scoop to win - a survey of dog waste to win – a survey of dog waste ... towards this end,...
Post on 03-May-2018
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Scoop to Win – A Survey of Dog Waste
in the Nisqually Reach and Henderson Inlet Shellfish Protection Districts
Aimee Christy
Pacific Shellfish Institute
120 State Ave NE #1056
Olympia, WA 98501
www.pacshell.org
November, 2011
1.0 Summary
In October, 2011, Pacific Shellfish Institute (PSI) conducted Scoop to Win, a pet waste education
campaign designed to educate citizens about the impact of dog waste on water quality in
urbanized environments. The goals of the campaign were to evaluate the presence and
distribution of dog waste, conduct outreach, identify problem areas, and create fun incentives for
citizens to clean up after their pets. Towards this end, volunteers flagged individual poop piles,
weighed and removed feces, and distributed raffle tickets to responsible dog owners.
During the 1-month campaign, PSI performed outreach at 16 locations within the Henderson
Inlet/Nisqually Shellfish Protection Districts. One to two individuals surveyed each site for 1 ½
to 2 hours focusing attention primarily on trails, sidewalks, tree bases, park perimeters and fence
lines. Several transects were performed across large fields, but these areas were typically not
covered. In total, staff removed over 1200 piles of dog poop totaling more than 125 pounds.
020406080
100120140160
Hori
zon P
ointe
Rain
ier Vis
ta
Thornbury
Wonder
woo
d
Lakepoin
te
Tangle
wild
e
Wans
cher
sRAC
Nis
qually
Dik
e
Mer
idia
n Neighborh
ood
Lacey
Woodla
nd T
rail
Bro
oks
Lakepoin
te N
at. A
rea
Hom
ann
Woodla
nd Cre
ek
HP O
ff-Lea
sh
No. Piles
Park Size (Acres)
Results indicate that dog waste is present in significant quantities at many parks throughout the
Shellfish Protection Districts. Pet waste was most often observed in official and unofficial off-
leash areas, along trails, sidewalks, fence lines, and park access points (particularly forested).
Dog waste stations were well utilized, but their presence did not guarantee compliance.
Playgrounds and ball fields in well-populated parks were generally clean, especially large
facilities such as the RAC and Rainier Vista. Installation of dog waste stations, signage, and
continued outreach is highly recommended at select locations. Increasing the number of official
off-leash dog parks may also result in better management of dog waste.
The Scoop to Win campaign was partially funded by 2010 Shellfish Protection Funds approved
by the Henderson Inlet and Nisqually Reach SPD Committee, Thurston Conservation District,
and Thurston County Commissioners.
2.0 Background
In 2000, the Washington Department of Health (WDOH) downgraded 74 acres of commercial
shellfish beds in Nisqually Reach from conditionally approved to restricted because fecal
coliform bacteria levels failed to meet water quality standards. In 2001, the WDOH reclassified
240 acres in Henderson Inlet from approved to conditionally approved, a status which results in
automatic five-day closures of commercial shellfish beds after heavy rainfall events. These
actions led to the formation of the Henderson Inlet and Nisqually Reach Shellfish Protection
Districts (SPD) (Figure 1). A SPD Committee was formed, comprising 11 stakeholders who
make recommendations to address pollution sources from stormwater, septic systems, pet waste
and farm animals. The SPD Committee, Thurston Conservation District, and County
Commissioners approved a number of actions to improve water quality, which included outreach
and education, septic system repairs, and stormwater upgrades. The combined efforts of state
and local agencies, non-profit organizations and individual citizens, resulted in significant water
quality improvements. In 2010, the WDOH upgraded Henderson Inlet’s conditionally approved
status, lifting harvest restrictions.
As human population growth continues, it is more important than ever to maintain efforts to
protect water quality. To this end, Pacific Shellfish Institute (PSI) has performed outreach and
education related to bacterial pollution to citizens living in the Henderson and Nisqually Inlet
watersheds. The Scoop to Win campaign is one of several community events partially funded by
2010 Shellfish Protection Funds.
3.0 Survey Methods
Throughout the month of October, 2011, PSI conducted Scoop to Win, a pet waste education
campaign designed to educate citizens about the impact of dog waste on water quality in
urbanized environments. The goals of the campaign were to evaluate the presence and
distribution of dog waste, conduct outreach, identify problem areas, and create fun incentives for
citizens to clean up after their pets. To meet these goals, volunteers flagged individual poop
piles, weighed and removed feces, and distributed raffle tickets to responsible dog owners.
