search for higgs bosons beyond the standard model with...
Post on 21-Oct-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
Second MCTP Spring Symposium on Higgs Boson PhysicsAnn Arbor, April 16-20, 2012
Search for Higgs Bosons Beyond the StandardModel with ATLAS
Christoph AndersOn behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration
Universität Heidelberg
April 18th 2012
-
Overview 2/26
Fermiophobic Higgs bosonsH → γγMSSM neutral Higgs bosonsh/H/A→ ττCharged Higgs bosons:
H+ → τhadνH+ → τ`νH+ → cs̄
Doubly charged Higgs bosonsH++ → µ+µ+
NMSSM light neutral Higgs bosonsa1 → µµ
New preliminary resultswith 4.9fb−1
Preliminary results with 1.06fb−1
Submitted to JHEPlast week! (4.7fb−1)
Preliminary results with 0.035fb−1
Published in PRL(1.6fb−1)
Preliminary results with 0.037fb−1
-
Fermiophobic Higgs Bosons I 3/26Basics
2HDM and Higgs triplet models withreduced couplings to fermions.Simple benchmark scenario:
No fermion-Higgs couplingsSM boson-Higgs couplings
Production in VBF and associatedwith W /Z
Decay: γγ, WW , ZZ , Zγ
σ × BR larger than SM for light Higgsbosons
Higher pT (recoil)
σ × BR:
[GeV]HM100 150 200 250
BR
[pb]
× -310
-210
-110
1
10
210
LHC
HIG
GS
XS W
G 2
011
Fermiophobic = 7TeVs
(SM)
Z (SM)Z
WW
WW (SM)
ZZ
ZZ (SM)
LHC HIGGS XS WG 2011
-
Fermiophobic Higgs Bosons II 4/26Selection (Identical to SM H → γγ)
2 isolated photons,pT > 40 GeV, 25 GeV
100 < mγγ < 160 GeV
9 categories
Presence of photon conversionsPhoton calorimeter impact pointpTt, component of pT ,γγ ⊥ γγ-thrust axis
mγγ signal model:Crystal Ball + wide Gaussian(tail)
mγγ background model:Falling exponential
-
Fermiophobic Higgs Bosons III 5/26Exclusion Limits
Largest excess at mH = 125.5 GeVSignificance including look-elsewhere effect:1.6σ(Or 5% prob. for a background fluctuation)
Exclusion limitsat 95% confidence level using theprofile likelihood method with CLS
Expected mH exclusion:110.0− 123.5 GeVObserved mH exclusion:110.0− 118.0 GeV and119.5− 121.0 GeV
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons I 6/26Basics
2 Higgs-doublets → 5 Higgs bosonsΦ = H, h,A,H±
Free parameters at tree level: mA,tanβ = vu/vd
Enhanced couplings to b and τ in large partsof the parameter space (σbbA ≈ tan2 β)
Production:
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons II 7/26Hadronic Tau Decay Signature and Identification
Typical signature:
One or three charged tracks
Collimated calorimeter energy deposits
Large leading track momentumfraction
Secondary vertex reconstruction
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons III 8/26Selection
e + µ:
1 isolated e,pT > 22 GeV
1 isolated µ,pT > 20 GeV
Opposite charges
∆Φ(e, µ) > 2rad
PeT + PµT + E
missT
< 120 GeV
e/µ+ τhad:
1 isolated e/µ,pT > 25/20 GeV
1 τhad,pT > 20 GeV
Opposite charges
Di-lepton veto
EmissT > 20 GeV
mT < 30 GeV
τhad + τhad:
Di-τhadtrigger
2 τhad,pT > 45/30 GeV
Opposite charges
Light lepton veto
EmissT > 30 GeV
[GeV]µT,
+pT,e
+pT,missE
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Events
/ 1
0 G
eV
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900Data 2011
=20β, tanττ →A(120)/h/H ) embeddedττ→*(γZ/
Others
Diboson
QCD multi-jet
& single-tttsyst.
