an advocacy program for women

Upload: nigbarrett

Post on 02-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    1/24

    Ame rican Journal of Com mu nity Psychology Vol. 20 No. 3 1992

    A n A d v o c a cy I n t e r v e n ti o n P r o g r a m f or W o m e n

    wi t h Abus i v e Pa rt ners In i ti a l E v a l ua t i o n I

    Cris M. Sullivan 2 Cheribeth Tan Joann a Basta

    Mau reen Rumptz and W illiam S. Davidson II

    Michigan Stale University

    Experimentally tested the hypotheses that (1) battered women are in need of

    nu m ero us co m m un ity resources up on exit fr om a domestic violence shelter,

    (2) wo rking with advocates increases w om en s effectiveness in obtaining neede d

    resources and social support, and (3) success in obtaining resources and social

    supp ort increases w om en s levels o f life satisfaction an d decreases their risk of

    fur the r abuse. The initial findin gs o f a short-term intervention proje ct designed

    to provide postshelter advocacy services to women with abusive partners are

    p r e s e n t ed . O n e - h u n d r e d f o r t y - o n e b a t te r e d w o m e n w e r e i n t er v i ew e d

    imm ediately up on their exit fr om a dom estic violence shelter as well as 10

    week s thereafter. H a lf the sam ple wa s ran dom ly assigned to receive the services

    of t rained advocates who ass is ted them in access ing needed communi ty

    resources. W om en wh o work ed with advocates reported b eing m ore effective

    in accessing resources and had higher levels of social support and overall

    quality o f life postintervention. Al tho ug h all w om en reported so m e decrease in

    postshelter abuse, there were no differences between those with and those

    without advocates, and abuse continued to be a problem for ma ny women.

    A rev iew o f the ex i s t ing l i t e r a tu re r eve a l s tha t the re a r e s t il l ma ny mo re

    q u e s t i o n s t h a n a n s w e r s i n t h e d o m e s t i c v i o l e n c e fi el d. T h e r e is n o o n e

    o v e r a l l t h e o r y w h i c h e x p l a i n s w h a t c a u s e s w o m a n b a t t e r i n g o r w h y i t i s s o

    1The authors would l ike to

    thank the

    edi tor and three anonymous rev iewers for the i r he lpfu l

    a nd

    constructive comments on early drafts of this

    art ic le . This work was supported by

    Nat iona l Ins t i tu te of Menta l Hea l th Grant 1R01 MH 48849.

    2All corre spon denc e should be sent to Cris Sullivan Psychology Dep artm ent Michigan State

    University Ea st Lansing Mic higan 48824-1117.

    3 9

    0091-0562/92/0600-0309506.50/0 1992 Plenum PublishingCorporation

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    2/24

    310 Sullivan Tan Basta Rumptz and avidson

    prevalent . There is , however , consensus among researchers on a number

    of dimensions: woman battering is prevalent, affecting approximately 1.6

    mill ion women each year (Straus & Gelles, 1986); violence in intimate

    relat ionships increases in sever ity and frequ ency over t ime (Hilber t &

    Hilbert , 1984; Hornung, McCullough, & Sugimoto, 1981; Okun, 1986;

    Ro bert s , 1984; Stacey & Shupe , 1983; W alker , 1985); and nu m er ou s

    barr iers exis t which l imit women's abi l i t ies to leave abusive par tners

    (Aguirre, 1985; Gond olf, 1988; Hilbert & Hilbert , 1984; Hofeller, 1982;

    Ho rton , Simonidis, & Simonidis, 1987 ; Sidel, 1986; Strube & Barb our,

    1983).

    arriers to Ending the Violence

    On e of the most f requent ly asked quest ions in the domest ic violence

    l i terature cont inues to be Why does she s tay? Some bel ieve that the nega-

    tive psychological effects of battering serve to keep women in dangerous

    relationships. Others point out, however, that numerous barriers exist to

    keep women trapped in violent homes, including the assailants ' threats to

    kil l the w om en an d their children should they try to escape (Browne, 1987;

    Greaves, Heapy & Wylie, 1988; Schutte, Malouff, & Doyle, 1988; Walker,

    1983).

    M an y res ear che rs (i.e., Aguirr e, 1985; Carlson, 1977; Gelles, 1979;

    Greaves, Heap y, & Wylie, 1988; Hofeller, 1982; Rounsaville, 1978; Roy,

    1977; Strube & Barbour, 1983) have found that lack of adequate resources

    i s a pr imary reason for remaining wi th or re turn ing to abus ive men.

    S p e c i f i c a l l y , m a n y b a t t e r e d w o m e n l a c k t h e e m p l o y m e n t , h o u s i n g ,

    education, f inances, legal assistance, and social support systems needed to

    enable them to l ive independently of their batterers.

    Lack of Community Resources Lack of employment and inadequate

    f inances are f requent ly ment ioned by women as reasons for remaining in

    abusive relationships. In her study of 50 battered women, Hofeller (1982)

    found that 58% of her sample s tayed because they fel t they could not sup-

    port themselves (and their children, wh ere applicable) on their own. Strube

    and Barbour (1983) also found that employment contributed heavily to the

    decision of whether to stay or leave. The results of Carlson's (1977) re-

    search also led her to conclude that the mo re resources a wom an had

    (for example, a job) the more l ikely she was to seek outside intervention

    (p. 459). Similarly, Ag uirre (1985) teste d fou r an tec ed en t variables and fo ur

    covar iates to examine which inf luenced the decis ion of whether to return

    to the abuser. The only variable which affected this decision was a wo ma n's

    economic dependence on her husband.

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    3/24

    Advocacy Intervention 3

    Ineffective Community Response I t has been the conclus ion of many

    studies tha t women rare ly f ind the help they seek f rom their communit ies

    when t ry ing to end the abuse in the i r l ives (Dobash, Dobash, & Cavanagh,

    1985; Donato & Bowker, 1984; Dutton, 1987; Ford, 1983; Gondolf, 1988;

    Hofeller, 1982; Kuhl, 1982; Martin, 1989; Schulman, 1979). Women have

    repor ted needing many community resources , inc luding ass is tance f rom the

    police, the legal system, counseling, the health-care system, and social serv-

    ice agencies. Schulman (1979) discovered that help was received in only 1

    of 12 cases where bat tered women sought i t . Hofel ler (1982) found that

    96 of the wo m en in her s tudy had sought legal services; of these wom en,

    40 we re m ode rately or com pletely dissatisf ied with the services they re-

    ce ived. O f the 52 that had ca l led the pol ice for help, 82 were mo der-

    ately or completely dissatisf ied. I t is therefore not surprising that so many

    bat tered women, unable to f ind the help they need to l ive on thei r own,

    feel forced to remain with or return to their assailants.

    Social Isolation~Lack of Social Support

    In addition to finding little, if

    any, he lp f rom formal community sources , ba t tered women of ten f ind no

    support from their family or fr iends (Dobash & Dobash, 1979; Kuhl, 1982;

    Martin, 1976). Th e cultural value of the wife keeping the m arriage tog ethe r

    at al l costs , together with many people 's reluctance to get involved in do-

    mestic affairs , combine to pressure women into remaining in abusive rela-

    t ionsh ips . Converse ly , women who have

    r e p o r t e d r e c e i v i n g h e l p f r o m

    relatives or fr iends have rated i t as very important to their being able to

    leave their assailants (Bowker, 1984; Donato & Bowker, 1984).

