An economic case for non-drug methods of treating disease

Vitamin B-17 therapy

The removal of Vitamin-B17 (Laetrile) from the shelves in the USA is, we feel, the ultimate scandal by the Health Industry. Instead of attributing the death of a child on anti-cyanide drugs -after she had eaten lots of sour apricots -the Health Industry blamed it on Vitamin-B17. A directive was consequently issued, leading to the authorities removing all Vitamin-B17 from health food shops. From an Alternative and Complimentary health point of view, it is understood that cyanide taken in colloidal form does not

harm the body. The body knows how to deal with this safely and excrete it from the body without ill-effect. (In fact, there is a case where someone wanted to prove this point and took high doses of cyanide in colloidal form with no ill-effect. If, however, he had taken the same quantity in normal toxic form, he would have been dead within a few minutes.) The authorities have bought down the laetrile site so here is the book http://www.realityzone.com/lch.html

“I am a brain cancer survivor and I did it with B17 and metabolic therapy. I am living proof this therapy works. At 41, I was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer and was told that I would die, so I have personally fought this battle; and although there is nothing easy about it, it is a war which can be won.” www.czlonkamediagroup.com

The benefits of Vitamin B-17 therapy have been well known for years but it’s something that the medical profession will not look into and those who have tried to make it popular have ended up behind bars.

“My introduction to apricot kernels was through a friend who lives in New South Wales. She visited my house in September of 2000 and was very sad as she had been diagnosed with metasised bone cancer and had spots on her rib, spine and hip. She previously had had breast cancer some six years before this diagnosis. I know she thought her life expectancy was doomed and I felt quite shattered as I also had breast cancer 18 months before this and had used my friend as a benchmark of how I was going to progress.”

”When speaking to her some months later to check on her health, she informed me she was eating apricot kernels, and in huge quantities each day. I believe it was around 30. This intrigued me as I had no idea there was any value in the kernel of this fruit but decided to start searching the internet for information and this is when I started to come across Phillip Day and other sites which endorsed this cancer strategy.”

“My friend is now cancer free according to her professor/specialist and a hair test, she has a lavender farm which she works from the bush to the end product and also has alpachas...hard work......what an inspiration she is.

My cancer was bad, aggressive, two tumours in the left breast and 14 of 17 lymph nodes cancerous. I had a macestomy of the left breast, undertook 4 intense doses of chemo and 6 standard doses, spaced 3 weeks apart. I also had 6 weeks of radiation therapy. I knew I had a fight on my hands as the specialist was very clear to explain that their belief was the cancer would be elsewhere.”

“I made a decision to take other vitamin supplements, including selenium at the very beginning of my diagnosis and then when I heard about apricot kernels, I thought maintenance and prevention was my next option. With experimentation I had the kernels daily but found I had reflux so interpreted that my body was telling me I did not need to have these those frequequently and have now taken them twice weekly...the equivalent of a flat teaspoon of crushed kernels each time. My five year extensive check up happened in March of this year and all my tests are great. I am very well, feel terrific and know I have lots of energy to enjoy a wonderful life with my precious family and friends. My health is my wealth and the help and joy I give to others, who are embarking on a journey with cancer, is a wonderful reward for being a survivor.” Judy Martin from South Australia

"My name is Donald Factor. I was living in London in November of 1986 when I was diagnosed with carcinoma of the lung that had spread to my liver. Basically the doctors in England didn't hold a lot of hope for me. They were very apologetic and offered a treatment which they thought might extend my life for a little while, but not for very long. I didn't feel like accepting that prognosis and decided to go and see Dr. Contreras.”

”This all happened in 1986 so it will be 16 years this November. After the initial treatment and about a year of home therapy, I was totally clear of any sign of cancer. I went back regularly for check-ups and after about three years of being in remission, the doctors said I was cured. I said, 'I thought in the cancer business you were never cured.' And they said, 'Well it is silly to keep writing down remission year after year. We'll see you whenever you want to come back,' and that was it. I already had a lot of ideas about the orthodoxy, I suppose I'd call it, of modern science. I was never happy with it. I had known people with HIV and Aids and I was always rather disturbed at the way that disease was treated and how in those days it seemed that anyone who was diagnosed with HIV was dead within a couple of years. It didn't seem right to me, it seemed to me that there was something else and I knew a bit about alternatives and complimentary medicine.” Donald Factor is the son of Max Factor; the legendary make-up artist.

G. Edward Griffin - A World Without Cancer - The Story Of Vitamin B17: http://youtu.be/QeYMduufa-E

Bicarbonate cancer therapy

Bicarbonate cancer therapy is another incredibly cheap intervention for cancer. Dr Tullio had done an enormous amount of work in this area but again the orthodox medical profession turn their backs on his ideas’ – what you don’t understand – ignore.

Dr. Tullio Simoncini Sodium Bicarbonate cancer therapy

Dr Simoncini discovered and incredibly simple ‘cancer cure’ for both hard and soft cancers costing pennies, yet this incredible breakthrough has been ignored by the health industry. Did you know that the AVERAGE orthodox cancer treatment costs £150,000?? The average alternative cancer treatment costs about £750 or less, and is 33 times more effective than any orthodox treatment. So why do insurance companies gladly pay for orthodox cancer treatments and refuse to pay for alternative cancer treatments? The same rule applies to depression. Guess who is in bed with whom? There is a lot of financial incest between the ownership and leadership of large insurance companies and the medical

cartel. People desperately need alternative cancer treatments that are virtually free. The use of Bicarbonate of Soda as a cancer treatment agent is a list of alternative cancer treatments which are among the least expensive on earth. Actually, many of them are free. One costs about £1.00.

