the Above 8 22.85

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it is evidenced that, 22.85% of the Graduates in Social worked in

the Organization, 22.85% are Graduates in other Discipline, 22.85% are Trainees, 8.5% are

Teachers and 22.85% are the combination of Graduates in Social Work, Graduates in Other

Discipline, Teachers and Trainees.



Chart-15

Chart-15 Showing the Nature of Professionals Working in the Organization



TABLE-16

Table-16 Showing the Adopted Techniques of the Organization to Overcome the

Problems

S.No. Adopted Techniquesto Overcome

Problems


1 Seek Help from

Government

19 54.28

2 Negotiate with the

Corporate

13 37.14

3 Approach Educational

Institutions

1 2.85

4 District Camp 2 5.73

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it can be said that, 54.28% of the respondents stated that to seek

help from Government is a technique to overcome the problems, 37.14% negotiated with

Corporate, 5.73% conducted District Camps 2.85% approached Educational Institutions.



Chart-16

Chart-16 Showing the Adopted Techniques of the Organization to Overcome the

Problems



TABLE-17

Table-17 Showing the Request towards the Government by the Organization

S.No. Request Towards theGovernment


1 Ration Assistance 9 25.71

2 Place for Accommodation

8 22.85

3 Nothing 2 5.74

4 Others 11 31.42

5 a&b 5 14.28

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it can be said that, 25.71% of the respondents requested the

Government to give Ration Assistance for their Organization, 22.85% request to give Place of Accommodation, 14.28% request to give both Ration Assistance and Place of Accommodation

and 31.42% had some other requests.



Chart-17

Chart-17 Showing the Request towards the Government by the Organization



TABLE-18

Table-18 Showing the Number of Victims in the Organization

S.No. Number of Victims No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Below 50 15 42.85

2 50-100 11 31.44

3 Above 100 9 25.71

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it can be confirmed that, 42.85% of organizations had victims

within the range below 50, 31.4% had between 50 and 100 and 25.7% had above 100.



Chart-18

Chart-18 Showing the Number of Victims in the Organization



TABLE-19

Table-19 Showing the Adequacy of Place of Accommodation in the Organization

for the Victims

S.No. Adequacy of Place of Accommodation


1 Yes 28 80

2 No 7 20

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it can be said that, 80% of the Organizations had enough place of

accommodation for the victims, 20% had no enough place for accommodation.



Chart-19

Chart-19 Showing the Adequacy of Place of Accommodation in the Organization

for the Victims



TABLE-20

Table-20 Showing the Adequacy of Food in the Organization for the Victims

S.No. Adequacy of Food No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Yes 33 94.29

2 No 2 5.71

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it can be said that, 94.29% of the respondents stated that the food

for victims was adequate and 5.71% had no adequate food.



Chart-20

Chart-20 Showing the Adequacy of Food in the Organization for the Victims



TABLE-21

Table-21 Showing Management of Food in the Organization for the Victims

S.No. Management of Food No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Self Funds 23 65.72

2 Donations 6 17.14

3 Sponsors 6 17.14

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it can be declared that, 65.72% of organizations managed food for the victims through Self Funds, 17.14% through Donations and 17.14% through sponsors.



Chart-21

Chart-21 Showing Management of Food in the Organization for the Victims



TABLE-22

Table-22 Showing the Adequacy of Clothing in the Organization for the Victims

S.No. Adequacy of Clothing No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Yes 33 94.29

2 No 2 5.71

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it can be said that, 94.29% of the victims in organization hadadequate clothing and 5.71% had no adequate clothing.



Chart-22

Chart-22 Showing the Adequacy of Clothing in the Organization for the Victims



TABLE-23

Table-23 Showing Management of Clothing in the Organization for the Victims

S.No. Management of

Clothing


1 Self Funds 19

54.28

2 Donations 9 25.72

3 Sponsors 7 20

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it can be declared that, 54.2% of the respondents managed Clothing

for the victims in their Organization through their Self Funds, 25.72% through Donations and

20% through Sponsors.



Chart-23

Chart-23 Showing Management of Clothing in the Organization for the Victims



TABLE-24

Table-24 Showing the Expenses Incurred for the Organization per Month

S.No. Expenses Incurred No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Below Rs. 20,000 3 8.58

2 Rs. 20,000- Rs.

50,000

20 57.14

3 Rs. 50,000 – Rs.

1,00,000

6 17.14

4 Above Rs. 1,00,000 6 17.14

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it can be declared that, 57.14% of the respondents spent between

Rs.20,000 and Rs.50,000 per Month to run the Organization, 17.14% spent between Rs.50,000

and Rs.1,00,000 per Month, 17.14% spent above Rs.1,00,000 per Month and 8.58% spent below

Rs.20,000 per Month.



Chart-24

Chart-24 Showing the Expenses Incurred for the Organization per Month



TABLE-25

Table-25 Showing the Budget Management of the Organization

S.No. Budget Management No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Managed 31 88.58

2 Not Managed 4 11.42

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it can be said that, 88.58% of the respondents managed their

expenses of their Organization within the prescribed Budget, 11.42% did not manage their

expenses within the prescribed Budget.



Chart-25

Chart-25 Showing the Budget Management of the Organization



TABLE-26

Table-26 Showing the Suggested Solutions to overcome the Problems of the

Organization

S.No. Suggested Solutions No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Creating Awareness

Among Public

24 68.59

2 Increasing

Memberships

1 2.85

3 ApproachingGovernment for Help

4 11.42

4 Increasing MarketingAspects

6 17.14

Total 35 100

Interpretation:

From the above table it can be said that, 68.59% of the respondents say that Creating

Awareness among the Public is the Best suggested solution to overcome the various problems

that the Organizations’ face, 17.14% insist in increasing the Marketing Aspects (like Brouchersand Websites), 11.42% of the respondents feel to Approach Government for Help and 2.85%

suggest Increasing the Memberships.

analysis and interpret at at ion suryah

Documents