    There is increasing evidence that supportive social networks contrib-

    ute to posit ive psychological well-being. Supportive fr iends can provide

    needed emotional and mater ia l suppor t dur ing t raumat ic t imes , which can

    red uce the r isk of becom ing i ll due to overstress (Gottl ieb, 1981; Hou se,

    1981; Mitchell and Hodson, 1983; Mitchell & Trickett , 1980). Further,

    Mitchell & Hodson (1983) found that lack of informal social support was

    re la ted to more severe depress ive symptoms in bat tered women.

    i mi ta t i ons o f Prev i ous Res earch

    Although numerous s tudies have been conducted on the dynamics

    and effec ts of wo ma n bat ter ing, they tend to have m ajor methodological

    weaknesses. These weaknesses l imit our abil i ty to draw definit ive conclu-

    sions about the factors influencing women's abil i t ies to escape abusive part-

    ners . Al though community resources have been hypothes ized to inf luence

    a wo man 's abi li ty to end her par tner 's v io lence , a thorough search of pub-

    lished studies over the last 17 years has fai led to uncover even one experi-

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    4/24

    312 Sullivan Tan Basta Rumptz and Davidson

    mental s tudy des igned to increase the avai labi l i ty of such resources to ba t-

    t e r e d w o m e n . To u n d e r s t a n d c l e ar ly t h e d y n a m ic p r o c e s s i n vo lv e d f o r

    wo m en cop ing wi th abusive pa rtne rs , exper imen ta l , long i tud inal s tud ies a re

    critical.

    The C urrent R es ea rch

    This a r t i c le p resen ts the in i t i a l f ind ings o f a 10 -week in te rven t ion

    des igned to p rov ide pos t she l te r advocacy se rv ices to w om en w i th abus ive

    par tners . This research is unique in tha t i t u t i l izes a longi tudinal , exper-

    imen ta l des ign to examine the e f fec t s o f an advocacy in te rven t ion wi th a

    sample of wom en with abusive par tners . Specifical ly, th is resea rch tes ted

    th e h y p o th e s e s t h a t ( 1 ) b a t t e r e d w o m e n w o u ld b e in n e e d o f n u m e r o u s

    resources upon the ir shel ter ex i t ; (2) working with advocates would increase

    wo me n ' s e f fec t iveness in ob ta in ing needed resources and socia l suppor t ;

    and (3) success in obta in ing resources and socia l support would increase

    women ' s l eve l o f l i f e sa t i s fac t ion and dec rease the i r r i sk o f fu r the r abuse .

    Th e s tudy was based o n the pre l im inary f indings of a p i lo t s tudy (Sul l ivan ,

    1991; Sul l ivan Davids on, 1991) and was pre dica ted on an ecologica l

    in tervent ion approach. The ecologica l approach to socia l problems is based

    o n th e e n v i r o n m e n ta l r e s o u r c e s c o n c e p t io n o f h u m a n b e h a v io r, w h ic h

    s t re sses tha t a l l ind iv idua ls have the r igh t to communi ty re sources ( see

    Dav idson Ra ppa por t , 1978). This is the f i rs t ins ta l lme nt in a la rger s tudy

    examining the effec ts of such an in tervent ion over a per iod of 2 years .

    M E T H O D

    R es ea rch P a r t i c i pa nt s

    Recruitment

    All re sea rch pa r t ic ipan ts were rec ru i ted f rom a ba t te red

    wo me n ' s she l te r loca ted in a med ium -s ized c ity in the Midwes t . On e p ro jec t

    s taff m em be r w as responsib le fo r locat ing shel ter res id ents (by dai ly v isi ts

    to the she l te r ) and exp la in ing the p ro jec t to them. Al l women who s tayed

    a t the she l te r 1 n igh t o r more and who d id no t move ou t o f the genera l

    v ic in ity we re co nsidere d e l ig ib le for the projec t , regardless of wh eth er o r

    no t they re tu rned to the i r a ssa i lan ts . Po ten t ia l pa r t ic ipan ts were to ld tha t ,

    should t hey agree to par t ic ipa te , th ey would be in terv iewed s ix t imes af te r

    the i r she l te r ex i t - - imm edia te ly upon exi t, 10 weeks th e rea f t e r (pos t -in te r-

    vent ion) , and a t 6 , 12 , 18 , and 24 months post in tervent ion . Women were

    to ld tha t in terv iews wou ld las t approximate ly 1 .5 hr in a locat ion co nven ient

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    5/24

    dvocacy Intervention

    313

    for them and that they would be paid for all interviews. Dollar increments

    were increased per interview to encourage continued participation.

    Potential participants were also told that half of the women being

    interviewed would also receive the free services of a trained advocate for

    10 weeks, 4 to 6 hr per week, after their shelter stay. It was explained that,

    due to limited project resources, only half of the women would receive

    advocates and that this selection would be done randomly.

    During the 13 months of recruitment for this study, 301 women were

    residents of the shelter. Thirteen percent stayed less than a day and were

    not spoken to about the project. Twenty-one percent planned to leave the

    general vicinity and were not eligible for the project. Nine percent ex-

    pressed an interest in the project but could not be found after their shelter

    exit. Three women were incarcerated immediately upon their exit, one en-

    tered an inpatient drug rehabilitation program, and two spoke no English.

    Only 7 of the eligible shelter residents declined to participate in the pro-

    ject. One hundred forty-six women completed initial interviews.

    In order to be considered a research participant, women had to be

    involved in the study for a minimum of 3 weeks. This time period was

    chosen in order to give women working with advocates adequate time to

    get acquainted and begin working. Of the 146 initial study participants,

    four women ended their participation within the first 2 weeks, and one

    woman was murdered 1 week into the intervention. Data presented are

    based on the 141 remaining participants.

    Condition Assignment. All project participants were interviewed within

    a week upon their shelter exit. Most interviews were conducted in women's

    homes, and all were conducted in private rooms where conversation could

    not be overheard. Immediately upon completion of the first interview, the

    interviewer opened a sealed envelope which indicated whether the woman

    would receive the services of an advocate. The interviewer did not know

    to which group a woman would be assigned until after the interview was

    completed, decreasing the risk of selection or coding bias. Group selection

    was random, stratifying for order and for whether or not a woman was

    romantically involved with her assailant) Women who were assigned to the

    experimental condition began working with their advocates within the week.

    Women assigned to the control condition were not contacted again until

    their subsequent interview 10 weeks later.

    Demographics. Forty-five percent of the study participants were

    White. Forty-three percent were Black, 8 were Hispanic, 1 were Asian

    3As invo lv eme nt wi th assa i l an t had a h igh po ten t i a l f o r in f luenc ing a wo ma n s overa l l

    a d j u s t m e n t o v e r ti m e , it w a s i m p o r t a n t t o e n s u r e t h a t e q u a l n u m b e r s o f w o m e n i n t h i s

    s i tua t ion be inc luded in each cond i t ion .

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    6/24

    314 Sullivan Tan Basta Rumptz and Davidson

    American, and the remainder were Native American, Arab American, or

    of mixed heritage. Ages ranged from 17 to 61 years of age, with a mean

    of 28.5 years. All but 22 of the women had at least one child living with

    them.

    Eighty-two percent were unemployed, and 81 were receiving some

    type of governmental assistance. Sixty-four percent had completed high

    school or had obtained a graduate equivalency degree. Thirty-one percent

    of the participants had at least some college experience.

