master plan vs. strategic plan vs. business...

Post on 26-Feb-2019

218 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

M a s t e r P l a n v s . S t r a t e g i c P l a n v s .

B u s i n e s s P l a n

This seminar was created for the live learning environment of the Athletic Business Conference & Expo. Brailsford & Dunlavey has no financial interest/arrangement that would be considered a conflict of interest.

Learning Object ives

What I f…

What I f…

What I f…

What I f…

What I f…

What I f…

What I f…

Outl ine

Ann Drummie

Br yan Slater

Par t ic ipants

• Organization chart

• Pricing structure

• Operations Pro Forma

• Risk management plan

• Marketing plan

• Maps

• Existing conditions assessment

• Utilization analysis

• Capacity analysis

• Gap analysis

• Recommended program of spaces

• Site criteria chart

• Stakeholder interviews

• Capital cash flow

demand model

• Implementation

schedule

• SWOT analysis

• Compliance review

• Action plans

• Benchmarking

• Core value session

• Demographic

analysis

• Operating paradigm

analysis

• Mission/Visioning

session

Business Plan

StrategicPlan

Master Plan

Master Plan

MSF Phase I Phase 2 Arena sideline outdoor not

Quantity NASF Indoor Sideline Outdoor Notes (East) (West) accommodated

SOFTBALL

Locker Room

Single Tier 18" Lockers 20 7 140 140

Showers 6 27 162 162

Toilets/Urinals 4 23 94 94

Grooming Stations 2 15 30 30

Team Room 1 200 200 200

Office Suite

Head Coach 1 200 200 200

Assistant Coach 1 150 150 150

Practice

70' x 12' Batting/Pitching Tunnel 0 840 0 share with baseball

Batting cage - indoor 0 840 0 share with baseball

Softball Field 0 50,625 0 same as competition

Competition

Softball Field 1 50,625 50,625 50,625

Seating 1,000 7 7,000 7,000

Concessions 1 250 250 250

Restrooms 2 50 100 100

Press Box 1 500 500 500

Storage Area - indoor 1 300 300 300

Storage Area - outdoor 1 300 300 300

total 1,276 8,150 50,625

TENNIS

Men's Locker Room

Single Tier 18" Lockers 20 7 140 140

Showers 6 27 162 162

Toilets/Urinals 4 23 94 94

Grooming Stations 2 15 30 30

Women's Locker Room

Single Tier 18" Lockers 20 7 140 140

Showers 6 27 162 162

Toilets/Urinals 4 23 94 94

Grooming Stations 2 15 30 30

Team Room 1 200 200 200

Office Suite

Head Coach 1 200 200 200

Assistant Coach 1 150 150 150

Practice

Outdoor Tennis Court 6 7,200 43,200 43,200

Indoor Tennis Court 6 7,200 43,200 4 inside 200m, 2 not provided 43,200

Competition

Outdoor Tennis Court 6 7,200 43,200 hav e 6 practice courts also prox imate for dual meets 43,200

Seating 100 7 700 700

Total NASF

Consolidated Option/Site Plan 1Program of Demand

Assumption:

The 50m pool will be incorporated into

new structure

(Chase retrofit for rec programming). Weighting Alum

ni

Stu

dent

Union

OGS

Tennis

Cou

rts

Hillto

p

Sof

tball

Field

Proximity to main part of campus 2 3 3 2 2 1 1

Proximate and sufficient parking at all times 3 -1 -1 3 2 3 2

Enhances overall campus parking scheme 3 -1 -1 3 2 2 1

Centralizes athletic department staff 3 2 3 3 3 3 3

Consolidates athletic training room space 3 2 2 2 2 2 2

Reduces disruption to campus during construction 2 -1 0 3 2 3 1

Maximizes utility and LEEDs efficiencies 2 2 1 1 2 1 1

Minimizes site prep 1 0 0 2 1 2 1

Consistent with overall campus plans and landscaping 1 1 1 2 2 2 0

Allows for easy access from local roads 2 2 1 3 3 0 1

Reduces disruption to neighboring properties 1 1 2 1 2 0 0

Maintains primary view corridors 1 2 1 3 3 3 2

Unweighted Total 12 12 28 26 22 15

Unweighted Rank 5 5 1 2 3 4

Weighted Total 22 23 59 53 47 35

Weighted Rank 6 5 1 2 3 4

3 Site exceeds criteria Weight:

2 Site Meets criteria

1 Site partially meets criteria 3 = very important

0 Site does not meet criteria 2 = important

-1 Site negatively affects criteria 1 = somewhat important

Cost Impact

Amenities $150

General Use 2 250 0 750 0 100 0 7 0 500 0 500 500 $75,000

Intramural League 4 250 0 750 0 100 0 7 0 500 0 500 1,000 $150,000

Club/Varsity Home Games 2 250 2 750 2 100 1,500 7 1 500 1 500 13,700 $2,055,000

Regional Championship Host 4 250 2 750 2 100 3,000 7 2 500 2 500 25,700 $3,855,000

