osimo crossover-undp

Post on 21-Oct-2014

1.094 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Presentation at webinar at http://europeandcis.undp.org/

TRANSCRIPT

UNDP WEBINAR, MARCH 22ND 2012David Osimo, Tech4i2.comwww.crossover-eu.net #pm20

Policy Making 2.0How can technology enhance

policy making?

WHAT IS POLICY-MAKING 2.0

TOOLS Open data Social networks and

crowdsourcing Visualisation Simulation and modeling Serious gaming

VALUES Open up to external

contributions earlier in the process

Enable peer-to-peer collaboration between participants

Design for unexpected questions/contributions (Raw data, open questions)

Be very clear and usable when you ask for help

Account for real humans not simplified abstract entities

Brainstorming solutions

Drafting proposals Revising

proposalsOpen Discussion

Induce behavioural change

Collaborative action

Ensure Buy-in

Monitor executionCollect

feedback

Identify problems

Collect evidence

Set priorities

Anallyze data

Forum, blogs, twitter

Uservoice, ideascale

Etherpad

Co-ment.com

Social networks

Persuasive technologies

Challenge.gov

Open data

Participatry sensing

Open Data visualization

Evidencechallenge.com

Collaborative

visualization

Google moderator

Policy cycle

Policy tasks

Policy tools

AGENDA SETTING: THE CASE OF IDEARIO FOR CAGLIARI

Tool: idea-storm

POLICY-DESIGN: COMMENTNEELIE.EU

Tool: commentable

document

POLICY IMPLEMENTATION: CHALLENGE.GOV

Tool: crowdsourcing

platform

POLICY EVALUATION: FARMSUBSIDY.ORG

Tool: open data

8

VIEWS FROM THE FIELD “There are more smart people outside government than within it”

(Bill Joy) “the coolest thing to do with your data will be thought of by

someone else” (Rufus Pollock) “A problem shared is a problem halved ...and a pressure group

created” (Paul Hodgkin – PatientOpinion.com) “it’s about pressure points, chinks in the armour where

improvements might be possible, whether with the consent of government or not” (Tom Steinberg, Mysociety.org)

“many participants in the process dilute the effect of bad apples or unconstructive participants” (Beth Noveck, Peertopatent.org)

Source: IPTS estimation based on Eurostat, IPSOS-MORI, Forrester

IT’S NOT ABOUT “TOTAL CITIZENSHIP”

10

WE SHOULD DESIGN GOV 2.0 FOR BART, NOT ONLY FOR LISA

Hat tip: Carter and Dance, Nytimes.com

HOW TO DO IT: INNOVATION WITHOUT PERMISSION Attract and build internal competences Ask for help in the Open Source community Copy and use ready-made tools Valorize risk-taking internally Not completely bottom-up: a design approach Permanent beta, continuous strive for usability

Start experimenting!

YOUR QUESTIONS?Further information: Visit www.crossover-project.eu Post questions/needs on http://crossover.uservoice.com

Share experiences on the Policy-Making 2.0 group on

Linkedin

http://egov20.wordpress.com @osimodDavid.osimo@tech4i2.com

top related