the dutch case july, 7, 2015 dr. alice schippers disability studies, medical humanities, vu...
Post on 02-Jan-2016
219 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
The Dutch Case
July, 7, 2015Dr. Alice Schippers Disability Studies, Medical Humanities, VU university, Amsterdam
Article 12 of the UNCRPD
Els’ Story
Els Jansen (not her real name): woman of nearly 50Self advocate, employed at a national DPOAbove all: in love!
Legal guardianship since the age of 18, because of ‘several labels’Her partner bought a double bedSupport staff informed her mentor, without informing ElsMentor doesn’t give permission to marryEls is suing her guardianship in court
Els is ready to ‘fight for her rights’
Timeline Ratification & Implementation UNCRPD
2006 UN CRPD• 2007 Netherlands signed• 2007- 2011 ‘little happened’ (Pillay, 2012)• 2010-onwards pressure by DPO’s: Coalition for Inclusion• 2012-2013 impact research on legal and financial
consequences • 2014 – proposal for ratification prepared by
Government, sent to parliament • 2015 – jan-aug: consultation rounds by parliament• 2015 – autumn: ratification expected
Dutch context/1: some issues -> Some laws conflict with the Convention’s Art
12
Historical context• Less rights based discourse• Less prescriptive legislation (laws follow practice, instrumental)• Solidarity: ‘polder model’ (group based, rather than individual)• charities and local communities were responsable:
tend to patriarchal attitudes and disabling practices
Dutch context/2: some issues
Modernisation and professionalisation-> terms and practices like Person-Centred Planning and
individual education:
lip service
-> central government
‘don’t interfere with the local community’
-> 2015: ‘Participation society’: new wine in old bottles?• massive changes in care and education: • decisions and provisions moved to local community, and budgets have
been cut
Impact on UNCRPD Implementation
-> PWD: receiving support from family members, neighbours, volunteers – • can be good, • but can also mean inexpert, patriarchal, infantalising or
even abusive treatment
-> Return to old models, before modernisation/professionalization – • PWD ‘deserving’ and ‘thankful’ to basic services, • expected to fit in with community norms rather than being
included as they are
Els’ story
Illustrates conflict of the current Dutch situation with the Convention’s Art. 12 • ‘best interest’: of whom?• shared decisionmaking• importance of contexts (historical, political, social)• right to take risks and make mistakes• QOL- outcomes? ‘Fight for her rights’ – self esteem
Real change?
top related