PreliminaryATLAS
-1Ldt = 1.06 fb∫ = 7 TeV, s
channelµe
[GeV]T,missE
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Eve
nts
/ 2
Ge
V
0
100
200
300
400
500
[GeV]T,missE
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Eve
nts
/ 2
Ge
V
0
100
200
300
400
500Data 2011
=20β, tanττ→A(120)/H/h) emb.(OS-SS)ττ→*(γZ/
Others(OS-SS)
W+jets (OS-SS)
Same Sign
stat.
channelshad
τµ + hadτe
-1 L = 1.06 fb∫ = 7TeV, s
ATLAS Preliminary
[GeV]missTE
0 20 40 60 80 100E
vents
/ 5
GeV
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
[GeV]missTE
0 20 40 60 80 100E
vents
/ 5
GeV
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140 Data 2011=20β, tanττ →A(200)/H/h
Multi-Jet
)ττ→*(γZ/
) + jetsντ→W(
Others
stat.
-1Ldt = 1.06 fb∫ = 7 TeV, s
PreliminaryATLAS
channelhad
τhad
τ
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons IV 9/26Mass Reconstruction
Invariant mass mvis of visible decay products
Effective mass: meff =√
(pe + pµ + pmiss)2, withpmiss = (E
missT ,E
missx ,E
missy ,E
missz = 0).
New method called Missing Mass Calculator (MMC)(see arXiv:1012.4686)
MMC (lep-had case):7 unknowns: “Missing” 3-momenta and massof νν system
4 constraints: EmissT ,x , EmissT ,y , mτ1 , mτ2
→ scan ∆Φ1(ντ , h), ∆Φ2(ντν`, `), mννWeight solutions according to probability of 3Dangle in solution ↘
Maximum of weighted mττdistribution is the MMC mass mMMC
meff :
mMMC:
[rad]3Dθ∆0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
Arb
itrar
y un
its
0
0.005
0.01
0.015 ATLAS Simulation
Simulationττ→Z
Probability function
decayτ1-prong 50 [GeV]≤τ45
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons V 10/26Background Estimation
Based on data control samples:
Z/γ∗ → ττ from “τ -embedded”Z/γ∗ → µµ data sampleQCD multijet backgrounds fromcontrol samples with same-signcharges and low EmissT orinverted lepton isolation
W+jets from high mT (`,EmissT )
control region
[GeV]ττMMC m
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Eve
nts
/ 10
GeV
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
µ µ →* γEmbedded Z/
MCτ τ →* γZ/
channelshadτµ + hadτe
-1L dt = 1.06 fb∫ = 7 TeV, s
ATLAS Preliminary
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons IV 11/26Results
e + µ: e/µ+ τhad: τhad + τhad:
effective [GeV]ττm
0 50 100 150 200 250
Eve
nts
/ 10
GeV
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700 Data 2011=20β, tanττ →A(120)/h/H
) embeddedττ→*(γZ/OthersDibosonQCD multi-jet
& single-tttsyst.
PreliminaryATLAS
-1Ldt = 1.06 fb∫ = 7 TeV, s
channelµe
[GeV]ττMMC m
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Eve
nts
/ 10
GeV
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
[GeV]ττMMC m
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Eve
nts
/ 10
GeV
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400Data 2011
=20β, tanττ→A(120)/H/h) emb.(OS-SS)ττ→*(γZ/
Others(OS-SS)W+jets (OS-SS)Same Signstat.
channelshad
τµ + hadτe
-1 L = 1.06 fb∫ = 7TeV, sATLAS Preliminary
visible [GeV]ττm
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Eve
nts
/ 15
GeV
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
visible [GeV]ττm
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Eve
nts
/ 15
GeV
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70Data 2011
=20β, tanττ →A(200)/H/h
Multi-Jet
)ττ→*(γZ/
) + jetsντ→W(
Others
stat.