    The mean length of stay at the shelter had been 17 days (range = 1-

    45,

    SD

    = 12.3). Before arriving at the shelter, a third of the women had

    been married to and living with their assailants. An additional 44 had

    been living with their assailants but were not married. Six percent of the

    women were romantically involved with their assailants but were not living

    together, and 15 were no longer involved with their partners at the time

    of the last assault (either separated, divorced, or no longer dating). The

    participants were demographically similar to the samples of other studies

    (Berk, Newton, & Berk, 1986; Finn, 1985; Gondolf, 1988; Greaves et al.,

    1988; Hilbert & Hilbert, 1984; Mitchell & Hodson, 1983; Okun, 1986; Page-

    low, 1981; Schutte et al., 1988; Stacey & Shupe, 1983), indicating that they

    are representative of women who utilize domestic violence shelters. Table I

    provides a breakdown of these demographic variables for all project par-

    ticipants, by condition assignment.

    Over two-thirds of the sample (79 ) reported at least one separation

    from their assailants prior to their arrival at the shelter, with one woman

    reporting as many as 216 prior separations. Nineteen percent of the women

    had left at least 10 times in the past (range = 0-216, X = 7.3, me-

    dian = 3). Violence against the women in the prior six months was quite

    severe, ranging from being pushed (94 ) to being raped (48 ) and/or

    threatened with a gun or a knife (38 ). Injuries sustained during this same

    time period ranged from cuts and bruises (87 ), strains and sprains (40 ),

    and broken bones or fractures (21 ) to loose or broken teeth (9 ) and

    knife or gunshot wounds (4 ). These findings resemble results from pre-

    vious studies (e.g., Dobash & Dobash, 1979; Pagelow, 1981; Sullivan, 1991)

    and are considered typical of this shelter's residents.

    Three-fourths of the sample had called the police at least once in the

    last 6 months, and 40 had sought medical attention. Over half of the

    women who had known their assailants at least 6 months reported that the

    violence within that time period had grown more severe.

    Homogeneity of Conditions The women in the control condition were

    compared with the experimental group to ensure that they were not sig-

    nificantly different at the outset. To this end, parametric and chi square

    statistics were performed on the following demographic variables: race, age,

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    7/24

    dvocacy

    Intervent ion 3 5

    num ber of chi ldren, em ploym ent s ta tus , whether receiving governmen ta l

    assistance, education level , whether currently a student, access to a car,

    number of days at the shelter , severi ty of abuse, length of relat ionship with

    assailant, and nu m be r of previous separations. Th e only significant differ-

    ence (a tp < .05) was mo re employed wom en in the control condi t ion than

    in the ex perime ntal con dit ion (26 vs 10 ) . Given prior studies ' tentative

    suppor t for the corre la t ion between employment and abi l i ty to escape abu-

    sive partners, this f inding suggests that women in the control condit ion may

    have init ial ly had an advantage over women in the experimental condit ion.

    However, given the l ikelihood of detecting one significant difference of 12

    tests conducted, there was no stat ist ically rel iable evidence to reject the

    hypothes is tha t the two groups were comparable overa l l .

    The n tervent i on

    Training of Advocates Advoca tes were female undergradua tes re -

    cruited from a large Midwestern universi ty. They agreed to enroll for two

    consecut ive terms of a comm unity psychology course , through which they

    earned college credits . Advocates received extensive training in empathy

    and active listening skills, facts surrounding woman battering, and strategies

    for generating, mobilizing, and accessing community resources during the

    first term of this course. After training, advocates received 2 hr of super-

    vis ion weekly and were required to work 4-6 hr per week with or on behalf

    of their clients. I t canno t be overem phasize d that th e intervention foc used

    on making the community more responsive in the deliverance and distr i-

    bution of l imited and/or inaccessible resources. An instruction manual was

    developed for the course which explains training in more detail (Sull ivan,

    1989).

    A to ta l o f 69 advoca tes pa r t i c ipa ted in th is p ro jec t . Com ple te da ta

    on 67 advoc a tes ind ica ted tha t they were p r imar ily upperc lassw om en

    (43 jun io rs and 48 sen io rs ) wi th above -averag e g rade-p o in t ave r -

    ages (X = 2 .79 on the s tandard univers i ty 1 .0-4 .0 sca le ; range = 1 .82-

    3 .92) . Ages ranged f rom 19 to 39 , wi th a mean o f 21 .8 and a mode o f

    20. S light ly over ha l f (61 ) were psycho logy majors , wi th o the r ma jo rs

    d i s t r ibu ted ac ross man y f i elds. Typ ical o f the un ive rs i ty 's popu la t ion ,

    t h e ma j o r i t y o f t h e a d v o c a t e s wa s W h i t e ( 8 1 ) , f o l l o we d b y B l a c k

    ( 1 3 ) , H i s p a n i c ( 2 ) , a n d As i a n Am e r i c a n ( 2 ) . T we l v e p e r c e n t o f

    the advo ca tes ind ica ted tha t they had b een abu sed a t l eas t once by an

    i n t ima t e p a r t n e r , a n d 7 6 k n e w o f a t l e a st o n e o t h e r wo m a n wh o h a d

    b e e n b a t t e r e d .

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    8/24

    316 Sullivan Tan Basta Rumptz and Davidson

    b--

    v

    ~ ~ ~

    ~ 0 0 0

    t -I

    I I I I I I

    ~D

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    9/24

    A d v o c a c y I n t e r v e n t i o n 3 1 7

    o

    o

    t~

    N

    ~ o q

    cd

    ~ r~ cq

    o ~ ~ ~

    = 2

    , , . . o o ~ o ~ ~

    ~ ~ Z

    O

    O

    E

    II

    o

    o E

    fl3

    U'3

    I

    t~3

    tt3

    ~f3

    _=

    ,.Q

    E

    Z

    t ~

    I

    oO

    o

    O

    Z

    I]

    II

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    10/24

    318 Sullivan Tan Basta Rumptz and Davidson

    The Intervention Process

    The intervention can be viewed as comprising

    five distinct phases: assessment, initiation of the intervention, monitoring,

    secondary advocacy strategies, and terminat ion (Davidson Rappaport,

    1978; Melton, 1983).

    Assessment

    was the process by which the advocate be-

    came acquainted with her client and the significant others in the client's

    environment (family, friends, etc.). This was the information-gathering stage,

    during which the project participant and advocate decided upon those goals

    they would like to accomplish during their time together.

    The assessment phase then naturally led into

    initiating the intervention

    Specifically, once an unmet need had been identified it was the role of the

    community advocate to help generate and mobilize those community resources

    necessary to meet that need. This included brainstorming possible resources,

    locating critical individuals within agencies or systems who held those re-

    sources, and devising strategies to access said resources. This phase involved

    making phone calls, obtaining printed materials, applying for resources in per-

    s o n - any methods which would aid in creating positive change.

    The third phase was to

    monitor

    the success of the implemented in-

    tervention. The advocate and woman with whom she worked examined if

    the resource had been obtained and if that resource was satisfactory in

    meeting the unmet need. If it was not, the advocate initiated a

    secondary

    advocacy effort

    in this area, with the goal of meeting the client's need more

    adequately.

