qcd corrections to the dilepton production near partonic threshold in pp and ppbar collisions

Post on 14-Jan-2016

35 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

QCD corrections to the dilepton production near partonic threshold in pp and ppbar collisions. H. Shimizu (Hiroshima U, KEK) G. Sterman (SUNY) W. Vogelsang (BNL, RBRC) H. Yokoya (Niigata U). ref. Phys.Rev.D71,114007,2005 (hep-ph/0503270). J-PARC Workshop @ KEK, JAPAN Nov.30- Dec.2, 2005. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

QCD corrections to the dilepton production near partonic threshold in pp and ppbar collisions

• H. Shimizu (Hiroshima U, KEK)

• G. Sterman (SUNY)

• W. Vogelsang (BNL, RBRC)

• H. Yokoya (Niigata U)

J-PARC Workshop @ KEK, JAPAN Nov.30- Dec.2, 2005

ref. Phys.Rev.D71,114007,2005 (hep-ph/0503270)

Introduction

Drell-Yan process :

: parton distribution functions

: partonic cross section ← perturbatively calculable

• Asymmetry (Ratio)

Target (beam) polarization :single spin asymmetry → twist-3, intrinsic-kT

double spin asymmetry → twist-2 pol. PDFs

Nuclear dependence : → nuclear effects

• Cross section

: qT-distribution → (hard) gluon radiations

: mass distribution

: rapidity distribution

see next talk by H.Kawamura

→ x1,x2 distributions

→ simplest and basic

Observables

Measurements of DY at J-PARC (GSI) gives :

• new information of the PDFs :flavor structure, nuclear effects,

polarized PDFs,,,

• precise confirmation of the pQCD predictions :

scaling violation (i.e. evolution),

qT-distribution, absolute cross section,,,

• indication of the NP corrections (power-suppressed, ISI,,) :

ambiguity of PT, renormalon,,,

OPE cannot be applied to DY process

In this talk, I would examine a phenomenology of

the pQCD corrections to the DY X-sec.

order (how large?),

convergency and ambiguity

(fixed order calculation, threshold resummation,,)

• Keypoints :

• Factorization Theorem

Drell-Yan cross section formula

Status of DY higher order calculations

LO

LO : Drell,Yan (’70)

virtual : real:

LO NLO

Altarelli,Ellis,Martinelli(’78,’79);Kubar-Andre’,Paige(’79);Harada,Kaneko,Sakai(’79)

LO :

NLO :

Drell,Yan (’70)

qg :

Status of DY higher order calculations

LO NLO

Altarelli,Ellis,Martinelli(’78,’79);Kubar-Andre’,Paige(’79);Harada,Kaneko,Sakai(’79)

LO :

NLO :

Drell,Yan (’70)

Status of DY higher order calculations

Hamberg,van Neerven,Matsuura(’91,’02);Harlander, Kilgore(’02)Anastasiou,Dixon,Melnikov,Petriello(Rapidity,’04);

LO :

NLO :

NNLO :

LO NNLONLO

Status of DY higher order calculations

Altarelli,Ellis,Martinelli(’78,’79);Kubar-Andre’,Paige(’79);Harada,Kaneko,Sakai(’79)

Drell,Yan (’70)

LO :

NLO :

NNLO :

Status of DY higher order calculations

Status of DY higher order calculations

K-factor

NLO/LO

NNLO/LO

Large corrections come from the partonic threshold region (z~1)

real emission suppressed by the phase space restriction

imbalance occurs between real and virtual gluon corrections

→ only soft gluon can be emitted

→ soft gluon (eikonal) approximation

to treat these logs up to all orders

(after the cancellation of IR pole)

Threshold logs

Threshold resummation

Sterman(’87);Catani,Trentadue(’89)

• General Formula : Sudakov Exponent

• First, goto Mellin-moment space :

threshold log →

LL : NLL :

NNLL :

• NNLL : Moch,Vermaseren,Vogt(’04)

Threshold resummation

3-loop split. func. gives

Catani,Mangano,Nason,Trentadue(’96)• employ “Minimal Prescription” :

define the inverse Mellin contour as the left of the Landau pole

may not complete : NNLO PDFs (we use GRV(NLO)), precise determination of at NNLO

• collinear improvement : Kramer,Laenen,Spira(‘98),,,

universal collinear (non-soft) gluon →

Threshold resummation

LL : NLL :

NNLL :

Threshold resummation

LL : NLL :

NNLL :

not only the convergency of resummation accuracy (NnLL), but also the convergency of the power expansion of Sudakov exponent to

Convergency

note : “Minimal Prescription” defined so that PT has no factorial growth

power corr. should be added later if required phenomenologicaly

LL :

NLL+NLO :

NNLL+NNLO :

Matching to fixed order calc.

relevant for all phase space regions

qg sub-process contributions

Renormalization scale ambiguity

f.o.

resum.

Factorization scale ambiguity

f.o.

resum.

Summary

① pQCD corrections to DY process are given for the J-PARC energy

K= 3~10, good convergency, scale ambiguities are reduced

② Resummation is a powerful tool to know the insight of pQCD

corrections at very higher order, and also the structure of

factorizable hadronic interaction

③ Resummation also as a tool to find the hint of non-pert. effects

(analytically and/or phenomenologically),

and the connection between pert. and non-pert. regime

Collinear improvement

Taking into account the universal collinear (non-soft) gluon radiation

Kramer,Laenen,Spira(‘98);Catani,de Florian,Grazzini(‘02); Kulesza,Sterman,Vogelsang(’02,’04)

• numerically sizable effects

• correctly re-produce the terms to all orders

• re-cover the full evolution kernel by

• re-arrange the exponent

Collinear improvement

Kramer,Laenen,Spira(‘98);Catani,de Florian,Grazzini(‘02); Kulesza,Sterman,Vogelsang(’02,’04)

1st order expansion ⇔ NLO

2nd order expansion ⇔ NNLO

soft-gluon resummation formula includes far infra-red region, where the perturbative treatment of QCD may not be justified.

may be replaced by non-perturbative approach, power suppressed correction, etc

Apply a explicit cut-off to avoid the double counting between pert. and non-pert.

we don’t know the NP pert yet, however, tentatively

it tells “ how much the far-IR region is

involved? ”

Far infra-red cut-off

Far infra-red cut-off

Far infra-red cut-off

Data in the past

McGaughey,Moss,Peng(’99)

Data consistent with NLO !

CERN-NA3,FNAL-E605,E772

FNAL-E772 (’90)

DATA / NLO ~ 0.641

W.J.Stirling,M.R.Whalley (’93)

FNAL-E772 (’90)

DATA consistent with LO (!?)

KNNLL = 3 ~ 5

CERN-WA39 experiment (‘80)

Drell-Yan dimuon production by π-Tungsten scattering

GRV π-PDF, isospin symmetry and no nuclear effects

NLL reproduce data best

Spin asymmetry

Model of Transverse PDFs → upper limit of Soffer’s inequality with GRV&GRSV

e.g.

GRV98(NLO)

Parton intensity :

Matching to fixed order calc.

note : differences only come from the parton intensity

PDF rescaling : effective resummation scheme

Resummed Cross Section with NLO PDFs

→ possible double counting of higher-order enhancement between

partonic CS and PDF

PDF rescaling : effective resummation scheme

Sterman,Vogelsang(’99)

top related