-1Ldt = 1.06 fb∫ = 7 TeV, s PreliminaryATLAS
channelhadτhadτ
Final state Exp. Background Data
eµ (2.6± 0.2)× 103 2472`τhad (2.1± 0.4)× 103 1913τhadτhad 233
+44−28 245
Sum (4.9± 0.6)× 103 4630
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons VII 12/26Exclusion Limits (ATLAS-CONF-2011-132)
[GeV]φm
100 200 300 400 500 600
) [p
b]
ττ →φ
BR
(× φ
σ95%
CL u
pp
er
limit o
n
-110
1
10
210
310 CLsφ →Observed gg
φ →Expected gg
CLsφObserved bb
φExpected bb) theory ττ→
SM x BR(H
SMσ
-1 Ldt = 1.06 fb∫ = 7 TeV, s
All channels
ATLAS Preliminary
[GeV]Am
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450β
tan
0
10
20
30
40
50
60All channels
-1 Ldt = 1.06 fb∫ = 7 TeV, s
>0µ, maxhm
ATLAS Preliminary
Observed CLs
Expected CLs
σ 1±σ 2±
LEP
observed-1
ATLAS 36 pb
expected-1
ATLAS 36 pb
σ × BR(Φ→ ττ)
Assume only one resonnance Φ
Pure gg → Φ or pure bbΦ production
mA, tan β plane
Need to assume specific (c)MSSM scenario
Here: mmaxh scenario
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons VIII 13/26Comparison of Search Channels
[GeV]Am
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
βta
n
0
10
20
30
40
50
60All channels
-1 Ldt = 1.06 fb∫ = 7 TeV, s
>0µ, maxhm
ATLAS Preliminary
Observed (hh only)
Observed (lh only)
Observed (emu only)
Observed CLs
Expected (hh only)
Expected (lh only)
Expected (emu only)
Expected CLs
LEP
Update to full 4.9fb−1 data set and with inclusion of b-tagging inprogress!
-
Charged Higgs Bosons I 14/26Basics
Predicted in Higgs doublet (e.g.MSSM) and triplet models
mH+ < mt : dominantly produced intop quark decays
mH+ > mt : gb → tH+ production
important (more data needed)
For tanβ > 3 preferred decay mode isH+ → τν (here: assume 100%, unless MSSM)
Channels:
-
Charged Higgs Bosons II 15/26Lepton+Jets Channel – Selection
1 isolated e/µ, pT > 25/20 GeV
≥ 4jets (2 b-tagged), pT > 20 GeVEmissT > 40 GeV if |Φ`,miss| ≥ π/6
EmissT × | sin Φ`,miss| > 20 GeV if |Φ`,miss| < π/6
Minimize χ2 =(mjjb−mtop)
2
σ2top+
(mjj−mW )2
σ2W
to get “hadronic side”
Discriminating variables: cos Θ∗` =2m2bl
m2top−m2W
− 1 ≈ 4pb·p`
m2top−m2W
− 1
(mHT )2 = (
√m2top + ( ~pT
` + ~pTb + ~pT
miss)2 − pbT)2 − ( ~pT` + ~pTmiss)2
Discriminatesbetween e/µfrom W andτ .
Lower boundon chargedboson(W /H+) mass
Signal region: cos Θ∗` < −0.6 and mEmissT ,`
T < 60 GeV
-
Charged Higgs Bosons III 16/26Lepton+Jets – Channel Results
Dominant background: tt̄, simulated withMC@NLO, normalized in −0.2 < cos Θ∗` < 1data control region
Misidentified-lepton background determinatedfrom control sample with loosened lepton ID
-
Charged Higgs Bosons IV 17/26τhad+Lepton Channel – Selection
1 τhad, pT > 20 GeV
1 e/µ, pT > 25/20 GeV, opposite charge
≥ 2 jets, pT > 20 GeV, including ≥ 1 b-tagged jet∑ptracksT > 100 GeV, for tracks asociated to
primary vertex
Discriminatingvariable: EmissT−→
Misidentified taus background:e: ≈ 1%, jets: ≈ 55%; jet→τhadmis-ID measured with W+jetsTrue tau background taken from simulation
-
Charged Higgs Bosons V 18/26τhad+Lepton Channel – Candidate Event
-
Charged Higgs Bosons VI 19/26τhad+jets Channel – Selection
τhad+ EmissT trigger
1 τhad, pT > 40 GeV
≥ 4 jets, pT > 20 GeV, at least one b-tagged
Veto: ≥ 2 τhad and light leptons
EmissT significance:EmissT
0.5√∑
pT> 13 GeV1/2
EmissT > 65 GeV
jjb combination (highest pT one)consistent with mtop
Discriminating variable:
mT =√
2pτhadT E
missT (1− cos∆φ)
True-tau background estimatedfrom τ embedded µ+jets events(with tt̄ like event topology)
-
Charged Higgs Bosons VII 20/26Results – τhad+jets Channel
Estimate multijet background byfitting EmissT shapes to data incontrol sample with inverted τ and bID.