Simoncini Cancer Therapy -My First Cured Patient

One of the first patients I treated was an 11-year-old child (picture for illustration only), a case which immediately gave me the indication that I was following the right path. The child arrived in coma at the pediatric hematology ward around 11:30 in the morning with a clinical history of leukemia. Because of the disease the child had been transferred from a small town in Sicily to Rome, going through the universities of Palermo and Naples, where he underwent several chemotherapy sessions. The desperate mother told me that she had been unable to speak with the child for the past 15 days, that is, since the

child had departed on his journey through the hospitals. She said she would have given the world to hear her son’s voice once again before he died. As I was of the opinion that the child was comatose both because of the brain invasion by the fungin colonies and because of the toxicity of the therapies that had been performed, I concluded that if I could destroy the colonies with sodium bicarbonate salts and at the same time nourish and detoxify the brain with glucose phleboclysis, I could hope for a regression of the symptomatology. And so it was. After a continuous infusion with phleboclysis of bicarbonate and glucose solutions, I found the child speaking with his mother, who was crying, at around 19.00 hours when I came back to the university. http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/

Part 1-3 of Dr Simonici Lectures http://youtu.be/00tE6U22sEw

http://youtu.be/hne9Ihox0dE

http://youtu.be/jBq4kJ75rHs

Cancer - The Forbidden Cures– full documentary http://youtu.be/gWLrfNJICeM

Let’s rubbish vitamins once again

It never ceases to amaze me how the medical profession is hell bent on rubbishing vitamins and minerals. Maybe Dr Wallach was right to publish the article ‘Dead Doctor’s don’t lie’.

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ)'s Fictitious "Case Against Vitamins" by Jean Carper. Vitamin opponents' efforts to steer you away from supplements have taken a frightening new direction. Attacks on vitamins are escalating from allegations of merely "useless" to "extremely dangerous." This alarming message is central to "The Case Against Vitamins," in the Wall Street Journal, March 20, 2006. The subhead sets the tone: "Recent studies show that many vitamins not only don't help. They may actually cause harm." http://www.jeancarper.com/

There was one such study to test if St. John’s wart was effective for depression together with two pharmaceutical drugs. This was followed by big headlines in newspapers ‘Study found St. John’s wart is ineffective against depression’. They totally left out the fact that the two pharmaceutical drugs that were tested alongside this herb were an abysmal failure as well.

Now the morons in the EEC are trying to ban the use of vitamins and minerals – big brother having gone totally senile. Yet every new study has ignored the lessons learnt from some of the most amazing studies ever undertaken on the effects of nutrition on our health. Why do you think they keep pressing the message -eat 5-portions of fruit and vegetables per day?

A lifelong research study by Dr Dennis Burkett found that almost all cases of natural death in our modern world were due to nutritional deficiency. He was later knighted for his contribution to the advancement of science.

An independent study by the controversial Dr Joel Wallach, ND and expert in major and trace minerals and known as the mineral doctor. Dr Wallach has been nominated for a Nobel Prize in medicine. A Grant from the National Institute of Health allowed him to perform autopsies on all of the animals that died of natural causes in many American zoos. Over a period of some 12 years he undertook 17,500 autopsies on over 454 species of animals and 3,000 humans who lived in close proximity to the zoos. He found that every animal and every human who died of natural causes died of nutritional deficiency! A five year research project by the National Cancer Institute and the university of Harvard Medical School involving 29,000 people in China concluded; three nutraceuticals taken together at double the Recommended Daily Allowance can reduce all deaths by 9%, all cancers by 13% and all stomach/oesophagus cancers in particular by a staggering 21%.

The cost of prevention is about 50-100 pence per day. Now, no matter how you look at it, that is a pretty good deal to increase your longevity and quality of life. Why spend millions of pounds on treating severe medical problems when you only need to spend pennies to prevent them. Also regular intravenous doses of Vitamin-C can reverse almost all cancers without surgery, chemotherapy or radiation. This not only costs pennies but you don’t have to mutilate people or end up addressing the damage with expensive drugs like Herceptin. By the way, regular infusions of ascorbic acid can completely remove the need for this extremely expensive drug with dubious health properties. Ascorbic acid and hydrogen peroxide given intravenously has other health benefits other then to kill cancer cells – it can also destroy the underlying viruses helping people recover completely from things like hepatitis.

Intravenous Vitamin C for Cancer Cure on CBC News: http://youtu.be/ycT6mI3SAi4

Intravenous Vitamin-C Cancer Therapy

Linus Pauling (pictured left on the USA stamp) was right all along – Vitamin-C is toxic to cancer cells after all. There are lots of stories where people who were given only months to live, living 10+ years with regular infusion of Vitamin-C; their cancer having disappeared completely without dangerous surgery, chemotherapy and radiation.

The problem with surgery is that it causes ‘metastasis’ which is another name for the spread of cancer in the body. Chemotherapy and radiation will kill some of the cancer cells but millions of more resilient cells still lurk around in the body causing the cancer to spread within years to other parts of the body.

