an extensive review on sunscreen and suntan preparationsbackground ra (re) was the primary name of...

Background

Ra (Re) was the primary name of the sun god of Ancient Egypt. According to Osiris myth, Nut, the mother of Osiris swallowed the setting sun (Ra) each evening and gave birth to him each morning. The Ancient Egyptians were well aware of the dangers of the sun. Their lands were scorched with heat. Women protected their skin, preferring light skin to dark in their cultural hierarchy of beauty. Recent discoveries written on papyri and the walls of several tombs unearthed ingredients and formulations in use in Ancient Egypt specifi-cally addressing issues of sun damage to the hair and skin. Also, a brief historical review manifests the following inter-

Mohiuddin AKDepartment of Pharmacy, World University of Bangladesh

Corresponding Author: Mohiuddin AK, Department of Pharmacy, World University of Bangladesh, 151/8, Green Road Dhanmondi, Dhaka - 1205, Bangladesh

AbstractThe sunscreen industry is achieving remarkable worldwide prominence by responding to the growing need for skin pro-tection with fast-paced innovation. Increased consumer awareness of the harmful effects of sunlight has fueled the de-mand for improved photo protection. The need for broad-spectrum protection from both UVA and UVB rays has inspired scientists worldwide to research new cosmetic formulations and delivery systems. More effective sunscreen actives, emol-lients and novel cosmetic and functional ingredients have been regularly added to the formulator’s repertoire. Creativity in innovation has been hindered only by regulatory agencies and patent restrictions worldwide. Familiarity with the cur-rent restrictive regulations and patent law infringements has become integral to any research effort attempting to provide improved protection to individuals affected by the sun’s damaging effects. The increasing incidence of skin cancers and photo damaging effects caused by ultraviolet radiation has increased the use of sun screening agents, which have shown beneficial effects in reducing the symptoms and reoccurrence of these problems. Unlike the situation in Europe where sunscreen ingredients are considered under cosmetics guidelines, the FDA is required to define sunscreens as drugs since they are advertised to prevent sunburn and, more recently, the risk of skin cancer. In the USA, the FDA has been regulat-ing this industry since August 25, 1978, with the publication of the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Sunscreens are considered drugs and cosmetics and therefore must be governed by the FDA-OTC monograph. With the variety of sunscreen agents used in cosmetic and UV protection products, Australia, Canada, and the European Union (EU) have also developed regulatory protocols on safe sunscreen product use. Unlike the USA though, Australia has approved 34 active sunscreen ingredients and the EU has approved 28 of these ingredients. Current FDA regulations allow labeling of sun-screen products to a maximum of 30þ, despite the many products currently available with numbers as high as 100. From a cosmetic formulation point of view, increasing the SPF number in a product is governed by simple chemical principles. (Figure 1)

Abbreviations: Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC); Kruppel Like Factor 4 (KLF4); Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor Gamma (PPARG); Antigen Presenting Cell (APC); Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB); Environmental Working Group (EWG); Generally Recognized As Safe And Effective (GRASE); P-Aminobenzoic Acid (PABA); Mesoporous Silicas (MSs); Hydroxypropyl-Beta-Cyclodextrin (HPCD); Octyl Methoxycinnamate (OMC); Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS); Psoralen plus UVA (PUVA); Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD); Major Depressive Disorder (MDD); Actinic Keratosis (AK); Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC); Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC); Polymeric Nanoparticles (NPs); Bisethylhexyloxy phenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine (BEMT); Solid Lipid Nanoparticle (SLN); High-Density Polyethylene/Low-Density Polyethylene (HDPE/LDPE);

An Extensive Review on Sunscreen and Suntan Preparations

Received: May 06, 2019; Accepted: June 13, 2019; Published: June 25, 2019

esting things indeed:

• Jasmin was used to heal the sun-damaged skin. Recent evidence reveals that Jasmin aids in DNA repair at the cellular level.

• Aloe was used to heal sun-damaged skin.

• Olive oil was used as a hydrating oil for both skin and hair damaged by overexposure to the sunlight.

• Almond oil was applied before and after sun exposure to hydrate the sun-damaged skin, improving elasticity and texture.

• Rice bran extracts were used in sunscreen preparations.

Copyright © 2019 Mohiuddin AK. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Volume - 1 Issue - 1

• of 2 •

OSP Journal of Clinical Trials

Review Article

Today, gamma oryzanol extracted from rice bran has UV absorbing properties.

• kohl (to darken eyes in order to combat sunlight impair-ment to the retina in the glare of the desert sun), red ochre (to redden and impart a rosy glow in women’s makeup mimicking the effect of the sun on the skin), and henna oil (to dye the lips and nails, darken the col-or of the hair and skin, and protect light skin from the sun). Today, henna is one of the most widely used natu-ral sunscreen with both UVA and UVB protection.

• Lupin extract was used to block the rays of the sun and is still used to date to lighten the color of the skin.

• Calcite powder and clay were used as UV filters simi-lar to the modern-day inorganic particulates zinc oxide and titanium dioxide.

• Aquatic lotus oil was used for protection of the skin from the sun.

Introduction

Security from daylight is frequently likened with utilization of sunscreens, yet this methodology is excessively thin, and assurance should comprise of a bundle of measures: main-taining a strategic distance from overexposure to daylight, utilizing sunscreens, and wearing protective apparel. Sun powered bright (UV) radiation fundamentally impacts the skin, causing maturing, sunburns, precancerous and harm-ful sores, and immunosuppression. UV radiation immune suppressively affects the antigen-presenting cells inside the epidermis and adds to the probability of skin disease. In the event that sun oriented radiation is an essential hazard fac-tor for dangerous melanoma, it is reasonable to infer that reducing sun exposure by means of topical sunscreen use would be related with reduced malady chance. Melanoma is more typical in Whites than in Blacks and Asians. The oc-currence of non-melanoma skin malignant growth (NMSC) is significantly increasing around the world, in spite of the

Figure 1. Diana, Princess of Wales, Vogue 1981. According to the magazine Longevity, Princess Diana was "scrupulous about using an SPF-8 sunblock." While the American Academy of Dermatology recommends applying at least SPF 30, protection against UV rays can prevent both sunburn and dangerous skin cancers (Source: Picard C. 25 Beauty Secrets to Steal from Princess Diana. Web GoodHousekeeping.com, Mar 7, 2017).

increased utilization of improved sunscreens. In 2014, the Surgeon General evaluated that 2.2-5.0 million individuals were treated yearly for NMSC. As the quantity of recently analyzed skin tumors keeps on ascending, there is a require-ment for extra preventative measures past sunscreens. UV radiation is the second most prevalent cancer-causing expo-sure in Canada, fifth in Switzerland and is also significant in different nations with substantial Caucasian populaces. In-side the UK, Wales has among the most elevated rates of skin malignant growth every year and skin disease conclusion rates have increased 63% in 10 years. Australia and New Zealand having the world's most elevated skin malignant growths. Individuals living in Australia and New Zealand are currently encouraged to apply sunscreen consistently when the UV record is predicted to reach 3 or above. Denmark has one of the most astounding frequencies of melanoma on the planet, despite the fact that it is a relatively northern nation. Suggestions for general wellbeing: Increased utiliza-tion of sunscreen as a feature of the everyday schedule to reduce accidental sun exposure will prompt decreased oc-currence of skin malignant growth in the future. There are 3 sorts of UV radiation: UVC, UVB, and UVA. The ozone layer ingests 100% of UVC, 90% of UVB, and an immaterial mea-sure of UVA. Therefore, fatigue of the ozone layer extends UV transmission. UVA is related with maturing and pigmen-tation. It enters significant into the skin layer and creates free extreme oxygen species, in an indirect way harming DNA. UVA grows the number of ignitable cells in the dermis and decreases the number of antigens presenting cells. UVB causes sunburn and DNA strand breaks. It causes pyrimi-dine dimer changes which are related with non-melanoma skin malignancies. Photoprotection incorporates both fun-damental and optional protective factors. Basic factors are sunscreens; these fuse physical hindrances which reflect and disseminate light, and substance boundaries which in-gest light. Optional parts join malignant growth prevention specialists, osmolytes, and DNA repair chemicals which help to oblige skin hurt by maddening the photochemical course that occurs by UV daylight. Individuals with dark skin are significantly less helpless to sunburn than white-skinned people. Dark individuals living in the UK were more liable to utilize sunscreen as a type of sun insurance, whereas sun-screen was the least famous methodology in the two African nations with shade being the most well-known type of re-stricting sun exposure. A huge profit by regular sunscreen use has not yet been shown for essential prevention of basal cell carcinoma and melanoma. Concerning the prevention of actinic keratoses, squamous cell carcinomas, and skin ma-turing, the impact of sunscreens is critical, yet it remains inadequate. Some organic UV channels (PABA subsidiaries, cinnamates, benzophenones, and octocrylene) have been depicted to cause photograph sensitivity. Percutaneous re-tention and endocrine upsetting action of little estimated organic and nano-sized inorganic UV channels have been reported.

Positive Effects of UVR

Exposure to UVR isn't constantly considered awful. Truth be


Citation: Mohiuddin AK (2019) An Extensive Review on Sunscreen and Suntan Preparations. OSP J Clin Trials. 1: JCT-1-105

Copyright © Mohiuddin AKOSP J Clin Trials

• of 25 •

told, UVR has been observed to be especially useful in treat-ing nutrient D lack, regular full of feeling issue, psoriasis, sarcoidosis, mycosis fungoides, and various different cuta-neous conditions. Inside the epidermis, 7-dehydrocholes-terol is changed over to nutrient D (cholecalciferol) by UVB light. The older and youthful children are the ones who are especially powerless to nutrient D insufficiency. Nutrient D insufficiency can prompt rickets in children, osteomalacia in grown-ups, osteopenia/osteoporosis, and factures in the old. The Institute of Medicine recommends the accompany-ing nutrient D stipends: 400 IU for 0 to a year, 600 IU for 1 to 70 years, and 800 IU for greater than 70 years. Light treat-ment is a modest treatment and can be valuable in treating certain sicknesses. In spite of the fact that it has been known throughout the previous 100 years that UV light (especially UVC with a wavelength scope of 240-280 nm) is very germi-cidal, its utilization to treat wound or other limited diseases remains at a beginning time of advancement. Candida Auris is a universally developing yeast, causing severe contamina-tions in patients with fundamental illnesses. This yeast is responsible for a few outbreaks inside healthcare offices, where it very well may be found on medical clinic surfaces and patient care gadgets. Spread from these fomites might be prevented by improving the cleaning of emergency clinic surfaces. UV-C disinfecting may comprise a powerful sub-ordinate to routine room cleaning. Also, hard to-treat pso-riasis patients now and then discover relief with UVR. It is felt that UVR has both antiproliferative and calming impacts through downregulation of T-cell response to antigens. Studies have likewise appeared of the cutaneous impacts of sarcoidosis with UVA-1 light and topical psoralen in addi-tion to UVA (PUVA) treatment. PUVA and narrowband UVB has been appeared to actuate and keep up remissions of my-cosis fungoides. Phototherapy is the utilization of light for reducing the grouping of bilirubin in the collection of babies. In any case, the exposure to UV in youth has been set up as a significant contributing variable for melanoma hazard in grown-ups and considering the high helplessness to UV-actuated skin harm of the infant, related to his pigmentary characteristics, the UV exposure of the newborn child amid phototherapy ought to be "as low as reasonably attainable," taking into account that it is pointless to the treatment. Pro-tective eyewear can be essential amid infant help exercises did in nearness of certain sources. The vast majority judge sun exposure in non-erythemic portions as wonderful. Ex-posure to daylight has been connected to improved vitality and raised state of mind. Regular full of feeling issue (SAD) is an occasional example of recurrent real depressive scenes that most generally happens amid pre-winter or winter and remits in spring. The prevalence of SAD reaches from 1.5% to 9%, contingent upon scope. Proof on light treatment as preventive treatment for patients with a past filled with SAD is constrained, preventive treatment of SAD and the treat-ment chose ought to be firmly founded on patient prefer-ences Light treatment, a successful treatment for occasional full of feeling issue (SAD), may likewise be fitting for MDD which is the second-positioned reason for inability around the world. Splendid light treatment, both as monotherapy and in blend with fluoxetine, was effectual and all around

endured in the treatment of grown-ups with nonseasonal MDD. The mix treatment had the most predictable impacts [77-83].

Sunburn

Sunburn and sunscreen facts

1. Sunburn and sun poisoning are forms of skin damage due to UV ray exposure. The symptoms can range from mild to severe and may require treatment.

2. Sunburn might be sun poisoning if there is blisters, hives or rash, fever and chills, nausea, dehydration, headache, pain and tingling, vision problems [1].

3. UV rays are most intense at noon and the hours imme-diately before and after (between 10AM and 4PM) [2], [10].

4. Immediate symptoms of sunburn are hot, red, tender skin; pain when the skin is touched or rubbed; and dehydration; several days after exposure the skin may swell, blister, and peel [3].

5. Most sunburns are mild and can be treated with home remedies such as applying damp cloths or compresses to reduce the pain, soaking in a tepid bath (with no soap), gently patting the skin dry, applying soothing creams or lotions, OTC pain relievers such as Tylenol or others, and moisturizing the skin [4].

6. Sunburn may cause permanent skin damage and skin cancer (malignant melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma) [5].

7. Persons with certain pigment disorders and individuals with fair skin are at most risk of sunburn [6].

8. Certain diseases and conditions pose a higher risk of sunburn (for example, albinism, lupus, porphyria, vit-iligo, and xeroderma pigmentosum) [7].

9. Some medications may increase sensitivity to sunburn (photosensitivity) [8], [10].

10. Sun poisoning is caused by severe sunburn; its symp-toms include fever, nausea, chills, dizziness, rapid pulse, rapid breathing, dehydration, and shock [9].

11. UVA and UVB are mainly responsible for skin patholo-gies such as sunburns, cutaneous degeneration, photo-sensitivity, phototoxicity, photo-aging, immunosuppres-sion and skin cancer [27].

12. Snow reflects up to 80% of the sun’s rays, sand reflects 15%, and grass, soil, and water reflect 10%. Due to these factors, an individual sitting under a solitary standard beach umbrella can be exposed to up to 84% of the to-




• of 25 •

tal UV radiation despite feeling adequately covered. For these reasons, it is best to seek deep shade [28].

13. Less than 50% of the SPF number claimed on the label is spread on the consumer's skin, meaning that a sun-screen with an SPF 30 will give the real protection of an SPF of 15. Therefore, SPF 60 should be recommended if real protection of 30 is desired. Significant injury, DNA damage, mutations, and carcinogenesis can and do oc-cur also with cumulative sub-erythemal UV exposure [29].

14. The SPF was created in 1956 by Schulze and it reflects the ratio between the lower amount of UV energy re-quired to produce a minimal erythema on sunscreen protected skin and the amount of energy required to produce the same erythema on unprotected skin [31].

15. Since many of UV filters were shown to cross the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB), the risk for neurotoxicity also oc-curs [37].

16. Sunscreen compounds might block vitamin D synthesis or act as endocrine disruptor and lead to developmental toxicity. The effects of sunscreen on cutaneous synthe-sis of vitamin D induced by sunlight have been a subject of debate for recent years, however the newest analysis suggests, that normal usage of sunscreen by adults do not decrease cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D [38].

17. The FDA is notoriously slow in approving sunscreen compounds, requiring exhaustive evidence of their safety. Indeed, FDA has approved only 16 sunscreen in-gredients (14 organic filters and two nonorganic filters, including zinc oxide and titanium dioxide), while other areas of the world, like the European Union and Austra-lia, have approved nearly twice as many [39].