During the 1-month campaign, PSI performed outreach at 16 locations within the Henderson
Inlet and Nisqually SPDs. Site selection was based on recommendations by citizens, Lacey
Parks and Recreation maintenance staff, Stream Team employees and SPD committee members.
At each site, 1-2 individuals flagged and scooped dog poop piles for 1½-2 hours focusing
attention primarily on trails, sidewalks, tree bases, park perimeters and fence lines. Several
transects were performed across large fields, but these areas were typically not covered.
Information was recorded regarding presence of pet waste stations and stormwater features, dog
use, number and weight of poop piles collected, compliance rates, and other noteworthy
comments. Raffle tickets were distributed to individuals actively cleaning up after their pets, or
in possession of full poop bags. Two raffle tickets were offered to individuals claiming to, or in
the process of, cleaning up another owner’s dog poop. Educational outreach was performed
during each visit.
Figure 1. Map of Henderson Inlet SPD. Complete map of Lacey Parks and Facilities available
at: http://www.ci.lacey.wa.us/city-government/city-departments/parks-and-recreation/parks-and-facilities.
Map courtesy of Thurston County.
020406080
100120140160
Hori
zon P
ointe
Rain
ier Vis
ta
Thornbury
Wonder
woo
d
Lakepoin
te
Tangle
wild
e
Wans
cher
sRAC
Nis
qually
Dik
e
Mer
idia
n Neighborh
ood
Lacey
Woodla
nd T
rail
Bro
oks
Lakepoin
te N
at. A
rea
Hom
ann
Woodla
nd Cre
ek
HP O
ff-Lea
sh
No. Piles
Park Size (Acres)
4.0 Survey Results
In total, staff removed 1208 piles of dog poop totaling 127 pounds from 16 locations throughout
the SPDs (Figure 2). The number of poop piles ranged from 14 to 150 at Horizon Pointe Park
and the Hawks Prairie Off-Leash Park respectively. Park size represents the entire acreage of the
park and not the amount of ground surveyed. Because dog waste contains 23 million fecal
coliform bacteria per gram (Schueler 2000), its removal prevented 1,324,942,232,000 fecal
coliform units from potentially entering groundwater, stormdrains, waterways and ultimately
Puget Sound. This number is an approximate estimation since each pile varied significantly in
terms of light exposure and water content.
Figure 2. Comparison of dog feces collected at 16 locations within the Henderson Inlet and
Nisqually Reach SPDs.
Dog owners were observed cleaning up after their pets at 14/16 sites surveyed and it was
common to see owners carrying pet waste bags. Playgrounds and ball fields in well-populated
parks were generally clean, especially large facilities such as the RAC. Parks including Rainier
Vista and Hawks Prairie Off-Leash Park had particularly high compliance rates and individuals
expressed a high level of understanding regarding pet waste issues. The most frequent reasons
given for cleaning up after pets included 1) keeping parks clean for others, 2) preventing the
spread of pathogens to humans and other animals, and 3) preventing bacteria pollution in
waterways. One owner reported that dog waste is of particular concern because his dog has
become ill from ingesting feces left on the ground at parks.
On the contrary, owners were observed not cleaning up after their pets at 7/16 sites surveyed. In
some cases, pet waste posed a potential risk to water quality (Woodland Creek Community Park,
Nisqually Dike) and in others, it was more of a human health concern (Homann Park). In all
cases, pet waste was aesthetically displeasing. Pet waste was most often observed in official and
unofficial off-leash areas, along trails, sidewalks, fence lines, and park access points (particularly
forested). Reasons offered for not cleaning up included 1) it is natural and acts as fertilizer, 2) it
is not directly on the trail, and 3) it is gross. One individual commented that she did not clean up
because nobody else cleans up at that location.
Forty-five raffle tickets were distributed to individuals cleaning up after their pets. Nine
individuals were awarded prizes and offered the following responses to the question, “Why do
you clean up after your dog?”
"Because it's important and it’s disgusting to walk in a park full of poop.”
"I've stepped in other people's dog poop, and it really bothers me…it's inconsiderate."
"It's easy. If someone can't take the time to do it, I'll do it…I'm not going to just step over it.”
