“my clinical evaluations are so subjective!” - acp · pdf filepractice writing a...

Post on 05-Feb-2018

215 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

“My clinical evaluations areso subjective!”

Evaluating Learners and Writing Helpful Clinical Performance Narratives

Part 2: Feedback

Julie A. Vannerson, MD, FACP

T. Robert Vu, MD, FACP

Jack D. Buckley, MD, FACP

1

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

COI Disclosures• None to report

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Learning Objectives Explain teaching cycle

Define Feedback

Describe characteristics of effective feedback

Define levels of feedback

Practice writing a clinical performance narrative

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Teaching Cycle

Communication of Goals

Evaluation

Feedback

Learning Climate

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Communication of Goals

Knowledge

Skills

Attitudes

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Communication of Goals Definition

Establishment & explicit expression of teacher’s and/or learner’s expectations for learner

Function

Let learners know what to master

Guide teacher in planning instruction

Provide learners & teacher with basis for evaluation

6

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Evaluation

LEARNER

CONTENT

TEACHER

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Evaluation Definition

Evaluation is process by which teacher assesses learners' KSA, based on criteria related to educational goals

Types Summative

Formative

Methods Observation

Questioning

Self-assessment

8

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Teaching Cycle

Communication of Goals

Evaluation

Feedback

Learning Climate

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Difference between EV & FB

LEARNER

CONTENT

TEACHER

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

When I Say Feedback, You Say…

11

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Why is Feedback Hard?

12

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Feedback

LEARNER

CONTENT

TEACHER

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Feedback Types Two Sides of the Same Coin

Evaluation Feedback Formative

Occurs throughout teaching/learning process

To assess learner’s progresstowards educational goals

Summative

Final assessment of learner’s performance at the end of a learning experience (course, rotation, etc)

Formative Given throughout teaching/learning

process; commonly at mid-point Typically verbal Not linked to a grade/final decision Meant to improve performance

Summative Final report at end of a learning

experience Narrative comments typically

required May be linked to a grade/final

decision about advancement Meant to improve performance

14

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Effective Feedback1. Pre-work

2. Specificity

3. Focus

4. Frequency

5. Timing

6. Positive/Negative

7. Learner reaction

8. Action plan

15

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Effective Feedback1. Pre-work

2. Specificity

3. Focus

4. Frequency

5. Timing

6. Positive/Negative

7. Learner reaction

8. Action plan

16

LC

Feedback

CG

EV

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Effective Feedback1. Pre-work

2. Specificity

3. Focus

4. Frequency

5. Timing

6. Positive/Negative

7. Learner reaction

8. Action plan

17

LC

Feedback

CG

EV

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

A Word About Specificity Descriptive

Related to behaviors set forth in goals

Observable, behavior-based

Directed toward remediable behaviors

Avoid assessments of personal characteristics (quiet voice, stuttering, etc.)

18

LC

Feedback

CG

EV

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Effective Feedback1. Specificity

2. Focus

3. Frequency

4. Timing

5. Positive/Negative

6. Learner reaction

7. Action plan

19

LC

Feedback

CG

EV

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Levels of Feedback Minimal feedback

Behavioral feedback

Interactive feedback

20

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Minimal Feedback Teaching behaviors

Tell learner that performance is correct or incorrect

Agree or disagree with learner’s opinions

Use nonverbal cues like nodding

21

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Minimal Feedback Formative feedback examples

“No”

“That’s correct”

“I disagree”

Summative feedback examples

“X did an excellent job. He is a pleasure to work with.”

“Good job”

“Solid student”

22

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Behavioral Feedback Teaching behaviors

Describe learner’s performance as behaviors

Tell learner why performance is correct or incorrect

Give reasons for agreement or disagreement

Offer behavioral suggestions for improvement

23

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Behavioral Feedback Formative feedback examples

“During rounds, you frequently interrupted the other team members.”

“Your choice of antibiotic dose is correct because it is adjusted for his creatinine clearance”

“I disagree with your discharge plan for his diabetes because it requires him to self-titrate his insulin. It would be safer for him to wait until he sees his PCP for titration”

24

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Behavioral Feedback Summative feedback examples

“Very hardworking, arriving early and willing to stay till the work is done.”

“Had a cursory knowledge of clinical pharmacotherapy in the patients he saw, often having difficulty generating a list of the most common and most dangerous side effects.”

“Knew how to recognize with her clinical exam the difference between a patient who was stable and a patient who was decompensating.”

25

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Interactive Feedback

26

LT & L

CONTENT

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Interactive Feedback Teaching behaviors

Give learner FB (minimal/behavioral) then have learner self-assess

Have learner self-assess then give FB on ability to self-assess

Give learner FB on performance then elicit learner’s reaction

Develop an action plan with learner

27

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Interactive Feedback Techniques Ask-tell-ask

Pendleton model

Reflective feedback conversation

28

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Ask-Tell-Ask Ask learner to assess own performance

What is learner’s insight into own performance?

Tell learner what you observed

Include both positives and negatives

Ask learner if they understand

Ask for alternative behaviors

Make suggestions

Make a plan for monitoring

29

Konopasek L, Bar-on M, Ask-Tell-Ask: A Tastier Feedback Sandwich.

http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/2015%20AEC/Presentations/ses039.pdf

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Ask-Tell-Ask Pros?

Cons?

30

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Pendleton Model Ask learner to state what was good about own

performance

Provide positive feedback

Ask learner to state what could be improved about own performance

Provide negative/corrective feedback

31

Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P, Havelock P. The consultation: an approach to learning and

teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Pendleton Model Pros?

Cons?

32

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Reflective Feedback Conversation Ask learner to share any concerns about recently

completed performance

Ask learner to describe concerns & what they would have liked to have done better

Tell learner views on performance of concern & offer support

Ask learner to reflect on what might improve situation

Elaborate on learner response, correcting if necessary, & check for learner understanding

33

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Reflective Feedback Conversation Pros?

Cons?

34

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Your Turn for Feedback Watch the video clip

Spend 5 minutes writing

Debrief

35

Stanford Faculty Development Center 2016

Why is Feedback Hard?

36

top related