on-the-fly synthesis of multi-clock sva
Post on 31-Jan-2016
67 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
On-the-fly Synthesis of Multi-Clock SVA
Jiang Long
Andrew Seawright
Paparao Kavalipati
IWLS’ 2008
2
Outline
Introduction— Background and scope— Related works
Synthesizing multi-clock SVA— Single clock assertion compilation— Compile through rewriting— On-the-fly synthesis algorithm
Proof of correctness
Experimental results and conclusions
3
Formal Model for Multi-Clock Designs
Clock
Specification
RTL
Design
SVA
Assertions
4
Multi-Clock Modeling
0
1
clk0_posedge
data_in1
@posedge clk0
data_in1
mclk
5
Objective
Synthesize SVA into Checker logic— Generic checker logic
Utilize existing FV framework/technique/optimization Utilize existing multi-clock network
— Optimize checker logic size Number of sequentials and gates
— Validation Proof of correctness
6
SVA Abstract Grammar – Unclocked Sequence
Sequences define language of words
Booleans b
Concatenation R1 ##1 R2
Or R1 or R2
Repetition R1 [*0:$]
Fusion R1 ##0 R2
Intersect R1 intersect R2
Local Variable b, v=e
7
SVA Abstract Grammar – Clocked Sequence
Grammar for clocked sequence S
S ::= @(clk) R
| ( S ##1 S)
Single clock @clk R
Multi-clock @clk1 R1 ##1 @clk2 R2
8
SVA Abstract Grammar - Property
Properties evaluate true/false over words
Regular expression R
Implication R |-> P
R |=> P
Or P1 or P2
And P1 and P1
Not not P
9
SVA Abstract Grammar - Property
Properties evaluate true/false over finite words
Implication R |-> P
R |=> P
10
SVA Multi-Clock Assertions
11
SVA Multi-Clock Assertions
12
SVA Multi-Clock Assertions
13
SVA Multi-Clock Assertions
14
SVA Multi-Clock Assertions
15
Synthesis of regular expression + “actions”— Seawright / Brewer - synthesis of controllers
Synthesis of SVA— Pellauer / Lis / Baltus / Nikhil - using Blue Spec
Checkers in Formal Verification— Beer / Ben-David / Landver: on-fly-model checking of RCTL
Synthesis of SVA Local Variables— Long/Seawright
Multi-Clock assertion synthesis for verification— Ganai, et al.
Annotating OVL 2.0 with SVA — Long, Seawright, et al.
Related Work
16
Contribution
Synthesize SVA into Checker logic— Adapt single-clock SVA compilation procedure— Generic checker logic
Utilize existing FV framework/technique/optimization Utilize existing multi-clock network
— Optimized checker logic size— Validation
Proof of correctness based on SVA semantics
17
Outline
Introduction— Background and scope— Related works
Synthesizing Multi-clock SVA— Single clock assertion compilation— Compile through semantic rewriting
Penalty: Double the checker logic size— On-the-fly synthesis algorithm
No penalty Proof of correctness
Experimental results and conclusions
18
SVA compilation
Prop
Bool
R
|=>
term [*2:M]
gnt
req1
##1
req0
term
term
Property p_m1;
@(posedge clk0) req0 ##1 req1[*2:M] |=> gnt;
endproperty
20
|=>
term [*2:M]
gnt
req1
##1
req0
term
term
Recursive Construction
21
|=>
term [*2:M]