    Termination

    began at about week 7 of the 10-week intervention. Dur-

    ing this phase the advocate intensified her efforts of transferring to her

    client the knowledge she had learned during training in how to make the

    community more responsive. The advocate gradually played less and less

    of a role in intervention activities to ensure that each project participant

    had the necessary information needed to access resources on her own after

    the program had ended.

    While the process of advocacy intervention has been explained here

    as five discrete stages for clarification purposes, in reality advocates en-

    gaged in various phases simultaneously. For instance, assessment was a con-

    tinuous process, as additional areas of unmet need arose throughout the

    10 weeks. Hence, multiple interventions were implemented at various

    points so that, for example, the advocate may have been monitoring one

    intervention effort while initiating another.

    M e a s u r e s

    The study employed preexisting measures as well as those created

    specifically for this research project. They were chosen or constructed to

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    11/24

    Advocacy Intervention 3 9

    examine the interrelat ionships among all variables present in the concep-

    tual framework of this research. Specifically, instruments measured were

    as follows:

    (1 ) T h o s e p s y c h o e m o t i o n a l v a r i a b le s h y p o t h e s i z e d b y p r e v i o u s

    research to be af fected by battering: depression, fea r and anxiety,

    locus of control , em ot ional a t tach me nt to assa ilant, and se l f-

    efficacy.

    (2) W om en's possess ion of resources perceived to be ins t rumenta l in

    determining success in escaping abuse: housing, legal assistance,

    educat ion, employment , f inances , t ranspor ta t ion, medical care ,

    child care, issues regarding children, social support, and material

    goods.

    (3) In tervent ion effec ts , specif ica l ly the degree to which desi red

    resources and socia l suppor t were obta ined.

    (4) O ut co m e variables, specifically the ex tent of psychological and

    physical violence in participants' lives over time, level of depression,

    fea r and anx ie ty , locus o f con t ro l , emo t iona l a t t ach m ent to

    assa i lant , se l f -ef f icacy, level of socia l suppor t , and perceived

    overall psychological well-being.

    In ord er to me asure involvem ent with assailant , each part icipant

    was asked, a t each of the assessment per iods , what her current re la t ionship

    was wi th her assa ilant . Wo m en were considered to be involved wi th the i r

    assailants if they were (1) m arried and living together , (2) living toge ther ,

    unmarried, (3) romantically involved, not l iving together, or (4) dating.

    Emotional attachment was m eas ured by a 13-item, true -fa lse scale devel-

    oped for this study. I tems included such statements as

    I

    don't think I could

    f ind anothe r m an to love the way I love him and I try to see only the

    best in him. I te m -to tal correlat ions ranged from .35 to .65, with an alpha

    of .84.

    Exper ience of

    physical abuse

    was measured by a modif ied vers ion of

    Straus ' (1979) Conflict-Tactics Scale Violence subscale, found in this study

    to have an internal co nsistency of .90. Tw o items we re dr opp ed from this

    scale ( burne d and drove recklessly so tha t you fe lt endan gered ) due

    to lack o f variance. T he Index of Psychological Abu se was specifically de-

    veloped for this study and is a 33-item measure of r idicule, harassment,

    and cr i t ic ism exper ienced. Women were asked, for example , how of ten in

    the last 6 m onth s (1 = never to 4 = often) their assailants had called yo u

    nam es and cri ticized you r intel ligence. Internal consistency of this scale

    was .97, with i tem-total correlat ions ranging from .51 to .90.

    Depression was assessed by the CES-D (Radloff , 1977), a self-report

    checklist of psychological distress within the gene ral po pulatio n (coefficient

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    12/24

    320 Sullivan Tan Basta Rumptz and Davidson

    alpha = .88).

    Long term fear and anxiety

    was me asured by the f i rst 40 i tems

    of the Ki lpatr ick 's (1988) Ra pe Afterm ath Sym ptom Test (RA ST). This

    scale 's internal consistency was .94, with i tem -to tal correlat ions ranging

    from .33 to .68.

    Self efficacy

    i tems were created specifically for this study. Three hy-

    pothet ica l s i tua t ions were developed to examine what each woman would

    specifically do to obtain inexpensive furniture, a new job, and a new ho me .

    Women were asked in an open-ended fashion to expla in what exact ly they

    would do (or instruct a fr iend to do) in these si tuations, how effective they

    thought these s t ra tegies would be in meet ing thei r goals (on a 7-point

    scale) , and how confident they were in their abil i t ies to engage in the men-

    tioned behaviors (on a 7-point scale) . Internal consistency of this six-i tem

    scale was .78, with item-total correlations ranging from .46 to .61.

    Locus

    of control was measured by Levenson 's (1972) In ternal-Powerful Others-

    Chance ( IPC) scale , which has been used in pr ior research wi th bat tered

    wom en. T he In ternal subscale of this sca le was drop ped f rom analyses due

    to low internal rel iabil i ty. The Powerful Others subscale was combined with

    the Chance subscale (due to high intercorrelat ions) to create an External

    subscale, with alpha = .83 and i te m -tot al correlat ions ranging from .24 to

    .56.

    Effectiveness in obtaining resources

    was assessed, post in tervent ion, in

    11 areas : housing, mater ia l goods and resources , educat ion, employment ,

    heal th , chi ld care , t ranspor ta t ion , socia l suppor t , legal ass is tance , f i -

    nances , and issues regarding the chi ldren. Response ca tegor ies were in

    the form of a Like r t - typ e scale , ranging f rom 1 = very ineffec t ive to

    4 = ve ry e f fec tive . The Ef fec t iveness o f Obta in ing Re sou rces (E O R )

    scale was then ob ta ined fo r each wom an by ca lcu lat ing the mean o f he r

    se l f - repor t perceived effec t iveness scores across a l l a reas in which she

    worked . In te rna l cons is tency o f the Ef fec t iveness o f Obta in ing Res ourc es

    scale was .64.

    Social support was assessed by a measure developed by Bogat , Chin ,

    Sabbath, and Schwartz (1983), which has a coefficient alpha of .87. This

    ins t rument me asured the perceived quant i ty and quali ty of wo me n 's overa l l

    social support , as well as specific domains of support: companionship, ad-

    vice and information, practical assistance, and emotional support .

    Overall

    psychological well being was measured by a shor tened vers ion of Andrews &

    Withey's (1976) Quali ty of Life measure. Twenty-five i tems measuring feel-

    ings about respondents ' interpersonal relat ionships, self , neighborhood, and

    overall well-being were selected to predict overall quali ty of l ife (coefficient

    alpha = .90, ite m -to ta l corre lations ranging fro m .30 to .65). Tw o examples

    of such i tems were Ho w do you feel about your life overa l l? and H ow do

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    13/24

    dvocacy Intervention

    321

    you feel about the amount of fun and enjoyment you have? Response

    categories ranged from 1 = terrible to 7 = extremely pleased. 4

    Interviewer Training

    Undergraduate women received college credits in exchange for con-

    ducting interviews for this project. All interviewers made a commitment to

    work at least two 10-week terms, as part of a community psychology course

    in which they learned community research techniques. Training included

    gaining in-depth familiarity with all interviews, conducting mock interviews,

    and learning proper coding procedures. New groups of five to seven inter-

    viewers received training every 3 months so that at any time trained inter-

    viewers were available to conduct project interviews.

