observing heavy higgs in weak boson fusion with forward jet tagging at the cern cms experiment

Post on 03-Jan-2016

17 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Observing Heavy Higgs in Weak Boson Fusion with Forward Jet Tagging at the CERN CMS Experiment. HATICE DURAN YILDIZ DUMLUPINAR UNIVERSITY TURKEY. LHC, PRAHA CONFERENCE JULY 6-12, 2003. Outline. Standard Model & Higgs Mechanism Higgs Observation LHC-CMS experiment Weak Boson Fusion (WBF) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Observing Heavy Higgs in Weak Boson Fusion with Forward Jet Tagging at the

CERN CMS Experiment

HATICE DURAN YILDIZ

DUMLUPINAR UNIVERSITY

TURKEY

LHC, PRAHA CONFERENCE JULY 6-12, 2003

Outline Standard Model & Higgs Mechanism Higgs Observation LHC-CMS experiment Weak Boson Fusion (WBF) Analysis of qqqqH, HWWljj qqqqH, HZZlljj qqqqH, HZZll Results

mH300 GeV

Limits of the Higgs Mass :• The mass of the Higgs boson is a free parameter because

of the unknown coupling λ, but• SM gives us information about the allowed mass range, by choosing

2Hm)( & finite &

Theoretical constraints & experimental limits :TeVmH 1 : unitarity purpose

Above this value, perturbation theory is not valid.

• Another hint for the mass of the H boson comes from the precision fits to electroweak observables : GeVmGeV H 21298

• Direct experimental search at LEP2 gives the lower bound on Higgs mass as : .1.114 GeVmH

gg fusion WW/ZZ fusion

associated Httassociated WH, ZH

BR

Characteristics of WBF

Forward Jets

Centrally produced Leptons

Color coherence between forward quarks

q

q

HW

W

W

l

q

q

W

qqqqH, HWWljj

# Events are generated with PYTHIA (6152).

# Calorimeter simulation, jet and ETmiss reconstruction

with CMSJET

# Jet reconstructions cone size = 0.5 for mH=600 GeV

= 0.7 for mH=300 GeV

# For pile-up:

--> 2 min. bias events superimposed at low luminosity

# We assume 90% efficiency to account for lepton reconstruction and trigger

Simulation of Events

I have looked the final states ofOne isolated lepton

Two central jets from W & ZOne forward jet + one backward jet

Main Backgrounds fromtt events

W + jets eventsZ + jets events

We show our results;For low luminosity only

For low (300 GeV) and for high mass (600 GeV) HIGGS

mH = 200 & 800 GeV studied too

How to isolate Higgs events?Signature, mass peakFind two vector bosons in event as H WW, ZZWl and Z Z llZ jj and W jjReconstructed Higgs WW or ZZ system

Exploit special Kinematics Pt(WW,ZZ) Pt(W,Z) Pt(l)Angular cuts

Higgs Production ModeWeak Boson Fusion: Tagging jets with very high mass

SELECTION CUTS:One isolated leptonNo charged track with pt>2 GeV in a cone R<0.3 around the lepton

pTl >30 GeV

Reconstruction of Leptonic W:

Pl is resolved from mW constraint

The smaller of the two solutions is selected

ETmiss >60 GeV

for 600 GeV & nocut for 300 GeV

PTWl>200 GeV for 600 GeV & no cut for mH=300 GeV

GeVEwith jetT 302

)1( jetjjW

Central jet cuts: No extra jet in

Top mass veto cut: Reconstruct top mass from 3 central jets

cut on

GeVmtop 220120

Etjets > 40

Reconstruction of Hadronic W for 600 GeV

Start asking 2 jets, ET > 40 GeV for Wjj and reconstruct mjj

No mass reconstructed since only 1j found (36%)

Reconstr. W mass in thecalorimeter for events with

1 central j & for events inthe tail mjj > 100 GeV.

Start from the directionof harder jet (or single jet), add cells in a cone R=0.9

Large tail dueto merging jets

W Reconstruction of hadronic W for mH=300 GeVTwo central jets with jet< 2

ETjet> 40 GeV

Problem of merged jets not too serious for mH=300 GeV.

Mass window cut65 < mjj < 100

Cut on PTW Hadronic >200 for mH=600 GeV

>100 for mH=300 GeV

PtHiggs

> 40 GeV

jjlWWH

S + B

Signal

Forward Jet Tagging

One forward & one backward jet with

2.0<jet<5

ETjet>20 GeV

For mH=600 GeV

Forward jet selection for mH=300 GeVForw. jet: Take the most energetic jet with >0 not in Wjj

Back. jet: Take the most energetic jet with >0 not in Wjj

Cut in | forw-back|>5

Cut in

|forw-back|>5

signal

W+jetstt

Forward jet energies for signal and backgrounds

How Big!!

300 GeV 600 GeV

Signal 25.3% 23.9%

tt 1.13% 1.6%

W + Jets 0.38% 0.6%

Efficiency for forward jet tagging

GeVE jetforw 300.

cutAsymGeVEGeVE jT

jT .50,30 21

TeVm jj 11. jetforwl

jjjj ,

Tagging cuts:

We have also tried

Event Selection for HWWlvjj for mH=300 GeV

Tagging jet

reductions

Com

pare

?

X 1000

Event Selection for HWWlvjj for mH=600 GeV

X 100

Com

pare

?

Event Selection for HZZlljj for mH=300 GeV

Event Selection for HZZlljj for mH=600 GeV

jjlWWH

mH=300 GeV

jjlWWH

jjlWWH

llZ

Same selection criterion used for Zlljj except Zll

lljjZZH

jjZ

lljjZZH

S+B

lljjZZH

Signal + backgro

und

GeVmforllZZH H 600

Channel mH=300GeV mH=600GeV mH=800GeV mH=200GeV

HWWllvj 10.3 7.8 6.2 3.9HZZlljj 7.8 8.5 6.3HZZllvv 3.6 5.5 3.2

Expected luminosities in fb-1 for 5 discovery

S / For an integrated luminosity of 30 fb-1B

Channel mH=300 GeV mH=600 GeV mH=800 GeV

HWWllvj 7.1 12.3 19.5

HZZlljj 12.3 10.4 18.9

HZZllvv 57.8 24.8 73.2

Channel Signal tt W/Z+jets

HWW l lvj x BR=0.015 pb

53 20 53

HZZ l ljj x BR=0.005 pb

16 6.2

HZZ l lvv x BR=0.0009 pb

6.4 4.1

Signal and background for H WW / ZZ with

mH=800 GeV

CONCLUSIONSIf Higgs Boson exists; HWWlvjj

HZZlljj

Channels via Weak Boson Fusion mechanism are potential Discovery channels at CMS experiment at CERN, LHC accelerator.

In 1 year of LHC running, CMS experiment would manifest with mass 300-800 GeV in WBF.

The analysis,HWWllvj for mH=200 GeV is still statistically acceptable.

Channel is MSSM is hopeless to observe any Higgs signal.

top related