gnt
req1
##1
req0
term
term
Recursive Construction
0
1
clk0_posedge
data_in1
22
R1 ##1 R2
R1
APstart
R2
APstart
clk
start AP
R1 R2
##1
23
R1 ##0 R2
R1
APstart
R2
APstartstart AP
24
R1 ##0 R2
R1
APstart
R2
APstartstart AP
R is equivalent to
(R ##0 1)
(1 ##0 R)
25
Outline
Introduction— Background and scope— Related works
Synthesizing Multi-clock SVA— Single clock assertion compilation— Compile through semantic rewriting
Penalty: Double the checker logic size— On-the-fly synthesis algorithm
No penalty Proof of correctness
Experimental results and conclusions
26
SVA Semantic Rewriting Rules
27
Rewriting: An Example
28
Synthesize Through Rewriting
|=>
##1
[*2:3]
[*0:$]
##1
term
!clk1clk1&&req1
term
[*0:$]
##1
term
!clk0 clk0&&req0
term
[*0:$]
##1
term
!clk2 clk2&&gnt
term
|=>
##1
req0
term
req1
term
gnt
term
[*2:3]
29
Synthesiz3 Through Rewriting
|=>
##1
[*2:3]
[*0:$]
##1
term
!clk1clk1&&req1
term
[*0:$]
##1
term
!clk0 clk0&&req0
term
[*0:$]
##1
term
!clk2 clk2&&gnt
term
|=>
##1
req0
term
req1
term
gnt
term
[*2:3]
1. Checker logic: Correct by Construction
30
Synthesis Through Rewriting
|=>
##1
[*2:3]
[*0:$]
##1
term
!clk1clk1&&req1
term
[*0:$]
##1
term
!clk0 clk0&&req0
term
[*0:$]
##1
term
!clk2 clk2&&gnt
term
|=>
##1
req0
term
req1
term
gnt
term
[*2:3]
2. Rewriting rule (2.1): size of the tree doubled
1. Checker logic: Correct by Construction
31
On-the-fly Synthesis
Motivation— Avoid the penalty from the rewriting— Model clock directly
Compilation procedure— Annotate syntax tree with clock information— Adapt to existing recursive compilation— Model clocked constructs directly— Proof of correctness through construction
32
Annotated Abstract Syntax Tree
Prop
Bool
R
|=>
term [*2:M]
gnt
req1
##1
req0
term
term
clk2
clk1
clk1
clk1 clk2 clk2
clk2 clk3
clk3clk3
clk2 clk2
33
Annotated Abstract Syntax Tree
Prop
Bool
R
|=>
term [*2:M]
gnt
req1
##1
req0
term
term
clk2
clk1
clk1
clk1 clk2 clk2
clk2 clk3
clk3clk3
clk2 clk2
34
Annotated Abstract Syntax Tree
Prop
Bool
R
|=>
term [*2:M]
gnt
req1
##1
req0
term
term
clk2
clk1
clk1
clk1 clk2 clk2
clk2 clk3
clk3clk3
clk2 clk2
35
On-the-fly Model
Annotated node with a single clock 1. @clk (b)
2. @clk (R1 ##1 R2)
Annotated node with two different clocks3. @clk1 R1 ##1 @clk2 R2
36
Basic Block 1: @clk(b)
@clk
bAp
1
0
1
37
Basic Block 2: @clk(R1 ##1 R2)
Ap Ap
startstart
IA
@clk
R1
01
R21
##1
38
Basic Block 2: @clk(R1 ##1 R2)
Ap Ap
startstart
IA
@clk
R1
01
R21
39
Building Block 3: @clk1 R1 ##1 @clk2 R2
Ap Apstartstart
IA
@clk1
R1 R2
@clk2
and or
and
1
s0
40
Building Block 3: @clk1 R1 ##1 @clk2 R2
Ap Apstartstart
IA
@clk1
R1 R2
@clk2
and or
and
1
s0
41
Building Block 3: @clk1 R1 ##1 @clk2 R2
Ap Apstartstart
IA
@clk1
R1 R2
@clk2
and or
and
1
s0
s0 <= ( R1.Ap && @clk1 )
||
( s0 && !@clk2 )
42
NFA View: @clk1 R1 ##1 @clk2 R2
Ap start
IA
startR2 Ap
@clk1
@clk2
@clk1
!@clk2
@clk2
R1s0
43
Outline
Introduction— Background and scope— Related works