    Interrater Agreement Over a period of 1 year and 7 months, or seven

    college terms, a total of 32 interviewers received training. On average, five

    new interviewers were trained every 4 months, and each interviewer worked

    for the project for 6 months. Interrater agreement was calculated at the

    completion of the 5-week mandatory training period for all seven groups

    of interviewers. A percentage-agreement score was calculated after all in-

    terviewers coded the same in-person mock interview. Due to the extensive

    nature of training and the fact that the vast majority of interview questions

    was closed-ended, interrater agreement was consistently high. On average,

    the percentage agreement calculation was 97%.

    To ensure that all interviewers continued to code correctly over time,

    tapes of completed interviews were randomly assigned to interviewers to

    recode. Again, interrater agreement was consistently above 97%.

    RESULTS

    Resources Women Reported Needing fter Leaving the Shelter

    At the preinterview each woman was presented with 11 areas of pos-

    sible unmet need and asked if she thought she would want to see change

    in any of them in the upcoming 10 weeks. She was then asked if there was

    anything else she would want to be working on (Other). The category most

    often chosen by women (84%) was obtaining material goods or services (i.e.,

    furniture, clothing, a plumber), followed by social support (79%) and edu-

    cation (71%). Ten of the eleven categories (material goods and services,

    4 C o m p l e t e m e a s u r e s a r e a v a i l a b l e f r o m t h e f i r s t a u t h o r

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    14/24

    322 Sullivan Tan, Bas ta , Rumptz and Davidson

    education, transportation, f inances, legal assistance, health issues, social sup-

    por t , e mplo yme nt , ch i ld care , and issues regarding the chi ldren) were chos en

    b y o v e r h a l f o f t h e r e s p o n d e n t s , s u p p o r t i n g t h e a r g u m e n t t h a t b a t t e r e d

    women who use she l te r s a re in need o f many se rv ices when a t tempt ing to

    leave the ir assa ilants . A s izable minori ty of the w om en a lso indica ted a nee d

    to work on hous ing (39 ) . 5 There was on e s ign i fican t d i f fe rence be tw een

    the exper imen ta l and con t ro l g roups wi th re spec t to wha t re sources they

    repor ted need ing upon the i r exi t f rom the she l ter : wo me n in the exper imen-

    ta l condi t io n were m ore apt to me nt ion n eeding mate r ia l goods (Z2 = 5 .56,

    df = 1 , p < .05). Table I I provides a brea kdo wn o f the types of resources

    women repor ted need ing immedia te ly upon she l te r ex i t .

    The ntervention Process

    Da ta f rom in te rv iews wi th wom en w ho rece ived advocacy se rv ices in-

    d ica ted tha t pa r t ic ipan ts genera l ly saw the i r advoca tes twice a week . They

    spen t an ave rage o f 6.9 h r pe r week wi th them in pe rson (mod e = 6 h r )

    and an add i t iona l 2.5 h r pe r week on the phone . A ful l 97 o f the p ro jec t

    pa r t ic ipan ts repor ted be ing somewha t (4 ) o r ve ry (93 ) sa t is f ied wi th

    the p rogram, and 99 foun d i t to have been he lp fu l to them.

    Data f rom advoca tes ' p rogress repor t s revea led tha t advoca tes ca l led

    resource p rov ide rs an ave rage o f 22 t imes th roughou t the i r in te rven t ions

    (SD = 14.1 ) and tha t they p rov ided wom en wi th wr i t t en in fo rmat io n an

    average of 15 t imes (SD = 9 .8). Advoc ates were less like ly to con tac t re-

    source p rov ide rs in pe rson , ave rag ing seven t imes th ro ugh ou t the i r 10 -week

    interven t ions (SD = 6 .7).

    Resources Women Tried To Access During the post in terv iew, par t ic i -

    p a n t s w e r e a s k e d w h e th e r t h e y h a d wanted to work in va r ious a reas and

    whe the r they in fac t

    had

    worked in these areas . As was t rue a t the in i t ia l

    p re in te rv iew, more women in the exper imen ta l g roup expressed tha t they

    h a d w a n te d t o w o r k o n o b t a in in g m a te r i a l g o o d s c o m p a r e d t o w o m e n in

    the contro l group (85 vs 64 ; Z2 = 8.03, df = 1, p < .05). A dd itio na lly ,

    m o r e w o m e n in t h e e x p e r im e n ta l g r o u p m e n t io n e d w a n t in g t o h a v e w o r k e d

    on housin g (70 vs 52 ; Zz = 4.85, df = 1, p < .05) while mo re wo m en in

    the con t ro l g roup wan ted to ob ta in hea l th ca re (79 vs 54 ; Z2 = 9.32,

    d f = 1, p < .05).

    5It is l ikely that housing was chosen by only 39 of the respo nden ts because ini tia l interviews

    were con duc ted a f te r wom en h ad le f t the she l te r and h ad o bta ined p laces of res idence . This

    number should not be used to minimize the diff icul ty many women have f inding housing

    post-shel ter (especial ly low-income housing) . This percentage would undoubtedly have been

    much higher had the interview taken place when women were s t i l l in the shel ter .

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    15/24

    Advocacy Intervention 323

    Table II Resources Women Reported Needing Immediately Upon

    Shelte r Exit

    Percentage

    Expt. Control Tot al

    Ma terial good s 92 77 84*

    Social sup por t 80 77 79

    Edu cation 70 71 71

    Health 70 69 70

    Child car e 63 70 67a

    Issues for kids 67 65 66a

    Finances 69 59 63

    Em ploym ent 62 63 62

    Legal issues 62 61 62

    Tran sportatio n 61 56 58

    Housing 45 33 39

    Oth er 24 23 23

    Note

    Immediately upon exit ing the shelter, women were asked

    whether they thought they would be working on any of 12 areas.

    Th e are as are presen ted in the ord er in which they were chosen m ost

    frequently.

    a Refers to the percen tage of the m others in the sample.

    *Significant at p < .05.

    O f t h e w o m e n w h o m e n t i o n e d h a v in g w a n t e d t o w o r k o n o b t a i n in g

    v a r i o u s r e s o u r c e s , w o m e n w i t h a d v o c a t e s w e r e m o r e l ik e ly a c t u a ll y t o h a v e

    w o r k e d i n 6 o f t h e 11 a re a s . T h e s ix a r e a s w e r e e d u c a t i o n , e m p l o y m e n t ,

    r e s o u r c e s f o r t h e i r c h i l d r e n , f i n a n c i a l is s ue s , c h i ld c a r e , a n d s o c i a l s u p p o r t

    ( s e e T a b l e I I I) . A n o t h e r n o t a b l e d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n t h e t w o g r o u p s w a s

    t h a t , i n 8 o f t h e 1 1 a r e a s , 1 0 0 o f t h e w o m e n i n t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l g r o u p

    w h o h a d w a n t e d t o w o r k o n o b t a i n i n g t h a t r e s o u r c e a c t u a ll y d i d so . T h i s

    w a s n e v e r t h e c a s e fo r w o m e n i n th e c o n t r o l g r o u p .

