otsm-triz as a response to the request from the specialized … · 2015-11-22 · 2010. 3. 11-12...
Post on 14-Apr-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
OTSM-TRIZ as a Response to the Request from the Specialized and Interdisciplinary Problem Situationsfrom the Specialized and Interdisciplinary Problem Situations
Nikolai Khomenko,Nikolai Khomenko,
Hongyul Yoon
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
Nikolai Khomenko
TRIZ Master Certified by Genrich AltshullerDeveloped OTSM with Genrich AltshullerDeveloping OTSM further and moreDeveloping OTSM further and more
Insight Technologies Lab, Canada
< ik l i kh k @ il >< nikolai.khomenko@gmail.com >
H l YHongyul Yoon
TRIZ Specialist (#63) certified by MATRIZ,OTSM Professional (#1) certified by Nikolai KhomenkoOTSM Professional (#1) certified by Nikolai Khomenko
TRIZ Center, South Korea
< hongyul@trizcenter co kr >< hongyul@trizcenter.co.kr >
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
Main Thinking Models and Tools of OTSMg
OTSM : General Theory of Powerful ThinkingOTSM was originated by G. Altshuller.Current research of OTSM has been done mainly by Nikolai Khomenko
• 8 Axioms ( with 3 postulates of Classical TRIZ )
Current research of OTSM has been done mainly by Nikolai Khomenko.
• ‘ENV model ‘ Including ‘Advanced Multi Screen Thinking’
• 4 Technologies with all of classical TRIZ tools :
ENV model Including Advanced Multi Screen Thinking• Hill Model, Tongs Model, and Funnel Model
Typical, Contradiction, Problem Flow and New Problem Technologies
• Problem Flow Networks Approach
2
Including Networks of Problems, Contradictions and Parameters
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
Purposes of PFNp
• Problem Flow Networks Approach
3
Including Networks of Problems, Contradictions and Parameters
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
Are we happy with tools of Classical TRIZ ?ppy* The below explanation is from Valeri Souchkov’s ‘TRIZ Success Cases’
4
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
Are we happy with tools of Classical TRIZ ?ppy
Classical TRIZ tools for idea generation are productive when the
How to reduce the deformation of the glass substrate during transportation ?
target objects are simple and obvious.
How to reduce the deformation of the glass substrate during transportation ?
40 Principles ?
d dInventive Standards ?
Pointers to Effects ?
5
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
Are we happy with tools of Classical TRIZ ?ppy
On the other hand, if the target object is a complex system, classical
How to improve the brightness of this OLED displayer ?
g jTRIZ tools for idea generation don’t seem to be applicable.
40 Principles ?
How to improve the brightness of this OLED displayer ?
40 Principles ?
Inventive Standards ?
Pointers to Effects ?
6
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
A classification of problems for TRIZ applicabilityp pp y
It was proposed that we could classify problems into simple andIt was proposed that we could classify problems into simple and complex ones ‘based on our experience’
One of complex problemswhich seem to need some transformation
One of simple problemswhich could be directly dealt
for direct application of TRIZ toolswith classical TRIZ tools
7
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
Two main streams of development of classical TRIZp
G. Altshuller developed the classical TRIZ in two main streams.One is a set of idea generation tools for inventive problem solvingOne is a set of idea generation tools for inventive problem solving.The other is a thinking process for solving a problem which could becomplex.
