two economics, different remedies professor: cheng-nan chen

Post on 26-Dec-2015

222 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

TWO ECONOMICS, TWO ECONOMICS, DIFFERENT REMEDIESDIFFERENT REMEDIES

Professor: Cheng-Nan Chen

GROUP’S MEMBERS

.

Mamunur Rahsid

Nguyen Tan Nhat Duy

Do Nguyen Yen Nhi

Huynh Tan Tai

Betty ViVi

CONTENT

The America

Deflation in US Today

World financial crisis

Solution

Introduction – China

Brief history of SOEs

China’s Stimulate Plan

The AMERICA is the third or fourth largest country by total area, . It is one of the world's most ethnically diverse and multicultural nations, the product of large-scale immigration from many countries.The U.S. economy is the world's largest national economy, with an estimated 2009 GDP of $14.3 trillion (a quarter of nominal global GDP and a fifth of global GDP at purchasing power parity.The United States is the largest importer of goods and third largest exporter, in the world. .

THE UNITED STATE

Productivity has surged, thereby contributing to the lack of hiring since 2001

Unemployment dropped slightly to 6.1 percent in September 2003, and 57,000 jobs were created for the first gain in eight months. However, more than one million jobs have disappeared since November 2001 .

DEFLATION IN THE US TODAY

Some assets (particularly housing) appear overpriced. The U.S. trade deficit continues to grow, hitting $41.8 billion in May 2003. World production may be outpacing demand, particularly in some sectors such as capital goods and consumer durable goods.

DEFLATION IN THE US TODAY

FINANCIAL CRISIS OF 2007- 2009

The financial crisis of 2007 to the present is a crisis triggered by a liquidity shortfall in the United States banking system. It has resulted in the collapse of large financial institutions, the bailout of banks by national governments, and downturns in stock markets around the world.

THE GROWTH OF THE HOUSING BUBBLE

Between 1997 and 2006, the price of the typical American house increased by 124%.

By September 2008, average U.S. housing prices had declined by over 20% from their mid-2006 peak

When prices declined, Banks couldn’t refinancing and customers couldn’t pay loans. During 2007, Banks began foreclosure proceedings on nearly 1.3 million properties.This increased to 2.3 million in 2008.

SUB-PRIME LENDING

These United States banks believed that the risks of subprime loans could be managed, a belief that was fed by constantly rising home prices. However, the gradual decline of home prices in 2006 led to the possibility of real losses. As home values declined, many borrowers realized that the value of their home was exceeded by the amount they owed on their mortgage.These borrowers began to default on their loans, which drove home prices down further and ruined the value of mortgage-backed securities This downward cycle created a mortgage market meltdown

FINANCIAL MARKET IMPACT

Initially the companies affected were those directly involved in home construction and mortgage lending such as Northern Rock and Countrywide Financial, as they could no longer obtain financing through the credit markets. Over 100 mortgage lenders went bankrupt during 2007 and 2008

The financial institution crisis hit its peak in September and October 2008. Several major institutions either failed, were acquired under duress, or were subject to government takeover. These included Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Washington Mutual, Wachovia, and AIG

FINANCIAL MARKET IMPACT

Japan’s years of pain were made worse by deflation, an affliction that assailed the United States during the Great Depression. While falling prices can be good news for people in need of cars, housing and other wares, a sustained, broad drop discourages businesses from investing and hiring.

FINANCIAL MARKET IMPACT

Germany has done relatively well in the current downturn without large stimulus spending, and that experience is now cited by adherents of austerity. Germans had two advantages over Americans: A more extensive social safety net to give consumers more money, and a vibrant manufacturing base to churn out more goods for export

FINANCIAL MARKET IMPACT

FED’S SOLUTION

The Primary way to attack deflation is to inject credit into the economy, giving reluctant consumers the ability to spend

Fed traditionally adjusts a benchmark overnight rate for banks that influences rates on car loans, mortgages and other forms of credit

Governments have increased spending or cut taxes to offset declines in consumer spending and business investment.

The Fed also relieved American banks of troubled investments, many linked to mortgages, to give the banks room to make new loans.

New or reinstated rules designed help stabilize the financial system over the long-run to mitigate or prevent future crises

FED’S SOLUTION

The Fed pulled this lever long ago, and has kept its target rate from 6.5% to 1.0% to combat the perceived risk of deflation.The Fed then raised the Fed funds rate significantly between July 2004 and July 2006. This contributed to an increase in 1-year and 5-year adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) rates, making ARM interest rate resets more expensive for homeowners.

FED’S SOLUTION

INTRODUCTION-CHINA

INTRODUCTION

Since 1979, China has reformed and opened its economy. The Chinese leadership has adopted a more pragmatic perspective on many political and socioeconomic problems, and has reduced the role of ideology in economic policy. China's has been the largest reduction of poverty and one of the fastest increases in income levels ever seen. China today is the fourth-largest economy in the world. It has sustained average economic growth of over 9.5% for the past 26 years.

