qualityteacher

Need of Quality indicators in Teacher Need of Quality indicators in Teacher Education ProgrammesEducation Programmes

Dr.K.Nachimuthu Dr.K.Nachimuthu

Asst. Professor, Asst. Professor, Dept. of Education, Dept. of Education, Periyar University, Salem, TNPeriyar University, Salem, TN dr_knmuthu@yahoo.com

www. drknmuthu.comwww. drknmuthu.com

INTRODUCTION

The word “quality” comes from the Latin word “quails” which means, “what kind of”.

The British Standard Institution (1991) defines, as “the totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy stated or implied needs.

DIFFERENT QUALITIES

Quality has different ideas.

(i) quality as absolute ( eg. Taj Mahal Pic);

(ii) quality as relative (eg. IIT standards);

(iii) quality as a process (eg. HP printer);

(iv) quality as culture (eg. teaching process in Gnanamani Institutions).

QUALITY - TEACHER EDUCATION

• To identify the needs of our schools (Classroom, Infrastructure, Buildings, Playground, Electricity, Water facilities),

• To identify the needs of our teachers and the teacher educators (teaching degree, skill of teaching, using technological devices)

• To evolve a framework to provide a systematic recording tool for documentation of their quality development (Hostel, library, Internet)

NAAC CONCENTRATES ON -

(i) Impact on students; (ii) Improving performance; (iii) Policy importance; (iv) Susceptibility to being influenced by the school system and other agencies; (v) Scientific soundness; (vi) Face validity and Content validity and (vii) Feasibility of any educational institution.

OBJECTIVES OF NAAC

• Grade institutions of teacher (higher) education and their programmes

• Stimulate the academic environment and quality of teaching and research in these institutions

• Help institutions realize their academic objectives• Promote necessary changes, innovations and

reforms in all aspects of the institutions working for the above purpose; and

• Encourage innovations, self- evaluation and accountability in teacher (higher) education

QUALITY OF TEACHING PROGRAMMES

• Accountability• Attractiveness of image• Brand maintenance• Competition• Improve responsibilities• Parents satisfaction• Standard maintenance

QUALITY ASSESSMENT

We can check the (a) physical Infrastructures (building & equipments); (b) system efficiency (students); and (c) faculty recruitment (teach & non-teaching staff) through the five point quality scale with the rating of needs must attention, can do more; good; better and best levels.

CONLCUSION

Today's students live in a global, knowledge-based age.

They deserve teachers whose practice embraces the best that technology can bring to learning.

Critical thinking, problem solving and decision-making as cognitive skills that children should be adept at.

Preparing teachers & giving the learner better opportunities to create new knowledge

(M)+91 09 84 27 26 987

www.drknmuthu.com

Thank you Teachers