web service foundations: wsdl and soap marlon pierce community grids lab, indiana university...
Post on 28-Dec-2015
218 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Web Service Foundations: WSDL and SOAP
Marlon Pierce
Community Grids Lab, Indiana University
mpierce@cs.indiana.edu
What Are Web Services? Web services framework is an XML-based distributed services
system. SOAP, WSDL, UDDI WS-Interoperability Intended to support machine-to-machine interactions over the
network using messages. Basic ideas is to build a platform and programming language-
independent distributed invocation system out of existing Web standards. Most standards defined by W3C, OASIS (IP considerations) Interoperability really works, as long as you can map XML message
to a programming language type, structure, class, etc. We regularly use Java-C++ and Java-Perl communication
Very loosely defined, when compared to CORBA, etc. Inherit both good and bad of the web
Scalable, simple, distributed But no centralized management, not high performance, client
applications must be tolerant of failures.
Servlets/CGI Compared to Web Services
Browser
WebServer
HTTP GET/POST
DB
JDBC
WebServer
DB
JDBC
Browser
WebServer
SOAP
GUIClient
SOAPWSDL
WSDL
WSD
LWSD
L
Explanation of Previous Slide The diagram on the left represents a standard web
application. Browsers converse with web servers using HTTP
GET/POST methods. Servlets or CGI scripts process the parameters and take
action, like connect to a DB. On the right, we have a Web services system.
Separates visual from non-visual components Interactions may be either through the browser or
through a desktop client (Java Swing, Python, Windows, etc.)
Some Terminology The diagram on the left is called a client/server system. The diagram on the right is called a multi-tiered
architecture. SOAP: Simple Object Access Protocol
No longer an abbreviation in SOAP 1.2 XML Message format between client and service.
WSDL: Web Service Description Language. Describes how the service is to be used Compare (for example) to Java Interface. Guideline for constructing SOAP messages. WSDL is an XML language for writing Application
Programmer Interfaces (APIs).
More Examples of Web Services Geographical Information Systems are perfect candidates for WS
The Open Geospatial Consortium defines several relevant standards Geographic Markup Language (GML) exchanges info. Web Feature Service works with abstract GML feature data. Web Map Service creates maps (images) Lots more at http://www.opengeospatial.org/specs/?page=specs
XMethods Lots and lots of contributed examples, live demos Try them
http://www.xmethods.com/ Lots more for bioinformatics.
Easiest way to find is to download Taverna from SourceForge. Then check out http://communitygrids.blogspot.com for
guidelines. CICC is building many new one for chemical informatics.
RDAHMM: GPS Time Series SegmentationSlide Courtesy of Robert Granat, JPL
Complex data with subtle signals is difficult for humans to analyze, leading to gaps in analysis
HMM segmentation provides an automatic way to focus attention on the most interesting parts of the time
GPS displacement (3D) length two years.
Divided automaticallyby HMM into 7 classes.
Features:• Dip due to aquifer
drainage (days 120-250)
• Hector Mine earthquake (day 626)
• Noisy period at end of time series
Making RDAHMM into a Web Service RDAHMM takes GPS (or
other) time-series data as input, along with various command line parameters.
GPS data comes from GRWS or other services. http://geoapp.ucsd.edu/
scignDataPortal/grwsSummary.jsp
It creates 11 output files. Results are
superimposed on the input time series.
USAGE: GEMCodes/RDAHMM2/bin/rdahmm -data 'input observation sequence file'
[-L 'output model log likelihood file']
[-Q 'output optimal state sequence file']
[-pi 'output model initial state probability file']
[-A 'output model transition probability file']
[-B 'output model output distribution file']
[-minvalfile 'data minimum value file']
[-maxvalfile 'data maximum value file file']
[-rangefile 'data range file']
[-covarsweightsfile 'covariance component weightings file']
[-covgraphfile 'covariance graph connectivity file']
-T 'number of observations'
-D 'dimension of observations'
-N 'number of model states'
-output_type 'type of HMM output distribution {gauss}'
[-init_type 'type of HMM parameter initialization {random}']
.....
This is a portal client to a data mining service that I built. The web service analyzes GPS signal data to look for modes.
Portal courtesy of NASA REASoN project.
GPS data comes from the Scripps GRWS Web Service. Instead of defining a data type for this file, we just pass around URLs. The RDAHMM service receives the URL as input.
The service returns output result files as URLs.
The lesson: don’t go overboard with XML message definitions. You will regret it. Use URLs and keep your SOAP/WSDL simple.
How Do You Design the RDAHMM Service? First, you need an engine to run RDAHMM.
I develop Java services, so I have found Apache Ant very useful for wrapping binary executables, managing command-lines, and interacting with the Unix shell.
You can embed Ant in other Java programs. Second, you need an appropriate Web Service
container for your development environment. I use Apache Axis (examples will use version 1.4).
This runs in Apache Tomcat. .NET, C/C++, Python, Ruby, Perl, etc all have Web
Service containers. Ex: gSOAP for C/C++ from FSU, ZSI for Python
Writing the Service Writing a Web Service is easy
Just write a Java program In our case, the Java program must
Grab GPS data from GRWS service We pass this around using URLs.
Collect command line parameter values as input. Run the code. Send back a response as a Java Bean that
encapsulates URLs. Can either block or not-block, depending on how you want to
execute things.