18. FDA approved sunscreen ingredients are Aminobenzoic acid, Avobenzone, Cinoxate, Dioxybenzone, Homosalate, Meradimate, Octocrylene, Octinoxate, Octisalate, Oxy-benzone, Padimate O, Ensulizole, Sulisobenzone, Tita-nium dioxide, Trolamine salicylate, Zinc oxide [44].

19. Two of the 16 main ingredients used in OTC sunblock products are safe, the FDA said. Moreover, the FDA is requesting more information on 12 ingredients among the 16 [45].

20. The FDA has changed its guidelines to address broad-spectrum sunscreen use, which involves UVA and UVB coverage; water resistance, to indicate the time dura-tion the sunscreen is effective; and sun protection fac-tor (SPF). SPF-15 or higher is recommended and can be labeled as reducing the risk of skin cancer and early skin aging [40].

21. PABA and trolamine salicylate-are not GRASE for use in sunscreens, are no longer permitted for use in OTC

sunscreen products. No sunscreens sold in the United States contain PABA or trolamine salicylate [41,42].

22. For a decade, Environmental Working Group (EWG) has worked to raise concerns about sunscreens with oxybenzone, which is found in nearly all Americans, de-tected in breast milk and potentially causing endocrine disruption [43].

23. Hawaii recently enacted legislation that will ban the use of two major ingredients -oxybenzone and octinoxate-that have also been implicated in coral toxicity and will be banned. This creates a healthcare dilemma: Will the protection of coral reefs result in an increase in human skin cancers? [51].

Sunburn: Pathophysiology

Sunburn is a radiation copy to the skin brought about by an excess of exposure to the sun's UV beams or counterfeit sources, for example, tanning beds. Unending sun exposure creates premature cutaneous maturing, decreases insuscep-tible response to ecological pathogens, and increases the hazard for creating premalignant and harmful neoplasms [77]. The greatest hazard factors for sunburn is the measure of time the skin is presented to UV beams, in addition to the force. Numerous variables, for example, time of day, pre-scriptions, ozone exhaustion, high elevation, clear skies, and skin photo types impact sunburns [11]. Exposure to sun-based radiation has the helpful impacts of animating the cutaneous blend of nutrient D and giving brilliant warmth. Lamentably, when the skin is exposed to exorbitant radia-tion in the bright range, injurious impacts may happen. The most prominent is intense sunburn or sun-based erythema. At first, UVR causes vasodilation of cutaneous veins, result-ing in the trademark erythema. Inside 1 hour of UVR expo-sure, pole cells release preformed go between including his-tamine, serotonin, and tumor corruption factor, prompting prostaglandin and leukotriene combination. Inside 2 hours after UV exposure, harm to epidermal skin cells is seen. Ery-thema as a rule happens 3-4 hours after exposure, with pin-nacle levels at 24 hours [12]. Sunburns are reviewed as pink, red, and rankling. Conversely, warm consumes are reviewed by degree (first, second, and third), yet this arrangement ought not be connected to sunburns since warm consumes have very different sequelae, for example, scarring and pass-ing, which are extremely rare outcomes of sunburn. Kera-toconjunctivitis or visual sunburn can likewise be brought about by UV radiation, and it pursues a comparative time course [13]. Studies have demonstrated that UVA weakens the Antigen Presenting Cell (APC) movement of the epider-mal cells and thereby causes insusceptible suppression, along these lines adding to the development of skin malig-nancy [30]. In rundown, UVA radiation can cause atomic and mitochondrial DNA harm, quality transformations and skin malignancy, dysregulation of enzymatic chain reactions, safe suppression, lipid peroxidation (layer harm), and photoal-lergic and phototoxic impacts.




• of 25 •

On the sub-atomic dimension, exposure to UV radiation can result in a covalent joining of pyrimidine (generally thy-mine) dimers. DNA repair components, for example, nucleo-tide extraction repair, base extraction repair, or jumble re-pair qualities, don't recognize dimers, the transformations go uncorrected to the cell cycle. At the point when changed qualities reach the cell cycle, if not repaired by the accep-tance of the p53 pathway, a progression of changes can result in threatening change and immunosuppression. UV-incited immunosuppression adds to skin malignant growth because of harm to DNA and hindrance of protective system inside the skin (2). A common type of sun-related skin dam-age is actinic keratosis (AK). Age, Fitzpatrick skin type 1 or 2 (See exhibit 1), and UV light are the major risk factors for developing AK. Most AKs do not progress into invasive squa-mous cell carcinoma (SCC), but the risk is still present. The risk of malignant transformation of an AK to SCC within one year is approximately 1 in 1,000. However, approximately 60% of invasive SCCs of the skin probably arise from AKs. If not treated or protected against additional sun damage, AKs may eventually progress to invasive SCC. Avoiding sun exposure and daily application of sunscreen statistically de-creases the number of AKs [77]. (Figure 2) (Exhibit 1)

Figure 2. Mechanism of UV induced immunosuppression [130], [139-141]. UVR, in particular the UVB range, suppresses the immune system in several ways. UVB inhibits antigen presentation, induces the release of immunosuppressive cytokines and causes apoptosis of leukocytes. UVB, however, does not cause general immunosuppression but rather inhibits immune reactions in an antigen-specific fashion. Application of contact allergens onto UV-exposed skin does not cause sensitization but induces antigen-specific tolerance since such an individual cannot be sensitized against the very same allergen later, although sensitization against other allergens is not impaired. This specific immunosuppression is mediated by antigen-specific suppressor/ regulatory T cells. UVB-induced DNA damage is a major molecular trigger of UV-mediated immunosuppression. Reduc-tion of DNA damage mitigates UV-induced immunosuppression. Likewise, interleukin-12 which exhibits the capacity to reduce DNA damage can pre-vent UV-induced immunosuppression and even break tolerance. Presenta-

tion of the antigen by UV-damaged Langerhans cells in the lymph nodes appears to be an essential requirement for the development of regulatory T cells. Studies addressing the molecular mechanisms underlying UV-induced immunosuppression will contribute to a better understanding how UV acts as a pathogen but on the other hand can be also used as a therapeutic tool.

The finding of SCC has increased in the course of recent years. The most significant hazard factor for SCC is com-bined sun harm and age, the hazard was greatest in those with more than 30,000 hours of aggregate lifetime sun expo-sure. UVA, UVB, PUVA, and tanning beds have been appeared to increase the rate of cutaneous SCC. Prevention of SCC in-corporates assurance from the sun, including the utilization of protective garments and use of sunscreen. Basal Cell Car-cinoma (BCC) is the most widely recognized skin malignant growth and happens most frequently on the face and head. In Caucasians, the rate of BCC has consistently increased and the lifetime danger of creating BCC is 30% [86]. BCC emerges from the basal layer of epidermis and its extremi-ties. The most significant hazard factor is unending UVR. Other realized hazard factors incorporate reasonable skin, light eyes, red hair, endless arsenic exposure, helpful radia-tion, immunosuppression, basal cell nevus disorder, and dif-ferent other hereditary pre-manners. Essential prevention is security from sun exposure starting at an early age [77]. Other than UVR, exposure to arsenic, radiation, perpetual incendiary conditions in skin, and consumes, scars, diseases entanglements or even tattoos are additionally the contrib-uting components for BCC [96]. (Figure 3)

Figure 3. UVB response in melanoma [85]. UVB exposure triggers mac-rophage and neutrophil invasion into the skin. Upregulation of CCR2 and ATF2 in melanocytes advances recruitment of macrophages into the skin, which thus invigorates creation of CCL2, MMP-9, and IFN-γ in macrophages. IFN-γ motioning from macrophages advances a positive input circle among melanocytes and macrophages, in which melanocytes upregulate CCL8, a CCR2 ligand, and advance further recruitment of macrophages. The in-cendiary response created by macrophage and neutrophil recruitment ad-vances angiogenesis, just as melanoma cell attack, survival, and metastasis. UVB additionally freely regulates melanin generation and MC1R flagging. Acceptance of pigmentation qualities and resulting increase in melanin creation following UVB increases cell survival and NER, however decreases expansion and eventually, melanoma genesis. Motioning through MC1R is prompted by UVB and actuates DNA harm response. Motioning through αMSH and MC1R advances phosphorylation of ATM and ATR, upregulates XPC, and elevates XPA recruitment to invigorate NER. αMSH likewise initi-ates oxidative stress response qualities to reduce oxidative stress in mela-nocytes/melanoma. UVB-incited expression of IL-23 likewise actuates XPC and XPA to prompt NER. IL-23 flagging, melanin creation, and MC1R flag-ging would all be able to restrain melanoma genesis incited by UVB. Abbre-viation: Activating Transcription Factor 2 (ATF2); Chemokine (C-C theme) Receptor 2 (CCR2); Chemokine (C-C theme) Ligand 2 (CCL2); Matrix Me-talloproteinase-9 (MMP-9); type II Interferon (IFN-γ); Interleukin-23 (IL-




• of 25 •

Epidemiological examination reveals that every year in the United States alone, ~5 million skin malignant growth pa-tients are treated, and that somewhere in the range of 40 and half of Americans are defenseless to create skin disease in any event once by the age of 65 [96]. More than 90% of melanoma cases in the United States are credited to skin cell harm from UV radiation exposure. Skin malignancy is the most widely recognized type of disease, representing 40- half of all tumors analyzed in the US. Melanoma is the most genuine type of skin disease. Melanoma is responsible for the most skin malignancy passing’s, with around 9,000 people kicking the bucket from it every year [84]. Regard-less of early screening and location programs, the general death rate from melanoma has remained stable or keeps on rising. The rate of melanoma has dramatically multi-plied in the Caucasian populace in the United States in the course of recent years. An expected 60-70% of cutaneous dangerous melanomas are believed to be brought about by UV radiation exposure. Two kinds of UV radiation are basi-cally responsible for causing cancer-causing skin harm: UVA (315 nm-400 nm) and UVB (280 nm-315 nm) [85]. Seri-ous and irregular sun exposure at a youthful age increases a patient's danger of melanoma. People with five or more severe sunburns in youth or youthfulness have an expected twofold greater danger of creating melanoma. Melanoma is generally found on areas sporadically presented to UVR, for example, the back of the legs in ladies and the backs of men. UVB, UVA, and PUVA treatment all have been demonstrated to increase the danger of melanoma. Suitable UVR insurance decreases the danger of building up a melanoma or having an auxiliary melanoma. Studies show that decreasing recre-ational sun exposure following the conclusion of essential melanoma can altogether decrease the opportunity of build-ing up a second melanoma [77].

Photoaging

Each organ experience maturing in different ways. Skin ma-turing can be sorted into three gatherings, inherent, photo-graph, and hormonal maturing. The results of photograph maturing are typically portrayed by morphological changes including wrinkle arrangement or by histological changes in connective tissues. So as to create more wrinkles, vas-culature structures are expected to create. Various reports recommended that angiogenesis assumes a critical job in initiating wrinkle arrangement in photograph harmed skin [142]. Among unsafe ecological elements that add to out-ward maturing, long haul impacts of repeated exposure to bright light are the most noteworthy and are referred to as photoaging. Premature skin maturing and improvement of harmful cutaneous tumors, melanoma and non-melanoma, are interrelated issues that are increasingly significant is-sues in the field of dermatology. Skin maturing is significant stylishly, whereas skin malignant growth is a direct threat to the wellbeing of the patient [143]. Photoaging is a mul-

23); Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER); Melanocortin 1 Receptor (MC1R); Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated quality (ATM); α-Melanocyte-Stimulating Hormone (αMSH); Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR); Xeroder-ma Pigmentosum Group C (XPC); Xeroderma Pigmentosum bunch A (XPA).

tisystem degenerative procedure that includes the skin and skin emotionally supportive network. It is a combined procedure and depends fundamentally on the degree of sun exposure and skin color. The epidermis and dermis are both influenced by UVB; however, the dermis is addition-ally influenced to a critical degree by UVA. It has for quite some time been felt that most of human photograph sores due to UVB beams, presently it is trusted that UVA assume a considerable job in photoaging. Photoaging influences the sun-uncovered areas and is described clinically by fine and coarse wrinkling, unpleasantness, dryness, laxity, telangiec-tasia, loss of rigidity and pigmentary changes [144]. These progressions are more severe in people with reasonable skin and are additionally impacted by individual ethnicity and hereditary qualities. Photoaging might be prevented and treated with an assortment of modalities, including topical retinoids, cosmeceuticals, chemical strips, injectable neuromodulators, delicate tissue fillers, and light sources [145]. There is likewise an increase being developed of be-nevolent and harmful neoplasms on photoaged skin. Amid the years the progress has been made in understanding the photoaging in human skin. UV irradiation conjures an intri-cate grouping of explicit sub-atomic responses that harm skin connective tissue [146]. In severely harmed skin, there is loss of epidermal extremity (precise development) and in-dividual keratinocytes may indicate atypia, particularly the lower epidermal layers. More significant changes happen in the dermis, where photodamage is portrayed by degenera-tion of collagen and affidavit of unusual elastotic material, reflected by wrinkles, wrinkles, and yellow staining of the skin. The greater the photodamage, the more the collection of thickened, tangled and corrupted versatile strands [153]. The use of topical development factors subsequent to micro needling can be valuable to reduce visual indications of fa-cial photoaging by improving skin texture and limiting the presence of scarcely discernible differences and wrinkles [151]. Among retinoids, tretinoin is the most intense and best-contemplated retinoid. Be that as it may, its distur-bance potential has incited dermatologists to change over to less bothering however equivalently viable retinoids like adapalene and somewhat retinol and retinaldehyde [154]. Bakuchiol (useful simple of topical retinoids, as the two mixes have been appeared to prompt comparable quality expression in the skin) is a phytochemical that has shown cutaneous antiaging impacts when connected topically. Ba-kuchiol is promising as a more mediocre option in contrast to retinol [152]. (Figure 4) (Exhibit 3& 4)




• of 25 •

Sunburn Home Remedies and Treatment

Certain medical treatments have been tried and studied to treat sunburn. However, in general, most remedies have not shown any clinically proven benefit as far as speeding the recovery or reversing the damage. Therefore, most of the treatments available are only used to treat symptoms.

1. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): Sys-temic and topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, when used at dosages to achieve optimal serum levels for anti-inflammatory effect, only result in an early and mild reduction of ultraviolet B-induced erythema [15]. In oral (ibuprofen, Motrin, Naprosyn, Advil etc.) or topi-cal diclofenac 0.1% gel (Solaraze) forms have shown to reduce redness if applied before or immediately after UVB exposure. This benefit may be diminished after 24 hours. These medications may also help relieve the symptoms of sunburn such as pain and discomfort [4].

2. Topical steroid creams have not shown any significant improvement in sunburn symptoms. Oral steroids such as prednisone have not proven to be beneficial and have been associated with some significant side effects. Treatment with topical moderate-potency or high-po-tency corticosteroids does not provide a clinically useful decrease in the acute sunburn reaction when applied 6 or 23 hours after UV exposure [16].

3. Applying Aloe Vera gel: Topical application of Aloe Vera is not an effective prevention for radiation-induced inju-ries and has no sunburn or suntan protection [17]. The Aloe Vera cream was continuing applied at the test sites twice daily for the next three weeks. The results showed no sunburn or suntan protection and no efficacy in sun-burn treatment when compared to placebo. The Aloe Vera cream has no bleaching effect too. However, this may be beneficial in treating the symptoms [18].

