organics recycling at ohio state | us epa archive document · endorsement or recommendation by epa....

EPA Disclaimer Notice: This document has been provided as part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Sustainable Materials Management Web Academy (formally RCC) Recycling and Solid Waste Management Educational Series. This document does not constitute EPA policy or guidance and should not be interpreted as providing regulatory interpretations. Inclusion within this document of trade names, company names, products, technologies and approaches does not constitute or imply endorsement or recommendation by EPA. Information contained within this document from non-EPA presenters has not been screened or verified. Therefore, EPA has not confirmed the accuracy or legal adequacy of any information provided by the non-EPA presenters and used by EPA on this web site. Finally, links to non-EPA websites are provided for the convenience of the user; reference to these sites does not imply any official EPA endorsement of the opinions, ideas, data or products presented at those locations nor does it guarantee the accuracy of the information provided.

ORGANICS RECYCLING AT OHIO STATE Corey Hawkey | Sustainability Coordinator, Energy Services and Sustainability January 2012

3

what to expect

INTRODUCTION

PROGRAM OVERVIEWS

LESSONS LEARNED CONCLUSION

PROJECT IDEAS

Brutus Buckeye sorting recycling

introduction

4

GOAL Divert 40% of Ohio State’s materials from landfills

program overview

5

TOTAL TRASH 12,148 tons down 6% compared to 2004 baseline

program overview

6

RECYCLING 3,862 tons up 53% since 2004

where it all started

7

where it all started

8

introduction

9

SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Co-mingle recycling Zero waste efforts Organic collection pilots

program overview

10

OHIO UNION Built in pulping units (3)

program overview

11

program overview

12

by the numbers

13

• Installation costs / low maintenance • Managed by Dock Manager

140 tons

avoided 24 mt co2e

32 tons

avoided 12 mt co2e

87 tons

lessons learned

14

• Great way to receive LEED points for new construction • Toters are good – not best • If you can reduce collection frequency – it’s worth it

program overview

15

ZERO WASTE EVENT SERVICE Available upon request

program overview

16

program overview

17

by the numbers

18

• Sustainability events • Student Life • Wexner Arts • Department meetings • Women’s reception

6275 people

8 events

96% average diversion

lessons learned

19

• Can be challenging logistically • There is excitement around the program • A lot of education is required • Some events are just not appropriate

e.g. very large events • Easy to establish in buildings already collecting organic materials • Critical to have appropriate compostable/recycling

program overview

20

ORGANIC RECYCLING PILOTS Blackwell Hotel Fawcett Center Faculty Club

program overview

21

BLACKWELL

by the numbers

22

4.5 tons per week

$120 per week collection

80-85%

diversion

lessons learned

23

• Reduced hauling costs • Reduced rodents, flies, and odor • Presently, a little messy • Additional labor • Need a leader/champion/advocate • Trash liner savings

program overview

24

OTHER FACILITIES Faculty Club Fawcett Center

by the numbers

25

34.04 tons to Quasar (biodigestor) avoided 40 MT CO2e 19.37 tons to Compost facilities

reduced 7.5 MT CO2e

lessons learned

26

• Time/labor intensive • Determining if outside hauler is better • Helps support economy of scale for organic recycling in the community

27

program overview

using compostable & recyclable products.

created zero waste stations. installed signage

DIRTY COMPOST

CONCESSIONS

CONCESSIONS

SUITES

SUITES

KITCHEN

KITCHEN

RECYCLING

SORT

day of game

DIRTY COMPOST

BOWL

BOWL

BARRELS

BARRELS

CLUB

CLUB

RECYCLING

SORT

day after game

compost. 1.64 average tons of compost | .59 average tons of food donation per game

recycling. average 8.3 tons per game

http://go.osu.edu/zerowaste

by the numbers

36

avoided 1.6 MTCO2e

82.4% highest

diversion

2.5 highest

food diversion 2.1

lowest trash

3.3 avg trash

8.3 avg

recycling

1.8 avg

compost

75.2% avg diversion

75 Zero Waste

team members

10-15 student

volunteers

1200 concession

people

reduced .5 MTCO2e

lessons learned

37

• Listen, organize, and plan • Coordinate partners • Seek leadership approval • Keep it simple • Focus on the needs

conclusions

38

• Identify your partners (compost facility) • Start with pilot program • It’s A LOT of work!

39

questions

Thank you! Hawkey.13@osu.edu | @OSUrecycles