This is a mixture of REST and XML-RPC styles.
Service Code Example public RDAHMMResultsBean runNonblockingRDAHMM2(String
siteCode,String resource, String contextGroup, String contextId, String minMaxLatLon, String beginDate, String endDate, numModelStates) throws
Exception {
try {
String dataUrl=querySOPACGetURL(siteCode, resource, contextGroup,
contextId, minMaxLatLon, beginDate, endDate);
return createRDAHMMBean( dataUrl,numModelStates);
}
catch (Exception ex) {...}
}
RDAHMMResultBean Codepublic class RDAHMMResultsBean
implements java.io.Serializable {
private java.lang.String AUrl;
private java.lang.String BUrl;
private java.lang.String LUrl;
private java.lang.String QUrl;
private java.lang.String inputUrl;
....
public RDAHMMResultsBean() {
}
//Plus all of the getters and setters
public java.lang.String getInputUrl() { return inputUrl; }
public void setInputUrl(java.lang.String inputUrl) { this.inputUrl = inputUrl; }
......
}
Nothing special about this code.
Note all the returned values are actually URLs.
AUrl, BUrl, LUrl, etc are all URLs to files generated by RDAHMM.
http://crisisgrid.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/crisisgrid/QuakeSim2/ExecutionServices/RDAHMMService/src/main/java/
Deploying an Axis 1 Service Now that you have written the code, you
follow these steps to make it into a service. Download Axis and install it into Tomcat.
That is, create a subdirectory of webapps and put all the Axis jars in WEB-INF/lib/.
Create a service descriptor file, service-config.wsdd and put this in WEB-INF/ Axis gives you tools to help.
Compile your code and put it in WEB-INF/classes or WEB-INF/lib (if jarred).
Creating an Axis Client Axis will inspect your newly deployed service and create a
WSDL file out of it. More on this in a minute.
WSDL is an XML API description. It tells clients how to invoke your service. Typically the service is invoked by sending a SOAP message, so
WSDL tells you how to construct SOAP. Clients typically discover and download the WSDL (UDDI,
wget, whatever). Axis has a tool called WSDL2Java that will convert the
WSDL into client stubs. Stubs give you local objects that invoke the remote service.
Clients can be anything JSP pages, Java Portlets, PHP clients, Swing or SWT GUIs, etc.
Some Notes on Axis 2 Axis 2 is a redesign of Axis 1 that has
Greater performance (using StAX XML parsers) Extensiblity to support Web Service Quality of Service
add-ons. Better support for Java-to-XML binding frameworks.
Allows you to send and receive more complicated XML messages. But I think you should avoid this.
See my notes: http://communitygrids.blogspot.com/2007/02/some-
notes-on-axis2-version-11.html
Some Additional Notes Typically, you don’t need to import any Axis
specific packages. Exception: finding and loading a property file.
If you are familiar with JSP, servlets, or similar things, you will notice that you also don’t Need to manage HTTP request, response, and
session variables. This style of programming is similar to the
Inversion of Control Pattern (IOC). Very useful when dealing with Java Beans.
What Have We Gained from This? We have decoupled the RDAHMM client and the
service. Now separated using well-defined interfaces. One service can be used by multiple, independently
developed clients. Services just do one thing really well. Application
“smarts” are in the client. Multiple services can be linked together into
composite applications. Workflow See for example Taverna
Google “Taverna SourceForge” to find it. Others: Kepler, XBaya (from IU)
Some General Advice Keep you services self-contained with simple interfaces.
Core problem in distributed systems is scalability. Services, like mash-ups, are intended to be put to unexpected
uses. Complication is the enemy. Services are NOT Distributed Objects
http://www.allthingsdistributed.com/historical/archives/000343.html Use XML Simple Types and URLs for input and output
rather than attachments. Collect your input/output into Java Beans, C structs, etc,
but don’t go overboard. Interoperability can suffer if your I/O types are too complicated.
Java<-->C, Axis 1<-->Axis2 JavaBeans/POJOs are used frequently in IOC systems like
Spring and Java Server Faces. Db4o is a really nice JavaBean database.
Web Service Extensions Web Services communicate with SOAP, and SOAP is
designed to be extensible. Examples of Extensions
Addressing: describes how SOAP messages can be conveyed across multiple hops.
Security: how to authenticate clients and servers, how to authorize usage, etc.
Reliability/ReliableMessaging: provides guaranteed delivery through acknowledgements
Most of these are defined by specifications published by OASIS. For more discussion, see
http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu/ptliupages/presentations/GGF15WebServices/
For a critique by Shrideep Pallickara, see http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu/ptliupages/presentations/GGF15WebServices/GGF-Slides.ppt
WSDL 1.1 Overview
Marlon Pierce Community Grids LabIndiana Universitympierce@cs.indiana.edu
What Is WSDL?
Web Service Description Language W3C specification See http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl for the official “note” for
WSDL 1.1. WSDL 1.1 never became a full “recommendation”. WSDL 2.0 working draft just completed it’s public call for
comments. This slide set will review WSDL 1.1, which is still the
“standard”. WSDL 2.0 should replace this soon.