4. Topical anesthetics: Advertised remedies such as topi-

Figure 4. Mechanisms of Photoaging and Chronological Skin Aging [143], [147-150]. Photodamaged skin displays variable epidermal thick-ness, dermal elastosis, decreased/fragmented collagen, increased matrix-degrading metalloproteinases, inflammatory infiltrates and vessel ectasia. The main effects of acute and chronic exposure to UV radiation are DNA damage, inflammation and immunosuppression. These effects are direct as well as indirect due to ROS production. The ROS are particularly harm-ful in that they destabilize other molecules and promote chain reactions that damage biomolecules rapidly, such as telomere shortening and dete-rioration, mitochondrial damage, membrane degradation and oxidation of structural and enzymatic proteins. Collagen and elastin are the structural proteins of the ECM. The deterioration/remodelling of the collagen and elastin fibers facilitates angiogenesis and metastasis, and the damaged col-lagen and elastin proteins serve as additional sensitizers of photooxidative stress. Accumulation of collagen fragments, which occurs with chronic UV exposure and the passage of time, impairs the mechanical and functional properties of the dermal extracellular matrix. Elastic fibres, such as oxyta-lan fibres in papillary dermis, are associated with not only skin resilience, but also skin surface texture, and elastic fibre formation by fibroblasts is facilitated by increased expression of fibulin-5. Thus, induction of fibulin-5 expression is a damage-repair mechanism, and fibulin-5 is an early marker of photoaged skin.

cal anesthetics (benzocaine) may help with symptoms of sunburn, however, very little clinical data is available to substantiate their effectiveness. LMX is a topical lipo-somal formulation containing 4% or 5% lidocaine. LMX 4% is available OTC and is FDA-approved for temporary relief of pain and itching associated with minor cuts, mi-nor burns, sunburn, and insect bites [19].

5. Vitamin D Preparations: Vitamin D enables anti-in-flammation to promote tissue repair in response to injury. Mechanistically, vitamin D signaling activated M2-autophagy regulators Kruppel Like Factor 4 (KLF4), Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor Gamma (PPARG), and arginase 1. Analysis of UV-exposed human skin biopsies detected a similar increase in macrophage autophagy following vitamin D intervention, identifying an essential role for autophagy in vitamin D-mediated protection of skin from UV damage [25].

6. Sunscreens: Sunscreens represent a practical approach to photoprotection for skin. The importance of begin-ning sun protection at a young age cannot be overstat-ed. In humans, the regular use of sunscreens has been shown to reduce AKs, solar elastosis, UV-induced im-munosuppression, and photo sensitivities. Sunscreens also prevent the formation of SCCs in animals. A thor-ough understanding of the mechanism of action of sun-screens, different sunscreen vehicle choices, and ad-verse effects can help educate patients on their choice of sunscreens [77]. (Figure 5)

Figure 5. The Effect of Oral Vitamin D3 Intervention on Skin Inflam-mation [26]. As depicted in panel A, levels of vitamin D3 are at baseline levels in the absence of high dose oral vitamin D3 intervention. In this con-text, exposure to erythemogenic doses of UVR results in sunburn and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the skin, includ-ing TNF-α** and iNOS*, which further propagate tissue inflammation. In-creased skin redness and thickness are mediated by vasodilation, an influx of inflammatory cells, and vascular congestion within the skin. The gene expression profile of skin at this time is characterized by increased expres-sion of various pro-inflammatory genes. As depicted in panel B, levels of vitamin D3 rapidly rise within the serum after high dose oral vitamin D3 intervention. Arginase-1 is up regulated within the skin, and production of the pro-inflammatory mediator’s TNF-α and iNOS are attenuated after sunburn. Reduced skin erythema and thickness are observed clinically. The




• of 25 •

Medication responsible for increase skin sensitivity to

sunlight

A large number of medications are known to increase skin sensitivity to sunlight and are called photosensitive drugs or medications. Photo-sensitizing chemicals usually have a low molecular weight (200 to 500 Daltons) and are planar, tricy-clic, or polycyclic configurations, often with heteroatoms in their structures enabling resonance stabilization. All absorb UV and/or visible radiation, a characteristic that is essential for the chemical to be regarded as a photosensitizer. Some of the common ones include:

1. NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs)

2. Antibiotics: Tetracyclines (tetracycline, doxycycline [Vibramycin]), Quinolone (ciprofloxacin [Cipro], levo-floxacin [Levaquin]), Sulfonamides (sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim; cotrimoxazole [Bactrim, Septra], sulfamethoxazole [Gantanol]).

3. Diuretics (water pills): thiazides (hydrochlorothia-zide [Hydrodiuril], furosemide [Lasix])

4. Cardiac medications: amiodarone (Cordarone), quini-dine

5. Diabetes drugs: sulfonylureas such as chlorpropamide (Diabinese), glyburide (Micronase, DiaBeta, Glynase)

6. Psychiatric drugs: chlorpromazine (Thorazine), tricy-clic antidepressants such as desipramine (Norpramin) and imipramine (Tofranil)

7. Acne medications: isotretinoin (Accutane) [20-24], [34]. (Figure 6) (Exhibit 5& 6)

gene expression profile of skin at this time is characterized by increased expression of skin barrier genes, which help to repair the epidermal bar-rier and attenuate the inflammatory insult. *iNOS is the synthase isoform most commonly associated with malignant disease. ** TNF-α is a primary cytokine that can be induced in keratinocytes and in dermal fibroblasts by UVB, synthesized in adipose tissue by adipocytes and other cells in the tis-sue matrix. TNF-α is mainly secreted by activated macrophages immedi-ately postburn. The host immune response is activated by TNF-α, as is the subsequent release of cytokines following trauma and infection.

Figure 6. Use of Sun Protective [178]. Public guidelines for sun protection have been updated as stakeholders warn that Australians are using sunscreen as a “suit of armour”. Heather Walker, chair of Cancer Council Australia’s National Skin Cancer Committee, said that recent research shows 85% of people do not apply sunscreen correctly. The Australasian College of Dermatologists and Cancer Council updated the guidelines following concerns that many Australians only use sunscreen to protect their skin. By not using clothing, a broad-brimmed hat, shade, sunglasses and sunscreen correctly when the ultraviolet index reaches three or above, they are putting themselves at risk, the organizations say.

Tanning/Pigmentation with or without Sun Exposure

Some Africans and Asians maintain a strategic distance from sun and use dying items to help skin, while numerous Cau-casians look for the sun for tanning to accomplish a bronze skin to "look great." UV radiation from the sun or from fake sources increases skin pigmentation. Daylight and indoor UV initiated tanning is a typical conduct, particularly among youths, youthful grown-ups, and people with lighter skin. A few medical advantage claims, for example, improved ap-pearance, upgraded state of mind, and increased nutrient D levels have been credited to tanning. The Indoor Tanning Association asserts that a base tan can go about as "the body's common insurance against sunburn. Sunless tanning items may fill in as a reasonable, more secure option for the individuals who desire tanned skin [155]. There are three periods of tanning: quick shade obscuring (IPD), persever-ing color obscuring (PPD) and postponed tanning (DT). IPD happens amid the principal minutes of exposure to UVA, and after that blurs inside couple of hours. PPD shows up inside long stretches of higher portions of UVA exposure and per-severe as long as a few days or weeks. DT creates over 3-7 days after UVB exposure, and afterward remains for quite a long time. The systems of UVA-and UVB-actuated pigmenta-tion are different. UVA prompts IPD and PPD through oxida-tion of pre-existing melanin or melanogenic precursors. IPD is oxygen subordinate, and reactive oxygen radicals are con-sidered to be responsible for this procedure. PPD is likewise because of the upward development of melanosomes to-ward the outside of the skin. People with lightest (skin type I) do nearly not tan, while IPD and PPD are most grounded in respectably and hazily pigmented skin. DT results from union of melanin in the melanocytes, trailed by melanin dis-semination to neighboring keratinocytes [156]. UVA (320- 400 nm) causes prompt shade obscuring (IPD) just as perse-vering color obscuring (PPD) of skin inside hours by means of photooxidation as well as polymerization of existing mel-anin or melanogenic precursors because of the age of reac-tive oxygen species interestingly, UVB (280-320 nm) insti-gates a slower yet more steady sort of pigmentation named postponed tanning (DT) which requires the increased blend of melanin following the incitement of tyrosinase movement and the entire melanogenic course [157]. UVB-incited DT is photoprotective (it is assessed to have a SPF of 3)- while DT actuated by UVA isn't considered to be photoprotective. DT is maximal from 10 days to 3 a month, contingent upon the UV portion and the person's skin shading. It might take a little while or months for the skin to return to its base constitu-tive shading. UVA-initiated DT is 2-3 requests of extent less effective per unit portion than UVB and has a prior begin-




• of 25 •

ning, frequently directly after IPD [158]. The IPD technique can likewise be utilized as a suitable endpoint in the assur-ance of UVA insurance. It is efficient, and therefore impres-sively brings down the danger of UV exposure, especially when testing sunscreen items with higher UVAPF [159]. IPD ordinarily seems dim to dark while PPD is darker. Both IPD and PPD don't require any new shade blend and are thought to result from oxidation and additionally polymerization of pre-existing melanin or melanogenic precursors and me-tabolites. Melanosomes have likewise been appeared to re-distribute inside both keratinocytes and melanocytes amid the IPD/PPD response. PPD isn't protective against neither UVB-prompted erythema nor UVB-incited DNA sores [160]. Exposure to bright radiation from indoor tanning gadget use is related with an increased danger of skin disease, including danger of threatening melanoma, and is a pressing general medical issue. By reducing indoor tanning, future instances of skin malignant growth could be prevented, alongside the related bleakness, mortality, and healthcare costs [175]. (Figure 7) (Exhibit 7& 8)

Figure 7. Give me a tan! - Megan Fox [176,177]. Megan Fox comes up the most when searching online for pale vs. tan photos. She demanded a sun bed be delivered to the set of Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, because she was feeling self-conscious about her pale skin, according to Fox News. But they didn't have one available so offered to send an expert to give Megan a customized spray tan. However, Megan turned down the offer, saying she wanted a sun bed instead.

The Sun Care Industry

The U.S. sun care market size was estimated at USD 1.95 bil-lion in 2016. The growing consumer awareness regarding the ill-effects of over exposure to Ultraviolet (UV) rays on the undefended skin is expected to propel growth. Further-more, rising utilization of organic sun care products owing to absence of synthetic chemicals in the formulation is ex-pected to drive growth over the forecast period. The sun-screen manufacturers are actively using these formulations as it increases the endurance of skin cells against UV rays and enhances the self-defense mechanism. Enhanced stan-dard of living coupled with increasing disposable income of the middle-class working population in economies of North America, including the U.S., is expected to propel sun care

market growth over the forecast period. The industry play-ers including L’Oréal are using nanotechnology by manipu-lating the materials at an atomic or molecular in order to en-hance the efficiency of the product. Over the past five years, the Sunscreen Manufacturing industry has grown by 1.6% to reach revenue of $407m in 2018. In the same timeframe, the number of businesses has grown by 3.9% and the num-ber of employees has grown by 1.5% [179,180].

Classification of sunscreens

Sunscreens are classically divided into physical or chemical sunscreens. Chemical sunscreen assimilates into the skin and afterward retains UV beams, changes over the beams into warmth, and releases them from the body. Physical blockers are inorganic and reflect, disperse, or potentially retain UVR. Physical UV absorbers like titanium dioxide and zinc oxide have been considered as very protective operators against UVR. ZnO and TiO2 mixes are especially important in light of their capacity to channel both UVA and UVB radia-tions, giving more extensive UVR insurance than that saw with individual part [95]. They are utilized in sunscreens as nanoparticles, which signifies a size <100 nm. The littler size of these mineral particles increases their restorative adequacy by clients as they are substantially less obvious after application. ZnO has an expansive UVA-UVB retention bend, while TiO2 gives better UVB insurance. In general, the human wellbeing dangers with inorganic channels are ex-tremely low given an absence of percutaneous ingestion; in any case, there is potential hazard when uncovered by means of inward breath, inciting recommendations against splash sunscreen items with nanoparticles [111]. UV-A beams in-tensely add to both premature skin aging and skin malig-nant growth, while UV-B beams cause sunburn. Henceforth, the utilization of sunscreen is unequivocally supported by numerous healthcare experts so as to limit or conceivably annihilate the unsafe impacts of UV beams on our skin, re-membering, that about 90% of all skin tumors are related with exposure to the sun's destructive radiation. Insurance against both UVB and UVA radiation is supported. Most sun-screens consolidate chemical UV retaining sunscreens and physical inorganic sunscreens, which reflect UV, to give wide range assurance. The correct utilization of sunscreens ought to be joined with the shirking of early afternoon sun and the wearing of protective attire and glasses, as a feature of a general sun assurance regimen [94,95]. Tragically, wrong data is currently wandering the media and the Internet re-garding the security, poisonous quality, and intense symp-toms of the dynamic ingredients currently utilized in sun-screens, therefore disheartening individuals from utilizing sunscreens [92]. Chemical sunscreens are natural and by and large sweet-smelling mixes conjugated with a carbonyl gathering. They are intended to ingest high-force UVR, pro-duce excitation to a higher vitality state, and, with the return to the ground state, result in transformation of the assimilat-ed vitality into a more extended, lower vitality wavelength. Chemical sunscreens can be characterized dependent on their bit of UV inclusion. Normally known ingredients for UVB sunscreen assurance are Padimate O, octinoxate, octi-




• of 25 •

salate, octocrylene, and ensulizole. Ordinarily realized Stud-ies reveal that Persistent Pigment Darkening (PPD) to be a steady end point inducible by all the UVA wavelengths, not influenced by fluence rate, for example a reliable endog-enous UVA dosimeter in the skin [89]. Issues related with chemical sunscreens are: (I) Requires around 20 minutes after application before it begins to work (ii) Chemical sun-screens may cause reactions, for example, erythema, edema, and disturbance (particularly for the individuals who have dry skin with a harmed moisture obstruction) because of the numerous ingredients joined so as to accomplish wide range UVA and UVB insurance (iii) The higher the SPF, (for exam-ple, equations of SPF 50 or greater), the higher the danger of bothering for touchy skin types (iv) The assurance it offers gets spent more immediately when in direct UV light, so re-application must be more frequent. (v) Increased possibility of redness for rosacea-inclined skin types since it changes UV beams into warmth which can worsen flushing (vi) May stop up pores for sleek skin types [93]. The significance of sufficient UVA insurance has turned out to be apparent in recent years. The United States and Europe have different principles for surveying UVA insurance in sunscreen items. Most of tried sunscreens offered sufficient UVA assurance as indicated by US Food and Drug Administration guidelines for expansive range status, however practically 50% of the sunscreens tried did not pass principles set in the European Union. UVA sunscreen ingredients are oxybenzone, meradi-mate, avobenzene, and tetraphthalydine dicamphor sulfonic corrosive [90,91]. Wide range is a term intended to mean in-surance from both UVA and UVB. Issues related with physi-cal sunscreens are: (I) Can rub off, sweat off and flush off effectively, which means more frequent re-application when outside as required (ii) The physical sunscreen operators give high darkness to the topical preparation, which makes the planned creams cosmetically unsatisfactory and leave a whitish layer on the skin, making a few equations contrary for medium to dull skin tones (iii) Can be less protective if not connected and re-connected liberally and precisely since UV light can get between the sunscreen particles and get into the skin [93]. There are not many reports accessible on the use of Polymeric Nanoparticles (NPs) of physical and chemi-cal sunscreen ingredients (titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, oc-tyl methoxycinnamate, oxybenzone, octocrylene, and luteo-lin on) to improve sun insurance adequacy. UV-engrossing specialists must gather inside the upper skin layers so as to give a thick light-retaining layer and certification water re-sistance. Fuse of cell reinforcements could give extra profit by rummaging free radicals. Common polyphenols are allur-ing in this respect, because of their potential movement as photoprotectans and cell reinforcements [95].

