non-residential suburbanisation in the czech republic (prague and brno)
Post on 04-Jan-2016
43 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Non-residential suburbanisation in the Czech Republic
(Prague and Brno)
Luděk Sýkora & Martin Ouředníček
Charles University in Prague, Czechia
SELMA meeting, Madrid, June 27-29, 2003
Case study: Czech Republic (Prague, Brno)
1) The context2) Case study cities3) Method
– Territorial division of urban area– Data used (population, employment, land use)
4) Population deconcentration 1991-20015) Employment deconcentration 1991-20016) Land use change 1991-20017) Conclusion
The context: suburbanisation in Czech metropolitan areas
Suburbanisation is a very recent phenomena: it developed in last 5 years
Until mid 1990s there was only marginal residential suburbanisation (limited purchasing power of population)
Since 1997: radical development of commercial suburbanisation (shopping centres and retail parks, warehousing and logistic zones)
Since the end of 1990s: dynamic development of residential suburbanisation (growth in wealth and introduction of mortgages)
Residential suburbanisation
Individual homebuilders as well as whole districts made by one developer
High share of inhabitants with high incomes
State supported mortgages Changing socio-spatial pattern in
metropolitan area Social polarisation in suburban
localities
retail, warehousing and distribution, (industry)
demand from international firms expanding on Czech markets
logistic and retail parks close to highways (and Metro)
Commercial suburbanisation
Suburbanisation of retail
Radical growth since 1997 First suburban shopping in Prague opened in 1996 (IKEA in
Zličín) and four main concentrations developed since that time Massive explosion of retail in Brno Radical transformation in spatial pattern of shopping
– 1989: half of retail turnover in city centre– 1998: hypermarket as first shopping place for 4% of Czechs– 2000: hypermarket as first shopping place for 20% of Czechs and
25% of Prague inhabitants
An example of consequences:Increase in car transportation 1996-2001
Prague - suburban zone 164000 -> 267000, 1.6 % Prague - outer areas 83000 -> 86000, 1.0 % Transit 16000 -> 25000, 1.6 % Total 263000 -> 378000, 1.4 %
70 % of all journeys is commuting between Prague and suburbs Suburban commuting accounted for 90 % of growth between
1996-2001
Management of suburban growth
Its regulation requires regional planning and policy tools. Czech planning system has physical plans for regions and
strategies of regional development: neither of them includes the issue of sprawl.
However, the major planning authority is at the municipal level Fragmented local government in metropolitan areas Two regional governments in the case of Prague´s metropolitan
region Central government support to FDI was in 1998-2000
exclusively allocated to greenfield investments.
Case study cities in the Czech Republic
Method: territorial division of metropolitan area
City centreInner cityFirst suburban zone - inside city boundariesSecond suburban zone - outside city boundaries
Territorial units in Prague Metropolitan Area
*Prague - city parts
District Area (km2) Municipalities Cadastral territories
Basic settlement units
Prague 496 1 (57)* 112 901
Prague-East 584 91 137 233
Prague-West 586 80 112 175
Total PMA 1666 172 (228) 361 1309
Demographic characteristics (Census 1.3.2001)
District Population
Density of population
Share of children0-14
Share of people60+
Share of university educated
Share of houses constructed 1991-2001
Prague 1 169 106 2357 13,4 % 20,7 % 18,8 % 10,9 %
Prague-East
96 061 164 15,7 % 18,6 % 9,5 % 14,6 %
Prague-West
83 089 142 16,3 % 18,2 % 11,1 % 18,0 %
Total PMA
1 350 257 810 13,7 % 20,4 % 17,7 % 12,8 %
Population deconcentration 1991-2001
