soil testing methods: how they affect fertilizer and lime recommendations f.j. sikora, ph.d....

Post on 16-Dec-2015

216 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Soil Testing Methods: How they affect fertilizer and lime

recommendations

F.J. Sikora, Ph.D.University of Kentucky

20th annual Kentuckiana Crop Production SeminarDec. 9-10, 2003

Executive Inn – Owensboro, Kentucky

Nutrient recommendations

Soil acidity

Available plant nutrients

Interpretation of lab results

Nutrient recommendations

Soil acidity

Available plant nutrients

Interpretation of lab results

Nutrient re

commendations

Available plant nutrients

Interpretation of lab results

Soil acidity

Available plant nutrients

Interpretation of lab results

First stool leg

Most agronomic crops 6.4

Tobacco 6.6

Alfalfa 6.8

Target pH

Water pH

Buffer pHSoil pH

Active acidity Residual acidity

They measure……

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Mg2+

K+

H+

Ca2+

Ca2+

Mg2+

K+

Ca2+

Na+

K+

Na+H+

Ca2+

K+

Mg2+

Mg2+

K+

H+

H+

H+

Ca2+

Mg2+

K+

H+

Soil pH measures Active acidity

10 g soil + 10 ml water

pH electrode

H+

H+

H+

H+

H+

H+ H+

H+

H+

H+

H+H+

H+

soil

part

icle

B-

B-B-B-

B- B-B-B-

H+

H+

H+

H+

soil

part

icle

pH e

lect

rode

pH of buffer alone

7.5

Soil Buffer pH6.8

Soil Buffer pH6.4

Active and Residual acidity

x

y

Acidity (meq/100g) = 6.2 x (7.5 – Buffer pH)

SMP Buffer

SMP buffer

Mehlich buffer

Adam and Evans buffer

Initial pH

7.5

6.6

8.0

Woodruff buffer7.0

UK standard

Soil acidity

Available plant nutrients

Interpretation of lab results

Second stool leg

P

PotassiumPhosphorus

Concentration of P and K in soil that is related to plant-available P and K

They measure……

K

Common soil extractants

Bray I

Mehlich I

Ammonium Acetate (for K)

Bray II (for P)

Mehlich III UK standard

Mehlich I =

Mixture of2 acids

whole pie is total P

SOIL

Mehlich III

whole pie is total P

SOIL

Mixture of1 acid+ fluoride+ salt+ chelate+ pH buffer

Extractant P (lbs/acre)

Bray I 112

Bray II 212

Mehlich I 46

Mehlich III 90

Comparison of 6 extractants for soil test P

NAPT sample 2003-110: Rozetta silt loam from Bureau Co., IL. Soil pH = 6.5, CEC = 8.3

Extractant K (lbs/acre)

Bray I 272

Mehlich I 250

Mehlich III 332

Am. Acet. 330

Comparison of 6 extractants for soil test K

NAPT sample 2003-110: Rozetta silt loam from Bureau Co., IL. Soil pH = 6.5, CEC = 8.3

Variation in how 45 Laboratories in North America report Mehlich III Soil Test P and K

Source - NAPT, 2nd quarter 2000

1 lab reports as lbs/acre-6 inches

2 labs report as lbs/ppm

2 labs report as ppm/lbs/acre

1 lab repors an index

3 labs reports as kg/ha

1 lab reports as mg/L

20 labs report as mg/kg

15 labs report as lbs/acre

Mehlich III in lbs/acre

UK standard for P and K

mg/kg x 2 = lbs/acre

Soil acidity

Available plant nutrients

Interpretation of lab results

Third stool leg

High

Med

Low

V.Low

Soil Test Level

100%

70-100%

50-70%

<50%

Sufficiency Level

Nutrients available from soil

External nutrients required

soil

soil

soil

soil

fertilizer

fertilizer

fert.

Relative Sources of Nutrients

0 1

Soil Test P (lbs/acre)40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

Yie

ld (

% o

f m

axim

um

)

60305

Soil Test P (lbs/acre)

Low

MedHigh

V.low

Agronomic Threshold

3 philosophies with a high soil test

Time (years)

So

il t

est

P o

r K

Agronomic Threshold

maintenance

sufficiency

buildup

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Dol

lars

/acr

e

Lincoln Co Lawrence Co.

UT lablab Alab B

Fertilizer costs for Corn Production

* Data from H.J. Savoy, Univ. of Tenn.

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

Bus

hels

/acr

e

Lincoln Co Lawrence Co.

UT lablab Alab B

Corn Yields

* Data from H.J. Savoy, Univ. of Tenn.

top related