topic 6-1. (ch. 8) compensating wage differentials

Post on 17-Jan-2018

229 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Compensating wage differential Reduction in pay in return for an attractive job characteristics. Otherwise, jobs would be flooded with applicants. Estimation: W = F(x) + b*P P: probability of injury, death, noise, stress, heat/cold, physical strength, lack of freedom, all disamenities Risk and hazard on the job 1975 79 82 88 93 Fatalities per 100,000 9.4 8.6 7.4 5.0 5.2 Incidence per 100 3.3 4.3 3.5 4.0 3.8

TRANSCRIPT

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 1

Topic 6-1. (Ch. 8)

Compensating Wage Differentials

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 2

Compensating wage differential

Reduction in pay in return for an attractive job characteristics. Otherwise, jobs would be flooded with applicants.

Estimation: W = F(x) + b*PP: probability of injury, death, noise, stress, heat/cold, physical strength, lack of freedom, all disamenities

Risk and hazard on the job

1975 79 82 88 93Fatalities per 100,000

9.4 8.6 7.4 5.0 5.2

Incidence per 100

3.3 4.3 3.5 4.0 3.8

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 3

Figure 8.1: A Family of Indifference Curves between Wages and Risk of Injury

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 4

Figure 8.2: Representative Indifference Curves for Two Workers Who Differ in

Their Aversion to Risk of Injury

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 5

Figure 8.3: A Family of Isoprofit Curves for an Employer

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 6

Figure 8.4: The Zero-Profit Curves of Two Firms

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 7

Figure 8.5: Matching Employers and Employees

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 8

Figure 8.6: An Offer Curve

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 9

Figure 8.7: The Effects of Government Regulation in a Perfectly Functioning

Labor Market

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 10

Figure 8.8: A Worker Accepting Unknown Risk

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 11

Evidences

Role of taste: some are challenging.Workers usually overestimate the probability

of rare workplace deathi) compensating differentials will be larger than would be required

ii) most informed workers will be found in the most dangerous job

Probability of being found and certainty of being penalized has an effect on improvement

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 12

Other Amenities

Location amenities: quality of life matters(Sunshine, temperature, culture)

Government wage differentials: non-profit sector. Risks? Compensating wage differentials?-Long queues of workers

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 13

Figure 8.9: An Indifference Curve between Wages and Employee Benefits

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 14

Figure 8.10: An Isoprofit Curve Showing the Wage/Benefit Offers a Firm Might Be Willing

to Make to Its Employees: A Unitary Trade-Off

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 15

Fixed amount of Fringe Benefit

Individuals may not choose between fringe benefits and wage (fixed fringe benefit)

Reasons of fixed fringe benefits i) Cost of benefit might be cheaper (economies

of scale) ii) Prohibit adverse selection and encourage long-

term attachment iii) In many cases, fringe benefits are tax

deductible Cafeteria –benefit plans: allow workers to choose

point on budget line provided by employers

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 16

Figure 8.11: Alternative Isoprofit Curves Showing the Wage/Benefit Offers a Firm Might

Be Willing to Make to Its Employees: Nonunitary Trade-Offs

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 17

Figure 8.12: Market Determination of the Mix of Wages and Benefits

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 8- 18

Figure 8A.2: The Choice between H’ Hours with Certainty and H’ Hours on Average

top related