l.p. csernai 1 laszlo p. csernai, university of bergen, norway differential hbt method to detect...
Post on 03-Jan-2016
219 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
L.P. Csernai 1
Laszlo P. Csernai, Laszlo P. Csernai, University of Bergen, Norway
Differential HBT method Differential HBT method to detect rotationto detect rotation
Wigner - CCNU mini Workshop,Wigner - CCNU mini Workshop,Budapest, Apr. 7-8, 2014Budapest, Apr. 7-8, 2014
L.P. Csernai 3
Global Symmetries Symmetry axes in the global CM-frame:
( y -y) ( x,z -x,-z) Azimuthal symmetry: φ-even (cos nφ) Longitudinal z-odd, (rap.-odd) for v_odd
Spherical or ellipsoidal flow, expansion
Fluctuations Global flow and Fluctuations are simultaneously present Ǝ interference
Azimuth - Global: even harmonics - Fluctuations : odd & even harmonics Longitudinal – Global: v1, v3 y-odd - Fluctuations : odd & even harmonics The separation of Global & Fluctuating flow is a must !! (not done yet)
Peripheral Collisions (A+A)Peripheral Collisions (A+A)
String rope --- Flux tube --- Coherent String rope --- Flux tube --- Coherent YM fieldYM field
3rd flow component
This shape is confirmed by M.Lisa &al. HBT: PLB496 (2000) 1; & PLB 489 (2000) 287.
InitialInitialStateState
L.P. Csernai5
Initial stateInitial state – – reaching equilibriumreaching equilibrium
Initial state by V. Magas, L.P. Csernai and D. Strottman Phys. Rev. C 64 (2001) 014901 & Nucl. Phys. A 712 (2002) 167.
Relativistic, 1D Riemann expansion is added to each stopped streak
L.P. Csernai 7
Pb+Pb 1.38+1.38 A TeV, b= 70 % of b_max
Lagrangian fluid cells, moving, ~ 5 mill.
MIT Bag m. EoS
FO at T ~ 200 MeV, but calculated much longer, until pressure is zero for 90% of the cells.
Structure and asymmetries of init. state are maintained in nearly perfect expansion.
PIC-PIC-hydrohydro
..\zz-Movies\LHC-Ec-1h-b7-A.mov
ATeV A TeV
[ Csernai L P, Magas V K, Stoecker H, Strottman D D, Phys. Rev. C 84 (2011) 024914 ]
L.P. Csernai 8
Detecting initial rotation Detecting initial rotation
L.P. Csernai 9
KHI
ROTATION
KHI2.4 fm
PIC method !!!
L.P. Csernai 10
2.1 fm
The Kelvin – Helmholtz instability (KHI)The Kelvin – Helmholtz instability (KHI)
• Shear Flow:• L=(2R-b) ~ 4 – 7 fm, init. profile height• lz =10–13 fm, init. length (b=.5-.7bmax)
• V ~ ±0.4 c upper/lower speed • Minimal wave number is
k = .6 - .48 fm-1
• KHI grows as where
• Largest k or shortest wave-length will grow the fastest.
• The amplitude will double in 2.9 or 3.6 fm/c for (b=.5-.7bmax) without expansion, and with favorable viscosity/Reynolds no. Re=LV/ν .
• this favors large L and large VL.P. Csernai 11
L
V
V
Our resolution is (0.35fm)3 and83 markers/fluid-cell ~ 10k cells & 10Mill m.p.-s
lz
The Kelvin – Helmholtz instability (KHI)The Kelvin – Helmholtz instability (KHI)
• Formation of critical length KHI (Kolmogorov length scale)• Ǝ critical minimal wavelength beyond which the KHI is able to
grow. Smaller wavelength perturbations tend to decay. (similar to critical bubble size in homogeneous nucleation).
• Kolmogorov: • Here is the specific dissipated
flow energy.• We estimated:
• It is required that we need b > 0.5 bmax
• Furthermore Re = 0.3 – 1 for andRe = 3 – 10 for
L.P. Csernai 12
Onset of turbulence around the Bjorken flowOnset of turbulence around the Bjorken flow
• Transverse plane [x,y] of a Pb+Pb HI collision at √sNN=2.76TeV at b=6fm impact parameter
• Longitudinally [z]: uniform Bjorken flow, (expansion to infinity), depending on τ only.
