static analysis co444h dataflow dataflow frameworkslivshits/classes/co444h/slides/lec2.pdf ·...

Static analysis

Dataflow

Dataflow frameworks

CO444H

Ben Livshits

Master’s Projects Available

1. Crashes to exploits

2. Pointer analysis for JavaScript

3. Private data management languages

4. Programming robots to assemble IKEA furniture

5. Project in software security

6. Security vulnerabilities in web browsers

7. Toward auditable financial software

8. User tracking in mobile browsers

2

3

We are in the Idealized World of CFGs

t = x+ya = t

t = x+yb = t

c = t

t = x+ya = t

b = t

c = t

t = x+yb = t

Data Flow Equations

4

Dataflow Analysis

• Computes facts about values in the program

• Little or no interaction between facts

• Based on all paths through program

• Including, sometimes, infeasible paths

• Let’s consider some dataflow analyses…

5

Some Static Analysis Goals

• For example• What can values can integer x have?

• What locations can pointer p point to?

• Can double y be negative?

• Can it assume value 17?

• etc.

• This is static reasoning – we are approximating runtime execution here

6

Static vs. Runtime

i = 1;

while(true){

i = i + 2;

if(…) break;

}

• How can we approximate the possible values of i?

• What can we conclude on the basis of this code?

7

i = 1;

while(i < 1000){

i = i + 2;

a = i*2;

}

• How about now?

Examples of Dataflow Analysis

•We will cover three common types of analysis• Reaching definitions• Available expressions• Live variables

8

Reaching Definitions

9

Reaching Definitions

• We will start this discussion by talking about an analysis called Reaching Definitions…

• A basic block can generate a definition

• A basic block can either• Kill a definition of x if it surely redefines x

• Transmit a definition if it may not redefine the same variable(s) as that definition

10

11

IN and OUT

The following sets are defined:

• IN(B) = set of definitions reaching the beginning of block B

• OUT(B) = set of definitions reaching the end of B

12

Equations

Two kinds of equations:

• Confluence equations: IN(B) in terms of OUTs of predecessors of B

• Transfer equations: OUT(B) in terms of IN(B) and what goes on in block B

13

Confluence Equations

IN(B) = ∪predecessors P of B OUT(P)

P2

B

P1

{d1, d2, d3}

{d2, d3}{d1, d2}

14

Transfer Equations

• Generate a definition in the block if its variable is not definitely rewritten later in the basic block

• Kill a definition if its variable is definitely rewritten in the block

• An internal definition may be both killed and generated

Example: GEN and KILL

15

• For each basic block B1, B2, B3 we can compute GEN and KILL sets independently

• These will be part of the transfer function

16

Transfer Function for a Block

Connecting IN and OUT sets…

For any block B:

OUT(B) = (IN(B) – Kill(B)) ∪ Gen(B)

17

Iterative Solution --- (2)

IN(entry) = ∅;

for each block do OUT(B)= ∅;

while (changes occur) do

for each block B do {

IN(B) = ∪predecessors P of B OUT(P);

OUT(B) = (IN(B) – Kill(B)) ∪ Gen(B);

}

18

Iterative Solution to Equations

• For an n-block flow graph, there are 2*n equations and 2*n unknowns.

• Alas, the solution is not unique.

• Standard theory assumes a field of constants; sets are not a field.

• Use iterative solution to get the least fixedpoint.

• Identifies any def that might reach a point

Reaching Definitions: Algorithm in Action

19

d1: x = 5

if x == 10

d2: x = 15

B1

B3

B2

IN(B1) = {}

OUT(B1) = {

OUT(B2) = {

OUT(B3) = {

d1}

IN(B2) = {d1,

d1,

IN(B3) = {d1,

d2}

d2}

d2}

d2}

A bit-vector representation for greater computational efficiency

20

Aside: Notice the Conservatism

• Not only the most conservative assumption about when a def is KILLed or GEN’d

• Also the conservative assumption that any path in the flow graph can actually be taken