And the problem with chemotherapy is that it is toxic to both normal and cancer cells. However, because cancer cells grow at a very fast rate it kills more cancer cells then normal cells. So it becomes a race of what kills you faster – the cancer or the effects of chemotherapy. During the second world war when they were ‘gassing’ lots of people to death they noticed that the effect of the mustard gas was to reduce the number of white blood corpuscles so they thought we wonder if we can find a use for this and chemotherapy was born. According to a lot of people such as Dr Hamer this is a cruel and totally unnecessarily procedure. “Perhaps you know someone who has cancer. Perhaps, heaven forbid, you yourself have this most dreaded of diseases. For you, I have an extraordinary story, and one that gives genuine hope to everyone. It concerns my mother, Edith, who was diagnosed with end-stage breast cancer. Our family doctor gave her just three months to live, and told the family that we should say our good-byes.”

“We’ll never know why Edith had nursed the cancer for several years without telling a soul. Perhaps she hoped that it might just go away, or perhaps it was an exercise in magical thinking that something we don’t define doesn’t really exist. Whatever the reason, it turned out to be the best thing she could have done, even though the doctor said that her breast was by that stage the most awful thing he had seen in his years of practice.”

“Of course, as editors of What Doctors Don’t Tell You, and knowing what we know, we couldn’t accept the death sentence. We asked the doctor if we could take charge of her care. As he had nothing to offer – she was too late for chemotherapy or radiotherapy – he was happy to do so. We immediately contacted one of our editorial panel, an eminent doctor who looks beyond the mainstream for effective treatments. He was confident he could reverse the cancer, even at that late stage, and when we met him with Edith, he explained what he would do.” “Central to the treatment was vitamin C therapy, given intravenously. This was to be combined with intravenous hydrogen peroxide, and a radical change to Edith’s diet. It was a bold approach, because study after study had disproved the theory, first mooted by Linus Pauling, that high doses of vitamin C could kill cancer cells. Pauling had gone to his grave, certain that the theory was right, and yet never having the recognition from his peers. Within six months of treatment, Edith’s breast had completely healed. Within a year all signs of cancer had gone. The family doctor saw her in the street a year on from his gloomy prognosis, and he was convinced he had seen a ghost. He asked her to have a scan, which revealed no trace of cancer whatsoever.” “So why am I telling you this story? This week a news headline caught my eye. Researchers have finally confirmed that Pauling was right all along. When they gave three terminal cancer treatments high-dose vitamin C, their tumours shrunk. As they reported in the latest issue of the Canadian Association’s Medical Journal, vitamin C is toxic to cancer cells.” So why has it taken so long, 30 years in fact, to prove Pauling’s theory? Because every study used vitamin C tablets, but it’s only effective when given intravenously. To me, this is a scandal. Too many people have died from cancer when we had the means at our disposal to have saved the lives of many, many cancer victims. It just required someone to have been open-minded enough to test properly. It just required someone to think beyond toxic pharmaceuticals.” WDDTU -E-news broadcast. 242 -23 March 2006 Intravenous Vitamin C for Cancer Cure on ABC News: http://youtu.be/MCBRMFBVzi0

Hulda Clarke Cancer Therapy

The World Health Organisation states that one of the biggest threats to global health is parasitic invasion of our bodies. The toxins in our food, environment and our teeth just encourage this infestation. Dr Hulda Regehr Clark, Ph.D states 'new research findings show there is a single cause for all cancers'. Her work is based entirely on elimination of Toxins and Parasites in our bodies for remarkable success. Dr Clark, the author of the book ‘Cure for all Cancers’ and the book ‘Cure for all Disease’ finally had to flee from the institutionalised tyranny in the USA (she was about to be prosecuted for practicing medicine without a licence – oh I see only the doctors have the right to save lives?) and set-up[ camp in Mexico. Yet there are millions of followers of Dr Clark who are saving countless lives around the world without drugs. Even the Pope’s own physician was so impressed that he is using Dr Clark’s techniques in his own practice.

“My brother and myself have both been diagnosed with PROSTATE CANCER. At the time I found out 2 years ago, I didn’t know about Alternative treatments so I just went along with my Doctor and had the operation to remove my Prostate. Since then I have read books and followed up with your Parasitic program.

My brother on the other hand, decided to try alternative methods after I told him about your book and other ways of treating Cancer without his prostate being removed. He started the parasite program plus he went to a clinic in R. Nevada.

Dr. B. that works with improving the immune system. (Dr B supports your methods.) His PSA was over 6 with a positive biopsy of cancer, but it is now below 1.”

“Now his regular doctor is all upset because he didn’t follow his advice to remove the Prostate even though the PSA is back to Normal. In fact he had an appointment yesterday with his doctor and this doctor actually told him that he would be dead within 3 years and said that all these alternative methods he has tried is all a bunch of quackery and these doctors are taking him for a sucker. What is going on in this country?

The regular doctors are out to stop anyone that does not do it their way. I believe in these alternative methods because I saw what the conventional medicine did to my father-in-law who died from lung cancer.”

http://www.drclark.net/ “My husband was given 3 months to live two years ago due to prostrate cancer. By reading your newsletter and the information you provide, I contacted the right people, and he started the Hulda Clark cancer therapy ... though sheer grit and determination he succeeded with the therapy and was later told that he was clear of cancer. Thank you for being you ... please renew my subscription.” Mrs, Dyfed. What Doctors Don't Tell You, UK.

