performance of cmaq for inorganic aerosol compounds in greater tokyo

Post on 12-Jan-2016

28 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Performance of CMAQ for Inorganic Aerosol Compounds in Greater Tokyo. Hiroshi HAYAMI Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry and Tatsuya SAKURAI Tokyo University of Science. Acknowledgements. National Institute of Environmental Studies Shinji Kobayashi and Shinji Wakamatsu - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

CRIEPI

Performance of CMAQ forInorganic Aerosol Compounds in

Greater Tokyo

Hiroshi HAYAMICentral Research Institute of Electric Power Industry

and

Tatsuya SAKURAITokyo University of Science

CRIEPI

Acknowledgements National Institute of Environmental Studies

Shinji Kobayashi and Shinji Wakamatsu Japan Clean Air Program of Petroleum Energy Center

Tazuko Morikawa Institute of Behavioral Sciences

Akiyoshi Kan-nari and Tsuyoshi Baba Fujitsu FIP Corp.

Noritaka Furuhashi, Izumi Ikeuchi and Hisashi Tashiro

CRIEPI

Aerosol pollution in G.Tokyo PM mass averages

SPM* by beta gauge ~ 40 µg m-3

>40 % stations violated the standard in the 1990s

PM2.5 by TEOM ~ 25-30 µg m-3 > US std. high in early summer and early winter

Composition of SPM carbon(EC/OC) ~ 30 % inorganic species ~ 30 %

*SPM: PM with 100% cut at 10 µm ~ PM7

CRIEPI

Our studies with CMAQ for G.T.

budget of ammonia long-term (one year)

episodes of inorganic aerosols 2 to 3 days in summer and winter

presented by Sakurai in poster session

presented from now

CRIEPI

D0(East Asia)

@45 km

D1(C. Japan)

@15 km

D2(G. Tokyo)

@5 km

MM5 MM5 MM5

CMAQ CMAQ

Study Domains for SIA in G.T.

two-wayno interaction

initial and boundary conditions

CRIEPI

Model Options & Configurations MM5 V3.6-1

35 layers; ~25 m in the lowest layer FDDA with JMA’s RANAL (20km, 12hrs.) Grell, MRF, simple ice, multi-layer soil

CMAQ 4.2.2 (MCIP 2.1) 16 layers; identical to MM5 in PBL CB4-AE3-AQ solved with MEBI CMAQ dry and RADM-cloud wet dep. ACESS for E.Asia and NIES/JCAP for GT

CRIEPI

Emission inventory (NIES/JCAP)

SOx [ton day-1] NOx [ton day-1] condensed dust [ton day-1]

CRIEPI

CMAQ vs. field campaignsWINTER

Dec. 9 to 10, 1999

SUMMER

Jul.31 to Aug.1,2001

T,RH,WS,WD Tokyo, Kumagaya, Tateyama

NO2, SO2, O3 Fukaya, YokosukaTokyo(Komae)

Kumagaya

NMHC composition Fukaya ―

particulate

NO3-, NH4

+, SO42-

Fukaya, YokosukaTokyo(Komae)

Kumagaya

gaseous HNO3, NH3 ―Tokyo(Komae)

Kumagaya

CRIEPI

Winter: at FukayaAerosol (FP)Gas

NO

2 [p

pb]

SO

2 [p

pb]

O3

[ppb

]

Dec. 9 Dec. 10

obs.CMAQ

Y

F

0 6 12 18 0 6 12 18 00

20

40

60

0

5

10

15

20

0

5

10

15

20

0 6 12 18 0 6 12 18 00

20

40

60N

O3- [

µg

m-3]

NH

4+ [µ

g m

-3]

0 6 12 18 0 6 12 180

5

10

15

20

0 6 12 18 0 6 12 180

5

10

15

20

0 6 12 18 0 6 12 180

5

10

15

20

Dec. 9 Dec. 10

obs.CMAQ

SO

42- [µ

g m

-3]

CRIEPI

Winter: at YokosukaAerosol (FP)Gas

Dec. 9 Dec. 10

Y

F

Dec. 9 Dec. 10

0 6 12 18 0 6 12 180

5

10

15

20

0 6 12 18 0 6 12 180

5

10

15

20

0 6 12 18 0 6 12 180

5

10

15

20

0 6 12 18 0 6 12 18 00

20

40

60

0

5

10

15

20

0

5

10

15

20

0 6 12 18 0 6 12 18 00

20

40

60

obs.CMAQ

obs.CMAQ

NO

3- [µ

g m

-3]

SO

42- [µ

g m

-3]

NH

4+ [µ

g m

-3]

NO

2 [p

pb]

SO

2 [p

pb]

O3

[ppb

]

CRIEPI

Winter contour: PM [µg m-3]

not good “observed” SPM(~PM7) vs. “calculated” PM2.5

SPM = SIA + EC + OC + Cl- +…

observed CMAQ observed CMAQ

18:00 Dec. 9, 1999 18:00 Dec. 10, 1999

PM2.5 in CMAQ

CRIEPI

TKSummer: Gas at Tokyo

0 6 12 18 0 6 12 18 00

20

40

60

0 6 12 18 0 6 12 18 00

5

10

15

20

0 6 12 18 0 6 12 18 00

20

40

60

80

100

120

NO

2 [p

pb]

SO

2 [p

pb]

O3

[ppb

]

Jul. 31 Aug. 1

obs.CMAQ

better than winter

CRIEPI

0

10

20

30

0

10

20

30

0

10

20

30

0

10

20

30

0

10

20

30

Summer: SIA at Tokyo

NO3- [µg m-3]

part

icul

ate

gase

ous

0 12 0 12 0 0 12 0 12 0

0 12 0 12 0

NH4+[µg m-3] SO4

2-[µg m-3]

obs.CMAQ

TK

Jul. 31 Aug. 1 Jul. 31 Aug. 1

Jul. 31 Aug. 1

CRIEPI

Summer contour: PM

much better than winter summer SPM mainly made of SIA

observed CMAQ observed CMAQ

12:00 Jul. 31, 2001 12:00 Aug. 1, 2001

CRIEPI

Summary

CMAQ is fine secondary > primary products summer > winter

to improve the performance… Cl- and SOA (winter) better boundary concentrations (SO2 & SO4

2-)alter the gas-aerosol partitioning of NO3

- and NH4+

CRIEPI

under testing CMAQ with... HCl/Cl-, important in winter aerosol

emission, deposition and gas-aerosol reaction coarse aerosol nitrate and chloride

gas/coarse aerosol reaction upper boundary

free-tropospheric ozone sulfate formation on aerosol surface

heterogeneous reaction of SO2

CRIEPI

SO2-to-SO42-(p) conversion

homogeneous + nucleation SO2 + OH => H2SO4(g) H2SO4(g) => SO4

2-(p) aqueous chemistry in cloud water

SO2 + cw => SO42-(aq)

SO42-(aq) => SO4

2-(p) heterogeneous chemistry

SO2 + aerosol surface => SO42-(p)

top related