-
Charged Higgs Bosons VIII 21/26Exclusion Limits (arXiv:1204.2760)
Combination: Tevatron Limits:BR < 15− 20%
-
Charged Higgs Bosons IX 22/26Exclusion Limits – MSSM (arXiv:1204.2760)
Combination:
-
Charged Higgs Bosons XI 23/26H+ → cs̄ (ATLAS-CONF-2011-094)
H+ → cs̄ is sizable fortanβ < 1
Suppress multijetbackground by requiringlarge EmissT and mT
Kinematic fit with W andtop mass contraints to findbest H+ candidate
AssumeBR(H+ → cs̄) = 100%, toset limits on BR(t → H+b)
-
Doubly Charged Higgs 24/26(ATLAS-CONF-2011-127)
Predicted in left-rightsymmetric, Higgs triplet andlittle Higgs models
Select same sign di-muons,pT > 20 GeV
Look for resonance in di-muonmass spectrum
95% confidence limits, exclude:Right-handed Higgs mass < 251 GeVLeft -handed Higgs mass < 355 GeVWith BR(H++ → µµ) = 100%
-
NMSSM a1 → µµ 25/26(ATLAS-CONF-2011-020)
NMSSM: additional complexsinglet scalar field to solve µproblem→ 3 CP-even scalars (h1, h2, h3)and 2 CP-odd scalars (a1, a2)
a1 can be very light, i.e.ma1 < 2mb!
Selection:
Opposite sign di-muons,pµT > 4 GeV
Likelihood ratio selectionbased on µ+µ− vertex χ2
and µ isolation
Limit setting by fit to massspectrum
Υ region excluded
-
Conclusions 26/26
Many interesting beyond SM Higgs scenarios are beingprobed!
New: Fermiphobic H → γγ, charged Higgs H+ → τνMSSM neutral h/H/A→ ττ , charged H+ → cs̄,H++ → µ+µ+, NMSSM a1 → µ+µ−
No indication of a signal yet...but: lots of limits on cross sections and branching ratios!
The searches are being continued with improved methods andnew data.→ There’s still lots of parameter space to cover within thisyear and after!