Dr Clark states that parasites can complete the cycle that normally needed an external host (animal) as our bodies have become more and more polluted with toxic waste from our unhealthy lifestyle. Toxins in our food, water, air, cosmetics, toiletries, junk-food and bad dental hygiene (gingivitis, root-fillings, amalgam-fillings & tooth implants) can become so overpowering that the parasites overwhelm our bodies. If they end up in the liver then our immune system is compromised and we end up with cancer, or if they accumulate in the hyperthermus then we end up with aids. She goes on to say that just 3-herbs in nature, taken together, can eradicate over a hundred parasites from our bodies (far more effective then any drugs). The cost of this treatment is about £50-£100.

If is very difficult for many people to understand any other way except for the ones they feel comfortable with. My own kids will not read or review this book. That think dad has gone completely mad for the last seven years with his quest to save the world. Yet my son is doing his PhD at Oxford on Biochemistry for treating cancer by orthodox means but will not consider alternative methods. Sometime people will fight to prove they are right, unfortunately some people will die to prove they were right. I have seen it far too often that people will ignore information that could save their lives – they look at you in total disbelief as if you are from another planet -only months down the line they die from the toxic effects of chemotherapy and radiation. Here are a few examples:

The mothers of my friend Linda in Wales become very ill with stomach cancer. The doctors wanted to put her on chemotherapy straight away. I persuaded my friend to get her mother on Dr Clarke’s protocol, which she did, and within weeks her mother’s condition had improved considerably. However, the medical profession put a lot of pressure on her mother who finally caved-in and agreed to go along with chemotherapy. Within weeks her condition worsened and she died within months of her treatment. On her death bed this is what she had to say: “I wish I had listened to you Linda and instead of listening to the doctors.”

In July 2007 the mother-in-law of one of our clients came to us for help when she was diagnosed with lung cancer. As her son-in-law is a medical doctor it was easy to get her started on intravenous Vitamin-C therapy tighter with Dr Clark and Dr Hamer therapy. However, a week later she opted out of the programme because her son had put a lot of pressure on her to go along with chemotherapy. His argument was that the alternative methods were not tried and tested so why not go along with what her doctor was advising her to do. Six weeks after the commencement of her treatment she became very ill and died in November 2007. Here is the full playlist of Dr Hulda Clark’s videos http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL95AE2F342BE7112D

In 2005 when I went to Wales for an interview on starting my diploma in clinical hypnotherapy I picked up a book in the book-shop called ‘The cure for all cancers’ by Dr Clarke. At about the same time my beloved niece developed lung cancer. She was offered chemotherapy which accelerated her demise. I advised her to look into alternative methods but she refused – in fact as I found later on that she actually took offence to my suggestions. Anyway, she went to Pakistan and within weeks she became very ill. I put together an electronic circuit published on the internet by Dr Bob Beck (based on Dr Steven Kali’s invention) and give it to her sister to take to her in Pakistan so she could eradicate the underlying pathogens that were the cause of the problem. Before she got on the plane she heard the bad news -her sister got very ill and died. The stranglehold that the medial profession has on us is unbelievable, especially when we are very vulnerable.

My last story concerns a relative of mine in Stoke who was diagnosed with breast cancer. She decided not to go along with her advisors who were all for vasectomy followed by chemotherapy. She elected to go to Pakistan and be treated by a well know Muslim Hakim. It’s been four years now and all traces of cancer have been eradicated from her body. There are loads of cases like this where people have gone into spontaneous remission using alternative methods of dealing with the problem.

You can see lots of testaments for every disease under the sun at the Dr Clarke resource centre: http://www.drclark.net/en/testimonials/index.php

Micro-current Cancer Therapy

Dr Steven Kaali at the Einstein College of Medicine in 1990 discovered that the HIV virus could be immobilised by passing a small electric current through the blood leaving the normal cells unaffected. All bacteria, virus and fungus were also rendered ineffective in infecting normally healthy cells by this method. Dr Bob Beck pioneered a method of utilising this technology in a non-invasive method which opened up the way for everyone and not just the elite few to make use of this technology.

In effect Dr Kaali had accidentally stumbled upon the cure to all disease including cancers, aids etc. It has already been established that most cancers are due to pathogens.

We already know that prostrate, cervical and breast cancer are due to viruses. New vaccines are now being developed for all of these conditions; this is also true for other things like aids.

Dr Hulda Clarke has already established that cancers are caused by parasites – she cured 100 people before she wrote her book ‘The cure to all cancers’.

Dr. Tullio Simoncini has established that cancers are caused by fungus and he has saved countless lives by eradicating fungus by the use of bicarbonate of Soda. I would not be surprised if it turns out that all cancers are caused by various pathogens in ten years time from now. So, doesn’t it make sense to eradicate all of these pathogens using safe non-invasive methods like these?

Normally, patents take years to be granted by Dr Kaali was granted a patent in just 6-months. This shows that the patent office received some fairly conclusive evidence of the effectiveness of this treatment. This treatment costs about £100-£200.