• Also, this is a may analysis, not a must analysis

21

Available Expressions

22

23

Another Data-Flow Problem: Available Expressions

• An expression x+y is available at a point if no matter what path has been taken to that point from the entry, x+y has been evaluated, and neither x nor y have even possibly been redefined

• Useful for global common-subexpression elimination

Available expressions example

24

• Watch out for things that are possibly KILLedby an assignment

2010 Stephen Chong, Harvard University

25

Defining GEN(B) and KILL(B)

• An expression x+y is generated if it is computed in B, and afterwards there is no possibility that either x or y is redefined

• An expression x+y is killed if it is not generated in B and either x or y is possibly redefined

26

Equations for Available Expressions

• The equations for AE are essentially the same as for RD, with one exception

• Confluence of paths involves intersection of sets of expressions rather than union of sets of definitions

• Available expressions is a forward must analysis• Forward means that data facts flow from IN to OUT

• Must means that join points, only keep facts that hold on all paths that are joined

27

Example of GEN and KILL for Available Expressions

x = x+y

z = a+b

Generatesa+b

Kills x+y,w*x, etc.

Kills z-w,x+z, etc.

28

Transfer Equations

• Transfer equation is exactly the same as before:

OUT(B) = (IN(B) – Kill(B)) ∪ Gen(B)

•Which is good – we can use the same template for all GEN/KILL problems

29

Confluence Equations

• Confluence involves intersection, because an expression is available coming into a block if and only if it is available coming out of each predecessor

IN(B) = ∩predecessors P of B OUT(P)

30

Iterative Solution

IN(entry) = ∅;

for each block B do OUT(B)= ALL;

while (changes occur) do

for each block B do {

IN(B) = ∩predecessors P of B OUT(P);

OUT(B) = (IN(B) – Kill(B)) ∪ Gen(B);

}

31

Why It Works

• An expression x+y is unavailable at point p iff there is a path from the entry to p that either:

1. Never evaluates x+y, or

2. Kills x+y after its last evaluation

• IN(entry) = ∅ takes care of #1 above

• OUT(B) = ALL, plus intersection during iteration handles #2 above

32

Example of Why We Want Intersection

point p

Entry

x+ynevergen’d

x+y killed

x+yneverGEN’d

33

Subtle Point

• It is conservative to assume an expression isn’t available, even if it is

• But we don’t have to be “insanely conservative”• If after considering all paths, and assuming x+y killed by

any possibility of redefinition, we still can’t find a path explaining its unavailability, then x+y is available

• This is a delicate dance between soundness and precision

How Would the Algorithm Change for A Backwards Analysis?

34

Live Variables

35

36

Live Variable Analysis

• Variable x is live at a point p if on some path from p, x is used before it is redefined

• Useful in code generation: if x is not live on exit from a basic block, there is no need to copy x from a register to memory

• Captures if there is a demand for a variable

37

Equations for Live Variables

• LV is essentially a “backwards” version of RD

• In place of GEN(B): Use(B) = set of variables xpossibly used in B prior to any certain definition of x

• In place of KILL(B): Def(B) = set of variables xcertainly defined before any possible use of x

38

Transfer Equations

• Transfer equations give IN’s in terms of OUT’s:

IN(B) = (OUT(B) – Def(B)) ∪ Use(B)

• This is a little different – the direction is reversed

39

Confluence Equations

• Confluence involves union over successors, so a variable is in OUT(B) if it is live on entry to any of B’s successors.

OUT(B) = ∪successors S of B IN(S)

40

Iterative Solution for Live Variables

OUT(exit) = ∅;

for each block B do IN(B)= ∅;

while (changes occur) do

for each block B do {

OUT(B) = ∪successors S of B IN(S);

IN(B) = (OUT(B) – Def(B)) ∪ Use(B);

}

Data-Flow Frameworks

Lattice-Theoretic Formulation

Meet-Over-Paths Solution

Monotonicity/Distributivity41

Data-Flow Analysis Frameworks

• Generalizes and unifies each of the DFA examples from previous lecture.