Chinese legislators unveiled several proposed amendments to the state constitution. Proposal to provide protection for private property rights. Rebalance income distribution between urban and rural regions, and to maintain economic growth while protecting the environment and improving social equity.

INTRODUCTION

INDUSTRY

Industry and construction account for about 46% of China's GDP. Major industries are mining and ore processing, iron, steel, and so on.Consumer products including footwear, toys, and automobiles.Other transportation equipment including rail cars and ships, aircraft, and telecommunications.

CHINA’S ECONOMY

Figure: Chinese Exports of Goods and Services as a Percent of GDP: 1985-2008

THE DEVELOPMENT STAGES OF ECONOMY

First stage (1952~1976): Planning economy Second stages:

First period(1977-1980): 1978- implemented reformed and opened policy Second period(1981-1990):Third period(1991-1993): 1993-GDP grew highest in the historyFourth period(1994-2001): 1998- Asia

Financial Crisis

The development stages of economy

Fifth period(2001-now):

2007-China overtook the United States to become the world’s second largest merchandise exporter after the European Union (EU).2009- a huge expansion of the government role in the corporate sector. Economic expansion from iron, steel, motor vehicle, and tourism.

BRIEF HISTORY OF SOEs

Before the economic reforms in the 1980s, businesses in China were operated and strictly controlled by governmental agencies.The government and its agencies retained all investment and operating decisions. The managers of these SOEs had little incentive and managerial authority to enhance its efficiency.SOE was not regarded as a mere commercial organization. It was also considered as a quasi-government agent that was required to pursue the broad social, political and economic objectives of the government

BRIEF OF SOEs

It has been generally agreed that the government's direct control and management of SOEs, together with other factors such as an over-centralized national economy, result in poor performance of SOEs In the early 1980s, the government began reforming the SOEs. The objective of the SOE's reform was to rejuvenate the SOEs by giving more and more autonomy in making economic decisions and providing financial incentives to managers and employees of SOEs.

Two major reforms have been adopted for SOEs. They are the contract responsibility system (CRS) and corporatization.

BRIEF OF SOEs

CRS

The government retains the ownership The SOE is subcontracted to selected individuals (managers) to independently run the firm The managers are rewarded if the operating targets set in the contract are achieved. The financial incentives for managers include sharing of the profits in excess of the targeted amount.

FEATURES OF SOEs AFTER RESTRUCTURING

There is increasing degree of separation of management and ownership... The decision power now is in the hands of the SOE's managers or the board of directors.Except for large and key SOEs, operations of most SOEs are no longer subject to state plans. 3. SOEs are now operating in freer market and are subject to market forces. The government no longer guarantees a market for an SOE's products and has stopped subsidizing losses incurred in SOEs.

FEATURES OF SOEs AFTER RESTRUCTURING

The reward of the manager is often directly linked to the performance of the SOE.

Accounting information is widely used to measure performance.

There is no market for stocks issued by most SOEs.. the value of the firm cannot be determined in a free market. Merger and acquisition of SOEs is not a common practice as there are political restrictions as well as technical problems

NEW PROBLEMS HAVE EMERGED

The agency problem is more serious among the SOEs' managers as the incentive system is short-term oriented. Their primary financial reward system is linked the profit performance. As these managers are not allowed to own shares in the SOEs they managed, there is no long-term incentive.

NEW PROBLEMS HAVE EMERGED

As a result, relying on these misleading or false financial information may lead to serious consequences, such as the loss of state funds, the wrong assessment of managers, and the formulation of incorrect economic decisions and policies.

Stimulus Package588 billion USD

Transportation

Rural infrastructure

Housing

Disaster rebuilding

Tax cuts

Finance

Health and education

Environment

Industry

CHINESE ECONOMIC STIMULUS PLAN

1500

1000

370 370

210150

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Yuan

PublicInfrastructureDevelopment

ReconstructionWork

RuralDevelopment

TechnologyAdvancement

Program

PromotingEnergy saving

Education, Culture

Distribution of The Stimulate Fund

RESULT OF THE STIMULATE PACKAGE

The stimulus provided funds for infrastructure projects and housing developments. Some were used to assist local governments to lend money to state-owned companies to develop housing estates, roads and bridges. This will drive employment in areas of manufacturing, steel, cement and other sectors of the economy.

RESULT OF THE STIMULATE PACKAGE

Some expert says the vast bulk of stimulate package went to state-owned companies

And they used the money to strengthen their dominance in their markets or to enter new ones

RESULT OF THE STIMULATE PACKAGE

China's economic growth was sustained by the economic stimulus and in addition, assisted neighboring countries with the economic recovery in 2010

Chinese economic growth was around 10 percent even as its European and north American economies were slowing.

THE END

Thanks for your listening!

top related