(non-dog owner)
"Dog poop is an environmental issue…if you own a dog, you need to be responsible and clean up
after it.”
“It keeps it nice for the people walking behind me.”
Individual Site Results (in order of ascending poop piles)
Site Name: Horizon Pointe Park
5700 Balustrade Blvd SE
Park Size: 9.5 acres
Date: 9/30/11
Time: 2:00-3:00
Participants: Aimee Christy (PSI), Bryan Johnson (KOMO 4 News)
Piles Scooped: 14
Total Weight: 2 lbs
Description: Horizon Pointe is a neighborhood park with features including sub-level soccer
fields, playground, picnic shelter, paved trails and sidewalks. Pet waste stations and garbage
cans are available. Drainage from the streets runs into large vegetative swales.
Compliance/Problem Areas: Poop piles were mostly found along the main sidewalk and
unpaved trail along the northern edge of the park. Several piles had been stepped on. All dog
owners were observed cleaning up after their dogs. Park maintenance staff noted that pet waste
can be a problem at this park at times.
Conclusions: The amount of dog waste was not significant during this site visit.
Site Name: Rainier Vista Community Park
5475 45th Avenue SE
Park Size: 46 acres
Date: 10/8/11
Time: 10:30-12:30
Participants: Aimee Christy (PSI)
Poop Piles Scooped: 20
Total Weight: 1 lb
Description: Rainier Vista is a well-utilized park with sub-level soccer fields, baseball fields,
tennis courts, volleyball, basketball, picnic shelters, a skate park, playground and network of
paved trails. The park is surrounded by neighborhoods on most sides and a large vacant field
with trails along the south edge. The vacant field was not surveyed. Ball fields are mostly
surrounded by vegetative swales. Stormwater ponds exist on the eastern portion of the park. Pet
waste stations and garbage cans are numerous.
Compliance/Problem Areas: One problem area was located along the paved trail and trees on
the southern edge of the park adjacent to the vacant field. This stretch of trail is mostly out-of-
view from a majority of park users. Many raffle tickets were distributed at this site and dog
owners seemed passionate about cleaning up after their pets.
Conclusions: Dog waste was not a problem during this site visit.
Site Name: Thornbury Park
5500 Thornbury Drive SE
Park Size: 9 acres
Date: 10/6/11
Time: 3:00-4:00
Participants: Aimee Christy (PSI)
Piles Scooped: 22
Total Weight: 2 lbs
Description: Thornbury is a neighborhood park that includes a grassy field, play equipment,
sidewalks and picnic shelter.
Compliance/Problem Areas: This site appeared clean. Most poop piles were detected along
the sidewalk on the west edge of the park. Dog owners seemed compliant.
Conclusions: Dog waste was not a significant problem during this visit.
Site Name: Wonderwood Park
5304 32nd Avenue SE
Park Size: 40 acres
Date: 10/7/11
Time: 12:30-2:00
Participants: Aimee Christy (PSI)
Piles Scooped: 30
Total Weight: 3.5 lbs
Description: Wonderwood Park is a mostly wooded park with paved and unpaved trails
winding throughout. The park includes features such as baseball fields, tennis courts, basketball
court, picnic shelters, and playgrounds. Pet waste stations and garbage cans are present.
Compliance/Problem Areas: This park is a popular destination for regular dog walkers.
Several individuals mentioned that people often park next to the baseball fields and let their dogs
defecate on the fields. No poop piles were found on the fields at this time. Heavy leaf litter
made detection difficult along the trails. Most poop piles were flagged near the parking lot on
32nd
Ave between the basketball court and tennis courts. Several compliant and one non-
compliant dog owner was observed.
Conclusions: Dog waste was not a significant problem during this visit.
Site Name: Lakepointe Park
6400 Compton Blvd SE
Park Size: 8 acres
Date: 9/30/11
Time: 3:30-4:30
Participants: Aimee Christy (PSI)
Piles Scooped: 36
Total Weight: 2.5 lbs
Description: Lakepointe is a neighborhood park with features including a soccer field, baseball
diamond, tennis court, playgrounds, paved trails and sidewalks. Pet waste stations and garbage
cans are available. Stormwater ponds are present. Fields are sub-level to accommodate runoff.
Compliance/Problem Areas: Poop piles were found primarily along paved trails and
sidewalks. The eastern corner of the park had the highest concentration of poop piles. Many
piles were also found on the slope of the western stormwater pond. All observed dog owners
were compliant.
