problems with c3 photosynthesis - · pdf fileproblems with c3 photosynthesis increase in...

Problems with C3 photosynthesis

Increase in photorespiration - in hot dry conditions

Why? - Competition between O2 and CO2 for Rubisco binding site

[O2] / [CO2] inside the leaf increases

Photorespiration increases when

Photosynthetic PathwayVariation

• Focus until now has been on C3photosynthesis

• Variation in biochemistry of photosynthesisexists and has ecological implications –CAM and C4 photosynthesis

Biochemistry worked on by Hatch and Slack 1966

C4 and CAM are two evolutionary solutions to the problem of maintaining photosynthesis with stomata partially or completely closed on hot, dry days

(Carbon Concentrating Adaptations)

Photosynthetic PathwayVariation

• C3 – CO2 fixation by Rubisco; PGA (phosphoglycerate –a 3 carbon sugar) is the product of initial carboxylation

• C4 – CO2 fixation by PEP carboxylase to produce OAA(oxaloacetate – a 4 carbon acid); C4 then transportedwithin the leaf, decarboxylation and re-fixation byRubisco.

• CAM (crassulacean acid metabolism) – CO2 fixation byPEP carboxylase to OAA, but results in the production ofmalic acid in the vacuole during the day and de-carboxylation and fixation at night

C3, C4 and CAM

• C4 photosynthesis results in CO2concentrating at the site of carboxylation,by a spatial specialization of biochemistry– Kranz Anatomy

(Bundle Sheath Design)

• CAM photosynthesis results in CO2concentration at the site of carboxylationby a temporal specialization ofbiochemistry

Comparison of leaf anatomy of C3 and C4 plants. Reproduced through the courtesy of Dr. Stephen Grace, University of Arkansas.

www.plantphys.net/ article.php?ch=e&id=290

Anatomicaldifferences betweenC3 and C4 plants

www.plantphys.net/ article.php?ch=e&id=290

Figure 2 Diagrams of Kranz anatomy in a C4 dicot and a C4 grass. (A) In the C4 dicot Atriplex rosea (NAD-ME), the bundle sheath cells form only a partial sheath around the vascular tissue. Only the radially arranged mesophyll cells that are in contact with the bundle sheath express PEPCase. (B) In the C4 grass Panicum capillare (NAD-ME), the large vascular bundles are surrounded by both a non-photosynthetic bundle sheath (mestome sheath) and the photosynthetic bundle sheath.

www.unlv.edu/.../ Anatomy/Leaves/Leaves.html

Corn leaf cross-section

Anatomy of C4 plants

Kranz Anatomy (Bundle Sheath Design)

Bundle sheath

Mesophyll

(1) Carboxylation of PEP (by PEP Carboxylase) produces C4 acids in the mesophyll cells

(2) Organic acids are transported to the bundle sheath cells

(3) Organic acids are decarboxylated in bundle sheath cellsproducing CO2

(4) CO2 is assimilated by Rubisco and PCR cycle

(5) Compounds return to the mesophyll cells to regenerate more PEP

Central Steps in C4 photosynthesis

CO2 CO2

C4

CO2

Mesophyll

CO2 concentration 100 µmol mol-1

C3

PEP

C4

Bundle Sheath

CO2 concentration 2000µmol mol-1

PCR

(Calvin Cycle)

C3

CHO

PEP Carboxylase

C4 plants have a mechanism to enhance the partialpressure of CO2 at the site of Rubisco - so that oxygenationreaction of Rubisco is virtually inhibited

Rubisco

Three subtypes of C4 photosynthesis (!)

Based on the enzyme involved in the decarboxylation of the C4compounds transported to the vascular bundle sheath

http://www.steve.gb.com/science/photosynthesis_and_respiration.html

Compensation points for C3 and C4 differ

The Compensation Point

Net Assimilation = gross photosynthesis - respiration

CAM

Bromeliaceae

Cactaceae

Generally in Succulent Plants

The first recognition of the nocturnal acidification process(CAM)can be traced to the Romans, who noted that certain succulent plants taste more bitter in the morning than in the evening.

(Rowley, 1978)

CAM photosynthesis results in CO2 concentration at the site of carboxylation

by a temporal specialization of biochemistry

The above diagram compares C4 and CAM photosynthesis. Both adaptations are characterized by initial fixation of CO2 into an organic acid such as malate followed by transfer of the CO2 to the Calvin cycle. In C4 plants, such as sugarcane, these two steps are separated spatially; the two steps take place in two cell types. In CAM plants, such as pineapple, the two steps are separated temporally (time); carbon fixation into malate occurs at night, and the Calvin cycle functions during the day. Both C4 and CAM are two evolutionary solutions to the problem of maintaining photosynthesis with stomata partially or completely closed on hot, dry days. However, it should be noted, that in all plants, the Calvin cycle is used to make sugar from carbon dioxide.