-
Backup 27/26
BackupBackup
Backup
-
Fermiophobic Higgs Boson 28/26
Systematic uncertainties: Signal Model vs. MC:
Fermiophobic and SM(arXiv:1202.1414) Limit:
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons – MSSM Higgs Sector 29/26
2 Higgs-doublets → 5 Higgs bosonsΦ = H(CP = 1), h(CP = 1),A(CP = −1),H±
Free parameters at tree level: mA, tanβ = vu/vd
Fixed mass relations at tree level:m2H,h =
12
(m2A + m
2Z ±
√(m2A + m
2Z )
2 − 4m2Zm2A cos2 2β)
m2h ≤ m2Z cos2 2β ≤ m2ZUpper mass bound modified byradiative corrections (depending onSUSY parameters)
Benchmark scenarios (everythingfixed but mA, tanβ:
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons – MSSM Higgs Sector II 30/26
Enhanced coupling to 3rd generation:
Dominant production processes: Branching ratios:
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons – Final States andBackgrounds 31/26
Final states considered:
1 “lepton-hadron”: ττ → `τhad (3ν) with ` = e/µ
2 “lepton-lepton”: ττ → eµ(4ν)
3 “hadron-hadron”: ττ → τhadτhad (2ν)
Signal and background samples:
Signal process (mA = 120GeV , tanβ = 20) σ × BR [pb] Generatorbb̄A/H/h(→ ττ) ↘ mh = 118GeV 7.62/0.69/7.3 Sherpagg → A/H/h(→ ττ) mH = 130GeV 4.93/2.21/4.1 POWHegBackground process σ [pb] GeneratorW → `ν (` = e, µ, τ) 10.5× 103 AlpgenZ/γ∗ → `+`− (m`` > 10GeV ) 4.96× 103 Alpgen/Pythiatt̄ 165 MC@NLOSingle-top (t-, s- and Wt-channels) 58.7, 3.9, 13.1 MC@NLO/AcerDi-boson (WW , WZ and ZZ) 46.2, 18.0, 5.6 Herwig/MC@NLOQCD multijet ??? –
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons – MMC 32/26
[rad]3Dθ∆0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
Arb
itrar
y un
its
0
0.005
0.01
0.015 ATLAS Simulation
Simulationττ→Z
Probability function
decayτ1-prong 50 [GeV]≤τ45
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons – Z → ττ Background 33/26
Reliable model of mass distribution shape is essential (lowmass Higgs)
Real Z → ττ data would be ideal, but it cannot be selectedsignal free
Instead: use high purity Z → µµ sample (≈signal free, due tosmall Higgs muon coupling)
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons – Z → ττ Embedding 34/26
Select Z → µµ dataevents
Remove muon tracks andnearby calorimeter cells
Simulate standaloneZ → ττ decays, so that τfour-momenta match theoriginal muon ones
Merge into singleMC-data hybrid event
Re-reconstruct objectsand EmissT
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons – Embedding II 35/26
lep-had: lep-lep:
[GeV]ττMMC m
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Eve
nts
/ 10
GeV
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
µ µ →* γEmbedded Z/
MCτ τ →* γZ/
channelshadτµ + hadτe
-1L dt = 1.06 fb∫ = 7 TeV, s
ATLAS Preliminary
effective [GeV]ττm
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Ent
ries
/ 10
GeV
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
µµ →* γEmbedded Z/
MCττ →* γZ/
PreliminaryATLAS
-1Ldt = 1.06 fb∫ = 7 TeV, s
channelµe
Replaces Z → ττ MC shapes in the following.
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons – Embedding III 36/26
had-had:Z → ττ W → τν
visible [GeV]ττm
0 50 100 150 200
Fra
ctio
n of
Eve
nts
/ 10
GeV
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
µµ→*γEmbedded Z/
MCττ→*γZ/
-1Ldt = 1.06 fb∫ = 7 TeV, s
PreliminaryATLAS channelhadτhadτ
visible [GeV]ττm
0 50 100 150 200
Fra
ctio
n of
Eve
nts
/ 20
GeV
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
νµ→Embedded W
MCντ→W
-1Ldt = 1.06 fb∫ = 7 TeV, s
PreliminaryATLAS channelhadτhadτ
Used as cross check.