Why Use WSDL? WSDL uses XML to describe interfaces
Programming language independent way to do this. So you can use (for example) C++ programs to remotely invoke Java
programs and vice versa. Consider Web browsers and Web servers:
All web browsers work pretty well with all web sites. You don’t care what kind of web server Amazon.com uses. Amazon doesn’t care if you use IE, Mozilla, Konqueror, Safari, etc. You all speak HTTP.
WSDL (and SOAP) are a generalization of this. Note I will describe WSDL from an Remote Procedure
Call/Remote Method Invocation point of view. But WSDL and SOAP also support more a more message-centric
point of view. C.f. Java Messaging System.
A Very Simple Example: Echopublic class echoService implements echoServiceInterface{
public String echo(String msg) {return msg;
}public static void main(String[] args) {
new echoService().echo(“hello”);}
}
The Echo Interface
/*** All implementers of this interface must* implement the echo() method.*/public interface echoServiceInterface {
public String echo(String toEcho);}
Now Use Echo As A Remote Service We can take the previous
Java program and deploy it in Tomcat as a service.
Clients can then invoke the echo service. WSDL tells them how to
do it. Clients don’t need to
know anything about the service implementation or even language.
WSDL is the latest IDL DCE and CORBA IDL
were two older examples.
C#Client
WSDL
Tomcat+Axis+Echo
WSDL
SOAP(Echo “hello”) “hello”
What Does echoServiceInterface Look Like In WSDL? <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<wsdl:definitions targetNamespace="http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu:8045/GCWS/services/Echo" xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:apachesoap="http://xml.apache.org/xml-soap" xmlns:impl="http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu:8045/GCWS/services/Echo" xmlns:intf="http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu:8045/GCWS/services/Echo" xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:wsdlsoap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<wsdl:types /> <wsdl:message name="echoResponse"> <wsdl:part name="echoReturn" type="xsd:string" /> </wsdl:message>
<wsdl:message name="echoRequest"> <wsdl:part name="in0" type="xsd:string" /> </wsdl:message><wsdl:portType name="Echo">
<wsdl:operation name="echo" parameterOrder="in0"> <wsdl:input message="impl:echoRequest" name="echoRequest" /> <wsdl:output message="impl:echoResponse" name="echoResponse" /> </wsdl:operation> </wsdl:portType> There’s more…
What Does This Look Like In WSDL, Continued?
<wsdl:binding name="EchoSoapBinding" type="impl:Echo"><wsdlsoap:binding style="rpc" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http" /> <wsdl:operation name="echo">
<wsdlsoap:operation soapAction="" /> <wsdl:input name="echoRequest">
<wsdlsoap:body encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" namespace="http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu:8045/GCWS/services/Echo"
use="encoded" /> </wsdl:input>
<wsdl:output name="echoResponse"> <wsdlsoap:body encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding
namespace="http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu:8045/GCWS/services/Echo" use="encoded" />
</wsdl:output> </wsdl:operation> </wsdl:binding><wsdl:service name="EchoService">
<wsdl:port binding="impl:EchoSoapBinding" name="Echo"> <wsdlsoap:address location="http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu:8045/GCWS/services/Echo" /> </wsdl:port> </wsdl:service></wsdl:definitions>
Don’t strain your eyes. We will break this down
Writing WSDL I’m sure you are impressed with the previous two
slides. One could write WSDL by hand, but this is not the
usual way. It was automatically generated by Apache Axis. Most
other Web service tools will do the same from your service code.
We will go through the construction, though, for understanding.
You should not think of WSDL (and SOAP) as programming languages. They are just assertions, or descriptions.
WSDL Parts Types
Used to define custom message types Messages
Abstraction of request and response messages that my client and service need to communicate.
PortTypes Contains a set of operations. Operations organize WSDL messages. Operation->method name, portType->java interface
Bindings Binds the portType to a specific protocol (typically SOAP over
http). You can bind one portType to several different protocols by using
more than one port. Services
Gives you one or more URLs for the service. Go here to execute “echo”.
Namespaces The WSDL document begins with several XML namespace
definitions.
Namespaces allow you to compose a single XML document from
several XML schemas.
Namespaces allow you to identify which schema an XML tag comes
from.
Avoids name conflicts.
See earlier XML lectures
As we will see, the Axis namespace generator went overboard.
Not all of these are used.
Front Matters: Namespace Definitions<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<wsdl:definitions targetNamespace="http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu:8045/GCWS/services/Echo" xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:apachesoap="http://xml.apache.org/xml-soap" xmlns:impl="http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu:8045/GCWS/services/Echo" xmlns:intf="http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu:8045/GCWS/services/Echo" xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:wsdlsoap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
…</wsdl:definitions>
What Does echoServiceInterface Look Like In WSDL?<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<wsdl:definitions …> <wsdl:types /> <wsdl:message name="echoResponse"> <wsdl:part name="echoReturn" type="xsd:string" /> </wsdl:message>
<wsdl:message name="echoRequest"> <wsdl:part name="in0" type="xsd:string" /> </wsdl:message>…</wsdl:definitions>
It’s empty...
WSDL Types
WSDL messages don’t need to declare types when just sending XML Schema primitive objects.
EchoService just has string messages. So no special types definitions are
needed in our WSDL. Strings are an XML schema built-in type.
When Would I Need A Custom Type? Any time your Web Service needs to send data formatted by anything other than XML Schema built-in types, you must define the type in WSDL.