FDA approved sunscreen ingredients: Literature

Review

Aminobenzoic acid: Aminobenzoic corrosive is a Vitamin B Complex Member. The substance order of aminobenzoic corrosive is Vitamin B Complex Compounds. In 1943, p-ami-nobenzoic corrosive (PABA) was licensed. Red petrolatum

was utilized by the United States military as a sunblock amid World War II. The underlying mixes were basically bright B radiation (UVB) blockers as it was at fault for the most per-ceptible impact, sunburn [48]. At the point when presented to light, aminobenzoic corrosive (para-aminobenzoic corro-sive or PABA) retains UV light and produces overabundance vitality by means of a photochemical reaction that may make harm DNA. Since DNA abandons add to skin malig-nant growth, aminobenzoic corrosive is never again broadly utilized in sunscreen plans. Aminobenzoic corrosive may likewise increase oxygen take-up at the tissue level and may improve Monoamine Oxidase (MAO) action to advance the debasement of serotonin, which in overabundance, may prompt fibrotic changes [46]. Aminobenzoates are the most powerful UVB safeguard yet don't retain UVA. Their utiliza-tion has declined because of para-aminobenzoic corrosive (PABA) affectability. PABA is an exceptionally viable UVB channel; be that as it may, it was reportedly the most widely recognized photo allergen and contact allergen [47]. (See also 5.1. Sunburn and Sunscreen Facts) (Figure 8)

Figure 8. p- aminobenzoic acid (PABA)

Avobenzone: UVA blockers, considered expansive range and have a high viability against UVA I (>380 nm); be that as it may, they are truly photo unstable and lose from half to 90% of their particles following 1 hour of UV exposure. It is ad-ditionally reported that they debase the UV channel octinox-ate [40], [59]. Avobenzone is the most broadly utilized UVA channel in sunscreen cream and it is inclined to corruption in the presence of daylight/UV radiation, they demonstrate a noteworthy skin infiltration [56]. 30% HPCD-Avobenzone framework was the most photostable after UVA exposure at different regimens and furthermore empowered photopro-tective productivity in vivo, prove by lower dimensions of sunburn cells and skin edema acceptance [60]. To beat the photograph shakiness of avobenzone, different photo sta-bilizers have been utilized as added substances, including cancer prevention agents, for example, nutrient C, nutrient E, and ubiquinone. The double job of glutathione as a skin brightening specialist and a photo stabilizer of avobenzone might be helpful for the advancement of multipurpose re-storative salves [49]. Avobenzone is dibenzoyl methane sub-ordinate. It is oil solvent crystalline strong [50], [58]. Meso-porous Silicas (MSs) containing avobenzone or oxybenzone adequately improved UVA-actuated skin disturbance and reduced the conceivable harmfulness evoked by percutane-ous infiltration [56]. Photosensitization by medications is an




• of 25 •

issue of increasing significance in current life. This marvel happens when a synthetic substance in the skin is presented to daylight. Photosensitizing drugs are reported to cause severe skin dermatitis, and surely, it is commonly encour-aged to abstain from sunbathing and to apply sunscreen. In this unique situation, the NSAID diclofenac is a photosensi-tive medication, particularly when administered in topical structure. avobenzone gives halfway photoprotection to diclofenac from photocyclization to carbazole subsidiaries [52]. Avobenzone is generally utilized in different individual care items, is present in pools, and is lethal to oceanic life forms. Avobenzone incites mitochondrial brokenness inter-vened apoptosis prompting irregular placentation amid ear-ly pregnancy [53]. Avobenzone was more temperamental/lethal than octyl p-methoxycinnamate (a natural UV-B chan-nel initially created during the 1950s, has been a standout amongst the most broadly utilized sunscreens for a consid-erable length of time) [54,55]. Octocrylene balances out avo-benzone, which is great, yet it is a known endocrine disrup-tor that additionally releases free radicals [57]. (Figure 9)

Figure 9. Avobenzone

Oxybenzone: Oxybenzone is a benzophenone subordinate utilized as a sunscreen specialist. Oxybenzone retains UVB and UVA II beams, resulting in a photochemical excitation and ingestion of vitality [116]. Oxybenzone (Benzophe-none-3) is a developing human and ecological contaminant utilized in sunscreens and individual care items to help limit the harming impacts of bright radiation. The Center for Dis-ease Control (CDC) fourth national report on human expo-sure to natural synthetic concoctions showed that around 97% of the general population tried have oxybenzone pres-ent in their pee, and free researchers have reported different focuses in conduits and fish around the world. Oxybenzone can likewise react with chlorine, creating dangerous results that can pack in pools and wastewater treatment plants. Moreover, antagonistic reactions could in all likelihood be increased by the shut circle of ingesting fish defiled with oxybenzone as well as washing the ingredient off our bodies and having it return in drinking water as treatment plants don't viably remove the compound as a major aspect of their preparing conventions. In people, oxybenzone has been re-ported to deliver contact and photo contact hypersensitivity reactions, actualized as a conceivable endocrine disruptor and has been connected to Hirschsprung's ailment. Eco-logically, oxybenzone has been appeared to create an assort-ment of dangerous reactions in coral and fish running from reef blanching to mortality [117]. (See also 5.1. Sunburn and Sunscreen Facts) (Figure 10)

Figure 10. Oxybenzone

Dioxybenzone: Dioxybenzone is an endorsed sunscreen in-gredient in focuses up to 3% [67]. The benzophenone sun-screens, octabenzone (UV-1) and dioxybenzone (UV-2) were found to show noteworthy chemo preventive movement against mouse skin carcinogenesis which correlated with their cancer prevention agent intensity [63]. In an investi-gation planned to qualify photograph wellbeing screening, benzophenone subordinates and ketoprofen showed huge Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) age upon exposure to reen-acted daylight, anyway ROS age from sulisobenzone and di-oxybenzone was irrelevant [68]. Polymerization with regu-lar polymer pullulan not just gives a long polymer spine to dioxybenzone, yet in addition keeps the separation between benzene rings of the dioxybenzone and prevents reduction of photo absorption power. UV/vis spectrophotometry af-firmed that dioxybenzone-pullulan polymer and dioxyben-zone exhibited comparable UV assimilation. Dioxybenzone demonstrated higher plasma focus after numerous applica-tions compared to that of dioxybenzone-pullulan polymer [64]. Chlorine is utilized as a substance disinfectant in pools. Its reactivity recommends sunscreen parts may be chlori-nated, modifying their absorptive as well as cytotoxic prop-erties. Chlorinated oxybenzone and dioxybenzone (caused fundamentally more cell demise than unchlorinated con-trols. Conversely, chlorination of sulisobenzone really re-duced cytotoxicity of the parent compound. Uncovering a monetarily accessible sunscreen item to chlorine likewise resulted in decreased UV absorbance, loss of UV assurance, and improved cytotoxicity [65]. Bromal hydrate was like-wise distinguished as one of the side-effects created by oxy-benzone and dioxybenzone, which is profoundly dangerous, the "positive halogen" properties of bromal hydrate are re-sponsible for its high poisonous quality [66]. Notwithstand-ing unfavorably susceptible reactions, concerns have been raised about the relative simplicity of which benzophenone is assimilated into the skin and may advance age of possibly destructive free radicals [69]. (Figure 11)

Figure 11. Dioxybenzone




• of 25 •

Cinoxate: Ester subordinates, for example, ethylhexyl me-thoxycinnamate (octinoxate), isoamyl p-methoxycinnamte (amiloxiate), octocrylene and cinoxate are utilized in cos-metics everywhere throughout the world as UV channels. In any case, their most extreme focuses in restorative items are restricted because of their unfavorable impacts, which incorporate contact and a photo contact hypersensitivity, phototoxic contact dermatitis, contact dermatitis, estrogen-ic balance and age of reactive oxygen species. 4-hydroxycin-namic corrosive, which is currently recorded as a skin-mold-ing cosmetics ingredient, has been broadly tried in vitro and in vivo as another medication contender for the treatment of hyperpigmentation [61]. Cinnamates have replaced PABA as the following most powerful UVB safeguard and incorporate octinoxate (OMC) and cinoxate (2-ethoxyethyl-methoxy-cinnamate). Cinoxate is less normally utilized [62]. Signifi-cant Key players with cinoxate are Major Key Players are Parchem (US), Carbosynth Limited (UK), Synchem UG and Co. KG(DE) [110]. (Figure 12)

Figure 12. Cinoxate

Octinoxate: Octinoxate (Octyl Methoxycinnamate, OMC) is a cinnamate ester and normal ingredient in sunscreen and other healthy skin items to limit DNA photodamage. It was initially created in 1950's as a natural UV-B channel that in-gests UV-B beams from sun. Usually joined with nanopar-ticles or other water-resistant liposomes in definitions to increase the confinement at the epidermis and decrease the danger of percutaneous retention [105]. OMC is the most regularly utilized UVB channel in the US. It isn't as strong an UVB safeguard as padimate O; therefore, other UVB safe-guards are utilized in blend to increase the SPF. OMC isn't truly photostable and corrupts in the presence of daylight after a brief timeframe. OMC is a strong UVB safeguard and is the most frequently utilized sunscreen ingredient. The ade-quacy of OMC can be additionally increased when embodied in polymethyl methacrylate microsphere [62]. Because of low water dissolvability (<1 mg/L), OMC is appropriate for most waterproof sunscreen plans [106]. Hawaii legislature passed a bill that outlaws items that contain Oxybenzone and OMC, viable January 2021. The bill depends on concen-trates that demonstrate that oxybenzone may hurt coral hatchlings and that the two mixes may "fade" coral, making it lose advantageous green growth [107-109]. OMC has been identified in human pee, blood and breast milk, which dem-onstrates that people are foundationally presented to this compound. OMC is an endocrine disruptor that copies estro-gen and can upset thyroid capacity [112,113]. (Figure 13)

Figure 13. Octinoxate

Homosalate: Homomenthyl salicylate or 3,3,5-Trimethylcy-clohexyl Salicylate. After topical use of gel, the bioavailabil-ity of HMS was 5.4 ± 1.1 and 4.2 ± 0.6% for high and low dos-ages (10 and 20 mg), respectively. Homosalate (HMS) is an UV separating specialist utilized in sunscreens and different cosmetics for skin assurance purposes. It is a gooey or light yellow to somewhat tan fluid or oil, gets from salicylic corro-sive [70,71]. Salicylates are powerless UVB safeguards and they are commonly utilized in blend with other UV channels. Both octisalate and homosalate are water insoluble that prompts their high substantivity, which is the capacity to retain its adequacy after exposure to water and sweat [72]. HMS does not have endocrine disruptor impacts on thyroid capacity and the pubertal improvement of female and male rodents [73]. Another examination says HMS is a potential endocrine disruptor and concentrates in cells propose it might affect hormones. Notwithstanding direct wellbeing concerns following homosalate exposure, the synthetic may likewise improve the assimilation of pesticides in the body [75]. Homosalate suppressed the ear edema response to dinitrobenzene, a conceivable component of activity of the salicylates is suppression of COX [114]. (Figure 14)

Figure 14. Homosalate (Homomenthyl salicylate)

Octisalate: Likewise, Ethylhexyl salicylate, a benzoate ester and an individual from phenols. It gets from a salicylic cor-rosive. Salicylates are more fragile UVB safeguards. It has an endorsed utilization dimension of 3 to 5% in both US and EU and is a decent solubilizer for benzophenone 3. In suntan salves, it is utilized as a preservative and antimicrobial. This salicylate salt is found in wintergreen leaves [115]. They have a long history of utilization however were displaced by the more effective PABA and cinnamate subsidiaries. They are commonly used to increase other UVB safeguards. With the trend to higher SPFs, more octisalate or octyl salicylate (ethylhexyl salicylate) is being utilized trailed by homo-salate or homomenthyl salicylate. The two materials can solubilize oxybenzone and avobenzone [97]. Both homo-salate and octisalate were found to suppress test immune system encephalomyelitis (EAE), a broadly utilized creature




• of 25 •

model of Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Accordingly, salates might be helpful new knowledge into systems of controlling im-mune system ailment [114]. (Figure 15)

Meradimate (Menthyl Anthranilate): Meradimate, be-fore known as menthyl anthranilate, is utilized in a maximal grouping of 5% in different items as an UV channel. It is cur-rently required to be named as meradimate in all FDA en-dorsed OTC items. Meradimate is affirmed by the FDA and Health Canada to be utilized as an ingredient in sunblock-ing items Meradimate is a monoterpenoid, an expansive range bright safeguard utilized as a concoction channel in business sunscreens [76]. A reasonably compelling UVA de-fender not allowed for use in Europe or Japan. Its protec-tive powerful activity does not cover totally the UVA beams as it just reaches 336 nm. This has been demonstrated de-spite the fact that meradimate has a theoretical protective inclusion run between 200-380 nm. Its capacity is related to the inherent structure of meradimate which is an ortho-disubstituted aminobenzoate. This structure permits simple electron delocalization and moves in the most extreme re-tention. Poor photoprotection reported by Rodrigues et al, 2018 settles on it a poor decision for a productive, useful sunscreen substance channel [76], [87,88]. (Figure 16)

Figure 15. Octisalate (Ethylhexyl salicylate)

Figure 16. Meradimate (Menthyl Anthranilate)

Octocrylene: 2-Ethylhexyl-2-cyano-3,3 diphenyl acrylate or octocrylene is synthetically related to cinnamates. It tends to be utilized to help SPF and improve water resistance in a given plan. Octocrylene is photostable and can improve the photostability of different sunscreens. It is costly and can present challenges in definition [97]. The ingestion profile of octocrylene ranges from 290 to 360 nm with pinnacle retention at 307 nm. The compound has a superb wellbe-ing profile with low aggravation, phototoxicity, and photoal-lergic potential. Octocrylene might be utilized in mix with other UV safeguards to accomplish higher SPF equations and to include soundness. [62]. Photostability refers to the capacity of an atom to remain unblemished with irradiation. Photostability is possibly an issue with all UV channels. This

issue been raised explicitly with avobenzone. This impact may corrupt different sunscreens in a detailing, including octyl methoxycinnamate. Octocrylene and a portion of the fresher sunscreens, including BEMT, settled avobenzone [97]. Chlorination reactions demonstrated that just octo-crylene was steady in chlorinated seawater [66]. UVA and UVB screening possibilities of octocrylene and zinc oxide details were compared in the 290-400 nm wavelength re-gion. Zinc oxide stacked SLN suspensions were observed to be more viable in the UVA region while octocrylene stacked ones performed better in the UVB region [98]. Octocrylene seems, by all accounts, to be a solid allergen prompting con-tact dermatitis in children and for the most part photoaller-gic contact dermatitis in grown-ups with a regularly related history of photo allergy from ketoprofen. Patients with pho-to allergy from ketoprofen frequently have positive photo patch test reactions to octocrylene. These patients should be educated regarding sunscreen items not containing octo-crylene, benzophenone-3, or aromas [99,100]. The clinical investigations demonstrate that octocrylene is both a photo contact allergen and a contact allergen [103]. Octocrylene's capacity to cause contact hypersensitivity is presumably owing to its reactivity towards lysine [101]. A reduction of the UV channel in the plan pressed in HDPE/LDPE material can happen after some time, reducing the protective impact of the item when connected to the skin [102]. Wide applica-tion in cosmetics prompts tainting of the oceanic condition, for the most part influences translation of qualities related to formative procedures in the mind and liver just as meta-bolic procedures in the liver (bioaccumulation think about in male zebrafish) [104]. (Figure 17)