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons – Background Estimation –QCD 37/26
Separate QCD estimates for all final states using an“ABCD”-method. 4 regions based on:
lepton-hadron:
Charge product and lepton isolation, shape: region C
lepton-lepton:
Charge product and lepton isolation, shape: region B
hadron-hadron:Charge product and Tau ID, shape: region B
Subtract non QCD backgrounds in CRs B,C,D (for lep-had W+ jetsnormalization is fixed in high mT region)
For lep-had, QCD in signal region A:
nQCDA = rB/D × n(data−non QCD MC)C (similar for lep-lep & had-had)
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons – Estimation of QCD &W+jets in Lepton-Hadron 38/26Basic idea and assumptions
Charge correlation: qlep × qτ =−1→ “Opposite Sign′′(OS) Signal+1→ “Same Sign′′(SS)
=⇒ nBkgOS = nBkgSS + n
QCDOS−SS + n
W +JetsOS−SS + n
ZOS−SS + n
otherOS−SS
≈ 0
Data with qlep × qτ = +1
W+jets: n(OS) > n(SS)
⇒ W+jets Add-On
Normalization from mT > 50 GeVcontrol sampleMMC mass shape from MC
Shape and normalization for Z → ττ andother BGs from Embedding/MC
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons – Background Estimationhad-had 39/26
QCD multijet background from ABCD
Other backgrounds taken from simulation
Corrections for trigger and tau “fake rate” appliedW /Z MC cross-checked with embedding
Tau trigger and ID efficiencies are measured in Z → τhadτµFake tau trigger efficiency and tau fake rate measured inW → µν + jets
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons – Cross-check of 2Background Estimates – lep-had 40/26
Same-Sign method: ABCD method:
[GeV]ττMMC m
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Eve
nts
/ 10
GeV
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
[GeV]ττMMC m
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Eve
nts
/ 10
GeV
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400Data 2011
=20β, tanττ→A(120)/H/h) emb.(OS-SS)ττ→*(γZ/
Others(OS-SS)W+jets (OS-SS)Same Signstat.
channelshad
τµ + hadτe
-1 L = 1.06 fb∫ = 7TeV, sATLAS Preliminary
[GeV]ττMMC m
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Events
/ 1
0 G
eV
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350Data 2011
=20β, tan τ τ →A(120)/H/h
) emb.ττ→(*
γZ/
Others
W+jets
QCD multi-jet
stat.
ATLAS Preliminary
-1Ldt = 1.06 fb∫ = 7 TeV, s
channelshad
τµ + hadτe
Good agreement.
-
Neutral MSSM Higgs Bosons – Systematics 41/26
ll/lh/hh W+jets Di-boson tt̄+ Z/γ∗ → Z/γ∗ → Signal,tanβ = 20single-top ee, µµ τ+τ− 120/120/200GeV
σinclusive -/-/5 7 10 5/5/- 5 14/14/16
Acceptance -/-/20 4/2/7 3/2/9 2/14/- 5/14/14 5/7/9
e efficiency -/-/0.8 4/3.1/0.5 4/3.6/0.3 4/3.1/- 4/3.0/0.5 4/3.6/0.1
µ efficiency -/-/0.3 2/1.2/0.4 2/1.1/0.0 2/1.3/- 2/1.8/0.4 2/1.0/0.1
τ efficiency/fake rate -/-/21 -/9.1/15 -/9.1/13 -/48/- -/9.1/15 -/9.1/15
Energy scales/resolution -/-/+34−21 2/+19−9 /
+26−12 6/
+5−4/12 1/
+39−25/- 1/11/
+63−23 1/
+30−23/
+9−8
Luminosity -/-/3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7/3.7/- 3.7 3.7
Total uncertainty -/-/+45−36 10/+23−16/
+32−22 13/15/23 8/
+64−56/- 9/21/
+67−31 16/
+35−30/
+26−25
Background estimation:
Same Sign stat. 17%
OS/SS ratio 19%
W normalization 11%
Z embedding
-
Charged Higgs Misidentified Lepton BackgroundEstimation 42/26
Control samples, with only lepton ID changed:Tight sample, containing mostly true leptonsLoose sample, containing mostly fake leptons (looser ID&Isolation)Number of mis-IDed and real leptons: NLm, N
Tm , N
Lr , N
Tr
NL = NLm + NLr
NT = NTm + NTr
Number of mis-IDed events passing the selection is then defined as:NTm =
pmpr−pm (prN
L − NT )
with pr =NTrNLr
(from Z → `` events)
and pm =NTmNLm
(from multijet events)
-
Charged Higgs Systematic Uncertainties I 43/26
-
Charged Higgs Systematic Uncertainties II 44/26
-
Doubly Charged Higgs – Yields and More Plots 45/26
-
NMSSM a1 → µµ Systematic Uncertainties 46/26
top related