teacher and administrator evaluation update before the board of education by ms. christine...
Post on 25-Dec-2015
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Teacher and Administrator Evaluation Update
Before The Board of Education
By Ms. Christine Sipperley, Mr. Brian Whiston, and Dr. Glenn
Maleyko.February 24, 2014
Important Changes2005 Dearborn brought in a researched based
model and abandoned the checklist evaluation system
2010 State Law Changed requiring all teachers to receive evaluations
2011 Major Changes to the State Law on Evaluations. Student Growth Data included for teachers and administrators. Went to a four category scale:
Highly Effective, Effective, Minimally Effective, and Ineffective.
Teacher Evaluation Committee
Bill Tucker Mark Palise Jill Chochol Shannon
Peterson Andrew Denison Linda Salamey Fatme Faraj Robert Seeterlin Hassane Jaafar Gail Shenkman Julia Maconochie Chris Sipperley Wyatt David Steve Salah Glenn Maleyko Nicole Chubb
A High Level of Collaboration
A High Level of Collaboration among the teacher evaluation committee as well as the administrator evaluation committee. The union is part of both committees
Teachscape
We are ahead of the game and leaders with the training that we have been providing
We are requiring all administrators that evaluate teachers to take the teachscape class and Test.
Average about 20-30 practice hours on-lineThe assessment takes between 5-7 hours
to complete 14 started in a new cohort this year.
Weighted Formula75% will be based on Observation
Protocol and the 5 Standards for Effective Teaching.
This includes observations (formal and not formal), walkthroughs, other performance measures that are related to the teacher evaluation rubric which includes all 5 standards. Professional Responsibilities are included as one of the standards.
25% Growth Data
5% District growth based on state accountability measures
10% Building Growth
10% Classroom Growth
10% Building Growth Data Elementary -SRI, DRA & DRA task analysis, Star
Math, 6 plus 1 traits, Building/District Common Assessments, NWEA, MEAP, Art, Music and & PE common Assessments.
Middle School -SRI, DRA, Star Math, 6 plus 1 traits, Building/District Common Assessments, NWEA, MEAP, Art, Music and & PE common Assessments, and Explore.
High School- Explore, Plan, MME, MEAP, SRI, Star Math, Common Assessments, AP exams, and Departmental Assessments.
10% Classroom Growth Data
10% Classroom Growth based on State Assessments, District Common Assessments or Classroom Assessments (ex. Performance or product measures or other formative assessments, pre and post tests are required).
Proposed Legislation in Lansing To Administrator and Teacher Evaluations
House Bill 5223 (MCL 380.1249 & 380.1531j)
Would revise current evaluation requirements for teachers, and require that school districts meet new requirements for school administrator evaluations, as described in detail in House Bill 5224.
Other Proposed Requirements
A teacher be must observed at least two times each year, unless the teacher had received a rating of effective or highly effective on the two most recent evaluations. Using the same evaluation tool.
Student Growth and Assessment Component
House Bill 5223 requires that the student growth and assessment component of a teacher's evaluation consist of the state student growth and assessment measurement standards
40% of the teacher Growth Data Component would be based on state provided data
Proposed Growth Data Continued
Assuming that the state-provided growth data was available in the content areas and in the grades where the teachers provide instruction.
A local student growth assessment can be included and must be where state data is not available
School Level Aggregate Data can be part of the evaluation.
Student Growth Data Included in Evaluations by
State Mandate
March 1st, 2014 Deadline
Under the bill, the Michigan Department of Education would be required to develop state student growth and assessment measurement standards not later than March 1, 2014. The measurement standards would have to meet all of the following requirements:
4 Tools To Choose From
Council for Educator Effectiveness, including:
1. Charlotte Danielson's Framework for
Teaching; 2. The Marzano Teacher Evaluation3. Five Dimensions4. Thoughtful Classroom
HB 5224 Administrator Evaluation
Schools may use one of the following frameworks:
1. The school advance administrator evaluation instrument developed by Reeves and McNeill for the Michigan Association of School Administrators;
2. The Reeves Leadership Performance Rubric;
3. The Marzano tool
Questions or Comments?
Thank you for your support.
top related