System Evolution Trends & Laws Idea Generation Tools 40 Principles
Inventive Standards
for the Problems That SeemsSimple Non-typical Problems to SolversBut Can Be Reformulated to Typical Ones
Pointers to EffectsBut Can Be Reformulated to Typical Onesfrom TRIZ Viewpoint
……
ARIZ
A Problem Solving Processfor a Highly-nontypical Problem Model
8
Which Might Be Complex
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
Two main streams of development of classical TRIZ
From historical viewpoint, idea generation tools of TRIZ had been introduced to improve the practical efficiency of ARIZ
p
ARIZP bl S l i P
introduced to improve the practical efficiency of ARIZ
ARIZ – 56 • • • • • • • • ARIZ – 85CProblem Solving Process
Trends of Engineering System Evolution
40 Principles Idea Generation Tools for a Certain Problem Model
8 Laws of
Inventive Standards Pointers to Effects
System Evolution Divided in 3 Categories
9
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
How to deal with a complex problem in ARIZ-85Cp p
ARIZ – 85C Problem Solving Process
Initial NonInitial Non--Typical Problem ModelTypical Problem ModelInitial NonInitial Non--Typical Problem ModelTypical Problem Model
1st Problem Transformation (Part 1)1st Problem Transformation (Part 1)
2 d P bl T f ti (P t 2 3)2 d P bl T f ti (P t 2 3)
6.2. checking the problem formulation for combination of several problems
2nd Problem Transformation (Part 2,3)2nd Problem Transformation (Part 2,3)
3rd Problem Transformation (Part 4,5)3rd Problem Transformation (Part 4,5)
6.3. changing the problem
6.4. reformulation of the mini-problem
Change "Initial Problem" (Part 6)Change "Initial Problem" (Part 6)Change "Initial Problem" (Part 6)Change "Initial Problem" (Part 6)
10
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
Complexity beyond coverage of ARIZp y y g
How to improve How to improve pthe efficiency of a power plant
pthe yield of a semiconductor plant
11
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
Limit of modern ways to deal with complex problemsy p p
How to prioritize a lot of problems ?How to prioritize a lot of problems ?How to prioritize a lot of problems ?How to deal with a lot of contradictions ?
How to manage new resultant problems ?
How to prioritize a lot of problems ?How to deal with a lot of contradictions ?
Value (Cost) Analysis
problems ?
Parametric Analysis
St t l A l i
Component AnalysisInitial ComplexInitial Complex A Set of A Set of
Si l blSi l bl
Classical TRIZ tools
New ProblemsNew ProblemsResultantResultant
New ProblemsNew Problems
Function Analysis
Root Cause Analysis
Structural AnalysisInitial ComplexInitial ComplexProblem SituationProblem Situation Simple ProblemsSimple Problems for Solution Idea
Generation
New ProblemsNew Problems
Root Cause Analysis
……
12
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
OTSM viewpoints proposed by Nikolai Khomenkop p p y
How to prioritize a lot of problems ?How to prioritize a lot of problems ?How to manage new resultant problems ?How to manage new resultant problems ?
A complex problematic situation isNOT a set composed of individual NOT a set composed of individual problems,problems,BUT a network of problems accordingBUT a network of problems accordingBUT a network of problems according BUT a network of problems according to their relationshipto their relationshipfrom ENV viewpoint of OTSM
Nikolai Nikolai KhomenkoKhomenko
A complex problematic situation is
How to deal with a lot of contradictions ?How to deal with a lot of contradictions ?
A complex problematic situation isNOT a set composed of individual NOT a set composed of individual contradictions,contradictions,BUT a network of contradictionsBUT a network of contradictions according according to their relationshipto their relationship
13
to their relationshipto their relationshipfrom ENV viewpoint of OTSM
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
Problem Flow Networks Approach of OTSMpp
Like ARIZ in Classical TRIZ, Problem Flow Networks Approach of OTSM provides the process to narrow down the solution searching zoneprovides the process to narrow down the solution searching zone
Initial problem situation description 1. Convergence of ‘Partial
Conceptual Solutions’ into ‘Final Conceptual Solution’ Description of a
Building ‘Network of Problems’ and obtaining ‘Partial Conceptual Solutions’
Collecting ‘Partial Conceptual Solutions’
Final Conceptual Solution ready to be a prototype or implementation
2. Evaluation of ‘Final Conceptual Solution’
Description of a Satisfactory Conceptual Solution’
4 main technologies of OTSM
Choosing ‘Bottleneck problems’ by analyzing ‘Network of Problems’ and building ‘Network of Contradictions’
p
can be used at each step of ‘Problem Flow Networks’ approach
Analyzing ‘Network of Contradictions’ and transformation of it into ‘Network
f P t ’
Dynamic summary of knowledge obtained from ‘Problem Flow Networks’ approach for solution evaluation
Final s mmar of kno ledge obtained from ‘Problem Flo Net orks’of Parameters’
Transformation of ‘Network of Parameters’ (Specific)
Final summary of knowledge obtained from ‘Problem Flow Networks’ approach for use of future demands
0. Reflection1. Knowledge Management2 Forecasting
14
into ‘General Network of Parameters’ relevant to the problem situation
2. Forecasting3. Product Development4. Competitive Analysis of Patent/ Other Intellectual Property
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
Networks of Problems, Contradictions and Parameters,
Each network provides systematic guides to deep understanding the core of the problems
Network of Problems Network of Contradictions Network of Parameters
core of the problems
Systematic selectionof
bottleneck problems
Systematic selectionof
Systematic selectionof
root physical contradictionspmain technical contradictions root physical contradictions
15
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
Overview of systematic selection at each stage y g
Network of Problems Network of Contradictions Network of Parameters
El tEl t P tP t•• BottlenecksBottlenecks •• ElementsElementswhich are mostly related which are mostly related to contradictionsto contradictions
•• ParametersParameterswhich are mostly responsible which are mostly responsible for other parametersfor other parameters
Partial Solutions Partial Solutions Partial Solutions
Narrowing Research AreaWithout Losing Quality of the Satisfactory SolutionNarrowing Research Area without Losing Quality of the Satisfactory Solution
16
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
Summaryy
• Idea generation tools of Classical TRIZ are not ready to apply to complex problems and need some additional analytical tools in order to manage complex problematic situation efficiently and effectively . To narrow research area without loosing quality of the solutions , we need a systematic way to integrate all partial solutions to every subproblem.