Later on Dr Bob Beck took up where Dr Kaali had left off and come up with an invention which he then published on the internet making it available to all of us. Bob beck died in 2007 having made a real contribution to humanity.

You can Bob Beck’s seminars on YouTube: http://youtu.be/xMlXd9hLpcY

Dr Hamer Cancer Therapy

Dr Rake Hamer developed a system for dealing with cancer by removing trauma from the mind. The medical authorities in Austria had to concede that after 4 to 5 years 6,000 out of 6,500 patients with mostly advanced cancer were still alive because of his work. That is over 90%, almost a reversal of the results to be expected after conventional treatment of advanced conditions.

While this trial was taking place the BMA was printing scathing attacks on Dr Hamer’s character. In fact there were two trials taking place at the same time.

The doctor who finally had Dr Hamer committed to the ‘loony bin’ for two years (totally ignoring the fact that he had saved 6,000 people from terminal cancer) did not even bother to interview him – he was satisfied that a medical doctor who has publicly gone against the use of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation must have gone barking mad. Dr Hamer ended up behind bars for two years. Yet Dr Hamer had developed an avid following, just like Dr Clarke all over the world. The cost of this treatment is around £300-600. All of this information and more can be seen at these websites: http://germanic-new-medicine.com/index.php

http://www.newmedicine.ca/

Videos

GERMAN NEW MEDICINE TVE 1994 * English subtitles* Part 1 and 2 http://youtu.be/OD4UGcNB5Ww

http://youtu.be/kFAXf2wIvWE

Dichloroacetate (DCA) cancer therapy

DCA is an odourless, colourless, inexpensive, relatively non-toxic, small molecule. And researchers at the University of Alberta believe it may soon be used as an effective treatment for many forms of cancer. Dr. Evangelos Michelakis, a professor at the U of A Department of Medicine, has shown that dichloroacetate (DCA) causes regression in several cancers, including lung, breast, and brain tumors.

Until recently, researchers believed that cancer-affected mitochondria are permanently damaged and that this damage is the result, not the cause, of the cancer. But Michelakis, a cardiologist, questioned this belief and began testing DCA, which activates a critical mitochondrial enzyme, as a way to "revive" cancer-affected mitochondria. The results astounded him.

Dr. Michelakis and his colleagues, including post-doctoral fellow Dr. Sebastien Bonnet, have published the results of their research in the journal Cancer Cell.

"I think DCA can be selective for cancer because it attacks a fundamental process in cancer development that is unique to cancer cells," Michelakis said. "One of the really exciting things about this compound is that it might be able to treat many different forms of cancer”.

Another encouraging thing about DCA is that, being so small, it is easily absorbed in the body, and, after oral intake, it can reach areas in the body that other drugs cannot, making it possible to treat brain cancers, for example. Dr Evangelos (pictured left) shown on live on American TV.

Also, because DCA has been used in both healthy people and sick patients with mitochondrial diseases, researchers already know that it is a relatively non-toxic molecule that can be immediately tested patients with cancer.

Cost of treatment, at the most £100 - £200. You can read up on this remarkable discovery that has been aired on American TV as a marvel cure that no one will fund, or look into, because there is no money in it for the drug companies.

http://youtu.be/DotT8L2ILFI http://youtu.be/tkDIPbAU_nk http://www.cancermonthly.com/iNP/view.asp?ID=220 http://www.thedcasite.com/

Dr Holt Radio-Wave Cancer

Over a period of 30 years, highly qualified Perth-based surgeon Dr John Holt has had some startling successes with a radio-wave therapy treatment for cancer patients. However, this radical treatment has polarised the medical community in Australia. His supporters say he's been vilified, while his detractors point out there is no scientific basis for his claims.

Elvina Johnson had a lot of living to do when she was told she had an aggressive form of bone cancer. At 18, doctors discovered she had a "galaxy of tumours". She lost her leg and underwent intensive chemo treatment to try and stop it spreading. Her cancer was so severe that she relapsed soon after. "It was through both of my lungs and by that stage it was pretty terminal," she told Ray Martin. Elvina was desperate. Quite by chance she heard about a cancer specialist with a highly controversial procedure. "By taking the chance and finding this man, I am here six years later and probably feeling better than ever, so I have had a rebirth," she said.

Dr Holt's controversial treatment works, in layperson's terms, by giving the patient an injection of a glucose-blocking agent. He then shines "radio waves" into the body at a specific frequency. Dr Holt doesn't guarantee it will cure every cancer, but it's not expensive and there's no quackery about it.

Born in Bristol 80 years ago and a member of the Royal Colleges, Dr Holt has 26 medical letters after his name. For more than a decade he was in charge of Western Australia's main cancer institute, until the late '70s, when he was blacklisted by his medical colleagues and politicians.

