mesoporous catalysis

Mesoporous Catalysis

Ben Lehtovaara1

Andrew Finkle1

1Department of Chemical Engineering (Nanotechnology), University of Waterloo,

Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Outline

– Recap of Mesoporous Material Synthesis

– Introduction to Petroleum Refining

– Introduction to Biofuel Refining

– Zeolites vs. Mesoporous Materials

– Biofuel Refining Using Mesoporous/Zeolite Composites

MCM - 41

Introduction to Petroleum Refining• Crude Oil Contains

o methane, ethane, propane, aromatics, cycloalkanes, alkenes, and alkynes

• Crude oil is refined to smaller distillates and/or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG; varying ratios of propane/butane)

• Hydrocracking creates smaller distillates with high temperatures and partial pressure of H2

• Mild Hydrocracking uses lower temperatures and pressures to create smaller distillates

• Hydrocracking uses noble metals supported on mesoporous material, aluminosilicates, or zeolites. Each with their own advantages / disadvantages.

• Our Focus: Mesoporous Catalysis

R=catalyst (i.e. noble metal)

Mesoporous Materials Synthesis

– Mesoporous (~2-50nm pores) require surfactants as templating material to achieve desired structure

– Formation of Micelles via Surfactant Self Assembly– Controled pore size

• Surfactant chain length• Surfactant to Silica ratio• Swelling by organic additives

Effects of Surfactant Parameters• Changes micelle dimensions and pore sizes

o Surfactant/Si Ratio changes phase (e.g. cubic)

MCM-41 Hex. Structure

Swelling Agent

“Rod-like micelles”

Other factors:-Temperature-pH-nature of surfactant

• Sol-gel chemistry• Hydrolysis to create

hydroxymetallates• Acidic catalyst such as NaF

effective

• Condensation to creation oxolated bridges between an inorganic framework

Mesoporous Materials Synthesis

Cracking of Gas Oil

• Hydrocracking involves creating smaller distillates under high T,P

• Activity is greatest for Zeolite material (USY-1), followed by Mesoporous MCM-41, and Amorphous Silica Aluminosilicates (ASA)

• High Activity is a result of the higher SA of the zeolite material (pore=~2-5nm)

• Zeolites are currently the industry choice for hydrocracking

• At high T, P: most mesoporous materials collapse

Mild Hydrocarbon Cracking• Mild conditions (lower T, P) are more advantageous to mesoporous

material activity due to a decrease in pore collapse at high T,P (more SA)• This leads to increased MCM-41 desirability due to:

• Larger exposed surface area• Increased dispersion of catalytic sites

• Removal of heteroatoms to reduce emission of sulfur dioxide nitrous oxides which are detrimental to the environment

Biofuel Refining• Biomass Refining: Refine

to bio-oil that is catalytically upgraded to standard fuels

• Leaves, shoots, fronds of oil palm tree

• Palm Oil Refining: Palm oil is converted to methyl/ ethyl esters (biodiesel) by transesterification

Palm Biomass Refining• Leaves, Shoots, and Fronds of Oil Palm Tree• Pyrolysis: decomposition in absence of oxygen

o produces gaseous hydrocarbons, coke, and bio-oilo Nickel on mesoporous materials improves bio-oil yield

• Gasification: temperatures higher than 720 degrees celsiuso produces CO, H2, CO2, and methaneo Fischer Tropsch Synthesis converts CO and H2 into liquid

hydrocarbons such as Liquid Petrolium Gas (LPG)

• Catalytic upgrading on mesoporous materials produces transportation fuels from both palm biomass and bio-oil

Palm Oil Refining

Effect of Si/Al ratio on Palm Oil Cracking• Incorporation of some Aluminum hetero atoms through exchange

with Si atoms results in a stronger Lewis Acid due to interaction with noble metal (NiMo)

• Catalyst materials synthesized via sol-gel, hydrothermal, ion-exchange and grafting methods

• Optimal Si/Al ratio around 20:1

• Linear hydrocarbon production is proportional to pore size• Catalytic activity is proportional to surface area• Palm kernel oil had a higher conversion rate then palm olein oil

Effects of Pore Size on Palm Oil Cracking

Increase pore size

Mesoporous / Zeolite Composite as Hydrocarbon cracking catalyst

• MCM-41 / ZSM-5 Composite for biofuel applicationso MCM-41 selective to C5+ olefin

products (diesel gasoline)o MCM-41 lacks in catalytic activity,

incorporate ZSM-5o Composite named CMZo Mesoporous structure synthesized on

surface of ZSM-5 particles• Microporous structure is combined with a

mesoporous material.

