sinking and swimming understanding britain’s unmet needs will norman

Post on 23-Feb-2016

48 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Sinking and Swimming Understanding Britain’s Unmet Needs Will Norman. A national study looking at unmet material and psychological needs – to guide foundations, policy and priorities for action and innovation. Consortium of Programme Funders Baring Foundation                            - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Slide 1 The Young Foundation 2009

Sinking and SwimmingUnderstanding Britain’s Unmet NeedsWill Norman

Slide 2 The Young Foundation 2009

A national study looking at unmet material and psychological needs – to guide foundations, policy and priorities for action and innovation.

Slide 3 The Young Foundation 2009

Consortium of Programme FundersBaring Foundation                            Barrow Cadbury Trust  Bedford Charity (The Harpur Trust)Big Lottery FundCity Bridge Trust   City Parochial Foundation      Comic Relief       Economic and Social Research Council John Lyon’s Charity                          Joseph Rowntree Foundation     LankellyChase Foundation                        Northern Rock Foundation Wates Foundation

Consortium of Programme AdvisorsLord Moser, Senior AdvisorProf Suzanne Fitzpatrick, York UniversityProf Ian Gough, University of BathProf Danny Dorling, Sheffield UniversityKaren Dunnell, Head of ONS

Prof Mike Savage, Manchester UniversityNorman Glass, CEO of NatCen

Peter Taylor-Gooby, University of KentProf Roger Jowell, City University  Prof Ruth Lister, Loughborough University

Slide 4 The Young Foundation 2009

• Statistical analysis, ethnography and analysis of causes • Futures analysis – what needs are set to intensify

Case studies – transitions (in England and Scotland - care, prison, bereavement), night working, London (teenagers, refugees, older people), Teesside (families), Bedford (teenagers), Wales (workless families).

Real life, public perspectives

Front line workers

Local agencies’

knowledge

‘Expert’ knowledge

Slide 5 The Young Foundation 2009

Analysis

Slide 6 The Young Foundation 2009

Percentage of UK individuals in relative poverty after housing costs 1979 to 2007/08.

Source ONS Social Trends 2009

Slide 7 The Young Foundation 2009

UK distribution of household income – average up, stretched at the top, sagging at the bottom.

Slide 8 The Young Foundation 2009

Percentages of households who cannot afford basic possessions and activities by [unadjusted] household income (2007/08)

Slide 9 The Young Foundation 2009

UK distribution of psychological well being – most contented but long and thickening tail of unhappiness, loneliness and stress.

Slide 10 The Young Foundation 2009

The bottom million?Percentage responses to questions on emotional support 2007/08

Source: BHPS analysis

Slide 11 The Young Foundation 2009

Percentage of UK sample with poor psychological well being (high GHQ12) by selected variables (2006/07)

Slide 12 The Young Foundation 2009

Case Studies

Slide 13 The Young Foundation 2009

Digging deeper into the lives of groups identified as facing serious unmet needs

Slide 14 The Young Foundation 2009

Transitions – from care, prison, bereavement…

Showing the importance of preparation, bridging relationships, assets to help after the transition and also how rare these are

Slide 15 The Young Foundation 2009

Bedford (teenagers/NEETs): showing importance of help-seeking, resilience, attitude, social networks

Slide 16 The Young Foundation 2009

Teesside (low income families) – showing strength of family and informal social supports

Slide 17 The Young Foundation 2009

South Wales (workless households) – showing extent of worklessness, relative resilience but lack of adaptive resilience

Slide 18 The Young Foundation 2009

London (refugees) – showing lack of cash, importance of religious and family networks, importance of access to technology – eg mobile phones

Slide 19 The Young Foundation 2009

Older people (several case studies) emphasising loneliness and isolation, atrophy of traditional supports

Slide 20 The Young Foundation 2009

Nightworkers - looking at the social needs and pressures associated with regularly working at night

looking at whether the needs encountered by service providers differ during the night

Slide 21 The Young Foundation 2009

Futures

Slide 22 The Young Foundation 2009

Long period of constrained public funding.