Example: Arrays are not built-in types! Arrays of strings, ints, etc., must be defined in the WSDL
<type></type> structure. Another example: JavaBeans (or C structs or any
data classes with get/set methods) can be serialized to XML. Pass as messages to the remote endpoint. Support for this in implementations is variable.
AXIS has limited support because they use their own serializers.
Sun has better support but it won’t work with Axis.
How Does WSDL Encode String Arrays? Imagine that my echo service actually echoes
back an array of strings. Arrays are not part of the built-in types, so I
will have to define them myself. Luckily for us, SOAP defines arrays, so we
can import this definition. Next slide shows what this looks like.
String Array Example<wsdl:types>
<schema targetNamespace="http://.../GCWS/services/EchoArray"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <import namespace="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" /> <complexType name="ArrayOf_xsd_string">
<complexContent> <restriction base="soapenc:Array"> <attribute ref="soapenc:arrayType"
wsdl:arrayType="xsd:string[]" /> </restriction> </complexContent> </complexType> <element name="ArrayOf_xsd_string" nillable="true"
type="impl:ArrayOf_xsd_string" /> </schema> </wsdl:types>
Create a new data type, “ArrayOf_xsd_string” that is a restricted extension of the general SOAP array class.
WSDL String Array Types WSDL <type/> is nothing more than an extensibility
placeholder in WSDL. Technically, the WSDL schema specifies that
<type> </type> can contain a <sequence> of 0 or more <any> tags. Look at the WSDL schema.
And note that the <any/> tag acts like wildcard. You can insert any sort of xml here. This is a common XML/Web Service trick.
Type allows us to strongly type messages Compare: strong versus weak typing in
programming languages
Inserting a Type Between <type></type>, we insert a <schema>. Since arrays are defined in SOAP encoding rules, I next
import the appropriate schema. I import the definition of the SOAP Array and extend it
to a String array. Typically imports also have “location” attributes
“This namespace is located here for download.” Next, insert our own local definition of a type called
“ArrayOf_xsd_string”. This is a restricted extension of the SOAP Array complex
type. We only allow 1 dimensional string arrays It is also nillable—I am allowed to returna “null” value
for the string.
Handling Other XML Types You can also express other message arguments
as XML. Examples: a purchase order, an SVG description of an
image, a GML description of a map. In practice, these are handled by automatic
Bean serializers/deserializers. Castor is an example: http://www.castor.org/ XMLBeans is another http://xml.apache.org/xmlbeans/
These are tools that make it easy to convert between XML and JavaBeans.
By “JavaBeans” I mean objects that associate simple get/set methods with all data.
Implementation dependent.
WSDL Messages The “message” section specifies
communications that will go on between endpoints. Gives each message a name (to be
used later for reference). Specifies the type of message
Can be primitive types, like strings Can be defined types, as we saw
previously.
The echoServiceInterface messages
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> <wsdl:definitions> <wsdl:types /> <wsdl:message name="echoResponse"> <wsdl:part name="echoReturn" type="xsd:string" /> </wsdl:message><wsdl:message name="echoRequest"> <wsdl:part name="in0" type="xsd:string" /> </wsdl:message><wsdl:portType name="Echo">
<wsdl:operation name="echo" parameterOrder="in0"> <wsdl:input message="impl:echoRequest" name="echoRequest" /> <wsdl:output message="impl:echoResponse"
name="echoResponse" /> </wsdl:operation> </wsdl:portType>…</wsdl:definitions>
Our Echo Messages<wsdl:message name="echoResponse">
<wsdl:part name="echoReturn" type="xsd:string" />
</wsdl:message>
<wsdl:message name="echoRequest">
<wsdl:part name="in0" type="xsd:string" />
</wsdl:message>
Echo Service Messages Our echo service takes a string argument
and returns a string answer. In WSDL, I first abstract these as
messages. Echo needs two messages: request and
response Note we have not yet said message is the
request and which is the response. That is the job of the portType
operations, coming up.
Structure of a Message WSDL <message> elements have name attributes
and one or more parts. The message name should be unique for the
document. <operation> elements will refer to messages by
name. I need one <part> for each piece of data I need to
send in that message. Each <part> is given a name and specifies its type.
<part> types can point to <wsdl:type> definitions if necessary.
Our service just needs xsd:strings, so no problem.
WSDL portTypes WSDL messages are only abstract
messages. We bind them to operations within the portType.
The structure of the portType specifies (still abstractly) how the messages are to be used. Think of operations-->java methods and
portTypes-->java interfaces.
The echoServiceInterface portType<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<wsdl:definitions> <wsdl:types /> <wsdl:message name="echoResponse"> <wsdl:part name="echoReturn" type="xsd:string" /> </wsdl:message>
<wsdl:message name="echoRequest"> <wsdl:part name="in0" type="xsd:string" /> </wsdl:message><wsdl:portType name="Echo">
<wsdl:operation name="echo" parameterOrder="in0"> <wsdl:input message="impl:echoRequest"
name="echoRequest" /> <wsdl:output message="impl:echoResponse"
name="echoResponse" /> </wsdl:operation> </wsdl:portType>…</wsdl:definition>
EchoService portType<wsdl:portType name="Echo">
<wsdl:operation name="echo" parameterOrder="in0">
<wsdl:input message="impl:echoRequest"
name="echoRequest" />
<wsdl:output message="impl:echoResponse"
name="echoResponse" />
</wsdl:operation>
</wsdl:portType>
portType Message Patterns PortTypes support four types of messaging:
One way: Client send a message to the service and doesn’t want a response. <input> only.