Conclusions: Dog poop along sidewalks and paved trails suggests that individuals observe their
pets defecating and choose to not clean up. This neighborhood might be a good candidate for
further outreach efforts (see also Lakepointe Natural Area).
Site Name: Tanglewilde
414 Wildcat Street SE
Size: 9 acres (estimate)
Date: 10/28/11
Time: 12:30-2:15
Participants: Aimee Christy (PSI) & Katie Klaniecki (AmeriCorps-Water Resources
Assistant)
Poop Piles Scooped: 41
Total Weight: 6.5 lbs
Description: Tanglewilde is a neighborhood park with grassy fields, playground, tennis court
and adjacent community pool. The park is surrounded by single family homes on all sides. Pet
waste signage and garbage cans were present, but no pet waste station.
Compliance/Problem Areas: No problem
areas were detected. One compliant dog
walker was observed and had a strong
understanding of urban pet waste issues.
Conclusions: Dog waste was not a
problem during this visit.
Photo: Aimee Christy and Katie Klaniecki
next to sign that reads, “Dogs must be on a
leash at all times. Owners are responsible
for pet waste pick up.”
Site Name: Wanschers Community Park
2606 Hicks Lake Road SE
Park Size: 16 acres
Date: 10/7/11
Time: 2:15-3:30
Participants: Aimee Christy (PSI)
Piles Scooped: 48
Total Weight: 4 lbs
Description: This mostly forested park is located on the shores of Hicks Lake and includes
grassy play areas, picnic tables, trails, and fishing. Pet waste stations and garbage cans are
present.
Compliance/Problem Areas: Poop piles were dispersed lightly along the trails. Two problem
areas were identified: one approximately 25 feet northwest of the pet waste station and another
on a grassy slope adjacent to Hicks Lake. Two dog walking parties were observed – one was
noncompliant.
Conclusions: Pet waste was detected along banks of Hicks Lake. Increased park use during
warmer summer months may increase the amount of poop piles detected.
Photo: Thirteen flagged poop piles on slope
along Hicks Lake.
Site Name: Lacey Regional Athletic Complex (RAC)
8345 Steilacoom Road SE
Park Size: 100 acres – soccer fields and baseball diamonds were not surveyed
Date: 10/5/11
Time: 12:45-2:30
Participants: Aimee Christy (PSI)
Piles Scooped: 58
Total Weight: 4 lbs
Description: This large sports complex includes 6 soccer fields, baseball fields, picnic shelters,
3 playgrounds, paved and unpaved trails, and natural forested areas. Pet waste stations and
garbage cans are numerous.
Compliance/Problem Areas: A majority of the piles were found along a short, forested trail
connecting the RAC to a neighborhood along Steilacoom Road SE and 8th
Court SE. Pet waste
odor was detected along this segment. A cluster of 20 piles were found just beyond the goal of
Soccer Field #2. All observed dog owners were compliant.
Conclusions: Given the size of the complex, dog waste does not appear to be a problem at this
site.
Site Name: Nisqually Dike
10220 Martin Way E
Size: 1 acre based on .25 mile x 20 ft = 26,400 feet squared
Date: 10/14/11
Time: 10:30-11:45
Participants: Aimee Christy (PSI)
Poop Piles Scooped: 80
Total Weight: 7 lbs
Description: This site includes an unpaved trail spanning the length of a dike along McAllister
Creek that flows into the Nisqually Delta. The dike is bordered by I-5 and the Nisqually Plaza
RV Park to the north and two service stations, restaurant, and tavern to the south. The dike is
maintained by the Nisqually Plaza RV Park and equipped with a pet waste station, signage, and
garbage receptacle. Long grass and blackberry bushes line the edge of the trail with shrubs and
small trees along the banks of McAllister Creek.
Studies completed by the WDOH and the Nisqually tribe determined that McAllister Creek was
found to significantly influence water quality along the Nisqually Reach.
Compliance/Problem Areas: Despite the pet waste station, many piles of dog poop were
observed along the dike. Several piles were removed from the sloping banks of McAllister
Creek. The park owner expressed extreme frustration regarding the issue and reported that
compliance is a constant battle between him and his tenants. Several dog owners were observed
using the trail after eating at the nearby restaurant. The area is also used by dog owners
purchasing gas at the adjacent stations.
