mani team strategy_final
Post on 07-May-2015
513 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Strategy? Uh oh!
Strategy? Uh oh!
• Considered reflection on and baselining of what we've achieved• Forge a common understanding of our future goals• Operationalize our goals and define how we will achieve them• Reach an agreement on immediate next steps
Enjoy some face time and one on one interaction
So, why are we gathered here?
DAPA
Giang Tuan Linh (VN)
Regional Management
Communications
Georgina Smith (VN)
Program Coordinator
Aparna Mani (VN)
Research and Liaison
Cu Thi Le Thuy3 (VN)
Administration and HR
Vingkhong Syvankham3
(LPDR)
Hoang Thu Thao3 (VN)
Finance
Chantana Douangsavanh3
(LPDR)
Chintana Chanhdeng3
(LPDR)
Doan Thi Minh Hanh3 (VN)
Regional DirectorRod Lefroy (VN)
Who is CIAT Asia*?
HQMicheal Peters
HQ Clair
Hershey
Agrobiodiversity
Tropical Forages
Adrian Bolliger (LPDR)
Tassilo Tiemann (LPDR)
Cassava
Tin Maung Aye (VN)
Kris Wyckhuys
(VN)
Jonathan Newby1
(VN)
Ou Wenjun2
(CN)
Keith Fahrney (VN)
Sok Sophearith3
(CDA)
Lao Thao3 (LPDR)
*Draft. Not for circulation
• Set the Context: Overview of agricultural and rural development trends, challenges and perceived needs of the region
• Understand the Baseline: Examining CIAT Asia's achievements so far • The Thought Process:
– Establish goals and targets for research impact and resource mobilization (quantitative and qualitative) – Map needs of the region to CIAT's research for development expertise– Prioritize countries and research areas– Discuss current concept notes and proposals and generate ideas for new concept notes– Match concept note ideas to calls, donors and partners – Identify resource requirements (funding, partnerships, skills development, personnel, monitoring
mechanisms)– Define metrics and processes for monitoring and evaluation– Establish timelines
• Solicit Feedback: Discuss with key donors/partners• The Next Steps:
– Develop an overall execution and management plan– Develop a strategy document for communications (?)
What is our approach?
How do we establish goals and targets?
“Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?""That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.”― Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
• Metrics based on socio-economic indicators (AND/OR)– Poverty Index– Hunger Index
• Metrics based on agro-development indicators (AND/OR)– Improvement in yield – Improvement in livelihood of small holder farmers
• Share of – Donors’ fund portfolio - $126B?– CG’s fund portfolio - $1B?– CIAT’s fund portfolio - $120M?
Projects in Asia December 2013
• Total CIAT budget (across 2009-2015): $6.3M• What is our goal for the next 6 years?
CGIAR Fund Status as of September 30, 2013US$ million Window 1 Window 2 Window 3 Provisional Total
Carryover balance 67.8 35.8 51.5 25.5 180.6
2013 Receipts1 138.8 73.2 113.1 3.9 329.0
Transfers from PA / Collection of CSP 6.3 9.4 5.0 (18.5) 2.2
Total Inflows 212.9 118.4 169.6 10.9 511.8
2013 Disbursements2 (110.7) (114.1) (157.3) (382.1)
Fund Balance 102.2 4.3 12.3 10.9 129.7
2013 Contributions in process 56 .8 66 .0 188 .6 311.4
1 Includes $8.5 million of 2012 contributions received in 2013 2 Includes commitments for system costs of $0.32 million
Contributions to the CGIAR Fund in 2013Received and confirmed, as of September 30 (in US$ million)
United Kingdom 81.2 Denmark* 6.2 Luxembourg* 0.7 USA 52.1 Ireland 5.6 South Africa 0.5 World Bank 50.0 India 5.3 Turkey 0.5 Netherlands* 47.9 Finland 3.9 IFAD 0.5 Canada 34.2 European Commission 3.6 IDRC* 0.5 BMGF 31.7 China 3.0 Korea 0.3 Australia 24.0 Russia* 2.2 Nigeria 0.2 Norway 21.2 New Zealand 1.9 Spain 0.2 Japan 20.2 France 1.5 Bangladesh 0.1 Switzerland** 15.5 Italy 1.0 Thailand 0.1 Belgium* 9.6 Mexico 1.0 Portugal 0.05
* Multi-year agreements for window 1 & 2 in place (signed) ** Multi-year agreements for window 1 & 2 are in process
Icel
and
Slov
ak R
epub
lic
Czec
h Re
publ
ic
Gre
ece
Luxe
mbo
urg
Pola
nd
New
Zea
land
Port
ugal
Irel
and
Aust
ria
Finl
and
Kore
a
Spai
n
Belg
ium
Den
mar
k
Italy
Switz
erla
nd
Nor
way
Swed
en
Aust
ralia
Net
herl
ands
Cana
da
Japa
n
Fran
ce
Ger
man
y
Uni
ted
King
dom
Uni
ted
Stat
es
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
26 80 220 327 399 421 449 581 808 1106 1320 1597 2037 2315 2693 2737 3045
4753 5240 5403 5523 5650
1060512028
1293913892
30687
Distribution of ODA by DAC Countries in 2012USD million
2011 2012 YTY ChangeOfficial Development Assistance (ODA) (A + B) 134,607 126,881 -6%
A. Bilateral Official Development Assistance 94,433 88,550 -6%
B. Contributions to Multilateral Institutions 40,174 38,331 -5%
Source: Data as of 23 December 2013 on http://www.oecd.org/development/stats/statisticsonresourceflowstodevelopingcountries.htm
ODA from DAC Countries to Multilateral Organizations in 2012
22.79%
10.24%
17.31%31.13%
18.54%
World Bank Group includes IDA
Regional Development Banks include African Dev. Bank and Asian Dev. Bank
United Nations Agencies include IFAD, UNDP, WFP, UNICEF, UNHCR
EU include EDF
Other Multilateral include IMFb, GAVI and Global Fund
Source: Data as of 23 December 2013 on http://www.oecd.org/development/stats/statisticsonresourceflowstodevelopingcountries.htm
Sector Distribution of Bilateral Funds in 2012
40.4 %
16.0 %
5.2 %
2.3%3.2%
8.3%
24.6%
Social and administrative in-frastructure
Economic infrastructure
Agriculture
Industry and other production
Commodity aid and programme assistance
Humanitarian aid
Other
Source: Data as of 23 December 2013 on http://www.oecd.org/development/stats/statisticsonresourceflowstodevelopingcountries.htm
$4B towards Agriculture
Regional Distribution of total ODA by DAC Donors in 2012
Regional Distribution of ODA by UN Agencies in 2012
45.3%
15.5%
8.9%
22.9%
3.0% 4.5%
Middle East and North AfricaEuropeLatin America and Caribbean
39.2%
20.4%
15.8%
11.0%
3.7%9.9%
Sub-Saharan AfricaSouth and Central AsiaOther Asia and Oceania
Source: Data as of 23 December 2013 on http://www.oecd.org/development/stats/statisticsonresourceflowstodevelopingcountries.htm
$6B towards South and Central Asia
Regional Distribution of ODA by Individual DAC Donors 2012
Source: Data as of 23 December 2013 on
Major Recipients of DAC Members' Aid 2012
What do we focus on?
Research Priorities• Globalization• Big Science
• Balancing porduct delivery with future
needs• Donor needs: metrics and urgency
Macro and Micro Context
• High birth rates• Under nourishment• Aging population
and mechanization• Rising energy prices
3 Development Issues • Livelihood
improvement• Land degradation• Climate Change
And a fund goal of $12M (???)
top related