"The doctors took up such an action initially, they said the treatment was fake and useless," said former WA Premier John Tonkin. But Tonkin added, "There is no doubt whatsoever in my mind that this is the most advanced form of cancer treatment in the world today." The polarisation of the medical and scientific community in Perth over Dr Holt's treatment has been evident since the mid-'70s. "It is an unproven form of cancer treatment and it's not part of the armoury of orthodox ways of treating cancer in Australia," said Clive Deverill, the former boss of WA's Cancer Council. "Equally, there are legions of patients who have been down that track who can't say anything about their position because they're dead." While the medical community continues to argue the merits of Dr Holt's unorthodox measures, the families of his successes feel they owe everything to this gentle man. After two brain tumours and a tumour on her spine, Sophia Rosa was sent by pre-eminent brain surgeon Dr Charlie Teo for the radical treatment. Two years later, the only sign Sophia had cancer are the side-effects from the massive doses of chemotherapy given in Sydney. "Sometimes I think maybe Sophia's reason for getting sick was so people would know about Doctor Holt,” said Louise Raso, Sophia’s mum. http://www.cam.net.uk/home/aaa315/healing/john-holt-cancer-treatment.htm

Dr Holt retired from practicing medicine and treating people with his unique cancer therapies, in 2004. However, the legacies he leaves the community are significant. Dr Holt is a very modest cancer treatment innovator. He spent his life saving peoples lives and his inquisitive and inventive mind led him on a journey into very forward thinking theories about causes of cancer and ways to treat it.

Dr Holt treated thousands of persons with Radiowave Therapy, and when he retired at 80 years of age, he passed his treatment methods, systems and processes to the Radiowave Therapy Clinic and to the Radiowave Therapy Research Institute.

You can read all about this treatment and also look at the Australian TV coverage of Dr Holt’s methods on the official website below. The second URL is where you can read up on the testimonials of several people who have benefited from Dr Holt’s treatment. The cost of the treatment about £1,000 to £2,000. Compare this to one chemotherapy course which costs about £15,000 for one course of treatment and has a pathetic 2% success rate in the UK and 3% in the USA – and they call this science (sounds more like utter bullshit to me).

Very few people go into remission after chemo but suddenly and dramatically develop secondary complications or leukemia within five years. People treated with Dr Holt therapy are still alive and well after 30 years. Did you know that over 80% of oncologists will not take chemotherapy themselves?

The www.Healthwyze.org do a beautiful job of showing what modern cancer cure are all about – don’t be too shocked with the truth. The full cancer report: http://youtu.be/Kz-_FvX7inQ Dealing with doctors: http://youtu.be/Ff_RaLh2OdA

Exercise Cancer Therapy

Don’t you wish your doctor would give you this kind of information free of charge instead of putting you onto nasty drugs?

More and more research is showing that cancer patients who exercise have a significantly better rate of survival. Here are some of the recent studies we found:

A study of almost 3000 women with stage 1-3 breast cancer showed that women who exercised for an equivalent of four to five 30-minute sessions of brisk walking each week improved their survival rate and overall mortality from other causes by 50-60%. Interestingly, these benefits were independent of the subjects’ pre-diagnosis activity levels.

Holmes MD, Chen WY,Feskanich D, et al: “Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis”. JAMA 293:2479-2486, 2005

Another two studies had guidelines closely parallel to the Holmes study but were done on colorectal cancer patients. These studies showed a similar association between physical activity and post-diagnosis mortality. However, for the colorectal cancer subjects, the level of activity required to reduce mortality was about double that for the women in the breast cancer study.

Meyerhardt JA, Giovannucci EL,Holmes MD, et al. "Physical activity and survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis." J.Clin.Oncol 24:3527-3534, 2006

Meyerhardt JA, Heseltine D, Niedzwiecki D, et al: "The impact of physical activity on cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: Findings from CALGB 89803." J Clin Oncol 24:3535-3541, 2006

The cost to stay cancer-fee -absolutely nothing. So put your exercise shoes on and start walking one hour a day. Just one hour of walking all you need to reclaim up to ten years of your life.

Ayurvedic cancer therapy

Dr Chopra in his book ‘Quantum Healing’ talks about spontaneous healing in his patents that just cannot be explained by the orthodox medical model. People who were given months to live were still alive years later. Dr Chopra goes on to explain this phenomenon with ayurvedic principles of healing. This is worth of reading if you want to know more the mind-body principle of healing. Deepak Chopra in his book Quantum Healing introduces the holistic view of mind and body, that one is the other. Our bodies work perfectly and heal easily unless we interfere with the balance of mind and body. Our

mind has a natural blueprint for perfect health. Illness is merely a symptom of dis-ease between mind and body. http://www.chopra.com/ According to Upanishads, "As is a man's will, so is his action; as is his action, so he becomes".

The cause and the cure of all disease are born with the body itself. Ayurveda focuses on finding and treating the root cause of the disease. Interestingly, there are some similarities between Ayurvedic principles and the latest findings on the growth of cancerous cells in the body. Each cancer is unique in the way it grows and develops, its chances of spreading, the way it affects one’s body and the symptoms one may experience. According to Sir Paul Nurse, who received the Noble Prize for medicine last year, cancer is caused when certain genes get damaged in the body, as a result, is unable to check a proliferation of its own cells. Why and how these genes become damaged is still a mystery for the Modern science.

