amr research at the agricultural research service · environmental amr mitigation strategies....
TRANSCRIPT
AMR Research at theAgricultural Research Service
Develop antimicrobial-resistance solutions for healthy people, healthy animals and a healthy environment
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research ServiceUnited States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research ServiceUnited States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
Roxann Motroni DVM, PhDNational Program Leader for Animal HealthOffice of National ProgramsAgricultural Research Service
Kim Cook, PhDNational Program Leader for Food SafetyOffice of National ProgramsAgricultural Research Service
Overview of ARS• More than 90 locations (4 overseas
labs)• $1.2B budget in FY18• 16 National Programs
• ~690 research projects • ~1,600 scientists• ~8,000 employees
• 25 ongoing projects in AMR• FY17 Funding ~$21.5M
• Antibiotic Drug Resistance and Antimicrobial Resistance (Food Safety Funding) (AMR) - $13,925,000
• Antibiotic and Antimicrobial Resistance (Non-Food Safety Funding) - $3,608,000
• Alternative to Antibiotics (Non-Food Safety Funding) (ATA) - $3,954,000
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
Four National Program Areas
Nutrition, Food Safety and Quality
Animal Production and Protection Crop Production and Protection
Natural Resources and Sustainable Agriculture Systems
• Water Availability and Watershed Management
• Soil and Air
• Biorefining
• Grass, Forage, and Rangeland Agroecosystems
• Sustainable Agricultural Systems Research
• Food Animal Production
• Animal Health
• Veterinary, Medical, and Urban Entomology
• Aquaculture
• Plant Genetic Resources, Genomics, and Genetic Improvement
• Plant Diseases
• Crop Protection and Quarantine
• Crop Production
• Human Nutrition
• Food Safety (Animal and Plant Products)
• Quality and Utilization of Agricultural Products
ARS Mission and role in AMR Research
• ARS Mission:• ARS delivers scientific solutions to national and global agricultural challenges.
• ARS Role in AMR Research• ARS contributes solution oriented, hypothesis-driven research that benefits
agriculture and ensures safe, secure food supply• Perform basic and applied research that informs through peer-review publication,
subject matter expertise and information sharing
https://www.ars.usda.gov/nutrition-food-safetyquality/food-safety-animal-and-plant-products/docs/antimicrobial-resistance-amr/
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
ARS Researches many areas of AMR in Agriculture
Natural Resources and Agriculture Systems (NRSAS)
Nutrition, Food Safety and Quality (NFSQ)
Animal Production and Protection (APP)
Nutrition, Food Safety and Quality (NFSQ)
Animal Production and Protection (APP)
USDA Antimicrobial Resistance Action Plan (2014)
• Objective 1: Determine and/or model patterns, purposes, and impacts of antibiotic use in food-producing animals.
• Objective 2: Monitor antibiotic drug susceptibilities of selected bacterial organisms in food-producing animals, production environments, and meat and poultry.
• Objective 3: Identify feasible management practices, alternatives to antibiotic use, and other mitigations to reduce AMR associated with food-producing animals and their production environments.
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
Research Highlights from USDA AMR Action Plan
• Objective 1: Determine and/or model patterns, purposes, and impacts of antibiotic use in food-producing animals.
• Objective 2: Monitor antibiotic drug susceptibilities of selected bacterial organisms in food-producing animals, production environments, and meat and poultry.
• Objective 3: Identify feasible management practices, alternatives to antibiotic use, and other mitigations to reduce AMR associated with food-producing animals and their production environments.
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
Mitigation Approaches for Foodborne Pathogens in Cattle and Swine for Use During Production and Processing
National Program 108: Food Safety, US Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE
• Demonstrated that a 5-day in-feed prophylactic chlortetracycline treatment reduced illness in cattle entering feedlot with no long-term impacts on levels of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes (Miller et al., 2018)
• Examined the fecal contents of 360 fed cattle raised "conventionally" (no restrictions on antibiotic use other than regulatory compliance) and 359 fed cattle "raised without antibiotics". Individual antibiotic resistance levels were either similar between production systems or slightly elevated in conventional cattle. (Vikram et al., 2017)
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
Reduction of Invasive Salmonella enterica in Poultry through Genomics, Phenomics and Field Investigations of Small Multi-Species Farm Environments
National Program 108: Food Safety, US. National Poultry Research Center, Athens, GA
• Examining antibiotic-free, pastured poultry management systems (Rothrock et al., 2015)
• Even without antibiotics, foodborne pathogens (namely Salmonella and Listeria) isolated from various points along the farm-to-fork continuum are MDR, with some resistant to up to 7 ABs (using the NARMS panels).
• Ongoing work includes collaborations with UGA and UCDavis to examine (1) if number/type of other farm animals on the farm or the concentrations of metals within the feces/soil are correlated with resistance on these AB-free farms and (2) using GIS to geospatially and temporally map these resistances from the 11 farms studied over 4 years.
Research Highlights from USDA AMR Action Plan
• Objective 1: Determine and/or model patterns, purposes, and impacts of antibiotic use in food-producing animals.
• Objective 2: Monitor antibiotic drug susceptibilities of selected bacterial organisms in food-producing animals, production environments, and meat and poultry.
• Objective 3: Identify feasible management practices, alternatives to antibiotic use, and other mitigations to reduce AMR associated with food-producing animals and their production environments.
