an australian public works department -...
TRANSCRIPT
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
Open BIM?
Some Australian examples
An Australian Public Works Department Lead by a dynamic early BIM adopter
Corporatized arm of state government
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
Organisational Structure - Large range of scale and types of government buildings
- Projects up to about $50 mil done in-house
- Multi-disciplinary organization
- Range of projects with external consultants
Architecture
Building Surveying
Civil Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Environmental Engineering
Fire Services
Hydraulic Engineering
Landscape Architecture
Mechanical Engineering
Office Interiors
Project Management
Quantity Surveying
Specialist Engineering
Structural Engineering
Surveying
Town Planning
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
ArchiCAD about 40%
Revit Architecture about 60%
Revit Structure
Revit MEP
DDS Hydraulics
CadDuct
ArchiCAD - Interiors
ArchiCAD - Landscape
Solibri
Affinity
Codebook
CostX
Tekla
12D
IES
SketchUp
Navisworks
EDM Model Server
Plus others
Looking at:
Artra
Urban Circus
EcoDomus
dRofus
Ryhti
A large range of BIM Software used:
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
Reality:
- Almost every project is multi-platform
- Need for interoperability
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
Discipline Models
- Architecture
- Structural
- Mechanical
- Electrical
- Hydraulic
- Civil
- Landscape
- Interior Design
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
Models Supplied to Contractor
Architecture
Civil
Electrical
Hydraulic Structural
Mechanical
Landscape
Fitout
The Contractor could open individual files or combined models to view.
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
Software Viewers There were two viewers supplied to the contractor, DDS Viewer (bottom right) and
Tekla Viewer for structures (Top left).
With the DDS Viewer,
contractors were able to
slice the model up and
interrogate any area they
desired.
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
IFC Model
CNC Cutting Machines
Site Installation
Manufacturing Process
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
Why is this?
- Almost every project is multi-platform
- This leads to significant problems with digital
collaboration and project co-ordination
- Higher level use of models for analysis and simulation
becomes restricted
How to solve this?
Greater interoperability
How to achieve that?
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
What to address first? - Issues of quality of IFC export file from source software
Why?
- Poor or inconsistent modelling practice
- Custom object created for project to random standard
- Poor or inconsistent quality of Library Objects
- Incorrect IFC definitions of objects
- Incorrect mapping when exporting
Result: Staff reaction "IFC's don't work”
- So where are the problems?
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
A place to start:
The Revit to IFC process
- This greatest area for benefit as architecture,
structure and services done in Revit.
Quality control tools needed:
- Simple to use for modellers
- Quick results
- Useful for monitoring projects
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
Tools being looked at to assist in quality control:
- IFC File Analyzer
- IFC Object Counter
- Solibri Model Checker
- Navisworks
- DDS Viewer
- Solibri Model Viewer
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
Process 1. Export IFC file
2. Run through IFC File Analyzer
3. Identify 'BuildingElementProxy' objects
4. Upgrade Revit file with IFC Parameter Upgrade file
5. Create schedules in Revit for Multi Categories, and other
appropriate object types
6. Check results from schedules and IFC File Analyzer output
7. Add or alter IFC definitions
8. Check export mapping file, and alter to correct mappings
Repeat 1. Export again
Repeat 2. Run IFC File Analyzer again etc.
9. Check number of objects present in Revit and IFC files
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
Results: - This process helps modellers to understand the need to use
correct BIM tool, and correct associated IFC parameter, and
enables them to be main point of quality control.
- It is not particularly sophisticated but introduces a quality control
capability without staff learning new ‘challenging’ software.
- This is a narrow focus and easier for staff to comprehend
- Consistent higher quality models created for other purposes.
- More thorough and detailed analyses are done with Solibri Model
Checker and Navisworks for a range of purposes, ie. Clash
detection, code compliance.
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
Resultant requirements:
1. Staff training
- IFC understanding
- Revit export process
2. Need for Revit – IFC mappings to be documented
3. Better quality Object Library
- Correct IFC definitions
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
2. Need for Revit – IFC mappings to be
defined and documented
- Classification – need to settle on system for
Australia
- IFD / bsDD needed
- Revit Categories and sub Categories
assigned correct IFC definition
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
2. Need for Revit – IFC mappings to be
defined and documented
IFD / bsDD ?
Real world / Revit name mapping to IFC definition
IFC definition mapping to real world / Revit name
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
3. Better quality Object Library
- Correct IFC definitions
- Correct BIM tools used to construct objects
- Objects populated with useful and complete parameters
- And.......
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
3. National Objects Library project
- Research project of ‘Sustainable Built Environment national
research centre’ (SBEnrc)
- Queensland University of Technology (QUT) lead
by Robin Drogemuller
- Project Services main contributor
- NATSPEC contributor
- Quality objects with parameters to be useful over building life
cycle
Scott Beazley Australasian Chapter, Oslo March 2012
Open BIM ?
Still need to solve the:
- People issues
- Model quality issues
- Process issues