Conclusions: Pet waste is a water quality concern at this location due to the large volume of
feces in close proximity to McAllister Creek. Long grass may protect the waterway, but also
serves as an attractive place for dogs to defecate. Increased signage, distribution of fliers, native
plant enhancement, and additional outreach is recommended at this site.
Photos: Pet waste along McAllister Creek (left) and proximity of dike to nearby gas stations,
restaurant, and tavern (right).
Site Name: Meridian Neighborhood Park (William Ives Trail not surveyed)
8855 Campus Glen Drive NE
Size: 24 acres
Date: 10/22/11
Time: 10:00-12:00
Participants: Aimee Christy (PSI)
Poop Piles Scooped: 81
Total Weight: 16.5 lbs (lots of big dog poop)
Description: Meridian Park is a neighborhood park featuring a playground, paved and unpaved
trails, basketball court and large grassy field. In addition to the main parking lot, the park is
accessed by wooded trails from the east and south. Pet waste stations and garbage cans are
available at this site.
Compliance/Problem Areas: Most of the dog waste was detected around the perimeter of the
grassy field. The field is frequently used as an unofficial off-leash area for dogs. Poop piles in
this region were notably large in size. Pet waste was also observed in higher concentrations
along the wooded access trail from the east. Playground areas were clean. A group of dog
walkers expressed shock at the number of poop bags left abandoned on the edge of the paved
walking trails along Campus Glen Drive NE and Willamette Drive NE.
Conclusions: Dog waste found along wooded trails and perimeter of grassy fields suggests that
owners find it unnecessary to clean up their pet’s waste if it is in a “natural” environment. Urban
parks, however, attract high volumes of visitors that utilize both created and natural spaces.
Throughout the campaign, children, mushroom enthusiasts, birders, and dog walkers were
observed using these natural spaces both on and off-trail. This was typical at locations including
Meridian, Lakepointe Natural Area, Wonderwood, Woodland Creek, and Wanschers Park.
Site Name: Lacey Woodland Trail – Section between Homann Park and Woodland
Creek Park
Size: 5 acres based on 1 mile x 40 feet = 211,200 feet squared
Date: 10/21/11
Time: 12:00-2:00
Participants: Aimee Christy (PSI) & Katie Klaniecki (AmeriCorps-Water Resources
Assistant)
Poop Piles Scooped: 91
Total Weight: 10.5 lbs
Description: The Lacey Woodland Trail is an extension of the Olympia Woodland Trail and
runs west to east terminating at the Woodland Creek Community Park. No pet waste stations
were found on this segment of the trail. Signage and pet waste stations are located on the west
end of the Olympia Woodland Trail.
Compliance/Problem Areas: A majority of piles flagged were located near access points to
Woodland Creek Community Park and the apartment complex on the north edge of Homann.
Conclusions: Outreach provided to residents of the apartment complex near Homann Park and
surrounding neighborhood is recommended.
Site Name: Brooks Park
1313 College Street SE
Size: 1 acre
Date: 10/19/11
Time: 11:00-12:30
Participants: Aimee Christy (PSI)
Poop Piles Scooped: 107
Total Weight: 9 lbs
Description: Brooks is a small grassy park nestled
between single family homes to the north and south.
Backyards back up to the property, many
containing fences that open directly to the park.
Dogs were observed in several yards. No pet waste
station exists at this site.
Compliance/Problem Areas: Numerous piles
were flagged along the southern fence line both
near the parking lot and the access strip to the west.
Piles were also detected at the access point on the
northwest corner of the park. All dogs observed (3)
during the visit were off-leash. The garbage can did
not contain any properly disposed of pet waste
bags.
Photo: Flagged piles along the southern edge of
Brooks Park.
Conclusions: Brooks is one of the few Lacey
parks without a pet waste station. One to two stations should be installed near the parking lot
and western access point. Outreach to surrounding neighborhoods is also recommended. This
location has been suggested as a site for a future off-leash park. Conversion may improve the
amount of un-scooped dog waste via social pressure and site maintenance by organized dog-
advocacy groups.