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
Highlight: ARS On-Farm Pilot Studies• Technology development: DARTE-QM (Diversity of Antibiotic
Resistance genes and Transfer Elements-Quantitative Monitoring)• A high-throughput DNA sequencing method to sequence hundreds of
resistance genes, mobile genetic elements and phylogenetic markers• Applications
• Large-scale monitoring of various samples (manure, soil, water)• Efficacy of AMR mitigation strategies to affect spread of resistance
• Primers for 300 targets have been designed and initial trial runs have been completed
• 2016-2018- $1M USDA-NIFA grant – ISU (A. Howe & M. Soupir) USDA ARS (H. Allen & T. Moorman) Grinnell (S. Hinsa)
14
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
Highlight: DARTE-QMNational Program 108: Food Safety, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA
Research Focus: Ecology of AMREvaluating Trends in Resistance to
Antimicrobials and Biocides
• Nigeria, Egypt, Pakistan• Antimicrobial susceptibility of
E. coli, Salmonella and Staphylococcus• Isolates from eggs, poultry, cattle, swine and
clinical samples
International Collaborations: Under-Developed Countries
• Trends in poultry, dairy, swine, turkey and cattle
• At processing, on farm, at slaughter, at regional and watershed scale
• organic, range-fed, conventional
Antimicrobial Susceptibility
Resistance to Biocides
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
Dr. Charlene Jackson Dr. Jonathan Frye
• Objective 1: Determine and/or model patterns, purposes, and impacts of antibiotic use in food-producing animals.
• Objective 2: Monitor antibiotic drug susceptibilities of selected bacterial organisms in food-producing animals, production environments, and meat and poultry.
• Objective 3: Identify feasible management practices, alternatives to antibiotic use, and other mitigations to reduce AMR associated with food-producing animals and their production environments.
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
Research Highlights from USDA AMR Action Plan
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
Priority Animal Disease Vaccine and Therapeutic DevelopmentNational Program 103: Animal Health
• Streptococcus suis (Brockmeier et al. 2018)• Liamocins (Bischoff et al., 2015; Bischoff et al. 2018)
• Nanoparticle vaccines for Eimeria (Jenkins et al. 2018)
• Mastitis (Lippolis et al. 2017; Powell et al. 2018)
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
Environmental AMR Mitigation StrategiesNational Program 212: Soil and Air
• Development and implementation of woodchip bioreactors, reduce transport of tested antibiotic drugs 70-80% (Ames, IA) (Ilhan et al., 2012)
• Hydrothermal carbonization eliminates 100% of antibiotic resistant bacteria and their genes (Florence, SC) (Ducey et al. 2017).
• Composting of swine manure can effectively decrease the concentration of AR genes in swine manure (Bowling Green, KY)
• Assessing ARG removal performance for 7 full-scale anaerobic digesters treating dairy manure in Wisconsin (Marshfield, WI)
Grand Challenge
““The urgent progress needed today toaddress the most challenging problems requires leveraging capabilities across the scientific and technologicalenterprise in a convergent research approach.”
Recommendation 1: Transdisciplinary science and systems approaches should be prioritizedto solve agriculture’s most vexing problems.
ARS Grand Challenge
• What research questions should an ARS AMR Grand Challenge address?
• How can ARS research inform risk assessments, surveillance and antibiotic stewardship activities?
• How can ARS better work with academia and industry to address these challenges?
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
Thank You!
Roxann Brooks Motroni
National Program Leader for Animal Health: NP103
Kim Cook
National Program Leader for Food Safety: NP108
Cyril G. Gay
National Program Leader for Animal Health: NP103
Dave Knaebel
National Program Leader for Soil and Air: NP212
Characterizing “baseline” resistance in soils
Measuring antibiotic resistance in ungrazedprairie soils, Nebraska
Dr. Lisa Durso, Lincoln NE
United States Department of AgricultureAgricultural Research Service
Assessing and Managing Antibiotic Resistance, Nutrients, and Pathogens In Animal-Impacted Agroecosystems
National Program 212: Soil and Air, Agroecosystem Management Research, Lincoln, NE
• ARB and ARG are ubiquitous in all soils, so it is important to measure background/baselines levels when evaluating ag impacts.
• In cattle feedlots, Bacteroidetes and Clostridia are the bacteria most frequently carrying antibiotic resistance genes.
• Specific ARG classes are non-randomly distributed across taxa (some kinds of bacteria more likely than others to carry certain types of ARGs)
• The amount of resistance measured in any sample depends on the specific ARB/G target.
• Individual ARGs each have their own ecologies.
Impact of spatiotemporal, environmental, and wildlife factors on AMR and pathogens at watershed scale (34,000 acres)
Migratory waterfowl and other wildlife
Pest flies and mosquitoesAir, soil, water, feces
Chemicals, enzymes
Immune-derivedproducts
Phyto-chemicals
Microbial Products
Vaccines
BrockmeierVaccine
platforms in swine
Carroll Yeast to reduce
impacts of Bovine resp
disease & liver abscess in
cattle
Lillehoj CD molecules and cytokines
to control disease in
poultry
Swayne/AfonsoAvian influenza/
Newcastle vaccine for poultry
AndersonPhage to reduce
Salmonella in cattle
WelkerPre-biotic Chinese
tea additive for disease resist. &
growth in farmed fish.
LunneyCytokines to
improve swine health
DonoghuePlant products to
reduce Salmonella & Campy in
poultry AksoyChitosan to
control disease in fish
JenkinsCoccidiosis in
chicken
Anderson Sodium chlorate
to improve livestock food
safety
DunganCopper
footbaths in dairies