radpeer™ hani abujudeh md, mba, fsir associate professor of radiology massachusetts general...

Post on 16-Dec-2015

224 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

RADPEER™

Hani Abujudeh MD, MBA, FSIRAssociate Professor of RadiologyMassachusetts General Hospital

Harvard Medical school

Disclosures

Book Royalties

RADPEER™

RADPEER™ is a simple tool developed to allow physicians to do peer review during the course of a day’s work.

When a new study is interpreted with an prior study for comparison, a peer review of the accuracy of the interpretation of the previous examination occurs.

4

RADPEER™

Piloted RADPEER™ in 2001

Offered to members in 2002

e RADPEER ™ developed in 2005

Scoring changes implemented in 2009

6

Signal events

American Medical Accreditation Program by the AMA in 1998 The publication of the, Institute of Medicine report To Err Is Human in

March 2000.

An ABMS task force on the maintenance of certification, Competence Initiatives: A Status Report

  Listed four components of maintenance of certification, which will be

required by all specialty boards

These components are professional standing, commitment to lifelong learning and periodic self-assessment, cognitive expertise, and the evaluation of performance in practice.

7

ACR RADPEER

In response to the interests of the public and the health care community, the ACR convened a patient safety task force.

The task force concluded that to meet the fourth requirement of maintenance of certification

a successful peer review program must be national, uniform in structure and function across practices, accurate, facile, nonpunitive, and able to be integrated into a facility’s quality assurance program.

The task force concluded that no existing programs met these criteria

9

RADPEER ™Four point scoring system:

1. Concur with interpretation

2. Discrepancy in Interpretation/not ordinarily expected to be made (understandable miss)

a. unlikely to be clinically significant b. likely to be clinically significant

3. Discrepancy in Interpretation/ should be made most of the time a. unlikely to be clinically significant b. likely to be clinically significant

4. Discrepancy in Interpretation/ should be made almost every time - misinterpretation of finding a. unlikely to be clinically significant b. likely to be clinically significant

Scores of 2b, 3 or 4 should be reviewed through the facility’s internal QA process prior to submission to ACR

10

12

14

The median number of cases reviewed in RADPEER is 776 each year, which translates into 3 to 4 cases reviewed per working day.

The RADPEER system is not designed to be a sole OPPE measure, but it can be incorporated into such programs. The committee discourages the use of scores as a means of competency assessment and encourages the maintenance of the nonpunitive nature and anonymity in scoring.

RADPEER could be expanded and used as a means to

collect data on other aspects of quality and safety in radiology.

Improving the performance of the system as a whole is far more beneficial than eliminating the outliers (Deming, W.E., Out of the Crisis2000, cambridge: MIT Press.) ( assessing competence vs improving performance)

16

RADPEER™

April 2014

Over 1,170 participating groups

Over 17,500 physicians

17

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

FY 2005 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 Fy 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

RADPEER Growth

18

RADPEER™

19

RADPEER™

Data submitted to ACR via website

Reports for individuals and group available electronically

ABR MOC Reports

20

21

22

RADPEER™ as a PQI Project

Radiologists can select RADPEER™ to be used as one of their projects for Maintenance of Certification for the ABR (American Board of Radiology)

The MOC process includes:

Evidence of professional standing (license) Lifelong learning and self-assessment (SAMs, CME) Cognitive expertise (exam) Practice quality improvement

(PQI project such as RADPEER™)

23

24

Cost of RADPEER™ Participation

Annual fee for participation in RADPEER™ is based on the number of physicians in the group

# Physicians Annual Fee

2-5 $8006-15 $1,500

16-25 $2,20026-35 $3,00036-45 $3,80046-55 $4,60056-65 $5,40066-75 $6,20076-85 $7,00086-95 $7,800

96-105 $8,600106-115 $9,400116-125 $10,200

25

https://radpeer.acr.org

habujudeh@partners.org

top related