Data from annual statistics for population growth and migration and censuses 1991, 2001 for structures of population (preliminary results)
PMA - Natural decrease of population of each zone Centre and inner city: natural and migration
decrease 1st suburban ring: from slow migration increase to
stagnation 2nd suburban ring: from slow migration increase to
rapid suburbanisation process
Population change in Prague’s metropolitan region (1991-2001)
Změna 2001/1991 85 - 99 % 100 - 109 % 110 - 129 % 130 - 159 % 160 - 235 %
Gross rates (per mille) 1991* 1996 2000
code zoneNaturalincrease
Migration
increaseTotalincrease
Naturalincrease
Migration
increaseTotalincrease
Naturalincrease
Migration
increaseTotalincrease
a center -4,95 -2,66 -7,61 -10,54 -8,90 -19,44 -8,34 -10,27 -18,62
b inner city -0,97 5,98 5,01 -3,79 -0,28 -4,07 -2,82 -2,46 -5,28
c 1st suburban -2,23 2,44 0,21 -5,18 2,17 -3,01 -3,58 0,02 -3,57
d 2nd suburban -2,69 0,39 -2,31 -4,39 5,54 1,15 -2,35 20,42 18,06
a+b+c City of Prague -1,72 3,96 2,23 -4,68 0,64 -4,04 -3,35 -1,48 -4,84
a+b+c+d PMA -1,84 3,52 1,68 -4,64 1,24 -3,41 -3,23 1,32 -1,90
d1 Prague-East -1,84 -0,45 -2,29 -4,28 3,07 -1,20 -3,31 15,44 12,13
d2 Prague-West -3,75 1,43 -2,32 -4,53 8,56 4,03 -1,24 26,26 25,03
* For zones a, b, c only period 3.3.-31.12.1991
Components of population growth
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
pe
r m
ille
centerinner city1st suburban2nd suburbanCity of PraguePMAPrague-EastPrague-West
Net migration 1991-2000
Employment deconcentration 1991-2001
Decline in employment until mid 1990s due to transformation
Employment growth in suburban zone from mid 1990s
Growth namely in retail and wholesale (5 times in Prague-east and 20 times in Prague East) and storage, transport and communication
Average number of employees in the civil sector: NUTS 3 a NUTS 4
(actual persons)Region/district 1991 1993 1996 1999 2001
Czech Republic 4 016 313 3 424 566 3 029 675 3 200 265 3 121 673Capital Prague 569 400 414 518 418 133 473 639 467 811Central Bohemia 384 337 324 242 273 913 300 494 299 601Prague-East 25 670 22 012 18 407 23 443 24 167Prague-West 15 877 13 128 10 921 15 642 15 543
Unemployment rate: 31 December
district 1991 1996 2001Capital Prague 1,16 0,43 3,39Prague-East 1,63 0,54 2,92Prague-West 4,24 0,59 2,51
Employment and unemployment1991-2001
Prague total A-B C-E F G H I J K L M N O1993 414518 1993 91695 36020 26341 6748 53513 19903 41871 26534 45370 35067 294631996 418133 591 67577 35477 25555 10973 53962 31330 51697 34363 44730 32202 296761999 473639 875 68363 31173 63745 15827 54021 32275 66571 33848 45228 31852 298612001 467811 1448 63368 27029 60001 16187 57041 32375 68299 37058 43731 32424 28850Prague-East1996 18407 979 6365 1966 1096 53 1124 212 1570 1238 2035 1023 7461999 23443 915 9001 1067 3974 269 1626 172 1774 1073 2073 901 5982001 24167 915 8462 845 5101 245 2007 155 1862 1035 2037 1025 478Prague-West1996 10921 690 3745 1053 98 25 1265 82 860 900 1411 465 3271999 15642 687 5275 944 2985 291 1639 49 1419 816 646 501 3902001 15543 575 5186 1155 2037 206 2062 72 1095 832 1374 567 382
Structure of registered employment 1993-2001
Economic structure
NACE – CZ
A-B AGRICULTURE, HUNTING AND FORESTRY;FISHINGC-E TOTAL INDUSTRYF CONSTRUCTIONG WHOLESALE AND RETAIL TRADE; REPAIR OF MOTOR VEHICLES, MOTORCYCLES AND PERSONAL AND HOUSEHOLD GOODSH HOTELS AND RESTAURANTSI TRANSPORT, STORAGE AND COMMUNICATIONSJ FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATIONK REAL ESTATE, RENTING AND BUSINESS ACTIVITIESL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEFENCE; COMPULSORY SOCIAL SECURITYM EDUCATIONN HEALTH AND SOCIAL WORKO OTHER COMMUN.,SOCIAL AND PERS.SERVICE ACTIVITIES
Land use change 1991-2001
Retail Warehousing, distribution, logictics Industry Office
Share of build-up on total land-use
Out-of-centre and suburban shopping
Out-of-centre and suburban offices
top related