rural development department performance review 2011-2012

Post on 15-Jan-2016

22 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Rural Development Department Performance Review 2011-2012. Key Result Area #1: Customers. Area 1.1 Design and Deliver Learning Program. Area 1.1 Design and Deliver Learning Program. Area 1.1 Design and Deliver Learning Program. Area 1.2 Strengthen Partnerships with Private Sector. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Rural Development DepartmentRural Development DepartmentPerformance Review Performance Review

2011-20122011-2012

Key Result Area #1: Customers

Area 1.1 Design and Deliver Learning Program

2011 2012KRI 1.1.1 Total Learning Activities 15 9

a. Training Courses 12 7

a.1 Core Courses 2 3

a.2. Customized Courses 10 4

b. Seminars and Workshops 1 0

c. Structured Learning Visits 2 2

d. Forum/Conferences/Meetings 0 0

Area 1.1 Design and Deliver Learning Program

2011 2012KRI 1.1.2 Total Participants 294 195

Area 1.1 Design and Deliver Learning Program

2011 2012KRI 1.1.3 Application of Skills and Knowledge

a. Action plans

- Effective Facilitation and Com Skills 87% (13:15)

- Actively Shaping Rural Development through LRED (Phase I) 62% (15:24)

- Postharvest 96% (24:25)

- Agriculture VC 21% (6:28)

KRI 1.1.4 Participant Satisfaction

a. Overall rating 4.46 4.23

Area 1.2 Strengthen Partnerships with Private Sector

2011 2012KRI 1.2.1 Partnership with private sector and quasi-governmental organizations% of participants from private and

quasi-governmental orgsa. Government 231 (79%) 180 (92%)

b. Private 63 (21%) 15 (8%)KRI 1.2.2 No. of private organizations in joint-activities with MI

1 5

(Betagro)(Betagro, CM

Fresh Milk, Raming Tea, CP,

Sriviroj)

Area 1.3 Enhance Local Partners’ Abilities in Delivering MI Programs

2011 2012KRI 1.3.1 No. of local partners co-designing and implementing RDP activities

2 6(Betagro+SHDP) (YC+NAFRI)

KRI 1.3.2 Local partners’ satisfaction on MI TA

No means of verification

No means of verification

KRI 1.3.3 No. of MI activity localized and delivered in local language3 3

(PM&E, SLV-Rice VC, SLV-Regional RD

Planning)

(FMMP, SLV Farming System,

SLV cabbage)

Area 1.4 Policy Research and Recommendations

2011 2012KRI 1.4.1 No. of research conducted by in-house researchers

2 1

(Cabbage+CF) (Cross-border CF along NSEC)

KRI 1.4.2 No. of policy dialogue/forum organized

0 0

KRI 1.4.3 No. of participants in dialogues0 0

KRI 1.4.3 No. of policy briefs submitted to decision-makers1 0

Cross-Border Contract Farming in Lao PDR: An

Institutional Choice under Constraints

Area 1.5 Consultancy Services

2011 2012KRI 1.5.1 No. of consultancy services commissioned by clients

0 1(FMMP)

KRI 1.5.2 Clients’ satisfaction

N/A No means of verification

Area 1.6 In-country Program

2011 2012KRI 1.6.1 No. of MI programs conducted off-MI headquarters

2 3

(PM&E, IWRM #6) (FMMP, IWRM #7, SLV Cabbage)

Key Result Area #2: Process and Growth

2011 2012KRI 2.1.1 No. of active strategic alliances 9 6

(ADB, GIZ, MRC, NZAP, Israel, Singapore, TICA,

DIC, SHDP)

(NZAP, ADB, MRC, SDC, TICA, NAFRI)

a. Regional partners 4 4

b. National partners 5 2(Singapore, Israel, TICA, DIC, SHDP) (TICA, NAFRI)

KRI 2.1.2 No. of project activities conducted in collaboration with national and regional partners

15 9 (+ 6)

Area 2.1 Create Strategic Alliance with Regional and National Partners

2011 2012KRI 2.2.1 No. of CLMV and China professional staff representation against Thais

5:2 3:3

a. CLMV and China Van, Ouee, Sopheak, Somountha, KV

Ouee, KV, Chanroat

b. Thais Nue, NIkhom Nue, Nikhom, Aryuwath

No. of non-GMS against GMS staff 2:7 1:6

a. Non-GMS Tess, Bill Tess

b. GMS As above As above

KRI 2.2.2 No. of in-house experts/ trainers 1 2

KRI 2.2.5 No. of associate consultants or visiting faculty 0 0

Area 2.2 Enhance MI Human Resource Capacity

Key Result Area #3: Finance

Key Result Area #3: Finance

Area 3.2 GMS Contribution

2011 2012KRI 3.2.2 No. of MI activities funded/ partially funded by GMS countries

2 1(PH, AVC) (GAP)

KRI 3.2.3 % of participants of MI core programs sponsored/ partially sponsored by GMS countries

2% 1.5%

a. Partial scholarship (3+3) 3

a. Total participants 294 195

Area 3.3 Multi-year Funded Program

2011 2012KRI 3.3.1 No. of multi-year funded programs (activities?) Ratio of multi-year funded programs vis one-off programs

0:15 3:9

a. Multi-year funded programs 0 3(GAP, YC, SLV

cabbage)

b. One-off programs 15 9 KRI 3.3.3 No. of donors for multi-

year programs 0 1

(NZAP)

Thank youThank you

Q & AQ & A

RD Specific Projects

Table RD PR. 1Transnational Agricultural Value Chains and

Promotion on Economic Corridors (2011-2013)

2011 20121. Regional training courses 1 -

2. Workshops - -

3. No. of participants 28 -

4. Research - -

5. Collaborating Partners TICASingapore

6. Funding 70,000

Table RD PR. 2Postharvest Management System: Sharing

Experiences and Best Practices of Israel and Thailand (2011-2013)

2011 20121. Training courses 1 0

a. General modular training 1 0

b. TOT - 0

2. Research - -

3. Participants (exp 75) 25 0

4. Collaborating Partners TICAIsrael-Embassy

6. Funding ?? 0

Table RD PR. 3GMS Youth Camp on Transnational Production Chain

(2011-2015)

2011 20121. Youth Camp 1 1

2. Participants (exp 150) 22 40

3. Local Partner Beneficiaries5 Colleges in

Laos and Vietnam

4 Universities in CLMV

4. Collaborating Partners Betagro

Betagro, CP, Chiangmai

Fresh Milk, Raming Tea,

Sriviroj

6. Funding ?? 0

top related