Request-Response: Client sends a message and waits for a response. <input>, then <output>
Solicit-Response: Service sends a message to the client first, then the client responds. <output>, then <input>
Notification: <output> only. These still are abstract. We must implement them using some
message protocol. HTTP units of transmission are request and response, so mapping
Solicit-Response to HTTP will take some work.
portType for EchoService The echo service has one method, echo. It takes one string argument and returns one
string. In WSDL, the portType is “Echo”, the operation
is “echo”. The messages are organized into input and
output. Messages are placed here as appropriate. That is, <input> takes the <echoRequest>
message.
Parameter Order
This attribute of operation is used to specify zero or more space-separated values.
The values give the order that the input messages must be sent.
Echo is a bad example, since it only has one input parameter, named in0.
WSDL Self-Referencing
The WSDL <input> and <output> tags need to point back to the <message> definitions above:
<wsdl:message name="echoResponse"> <wsdl:part name="echoReturn" type="xsd:string" /> </wsdl:message>…<wsdl:portType name="Echo">
<wsdl:operation name="echo" parameterOrder="in0"> … <wsdl:output message="impl:echoResponse"
name="echoResponse" /> </wsdl:operation> </wsdl:portType>
The Picture So Far…
Part
Input Message
Part
Input Message
PartPart
Output Message
portType
Operation
Input
Ouput
hasInput
hasOutput
WSDL SOAP Bindings
In the previous slide, we specify several things: We will use SOAP/HTTP We will use RPC encoding style
Other choice is literal “document” style. We specify the namespace associated with
the Echo service input and output messages. All of this corresponds to SOAP message parts.
We will expand this in the next lecture.
Binding Section of WSDL<wsdl:definitions>… <wsdl:binding name="EchoSoapBinding" type="impl:Echo">
<wsdlsoap:binding style="rpc" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http" /> <wsdl:operation name="echo">
<wsdlsoap:operation soapAction="" /> <wsdl:input name="echoRequest">
<wsdlsoap:body encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
namespace="http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu:8045/GCWS/services/Echo" use="encoded" />
</wsdl:input><wsdl:output name="echoResponse">
<wsdlsoap:body encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding
namespace="http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu:8045/GCWS/services/Echo" use="encoded" />
</wsdl:output> </wsdl:operation> </wsdl:binding><wsdl:service name="EchoService">
<wsdl:port binding="impl:EchoSoapBinding" name="Echo"> <wsdlsoap:address location="http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu:8045/GCWS/services/Echo" /> </wsdl:port> </wsdl:service></wsdl:definitions>
Don’t strain your eyes--we will zoom in.
So Far…
We have defined abstract messages, which have XML values. Simple or custom-defined types.
We have grouped messages into operations and operations into portTypes.
We are now ready to bind the portTypes to specific protocols.
The Binding for Echo<wsdl:binding name="EchoSoapBinding" type="impl:Echo"> <wsdlsoap:binding style="rpc" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http" /> <wsdl:operation name="echo"> <wsdl:input name="echoRequest"> <wsdlsoap:body
encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" namespace=“[echo service namespace URI]" use="encoded" />
</wsdl:input> <wsdl:output name="echoResponse"> <wsdlsoap:body encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
namespace=“[echo service namespace URI]" use="encoded" />
</wsdl:output> </wsdl:operation></wsdl:binding> The highlighted “wsdlsoap:” tags are
extensions for SOAP message bindingand not part of the WSDL schema.
Binding tags Binding tags are meant to bind the parts of
portTypes to sections of specific protocols. SOAP, HTTP GET/POST, and MIME are provided in the
WSDL specification. Bindings refer back to portTypes by name, just as
operations point to messages. They are mirror images of the portTypes. Each part is extended by schema elements for a particular
binding protocol (i.e. SOAP). In our WSDL bindings, we will have two messages
(input and output). Each corresponds to SOAP body sections, described later. Additionally, we specify that the body should be encoded.
That is, RPC encoded. Alternatively, could also be “literal” (or “document”).
Structure of the Binding
<binding> tags are really just placeholders. They are meant to be extended at specific places by
wsdl protocol bindings. These protocol binding rules are defined in supplemental
schemas. The following box figure summarizes these things
Green boxes are part of WSDL From the wsdl namespace, that is.
Red boxes are parts of the document from other schemas From wsdlsoap namespace in the echo example.
Binding Structure
binding
Non-wsdl extension
operation
Non-wsdl extension
input output
Non-wsdl extension
Non-wsdl extension
A little more on encoding...
We specify SOAP encoding SOAP is a message format and needs a transport
protocol, so we specify HTTP. Operation styles may be either “RPC” or “Document”.
We use RPC. SOAP Body elements will be used to actually convey
message payloads. RPC requires “encoded” payloads.
Each value (echo strings) is wrapped in an element named after the operation.
Useful RPC processing on the server side. Documents are literal (unencoded)
Use to just send a payload of XML inside SOAP.
Binding Associations to SOAP
Binding SOAP RPC
Operation
WSDL SOAP
SOAP Action
Input
Output
SOAP Body
SOAP Body
Binding Restrictions
Binding elements point by name to portTypes.