Pressures on housing, inequality, fuel and food prices, ageing, diversity, but also ...

Slide 23 The Young Foundation 2009

Anxiety and Depressions – Doubling in a generation

Slide 24 The Young Foundation 2009

Obesity – Doubling in a new generation

Slide 25 The Young Foundation 2009

Every particular example needs to be understood in three dimensions …

Slide 26 The Young Foundation 2009

Conceptual framework for understanding how needs are met – and what can go wrong

Need felt or identified

Satisfaction

Demand expression

Availability External Activation

Identification

Process

Internal activation

Subjective experience

Potential barriers

Need expressed

effectively as demand for

existing satisfier

Need acknowledg

ed as satisfiable

and a priority for

action

Need satisfied

Satisfier provided in full, in time

and effectively

Satisfier available,

affordable, accessible, offered and

accepted

I am getting Y as

promised

They are offering me Y

in an acceptable way at an

acceptable time, place

and price and with

acceptable reciprocal demands

Here is my need X, please

provide me with satisfier Y to which I am entitled by virtue of

Z

This need can be met. I have a right

to have it met and it is

important that it be

met. I want it met.

I’m suffering or

if I don’t get this

sorted I will suffer

Y seems to work, my need is being met

Lack of knowledge, absence of perceived suffering,

cognitive or mental health

impairment, denial

Service provided partially,

badly or at the wrong

time, service

different from that promised

Non-existence of

satisfier, rationing, expense,

ineligibility, inaccessibility

, exclusion, conditionality

Lack of confidence, assertivenes

s, power, opportunity,

support, legitimacy, knowledge, language

determination or

organization; wrong

approach, strategy, timing or

data

Lack of awareness

and motivation,

pride, stigma,

mistrust, bad previous

experience, competing priorities,

hyper-stress, culture, perverse

incentives, fatalism, learned

helplessness

Need more complex

than thought,

dependent upon

resolution of other

needs, only temporarily met, or met

in a way that causes more need

Slide 27 The Young Foundation 2009

Implications and directions for action1. Support organisations

providing preparation, bridges and support for difficult transitions

2. Back projects that tackle isolation – help to connect the disconnected

3. Support projects providing access with ‘no wrong door’

4. Support projects that enhance resilience and psychological fitness

Slide 28 The Young Foundation 2009

Implications and directions for action5. Rethink welfare provision

through the lens of wellbeing 6. Support the provision of new

and old necessities7. Invest in better social accounts

Slide 29 The Young Foundation 2009

What next?Ageing: linking research, programmes and new ventures (with primary focus on transitions, new service models, psychological/psycho-social needs, long-term conditions, and community support)

Transitions to adulthood: linking research, programmes and new ventures, with a particular emphasis on preparation, bridging roles, and supports for transitions, building on work on transition to adulthood, teenage pregnancy, youth crime work.

Slide 30 The Young Foundation 2009

Resilience• Personal attitudes, skills, dispositions• Close networks• Assets (financial and other)• We want to explore what’s known about it, how it can be enhanced, the roles of different kinds of voluntary organisation, professions etc.

Slide 31 The Young Foundation 2009

Replication & InnovationWe’ve identified the problems that are getting worse. How do we solve them?

1. Clear need, effective response, government unwilling to act.

2. Emerging models and potential commissioning by government.

3. Needs where solutions don’t work well require experimentation and genuine innovation.

Slide 32 The Young Foundation 2009

The Young Foundation’s business is social innovation: finding and developing new and better ways of meeting pressing unmet needs.

We undertake research to identify and understand unmet social needs and then develop practical initiatives and institutions to address them – in fields as diverse as health and education, housing and cities. Our work combines research, applied work and practical action.For more information go to: youngfoundation.org

top related