Zeolite: ZSM-5

Mesostructure:MCM-41

Composite Zeo/Meso:CMZ (0.2,0)

CMZ NitrogenIsotherms

• Increased SA of composite• Decreased SA with increased

Aluminumo Due to Loss of Crystallinity

Catalytic Activity and Selectivity

• CMZ(0.2,0.05) had highest yield and selectivity

• More liquid fewer gas products • desirable

ConclusionsThere are distinct advantages of mesoporous materials over traditional zeolites• Larger pores facilitate mass transport and selectivity for C5+

products• More versatile synthesis techniques that require lower T and

P and shorter periods of time (Zeolites take weeks, mesoporous take days/hours)

• Versatility in the incorporation of other materials (heteroatoms for catalysts) into their active sites (Al3+, Ti4+)

• Currently not as effective as zeolites in fuel refining activity• Composite Zeo/Meso materials do improve performance

• Mesoporous materials have the most distinct advantages in the realm mild hydrocarbon cracking

References1. Adam, J., M. Blazso, E. Meszaros, M. Stocker, M. Nilsen, A Bouzga, J. Hustad, M. Gronli, and G. Oye. 2005. Pyrolysis of

biomass in the presence of Al-MCM-41 type catalysts. Fuel 84: 1494-1502.2. Beck, J. S., J. C. Vartuli, W. J. Roth, M. E. Leonowicz, C. T. Kresge, K. D. Schmitt, C. T. W. Chu, D. H. Olson, and E. W.

Sheppard. 1992. A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates. Journal of the American Chemical Society 114, no. 27: 10834-10843.

3. Biz, S., and M. Occelli. 1998. Synthesis and Characterization of Mesostructured Materials. Catalysis Reviews 40, no. 3: 329-4074. Chew, T. L., and S. Bhatia. 2008. Catalytic processes towards the production of biofuels in a palm oil and oil palm biomass-

based biorefinery. Bioresource technology 99, no. 17: 7911-22.5. Corma, A., A. Martinez, V. Martinezsoria, and JB Monton. 1995. Hydrocracking of Vacuum Gasoil on the novel mesoporous

mcm-41 aluminosilicate catalyst. Journal of Catalysis 153, no. 1: 25–31.6. Corma, A. 1996. Cracking Activity and Hydrothermal Stability of MCM-41 and Its Comparison with Amorphous Silica-Alumina

and a USY Zeolite. Journal of Catalysis 159, no. 2: 375-382.7. Corma, A. 1997. From Microporous to Mesoporous Molecular Sieve Materials and Their use in Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 97: 2373-

2420.8. Kresge, C. T., W. J. Leonowicz, W. J. Roth, J. C. Vartuli, and J. S. Beck. 1992. Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves

synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. Nature Letters 39: 710-712.9. Mokaya, R., W. Jones, Z. Luan, M. D. Alba, and J. Klinowski. 1996. Acidity and catalytic activity of the mesoporous

aluminosilicate molecular sieve MCM-41. Catalysis Letters 37, no. 1-2: 113-120.10.Mokaya, R., and W. Jones. 1996. Acidity and catalytic activity of aluminosilicate mesoporous molecular sieves prepared using

primary amines. Chemical Communications, no. 8: 983-984.11. Mokaya, R., and W. Jones. 1996. Synthesis of acidic aluminosilicate mesoporous molecular sieves using primary amines.

Chemical Communications, no. 8: 981-982.12.Mokaya, R. 1997. Physicochemical Characterisation and Catalytic Activity of Primary Amine Templated Aluminosilicate

Mesoporous Catalysts. Journal of Catalysis 172, no. 1: 211-221.13.Taguchi, A., and F. Schuth. 2005. Ordered mesoporous materials in catalysis. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 77, no. 1:

1-45.14.Trong On, D. 2001. Perspectives in catalytic applications of mesostructured materials. Applied Catalysis A: General 222, no. 1-

2: 299-357.15.Twaiq, F. A. A., A. R. Mohamed, and S. Bhatia. 2003. Liquid hydrocarbon fuels from palm oil by catalytic cracking over

aluminosilicate mesoporous catalysts with various Si/Al ratios. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 64, no. 1-3: 95-107.16.Twaiq, F. A. A., A.R. Mohamad, and S. Bhatia. 2004. Performance of composite catalysts in palm oil cracking for the production

of liquid fuels and chemicals. Fuel Process. Technol. 85, no. 11: 1283-1300.17.Twaiq, F. A. A. 2003. Catalytic conversion of palm oil over mesoporous aluminosilicate MCM-41 for the production of liquid

hydrocarbon fuels. Fuel Process. Technol. 84, no. 1-3: 105-120. 18.U.C. Program, Technology Options 2005, Washington D.C.: US Climate Change Technology Program