• Important ingredients :

42

Element Symbol Explanation

Direction D forward or backward

Domain V (possible values for IN, OUT)

Meet operator ∧ (effect of path confluence)

Transfer functions F (effect of passing through a basic block)

43

Good News!

•All three analyses above fit the model• RD’s: Forward, meet = union, transfer

functions based on GEN and KILL• AE’s: Forward, meet = intersection,

transfer functions based on GEN and KILL• LV’s: Backward, meet = union, transfer

functions based on USE and DEF

May vs. Must Analysis

May Must

Forward Reaching definitions

Available expressions

Backward Live variables Very busy expressions

44

45

Semilattices

We stay that a set V and operation meet (denoted ∧) form a semilattice if for all x, y, and z in V:

1. x ∧ x = x (idempotence)

2. x ∧ y = y ∧ x (commutativity)

3. x ∧ (y ∧ z) = (x ∧ y) ∧ z (associativity )

4. Top element ⊤ such that for all x, ⊤∧ x = x.

5. Bottom element (optional) ⊥ such that for all x: ⊥ ∧ x = ⊥

Available expressions (semi)lattice

46

In this example we have a+b, a+1, a*b as possible computations in this program

47

Example: Semilattice

• V = power set of some set (like previous example)

•∧ = union

• Union is idempotent, commutative, and associative

• What are the top and bottom elements?

48

Partial Order for a Semilattice

• Say x ≤ y iff x ∧ y = x

• Also, x < y iff x ≤ y and x ≠ y

• ≤ is really a partial order:1. x ≤ y and y ≤ z imply x ≤ z (proof in the Dragon book)

2. x ≤ y and y ≤ x iff x = y.

Proof:

• x ∧ y = x and y ∧ x = y.

• Thus, x = x ∧ y = y ∧ x = y

49

Axioms for Transfer Functions

• Transfer function F includes the identity function• Why needed? Constructions often require introduction

of an empty block.

2. F is closed under composition.

• Why needed?• The concatenation of two blocks is a block.

• Transfer function for a block can be constructed from individual statements.

50

Example: Reaching Definitions

• Direction D = forward.

• Domain V = set of all sets of definitions in the flow graph.

• ∧ = union.

• Functions F = all “gen-kill” functions of the form f(x) = (x - K) ∪ G, where KILL and GEN are sets of definitions (members of V).

51

Example: Satisfies Axioms

• Union on a power set forms a semilattice(idempotent, commutative, associative).

• Identity function: let K = G = ∅.

• Composition: A little algebra.

52

Example: Partial Order

• For RD’s, S ≤ T means S ∪ T = S.

• Equivalently S ⊇ T.• Seems “backward,” but that’s what the definitions give

you

• Intuition: ≤ measures “ignorance.”• The more definitions we know about, the less

ignorance we have.

• ⊤ = “total ignorance.”

53

DFA Frameworks

• (D, V, ∧, F)

• A flow graph, with an associated function fB in F for each block B

• A boundary value vENTRY or vEXIT if D = forward or backward, respectively.

54

Iterative Algorithm (Forward)

OUT[entry] = vENTRY;

for (other blocks B) OUT[B] = ⊤;

while (changes to any OUT)

for (each block B) {

IN(B) = ∧ predecessors P of B OUT(P);

OUT(B) = fB(IN(B));

}

Iterative Algorithm (Backward)

Almost the same thing – just make a few changes:

1. Swap IN and OUT everywhere2. Replace ENTRY by EXIT

55

GCC optimizations

56

• Why does gccgenerate 15-20% faster code if I optimize for size instead of speed?

• http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19470873/why-does-gcc-generate-15-20-faster-code-if-i-optimize-for-size-instead-of-speed

Multiple Processors

57

• By default compilers optimize for "average" processor. Since different processors favordifferent instruction sequences, compiler optimizations enabled by -O2might benefit average processor, but decreaseperformance on your particular processor (and the same applies to -Os).

• If you try the same example on different processors, you will find that on some of them benefit from -O2 while other are more favorable to -Osoptimizations