Synthesizing Multi-clock SVA— Single clock assertion compilation— Compile through semantic rewriting
Penalty: Double the checker logic size— On-the-fly synthesis algorithm
No penalty Proof of correctness
Experimental results and conclusions
44
SVA Rewriting Rules
45
Proof of Correctness
Lemmas1. R equals. R ##0 12. R equals. 1 ##0 R
46
Proof of Correctness
Lemmas1. R equals. R ##0 12. R equals. 1 ##0 R3. @clk R equals. @clk ( R ##0 1 )4. @clk R equals. @clk ( 1 ##0 R)
47
Lemmas1. R equals. R ##0 12. R equals. 1 ##0 R3. @clk R equals. @clk ( R ##0 1 )4. @clk R equals. @clk ( 1 ##0 R)5. @clk R equals. @clk 1 ##0 @clk R6. @clk R equals. @clk R ##0 @clk 1
Proof of Correctness
48
Proof of Correctness
Lemmas1. R equals. R ##0 12. R equals. 1 ##0 R3. @clk R equals. @clk ( R ##0 1 )4. @clk R equals. @clk ( 1 ##0 R)5. @clk R equals. @clk 1 ##0 @clk R6. @clk R equals. @clk R ##0 @clk 1
@clk1 R1 ##1 @clk2 R2
49
Proof of Correctness
Lemmas1. R equals. R ##0 12. R equals. 1 ##0 R3. @clk R equals. @clk ( R ##0 1 )4. @clk R equals. @clk ( 1 ##0 R)5. @clk R equals. @clk 1 ##0 @clk R6. @clk R equals. @clk R ##0 @clk 1
@clk1 R1 ##1 @clk2 R2
7. @clk1 (R1 ##0 1) ##1 @clk2 ( 1 ##0 R2 )
50
Proof of Correctness
Lemmas1. R equals. R ##0 12. R equals. 1 ##0 R3. @clk R equals. @clk ( R ##0 1 )4. @clk R equals. @clk ( 1 ##0 R)5. @clk R equals. @clk 1 ##0 @clk R6. @clk R equals. @clk R ##0 @clk 1
@clk1 R1 ##1 @clk2 R2
7. @clk1 (R1 ##0 1) ##1 @clk2 ( 1 ##0 R2 )
8. @clk1 R1 ##0 @clk11 ##1 @clk21 ##0 @clk2 R2
51
Proof
8. @clk1 R1 ##0 @clk11 ##1 @clk21 ##0 @clk2 R2
52
Proof
8. @clk1 R1 ##0 @clk11 ##1 @clk21 ##0 @clk2 R2
53
Proof
8. @clk1 R1 ##0 @clk11 ##1 @clk21 ##0 @clk2 R2
54
Proof
8. @clk1 R1 ##0 @clk11 ##1 @clk21 ##0 @clk2 R2
9. !clk1[*0:$] ##1 clk1 ##1 !clk2[*0:$] ##1 clk2
55
Proof
!clk1[*0:$] ##1 clk1 ##1 !clk2[*0:$] ##1 clk2
Ap Apstartstart
IA
@clk1
R1 R2
@clk2
and or
and
1
8. @clk1 R1 ##0 @clk11 ##1 @clk21 ##0 @clk2 R2
9. !clk1[*0:$] ##1 clk1 ##1 !clk2[*0:$] ##1 clk2
56
Proof
!clk1[*0:$] ##1 clk1 ##1 !clk2[*0:$] ##1 clk2
8. @clk1 R1 ##0 @clk11 ##1 @clk21 ##0 @clk2 R2
9. !clk1[*0:$] ##1 clk1 ##1 !clk2[*0:$] ##1 clk2
Ap start
IA
startR2 Ap
@clk1
@clk2
@clk1
!@clk2
@clk2
R1s1
57
Proof
!clk1[*0:$] ##1 clk1 ##1 !clk2[*0:$] ##1 clk2
8. @clk1 R1 ##0 @clk11 ##1 @clk21 ##0 @clk2 R2
9. !clk1[*0:$] ##1 clk1 ##1 !clk2[*0:$] ##1 clk2
Ap Apstartstart
IA
@clk1
R1 R2
@clk2
and or
and
1
s0
58
Special Case: @clk(R1 ##1 R2)
Ap Ap
startstart
IA
@clk
R1
01
R21
59
Ap Ap
startstart
IA
@clk
R1
01
R21
clk1==clk2
Special Case: @clk(R1 ##1 R2)
Ap Apstartstart
IA
@clk1
R1 R2
@clk2
and or
and
1
s0
60
Experimental Results
61
Experimental Results
62
Experimental Results
2x
63
Conclusion
Efficient synthesis of multi-clock assertions— Create a generic checker logic— Direct modeling to avoid the doubling penalty— Proof of correctness
On-the-fly Synthesis of Multi-Clock SVA
Jiang Long
Andrew Seawright
Paparao Kavalipati
IWLS’ 2008
top related