Site Name: Lakepointe Natural Area – Private Property
Compton Blvd SE –eastern edge of development
Size: 20 acres (estimate)
Date: 10/26/11
Time: 1:20-3:20
Participants: Aimee Christy (PSI)
Poop Piles Scooped: 141 (not including dog composting pile - ~30 piles)
Total Weight: 20.5 lbs (not including dog composting pile - ~2 lbs)
Description: The Lakepointe Natural Area is a fenced parcel of forested land with a network of
unpaved trails and access to Pattison Lake. The fenced area is private property for use by
Lakepointe residents and guests only. It is bounded by AmTrak rail lines to the south, Pattison
Lake to the east, and single-family homes and condominiums to the northwest. No pet waste
stations or garbage cans exist at this site.
Compliance/Problem Areas: This site is commonly used as an unofficial off-leash park.
Large quantities of pet waste were found along the trail running parallel to the AmTrak rail lines.
No piles were seen along the shores of Pattison Lake. Additional problem areas were found in
clusters on the west side of the property along trails and under trees. One individual was seen
cleaning up after his dog and commented that he picks up when it is directly on the trails, but not
in the woods. Two non-compliant owners were observed. Pet waste composting was observed
at several locations. One pile of dog poop 1’ x 2’ x 2’ was uncovered equaling approximately 30
piles, or 2 pounds. Rabbit waste mixed with straw was spread around the bases of three trees.
Yard waste dumping and littering were also common at this site.
Conclusions: Installation of pet waste stations and garbage cans are recommended for this site.
While not an official park, this natural area is often used for recreation and dog walking. Similar
to other natural areas surveyed, the amount of flagged pet waste suggests that users are
comfortable with “dogs pooping in the woods” and do not see this as a concern. The high
number of stepped-on poop piles suggests that users do not remain on the trails at all times,
however, and are at risk of tracking feces into their cars and homes. Educational outreach
regarding pathogens found and transmitted by dog waste is recommended.
Photos: Rabbit composting around bases of several trees.
Site Name: Homann Park
1301 Carpenter Road SE
Park Size: 8 acres
Date: 10/12/11
Time: 12:30-3:45
Participants: Aimee Christy (PSI)
Poop Piles Scooped: 143
Total Weight: 13 lbs
Description: This neighborhood park is surrounded by an apartment complex and Lacey
Woodland Trail to the north, single family homes to the west and south, and commercial
development to the east. The park itself is at a lower elevation than the surrounding areas with
stormdrains providing drainage for both the park and surrounding neighborhood. The park
includes features such as a fenced baseball field, soccer field, running track and playground. Pet
waste stations, signage and garbage cans are available.
Compliance/Problem Areas: Large quantities of dog waste were found at this location. Three
main problem areas were detected along: 1) the fence line just east of the soccer field, 2) the
wooded access trail on the northwestern corner, and 3) the west edge of the property adjacent to
Glen Mary Lane SE. Many dog walkers were observed –most were compliant and two were not.
Several owners used the fenced baseball field as an off-leash area and did not clean up after their
dogs. One non-dog owner residing in the apartment complex north of the park informed me that
she scoops her yard frequently to protect her small children who often enter her home covered in
dog feces. After scooping the poop, she dumps it in the “thorny bushes” nearby. She has urged
her property manager to build a fence between the park access trail and her backyard to keep
dogs out. Staff from Lacey Parks Maintenance informed me that the current amount of dog
waste “is nothing compared to what it is during the summer when the park is more frequently
used.” Staff also expressed concern for the home school children that use the soccer field every
Friday from 9-1.
Conclusions: This park is a good candidate for increased outreach and possibly code
enforcement. An additional pet waste station should be placed at the wooded access trail on the
northwestern corner of the park. Fliers and additional information should be provided to the
apartment manager and neighborhood associations for distribution. One individual
recommended that Lacey Elementary be involved in the process in some fashion.
Photos: Scoop to Win flags marking approximately 40 poop piles along fence line.
Site Name: Woodland Creek Community Park
6729 Pacific Avenue SE
Park Size: 72 acres
Date: 9/30/11 and 10/1/11
Time: 12:00-1:30 and 12:00-2:00
Participants: Aimee Christy, Kristin Rasmussen (PSI), Bryan Johnson (KOMO
4 News)
Piles Scooped: 146 (Did not survey the northern half of the park by the lake and
playground or the south-eastern portion of the “natural area”)
Total Weight: 13 lbs
Description: Woodland Creek Park is a large park divided into two main sections: the northern
half contains large manicured lawns, picnic areas, paved sidewalks/trails, playground, and
natural vegetative buffers. The southern portion contains a foot bridge that crosses Woodland
Creek, grassy fields, and trails around the perimeter. The park is accessible at two locations
along the Lacey Woodland Trail. Pet waste stations, signage, and garbage cans are available.