C4 CAM

ComparingC4 and CAM photosynthesis

CAM PHOTOSYNTHESIS

CO2 Fixation = by BOTH PEP carboxylase and RUBISCO

Functional consequences of C4and CAM

• Light-use efficiency• Water-use efficiency• Nitrogen-use efficiency

Leaf

Pho

tosy

nthe

tic ra

teLight-use efficiency

• C4 higherLight-useefficiency whenphotorespirationnegligible

Light-use efficiency

• C3 temperaturedependent

• C4 less than C3whenphotorespirationnegligible

Water-use efficiencyRecall

A/E = (Ca – Ci) / (1.6*Dw)

C4 and CAM photosynthesischange the demand function ofphotosynthetic activity (increaseCO2 flux)

Secondarily, reductions in E occur from

(1) Reductions in stomatal conductance(2) Temporal dynamics of stomatal behavior

Consequences – • C3 plants – 1 gram biomass per 650-800 grams water transpired• C4 plants – 1 gram biomass per 250-350 grams water transpired• CAM plants – 1 gram biomass per 100-200 grams water transpired

Nitrogen-use efficiency• Rubisco in C3 plants represents up to 30% of

total leaf N (and sometimes up to 50%)

• C4 plants have 3 to 6 times less Rubisco thanC3 plants resulting in a smaller N requirementin leaves (120-180 mmol N m-2 and 200-260mmol N m-2 respectively)

• CAM is more variable in N requirements andinvestments…but succulence is such a differentmorphological characteristic

Evolutionary Pressures leadingto C4 and CAM

• Seems logical that selection for increasedwater-use efficiency and/or nitrogen-useefficiency would be the main selectivepressures

C4 Photosynthesishas evolvedindependently many times . . .

Evolution of the C4 Syndrome is a recent event in the history of plants

-Only found within the Angiosperms- mainly in the monocots but also within several Eudicot families- not found in trees

- First evolved 12.5 million years ago

Evolution of C3 - Atmospheric [CO2] was much greater But with the success of plants [CO2] decreased

and [O2] increased

-> conditions that increase photorespiration

-> Favoring adaptations that increase CO2 concentrating adaptations

Factors favoring C4 evolution

• Low CO2 concentrations (low CO2/O2)– Starting around 40 million years ago– Increased photorespiration in C3 plants

• Secondarily– Higher day temperatures– Limited water

Water use efficiency is regarded as main selectivetrait favoring evolution of C4 over C3 photosynthesisin hot, dry conditions (with low [CO2] relative to [O2])

Other hypotheses• Herbivory hypothesis

– C4 plants are less nutritious than C3 plants(less N,P, CHO per gram leaf)

– C4 herbivores seem to be ‘specialized’

– Could a C4 syndrome be an escape fromherbivory?

C3-C4 intermediates

• In several groups, there are biochemicaland morphological intermediates

• Represent and evolutionary transition?• Useful tool in understanding performance

of transition states

- Found in 6 families across Monocots and Eudicots

Intermediates appear to have evolved multiple times

Flaveria linearis

CAM Evolution- Evolved from C3 plants BEFORE evolution of C4 plants - since middle Tertiary 20-30mya (aquatic species)

- Phylogenetically diverse

- Found in 2x as many families than C4

Lycophyte, Pterophyta, Gnetophyta, Angiosperms

-Selection to overcome CO2 limitations during the day-Selection favoring maximizing carbon assimilation

Some CAM plants grow in deep shade

- Usually associated with succulence

- CAM is also found in aquatic vascular plants where it presumably enhances inorganic carbon acquisition in certain aquatic environments where CO2 availability can become rate limiting for photosynthesis

Cactus, Iceplant, Stonecrop, EuphorbsBromeliads, Orchids

- 6% of terrestrial and aquatic flora is CAM

- Unlike C4

Examples of CAM plants at very high elevations 4700m (!)

-Presence of CAM declines when night time temps are high

Many tropical forest epiphytes

Variable photosyntheticstrategies

Iceplant (Aizoaceae)

Mesembryanthemum sp.

• Mesembryanthemum crystallinum– C3 during high leaf water content but

induction of CAM during drying– Result - Maintenance of photosynthetic rate

throughout the year

http://www.vernalpools.org/

http://ceres.ca.gov/wetlands/whats_new/vernal_sjq.html

Vernal Pools: Example of diversity of photosynthetic strategies

Jon Keeley –California Vernal Pools

• Quillwort – Isoetes howelii – CAM, but switches to C3 when not submerged

• Quillworts – I. howelii & I. orcuttii – use channels in roots to enhance CO2 uptake (from submegred soils)

• Aquatic grass – Orcuttia californica – uses C4, with submerged and aerial leaves

• Aquatic plant – Eleocharis acicularis – Grass, uses C4 whensubmerged, shifts to C3 when exposed to the atmosphere

All in a very localized plant community!Strategies likely evolved independently

ISOETACEAELycophyta

Photosynthetic Distributions

• Associated with changes in selectivepressures on water-use and nutrient useefficiency

C4 species are more dominant in hot, dry, nitrogen limiting environments

Questions

-Outline the similarities between C3, C4, and CAM photosynthesis

-Outline the differences between C3, C4, and CAM photosynthesis

-What selective pressures lead to C4 and CAM pathways?

-Why aren’t all plants C4 or CAM?

-What is PEP carboxylase?