L.P. Csernai 13
S. Floerchinger & U. A. Wiedemann, JHEP 1111:100, 2011; arXiv: 1108.5535v1
nucleons energy density [fm] [fm]
x
y
P T
Green and blue have the same longitudinal speed (!) in this model.Longitudinal shear flow is omitted.
y
x x
Onset of turbulence around the Bjorken flowOnset of turbulence around the Bjorken flow
• Initial state Event by Event vorticity and divergence fluctuations.• Amplitude of random vorticity and divergence fluctuations are the same• In dynamical development viscous corrections are negligible ( no damping)• Initial transverse expansion in the middle (±3fm) is neglected ( no damping)• High frequency, high wave number fluctuations may feed lower wave numbers
L.P. Csernai 14
S. Floerchinger & U. A. Wiedemann, JHEP 1111:100, 2011; arXiv: 1108.5535v1
y
Max Max = 0.2 = 0.2 c/fmc/fm
L.P. Csernai 15
Typical I.S. model – scaling flowTypical I.S. model – scaling flow
X
t
The same longitudinal expansion velocity profile in the whole [x,y]-plane !No shear flow. No string tension! Usually angular momentum is vanishing!
Such a re-arrangement of the matter density is dynamicallynot possible in a short time!
Zero vorticity&Zero shear!
PZ
T
L.P. Csernai 16
The momentum distribution, in arbitrary units normalized to the total c.m. energy and momentum. The momentum is zero. Rapidity constraints at projectile and target rapidities are not taken into account! [Philipe Mota, priv. comm.]
PT
c.m.
Δy = 2.5
Bjorken scaling flow assumption:
Also [Gyulassy & Csernai NPA (1986)]
also [Adil & Gyulassy (2005)]
L.P. Csernai 17
Adil & Gyulassy (2005) initial stateAdil & Gyulassy (2005) initial state
Considering a longitudinal “local relative rapidity slope”, based on observations in D+Au collisions:
x, y, η, τ coordinates Bjorken scaling flow
L.P. Csernai 18
Detecting rotation: Detecting rotation: Lambda polarizationLambda polarization
From hydro
[ F. Becattini, L.P. Csernai, D.J. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 88, 034905 (2013)]
RHICLHC
4.75fm/c3.56fm/c
L.P. Csernai 19
LHC RHIC
Global Collective Flow vs. Fluctuations
L.P. Csernai 20
L.P. Csernai 21
Global Collective Flow vs. Fluctuations
[Csernai L P, Eyyubova G and Magas V K, Phys. Rev. C 86 (2012) 024912.][Csernai L P and Stoecker H, (2014) in preparation.]
L.P. Csernai 22
Detection of Global Collective FlowWe are will now discuss rotation (eventually enhanced by KHI). For these, the separation of Global flow and Fluctuating flow is important. (See ALICE v1 PRL (2013) Dec.)
•One method is polarization of emitted particles • This is based equilibrium between local thermal vorticity (orbital motion) and
particle polarization (spin).• Turned out to be more sensitive at RHIC than at LHC (although L is larger at LHC)
[Becattini F, Csernai L P and Wang D J, Phys. Rev. C 88 (2013) 034905.] • At FAIR and NICA the thermal vorticity is still significant (!)
so it might be measurable.
•The other method is the Differential HBT method to analyze rotation:• [LP. Csernai, S. Velle, DJ. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014) 034916]
• We are going to present this method now
The Differential HBT method
L.P. Csernai 23
The method uses two particle correlations:
with k= (p1+p2)/2 and q=p1-p2 :
where
and S(k,q) is the space-time source or emission function, while R(k,q) can be calculatedwith, &the help of a function J(k,q):
which leads to:
This is one of the standard method used for many years. The crucial is the function S(k,q).
The space-time source function, S(k,q)
L.P. Csernai 24
• Let us start from the pion phase space distribution function in the Jüttnerapproximation,with
• Then
• and
L.P. Csernai 25
The space-time source function, S(k,q)• Let us now consider the emission probability in the direction of k, for sources s :
• In this case the J-function becomes:
• We perform summations through pairs reflected across the c.m.: -
where
L.P. Csernai 26
The space-time source function, S(k,q)• The weight factors depend on the Freeze out layer (or surface) orientation:
Thus the weight factor is:
and for the mirror image source:
• Then let us calculate the standard correlation function, and construct a new method
L.P. Csernai 27
Results
The correlation function depends on the direction and size of k , and on rotation. we introduce two vectors k+ , k- symmetrically and define the Differential c.f. (DCF):
The DCF would vanish for symmetric sources (e.g. spherical and non-rotation sources)
L.P. Csernai 28
Results
We can rotate the frame of reference:
L.P. Csernai 29
Results
For lower, RHIC energy:
One can evaluate the DCF in these tilted reference frames where (without rotation) theDCF is minimal.
L.P. Csernai 30
Results
L.P. Csernai31
SummarySummary
• FD model: Initial State + EoS + Freeze out & Hadronization
• In p+p I.S. is problematic, but Ǝ collective flow• In A+A the I.S. is causing global collective flow• Consistent I.S. is needed based on a dynamical
picture, satisfying causality, etc.• Several I.S. models exist, some of these are
oversimplified beyond physical principles.• Experimental outcome strongly depends on the I.S.
Thank you
L.P. Csernai 32
L.P. Csernai 33
top related