Native vegetation and a constructed berm buffer the edge of Woodland Creek. Direct access to
the creek is possible at several narrow locations.
Compliance/Problem Areas: Woodland Creek has historically been used as an “unofficial”
off-leash park, as was the case during the site visit. Several owners were observed not cleaning
up after their pets. One individual believed that her dog had pooped in the “designated poop
area.” This area, approximately 20 feet south of the foot bridge on the west side of the main trail,
contained very high densities of dog waste in relatively close proximity to Woodland Creek.
Three piles were found directly on the edge of the creek. Many piles were dispersed throughout
the native vegetation plantings and tall grass in this southwest portion of the park. Another
problem area was located northeast of the footbridge among the grasses and shrubs. Many
properly-disposed-of poop bags were found in the garbage cans.
Conclusions: The high volume of dog waste found at this park may pose a risk in terms of
human health and water quality. Improvements have been made (i.e. pet waste stations, garbage
cans, tall grass, native plant restoration, berm construction) to reduce the amount of fecal
coliform entering the creek. Code enforcement is recommended.
Photo: Poop piles adjacent to Woodland
Creek. Constructed berm depicted in
background.
Site Name: Hawk’s Prairie Off-Leash Park
Park Size: 5 acres
Date: 9/29/11
Time: 12:00-4:00
Participants: Aimee Christy (PSI), John Dodge, Tony (The Olympian), Ann
Marie Finan (Thurston County Stream Team)
Piles Scooped: 150
Total Weight: 12 lbs
Description: Hawk’s Prairie Off-Leash Park is a well utilized facility with a high volume of
dogs. The park is completely fenced and equipped with numerous pet waste stations and garbage
cans. The park is divided into two sections: one for large dogs and one for small. A 1/3 mile
loop trail spans the park perimeter. A separate fenced playground is located on the eastern edge
of the property. The site is mostly short lawn, dirt, sand, and gravel. It is not located adjacent to
water bodies and appears to have grassy vegetative swales around portions of the property.
Compliance/Problem Areas: Many owners were observed cleaning up after their pets and
several claimed to pick up other dog’s poop as well. A sign at the entrance kiosk encourages
individuals to clean up any poop that they see since “we all miss a few.” Social distraction
resulting from the fun, interactive nature of the park may account for the high number of poop
piles flagged. The fence line along the far eastern edge of the property had the highest density of
piles.
Conclusions: Despite the high number of piles flagged, off-leash dog parks may be beneficial in
terms of dog waste pollution. Properly sited off-leash parks contain high volumes of dogs in a
safe, contained, controlled environment. Cleaning up after pets is the “social norm” at off-leash
parks and this behavior is often enforced by other dog owners. Organized dog advocacy groups
can also assist with site maintenance and outreach.
Photo: Flagged piles along the eastern edge of the fence line
at Hawk’s Prairie Off-Leash Park.
5.0 Recommendations
Based on Scoop to Win surveys, the following actions are recommended.
1. Install pet waste stations, signage and garbage cans at Brooks Park, Lakepointe Natural
Area, and the northwest corner of Homann Park.
2. Conduct outreach to neighborhoods and schools in the vicinity of Homann Park and
Woodland Creek.
3. Increase code enforcement at Homann Park and Woodland Creek
4. Distribute fliers, increase signage and perform native plant enhancement along the
Nisqually Dike.
5. Increase the number of properly-sited off-leash parks throughout the watersheds.
6.0 Conclusions
Dog waste has been identified as a source of fecal coliform in shellfish growing areas throughout
urbanized watersheds nationwide (Kelsey et al. 2003, 2004; Mallin et al. 2001; VanDolah et al.
2000, Weiskel et al. 1996; White et al. 2000). Studies performed in the Henderson Inlet
watershed found that dog waste, while not the only source, was a significant pollution source in
Woodland Creek, a more urbanized tributary (TCPH 2002a, TCPH 2002b).
Scoop to Win data supports these studies in that the surveys detected significant quantities of dog
waste at various locations within the more urbanized portions of the Henderson Inlet and
Nisqually Reach SPDs. The direct impact of pet waste on water quality or human health cannot
be determined from this data. However, the results clearly indicate that dog feces are
concentrated at specific locations throughout the watershed and that many dog owners are not
cleaning up after their pets.