    M a j o r F i n d i n g s

    Effectiveness in Obtaining Resources

    T o t e s t t h e h y p o t h e s i s t h a t

    w o m e n in t he e x p e r i m e n t a l c o n d i t io n w o u ld b e m o r e

    effective

    i n o b t a i n i n g

    d e s i r e d r e s o u r c e s t h a n w o m e n i n t h e c o n t r o l c o n d i t i o n , a t w o - t a il e d t t e s t

    w a s p e r f o r m e d b e t w e e n t h e t w o g r o u p s , w it h th e E f f e c t i v e n es s i n O b t a i n i n g

    R e s o u r c e s ( E O R ) s c al e a s t h e d e p e n d e n t v a r i a b l e . T h i s te s t r e v e a l e d t h a t

    w o m e n w h o h a d w o r k e d w i t h a d v o c a t e s r e p o r t e d b e i n g m o r e e f f e c t i v e i n

    r e a c h i n g t h e i r g o a l s t h a n w o m e n i n t h e c o n t r o l c o n d i t i o n [t(129 = 5 .1 2 ,

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    16/24

    324 Sullivan Tan Basta Rumptz and Davidson

    0

    0)

    O[

    r ~ .

    0

    O ~ .c~ ~ .~

    0 ~ ~ ~ ~ .~

    O~ ~0 ~ ~ ~ ~

    c~'~. 0 ~ .. ~

    ~ ~ - , -~ ~ '~ ~ . .~-~

    E

    =_

    O

    E

    cD

    ~

    e~

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    17/24

    Advocacy Intervention 3 5

    co2 = .16, p < .05]. Means for the two groups were 2.8 for the control con-

    dition and 3.3 for the experimental group.

    Program Intervention Effects

    A repeated-measures doubly multivariate

    analysis of variance was conducted, with two time periods (pre-post), one

    independent variable (experimental vs control group), and nine outcome

    variables: physical abuse, psychological abuse, depression, fear ' and anxiety,

    locus of control, self-efficacy, emotional attachment to assailant, social sup-

    port, and overall quality of life. A time x intervention interaction effect

    was marginally significant [F(9,1 21 ) --- 1.90, p = .058]; therefore, significant

    univariate tests within the MANOVA were examined.

    Univariate analyses suggested a monotonic interaction between the

    two conditions. At the postinterview, both groups reported significantly

    lower levels of physical abuse, psychological abuse, depression, fear and

    a1~iety, and emotional attachment to their assailants. They also reported

    increased feelings of personal control and mastery and social support and

    an overall higher quality of life. An especially notable effect involved de-

    pression level: at the preinterview a full third of the respondents could be

    classified as severely depressed, according to CES-D classifications. Only

    17 indicated no depression at all. Ten weeks later only 12 were severely

    depressed, while 42 indicated no depression whatsoever.

    While both groups improved significantly on eight of the nine vari-

    ables tested over time, women who received the services of advocates

    showed even greater improvement on two of the nine scales: social support

    [F(2,131) = 11.71, p < .05] and quality of life []7(2 ,131 ) ---- 4.10, p < .05].

    Within the control group, women's feelings about their level of social sup-

    port changed from a mean of 4.57 to 4.59. Within the experimental group,

    the mean increased from 4.86 to 5.50 (7-point scale; 1 = terrible, 7 = ex-

    tremely pleased).

    Similarly, across the first 10 weeks post-shelter, women's perceptions

    of their quality of life increased from a mean of 4.19 to a mean of 4.33 in

    the control group and 4.28 to 4.69 in the experimental group (7-point scale;

    1 = terrible, 7 = extremely pleased). Figure 1 illustrates the monotonic in-

    teraction between the two groups over time through a graphic repre-

    sentation of the changes within social support and quality of life.

    dditional Findings

    Involvement wi th Assailants Upon exit from the shelter, 65 of the

    project participants indicated that they were not involved with or were end-

    ing their relationships with their assailants. At the 10-week interview 88

    of these women were uninvolved with the men who had abused them. Of

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    18/24

    3 2 6 S u l l iv a n T a n B a s t a R u m p t z a n d D a v i d s o n

    Pleased 6.0

    5 . 5

    5 . 0

    M o s t l y

    Satisfied

    4 . 5

    M i x e d 4 . 0

    S S - E

    /

    / /

    Q L - E

    S S - C

    J

    L J

    Q L - C

    l

    S h e l t e r E x i t 1 0 Weeks Post Shelter

    S o c i a l S u p p o r t -

    Experimental

    S o c i a l S u p p o r t -

    Control

    - - - - Q u a l i t y o f L i f e -

    Experimental

    - - Q u a l i t y o f L i f e - Control

    F i g 1

    M o n o t o n i c i n t e ra c t io n b e t w e e n t h e t w o g r o u p s f o r p e r c e iv e d l e v e l o f s o c ia l s u p p o r t

    a n d q u a l i t y o f l i f e o v e r t h e f i rs t 1 0 w e e k s p o s t s h e l t e r . R e s p o n s e s b a s e d o n a 7 - p o in t L ik e r t - t y p e

    s c a le r a n g in g f r o m

    1 =

    terrible to

    7 =

    e x t r e me ly p le a s e d .

    t h e w o m e n w h o in i ti a ll y r e t u r n e d t o t h e i r a s s a il a n ts , 9 0 w e r e s ti ll i n v o l v e d

    w i t h t h e m 1 0 w e e k s l a te r. N o s i g n if ic a n t b e t w e e n - g r o u p d i f f e r e n c e s e x i s t e d

    o n t h i s v a r ia b le .

    Experi ence of A bu se Postshelter

    W h e n p a r t i c i p a n t s w e r e i n t e r v i e w e d

    1 0 w e e k s a f t er t h e i r s h e l t e r e x it , 4 6 r e p o r t e d h a v i n g e x p e r i e n c e d f u r t h e r

    p h y s i c a l a b u s e f r o m th e i r a s s a il a n t s ( 4 0 o f t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l g r o u p ; 5 1

    o f t h e c o n t r o l g r o u p ) . T h e i n c i d e n c e o f p s y c h o l o g ic a l a b u s e w a s s im i la r ,

    h a v i n g b e e n e x p e r i e n c e d b y 4 9 o f t h e s a m p l e ( 4 2 o f t h e e x p e r i m e n t a l

    g r o u p ; 5 6 o f t h e c o n t r o l g r o u p ) . W h i l e t h e p e r c e n t a g e s s u g g e s t t h a t

    w o m e n i n th e c o n t r o l g r o u p e x p e r i e n c e d h i g h e r ra t es o f p h y si c a l a n d p sy -

    ch o lo g i ca l a b u s e , t h e d i f f eren ces w ere n o t s t a ti s ti ca l ly s i g n i f i ca n t (p = . 2 2 5

    f o r p h y s ic a l a b u s e a n d p = . 1 0 0 f o r p s y c h o l o g i c a l a b u s e ) . T a b l e 1 V p r o -

    v i d e s m o r e e x t e n s iv e i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t t h e t y p e s o f v io l e n c e a n d i n j u ri e s

    e x p e r i e n c e d b y t h e s t u d y p a r t i c i p a n t s .

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    19/24

    A d v o c a c y I n t e r v e n t i o n 3 7

    l

    o

    ~

    ~ ~ ~

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    20/24

    328 Sullivan Tan Basta Rum ptz and Davidson

    Women who were involved with their assailants reported the highest

    rates of physical and psychological abuse, with 70 having been physically

    harmed again and 91 psychologically abused. Of those o t involved with

    their assailants, 29 had been assaulted and 20 psychologically abused.

    While women not involved with their assailants experienced much less

    abuse within the first 10 weeks postshelter, it is important to note that

    ending the relationship did not necessarily end the abuse. More than one-

    fourth of the women who had ended their relationships continued to ex-

    perience physical abuse.