• Like ARIZ in Classical TRIZ, a general thinking approach is needed to transformthe complex problem situation into a system of key problems and prioritize themfor effective solving processfor effective solving process.
• Unlikely to other modern analytic ways in TRIZ field,the problem flow networks approach (PFN) of OTSM suggests systematic way to reduce the solution searching area and deepen the understanding the core of the problem situation.
17
2010. 3. 11-12 Korea TRIZCON 2010 : Nikolai Khomenko & Hongyul Yoon
Reference
Publications in the International Scientific Journals with peer reviewing:1. N.Khomenko, R. De Guio, L. Lelait, I.Kaikov. ‘A Framework for OTSM-TRIZ Based Computer Support to be used in Complex ProblemManagement’, International Journal of Computer Application in Technology (IJCAT). Volume 30 issue 1/2 - 2007.g p pp gy ( )
2. Nikolai Khomenko, Roland De Guio, and Denis Cavallucc, ‘Enhancing ECN’s abilities to address inventive strategies using OTSM-TRIZ’, Int. J. Collaborative Engineering, Vol. 1, Nos. 1/2, 2009. Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
3. Alexander Sokol, David Oget, Michel Sonntag, Nikolai Khomenko, ‘The development of inventive thinking skills in the upper secondary language classroom ’, Thinking Skills and Creativity (TSC). Volume 3. Issue 1. 2008. Pages 34-46.
Other publications:4. N. Khomenko, R. De Guio, ‘OTSM Network of Problems for representing and analysing problem situations with computer support ’, Trends in Computer Aided Innovation. Edited by Noel Leon-Rovira, Su K. Cho. Springer 2007, ISBN:978-0-387-75455-0. ISSN: 1571-5736 (Print) p y , p g , ( )1861-2288 (Online)p.77-88
5. Paul R. Rousseau, and Nikolai Khomenko, ‘Improving Problem Solving and Solution Design Skills Using Problem Flow Coaches in Capstone Projects ’, Proceedings of the conference - The Sixth International Conference on Innovation and Practices in Engineering Design and Engineering Education. July 27-29, 2009.
6. Atom Mirakyan, Laurent Lelait, Nikolai Khomenko, Igor Kaikov, ‘Methodological Framework for the analysis and development of a sustainable, integrated, regional energy plan – A French region case study ’, Proceedings of the conference EcoMod2009, Ottawa, Canada, June 24-26, 2009
7. Atom Mirakyan, Nikolai Khomenko, Laurent Lelait, Igor Kaikov, ‘The potential of OTSM and Classical TRIZ as a framework method for modern regional, integrated energy planning and modelling ’, Proceedings of Fifth TRIZ Symposium in Japan. September 10-12, 2009
8. N. Khomenko, I.Kaikov and E.Shenk, ‘OTSM-TRIZ PROBLEM NETWORK TECHNIQUE: APPLICATION TO THE HISTORY OF GERMAN HIGH-SPEED TRAINS ’, Proceedings of the conference ETRIA TRIZ-Future 2006,Kortrjik, Belgium, November 6-8, 2006
18
9. N. Khomenko, M. Ashtiany, ‘Classical TRIZ and OTSM as a scientific theoretical background for non-typical problem solving instruments ’,Proceedings of the conference ETRIA TRIZ-Future 2007, Frankfurt, Germany November 6-8, 2007.
top related