Promoting responsible behavior change through outreach and education is important, but does
not always result in compliance. Reducing barriers, providing incentives and enforcing codes do
not always change behavior. According to a Chesapeake Bay survey, 44% of dog walkers who
do not clean up after their dogs indicated they would still refuse to pick up, even if confronted by
complaints from neighbors, threatened with fines, or provided with convenient options for
retrieving and disposing of waste (Swann 1999). Therefore, in addition to source control, actions
must also be taken to prevent bacteria sources from entering waterways.
Infiltration of stormwater in the form of stormwater ponds, rain gardens, and vegetated swales is
critical, as well as stringent protection of wetlands and buffers. Together, educational outreach,
code enforcement and responsible development will help reduce bacterial pollution into Puget
Sound.
6.0 Acknowledgements
The Scoop to Win campaign was funded through 2010 Shellfish Protection Funds approved by
the Henderson Inlet and Nisqually Reach SPD Committee, Thurston Conservation District, and
Thurston County Commissioners.
A special thanks to Scoop to Win sponsors (Bark Avenue, Just Keep Swimming, Boston Harbor
Marina, SoundHounds, PetSmart, Pacific Shellfish Grower’s Association and the Henderson
Inlet Community Shellfish Farm), Lacey Parks and Recreation Department and maintenance
staff, Stream Team, Katie Klaniecki, and the many responsible dog owners. Thanks for
scooping!
7.0 References
Kelsey, H., G. Scott, D. E. Porter, B. Thompson and L. Webster. 2003. Using Multiple
Antibiotic Resistance and Land Use Characteristics to Determine Sources of Fecal Coliform
Bacterial Pollution. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 81(1-3):337-348.
Kelsey, H., D. E. Porter, G. Scott, M. Neet and D. White. 2004. Using Geographic Information
Systems and Regression Analysis to Evaluate Relationships Between Land Use and Fecal
Coliform Bacterial Pollution. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 298(2):197-
209.
Mallin, M. A., S. H. Ensign, M. R. McIver, G. C. Shank and P. K. Fowler. 2001. Demographic,
Landscape, and Meteorological Factors Controlling the Microbial Pollution of Coastal Waters.
Hydrobiologia. 460:185-193.
Schueler, T. R. 2000. Microbes and Urban Watersheds: Concentrations, Sources, and Pathways.
In: The Practice of Watershed Protection. T. R. Schueler and H. K. Holland, eds. Center for
Watershed Protection. Ellicott City, Maryland. pp. 74-84.
(http://www.polytechnic.edu.na/Schools/civil/Libraries/Hydrology/17-
Microbes%20in%20Urban%20Watersheds.pdf)
Swann, C. 1999. A Survey of Residential Nutrient Behaviors in the Chesapeake Bay. Widener
Burrows, Inc. Chesapeake Research Consortium. Center for Watershed Protection. Ellicott City,
MD. 112. pp.
(TCPHa) Thurston County Public Health. 2002. Bacteriological Contamination Source
Identification – Henderson Inlet 1999-2001. Final Report. Prepared in conjunction with Dr.
Mansour Samadpour, University of Washington.
(TCPHb) Thurston County Public Health. 2002. Henderson Inlet Watershed Implementation
Program. Final Project Report. Authors: Davis, S., Hansen, C. and L. Hofstad.
Van Dolah, R. F, D. E. Chestnut and G. I. Scott, eds. 2000. A Baseline Assessment of
Environmental and Biological Conditions in Broad Creek and the Okatee River, Beaufort
County, South Carolina. Prepared by South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental
Control, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, and National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service. Final Report to the Beaufort County
Council. Beaufort County, South Carolina. 115 pp. (available at
http://www.scdhec.gov/eqc/water/html/broadokateerp/title.html)
Weiskel, P., Howes, B. and G. Heufelder. 1996. Coliform Contamination of a Coastal
Embayment: Sources and Transport Pathways. Environmental Science and Technology.
30(6):1872-1881.
White, N. M., D. E. Line, J. D. Potts, W. Kirby-Smith, B. Doll and W. F. Hunt. 2000. Jump Run
Creek Shellfish Restoration Project. Journal of Shellfish Research. 19(1):473-476.
top related