    Twenty percent of the women who had been battered again reported

    having needed medical attention, and 44 had called the police at least

    once (range = 0-30 times). Of those who called the police, a third were

    somewhat or very dissatisfied with the police response. Arrests were made

    22 of the time, resulting in one conviction.

    DISCUSSION

    The initial results of this research study supported the hypotheses

    that women would be in need of numerous resources upon their shelter

    exit and that advocates can be effective change agents in helping battered

    women access needed resources. In their initial interviews, conducted

    immediately after leaving the shelter, over half of the research participants

    mentioned needing the following resources: material goods and services,

    education, transportation, finances, legal assistance, health issues, social

    support, employment, child care and issues for their children. Further, in

    the postinterviews conducted 10 weeks later, women working with

    advocates were more likely to have worked on obtaining the resources

    they desired and reported greater success in acquiring those resources.

    Ninety-three percent of all women working with advocates also reported

    being very satisfied with the program.

    The longitudinal experimental design of the study allowed for the

    examination of time effects of the intervention. Although 10 weeks is a

    fairly short period of time in which to observe psychological and environ-

    mental fluctuations, initial findings did suggest a monotonic interaction

    effect between the experimental and the control groups. Specifically, while

    all participants reported a decrease in abuse, fear and anxiety, depression,

    and emotional attachment to their assailants, as well as an increase in

    social support and sense of personal control and a higher quality of life,

    women in the experimental group reported being even more pleased than

    the women in the control group with the level of social support in their

    lives and reported having an overall higher quality of life. They also

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    21/24

    dvocacy Intervention 3 9

    reported greater effectiveness in obtaining resources. These findings sug-

    gest two phenomena. First, the average woman exiting a battered women's

    shelter is extremely resilient in spite of further violence and adverse com-

    munity responses. An example of this is the change in women's levels of

    depression across the 10-week time period. At the preinterview a full third

    of the respondents could be classified as severely depressed, according to

    CES-D guidelines. However, within the first 10 weeks postshelter, 42

    indicated no depression at all, and only 12 were severely depressed.

    Second, the provision of extensive, short-term advocacy services appears

    to be beneficial to women exiting domestic violence shelters in the areas

    of social support, perceived quality of life, and perceived ability to access

    resources.

    Initial interviews revealed the severity of psychological and physical

    abuse experienced by the women and the negative impacts of such

    battering on their emotional and psychological well-being. One notable

    finding of this study was that almost half of the sample experienced further

    physical and/or psychological abuse in the first 10 weeks after their shelter

    exit. While the women who were involved with their assailants were more

    likely to have been assaulted (70 ), over one-fourth of the women not

    involved with their ss il nts

    experienced additional physical abuse as well.

    This finding contradicts the assumption that ending the relationship is, in

    and of itself, an effective means of ending the violence. Clearly, women

    continue to need physical protection and assistance from the criminal

    justice system, regardless of their involvement with the men who have

    battered them.

    One aim of this research was to determine what influences a woman's

    ability successfully to end the violence she is experiencing from her partner.

    It is important to stress that no woman should

    h ve

    to be responsible for

    ending her partner's violence. Physical assault is a crime and, as such, falls

    under the jurisdiction of the criminal justice system. Further, batterers

    themselves are responsible for changing their abusive behaviors. Unfortu-

    nately, until such time that a battered woman can count on an effective

    systems-level response to ending male violence against women, the women

    themselves will be forced to use creative, innovative, and sometimes des-

    perate means to escape and/or end their partners' violence.

    This initial installment of the research indicated that working with

    advocates increased a woman's chances of obtaining needed resources and

    social support. However, at the 10-week follow-up assessment there were

    no statistically reliable differences between experimental groups on whether

    women had experienced further abuse. Additional follow-ups are necessary

    to examine the effects of community resources, community response, and

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    22/24

    330 Sul l ivan Tan Basta Rum ptz and Davidson

    s o c i a l s u p p o r t o n w o m e n s d e c i s i o n s t o r e m a i n i n o r le a v e a b u s i v e r e l a t io n -

    s h ip s a n d o n t h e i r s u c c e s s i n r e m a i n i n g f r e e o f t h e ir p a r t n e rs v i o l e n c e .

    R E F E R E N C E S

    Aguirre , B. E . (1985). Why do they re turn: Abused wives in shel ters .

    Social Work, 30,

    350-354.

    An drew s, F . , W ithey, S . (1976). Social indicators o f w ell-being: Am erica n's perceptions o f l i fe

    quality.

    NY: P lenum Press .

    Berk , R. A. , New ton , P ., Berk , S. (1986) . W hat a d if fe rence a day makes : A n empir ica l

    s tudy o f the impac t o f she l te r s fo r ba t te red women . Journal of Marriage and the Family,

    48, 481-490.

    Bill ings, A . G. , M oos, R. H. (1981). Th e role of copin g respon ses and social resou rces in

    at tenuating the s tress of l i fe events . Journal o f Behavioral Medicine, 4, 139-157.

    Bo gat , G. A. , Ch in, R. , Sabb ath , W ., Schwartz , C. (1983). The Adul t 's Social Support

    Questionnaire (Technical Report 2).

    East Lansing: Michigan State Universi ty .

    Bowker , L . (1984) . Cop ing wi th wife abuse : Pe rsona l and soc ia l ne tworks . In A. R. Rober t s ,

    (Ed.) , Battered w om en a nd their families: Intervention strategies an d treatment programs.

    New York : Spr inger .

    Browne, A. (1980). Comparison of victim's reactions across traumas. P a p e r p r e s e n t e d a t t h e

    Rocky Mounta in Psycho log ica l Assoc ia t ion Annua l Mee t ing , Tucson , AZ .

    Browne, A. (1987). When battered women kill . New York : F ree P ress .

    Ca lho un , K. S ., Atke son , B., Res ick , P . A. (1982) . A long i tud ina l exam ina t ion o f fea r

    reac t ions in v ic tims o f rape . Journal o f Counseling Psychology, 29, 655-661.

    Carlson, B. E . (1977). Battered women and their assai lants . Social Work, 22(6), 455-460.

    Cro nkite , R. C. M oos, R. H. (1982).

    The role of predisposing an d mediating factors in the

    stress-illness relationship. U n p u b l i s h e d m a n u s c r i p t. P a l o A l t o , C A : S o c ia l E c o l o g y

    Labora to ry , D epa r tm en t o f Psychiat ry and Behav io ra l Sc iences, S tan fo rd U nivers i ty and

    V e te r a n A d m in i s t r a t i o n M e d ic a l Ce n t e r s .

    Dav idson , W. S . I I , Rapp apor t , J . (1978). Advo cacy and comm uni ty psycho logy. In G. H.

    W eber , G. J . McC al l , (Eds . ) ,

    Social sc ntists as advocates: Views fro m the applied

    disciplines. Bev erly Hil ls , C A: Sag e.

    Dob ash , R. , Dob ash , R. (1979) . Violence agah ~st wives: A case against the patriarchy. N e w

    York: Free Press .

    Dobash , R. E . , Dobash , R. P ., Cavanagh , K. (1985) . The con tac t be twe en ba t te red wo m en

    and social and medical agencies . In

    Private violence an d pu blic policy.

    L o n d o n : R o u t l e d g e

    and Kegan Pau l .

    Do hrenw end , B. S ., Do hrenw end , B. P . (1981) . Soc ioe nv i ronm enta l fac tors , s tress and

    psychopathology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 129-164.