Rink Size buffer W buffer buffer L buffer SF Cost Impact

ice rink (NHL) 6 85 6 6 200 6 20,564 $3,084,600

ice rink (Olympic) 6 100 6 6 200 6 23,744 $3,561,600

Scenario SF Cost Impact

Olympic rink for general use, intramurals, and club/varsity program 37,444 $5,616,600

ICE RINKS

SF

Impact

Changing

Rooms

Locker

Rooms

Officials'

RoomsSeating Concessions Lobby

Cost Impact

Amenities $250

General Use 2 750 0 300 0 100 0 7 0 500 0 500 1,500 $375,000

Intramural League 2 750 0 300 0 100 0 7 0 500 0 500 1,500 $375,000

Club/Varsity Home Meets 2 750 2 300 1 100 700 7 1 500 1 500 8,100 $2,025,000

Regional Championship Host 2 750 2 300 1 100 1,000 7 2 500 2 500 11,200 $2,800,000

Pool 50m 25x25 8 lane Subtotal tank Subtotal SF Cost Impact

Swimming - NCAA 25 yard x 8,000 0 8,000 $2,000,000

Swimming - Olympic 50m x 18,240 0 18,240 $4,560,000

Diving - 1m, 3m 0 x 4,193 4,193 $1,048,125

SCUBA x 8,000 0 8,000 $2,000,000

Water polo x 8,000 0 8,000 $2,000,000

Synchronized Swimming x 8,000 0 8,000 $2,000,000

buffer W buffer buffer L buffer SF

50m x 25y pool 10 75 10 10 167 15 18,240 includes a 3' bulkhead

25m x 25y pool 10 82 10 10 75 15 10,203

8 lane x 25y pool 10 60 10 10 75 15 8,000

diving tank 10 45 10 10 40 15 4,193

NATATORIUMS

SF

Impact

Locker

Rooms

Meeting

Rooms

Officials'

RoomsSeating Concessions Lobby

Cost Impact

Amenities $100

General Use 2 250 0 300 0 100 0 7 0 500 0 500 500 $50,000

Club/Varsity Home Meets 2 250 2 300 1 100 0 7 0 500 0 500 1,200 $120,000

Regional Championship Host 2 250 2 300 2 100 1,000 7 1 500 1 500 9,300 $930,000

Track buffer W buffer buffer L buffer SF Cost Impact

indoor track 6 166 6 8 290 8 54,468 $5,446,800

separate throwing area 6 50 6 6 80 6 5,704 $570,400

separate sprint lanes 6 24 6 8 250 8 9,576 $957,600

INDOOR 200M TRACKS

SF

Impact

Changing

Rooms

Meeting

Rooms

Officials'

RoomsSeating Concessions Lobby

Preliminary Worksheet for Capacity and FF&E Budget of a Weight & Fitness Room

Equipment Type % of Area Area SF allocation Number of units Average price Total cost

Cardio 10.0% 800 50 16 $6,200 $99,200

Selectorized Exercise 0.0% 0 35 0 $2,800 $0

Plate Loaded Exercise 15.0% 1,200 60 20 $3,000 $60,000

Stand Alone Rack 15.0% 1,200 80 15 $2,600 $39,000

Rack on Platform 15.0% 1,200 150 8 $4,600 $36,800

Dumbbells 5.0% 400 70 6 $1,000 $5,714

Stretching/Plyometrics 20.0% 1,600 100 16 $40 $640

Circulation 20.0% 1,600

100.0% 8,000 81 $241,354

Master Plan

•Maps

•Existing conditions

assessment

•Utilization analysis

•Capacity analysis

•Gap analysis

•Capital cash flow

demand model

• Implementation

schedule

•Action plans

•Benchmarking

•Mission/

Visioning

session

•Recommended

program of spaces

•Site criteria chart

•Stakeholder interviews

Strateg ic Plan

0%10%

20%30%

40%50%

60%70%

80%90%

Baseball

Basketball (M)

Football

Golf

Soccer (M)

Tennis (M)

Basketball (W)