Figure 17. Octocrylene (2-Ethylhexyl-2-cyano-3,3 diphenylacrylate)

Padimate O: Padimate An and Padimate O were acquainted as substitutes for PABA with reduce the quantity of reac-tions seen with PABA. Ethylhexyl dimethyl PABA is other-wise called padimate O, OD-PABA, or octyl dimethyl p-ami-nobenzoate. It is a gooey fluid will in general retain on the outside of the stratum corneum with little entrance. It has a low potential for sharpening. Ester subordinates of PABA turned out to be more mainstream with greater similarity in an assortment of more substantive vehicles and a lower potential for recoloring or unfavorable reactions. Padimate O is a functioning sunscreen specialist in cosmetics and over-the-counter sunscreen tranquilize items in focuses up to 8%, as regulated by the FDA. No bothering was reported when the two eyes are washed and left unattended. 5% eth-ylhexyl dimethyl PABA blended with mineral oil connected to rabbit skin did not cause disturbance and no skin sharp-ening in guinea pigs with the equivalent. High centraliza-




• of 25 •

tions of padimate O might be harmful to the epididymis and alert ought to be practiced while overseeing this substance to newborn children more youthful than a half year of age due absence of comprehension of its digestion and assimi-lation. It is generally utilized as an ingredient in numerous cosmetics at a normal convergence of 1.25% (0.5-2.0%) in Korea. It is harmful to the accompanying four organs: tes-tis, epididymis, spleen, and liver. Also, tests utilizing human keratinocytes found that ethylhexyl dimethyl PABA repress-es cell development and DNA combination at low focuses, and ended the cell cycle of threatening melanoma cell line (MM96L) at the G1 stage. As indicated by the EWG database, it is utilized in numerous items including lipstick, condition-er, cleanser, hostile to maturing operators, hair shower, and sunscreen. No huge reproductive poisonous quality, geno-toxicity, cancer-causing nature, skin refinement, skin aggra-vation, or phototoxicity was seen in response to Padimate O organization (restricted examinations there, requires fur-ther examinations) [97], [118,119]. (Figure 18)

Figure 18. Padimate O (Ethylhexyl dimethyl PABA

Ensulizole: 2-phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic corrosive/Phenylbenzimadazole sulfonic corrosive or ensulizole is a water-dissolvable UVB safeguard that can be utilized in the water period of emulsion frameworks. It is regularly found in corrective items and sunscreen recipes in blend with other UV channel mixes because of its negligible insur-ance against UV-A wavelengths, demonstrated to be utilized as an UV-B-retaining atom in sunscreen plans. rather than most oil-solvent sunscreen ingredients, taking into consid-eration a less-greasy, more tastefully satisfying detailing, for example, a day by day use cream containing sunscreen. Phenybenzimidazole sulfonic corrosive lifts the SPF of natu-ral and inorganic sunscreens. It can likewise be utilized in clear gels attributable to its water dissolvability. Because of its water solvency, ensulizole is regularly utilized in items defined to feel light and less slick. It was exhibited by con-centrates that ensulizole treatment gave assurance against cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and photosensitized the ar-rangement of oxidized guanine bases after UV-An or UV-B exposure. As indicated by the FDA, the maximal affirmed centralization of ensulizole is 148 mM despite the fact that fixations going somewhere in the range of 74 and 148mM can be found in business sunscreen items. Ensulizole is fit for producing reactive oxygen species, including singlet oxy-gen upon photoexcitation. In light of the discoveries in vitro and in cellulo, ensulizole initiates harm on the DNA, causes DNA strand breaks and photosensitizes the arrangement of oxidized guanines by means of sort I and II photosensitiza-tion systems following UV-An or UV-B irradiation [87], [120-125]. (Figure 19).

Figure 19. Ensulizole (Phenylbenzimadazole sulfonic acid)

Sulisobenzone: A benzophenone does not experience de-terioration to an inert structure on the off chance that it doesn't couple to target particles. Rather, it corrupts from the photograph energized state back to its underlying state, so it very well may be by and by photolyzed to a function-ing state. This procedure increases the probability that the benzophenone will couple to an objective particle amid the photoreaction. Benzophenones are utilized as photo initia-tors, scent enhancers, bright restoring operators, and, every so often, as flavor ingredients; they are additionally utilized in the manufacture of bug sprays, agrarian synthetic con-coctions, and pharmaceuticals and as an added substance for plastics, coatings, and glues. The UV-channel substance Sulisobenzone (BP-4) is generally utilized in sunscreens and other individual care items. Sulisobenzone is affirmed by the FDA in groupings of up to 10% and in Canada, is en-dorsed by Health Canada at similar focuses. It attempts to sift through both UVA and UVB beams, shielding the skin from sun UV harm. The benzophenones are a gathering of fragrant ketones that have both pharmaceutical and me-chanical applications. Benzophenones might be found natu-rally in organic products, for example, grapes, utilized prin-cipally as an UVA safeguard, yet helps SPF esteems in blend with other UVB safeguards. Sulisobenzone water solvent, to some degree unsteady, and utilized with less frequency. It can cause skin and eye disturbance. Does not infiltrate the skin to an expansive degree, however improves the capacity of different synthetic compounds to enter. wellbeing use in sunscreen is faulty [88], [126-130]. (Figure 20)

Figure 20. Sulisobenzone (benzophenone-4/BP-4)

Trolamine salicylate: Trolamine salicylate is a natural compound or a salt shaped among triethanolamine and sali-cylic corrosive. Triethanolamine kills the causticity of the salicylic corrosive. It is a topical pain relieving utilized for impermanent relief of minor torment related with joint in-flammation, basic spinal pain, muscle strains, sprains, and wounds. In contrast to other topical analgesics, trolamine salicylate has no particular smell which improves quiet worthiness. Trolamine or triethanolamine salicylate has




• of 25 •

great water dissolvability. It is for the most part utilized for water dissolvable sunscreens to help increase the SPF of a cosmetics inferable from their substantivity to the skin. It additionally shows low fundamental assimilation upon der-mal or topical organization and has low skin aggravation properties. Affirmed in both the US and Canada, trolamine salicylate is utilized in centralizations of up to 12%. It chan-nels UVB beams, yet has no impact on UVA beams, which im-plies it can't be relied on alone as a sunscreen. It has found to cause photo contact dermatitis [106], [131,132]. (See also 5.1. Sunburn and Sunscreen Facts) (Figure 21).

Figure 21. Trolamine sal,icylate

Titanium dioxide: TiO2 happens normally in three crys-talline structures: rutile, anatase, and brokite. Rutile is the most well-known and stable type of this shade. Significant optical properties of this birefringent precious stone are its refractive files in the UV and obvious wavelength go. The USP groups it as a topical protective. The assurance is fundamen-tally for its haziness because of high refractive file (2.7). In any case, the high refractive list isn't the main property that decides how well a substance squares light. The film thick-ness in which the substance is suspended just as the span of the individual particles additionally influences the adequa-cy of the sunscreen. Focal points offered by sunscreens de-pendent on inorganic mixes contain nonappearance of skin disturbance and refinement, latency of the ingredients, re-stricted skin infiltration, and an expansive range assurance. As a sun-based beam protective, it is utilized in a conc. 5% to 25% in treatments and moisturizers. Since it isn't con-sumed into the skin, this impact may not be an issue in topi-cal use on solid skin. It is likewise utilized as a white color in cosmetics and paints. As indicated by the US FDA, the in-surance factor against UVA ought to be something like 33% of the general sun assurance factor. Previously, TiO2 had a problematic corrective profile, seeming thick and white on application. Current details are micronized or nanoparticle definitions, which mix in with the skin tone and achieve bet-ter cosmesis. As small scale estimated TiO2 is the best in UVB and miniaturized scale measured ZnO in the UVA ex-tend, the mix of the two oxides assures the required wide band UV security. The molecule sizes that result, inside hu-man SC, in higher UV assimilation and dissipating and lower UV transmission improve the UV weakening. Emulsions are commonly precarious, regularly change from water– oil to oil– water or break down amid application on the skin, and may increase the cutaneous porousness. It has been shown that sunscreen TiO2 particles enter further into human skin from a slick than from a watery scattering. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has recently ordered TiO2 as an IARC bunch 2B cancer-causing agent, perhaps cancer-causing to people. The IARC ends depend on proof

appearing high groupings of shade grade and ultrafine TiO2 dust cause respiratory tract malignant growth in rodents. Natural cyto-and genotoxicity of both TiO2 and ZnO NPs (<100 nm) has been frequently reported. Covering the NPs reduces the dangerous impacts, particularly when silica-based coatings are utilized, yet can't totally prevent these impacts. TiO2, be that as it may, has currently pulled in more logical consideration than ZnO [40], [133,134].

Zinc oxide: Sunscreens containing metal oxide nanoparti-cles seem transparent on the skin and give amazing security against sunburn brought about by UV radiation. Zinc oxide is a generally utilized expansive range sunscreen, repeated utilization of ZnO-NPs to the skin, as utilized in worldwide sunscreen items, gives off an impression of being protected, with no proof of ZnO-NP entrance into the feasible epider-mis nor danger in the hidden suitable epidermis. It was related with the release and entrance of zinc particles into the skin; however, this did not seem to cause nearby lethal-ity. In the previous two decades, ZnO NPs have turned out to be a standout amongst the most prevalent metal oxide nanoparticles in organic applications because of their great biocompatibility, monetary, and low poisonous quality. ZnO NPs have risen a promising potential in biomedicine, par-ticularly in the fields of anticancer and antibacterial fields, which are included with their powerful capacity to trigger overabundance ROS generation, release zinc particles, and instigate cell apoptosis. Furthermore, ZnO NPs have preva-lent antibacterial, antimicrobial, and fantastic UV-blocking properties. ZnO NPs-uncovered HepG2 cells presented high-er cytotoxicity and genotoxicity, which were related with cell apoptosis interceded by the ROS triggered mitochondri-al pathway. In the cerebrum, the oxidative stress and aggra-vation reaction were found after ZnO NP exposure and more remarkable changes were recognized in matured person. These sorts of neurotoxicity may because of the demolition of the BBB uprightness caused incompletely by ZnO NPs-initiated fundamental aggravation [135-138].

Sunscreen Formulation

On the surface, sunscreen products are pretty simple. They consist of a delivery vehicle containing one or more sun-screen active ingredients. When applied to the skin, these sunscreen actives intercept solar UV rays before they can damage the underlying skin. However, while conceptually simple, a detailed analysis reveals that sunscreen formula-tions are quite complex, requiring careful selection of sun-screen active and vehicle components to control multiple performance and in-use parameters [164]. (Exhibit 9)

Alpha-Tocopherol (Filtrosol) has numerous protective ac-tivities, for example, decreasing immunosuppression, ery-thema, photoaging, and photo carcinogenesis [40]. Normally happening nutrient E is anything but a solitary compound; rather, nutrient E is a gathering of particles with related structures, some of which may have novel properties in skin. After topical application, nutrient E gathers in cell layers as well as in the extracellular lipid grid of the stratum corneum,




• of 25 •

where nutrient E adds to cancer prevention agent guards. Be that as it may, a lot of a topically connected portion of nutrient E alone will be devastated in the skin following ex-posure to UV light. This recommends in spite of the fact that nutrient E is filling in as a cancer prevention agent, it is inse-cure all alone and effectively lost from the skin. Along these lines, improving the steadiness of topical applications with nutrient E is significant [165]. Methyl Cellulose (Methyles-ter of cellulose) is utilized as an emulsifying, suspending and thickening operator in cosmetics, pharmaceutics and the substance industry. It's a non-ionic polymer, is profoundly hydrophilic and along these lines effectively dissolves in cold and heated water [166]. Ethyl liquor is antimicrobial preservative; disinfectant; skin penetrant; dissolvable. Cetyl and cetearyl are both gotten from coconut and are greasy al-cohols. Regularly, greasy alcohols are utilized as emollients and thickeners in healthy skin items. Greasy alcohols are not bothering and, truth be told, can be valuable for dry skin. On the off chance that LMW alcohols are high up on the ingre-dients list on a container of sunscreen then they are going to dry out skin. Be that as it may, Topical use of 10% ethanol animates the multiplication of peritoneal tissue explants-a semi in-vivo wound model-which can be interpreted as pos-itive impact for incitement of twisted recuperating by eth-anol [167,168]. Oleyl liquor is primarily utilized in topical pharmaceutical details and is for the most part regarded as a nontoxic and nonirritant material at the dimensions utilized as an excipient. Be that as it may, contact dermatitis due to oleyl liquor has been reported. It's an antifoaming specialist; disintegration enhancer; emollient; emulsifying operator; skin penetrant; continued release specialist. SD liquor 40 is a kind of denatured liquor utilized in cosmetics and individ-ual care items as an enemy of frothing specialist, astringent, antimicrobial operator, and a dissolvable. Notwithstanding SD liquor 40, the uniquely denatured alcohols worthy for use in cosmetics are SD Alcohol 23-An and SD Alcohol 40-B. As an astringent, SD liquor 40 makes organic tissue contract or draw together. After topical application, astringents take a shot at proteins called keratins, which capacity to hold skin cells together to shape a boundary. The bonds between keratins are influenced by temperature and pH, framing just when skin is somewhat acidic or cool. On the off chance that the securities break, the keratin atoms will isolate, making the external layer of skin swell. Astringents cool the skin and cause the bonds to reform. It is this procedure that creates the impermanent conditioning impact related with astrin-gents [169]. 2-Ethoxyethyl-p-Methoxycinnamate (Giv Tan® F/Cinoxate) utilized as sunscreen. The most widely recog-nized saturating ingredients are occlusive specialists which create an obstruction that squares water from getting away from the skin. Ingredients like Petrolatum, Mineral Oil and Dimethicone would all be able to be utilized as occlusive specialists. Humectants, which are ingredients that draw in water, are additionally added to salves. Glycerin is the most normally utilized humectant. At long last, emollients are added to improve the vibe of the moisturizer on the skin. They can reduce the shabbiness and greasiness brought about by the other saturating ingredients. Basic emollients incorporate coconut oil, cetyl esters, and certain silicones.

Sunscreen plans are normally slenderer in thickness than standard skin moisturizers [170]. (Exhibit 10)

Morin is a yellow chemical compound that can be isolated from Maclura pomifera (Osage orange), Maclura tinctoria (old fustic) and from leaves of Psidium guajava (common guava) [161]. It is a pentahydroxy flavone that is 7-hydroxy-flavonol bearing three extra hydroxy substituents at posi-tions 2' 4' and 5. It has a job as a cancer prevention agent, a metabolite, an antihypertensive operator, a hepatoprotec-tive specialist, a neuroprotective operator, a calming opera-tor, an antineoplastic specialist, an antibacterial operator, an EC 5.99.1.2 (DNA topoisomerase) inhibitor and an an-giogenesis balancing specialist. It is a pentahydroxy flavone and a 7-hydroxyflavonol [162]. ZnO and TiO2 blends are especially significant on account of their capacity to chan-nel both UVA and UVB radiations, giving more extensive UVR insurance than that saw with individual segment [95]. In 2018, the EWG reported that a vast increase in these in-organic channels with ~41% of sunscreens in the United States assigned as mineral as it were. This figure has dra-matically increased (from 17%) since 2007 [111]. Just two sunscreen dynamic ingredients endorsed in the US, avo-benzone (butylmethoxydibenzoylmethane) and zinc oxide (ZnO), give genuine expansive range assurance against UVA wavelengths >360 nm. Albeit powerful against shorter UVR wavelengths <360 nm, titanium dioxide TiO2 is additionally often accepted to present expansive range insurance and is substituted for ZnO or avobenzone. Utilization of appropri-ate detailing procedures can ensure that avobenzone mis-fortunes are limited to the degree that they have no effect on an item's capacity to convey continued insurance, even over times of delayed exposure to UVR [163]. (Figure 22).

