section 1. west/new ulm section 2. courtland · a2b north of courtland x2c. eliminate;...
Post on 09-Oct-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
24
12
37
68
25
21
21
14
US 14 Corridor Study/EISNew Ulm to North Mankato
Printed July 20, 20040 7,000 14,0003,500 Feet
1 inch equals 3,500 feet
Figure 1: Preliminary Alternative Alignment ScreeningNew Ulm/West & Courtland Sections
X1A. Eliminate northern most portion; A1B refinement with X1A will be "best balanced"
A1A. Retain, refine
A1B. Retain, refine to "best balance" with X1A
X1D. Eliminate;Bluff impacts
X1B. Eliminate due to ravine,impacts
X1C. Eliminate due to ravine,impacts; A1B will be "best balanced"
X1E. Eliminate;Bluff impacts; Fails to meet access management objectives in residential and school area
A2B. Retain; Requires refinement to address interchange design and to avoid cemetery and wetlands; Connect to A1B only
A2A. Retain and refine; Connect only to A1Atowards west
X2E. Eliminate; A2A is a more optimal alignment
X2A. Eliminate; Very high impacts to Courtland
A2C. Retain by definition;common optimal alignment for A2A and A2B
X2B.Eliminate; Inefficient; Unnecessary residentialand farmland impacts
A1B. Refine to connect with ONLYA2B North of Courtland
X2C.Eliminate; Unnecessarily impactsresidences and cemetery
X2D. Eliminate; Too far north to justify
Legend
Alignment Alternatives Eliminated from Detailed Environmental Review
Alignment Alternatives Retained for Detailed Environmental Review
Section 1. West/New Ulm Section 2. Courtland
X2D. Continued.
top related