This is just the tip of the iceberg, there are so many wonderful, inexpensive and safe treatments out there that do not require, mutilation with surgery, poisoning with chemotherapy or burning with radio therapy. Only corruption and greed stops you having access to any of them. As I have time I will add the other wonderful protocols. This link to a third party site – it’s as if I had written it myself – great minds think alike don’t you think? This is the stuff you should be taught at primary school so you can stay healthy without ending up at the mercy of a corrupt health care system that is only interested in making money out of your misery: What Would I Do If I had Cancer…Or Other Chronic Disease? http://www.health-recovery-info.com/2012/06/what-would-i-do-if-i-had-cancer-or-other-chronic-disease/

The Cholesterol Myth

We, at ‘Life Principles’, get numerous letters of support from people from all around the world telling us that the free information we have provided on various health topics has improved their lives. This also applies to our fellow colleagues who provide alternative-remedy information. Yet, we feel that our treatment by certain individuals from the mainstream medical profession is unfortunate.

Those accessing our website (www.lifeprinciples.com) will see that our website is like an 'open book'. It is both informative and honest, hosting information on a variety of ailments and their respective cures. Information about particular medications are also included, i.e. both their

benefits and non-benefits, respectively, alongside information about certain ailments.

A case in point is the use of statins. Statins are prescribed to reduce the levels of cholesterol within an individual. However, ‘Life Principles’ believes that statins are unlawfully killing millions of people around the world every year. Many people are having their hearts or kidneys destroyed by this product. In the USA, there is a safeguard in place by the FDA -that chemists are not allowed to keep 40mg of this product, thus allowing both the physician and the patient time to opt for alternate remedies.

Cholesterol pill warning: Scientists raise fears of cancer link to statin used by thousands A drug used to treat high cholesterol could cause cancer, doctors warned last night. Results from a controversial study published yesterday in the New England Journal of Medicine show a higher than expected number of cancer cases reported among patients taking Inegy. It showed a total of 105 cancer cases among Inegy patients compared with 70 taking a placebo. That was an increase on the preliminary rates of 93 and 65 respectively reported in July. The trial found no benefit of the drug in reducing aortic disease in patients with a partially blocked heart valve, and little effect on cardiovascular events such as heart attacks. MailOnline; 03rd September 2008

Statins are prescribed to reduce the levels of cholesterol within an individual. However, ‘Life Principles’ believes that statins are unlawfully killing millions of people around the world every year. Many people are having their hearts or kidneys destroyed by this product. In the USA, there is a safeguard in place -by the FDA -that chemists are not allowed to keep 40mg of this product, thus allowing both the physician and the patient time to opt for alternate remedies.

There are thousands of horror stories on the use of stations on the internet. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZk4lEsU140&feature=share&list=PLdpWFdxaNWiT1viUeU3NrqolesD5Jt81P The rule of thumb is that if the trails are from the drug companies then drop them in the nearest gutter. If they have been independently verified then treat them with some respect. A major study by the BMJ has found that 90% of all pharmaceutical drugs don’t have any beneficial effect on people. In fact most drugs do more harm than good. The heath industry is based on a scam of epic proportions making massive amounts of money on useless and ineffective products.

Lower Cholesterol Can Kill You

In an open challenge to conventional medicine, Dr. Gottfried A. Lange, M.D. one of Europe's leading advocates for innovative and alternative approaches to treating heart disease worldwide debunks the five most common myths about the causes and treatment of heart disease in his newest book; "How to Really Prevent and Cure Heart Disease." 2008, NewsBlaze, Daily News

Dr. Lange's shocking, sure to be controversial indictment of the medical profession and Pharmaceutical industry cites scientific study after study that note:

1. About $50 billion per year is paid to the pharmaceutical industry for drugs to lower cholesterol without any improvement in heart attack and stroke statistics;

2. Cholesterol does NOT cause heart attacks and strokes; 3. High cholesterol levels are actually associated with high life expectancy and low cancer rates; 4. All cholesterol-lowering drugs potentially cause cancer and the two most common of these drugs are highly carcinogenic; 5. Low cholesterol may contribute to declining sexual functions, Alzheimer’s disease, and behavioral violence.

Some statins can have serious side effects I have recently discovered. I had been taking them Simvastatin as prescribed. I then slowly but surely started to get muscle pains, cramps, headaches, lethargy, pins and needles numbness and loss of sensation in my legs and feet, rashes and itching. Tiredness and a general feeling of being unwell to the point that I was awake approx. 4 hours in 24 hours. Plus a lot of weight gain approx. 35 pounds!! I had been blaming the Bronchitis I had earlier this year for this. Having gone back to my doctor several times with these problems I finally suggested to him that I come off these tablets, as I have not had a heart attack or mild stroke and my cholesterol is fine. I stopped taking them on 30th July and slowly but surely these side effects are going away. I do think I will have to see a Neurologist to see if any permanent damage has been done! At the very least I feel like I am alive again now. M. Woods, Maidenhead. U.K., 03/9/2008 13:04 I wouldn't touch Statin drugs with a bargepole. I used to prescribe them, and suffered all the side effects. Now I just take a magnesium tablet, twice a day -cholesterol levels; normal! For blood pressure, a simple hawthorn berry capsule, again twice a day, and my BP is back to normal. Cheap and it works, on me, anyway! Before switching to the magnesium it would take a doctor, sister, nurse, up to half an hour to find a vein to take a blood sample, Now, my veins are back to normal -my GP doesn't understand it. I also take a CO Q10 capsule, again twice a day. Statin strips the heart of CO Q10, which weakens it -there's many other benefits from taking CO Q10, you can look them up via the internet. No side effects with any of the above treatments. Joe Anderson, Alexandria, Scotland, 03/9/2008 12:53 In the UK however, we see many people on 40 mg of statin, easily available from the chemist. Statins were also the subject of a press release -issued by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) -that high doses of this medication can reverse the ageing process of the arteries and veins. We feel that high doses of this medication not only causes fatigue, poor concentration and depression, but can destroy the delicate valves in your heart -leading to heart-valve replacement -alongside kidney damage -resulting in individuals undergoing kidney dialysis. The general view of the ailment itself (i.e. cholesterol) alongside the 'supposed' remedy should therefore be reviewed:

How can it be that medicine has been so badly misled for the past 40 years? American nutritionist Ancel Keys (pictured left) created the high-fat diet/CHD hypothesis in 1957 after he carried out an analysis of food and health in six countries. Those countries that had the highest fat consumption per capita also had the highest rates of heart disease, he found. Keys discovered only years later that his research was incomplete. Had he widened his research to include data from another 16 countries that he also had, the fat/CHD connection would have disappeared. On discovering this, Keys tried to retract his earlier conclusions, but by then, the vast medical and foods industries were in full swing, and a new myth had been created.

One study of elderly people reveals that those with low cholesterol levels were twice as likely to suffer a fatal heart attack as those with high cholesterol levels. And another eye-opening study tells us that more than 60 per cent of all heart attack victims have normal cholesterol levels. Fewer than 5 per cent of people with ‘dangerous’ high cholesterol levels ever have a heart attack.

World Congress of Cardiology, Barcelona (statins study); Annals of Internal Medicine, October 2, 2006, online version (low cholesterol levels study.) More information on how the drug companies skew statistics to gain approval. Winston Churchill once said, there are lies, and there are damn lies, and there are statistics. Here is a full playlist of videos on this important subject: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLunVQHwRn9fgGg5OJmelXPpFwVDTy2rUg

The Hypertension Myth

If you think the use of statins is daft then you should consider the use of antihypertensives. Antihypertensive are the second baggiest money spinner after statins. They work by removing the sodium from the body however they are not selective and also deplete potassium from the body as well. This can lead to mental lethargy leading to a poor diet which can cause the very thing it’s trying to prevent. There is no justification for putting anyone onto statins or antihypertensives.

Blood pressure levels are dropping without drugs

Hypertension (high blood pressure) drugs represent one of the most lucrative product sectors for the pharmaceuticals – and the fact that blood pressure levels are reducing in industrialized countries suggests they are effective.

But a new World Health Organization (WHO) study has discovered that blood pressure levels are declining among people who have never been prescribed a hypertensive – and were falling across populations before the drugs were being so readily prescribed. This suggests that the family of antihypertensives is taking credit for a phenomenon that is more down to lifestyle changes, such as quitting smoking, and eating a healthier diet.

The WHO study monitored blood pressure levels of around 23,000 people aged from 35 to 64 from 21 countries across four continents from 1985 to 1995. The average level dropped by 2.2 mm Hg in men and by 3.3. mm Hg in women over the 10 years. During the same period, antihypertensive prescriptions rose by 11 per cent among people with high blood pressure, and yet their blood pressure improved by the same amount as those who were not taking a drug. Researchers reckoned that blood pressure levels should have dropped by 19 mm Hg among those taking a drug if the medication was being effective. Doctors should be doing more to encourage people with high blood pressure to adopt healthier lifestyles – and this alone should be enough to improve the problem – without reaching for their prescription pads. Will the drug companies be prepared to stand back and watch 20 per cent of their revenues suddenly disappear? British Medical Journal, 2006; 332: 629-32 Dr Joel Wallach on High Blood Pressure http://youtu.be/9WZHjAR_hv4 Dr Joel Wallach – Dead Doctors Don’t lie http://youtu.be/I-nZ9vv1EyM “Pay it forward”

I saw a film about a little boy called “pay it forward” an idea of each one of us helping just three individuals without expecting anything in return then teaching them to do the same. Without knowing it, he had started a revolution. He himself thought he had failed then one last time he saw his friend being bullied and was no-longer willing to turn a blind-eye. He intervened in the fight and was fatally stabbed. Unknowingly he had rebuilt the lives of thousands of people from school children to prisoners. Helping someone without expecting anything in return is the most beautiful thing you can do for that individual.

A lot of these simple ideas for treating disease are too big to be brushed under the carpet just like all the other simple life saving ideas of the past. It's up to each and every one of us to decide if we are going to let an ignorant government or a medical system that has been hijacked by the drug barons dictate to us. Just tell three people about these amazing natural treatments and tell them to demand this inexpensive treatment on the NHS. Before we know it, we may have created a revolution that is unstoppable. At the end of the day it's our NHS and we should have a say in how it's run not the greedy drug barons. We should be putting people’s lives before corporate profits and shareholder dividends.

The advantage of such an approach is that other ideas worthy of consideration may also become accepted once we get them to buy into one simple idea first. If we succeed, we may be help to cut the NHS drug bill by half. Now, that's something to smile about -more jobs and beds in the NHS!

"Never believe that a few caring people can't change the world. For, indeed, they are the only ones who ever have." Margaret Mead

The Revolution Against Medical Tryanny with Dr. Joel Wallach http://youtu.be/0O9POr5jmRs This is an ongoing project … Shokat Ali 20-01-2013