Figure 22. Colorful reefs are a major draw for tourists. But chemicals in sun-screen and ocean warming pose serious threats to them [183]. Studies have shown that oxybenzone and octinoxate are found in over 3,500 sunscreen products, including household names like Tropicana, Banana Boat, and Cop-pertone. When corals absorb these chemicals, they have a similar reaction as they would if surrounding water temperatures were to get too warm. In ad-dition, the presence of these chemicals in sea water allows viruses to thrive, putting corals at high risk of catching an infection that could lead to bleaching and death.




• of 25 •

Sunscreen Vs Coral Reef

While covering under 1% of the sea surface, coral reefs give territory to almost 33% of marine fish species just as 10% of all fish captured for human utilization. Coral reefs likewise give real fundamental advantages to individuals, similar to sustenance generation, the travel industry, bio-technology improvement, and waterfront security. There is solid proof that some sunscreen ingredients, particularly oxybenzone, are destructive to corals if the focus in water is high. In certain circumstances, essentially related to the quantity of swimmers and the topography of the shoreline, centralizations of oxybenzone far surpass the dimensions appeared to be unsafe to corals [181]. In 2015, the nonprofit Haereticus Environmental Laboratory reviewed Trunk Bay shoreline on St. John, where guests extended from 2,000 to 5,000 swimmers’ day by day, and assessed more than 6,000 pounds of sunscreen was stored on the reef every year. That year, it found a normal of 412 pounds of sunscreen was kept every day on the reef at Hanauma Bay, a famous swimming goal in Oahu (Hawaii) that draws a normal of 2,600 swim-mers every day. In the course of recent years, one-fifth of the world's coral reefs have vanished-and there is a developing awareness that sunscreen is assuming a job. From 6,000 to 14,000 tons of sunscreen slide off of people into coral reef areas every year, uncovering the beautiful submerged envi-ronments to synthetic compounds that can slaughter them. A worldwide temperature alteration is the fundamental rea-son that coral reefs are kicking the bucket-yet sunscreens assume a job, too [182]. Danovaro et al, 2008 revealed that sunscreens, by advancing viral disease, conceivably assume a significant job in coral fading in areas inclined to elevated amounts of recreational use by people. Coral dying impact sly affects biodiversity and working of reef environments and their creation of merchandise and ventures. This in-creasing overall wonder is related with temperature oddi-ties, high irradiance, contamination, and bacterial illnesses. Hard-coral fading and the increase in viral plenitude in sea-water were likewise observed after coral treatment with mi-tomycin C, an anti-infection regularly used to incite the lytic cycle in inert viral contaminations [184]. Sadly, the World Conservation Institute appraises that 20% of coral reefs are already wrecked, another 25% are in great quick threat, and another 25% will be threatened by 2050 [185].

Epilogue

The skin stratum corneum goes about as a hindrance that confines the creature from the earth and maintains a stra-tegic distance from water misfortune from tissues. Such a fixed sheath is fundamental for the physiological procedures of the skin and of the entire body, however presents issues for the topical conveyance of substances to the tissues. This sort of deterrent has been known since old occasions and has been experimentally drawn nearer, e.g., by the utiliza-tion of greasy or sleek materials in healthy skin applications. Innovative accomplishments in the topical organizations of medicaments and in healthy skin items have prompted the

improvement of vehicles and entrance enhancer and to the plan of mechanically advanced definitions. Albeit engineered substance structures have been inexhaustibly utilized in this field, conventional practices and logical examinations have appeared during that time that herbal sources can give a wide range of components to vehiculating medications and dynamic mixes and for upgrading their penetration through the skin. There is wide inconstancy in value, SPF insurance, and item asserts among industrially accessible sunscreens. Restorative style is a standout amongst the most significant positive features, trailed by item execution. Dermatologists should direct patients that sunscreen items accompany various showcasing claims and fluctuating corrective rel-evance, which must all be offset with sufficient photoprotec-tion. Also, customers ought to be encouraged to choose an item with expansive range inclusion, a SPF of 30 or higher, and water and additionally sweat resistance in the setting of water exercises or high encompassing temperatures. UV channels are dissected in their pure structure by ingredient providers and furthermore by restorative organizations that buy those channels for joining into their completed items. When these UV channels are incorporated into restorative completed items, they likewise should be dissected for both quality control and regulatory consistence. Utilization of sun screening operators is helpful in limiting the occurrence of skin malignancies in individuals with reasonable skin. Be that as it may, a similar impact on Asian skin is begging to be proven wrong, as this skin type is considered to be resistant to skin malignant growths. Sunscreen utilize is prudent in youthful grown-ups to prevent and limit other photodamag-ing impacts. Reasonableness and appropriate application procedures are the difficulties that must be addressed so as to accomplish regular sunscreen utilization.

Article Summary

Advancing sunscreen use is a necessary piece of preven-tion programs went for reducing UV radiation-initiated skin harm and skin malignant growths. Insurance against both UVB and UVA radiation is pushed. Notwithstand-ing the endeavors of doctors and regulatory specialists to spread awareness regarding sunburn, skin disease, and the advantages of regularly utilizing sun screening operators, treatment adherence is low. Giving cosmetically worthy preparations and teaching individuals about adhering to the application directions, is a test often looked by treating doc-tors. Estimating sunscreens reasonably and making them water resistant and non-sticky are a couple of the difficulties looked by manufacturers. Manufacturers should likewise think about refinement reactions, particularly in those hav-ing skin inflammation or photograph dermatoses. Sun as-surance factor (SPF) is influenced by application thickness, water resistance and different variables. A sufficient SPF for an individual ought to be adjusted to skin phenotype and exposure propensities. The correct utilization of sunscreens ought to be joined with the shirking of early afternoon sun and the wearing of defensive apparel and glasses, as a fea-ture of a general sun security regimen. The FDA affirmed sunscreen ingredients are broadly reviewed. An unmistak-




• of 25 •

able and clear recommendation on their security adequacy still remains a major challenge.

Acknowledgement

I’m thankful to Dr. B.R. Naveen Kumar, Global Medical Af-fairs, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd., Hyderabad, India for his precious time to review my article and given his thoughtful suggestions. I’m also grateful to seminar library of Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Dhaka and BANSDOC Library, Bangladesh for providing me books, journal and newslet-ters. The greatest help was from students and colleagues who continually supported me in collection and data extrac-tion from books, journals, newsletters and precious time in discussion followed by providing information on different types of cosmetics in use. A portion of this article is long been lectured as course material. So, it is very much helpful for me to deliver better than before as many more things are studied.

References1. Budzowski A. Sunburn vs Sun Poisoning, Web UPMC

MyHealth Matters. [Crossref]

2. Moan J, Grigalavicius M, Dahlback A, Baturaite Z, Juze-niene A (2014) Ultraviolet-radiation and health: opti-mal time for sun exposure. Adv Exp Med Biol. 810:423-428. [Crossref]

3. MedicineNet. Sunburn (Sun Poisoning) Symptoms, Pain Relief, and Healing Time Center, medically Reviewed on 4/10/2018. [Crossref]

4. MedicineNet. Get Rid of Sunburn Fast: Pain Relief, Blisters,Peeling, Home Remedies, May 11, 2012. [Cross-ref]

5. Koh D, Wang H, Lee J, Chia KS, Lee HP, et al. (2003) Basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma of the skin: analysis of the Singapore Cancer Registry data 1968-97. Br J Dermatol. 148:1161-1166. [Crossref]

6. Amaro-Ortiz A, Yan B, D'Orazio JA (2014) Ultraviolet ra-diation, aging and the skin: prevention of damage by topical cAMP manipulation. Molecules. 19:6202-6219. [Crossref]

7. Amblard P, Leccia MT (1992) [Skin diseases with photo-sensitivity]. Rev Prat. 42:1365-1368. [Crossref]

8. Zuba EB, Koronowska S, Osmola-Mańkowska A, Jenero-wicz D (2016) Drug-induced Photosensitivity. Acta Der-matovenerol Croat. 24:55-64. [Crossref]

9. WebMD. Sun Poisoning. [Crossref]

10. Guerra KC, Crane JS. Skin Cancer Prevention. 2019 Jan 19. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): Stat-Pearls Publishing. [Crossref]

11. Guerra KC, Crane JS. Sunburn. [Updated 2018 Nov 23]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): Stat-Pearls Publishing; 2019. [Crossref]

12. McStay CM. What is the pathophysiology of sunburn?

Medscape, Nov 08, 2018. [Crossref]

13. Chapter 14 Diseases of the skin. In: Rick D. Kellerman, David Rakel. Conn's Current Therapy 2019, published by Elsevier Health Sciences, 2018 ISBN0323596509, 9780323596503, Page 1031. [Crossref]

14. Azevedo M, Bandeira L, Luza C, Lemos A, Bandeira F (2018) Vitamin D Deficiency, Skin Phototype, Sun Index, and Metabolic Risk Among Patients with High Rates of Sun Exposure Living in the Tropics. J Clin Aesthet Der-matol. 11:15-18. [Crossref]

15. Driscoll MS, Wagner RF Jr (2000) Clinical management of the acute sunburn reaction. Cutis. 66:53-58. [Cross-ref]

16. Faurschou A, Wulf HC (2008) Topical corticosteroids in the treatment of acute sunburn: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Arch Dermatol. 144:620-624. [Cross-ref]

17. Feily A, Namazi MR (2009) Aloe vera in dermatology: a brief review. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 144:85-91. [Crossref]

18. Puvabanditsin P, Vongtongsri R (2005) Efficacy of aloe vera cream in prevention and treatment of sunburn and suntan. J Med Assoc Thai. 88:173-176. [Crossref]

19. Tadicherla S, Berman B (2006) Percutaneous dermal drug delivery for local pain control. Ther Clin Risk Man-ag. 2:99-113. [Crossref]

20. Moore DE (2002) Drug-induced cutaneous photosensi-tivity: incidence, mechanism, prevention and manage-ment. Drug Saf. 25:345-372. [Crossref]

21. Drucker AM, Rosen CF (2011) Drug-induced photo-sensitivity: culprit drugs, management and prevention. Drug Saf. 34:821-837. [Crossref]

22. Harth Y, Rapoport M (1996) Photosensitivity associated with antipsychotics, antidepressants and anxiolytics. Drug Saf. 14:252-259. [Crossref]

23. Pile HD, Nicolas D. Isotretinoin. [Updated 2019 Feb 21]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): Stat-Pearls Publishing; 2019. [Crossref]

24. Hodgkiss-Harlow CJ, Eichenfield LF, Dohil MA (2011) Effective monitoring of isotretinoin safety in a pediat-ric dermatology population: a novel "patient symptom survey" approach. J Am Acad Dermatol. 65:517-524. [Crossref]

25. Das LM, Binko AM, Traylor ZP, Peng H, Lu KQ (2019) Vi-tamin D improves sunburns by increasing autophagy in M2 macrophages. Autophagy. 15:813-826. [Crossref]

26. Scott JF, Das LM, Ahsanuddin S, Qiu Y, Binko AM, et al. (2017) Oral Vitamin D Rapidly Attenuates Inflammation from Sunburn: An Interventional Study. J Invest Derma-tol. 137:2078-2086. [Crossref]

27. Golmohammadzadeh S, Imani F, Hosseinzadeh H, Jaafari MR (2011) Preparation, characterization and evaluation of sun protective and moisturizing effects of nanolipo-




• of 25 •

https://www.upmcmyhealthmatters.com/sunburn-vs-sun-poisoning/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25207380

https://www.medicinenet.com/sunburn_and_sun_poisoning/index.htm





https://www.webmd.com/skin-problems-and-treatments/sun-poisoning#1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519527/


https://www.medscape.com/answers/773203-93762/what-is-the-pathophysiology-of-sunburn

https://www.eu.elsevierhealth.com/conns-current-therapy-2019-9780323596480.html
















somes containing safranal. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 14:521-533. [Crossref]

28. Opene C, Chren MM, Linos E (2017) Types of Shade Vary in Protection Just Like Sunscreens. JAMA Dermatol. 153:1070-1071. [Crossref]

29. Wolf R, Matz H, Orion E, Lipozencić J (2003) Sunscreens--the ultimate cosmetic. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 11:158-162. [Crossref]

30. Latha MS, Martis J, Shobha V, Sham Shinde R, Bangera S, et al. (2013) Sunscreening agents: a review. J Clin Aes-thet Dermatol. 6:16-26. [Crossref]

31. Rego D, Fernandes L, Nascimento T, Grenha A (2010) Evaluation of a sunscreen during a typical beach period. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2:47-50. [Crossref]

32. Schalka S, Steiner D, Ravelli FN, Steiner T, Terena AC, et al. (2014) Brazilian consensus on photoprotection. An Bras Dermatol. 89:1-74. [Crossref]

33. Web WHO. Ultraviolet radiation (UV). [Crossref]

34. Volkovova K, Bilanicova D, Bartonova A, Letašiová S, Dusinska M (2012) Associations between environmen-tal factors and incidence of cutaneous melanoma. Re-view. Environ Health. 11:12. [Crossref]

35. Engelsen O (2010) The relationship between ultravio-let radiation exposure and vitamin D status. Nutrients. 2:482-495. [Crossref]

36. Diffey BL (2002) Human exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation. J Cosmet Dermatol. 1:124-130. [Crossref]

37. Ruszkiewicz JA, Pinkas A, Ferrer B, Peres TV, Tsatsakis A, et al. (2017) Neurotoxic effect of active ingredients in sunscreen products, a contemporary review. Toxicol Rep. 4:245-259. [Crossref]

38. Kannan S, Lim HW (2014) Photoprotection and vitamin D: a review. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 30:137-145. [Crossref]

39. Pandika M (2018) Looking to Nature for New Sun-screens. ACS Cent Sci. 4:788-790. [Crossref]

40. Gabros S, Zito PM. Sunscreens And Photoprotection. [Updated 2019 Jan 13]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Trea-sure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019. [Crossref]

41. FDA aims to strengthen sunscreen rules. Medical Press (Health), February 21, 2019. [Crossref]

42. Maddipatla M. U.S. FDA proposes new regulations for over-the-counter sunscreens. Reuters, February 22, 2019. [Crossref]

43. Ripamonti E, Allifranchini E, Todeschi S, Bocchietto E (2018) Endocrine Disruption by Mixtures in Topical Consumer Products. Cosmetics. 5:61. [Crossref]

44. Sunscreen: How to Help Protect Your Skin from the Sun. Web US FDA, February 21, 2019. [Crossref]

45. Only TWO of the 16 ingredients in sunscreen are defi-nitely safe, FDA declares: Two other chemicals will be

banned as the agency demands more research on the other 12. [Crossref]

46. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Pub-Chem Database. 4-Aminobenzoic acid, CID=978. [Cross-ref]

47. Kullavanijaya P, Lim HW (2005) Photoprotection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 52:937-958. [Crossref]

48. Tahiliani S, Shirolikar M (2018) Viva voce on sunscreens. Indian J Drugs Dermatol. 4:92-96. [Crossref]

49. Govindu PCV, Hosamani B, Moi S, Venkatachalam D, Asha S, et al. (2019) Glutathione as a photo-stabilizer of avobenzone: an evaluation under glass-filtered sun-light using UV-spectroscopy. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 18:198-207. [Crossref]

50. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Pub-Chem Database. Avobenzone, CID=51040. [Crossref]

51. Raffa RB, Pergolizzi JV Jr, Taylor R Jr, Kitzen JM, NEMA Research Group (2019) Sunscreen bans: Coral reefs and skin cancer. J Clin Pharm Ther. 44:134-139. [Crossref]

52. Aparici-Espert I, Miranda MA, Lhiaubet-Vallet V (2018) Sunscreen-Based Photocages for Topical Drugs: A Pho-tophysical and Photochemical Study of A Diclofenac-Avobenzone Dyad. Molecules. 23:673. [Crossref]

53. Yang C, Lim W, Bazer FW, Song G (2018) Avobenzone suppresses proliferative activity of human trophoblast cells and induces apoptosis mediated by mitochondrial disruption. Reprod Toxicol. 81:50-57. [Crossref]

54. Uco DP, Leite-Silva VR, Silva HDT, Duque MD, Grice J, et al. (2018) UVA and UVB formulation phototoxicity in a three-dimensional human skin model: Photodegrada-tion effect. Toxicol In Vitro. 53:37-44. [Crossref]

55. Monteiro MS, Ozzetti RA, Vergnanini AL, de Brito-Giti-rana L, Volpato NM, et al. (2012) Evaluation of octyl p-methoxycinnamate included in liposomes and cy-clodextrins in anti-solar preparations: preparations, characterizations and in vitro penetration studies. Int J Nanomedicine. 7:3045-3058. [Crossref]

56. Lin YC, Lin CF, Alalaiwe A, Wang PW, Fang YP, et al. (2018) UV filter entrapment in mesoporous silica hydrogel for skin protection against UVA with minimization of per-cutaneous absorption. Eur J Pharm Sci. 122:185-194. [Crossref]

57. De Coster S, van Larebeke N (2012) Endocrine-disrupt-ing chemicals: associated disorders and mechanisms of action. J Environ Public Health. 2012:713696. [Crossref]

58. Nash JF, Tanner PR. Chapter 9. Sunscreens. In: Zoe Di-ana Draelos, Lauren A. Thaman. Cosmetic Formulation of Skin Care Products Cosmetic Science and Technology, published by Taylor & Francis, 2005 ISBN 0849339685, 9780849339684, Page 139. [Crossref]

59. Chapter 4. Sun Sense, Page 132, Avobenzone Under Fire. In: Paula Begoun. The Complete Beauty Bible: The Ulti-mate Guide to Smart Beauty, published by Rodale, 2004




• of 25 •

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3586861/






https://www.who.int/uv/uv_and_health/en/








https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2019-02-21/fda-aims-to-strengthen-sunscreen-rules

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-fda-sunscreen/u-s-fda-proposes-new-regulations-for-over-the-counter-sunscreens-idUSKCN1QA2RI

https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9284/5/4/61

https://www.fda.gov/drugs/understanding-over-counter-medicines/sunscreen-how-help-protect-your-skin-sun

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-6731267/U-S-FDA-proposes-new-regulations-counter-sunscreens.html

https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/978



http://www.ijdd.in/article.asp?issn=2455-3972;year=2018;volume=4;issue=2;spage=92;epage=96;aulast=Tahiliani

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30421772/


https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jcpt.12778







ISBN1579549993, 9781579549992. [Crossref]

60. Ainbinder D, Touitou E. Chapter 44. Skin Photodamage Prevention: State-of-the-art and new prospects. In: Mi-randa A. Farage, Kenneth W. Miller, Howard I. Maibach. Textbook of Aging Skin, published by Springer Sci-ence & Business Media, 2009 ISBN 3 5 4 0 8 9 6 5 5 4 , 9783540896555, Page 436. [Crossref]

61. Gunia-Krzyżak A, Słoczyńska K, Popiół J, Koczurkiewicz P, Marona H, et al. (2018) Cinnamic acid derivatives in cosmetics: current use and future prospects. Int J Cos-met Sci. 40:356-366. [Crossref]

62. Rai R, Shanmuga SC, Srinivas C (2012) Update on pho-toprotection. Indian J Dermatol. 57:335-342. [Crossref]

63. Rao GS, Tokuda H, Ichiishi E, Takasaki M, Iida A, et al. (2013) Oral chemoprevention of skin cancer in mice by benzophenone sunscreens dioxybenzone and octaben-zone in drinking water. Anticancer Res. 33:2535-2540. [Crossref]

64. Heo S, Hwang HS, Jeong Y, Na K (2018) Skin protec-tion efficacy from UV irradiation and skin penetration property of polysaccharide-benzophenone conjugates as a sunscreen agent. Carbohydr Polym. 195:534-541. [Crossref]

65. Sherwood VF, Kennedy S, Zhang H, Purser GH, Sheaff RJ (2012) Altered UV absorbance and cytotoxicity of chlo-rinated sunscreen agents. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 31:273-279. [Crossref]

66. Butler TC (1948) Bromal Hydrate And Chloral Hydrate: A Pharmacological Contrast And Its Chemical Basis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 94:401-411. [Crossref]

67. Fediuk DJ. Pharmacokinetic and Toxicological Charac-terization of Repellent DEET and Sunscreen Oxyben-zone. [Crossref]

68. Seto Y, Ohtake H, Kato M, Onoue S (2015) Phototoxic Risk Assessments on Benzophenone Derivatives: Photo-biochemical Assessments and Dermal Cassette-Dosing Pharmacokinetic Study. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 354:195-202. [Crossref]

69. Ngan V. Allergy to benzophenone. Web DermNet NZ, 2012. [Crossref]

70. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Pub-Chem Database. Homosalate, CID=8362. [Crossref]

71. Kim TH, Shin BS, Kim KB, Shin SW, Seok SH, et al. (2014) Percutaneous absorption, disposition, and exposure as-sessment of homosalate, a UV filtering agent, in rats. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 77:202-213. [Crossref]

72. Kullavanijaya P, Lim HW (2005) Photoprotection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 52:937-958. [Crossref]

73. Erol M, Çok I, Bostan Gayret Ö, Günes P, Yigit Ö, et al. (2017) Evaluation of the endocrine-disrupting effects of homosalate (HMS) and 2-ethylhexyl 4-dimethylami-nobenzoate (OD-PABA) in rat pups during the prena-tal, lactation, and early postnatal periods. Toxicol Ind

Health. 33:775-791. [Crossref]

74. Wang J, Pan L, Wu S, Lu L, Xu Y, et al. (2016) Recent Ad-vances on Endocrine Disrupting Effects of UV Filters. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 13:782. [Crossref]

75. Homosalate. [Crossref]

76. Rodrigues NDN, Cole-Filipiak NC, Blodgett KN, Abeyse-kera C, Zwier TS, et al. (2018) Wavepacket insights into the photoprotection mechanism of the UV filter methyl anthranilate. Nat Commun. 9:5188. [Crossref]

77. Dale Wilson B, Moon S, Armstrong F (2012) Compre-hensive review of ultraviolet radiation and the current status on sunscreens. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 5:18-23. [Crossref]

78. Sivamani RK, Crane LA, Dellavalle RP (2009) The ben-efits and risks of ultraviolet tanning and its alterna-tives: the role of prudent sun exposure. Dermatol Clin. 27:149-154. [Crossref]

79. Pinto I, Bogi A, Picciolo F, Stacchini N, Buonocore G, et al. (2015) Blue Light and Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure from Infant Phototherapy Equipment. J Occup Environ Hyg. 12:603-610. [Crossref]

80. de Groot T, Chowdhary A, Meis JF, Voss A (2019) Killing of Candida auris by UV-C: Importance of exposure time and distance. Mycoses. 62:408-412. [Crossref]

81. Dai T, Kharkwal GB, Zhao J, St Denis TG, Wu Q, et al. (2011) Ultraviolet-C light for treatment of Candida al-bicans burn infection in mice. Photochem Photobiol. 87:342-349. [Crossref]

82. Nussbaumer B, Kaminski-Hartenthaler A, Forneris CA, Morgan LC, Sonis JH, et al. (2015) Light therapy for pre-venting seasonal affective disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 11:011269. [Crossref]

83. Lam RW, Levitt AJ, Levitan RD, Michalak EE, Cheung AH, et al. (2016) Efficacy of Bright Light Treatment, Fluox-etine, and the Combination in Patients With Nonseason-al Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 73:56-63. [Crossref]

84. Guy GP Jr, Thomas CC, Thompson T, Watson M, Massetti GM, et al. (2015) Vital signs: melanoma incidence and mortality trends and projections - United States, 1982-2030. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 64:591-596. [Crossref]

85. Sample A, He YY (2018) Mechanisms and prevention of UV-induced melanoma. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 34:13-24. [Crossref]

86. Mackiewicz-Wysocka M, Bowszyc-Dmochowska M, Strzelecka-Węklar D, Dańczak-Pazdrowska A, Adamski Z (2013) Basal cell carcinoma - diagnosis. Contemp On-col (Pozn). 17:337-342. [Crossref]

87. Sunscreen Options. In: Stephen E. Wolverton. Com-prehensive Dermatologic Drug Therapy, Edition 2, published by Elsevier Health Sciences, 2007 ISBN 1437720706, 9781437720709. [Crossref]




• of 25 •







https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/bitstream/handle/1993/8112/fediuk_daryl.pdf?sequence=1

http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/354/2/195/tab-article-info

https://www.dermnetnz.org/topics/allergy-to-benzophenone/






http://www.safecosmetics.org/get-the-facts/chemicals-of-concern/homosalate/

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-07681-1




https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/myc.12903







88. Chapter 9. Photoallergens. In: James G Marks Jr, Bryan E Anderson, Vincent A DeLeo. Contact & Occupational Dermatology, published by JP Medical Ltd, 2016ISBN 9351529363, 9789351529361. [Crossref]

89. Moyal D, Chardon A, Kollias N (2000) UVA protection efficacy of sunscreens can be determined by the per-sistent pigment darkening (PPD) method. (Part 2). Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 16:250-255. [Crossref]

90. Wang SQ, Xu H, Stanfield JW, Osterwalder U, Herzog B (2017) Comparison of ultraviolet A light protection standards in the United States and European Union through in vitro measurements of commercially avail-able sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 77:42-47. [Cross-ref]

91. Schalka S, Naranjo Ravelli F, Perim N, Vasconcelos R (2017) Chemical and Physical Sunscreens. Daily Rou-tine in Cosmetic Dermatology. 1:113-121. [Crossref]

92. Jallad KN (2017) Chemical characterization of sun-screens composition and its related potential adverse health effects. J Cosmet Dermatol. 16:353-357. [Cross-ref]

93. Protecting Your Skin. Chemical vs Physical (Mineral) Sunscreens: Pros and Cons. Blog Dr. Desjarlais, June 2, 2016. [Crossref]

94. Moloney FJ, Collins S, Murphy GM (2002) Sunscreens: safety, efficacy and appropriate use. Am J Clin Dermatol. 3:185-191. [Crossref]

95. Shetty PK, Venuvanka V, Jagani HV, Chethan GH, Li-gade VS, et al. (2015) Development and evaluation of sunscreen creams containing morin-encapsulated nanoparticles for enhanced UV radiation protection and antioxidant activity. Int J Nanomedicine. 10:6477-6491. [Crossref]

96. Kumar R, Deep G, Agarwal R (2015) An Overview of Ul-traviolet B Radiation-Induced Skin Cancer Chemopre-vention by Silibinin. Curr Pharmacol Rep. 1:206-215. [Crossref]

97. Levy SB. Chapter 29. UV Filters. In: André O. Barel, Marc Paye, Howard I. Maibach. Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology, published by CRC Press, 2009 ISBN 1420069683, 9781420069686. [Crossref]

98. Avenel-Audran M, Dutartre H, Goossens A, Jeanmougin M, Comte C, et al. (2010) Octocrylene, an emerging pho-toallergen. Arch Dermatol. 146:753-757. [Crossref]

99. de Groot AC, Roberts DW (2014) Contact and photocon-tact allergy to octocrylene: a review. Contact Dermatitis. 70:193-204. [Crossref]

100. Berkman MS, Yazan Y (2012) Solid lipid nanoparti-cles: a possible vehicle for zinc oxide and octocrylene. Pharmazie. 67:202-208. [Crossref]

101. Karlsson I, Vanden Broecke K, Mårtensson J, Goossens A, Börje A (2011) Clinical and experimental studies of

octocrylene's allergenic potency. Contact Dermatitis. 64:343-352. [Crossref]

102. Briasco B, Capra P, Mannucci B, Perugini P (2017) Sta-bility Study of Sunscreens with Free and Encapsulated UV Filters Contained in Plastic Packaging. Pharmaceu-tics. 9:19. [Crossref]

103. Manová E, von Goetz N, Hungerbühler K (2014) Ultra-violet filter contact and photocontact allergy: consum-er exposure and risk assessment for octocrylene from personal care products and sunscreens. Br J Dermatol. 171:1368-1374. [Crossref]

104. Blüthgen N, Meili N, Chew G, Odermatt A, Fent K (2014) Accumulation and effects of the UV-filter octocrylene in adult and embryonic zebrafish (Danio rerio). Sci Total Environ. 476-477:207-217. [Crossref]

105. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Pub-Chem Database. Octinoxate, CID=5355130.) [Crossref]

106. Lim HW, Thomas L, Rigel DS. Chapter 6. Photoprotec-tion. In: Darrell S. Rigel, Robert A. Weiss, Henry W. Lim, Jeffrey S. Dover. Photoaging Basic and Clinical Derma-tology, published by CRC Press, 2004 ISBN0824752090, 9780824752095. [Crossref]

107. Molecule of the Week Archive. In a few years, coral in Hawaiian waters will no longer have to put up with us. What molecules are we? Web ACS, July 16, 2018. [Cross-ref]

108. Siller A, Blaszak SC, Lazar M, Olasz Harken E (2018) Update About the Effects of the Sunscreen Ingredients Oxybenzone and Octinoxate on Humans and the Envi-ronment. Plast Surg Nurs. 38:158-161. [Crossref]

109. Raffa RB, Pergolizzi JV Jr, Taylor R Jr, Kitzen JM; NEMA Research Group. (2019) Sunscreen bans: Coral reefs and skin cancer. J Clin Pharm Ther. 44:134-139. [Cross-ref]

110. Cinoxate Market is Likely to Witness huge Growth - Major Key Players are Parchem(US), Carbosynth Limited(UK), Synchem UG & Co. KG(DE). Market Re-search Gazette, April 17, 2019. [Crossref]

111. Schneider SL, Lim HW (2018) A review of inorganic UV filters zinc oxide and titanium dioxide. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. [Crossref]

112. Axelstad M, Boberg J, Hougaard KS, Christiansen S, Jacobsen PR, et al. (2011) Effects of pre- and postna-tal exposure to the UV-filter octyl methoxycinnamate (OMC) on the reproductive, auditory and neurological development of rat offspring. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 250:278-290. [Crossref]

113. Darbre PD (2006) Environmental oestrogens, cosmet-ics and breast cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 20:121-143. [Crossref]

114. Wang Y, Marling SJ, Plum LA, DeLuca HF (2017) Salate derivatives found in sunscreens block experimental au-toimmune encephalomyelitis in mice. Proc Natl Acad




• of 25 •

https://www.amazon.com/Contact-Occupational-Dermatology-James-Marks/dp/9351529363




https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-3-319-12589-3_7

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jocd.12282

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jocd.12282

https://www.drdesjarlais.com/protecting-your-skin/chemical-vs-physical-mineral-sunscreens-pros-and-cons/




https://www.amazon.com.br/Handbook-Cosmetic-Science-Technology-Andr%C3%A9/dp/1420069683












https://amarketresearchgazette.com/cinoxate-market/




Sci U S A. 114:8528-8531. [Crossref]