WSDL allows more than one binding element to point to the same port type. Why? Because a service may support multiple,
alternative protocol bindings.
What Does It Mean? WSDL is not a programming language. A service that exposes an WSDL interface is just
telling a client what it needs to do to communicate with the service. Send me strings and I will return strings. I expect SOAP messages that include the strings in
the body. I expect this body to be RPC encoded with the
operation name so that I will know which operation the body contents belong to.
I will return SOAP messages that include Strings in the body.
These will also be encoded so that you know what to do with them.
What Does This Look Like In WSDL?
<wsdl:definitions>…
<wsdl:binding>…
</wsdl:binding><wsdl:service name="EchoService">
<wsdl:port binding="impl:EchoSoapBinding" name="Echo">
<wsdlsoap:address location="http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu:8045/GCWS/services/Echo" />
</wsdl:port> </wsdl:service></wsdl:definitions>
Ports and Services
<wsdl:service name="EchoService">
<wsdl:port binding="impl:EchoSoapBinding" name="Echo"> <wsdlsoap:address
location=“http://..../"/>
</wsdl:port>
</wsdl:service>
Port and Service Tags
The service element is a collection of ports. That’s all it is for.
Ports are intended to point to actual Web service locations The location depends on the binding. For SOAP bindings, this is a URL.
Ports and Services
A service can have more than one port. Two ports can point back to the same binding
element. Ports refer to bindings by name This allows you to provide alternative service
locations. The figure on next slide conceptually depicts
associating two ports to a single binding. The ports differ only in the URLs of their services.
Summary of WSDL WSDL decouples remote service operations.
Types=custom message definitions. Any data types not in the XML schema.
Message=name the messages that must be exchanged and their data types, possibly defined by <type>.
PortTypes=service interfaces Operations=remote method signatures.
Bindings=mappings of portType operations to real message formats
Ports=locations (URLs) of real services.
SOAP Intro and Message Formats
Marlon PierceCommunity Grids LabIndiana Universitympierce@cs.indiana.edu
SOAP Primary References
SOAP is defined by a number of links http://www.w3.org/TR/soap/
See primarily the “Primer” and “Messaging Framework” links.
The actual SOAP schema is available from http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope/ It is pretty small, as these things go.
SOAP and Web Services
Our previous lectures have looked at WSDL Defines the interfaces for
remote services. Provides guidelines for
constructing clients to the service.
Tells the client how to communicate with the service.
The actual communications are encoded with SOAP. Transported by HTTP
Client
Service
WSDL
WSDL
SOAPRequest
SOAPResponse
Beyond Client-Server SOAP assumes messages
have an originator, one or more ultimate receivers, and zero or more intermediaries.
The reason is to support distributed message processing.
Implementing this message routing is out of scope for SOAP. Assume each node is a
Tomcat server or JMS broker.
That is, we can go beyond client-server messaging.
Originator Recipient
Intermediary
Intermediary
Intermediary
SOAP in One Slide SOAP is just a message format.
Must transport with HTTP, TCP, etc. SOAP is independent of but can be connected
to WSDL. SOAP provides rules for processing the
message as it passes through multiple steps. SOAP payloads
SOAP carries arbitrary XML payloads as a body. SOAP headers contain any additional information These are encoded using optional conventions
Defining SOAP Messages
Given what you have learned about WSDL, imagine it is your job to design the message interchange layer. What are the requirements?
Note SOAP actually predates WSDL, so this is in reverse order.
Web Service Messaging Infrastructure Requirements?
Define a message format Define a messaging XML schema Allow the message to contain arbitrary XML from other schemas.
Keep It Simple and Extensible Messages may require advanced features like security, reliability, conversational
state, etc. KISS, so don’t design these but do design a place where this sort of advanced
information can go. Add these capabilities in further specifications: WS-Security, WS-ReliableMessaging, etc.
Tell the message originator is something goes wrong. Define data encodings
That is, you need to tell the message recipient the types of each piece of data. Define some RPC conventions that match WSDL
Your service will need to process the message, so you need to provide some simple conventions for matching the message content to the WSDL service.
Decide how to transport the message. Generalize it, since messages may pass through many entities.
Decide what to do about non-XML payloads (movies, images, arbitrary documents).
SOAP Basics
SOAP is often thought of as a protocol extension for doing Remote Procedure Calls (RPC) over HTTP. This is how it is often used.
This is not accurate: SOAP is an XML message format for exchanging structured, typed data. It may be used for RPC in client-server applications May be used to send XML documents Also suitable for messaging systems (like JMS) that
follow one-to-many (or publish-subscribe) models. SOAP is not a transport protocol. You must attach
your message to a transport mechanism like HTTP.
What Does SOAP Look Like? The next two slides shows examples of SOAP
message from our Echo service. It’s just XML
First slide is an example message that might be sent from a client to the echo service.
Second slide is an example response. I have highlighted the actual message payload.
<?xml version=‘1.0’ ?><soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> <soapenv:Body> <ns1:echo soapenv:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:ns1="http://.../axis/services/EchoService">
<in0 xsi:type="xsd:string">Hollow World</in0> </ns1:echo> </soapenv:Body></soapenv:Envelope>
SOAP Request
<?xml version=‘1.0’ ?><soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/ xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> <soapenv:Body> <ns1:echoResponse soapenv:encodingStyle=http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/ xmlns:ns1="http://../axis/services/echoService">
<echoReturn xsi:type=“String“>Hollow World
</echoReturn> </ns1:echoResponse> </soapenv:Body></soapenv:Envelope>
SOAP Response
SOAP Structure SOAP structure is very
simple. 0 or 1 header elements 1 body element Envelop that wraps it all.