    D o n a to , K . , Bo w k e r , L . ( 19 84 ). U n d e r s t a n d in g t h e h e lp s e e k ing b e h a v io r o f b a t t e r e d

    women: A compar ison o f t rad i t iona l se rv ice agenc ies and women ' s g roups . International

    Journal of Women's Studies, 7(2), 99-i09.

    D utto n, D. (1987). The cr imina l just ice respon se to wife assault .

    Law and Human Behav ior ,

    11(3), 189-206.

    Finn, J . (1985). The s tresses an d cop ing beha vior of bat te red w om en.

    Social Casework,

    66(6),

    341-349.

    Ford , D . A . (1983). W ife ba t te ry and c r imina l jus t ice : A s tudy o f v ic t im dec is ion-making .

    Family Relations, 32, 463-475.

    Gayford, J . (1978). Battered wives. In J . P . Mart in , (Ed.) , Violence and the family. Chiches te r ,

    Eng land : John Wiley .

    Gelles, R. (1979).

    Family violence.

    Beverly Hil ls , CA: Sage.

    G o n d o l f , E . ( 1 9 8 8 ) .

    Battered wo m en a s survivors: A n alternative to learned helplessness.

    Lexing ton , MA: Lex ing ton Books .

    Gott l ieb , B. H. (Ed.) (1981). Social networks and social support. Beverly Hil ls , CA: Sage.

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    23/24

    Advocacy Intervention 33

    Grea ves, L., Hea py, N., Wylie A. (1988). Adv ocac y services: Reassessin g the profile and

    needs of bat tered women.

    Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health,

    7(2), 39-51.

    Hilb erm an, E. Mun son, K. (1977-1978). Sixty batt ered wom en. Victimology: A n International

    Journal,

    2(3-4), 460-470.

    Hilbert, J. , Hitbert, H. (1984). Battered wo men leaving shelter: Which way do they go?

    Journal of App lied Social Sciences,

    8(2), 292-297.

    Hofeller, K. H. (1982). Soc ia~ psychological and situational factors in wife abuse. Palo Alto,

    CA: R E Resea rch Associates Inc.

    Ho rnu ng, C. A., McC ullough , B. C., Sugim oto, T. (1981). Status relationships in mar riage:

    Risk factors in spouse abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, August, 675-692.

    Ho rto n, A. L., Simonidis, K. M., Simonidis, L.L. (1987). Lega l rem edie s for spouse abuse:

    Victim characteristics, expectations, and satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 2(3),

    265-279.

    House, J. S. (1981). Work Stress and Social Support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Kilpatrick, D. G. (1988) Rap e Afterm ath Symptom Test. In M. Hers en A. S. Bellack (Eds.),

    Dictionary o f behavioral assessment techniques (pp. 366-367). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Kuhl, A. F. (1982). Com mun ity responses to bat tered women. Victimology: International

    Journal,

    7(1-4), 49-59.

    Labell, L. S. (1979). Wife abuse: A sociological study of battered women and their mates.

    Victimology: A n International Journal, 9(3-4), 450-463.

    Levenson, H. (1972). Distinctions within the concept of internal-external locus of control:

    Develop ment o f a new scale. Proceedings of the 80th A nnual Convention of the American

    Psychological Association. (pp. 261-262).

    Martin, D. (1976). Battered wives. San Francisco: Glide.

    Martin, D. (1989). Research note: The response of the clergy to spouse abuse in a suburban

    county, Violence and Victims, 4(3), 217-225.

    Mitch ell, R., Ho dso n, C. (1983). Copin g with dom estic violence : Social supp ort and

    psychological health among battered women. American Journal o f Co mmu nity Psychology,

    11,

    629-654.

    Mitchell, R. E. Tricke tt, E. J. (1980). Social netwo rks as med iators of social supp ort: An

    analysis of the effects and determinants of social networks. Community Mental Health

    Journal, 16, 27-44.

    Okun, L. (1986). Wom an abuse: Facts replacing myths. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Pagelow, M. (1981). Woman battering: Victims and their experiences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Prescott, S., Lesko, C. (1977). Batt ered wom en: A social psychological pers pective. In M.

    Roy (Ed.), Battered women. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Radlo ff, L. S. (1977). The CE S-D scale: A self rep ort d epress ion scale for research in the

    general population.

    Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3),

    385-401.

    Resick, P. A., Vero nen , L. J., Kilpatrick, D. G., Calhoun , K. S., Atke son, B. M. (1986).

    Assessment of fear reactions in sexual assault victims: A factor analytic study of the

    Veronen-Kilpatrick modified fear survey.

    Behavioral Assessment, 8,

    271-283.

    Roberts, A, R. (Ed.) (1984). Battered women and their families: Intervention strategies and

    treatment programs. New York: Springer.

    Rounsaville, B. J. (1978). Theories in marital violence: Evidence from a study of battered

    women.

    Victimology. An International Journal,

    3(1-2), 11-31.

    Roy, M. (Ed.) (1977).

    Battered women: A psychosocial study of battered women.

    New York:

    Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Schulman, M. A. (1979). A survey of spousal violence against women in Kentucky. Lexington:

    Kentucky Commission on Women.

    Schutte, N.S., Malou ff, J. M., Doy le, J. S. (1988). Th e relationsh ip betw een characteristics

    of the vic t im, persuas ive techniques of the bat terer , and re turning to a bat ter ing

    relationship. The

    Journal o f Social Psychology, 128(5),

    605-610.

    Sidel, R. (1986).

    Wom en and children last: The plight o f po or w ome n in affluent America.

    New

    York: Viking.

    Stacey, W. A. Shupe, A. (1983).

    The FamUy Secret.

    Boston: Beacon Press.

  • 8/10/2019 An Advocacy Program for Women

    24/24

    332 Sullivan Tan Basta Rumptz and Davidson

    Straus, M. A. (1979). Me asurin g intrafamily conflict and vio lence: Th e Co nflict Tactics (CT )

    Scales.

    Journal of Marriage and the Family February

    75-88.

    Straus, M., Gelles, R. (1986). Societal chang e and chan ge in family viole nce from 19 75 to

    1985 as revea led by two natio nal surveys.

    Journal of Marriage and the Family 48

    465-479.

    Strube , M., Barb our, L. ~1_983). Th e decision to leave an abusive relationship: Eco no mic

    dependence and psychological commitment .

    Journa l of Marriage and the Family

    November

    785-793.

    Sullivan, C. M. (1989).

    Community Advocacy Project training manual.

    Unpublished manuscript,

    East Lansing: Michigan State University.

    Sullivan, C. M. (1991). The provision of advocacy services to women leaving abusive partners:

    An exploratory study. Journal o f Interpersonal kiolence 6(1), 45-54.

    Sullivan, C. M., David son, W.S., II. (1991). Brie f Rep ort: The prov ision of advoc acy services

    to women leaving abusive partners: An examination of short- term effects. American

    Journal of Community Psychology

    19(6), 953-960.

    Walker, L. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper and Row.

    Walker, L. (1983). The battered woman syndrome study. D. Finkelhor, (Ed.), The dark side

    of families.

    Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Walker, L. (1984).

    The battered woman syndrome.

    New York: Springer.

    Walke r, L. (1985). Psychological impac t of the criminalization o f dome stic violenc e on victims.

    Victimology: An International Journal 19(1-4), 281-300.