simulations and gmpes...m6.5, dip 60 (0.2 sec and 1 sec) m6.5, dip 60 (3 sec and 5 sec) thank you...
Post on 09-Jul-2020
4 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
COMPARISON OF SIMULATIONS AND GMPES Jennifer L Donahue, PhD, PE Senior Engineer Geosyntec Consultants SWUS Ground Motion – Workshop 2 SSHAC Level III 22 October 2013
Agenda • Are the three methods similar and how do they compare
to the GMPEs? • How well is the magnitude scaling constrained? • Overview of simulations and GMPEs
FFS Results for M6.5, Dip 45 – Short Periods
FFS Results for M6.5, Dip 60 – Short Periods
FFS Results for M7, Dip 45 – Short Periods
FFS Results for M6.5, Dip 45 – Long Periods
FFS Results for M6.5, Dip 60 – Long Periods
FFS Results for M7, Dip 45 – Long Periods
MAGNITUDE SCALING EFFECTS
M5.5, Dip 45 (0.2 sec and 1 sec)
M6, Dip 45 (0.2 sec and 1 sec)
M6.5, Dip 45 (0.2 sec and 1 sec)
M7, Dip 45 (0.2 sec and 1 sec)
M5.5, Dip 45 (3 sec and 5 sec)
M6, Dip 45 (3 sec and 5 sec)
M6.5, Dip 45 (3 sec and 5 sec)
M7, Dip 45 (3 sec and 5 sec)
M6.5, Dip 60 (0.2 sec and 1 sec)
M6.5, Dip 60 (3 sec and 5 sec)
THANK YOU
top related