Body contains XML payload.
Headers are structured the same way. Can contain additional
payloads of “metadata” Security information,
quality of service, etc.
Envelope
Body
MessagePayload
Header
SOAP Schema Notes All of this is expressed formally
in the SOAP schema. Which in turn derives from the
SOAP Infoset XML on the right is taken
directly from the SOAP schema.
This just encodes the previously stated rules.
Also, note that the SOAP envelope can contain other attributes. <anyAttribute> tag is the
wildcard
<xs:complexType name="Envelope">
<xs:sequence> <xs:element
ref="tns:Header" minOccurs="0" />
<xs:element ref="tns:Body" minOccurs="1" />
</xs:sequence> <xs:anyAttribute
namespace="##other" processContents="lax" />
</xs:complexType>
SOAP Envelop The envelop is the root container of the SOAP
message. Things to put in the envelop:
Namespaces you will need. http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope is required, so
that the recipient knows it has gotten a SOAP message. Others as necessary
Encoding rules (optional) Specific rules for deserializing the encoded SOAP data. More later on this.
Header and body elements. Headers are optional, body is mandatory. Headers come first in the message, but we will look at
the body first.
Options on <xsd:any/> The <xsd:any/> element takes the usual optional
maxOccurs, minOccurs attributes. Allows a namespace attribute taking one of the values:
##any (the default), ##other (any namespace except the target
namespace), List of namespace names, optionally including either
##targetNamespace or ##local. Controls what elements the wildcard matches, according to
namespace. It also allows a processContents attribute taking one of the
values strict, skip, lax (default strict), controlling the extent to which the contents of the matched element are validated. SOAP is lax.
Lax
“If the item, or any items among its children if it's an element information item, has a uniquely determined declaration available, it must be ·valid· with respect to that definition.”
That is, ·validate· message payloads when you can, don't worry when you can't.
SOAP Headers
SOAP Body elements contain the primary message contents. Headers are really just extension points where you can
include elements from other namespaces. i.e., headers can contain arbitrary XML.
Headers may be processed independently of the body. Headers may optionally define encodingStyle. Headers may optionally have a “role” attribute Header entries may optionally have a “mustUnderstand”
attribute. mustUnderstand=1 means the message recipient must
process the header element. If mustUnderstand=0 or is missing, the header element is
optional. Headers may also have a “relay” attribute.
Header Definition From SOAP Schema
<xs:element name="Header" type="tns:Header" /> <xs:complexType name="Header">
<xs:annotation> <xs:documentation>Elements replacing the wildcard MUST be
namespace qualified, but can be in the targetNamespace</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation><xs:sequence>
<xs:any namespace="##any" processContents="lax" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
</xs:sequence> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other" processContents="lax" /> </xs:complexType>
Example Uses of Headers
Security: WS-Security and SAML place additional security information (like digital signatures and public keys) in the header.
Quality of Service: SOAP headers can be used if we want to negotiate particular qualities of service such as reliable message delivery and transactions.
Session State Support: Many services require several steps and so will require maintenance of session state. Equivalent to cookies in HTTP. Put session identifier in the header.
Example Header from SOAP Primer<?xml version='1.0' ?> <env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-
envelope"> <env:Header> <m:reservation xmlns:m=“http://my.example.com/"
env:role="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope/role/next" env:mustUnderstand="true">
<m:reference>uuid:093a2da1-q345-739r-ba5d-pqff98fe8j7d </m:reference>
<m:dateAndTime>2001-11-29T13:20:00.000-05:00 </m:dateAndTime>
</m:reservation> <n:passenger xmlns:n=“…"
env:role="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope/role/next" env:mustUnderstand="true">
<n:name>Åke Jógvan Øyvind</n:name> </n:passenger> </env:Header>
Explanation of Header Example In general, we can import tags into the header from name
spaces outside of soap. <reservation/>, <reference/>, <dataAndTime/>,<passenger/>
SOAP doesn’t need to worry to much about these. It is the node’s job to process these things.
In this particular case, we may imagine an ongoing transaction for making an airline reservation. Involves several steps and messages, so client must remind
the server of this state information when sending a message. The actual header content all comes from other
namespaces. The role and mustUnderstand attributes are from SOAP.
Header Processing
SOAP messages are allowed to pass through many intermediaries before reaching their destination. Intermediary=some unspecified routing application. Imagine SOAP messages being passed through many
distinct nodes. The final destination processes the body of the
message. Headers are allowed to be processed independently of
the body. May be processed by intermediaries.
This allows an intermediary application to determine if it can process the body, provide the required security, session, or reliability requirements, etc.
Roles, Understanding, and Relays
Role?must
Understand
Relay?ForwardHeader
No
Yes ProcessHeader
Yes
No
Yes No RemoveHeader
Header Roles SOAP nodes may be assigned role designations. SOAP headers then specify which role or roles
should process. Standard SOAP roles:
None: SOAP nodes MUST NOT act in this role. Next: Each SOAP intermediary and the ultimate SOAP
receiver MUST act in this role. UltimateReceiver: The ultimate receiver MUST act in
this role. In our example, all nodes must process the
header entries.