115. Varinia Michalun, Joseph C. DiNardo. Skin Care and Cosmetic Ingredients Dictionary, published by Cengage Learning, 2014 ISBN 1305178211, 9781305178212. [Crossref]

116. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Pub-Chem Database. Oxybenzone, CID=4632. [Crossref]

117. DiNardo JC, Downs CA (2018) Dermatological and envi-ronmental toxicological impact of the sunscreen ingre-dient oxybenzone/benzophenone-3. J Cosmet Derma-tol. 17:15-19. [Crossref]

118. Sung CR, Kim KB, Lee JY, Lee BM, Kwack SJ (2019) Risk Assessment of Ethylhexyl Dimethyl PABA in Cosmetics. Toxicol Res. 35:131-136. [Crossref]

119. Zoe Diana Draelos. Procedures in Cosmetic Dermatol-ogy Edition 2, published by Elsevier Health Sciences, 2008 ISBN 1437720943, 9781437720945. [Crossref]

120. Bastien N, Millau JF, Rouabhia M, Davies RJ, Drouin R (2010) The sunscreen agent 2-phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid photosensitizes the formation of oxi-dized guanines in cellulo after UV-A or UV-B exposure. J Invest Dermatol. 130:2463-2471. [Crossref]

121. Inbaraj JJ, Bilski P, Chignell CF (2002) Photophysical and photochemical studies of 2-phenylbenzimidazole and UVB sunscreen 2-phenylbenzimidazole-5-sulfonic acid. Photochem Photobiol. 75:107-116. [Crossref]

122. Rai R, Shanmuga SC, Srinivas C (2012) Update on pho-toprotection. Indian J Dermatol. 57:335-342. [Crossref]

123. Darrell S. Rigel, Robert Friedman, June K. Robinson, Merrick I. Ross, Clay J Cockerell, Henry Lim, Eggert Stockfleth, John M Kirkwood. Cancer of the Skin E-Book: Expert Consult Edition 2, published by Elsevier Health Sciences, 2011ISBN 1437736149, 9781437736144. [Crossref]

124. Approved Drug Products and Legal Requirements Vol-ume 3 of USP DI: V. 3 of USP, United States Pharma-copeial Convention, Inc, published by Thomson Mi-cromedex, 2006 ISBN1563635763, 9781563635762. [Crossref]

125. USP DI: Approved Drug Products and Legal Require-ment USP DI VOL 3, published by Thomson/MICRO-MEDEX, 2005, ISBN156363516X, 9781563635168. [Crossref]

126. Lin EW, Boehnke N, Maynard HD (2014) Protein-poly-mer conjugation via ligand affinity and photoactivation of glutathione S-transferase. Bioconjug Chem. 25:1902-1909. [Crossref]

127. Hermanson GT (2013) Chapter 18 - PEGylation and Synthetic Polymer Modification. In: Greg Hermanson. Bioconjugate Techniques (Third edition). 2013:787-838. [Crossref]

128. US FDA Database. CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. [Crossref]

129. Nicholas J. Lowe. Sunscreens: Development: Evalua-tion, and Regulatory Aspects: Second Edition, Cosmetic science and technology series, published by CRC Press, 1996 ISBN 0824793064, 9780824793067. [Crossref]

130. Kaur A, Thatai P, Sapra B (2014) Need of UV protection and evaluation of efficacy of sunscreens. J Cosmet Sci. 65:315-345. [Crossref]

131. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Pub-Chem Database. Trolamine salicylate, CID=25213. [Crossref]

132. Trolamine salicylate. [Crossref]

133. Smijs TG, Pavel S (2011) Titanium dioxide and zinc ox-ide nanoparticles in sunscreens: focus on their safety and effectiveness. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 4:95-112. [Crossref]

134. Trivedi M, Murase J. Chapter 4. Titanium Dioxide in Sunscreen. In: Magdalena Janus. Application of Tita-nium Dioxide, published by Intech Open, 2017 ISBN 9535134299, 9789535134299. [Crossref]

135. Mohammed YH, Holmes A, Haridass IN, Sanchez WY, Studier H, et al. (2019) Support for the Safe Use of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle Sunscreens: Lack of Skin Penetra-tion or Cellular Toxicity after Repeated Application in Volunteers. J Invest Dermatol. 139:308-315. [Crossref]

136. Wright PFA (2019) Realistic Exposure Study Assists Risk Assessments of ZnO Nanoparticle Sunscreens and Allays Safety Concerns. J Invest Dermatol. 139:277-278. [Crossref]

137. Jiang J, Pi J, Cai J (2018) The Advancing of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications. Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2018:1062562. [Crossref]

138. Tian L, Lin B, Wu L, Li K, Liu H, et al. (2015) Neurotoxic-ity induced by zinc oxide nanoparticles: age-related dif-ferences and interaction. Sci Rep. 5:16117. [Crossref]

139. Schwarz T (2005) Mechanisms of UV-induced immuno-suppression. Keio J Med. 54:165-171. [Crossref]

140. Ullrich SE. (2005) Mechanisms underlying UV-induced immune suppression. Mutat Res. 571:185-205. [Cross-ref]

141. Katiyar SK (2007) UV-induced immune suppression and photocarcinogenesis: chemoprevention by dietary botanical agents. Cancer Lett. 255:1-11. [Crossref]

142. Cho BA, Yoo SK, Seo JS (2018) Signatures of photo-aging and intrinsic aging in skin were revealed by transcrip-tome network analysis. Aging (Albany NY). 10:1609-1626. [Crossref]

143. Bosch R, Philips N, Suárez-Pérez JA, Juarranz A, Devmu-rari A, et al. (2015) Mechanisms of Photoaging and Cutaneous Photocarcinogenesis, and Photoprotective Strategies with Phytochemicals. Antioxidants (Basel). 4:248-268. [Crossref]

144. Kang S, Fisher GJ, Voorhees JJ (2001) Photoaging: pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment. Clin Geriatr




• of 25 •


https://www.amazon.com/Skin-Care-Cosmetic-Ingredients-Dictionary/dp/1285060792


https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jocd.12449


https://www.elsevier.com/books/procedures-in-cosmetic-dermatology-series-cosmeceuticals-with-dvd/dover/978-1-4160-5553-2




https://www.elsevier.com/books/cancer-of-the-skin/rigel/978-1-4377-1788-4

https://www.worldcat.org/title/usp-di/oclc/217277016

https://www.bookdepository.com/USP-DI-3-Approved-Drug-Products-Legal-Requirements-Thomson-PDR/9781563635168

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/bc500380r

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123822390000182?via%3Dihub

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm

https://www.abebooks.com/9780824793067/Sunscreens-Development-Evaluation-Regulatory-Aspects-0824793064/plp



http://dermapproved.com/active-ingredients/trolamine-salicylate


https://www.intechopen.com/books/application-of-titanium-dioxide



https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bca/2018/1062562/

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep16117






https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/4/2/248

Med. 17:643-659. [Crossref]

145. Han A, Chien AL, Kang S (2014) Photoaging. Dermatol Clin. 32:291-299. [Crossref]

146. Sjerobabski Masnec I, Poduje S (2008) Photoaging. Coll Antropol. 32:177-180. [Crossref]

147. Fisher GJ, Kang S, Varani J (2002) Mechanisms of Pho-toaging and Chronological Skin Aging. Arch Dermatol. 138:1462-1470. [Crossref]

148. Rabe JH, Mamelak AJ, McElgunn PJ, Morison WL, Sauder DN. (2006) Photoaging: mechanisms and repair. J Am Acad Dermatol. 55:1-19. [Crossref]

149. Rittié L, Fisher GJ (2015) Natural and sun-induced ag-ing of human skin. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 5:015370. [Crossref]

150. Amano S (2016) Characterization and mechanisms of photoageing-related changes in skin. Damages of base-ment membrane and dermal structures. Exp Dermatol. 25:14-19. [Crossref]

151. Pamela RD (2018) Topical Growth Factors for the Treatment of Facial Photoaging: A Clinical Experi-ence of Eight Cases. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 11:28-29. [Crossref]

152. Dhaliwal S, Rybak I, Ellis SR, Notay M, Trivedi M, et al. (2019) Prospective, randomized, double-blind assess-ment of topical bakuchiol and retinol for facial photo-ageing. Br J Dermatol. 180:289-296. [Crossref]

153. Mukherjee S, Date A, Patravale V, Korting HC, Roeder A, et al. Retinoids in the treatment of skin aging: an over-view of clinical efficacy and safety. Clin Interv Aging. 1:327-348. [Crossref]

154. Pandel R, Poljšak B, Godic A, Dahmane R (2013) Skin photoaging and the role of antioxidants in its preven-tion. ISRN Dermatol. 2013:930164. [Crossref]

155. Sivamani RK, Crane LA, Dellavalle RP (2009) The ben-efits and risks of ultraviolet tanning and its alterna-tives: the role of prudent sun exposure. Dermatol Clin. 27:149-154. [Crossref]

156. Juzeniene A, Moan J (2012) Beneficial effects of UV ra-diation other than via vitamin D production. Dermato-endocrinol. 4:109-117. [Crossref]

157. Choi W, Miyamura Y, Wolber R, Smuda C, Reinhold W, et al. (2010) Regulation of human skin pigmentation in situ by repetitive UV exposure: molecular characteriza-tion of responses to UVA and/or UVB. J Invest Dermatol. 130:1685-1696. [Crossref]

158. Brenner M, Hearing VJ (2008) The protective role of melanin against UV damage in human skin. Photochem Photobiol. 84:539-549. [Crossref]

159. Hwang YJ, Park HJ, Hahn HJ, Kim JY, Ko JH, et al. (2011) Immediate pigment darkening and persistent pigment darkening as means of measuring the ultraviolet A pro-tection factor in vivo: a comparative study. Br J Derma-

tol. 164:1356-1361. [Crossref]

160. Del Bino S, Duval C, Bernerd F (2018) Clinical and Bio-logical Characterization of Skin Pigmentation Diver-sity and Its Consequences on UV Impact. Int J Mol Sci. 19:2668. [Crossref]

161. Rattanachaikunsopon P, Phumkhachorn P (2007) Bac-teriostatic effect of flavonoids isolated from leaves of Psidium guajava on fish pathogens. Fitoterapia. 78:434-436. [Crossref]

162. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Pub-Chem Database. Morin, CID=5281670. [Crossref]

163. Beasley DG, Meyer TA (2010) Characterization of the UVA protection provided by avobenzone, zinc oxide, and titanium dioxide in broad-spectrum sunscreen products. Am J Clin Dermatol. 11:413-421. [Crossref]

164. Tanner PR (2006) Sunscreen product formulation. Der-matol Clin. 24:53-62. [Crossref]

165. Weber C, Podda M, Rallis M, Thiele JJ, Traber MG, et al. (1997) Efficacy of topically applied tocopherols and tocotrienols in protection of murine skin from oxida-tive damage induced by UV-irradiation. Free Radic Biol Med. 22:761-769. [Crossref]

166. Chapter 2. Raw materials of cosmetics. In: Hiroshi Iwata, Kunio Shimada. Formulas, Ingredients and Production of Cosmetics: Technology of Skin- and Hair-Care Prod-ucts in Japan, published by Springer Science & Busi-ness Media, 2012ISBN 4431540601, 9784431540601. [Crossref]

167. Alcohol (Page 17). In: Raymond C. Rowe, Paul J. Shes-key, Marian E. Quinn. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Ex-cipients, edition 6, published by Pharmaceutical Press, 2009ISBN 1582121354, 9781582121352. [Crossref]

168. Lachenmeier DW (2008) Safety evaluation of topical applications of ethanol on the skin and inside the oral cavity. J Occup Med Toxicol. 3:26. [Crossref]

169. SD Alcohol 40. [Crossref]

170. Romanowski P. Cosmetic formulation basics - Sun-screens. [Crossref]

171. Habbema L, Halk AB, Neumann M, Bergman W (2017) Risks of unregulated use of alpha-melanocyte-stim-ulating hormone analogues: a review. Int J Dermatol. 56:975-980. [Crossref]

172. Garone M, Howard J, Fabrikant J (2015) A review of common tanning methods. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 8:43-47. [Crossref]

173. Ciriminna R, Fidalgo A, Ilharco LM, Pagliaro M (2018) Dihydroxyacetone: An Updated Insight into an Impor-tant Bioproduct. ChemistryOpen. 7:233-236. [Crossref]

174. Martini MC (2017) [Self-tanning and sunless tan-ning products]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 144:638-644. [Crossref]

175. Holman DM, Fox KA, Glenn JD, Guy GP Jr, Watson M, et




• of 25 •




https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/article-abstract/479061



https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/exd.13085


https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bjd.16918














https://www.abebooks.com/9784431540601/Formulas-Ingredients-Production-Cosmetics-Technology-4431540601/plp

https://www.abebooks.com/9781582121352/Handbook-Pharmaceutical-Excipients-1582121354/plp


https://thedermreview.com/sd-alcohol-40/

https://chemistscorner.com/cosmetic-formulation-basics-sunscreens/

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijd.13585




al. (2013) Strategies to reduce indoor tanning: current research gaps and future opportunities for prevention. Am J Prev Med. 44:672-681. [Crossref]

176. Give me a tan! - Megan Fox. News24.com Archives, 2008-11-07. [Crossref]

177. March B. 10 celebs who look better tan-free. COSMO-POLITAN, July 14, 2014. [Crossref]

178. Haggan M. Warning on incorrect sunscreen use. Austra-lian Journal of Pharmacy, 16/01/2018. [Crossref]

179. Grand View Research. U.S. Sun Care Market Size, Share, Industry Trends Report, 2018-2025. [Crossref]

180. Sunscreen Manufacturing Industry in the US. IBIS-World, September, 2018. [Crossref]

181. Zirwas MJ, Andrasik W (2018) Can Sunscreens Harm Coral Reefs? Addressing Environmental Concerns and Offering Practical Recommendations. Skinmed. 16:223-229. [Crossref]

182. Belluz J. Hawaii is banning sunscreens that kill coral reefs. Vox, July 2, 2018. [Crossref]

183. Reef-safe Sunscreen: What You Need To Know. Blog CHASING CORAL. [Crossref]

184. Danovaro R, Bongiorni L, Corinaldesi C, Giovannelli D, Damiani E, et al. (2008) Sunscreens cause coral bleach-ing by promoting viral infections. Environ Health Per-spect. 116:441-447. [Crossref]

185. Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation. Replenishing Coral Reefs in the Pacific Ocean. [Crossref]




• of 25 •


https://www.news24.com/Entertainment/CelebNews/Give-me-a-tan-Megan-Fox-20081107

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/beauty-hair/celebrity-hair-makeup/g3550/celebrities-with-tans-better-pale/

https://ajp.com.au/news/warning-incorrect-sunscreen-use/

https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/us-sun-care-market

https://www.ibisworld.com/industry-trends/specialized-market-research-reports/consumer-goods-services/cosmetics-personal-care-manufacturing/sunscreen-manufacturing.html


https://www.vox.com/2018/7/2/17525496/hawaii-banning-sunscreen

https://www.chasingcoral.com/2018/05/23/reef-safe-sunscreen-need-know/


https://www.leonardodicaprio.org/replenishing-coral-reefs-in-the-pacific-ocean/




• of 25 •

an extensive review on sunscreen and suntan preparationsbackground ra (re) was the primary name of...

Documents