analysis and consequences of the iridium 33- cosmos 2251 collision · 2010-05-17 · iridium 33....

17
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Analysis and Consequences of the Iridium 33- Cosmos 2251 Collision Phillip Anz-Meador 1 and J.-C. Liou 2 1 ESCG Jacobs, Houston, Texas, USA 2 NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20100008433 2020-03-10T18:47:16+00:00Z

Upload: others

Post on 10-Mar-2020

9 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Analysis and Consequences of the Iridium 33-Cosmos 2251 Collision

Phillip Anz-Meador1 and J.-C. Liou21 ESCG Jacobs, Houston, Texas, USA

2 NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20100008433 2020-03-10T18:47:16+00:00Z

2/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Outline

• The spacecraft• Circumstances of the collision event• Physical characterization of the debris clouds

– Characteristic size, mass, and area-to-mass (A/m)– Directionality and ∆v distributions– Momentum transfer

• Comparisons with the NASA Standard Breakup Model

• Long-term evolution of the debris clouds• Conclusions

3/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

The Spacecraft ICosmos 2251

• The Strela-2M series utilized the versatile NPO-PM KAUR-1 standard bus (Kosmicheskiy Apparat Unversalnogo Ryada-1, (Космический АппаратУниверсального Ряда), which can be translated as Spacecraft Bus from the Standardized Line (Group)-1). In addition to the LEO communication constellation Strela-2/-2M, the KAUR-1 bus has served as the basis for navigation (Tsiklon/Parusmilitary series and Tsikada civil series and Nadezhda civil COSPAS/SARSAT subseries), geodesy (Sfera and GEO-IK/Musson), and science (Ionosfernaya, Cosmos 381 ionospheric topside sounder) spacecraft.

• Background: family album of spacecraft using the KAUR-1 bus; middle inset: cross section of a Nadezhda spacecraft*; top inset: a Strela-2M spacecraft**

* after Russian Space News, issue 24 (1994), p. 24** FROM: http://www.astronautix.com/craft/strela2m.htm

4/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

The Spacecraft IIIridium 33

From: Rudiger et al., Application of Existing Satellites to Space and Earth Science Missions, 1997.

•The Iridium first-generation constellation utilized the Lockheed-Martin LM700A bus, shown in exploded view (left) and with Iridium nadir payload module (above)

5/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

The Spacecraft IIIphysical & operational characteristics

Cosmos 2251 Iridium 33

bus KAUR-1 LM700A

dry mass [kg] 900 (estimated) 556

Shape Cylinder with boom Triangular prism with panels

Stabilization Gravity gradient 3 axis

Size 2 m x 2 m (body) 3.6 m long

onboard energy sources

Core cylinder may have been pressurized

Hydrazine tanks for thrusters; NiH2battery

Initial orbit 800x776 km, 74°inclination

779x776 km, 86.4°inclination

status derelict operational

6/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

The collision event

Estimated collision parameters:

Event time: 10 February 2009, 16h 55m 59.8s GMTLocation: 72.50° N latitude

97.86° E longitude778.6 km altitude

Relative velocity: 11.647 km/sDirectionality: from the viewpoint of the Iridium 33 spacecraft, Cosmos 2251 approached at an elevation of -2.6° and an azimuth (measured from North) of 231°Orbital distribution: see Gabbard charts on next 2 pp.

7/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Cosmos 2251 Gabbard diagram

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

85 95 105 115

altit

ude

km]

period [min]

C2251 apogee series, June 2010

C2251 perigee series, June 2010

C2251 apogee srs, June 2009

C2251 perigee srs, June 2009

8/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Iridium 33 Gabbard diagram

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

85 90 95 100 105 110 115

altit

ude

[km

]

period [min]

Iri33 apogee srs, June 2010

Iri33 perigee srs, June 2010

Iri33 apogee srs, June 2009

Iri33 perigee srs, June 2009

9/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Physical characterization of the debris clouds Icharacteristic size distribution

1

10

100

1000

10000

0.01 0.1 1 10

Cum

ulat

ive

Num

ber

Diameter (m)

Size Distributions of Iridium 33, Cosmos 2251, and FY-1C Fragments

FY-1C

Iridium 33

Cosmos 2251

10/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Physical characterization of the debris clouds IImass distribution

1

10

100

1000

10000

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000

cum

ulat

ive

num

ber [

-]

mass [kg]

Cosmos 2251

Iridium 33

power law fit, C2251

power law fit, Iri33

Masses estimated using median A/m and characteristic lengths; power law slope is -1.2, considerably steeper than standard breakup model.

“step” indicative of objects with no size (RCS) data

11/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

A/M Distribution of Iridium 33 Fragments (1/2)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

-3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Num

ber

Log10(A/M m2/kg)

A/M Distribution of Iridirm 33 Fragments

NASA Breakup Model Prediction

TLE Data (17 May 2010)

12/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

A/M Distribution of Iridium 33 Fragments (2/2)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

-3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Num

ber

Log10(A/M m2/kg)

A/M Distribution of Iridirm 33 Fragments

NASA Breakup Model Prediction

TLE Data, A/M/3 (17 May 2010)

13/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

A/M Distribution of Cosmos 2251 Fragments

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

-3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Num

ber (

Nor

mal

ized

)

Log10(A/M m2/kg)

A/M Distribution of Cosmos 2251 Fragments

NASA Breakup Model Prediction

TLE Data (17 May 2010)

14/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Comparison of the Two Fragment Clouds

15/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Physical characterization of the debris clouds IV

• SSN Catalog data analysis� ∆v and directionality distributions have been

estimated for both clouds, but are currently under review

– Little or no momentum transfer observed in cataloged clouds

• Haystack/HAX data analysis– Both clouds were observed by the Haystack and

Haystack Auxiliary (HAX) radars shortly after the event

– Analysis ongoing

16/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Long-term evolution of the debris clouds

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

2035

2040

2045

2050

2055

2060

2065

2070

2075

2080

2085

2090

2095

2100

2105

2110Pe

rcen

t of O

bjec

ts S

till

in O

rbit

Year

Percent of Cosmos 2251/Iridium 33 Collision FragmentsStill in Earth Orbit as a Function of Calendar Year

% of Cosmos 2251 fragments

% of Iridium 33 fragments

17/17

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Conclusions

• A very large, very energetic event:– C2251: 1267 fragments cataloged; 1212 on orbit as of 10

June 2010 SSN catalog– Iri33: 521 fragments cataloged, of which 498 are on orbit– History indicates that cataloging may continue for some time– Impact velocity highest of known intentional & accidental

collisions

• These debris clouds will influence the LEO environment for decades to come

• Significant work remains to be done to understand origin of A/m distribution (Iri33), mass and size distributions in context of the NASA standard breakup model