SOAP Body Body entries are really just placeholders for XML
from some other namespace. The body contains the XML message that you
are transmitting. It may also define encodingStyle, just as the
envelop. The message format is not specified by SOAP.
The <Body></Body> tag pairs are just a way to notify the recipient that the actual XML message is contained therein.
The recipient decides what to do with the message.
SOAP Body Element Definition<xs:element name="Body" type="tns:Body" /> <xs:complexType name="Body">
<xs:sequence> <xs:any namespace="##any"
processContents="lax" minOccurs="0“ maxOccurs="unbounded" />
</xs:sequence> <xs:anyAttribute namespace="##other"
processContents="lax" /> </xs:complexType>
SOAP Body Example
<soapenv:Body> <ns1:echo soapenv:encodingStyle=
"http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
xmlns:ns1="http://.../axis/services/EchoService">
<in0 xsi:type="xsd:string">HollowWorld</in0>
</ns1:echo></soapenv:Body.
Example SOAP Body Details The <Body> tag is extended to include elements
defined in our Echo Service WSDL schema. This particular style is called RPC.
Maps WSDL bindings to SOAP body elements. Guidelines will be given in next lecture.
xsi-type is used to specify that the <in0> element takes a string value. This is data encoding Data encoding rules will also be examined in next lectures.
Representational State Transfer (REST) The term REST was proposed by Roy Fielding
Dissertation is available from http://roy.gbiv.com/pubs/dissertation/top.htm
Fielding is the first author of the HTTP 1.1 Spec, IETF RFC 2616) The primary concept of REST is statelessness (or
idempotence). All invocations of the same method should give identical
responses. Note REST does not have to transfer HTML
One could build other client server applications on top of this. Famous example: WebDAV (actually predates Fielding’s
dissertation). Modern examples: Atom and RSS feeds emit XML data that can
be easily parsed and used in applications. Commonly used in mash-ups. See Yahoo’s Pipes examples. That is, RSS and Atom XML don’t have to be immediately
rendered for presentations.
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>'<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19457310</id><updated>2007-03-30T14:10:58.184-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Marlon Pierce's Community Grids Lab Blog</title><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://communitygrids.blogspot.com/index.html'></link><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://communitygrids.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?start-index=26&max-results=25'></link><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://communitygrids.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'></link><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://communitygrids.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'></link><author><name>Marlon Pierce</name></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www2.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>76</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19457310.post-4399342799160789059</id><published>2007-03-29T18:24:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2007-03-30T14:10:58.271-07:00</updated><title type='text'>db4o Java Bean Database</title><content type='html'>The db4o <a href="http://www.db4o.com/">http://www.db4o.com/</a> project makes a very simple, light-weight object database. It's free, too. Maybe too free, as they use GPL. But see comment below. Obviously this sort of thing is great if you do a lot of POJO development (say, with JSF) and need some persistent storage.<br /><br />The downloadable documentation is pretty good, as is this article:
Atom and RSS Services? Sure, why not? You can convey a lot of information
in a news feed. Good for sequential science data
Seismic events Recently docked drug-like molecules in on-going
simulations. Also it is easy to build HTTP GET query interfaces. Useful for conveying metadata about projects
http://www.chembiogrid.org/wsrss/wsdlrss/getFeed lists available Web services, which are frequently updated.
Useful tools: Atomsphere Java libraries SimplePie RSS libraries for PHP
REST Vs. SOAP? Actually, I think it is really REST versus WSDL. REST applies the same API to all applications:
PUT, GET, POST, DELETE These operations are applied to URLs The actual URLs can point to XML files.
XML could be SOAP, ATOM, RSS, ... Clients and services may do additional processing of
the transmitted XML that is not in the API’s scope. WSDL and XML-RPC define custom APIs
specific to the application.
Realistic REST From my experience, REST’s stateless
philosophy is generally a good idea, even if you design and build SOAP+WSDL Web Services.
Some useful principals: Make each service completely self-contained. The
WSDL should define everything you need to invoke the service.
Use URLs as return values. This is especially useful for scientific services that use input and output files. It’s much easier and more maintainable to use URLs to
transfer files that your service needs or generates. Don’t use stateful communication protocols. Park
state information in a URL or in a WS-Context service.
This is a portal client to a data mining service that I built. The web service analyzes GPS signal data to look for modes.
Portal courtesy of NASA REASoN project.
GPS data comes from the Scripps GRWS Web Service. Instead of defining a data type for this file, we just pass around URLs. The RDAHMM service receives the URL as input.
The service returns output result files as URLs.
The lesson: don’t go overboard with XML message definitions. You will regret it. Use URLs and keep your SOAP/WSDL simple.
Apache S3 REST
Amazon’s Simple Storage Service (S3) provides a simple for-fee online storage service.
Files are uploaded and downloaded using HTTP PUT and GET operations.
Shared symmetric session keys are used to generate unique, un-guessable URLs for files that can be reproduced by the client without having to contact the service.
It is all amazingly simple. See docs at
http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonS3/ See my notes at
http://communitygrids.blogspot.com/2007/02/notes-on-amazon-s3-file-services.html
top related