Lacrosse

Soccer (W)

Softball

Tennis (W)

Volleyball

Functional Facility Assessment by Team

(Weighted)

% of Target - Current

% of Target - with facility project

Benchmarking Analysis – Facilities (Arena Seating Capacity)

*Christenberry Fieldhouse provides less seating than the average for each of the surveyed subgroups (3,026)

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000Institutional Average = 7,077

Transition Average = 3,739

PBC Average = 3,640

Strateg ic Plan

•SWOT analysis

•Compliance review

•Action plans

•Benchmarking

•Core value

session

•Demographic

analysis

•Operating

paradigm

analysis

•Mission/

Visioning

session

In othe r words

Amanda Braun Director of Athletics University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

In othe r words

Kathleen Hatch, RCRSP Assistant Vice President, Campus Life Executive Director, University Recreation Washington State University

Business Plan

Hig

hest

Low

est

Negative Positive

Typic

al P

ublic A

ccess L

evels

Typical Financial Performance

Operational Models: Access Levels and Associated Financial Performance

Public Model

501(c)3 Non-Profit

Public-Private Partnership

Private

Business Plan

Business Plan

Business Plan

Projected Resident Non-Resident MemberCity

Resident

Non-

ResidentMember

Zumba 200 50 300$52.00 $55.00 $39.00

Pilates 70 40 300$65.00 $68.00 $55.00

Aqua Aumba 50 40 200$48.00 $51.00 $38.00

Swimming Lessons 40 40 150$75.00 $78.00 $55.00

Fit Mix 40 20 125$50.00 $53.00 $38.00

Senior Spinning 40 20 125$76.00 $79.00 $55.00

Silver Sneakers Aerobics 40 10 110$65.00 $68.00 $55.00

Yogalates/Sculpt 20 10 40$65.00 $68.00 $48.00

Business Plan

Business Plan

Business Plan

Business Plan

Activity ResidentNon-

ResidentsMembers Total % Members

Aerobics/Fitness 987 488 1,514 2,989 51%

Aquatics 1,010 1,064 732 2,806 26%

Preschool 672 602 627 1,901 33%

Youth/Teen 168 145 176 489 36%

Adult Sports/Leisure 87 47 561 695 81%

Art 19 22 8 49 16%

Special Events 89 70 76 235 32%

Total 3,032 2,438 3,694 9,164

Business Plan

Activity RevenuePer

ParticipantExpenses

Per

ParticipantNet

Per

Participant

Aerobics/Fitness $140,267 $47 $72,465 $24 $67,802 $23

Aquatics $205,830 $73 $104,125 $37 $101,705 $36

Preschool $79,446 $42 $48,091 $25 $31,355 $16

Youth/Teen $44,623 $91 $31,888 $65 $12,735 $26

Adult Sports/Leisure $6,110 $9 $3,829 $6 $2,281 $3

Art $3,677 $75 $2,837 $58 $840 $17

Special Events $1,684 $7 $459 $2 $1,225 $5

Total $481,637 $263,694 $217,943

Business Plan

•Organization chart

•Pricing structure

•Operations Pro Forma

•Risk management plan

•Marketing plan •Capital cash

flow demand

model

• Implementation

schedule

•Core value session

•Demographic analysis

•Operating paradigm

analysis

•Mission/

Visioning

session

In othe r words

Jeff Hunt Director of Campus Recreation University of Maine

In othe r words

Dave Edwards, ASI Associate Executive Director/Director USU and SRWC CSU Long Beach

Evaluat ion Quest ions

Learning Object ives

Quest ion 1

Quest ion 2

Quest ion 3

Quest ions

• Organization chart

• Pricing structure

• Operations Pro Forma

• Risk management plan

• Marketing plan

• Maps

• Existing conditions assessment

• Utilization analysis

• Capacity analysis

• Gap analysis

• Recommended program of spaces

• Site criteria chart

• Stakeholder interviews

• Capital cash flow

demand model

• Implementation

schedule

• SWOT analysis

• Compliance review

• Action plans

• Benchmarking

• Core value session

• Demographic

analysis

• Operating paradigm

analysis

• Mission/Visioning

session

Business Plan

StrategicPlan

Master Plan

Conclusion

Yogi Berra

Thank You!

M a s t e r P l a n v s . S t r a t e g i c P l a n v s .

B u s i n e s s P l a n

This seminar was created for the live learning environment of the Athletic Business Conference & Expo. Brailsford & Dunlavey has no financial interest/arrangement that would be considered a conflict of interest.

top related